The invention relates to a method and a device for orienting flat items of mail towards a narrow edge.
Stacks of items of mail are automatically separated at the input end of the sorting machine for items of mail, with the respective frontmost item of mail being removed in each instance. The individual items of mail are then conveyed one after the other in an upright position to processing devices such as address readers and printers. This prevents the items of mail at the processing devices from being rotated or elevated. Since this is frequently the case after separation, the items of mail pass through an orientation path after separation. (cf. DE 1 116 602 A, DE 37 09 659 C2, DE 195 28 829 C2, FR 2 692 565 A1). In DE 1 116 602 A, DE 37 09 659 C2, DE 195 28 829 C2 and FR 2 692 565 A1, these consist of an open U-shaped conveying channel, in which the items of mail are conveyed in an upright position without any lateral pressure. In this case, the items of mail are oriented towards the lower narrow edge (lower edge) whilst passing through the orientation path by virtue of their own gravity. The orientation path is thereby designed for ‘acceptable’ ranges in relation to thicknesses, i.e. either for letters and cards or large letters, magazines etc. If, however, a broad thickness range is to be processed, i.e. both thin letters and magazines, the distance of the lateral limit stops of the transport channel must be designed for the maximum thickness of an item of mail.
Thin items of mail with poor intrinsic stiffness however can collapse at least partially whilst passing through the essentially wider conveying channel. They are not then correctly oriented when transferred on the subsequent transport path to the processing devices, this possibly resulting in transport faults, damage to items of mail and reading errors.
The object underlying the invention is thus to create a method and a device for orienting flat items of mail towards a narrow edge with a U-shaped conveying channel, in which the items of mail are conveyed standing on a narrow edge in an upright position without being jammed, both thick and thin items of mail with poor intrinsic stiffness being able to be oriented without the thin soft items of mail collapsing.
According to one aspect, the thickness of the items of mail is measured before they pass through the conveying channel for orientation purposes. The distances of the lateral limit stops or limiting sections are changed by means of adjusting mechanisms for every mail item in such a manner that the item of mail at the end of the conveying channel is oriented towards its lower narrow edge by virtue of its own gravity and the distance of the lateral limit stops of the conveying channel from every item of mail during transport through the conveying channel is just wide enough for the item not to collapse at all nor to collapse partially even if its intrinsic stiffness is poor.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the subclaims.
If a number of items of mail pass through the conveying channel at the same time, it is advantageous to design the lateral limit stops to be flexible. From the known transport speed and a detected front and/or back edge, the length and position of each item of mail during its transport through the conveying channel is determined as a function of the time, and with this data, the flexible lateral limit stops across the length of the conveying channel are changed in terms of their distance to each other for each item of mail, such that the lateral limiting sections adjusted to the respective thicknesses and lengths of the items of mail, move like standing waves in conjunction with the items of mail.
It is also advantageous to provide lateral transport belts which circulate at the same speed as the underframe belt, and are guided via rollers as flexible and gentle lateral limit stops of the conveying channel.
In a further advantageous variant of the embodiment, driven rollers are provided as lateral limit stops of the conveying channel, between which are attached guide plates fixed to the roller supports, the peripheral speed of these rollers corresponding to the transport speed of the underframe belt.
If the distances between the items of mail are so large that there is only ever one item of mail in the conveying channel, it is sufficient for the adjusting mechanism to adjust all rollers collectively by the same amount respectively, the adjusting mechanism being able to be realized in a very cost-effective manner.
The invention is described in more detail below in an exemplary embodiment with reference to the drawing, in which;
As illustrated in
The lateral limit stops of the conveying channel consist of lateral transport belts 4 fed via rollers 5, 6, circulating at the same speed as the underframe belt, with one of the rollers 5, 6, being driven in each instance. The rollers 5 of the lateral transport belt 4 on the side of the locally fixed transfer roller 11 are similarly arranged in a locally fixed manner. The corresponding rollers 6 of the lateral transport belt 4 on the other side of the conveying channel 3 after the locally moveable transfer roller 12 are supported on roller levers 7 in a moveable and rotatable manner. The roller levers 7 can be rotated about a levering fulcrum 8 and are held in idle position with the narrowest channel width provided by means of pressure springs. The swivel motions are each achieved by an actuator with an eccentric tappet 9 engaging on the roller lever 7. A photo sensor 14 is also located before the conveying channel 3, said photo sensor being connected in a similar manner to the control unit 15. The photo sensor 14 detecting the front and back edges of the items of mail 1, 2 and the known transport speed allow the position and length of each item of mail 1, 2 to be determined at any time in the control unit and their thickness to be determined in the thickness sensor 13.
Correspondingly, input signals are transmitted to the connected actuator with the eccentric tappets 9. In this way, the eccentric tappets are adjusted and the roller levers 7 swiveled such that the rollers 6 move outwards with the transport belt 4 and each item of mail 1, 2 encounters a channel width during its transport through the conveying channel 3, which is somewhat wider than its widest thickness. This allows the items of mail 1, 2 to pass through the conveying channel 3 without jamming, and to orient themselves towards their lower narrow edge, but not to collapse. If the item of mail 2 following the leaving item of mail 1 at a relatively short distance has a different thickness, the roller 6 is correspondingly moved outwards at the conveying channel input, shortly before the leading edge of the item of mail has reached the conveying channel input. This can thus only occur once the trailing edge of the previously leaving item of mail 1 has left the input area. In this way, each locally moveable roller 6 is moved according to the thickness of the item of mail 1, 2, located in its area. This brings about a type of standing wave movement at this lateral limit stop which moves in conjunction with the items of mail 1, 2.
If the distances between the items of mail 1, 2 are so large, that only one item of mail 1, or 2 is ever conveyed or oriented in the conveying channel 3, it is not necessary to monitor the items of mail 1, 2, in the conveying channel 3. It is also enough then to adjust the rollers 6 in a collective and uniform manner. As shown in
The lateral transport belt 4 can naturally also be adjusted by using other drives known to the person skilled in the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 19 723 | May 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/003147 | 3/25/2004 | WO | 00 | 10/24/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/096454 | 11/11/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3203534 | Burkhardt et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
4973039 | Jeske et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4995504 | Kuehn | Feb 1991 | A |
5331151 | Cochran et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5465825 | Levaro et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5507479 | Martin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5560598 | Goldkuhle | Oct 1996 | A |
6196537 | Conner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6328300 | Stefan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6435498 | Stefan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6536756 | Stefan et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6746009 | Engarto et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6877739 | Leitz et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7052008 | Mitsuya et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7096743 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
12 17 878 | May 1966 | DE |
195 28 829 | Feb 1997 | DE |
2 692 565 | Dec 1993 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060249438 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |