The invention relates to a method for operating an actuating element and to an actuating drive for carrying out the method in accordance with the preambles of claims 1 and 8.
The method according to the invention is low in noise and energy efficient and is used advantageously in valve drives for determining the closing point of a valve. However, such methods can generally be used in actuating drives in order to determine a mechanical stop of an actuating element, or to detect actuator blockades. A method according to the invention can be used, in particular, in an actuating drive whenever an actuator is to be operated under the control of force, with low noise and in an energy efficient fashion; the invention can thus be used advantageously in heating, ventilation, refrigeration and air conditioning, for example in a radiator valve that is remotely controlled in a wireless fashion.
DE 41 07 860 A1 discloses a method for detecting the closing position of a valve in which a current rise in an electric drive motor is detected. Furthermore, it is known from EP 0 050 960 A or from EP 1 015 800 A, for example, to evaluate a drop in the speed of an electric drive motor in order to detect the closing position of a valve.
It is proposed in EP 1 015 800 A to move a valve in the closing direction in conjunction with a constant motor voltage, and to stop the motor given a certain speed drop and to calculate the closing point. In the event of a battery feed, the regulation thereby required for the feed voltage of the motor can lead to a substantial shortening of the battery service life.
It is the object of the invention to specify an alternative method for operating an actuating element with the aid of which a final position of the actuating element, or a blocking of the actuating drive can be detected, and to carry out which little energy is required, and which can therefore be used effectively, in particular, even in battery-operated actuating drives. Furthermore, the aim is to provide an actuating drive for operating an actuator with the aid of which the method can be carried out.
The said object is achieved according to the invention by the features of claims 1 and 8.
Advantageous refinements follow from the dependent claims.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in more detail below with the aid of the drawing, in which:
Denoted by numeral 1 in
The electric motor 1 is fed via a motor driver module 7 connected to a voltage source 6.
A sensor device 8 for detecting a rotary movement is arranged at the gear unit 2. A signal s generated by the sensor device 8 is fed to a calculation module 9, for example. A speed signal ω and a position signal p are advantageously generated in the calculation module 9 with the aid of the signal s.
A control device of an actuating drive for the actuator 5 has an inner closed loop and, advantageously, also an outer closed loop. The inner closed loop leads from the sensor device 8 via the speed signal ω, converted by the calculation module 9, and a first comparing device 10 via a first control module 11 to the motor driver module 7. The outer control loop leads from the sensor device 8 via the position signal p, converted by the calculation module 9, and a second comparing device 12 via a second control module 13 to the first comparing device 10, and from there via the first control module 11 to the motor driver module 7. At the second comparing device 12, a desired position signal pS of the actuating element is advantageously fed in as command variable.
In an advantageous exemplary embodiment of the actuating drive, the electric motor 1 is a DC motor, and the motor driver module 7 has a driver unit 20 (
The control signal m is, for example, a signal whose pulse width can be modulated by the first control module 11.
The driver unit 20 is, for example, an integrated module, while the electronic switches 22, 23, 24 and 25 are implemented, for example, by MOS field effect transistors.
The motor driver module 7 is fundamentally to be adapted in design to a selected motor type, a suitable motor type being selected depending on what is required of the actuating drive, and an electronic commutating circuit adapted to the motor type being used instead of the bridge circuit 21, for example.
The actuator 5 illustrated in simplified form in
The valve is illustrated in
In
In the state of the valve illustrated in
A travel model of a valve is illustrated in
In an advantageous control method, in which the flow rate q is to be controlled with the aid of the actuator 5, the reference value H0 is as far as possible not exceeded if the aim is a minimum energy consumption of the actuating drive, which is advantageously to be the aim in the case of an energy supply by means of a battery.
In an advantageous calibration method for an actuator that has an actuating element with at least one mechanically blocked final position, a force provided by the actuating drive, or a turning moment provided by the actuating drive is advantageously detected and, once a predetermined value of the force or of the turning moment has been reached, the current position of the actuating element is detected and stored as mechanical final position of the actuator or of the actuating element, and taken into account in a control method.
The calibration method is initiated, for example, via a start signal k fed to the second control module 13 (
If, for example, the actuator is a thermostat valve that is open in the idle state and whose travel H behaves in principle as illustrated in
A control range R (
The information of the signals supplied by the sensor device 8 (
The sensor device 8 preferably comprises a light source and a detector unit tuned to the spectrum of the light source, the light source being directed onto an optical pattern moved by the electric motor 1 such that with the electric motor 1 running light pulses reach the detector unit. The optical pattern is, for example, a disk arranged at the gear unit 2 and having optically reflecting zones, or having holes or teeth which are designed in such a way that a signal from the light source is modulated by the moving optical pattern.
However, it is also possible in principle for the sensor device 8 to be implemented differently, by means of an inductively operating device, for example.
In the second comparing device 12, an error signal (ps−p) is formed from the desired position signal ps and the position signal p determined by the calculation module 9, and led to the second control module 13. A command variable for the first comparing device 10 is generated in the second control module 13. The command variable is advantageously a speed setpoint ωs. In the first comparing device 10, an error signal (ωs−ω) is formed from the speed setpoint ωs and the speed signal ω determined by the calculation module 9, and led to the first control module 11. The control signal m for the motor driver module 7 is generated in the first control module 11 with the aid of the error signal (ωs−ω).
The inner control loop having the first control module 11 keeps the speed of the electric motor 1 constant. Consequently, rotating elements of the gear unit 2 mechanically coupled to the electric motor 1 and of the transformation element 3 are also controlled to constant rotational frequencies in each case in order to neutralize their moments of inertia. Controlling the electric motor 1 to a constant rotational frequency is attended by the advantages that a speed-dependent noise level of the actuating drive is also constant, and can be optimized by suitable selection of the speed setpoint ωs. Furthermore, the said speed control is associated with the advantage that self induction of electric motor 1 and moments of inertia of rotating elements of the actuating drive need not be taken into account in the calculation of a current estimate FE for the actuating force F.
One final position of an actuating element can be reliably determined when the actuating element is moved toward the final position, and in the process the current estimate FE for the actuating force F is calculated repeatedly by a computing module 40 (
In a first variant, the estimate FE can be calculated only approximately using a linear formula A with the aid of the control signal m applied to the motor driver module 7 and of the battery voltage UB. The product formed from the control signal m, the current value of the battery voltage UB and a first constant kU is reduced by a second constant kF:
FE=UB×kU×m−kF {Formula A}
Owing to the fact that when calculating the estimate FE the speed signal ω attributed to the first comparing device 10 is also used in addition to the control signal m, a formula B yields an improved variant in which the estimate FE can be more accurately calculated. The speed signal ω is multiplied by a third constant kω and the resulting product is subtracted from the estimate FE. The mathematical description of the drive model, and thus the formula B for the improved calculation of the estimate FE therefore runs:
FE=UB×kU×m−kω×ω−kF {Formula B}
The formula B for calculating this estimate FE is built up in an optimized fashion with the three constants for an implementation suitable for microprocessors. It goes without saying that a suitable estimate of the actuating force can be calculated with the aid of formula B by mathematical conversion, for example associated with an increase in the number of constants used.
The three constants kU, kω and kF can be determined with little outlay such that the estimate FE can be calculated with sufficient accuracy for determining the final position of the actuating element.
The three constants kU, kω and kF take account of characteristic values or properties of the electric motor 1, the motor driver module 7, the gear unit 8 and the transformation element 3.
The computing module 40 comprises a data structure advantageously stored in a microcomputer of the actuating drive, and at least one program routine, which can be executed by the microcomputer, for calculating the estimate FE. In order to calculate the estimate FE, the current battery voltage UB is input, for example via an analog input of the microcomputer, in each case.
In an exemplary implementation of the computing module 40, the properties of the motor driver module 7 are taken into account by the first constant kU, in particular, while it is chiefly characteristic values of electric motor 1 such as, for example, motor constant and DC resistance that are taken into account by the second constant kω. The gear unit 8 is taken into account by the third constant kF. Furthermore, the efficiency of the actuating drive is taken into account when calculating the estimate FE by having it flow into each of the three constants kU, kω and kF.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
05011437 | May 2005 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4831509 | Jones et al. | May 1989 | A |
5250765 | Mizuno et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5433512 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5594175 | Lyon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5621304 | Kiuchi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5734245 | Terashima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5828193 | Furuta | Oct 1998 | A |
5829335 | Ewald et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5886416 | Arai | Mar 1999 | A |
6084370 | Moller | Jul 2000 | A |
6167873 | Kataoka | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6278249 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6326751 | Mullet et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6744231 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6897630 | Murray et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7000392 | Greentree | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7107126 | Maistre et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7426829 | Greentree | Sep 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 07 860 | Sep 1992 | DE |
0 050 960 | May 1982 | EP |
0 851 163 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1 015 800 | Jul 2000 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060267534 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |