1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to stabilizing the threshold voltage active elements in active matrix Field Emission Displays (FEDs).
2. State of the Art
A cold cathode FED uses electron emissions to illuminate a cathodoluminescent screen and generate a visual image. An individual field emission cell typically includes one or more emitter sites formed on a baseplate. The baseplate in active matrix FEDs typically contains the active semiconductor devices (e.g., field effect transistors) that control electron emissions from the emitter sites. The emitter sites may be formed directly on a baseplate formed of a material such as silicon or on an interlevel conductive layer (e.g., polysilicon) or interlevel insulating layer (e.g., silicon dioxide, silicon nitride) formed on the baseplate. A gate electrode structure, or grid, is typically associated with the emitter sites. The emitter sites and grids are connected to an electrical source for establishing a voltage differential to cause a Fowler-Nordheim electron emission from the emitter sites. These electrons strike a display screen having a phosphor coating, releasing the photons that illuminate the screen. A single pixel of the display screen is typically illuminated by one or more emitter sites.
In a gated FED, the grid is separated from the base by an insulating layer. This insulating layer provides support for the grid and prevents the breakdown of the voltage differential between the grid and the baseplate. Individual field emission cells are sometimes referred to as vacuum microelectronic triodes. The triode elements include the cathode (field emitter site), the anode (cathodoluminescent element) and the gate (grid). U.S. Pat. No. 5,210,472, granted to Stephen L. Casper and Tyler A. Lowrey, entitled “Flat Panel Display In Which Low-Voltage Row and Column Address Signals Control A Much Higher Pixel Activation Voltage,” and incorporated herein by reference, describes a flat panel display that utilizes FEDs.
The quality and sharpness of an illuminated pixel site of the display screen is dependent upon the precise control of the electron emission from the emitter sites that illuminate a particular pixel site. In forming a visual image, such as a number or letter, different groups of emitter sites must be cycled on or off to illuminate the appropriate pixel sites on the display screen. To form a desired image, electron emissions may be initiated in the emitter sites for certain pixel sites while the adjacent pixel sites are held in an off condition. For a sharp image, it is important that those pixel sites required to be isolated remain in an off condition. Thus, shifts in the threshold voltage (VT) (the voltage necessary to turn on the transistor for the pixel) are undesirable, and there is difficulty in maintaining the VT at a level such that unwanted activation will not occur.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method of constructing an FED with a light-blocking element that prevents photons generated in the environment and by a display screen of the FED from affecting semiconductor junctions on a baseplate of the FED. It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an improved method of constructing FEDs using an opaque layer that protects semiconductor junctions on a baseplate from light and which may also perform other circuit functions. It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an FED with improved junction leakage characteristics using techniques that are compatible with large-scale semiconductor manufacture. A further object of this invention is to provide a means for protecting the cathode structure of an FED. A still further object of the present invention is to shield transistors and semiconductor junctions of an FED against X-rays and other electromagnetic radiation. Finally, it is still further an object of the present invention to manufacture a high-quality FED display having a long life.
In accordance with the present invention, an improved method of constructing FEDs for flat panel displays and other electronic equipment is provided. The method, generally stated, comprises the formation of radiation-blocking elements between a cathodoluminescent display screen and baseplate of the FED. A light-blocking element protects semiconductor junctions on a substrate of the FED from photons generated in the environment and by the display screen. An X-ray-blocking element prevents damage to the cathode structures from X-rays generated when electrons bombard the phosphor screen. The light-blocking element may be formed as an opaque layer adapted to absorb or reflect light. In addition to protecting the semiconductor junctions from the effects of photons, the opaque layer may serve other circuit functions. The opaque layer, for example, may be patterned to form interlevel connecting lines for circuit components of the FED.
In an illustrative embodiment, the light-blocking element is formed as an opaque, light-absorbing material deposited on a baseplate for the FED. As an example, a metal such as titanium that tends to absorb light can be deposited on the baseplate of an FED. Other suitable opaque materials include insulative light-absorbing materials such as carbon black, impregnated polyamide, manganese oxide and manganese dioxide. Moreover, such a light-absorbing layer may be patterned to cover only the areas of the baseplate that contain semiconductor junctions. The light-blocking element may also be formed of a layer of a material, such as aluminum, adapted to reflect rather than absorb light.
In another embodiment, an X-ray-blocking layer is formed, the layer comprising an X-ray-blocking material disposed between the picture elements and the cathodes. As an example, a metal such as tungsten that has a high atomic number Z and tends to block X-rays, may be used in order to prevent, at least partially, X-ray radiation from damaging the cathode structures. Lead, titanium, and other metals, ceramics and compounds that have a high atomic number Z and tend to block X-rays may serve as suitable alternative materials. The X-ray-blocking layer can also be patterned to cover only particular areas that house sensitive cathode structures and semiconductor junctions, and may be formed of layers of more than one type of X-ray-blocking material.
Other objects, advantages and capabilities of the present invention will become more apparent as the description proceeds.
It has been found that photons generated by the luminescent display screen, as well as photons present in the environment (e.g., sunshine), cause an emitter site to emit electrons unexpectedly. In some FEDs, P/N junctions can be used to electrically isolate each pixel site and to construct row-column drive circuitry and current regulation circuitry for the pixel operation. During operation of the FED, some of the photons generated at a display screen, as well as photons from the environment, may strike the semiconductor junctions on the substrate. This may affect the junctions by changing their electrical characteristics. In some cases, this may cause an unwanted current to pass across the junction. This is one type of junction leakage in an FED that may adversely affect the address or activation of pixel sites and cause stray emissions and consequently a degraded image quality.
In experiments conducted by the inventors, junction leakage currents have been measured in the laboratory as a function of different lighting conditions at the junction. At a voltage of about 50 volts, and depending on the intensity of light directed at a junction, junction leakage may range from picoamps (i.e., 10−12 amps) for dark conditions, to microamps (i.e., 10−6 amps) for well-lit conditions. In FEDs, even relatively small leakage currents (i.e., picoamps) will adversely affect the image quality. The treatise entitled “Physics of Semiconducting Devices” by S. M. Sze, copyright 1981 by John Wiley and Sons, Inc., at paragraphs 1.6.1 to 1.6.3, briefly describes the effect of photon energy on semiconductor junctions.
Moreover, it has been found by the inventors that unblocked electromagnetic radiation may damage the semiconductor junctions or the cathode structure. Exposure to photons from the display screen and external environment may change the properties of some junctions on the substrate associated with the emitter sites, causing current flow and the initiation of electron emissions from the emitter sites on the adjacent pixel sites. The electron emissions may cause the adjacent pixel sites to illuminate when a dark background is desired, again causing a degraded or blurry image. In addition to isolation and activation problems, light from the environment and display screen striking junctions on the substrate may cause other problems in addressing and regulating current flow to the emitter sites of the FED cell.
For example, a problem may occur when photons (i.e., light) generated by a light source strike the semiconductor junctions formed in the substrate. Further, photons from an illuminated pixel site may strike the junctions formed at the N-type conductivity regions on the adjacent pixel sites. The photons are capable of passing through the spacers, grid and insulating layer of the FED, because these layers are often formed of materials that are translucent to most wavelengths of light, such as spacers formed of a translucent polyamide (e.g., kapton or silicon nitride), or an insulative layer may be formed of translucent silicon dioxide, silicon nitride or silicon oxynitride. The grid may also be formed of translucent polysilicon.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,814,968, granted to Nathanson et al., addresses the problem with aluminization deposited on the screen member. However, such an approach does not work for high resolution active matrix FEDs, because cathode voltages are relatively low (e.g., 200 volts), and an aluminum layer formed on the inside surface of the display screen cannot be penetrated by enough electrons emitted at these low voltages. Therefore, this approach is not suitable in an active matrix FED.
It is also known in the art to construct FEDs with circuit traces formed of an opaque material, such as chromium, that overlie the semiconductor junctions contained in the FED baseplate. As an example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,970,887, granted to Smith et al., describes such a structure (see
Another problem which may arise is caused by the presence of X-rays or radiation, often generated when electrons impinge upon the phosphor screen. The term “X-ray” means an electromagnetic radiation which has wavelengths in the range of 0.06 nm to 12.5 nm; visible light has wavelengths in the range of 400 nm to 800 nm. In FEDs, generated X-rays are emitted in virtually all directions. Because of the close proximity of the cathode to the X-ray emitting anode in an FED, it has been found that the cathode structure may be damaged by such exposure. In particular, if a silicon chip is used as a substrate on which the cathode structure is built up, the transistors or semiconductor junctions on the baseplate are susceptible to damage from these X-rays.
Referring now to drawing
The plurality of emitter sites 14 is adapted to emit electrons 28 that are directed at a cathodoluminescent display screen 18 coated with a phosphor material 19. A gate electrode or grid 20, separated from the substrate 12 by an insulating layer 23, surrounds each emitter site 14 of the plurality. Support structures 24, also referred to as spacers, are located between the baseplate 11 and the display screen 18.
An electrical source 26 establishes a voltage differential between the plurality of emitter sites 14 and the grid 20 and display screen 18. The electrons 28 from activated emitter sites 14 of the plurality generate the emission of photons from the phosphor material contained in the corresponding pixel site 10 of the display screen 18. To form a particular image, it may be necessary to illuminate pixel site 10 while adjacent pixel sites 10′ on either side remain dark.
Referring now to drawing
Surrounding the emitter site 40 is a gate structure or grid 42. The grid 42 is separated from the P-type substrate 36 by an insulating layer 44. The insulating layer 44 includes an etched opening 52 for the emitter site 40. The grid 42 is connected to metal conductive lines 60 formed on an interlevel insulating layer 62. The metal conductive lines 60 are embedded in an insulating layer and/or passivation layer 66 and are used to control operation of the grid 42 or other circuit components.
A display screen 48 is aligned with the emitter site 40 and includes a phosphor coating 50 in the path of electrons 54 emitted by the emitter site 40. An electrical source 46 is connected directly or indirectly to the emitter site 40 which functions as a cathode. The electrical source 46 is also connected to the grid 42 and to the display screen 48 which function as an anode.
When a voltage differential is generated by the electrical source 46 between the emitter site 40, the grid 42 and the display screen 48, electrons 54 are emitted at the emitter site 40. These electrons 54 strike the phosphor coating 50 on the display screen 48. This produces the photons 56 that illuminate the display screen 48.
For all of the circuit elements described thus far, fabrication processes that are known in the art can be utilized. As an example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,186,670, granted to Doan et al. and incorporated herein by reference, describes suitable processes for forming the P-type substrate 36, emitter site 40 and grid 42.
The P-type substrate 36 and grid 42 and their associated circuitry form the baseplate 70 of the FED. The single crystal P-type silicon substrate contains semiconductor devices that control the operation of the emitter site 40. These devices are combined to form row-column drive circuitry, current regulation circuitry, and circuitry for electrically activating or isolating the emitter site 40. As an example, the previously cited U.S. Pat. No. 5,210,472, granted to Casper et al. and incorporated herein by reference, describes pairs of MOSFETs formed on a silicon substrate and connected in series to emitter sites. One of the series connected MOSFETs is gated by a signal on the row line. The other MOSFET is gated by a signal on the column line.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a light-blocking layer 64 is formed on the baseplate 70. The light-blocking layer 64 prevents light from the environment and light generated at the display screen 48 from striking semiconductor junctions, such as the junction formed by the N-type conductivity region 58, on the P-type substrate 36. A passivation layer 72 is formed over the light-blocking layer 64.
The light-blocking layer 64 is formed of a material that is opaque to light. Further, light-blocking layer 64 is, in the alternative, a conductive or an insulative material. In addition, the light-blocking layer 64 is, also in the alternative, either light absorptive or light reflective. Suitable materials include both absorptive materials and reflective materials (for example, titanium or aluminum). Other suitable conductive materials include: aluminum-copper alloys, refractory metals, and refractory metal silicides. In addition, suitable insulative materials include manganese oxide, manganese dioxide or a chemical polymer (for example, carbon black impregnated polyamide). These insulative materials tend to absorb light and can be deposited in a relatively thick layer.
For a light-blocking layer 64 formed of metal, acceptable deposition techniques include: CVD, sputtering, or electron beam deposition (EBD). For a light-blocking layer 64 formed of an insulative material or chemical polymer, acceptable techniques include liquid deposition, and cure processes are used according to some embodiments to form a layer having a desired thickness.
The light-blocking layer 64 is blanket deposited in some embodiments to cover substantially all of the baseplate 70. Alternatively, light-blocking layer 64 is patterned using a photolithography process, thus protecting predetermined areas on the P-type substrate 36 (i.e., areas occupied by junctions). Furthermore, according to still further embodiments, light-blocking layer 64 is constructed to serve other circuit functions. As an example, in one embodiment, light-blocking layer 64 is patterned to function as an interlevel connector.
An acceptable process sequence for forming an emitter site 40 with the light-blocking layer 64 is as follows:
1. Form electron emitter sites 40 as protuberances, tips, wedges, cones or knife edges by masking and etching a single crystal silicon substrate 36.
2. Form N-type conductivity regions 58 for the emitter sites 40 by patterning and doping the single crystal silicon substrate 36.
3. Oxidation sharpen the emitter sites 40 using a suitable oxidation process.
4. Form the insulating layer 44 by the conformal deposition of a layer of silicon dioxide. Other insulating materials such as silicon nitride and silicon oxynitride may also be used.
5. Form the grid 42 by deposition of doped polysilicon followed by chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) for self aligning the grid 42 and emitter site 40. Such a process is detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,331 to Doan et al., incorporated herein by reference. In place of polysilicon, other conductive materials such as chromium, molybdenum and other metals may also be used.
6. Photopattern and dry etch the grid 42.
7. Form interlevel insulating layer 62 on grid 42. Form contacts through the interlevel insulating layer 62 by photopatterning and etching.
8. Form metal conductive lines 60 for grid connections and other circuitry. Form passivation layer 66.
9. Form the light-blocking layer 64. According to some embodiments, for example, for a light-blocking layer formed of titanium or other metal, the light-blocking layer is deposited to a thickness of between about 2000 Å and about 4000 Å. Other materials are deposited to a thickness suitable for that particular material.
10. Photopattern and dry etch the light-blocking layer 64, passivation layer 66 and interlevel insulating layer 62 to open emitter site 40 and bond pad connection areas.
11. Form passivation layer 72 on light-blocking layer 64.
12. Form openings through the passivation layer 72 for the emitter sites 40.
13. Etch the insulating layer 44 to open the etched opening 52 for the emitter sites 40. This is accomplished according to one embodiment using photopatterning and wet etching. For silicon emitter sites 40 oxidation sharpened with a layer of silicon dioxide, one suitable wet etchant is diluted HF acid.
14. Continue processing to form spacers or support structures and display screen 48.
Thus, the invention provides a method for preventing junction leakage in an FED utilizing a light-blocking element formed on a baseplate of the FED. It is understood that the above process sequence is merely exemplary and may be varied, depending upon differences in the baseplate, emitter site and grid materials and their associated formation technology.
It has also been found that, in addition to visible light, X-rays are emitted by the phosphor, which also contribute to an unstable threshold voltage VT. Therefore, referring now to drawing
Referring still to
Most materials useful for blocking X-rays have a mass attenuation coefficient which varies as a function of X-ray energy. Also, while two materials may be useful for blocking X-rays, one may absorb more X-rays of lower energy (higher wavelength) while the other material may absorb more for higher energy (lower wavelength) X-rays. Therefore, in some embodiments, multiple X-ray-blocking materials are used to facilitate absorption of X-rays over a broader range of energy levels than could be accomplished with each material individually.
Acceptable X-ray-blocking materials for the present invention extend to any chemical elements or compounds having a high atomic number Z. Tungsten and lead are examples of such materials. Titanium is also a good material for blocking X-rays. Blocking materials, in particular, materials having high atomic numbers Z, are provided according to various embodiments of the invention in the form of metals, oxides, ceramics, etc.
Materials employed for light-blocking are not necessarily good for X-ray blocking. Such limitations in selecting protective materials are overcome, according to the invention, in stacking more than one layer of protective materials, one on top of the other. A further approach contemplated by the present invention is to apply several blocking materials simultaneously, each blocking different wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum (although some overlap is permissible).
As discussed above, in some embodiments, two X-ray-blocking layers are employed. In one such embodiment, the bottom layer blocks the main portion of X-rays produced by the anodes, whereas the top layer of the stack is selected to aid in light blocking, as well as filling the X-ray band gaps in the material of the bottom layer. Tungsten as a bottom layer with aluminum as the top layer is one example. However, any other combination or coordination of the location and the blocking ability of a layer is also contemplated by the present invention.
Referring again to the drawing
Drawing
Referring now to drawing
Examples of blocking material for X-ray blocker 110 of drawing
The layers 101, 102 are also selected according to other requirements necessary for the functioning of the vacuum device according to drawing
The thickness of the X-ray blocker 110 or layers 101, 102 may be determined using the following equation:
I(X)/I0=e−μρx
Restated, radiation traversing a layer of substance is reduced in intensity by a constant fraction μ per centimeter. After penetrating to a depth x, the intensity is:
I(X)=I0e−μρx
In the above equations, IO is the initial intensity, I(x) is the intensity after path length x, ρ is the mass density of the element in question, and μ is the mass attenuation coefficient describing the attenuation of radiation as it passes through matter by the above equation. The term μ/ρ is the mass absorption coefficient where ρ is the density of the material. The mass attenuation coefficients to be used are for photons for elements at energies corresponding to the wavelengths of the X-rays (radiation) to be blocked by the X-ray blocker 110 or layers 101, 102 should be used. Since X-rays of differing wavelengths are to be blocked, the calculation is required for the desired energy levels of X-rays to be blocked by the desired material to be used. Further, since thin films of blocking materials are used, mass attenuation coefficients for materials applied in thin films should be used.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a process for making a field emission device is also provided, comprising: forming an emitter on a substrate; forming a dielectric layer over the emitter; forming an X-ray- (radiation-) blocking layer over the dielectric layer; and positioning, in a vacuum, the emitter in opposed relation to a phosphor screen. Examples of acceptable methods for forming the emitter on the substrate are seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,391,259; 5,374,868; 5,358,908; 5,358,601; 5,358,599; 5,329,207; 5,372,973; 4,859,304; and 4,992,137; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
According to a further embodiment, the forming of an X-ray-blocking layer comprises forming a conductive layer of X-ray material as a grid over the emitter. According to an alternative embodiment, the process further includes the steps of: forming a grid over the dielectric layer and forming an insulator over the grid, wherein forming an X-ray-blocking layer comprises forming an X-ray-blocking layer over the insulator. According to a still further embodiment, forming an X-ray-blocking layer further comprises forming a conductive X-ray-blocking layer over the insulator.
According to a still further embodiment, a focus ring is formed over the emitter and forming an X-ray-blocking layer comprises forming an X-ray-blocking layer on a surface of the focus ring between the focus ring and the emitter. According to an alternative embodiment, forming an X-ray-blocking layer comprises forming an X-ray-blocking layer on a surface of the focus ring between the focus ring and the phosphor screen.
According to a still further embodiment of the invention, the light-blocking layer is tied to a fixed potential in relation to the anode or cathode. This fixing of the potential avoids charge build-up on the blocking layer, which would degrade performance of the device.
All of the United States patents cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety.
While the particular process as herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of obtaining the object and advantages hereinbefore stated, it is to be understood that it is merely illustrative of the exemplary embodiments of the invention and that no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown other than as mentioned in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/400,732, filed Mar. 27, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,098,587, issued Aug. 29, 2006, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/191,677, filed Jul. 8, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,712,664, issued Mar. 30, 2004, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/159,245, filed Sep. 23, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,605, issued Jul. 9, 2002, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/907,256, filed Aug. 6, 1997, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/542,718, filed Oct. 13, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 08/307,365, filed Sep. 16, 1994, now abandoned.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. DABT63-93-C-0025 awarded to Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3500102 | Crost et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3671795 | Jeffries | Jun 1972 | A |
3814968 | Nathanson et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3883760 | Cunningham | May 1975 | A |
3970887 | Smith et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4104532 | Weiss | Aug 1978 | A |
4575765 | Hirt | Mar 1986 | A |
4859304 | Cathey et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4874981 | Spindt | Oct 1989 | A |
4940916 | Borel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4992137 | Cathey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5000208 | Ludwig et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5012153 | Atkinson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015912 | Spindt et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024722 | Cathey | Jun 1991 | A |
5049520 | Cathey | Sep 1991 | A |
5090932 | Dieumegard et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5100355 | Marcus et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5115460 | De Lange | May 1992 | A |
5141461 | Nishimura et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142184 | Kane | Aug 1992 | A |
5151061 | Sandhu | Sep 1992 | A |
5162704 | Kobori et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5186670 | Doan et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191217 | Kane et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199917 | MacDonald et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204581 | Andreadakis et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205770 | Lowrey et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210472 | Casper et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212426 | Kane | May 1993 | A |
5219310 | Tomo et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5229331 | Doan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5229682 | Komatsu | Jul 1993 | A |
5232549 | Cathey et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5259799 | Doan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5283500 | Kochanski | Feb 1994 | A |
5329207 | Cathey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342477 | Cathey | Aug 1994 | A |
5358599 | Cathey et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358601 | Cathey | Oct 1994 | A |
5358908 | Reinberg et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372973 | Doan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374868 | Tjaden et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391259 | Cathey et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394006 | Liu | Feb 1995 | A |
5448133 | Ise | Sep 1995 | A |
5451830 | Huang | Sep 1995 | A |
5483118 | Nakamoto et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5500750 | Kanbe et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5600698 | Terashima et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620832 | Sung et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621272 | Levine et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632664 | Scoggan et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633560 | Huang | May 1997 | A |
5637023 | Itoh et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643033 | Gnade et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5643817 | Kim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648698 | Makishima et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648699 | Jin et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5865657 | Haven et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5866281 | Guckel et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5866979 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889758 | Maehara et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5970114 | Lee et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975975 | Hofmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6020683 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040613 | McTeer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6186850 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6398608 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417605 | Hofmann et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436788 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6712664 | Hofmann et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6987352 | Hofmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7098587 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 139 868 | Mar 1972 | DE |
0 503 638 | Sep 1992 | EP |
549 133 | Jun 1993 | EP |
1 311 406 | Mar 1973 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060226761 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10191677 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10400732 | US | |
Parent | 09159245 | Sep 1998 | US |
Child | 10191677 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10400732 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 11301206 | US | |
Parent | 08542718 | Oct 1995 | US |
Child | 08907256 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08907256 | Aug 1997 | US |
Child | 09159245 | US | |
Parent | 08307365 | Sep 1994 | US |
Child | 08542718 | US |