Method and device for producing three-dimensional components with the aid of an overfeed sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11235518
  • Patent Number
    11,235,518
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 30, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 1, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a 3D printing method and, in particular, a device and a method for setting an overfeed.
Description
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

The present application claims priority to German Patent Application DE 10 2015 015 353.6 filed on Dec. 1, 2015, by Ederer et al., the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


FIELD

The present invention relates to a method for producing three-dimensional components, amorphous particulate material being applied in layers to a build space, particulate material being placed on a build space in front of a scraper apparatus and then spread out, and the particulate material being subsequently solidified.


The invention furthermore relates to a device for producing three-dimensional components, comprising a coating device which includes a scraper apparatus and comprising a selective solidification apparatus.


BACKGROUND

A method for producing three-dimensional objects from computer data is described in the European patent specification EP 0 431 924 B1. In this method, a particulate material is applied in a thin layer to a platform with the aid of a coater, and a binder material is selectively printed onto this particulate material, using a print head. The particle area onto which the binder is printed is bound and solidifies under the influence of the binder and possible an additional hardener. The building platform is then lowered by the thickness of one layer, or the coater/print head unit is raised, and a new layer of particulate material is applied, which is also selectively printed upon as described above. These steps are repeated until the desired height of the object is reached. A three-dimensional object (molded part) is thus produced from the printed and solidified areas.


After it is completed, this object produced from solidified particulate material is embedded in loose particulate material and is subsequently removed therefrom. This is done, for example, using an extractor. This leaves the desired objects, from which powder deposits are removed, for example by manual brushing.


Of the layering techniques, 3D printing based on powdered materials and the supply of liquids with the aid of a print head is the fastest method.


This method may be used to process different fluids, such as particulate materials, including natural biological raw materials, polymers, metals, ceramics and sands (not an exhaustive list).


In addition, other methods exist, such as the fused deposition modeling (FDM) layering method, in which the cross sections of the component are built up by a liquid medium which solidifies outside a nozzle, the position of the building platform is changed from the last position by one layer thickness, and these steps are be repeated until the component is finished.


All these methods are referred to collectively below as “layering methods,” “three-dimensional printing methods” or 3D printing methods.


Other powder-supported rapid prototyping processes work in a similar manner, for example selective laser sintering or electron beam sintering, in which a loose particulate material is also deposited in layers and selectively solidified with the aid of a controlled physical radiation source. The material is thus solidified by high-energy radiation. In conventional production systems, the components are frequently produced in layers vertically from top to bottom.


In 3D printing using the binder jetting technique, powders are the basis for the process. They are repeatedly applied in thin layers onto a building platform and printed with binder. The building platform is lowered for each new layer. Similarly, the coater plane may be raised, or the building platform may be designed as a conveyor belt.


The material may be provided, for example, in a silo and transferred to the production machine with the aid of screw conveyors. The binder is introduced by manually inserting binder-filled canisters, and the build container may be set up by means of rails or simply using a transport frame. In doing so, the spatial directions of all movements cross each other. In many cases, movements in individual operations are possible in multiple or all spatial directions.


In the layering process of the aforementioned methods, powder is placed, for example, in front of a scraper apparatus, spread out over the build space and smoothed. Various devices are used for this purpose. On the one hand, the powder may be provided upstream from the beginning of the build space. Slides that place a quantity of powder in the active area of the scraper apparatus are suitable for this purpose. On the other hand, powder may be continuously delivered in front of the scraper apparatus during the coating process.


All methods generate an overfeed, which accumulates up to the end of the coating path and/or is depleted from the original volume, depending on the method and setting. In this specification, this quantity is referred to as overfeed (overflow quantity). The overfeed is the quantity of powder that is pushed in front of the coater at the end of the build space during the coating pass.


If no overfeed occurs at the end of the coating path, the layer has not been completely filled to a relatively great degree of certainty. The presence of the overfeed at the end of the coating path is an indication that too much powder is being processed but the layer has been completely filled.


SUMMARY

The object of this invention, therefore, is to provide a method and a device which use this knowledge to document a reliable process flow and also to regulate it according to one preferred specific embodiment.


This object is achieved by a method and a device according to the teachings herein.


In one aspect, disclosed is a method for producing three-dimensional components, amorphous particulate material being applied in layers to a build space in a receiving plane, particulate material being placed on a build space in front of a scraper apparatus and then spread out, and the particulate material subsequently being selectively solidified. A measurement of an overfeed of particulate material is carried out.


In another aspect, the disclosure relates to a device for producing three-dimensional components, comprising a coating device which includes a scraper apparatus and comprising a selective solidification apparatus, at least one sensor for measuring an overfeed of particulate material being provided downstream from the coating device in the coating direction.


These aspects of the disclosure may be further characterized by one or any combination of the features disclosed herein. For example, these aspects of the disclosure may be further characterized by one or any combination of the following features: the measurement takes place during a coating pass; the measurement takes place at the end of a coating pass; the measurement takes place locally resolved; the measurement takes place over an entire coater width; a supply of particulate material is controlled directly by the measurement; the sensor is provided at the end of a coating path; one or more sensors are binary; one or more sensors are digital; one or more sensors are analog; one or more sensors are/or chromatographic sensors; a particulate material supply means is provided for supplying particulate material to a build space (preferably during a coating pass); or the particulate material supply means is controllable by the one or more sensors.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1: shows a sectional view of a device for producing three-dimensional components by means of the binder jetting technique.



FIG. 2: shows an illustration of the overfeed during the coating operation, different positions of the coater being shown in FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, and FIG. 2C.



FIG. 3: shows an illustration of a propagation of coating defects during the coating operation.



FIG. 4: shows a resulting overfeed over the length of the coater during the coating operation from FIG. 3.



FIG. 5: shows a representation of a device for determining the overfeed quantity with the aid of a weighing device.



FIG. 6: shows a representation of a binary method for determining the presence of overfeed with the aid of a sensor.



FIG. 7: shows a representation of an expanded, locally resolved determination of the overfeed.



FIG. 8: shows a representation of an implementation of the spatial overfeed distribution in a time signal with the aid of a light barrier.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A number of terms are defined in greater detail below. Otherwise, the meanings known to those skilled in the art are to be understood for the terms used.


Within the meaning of the invention, “layering method” and “3D printing method” are all methods known from the prior art which facilitate the construction of components in three-dimensional molds and are compatible with the described process components and devices.


“Molded body” or “component” within the meaning of the invention are all three-dimensional objects that are produced with the aid of the method according to the invention and/or the device according to the invention and which have a nondeformability.


“Build space” is the plane or, in the broader sense, the geometric place on or in which the particulate material feedstock grows during the build process, due to repeated coating with particulate material. The build space is frequently delimited by a base, the “building platform,” by walls and an open cover surface, the build plane.


According to the present description, a “reception plane” is understood to be the plane to which the build material is applied. It does not necessarily have to be a straight surface but may also have a curvature. This plane also does not absolutely have to correspond to a platform or conveyor belt plane. Instead, the reception plane may also be, for example, a material cone side of the build material.


According to the present invention, “spread out” means any way in which the particulate material is distributed. For example, a large amount of powder may be provided at the start position of a coating pass and be distributed into the layer volume or spread out by a blade or a rotating roller.


All free-flowing materials known for 3D printing may be used as “particulate material,” in particular in powdered form, as slag or as a liquid. This may be, for example, sands, ceramic powders, glass powders and other powders made of inorganic materials, metal powders, plastics, wood particles, fibrous materials, celluloses and/or lactose powders as well as other types of organic, powdered materials. The particulate material is preferably a dry, free-flowing powder, although a cohesive, firm powder may also be used. This cohesiveness may also result from the admixture of a binder material or an auxiliary material.


The “overflow quantity” or “overfeed” is the quantity of particulate material that is pushed in front of the coater at the end of the build space during the coating pass.


Any known 3D printing device for layering that contains the necessary components may be used as the “device” for carrying out the method according to the invention. Common components include a coater, a build space, a means for moving the build space or other components, a dosing device and a heating means and other components which are known to those skilled in the art and therefore do not need to be listed in greater detail here.


A “coater” or “recoater” is the unit by means of which the particulate material is applied to or onto the build space. It may comprise a fluid storage container and a fluid application unit, the fluid application unit, according to the present invention, including a fluid outlet and a “scraper apparatus.” This scraper apparatus could be a coater blade. However, any other conceivable, suitable scraper apparatus could also be used. For example, rotating rollers are conceivable.


A “selective solidification apparatus” may be, for example, a radiation source which solidifies the particulate material by supplying radiation. However, it may also be a print head which selectively applies the binder material and/or activator material or the like to the particulate material.


The “print head” is usually assembled from different components. These are the print modules, among other things. They are oriented relative to the print head. The print head is oriented relative to the machine. As a result, the location of a nozzle may be assigned to the machine coordinate system.


“Binder jetting layering” is understood to mean that powder is applied in layers onto a building platform, a liquid binder is printed onto the cross sections of the component on this powder layer, the position of the building platform is changed from the last position by one layer thickness, and these steps are repeated until the component is finished.


“Laser sintering layering” is understood to mean that powder is applied in layers onto a building platform, the cross sections of the component on this powder layer are melted with the aid of a laser beam and solidified by cooling, the position of the building platform is changed from the last position by one layer thickness, and these steps are repeated until the component is finished.


In “stereo lithography layering,” the cross sections of the component are solidified by a laser beam in a container having a liquid, by means of a chemical reaction. The position of the building platform is changed from the last position by one layer thickness, and these steps are repeated until the component is finished.


Different aspects of the invention are described below.


In one aspect, the invention relates to a method for producing three-dimensional components, amorphous particulate material being applied in layers to a build space in a receiving plane, particulate material being placed on a build space in front of a scraper apparatus and then spread out, and the particulate material subsequently being selectively solidified. A measurement of an overfeed of particulate material is then carried out.


Common to all layering methods is that they have an overflow quantity of particulate material, which collects up to the end of the coating path and/or is depleted from the original volume, depending on the method and setting. This quantity is also referred to as overfeed. The overfeed is the quantity of powder that is pushed in front of the coater at the end of the build field during the coating pass.


If no overfeed occurs at the end of the coating path, it can usually be assumed that the layer has not been completely filled. The presence of the overfeed at the end of the coating path is an indication that too much powder is being processed, but the layer has been completely filled.


The present invention uses this property to document a secure process flow with regard to the particulate material coating.


According to one preferred specific embodiment of the invention, the method is carried out in such a way that the measurement of the overfeed takes place at the end of and/or during a coating pass.


According to one particularly preferred specific embodiment of the present invention, in the method, the measurement of the overfeed is locally resolved and is preferably carried out over an entire coater width.


This may take place using different methods. For example, multiple sensors may be disposed a short distance downstream from the build space in the width of the coater, and its signals may be distinctively evaluated. It is also conceivable to use a quasi-analog, locally resolved sensor. This analog signal must then be analyzed in terms of time. The overfeed, as described in this specification, may also be time-resolved by a special design of the device.


In a method of this type, it is now possible to obtain information, locally resolved, transversely to the coating direction. However, it should be noted here that this resolution is limited by the running together of the powder, due to the method.


Process defects, as used in the present case, are sites which are not filled with particulate material after the passage of the coater. Tests have shown that serious process defects begin on the build space and usually spread in the direction of the end of the coating path. A resolution which is relevant to the particular system may thus be determined. The density of the sensing elements may be determined or the evaluation method assessed with the aid of this resolution.


In a method according to the invention, the measurement of the particulate material distribution may also preferably take place during the coating pass, and a particulate material supply means may be controlled directly by the measurement.


If a regulation is to take place in addition to the measurement, a type of actuator should also be provided, which acts upon the powder quantity.


According to another aspect, the invention also relates to a device for producing three-dimensional components, comprising a coating device which includes a scraper apparatus and comprising a selective solidification apparatus. At least one sensor for measuring an overfeed of particulate material is provided downstream from the coating device in the coating direction.


If the sensor is provided at the end of a coating path, according to one preferred specific embodiment, whether an overfeed is or is not present may be measured at the end. As was already described above, coating defects spread over the application path and are thus also detectable at the end of the coating pass.


The sensors for measuring the overfeed may be binary, digital, analog and/or chromatographic sensors.


In principle, all sensors suitable for detecting the presence of powder may be used. Optical sensors, capacitive sensors as well as load cells are examples thereof.


All sensors should be disposed in such a way that they reliable detect the overfeed powder, and the same conditions again prevail layer by layer. To achieve the second effect, passive or active designs may be used. A passive design could be, for example, a powder waste shaft, into which the overfeed powder falls and is detected while falling.


The powder may likewise be first pushed to a measuring point and then into a waste shaft by the coater. This movement may also run in an integrated, continuous manner. In an active device, within the meaning of this invention, the status is forcibly reestablished by an add-on element. One example thereof could be a flap, on which the overfeed powder is sensed and subsequently flipped into a waste container.


A binary sensor within the meaning of the invention only determines whether overfeed powder is or is not present after the coating process. An arrangement of this type may be achieved, for example, with the aid of an initiator which is disposed downstream from the build space, beneath the coater plane. Its sensitive surface must be disposed in the direction of the overfeed powder. Optical and capacitive sensors, for example, are suitable.


An arrangement of this type is suitable only for detecting very serious faults in the coating operation. A defect location may not be made out.


A similar effect may be achieved by arranging multiple sensors downstream from the build space, transversely to the coating direction. Due to the increased resolution, this “digital sensor” is much more suitable for monitoring the coating operation. Much smaller defects may be detected with the aid of this arrangement, and the quantity of sensors may be adapted to the process conditions. The signal is locally resolved in this method.


If the overfeed powder is detected by an analog measuring apparatus, this may further improve the monitoring of the coating operation. A sensor of this type may be a weighing apparatus. The signal may quantitatively reflect the seriousness of the fault. A local resolution is not possible.


If the waste shaft is disposed at an angle to the coater and combines the powder in the waste shaft with the aid of an adjuster, conclusions may be drawn about the location of the fault by measuring the powder throughput over time. A large number of methods are suitable for this measurement. For example, light barriers as well as load cells may be used.


According to one preferred specific embodiment, in a device according to the invention, a particulate material supply means is provided for supplying particulate material to a build space during a coating pass.


If a regulation is to additionally take place, a type of actuator should also be provided, which acts upon the powder quantity.


Such a control of the particulate material supply means is controllable, for example, with the aid of sensors.


The present invention is explained in greater detail below on the basis of examples which illustrate the preferred specific embodiments.


The basic device for applying the invention is a device used in production in the sense of additive manufacturing. Powder-based methods are essential in this case.


In powder-based methods, a thin layer of powder must be generated as the basis for the process. Examples thereof are illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2. A particle layer is applied to a building platform (102), which is provided in a build container (104). In the method according to the prior art, this building platform (102) and its movement define the shape and geometry of the layer. Layers having exactly parallel bases and cover surfaces (204) are usually desirable. Building platform (102) is therefore precisely guided, and its movement defines the layer thickness.


This volume (206) is filled with powder by the so-called coater (202). A large amount of powder is usually provided at the start position of the coating pass and spread out into layer volume (206) by blade (205) or a rotating roller. However, the powder may also be delivered during the coating operation.


The quantity of powder may also be stored (201), for example, in the coater itself. The coater begins to dispense powder in the direction of travel at the beginning of the build space. Powder is continuously dispensed during the coating pass to compensate for the loss due to the filling of the layer or at least to ensure that sufficient material remains for filling at the end of the coating pass. Overfeed powder present at the end of the coating pass may be pushed past the edge of the build space and allowed to fall there (209).


The quantity of powder in front of the coater should not be unnecessarily large. Too large a quantity of powder is harmful to the layering process in two respects. On the one hand, a large quantity in front of the coater results in comparatively high forces on the emerging components in the powder. This may cause deformations. On the other hand, a large overfeed at the end of the coating pass is undesirable, since the material actually unused may be fed back to the process only after complex sieving. There is a high probability that this powder contains contaminants such as component fragments or traces of binding agent


The flow of powder of the exemplary coating system with “inner storage” is switched by vibrations with the aid of an eccentric drive (203). The coater itself is designed as an elongated silo, which has a narrow opening on its lower end in the coating direction. The powder is unable to leave the narrow gap without vibrations, since bridges made of the particles form, or the powder flows out in a longitudinal gap (601). Either the bridges are broken or the material angle of repose is changed by the energy of the vibrations. The material flows out.


In this exemplary system, the outflow is limited by the quantity that forms the overfeed of the filling in front of the coater. A self-regulating principle is thus implemented.


Tests have shown that defects in the coating process are usually caused by insufficient reflowing of powder into volume (206) to be filled. Since these defects continue to develop during the coating pass, frequent and less frequent defect patterns occur (see FIG. 3). Defects that close again at the beginning of coating pass (302) are extremely rare. Local faults (301) in build space (300) without spreading to the rear likewise do not occur. The most frequent defects (303) start in the middle of build space (300) and increase in intensity up to the end of the coating path. An absence of the overfeed may therefore characterize faults in the coating operation very well. If a reaction does not occur, furrows (304) form, which become deeper layer by layer and divide the components.


A coater (202), driven via an eccentric (203), as illustrated in the example, is particularly suitable for a regulation. The upper limit of the powder quantity is regulated by the mechanism described. The lower limit may be easily observed by evaluating the overfeed.


In devices according to the prior art, the coater pushes overfeed (200) onward to a waste shaft (208) downstream from the build space, so that the powder does not disturb the rest of the build process. The part of the device downstream from the build space is usually covered by a thin quantity of powder (207), which is built up by the overfeed before the actual build process begins, like on the building platform.



FIG. 4 shows a diagram that represents the mass flow from the coater at a point in time. In the form of a diagram, the figure shows an example of the defect status of the coater which is to be detected by the method. It is apparent how blockages in the powder gap influence the outflow quantity.



FIG. 5 shows a specific embodiment, in which overfeed (200) falls over the edge of build space (209) and then lands in the bowl of a weighing device (500), whereby overfeed (200) may be measured by weighing. After weighing, bowl (500) may be automatically emptied with the aid of a pivot joint (501).


In the example illustrated in FIG. 6, capacitive sensors (600) are disposed upstream from waste shaft (208). One or multiple sensors is/are installed, depending on the desired resolution. They are adjusted in such a way that they do not detect the thin powder layer situated above them, which does not change during the build process. However, if an additional quantity of powder passes over sensors (600), they emit a signal.


The controller must ensure that the signals of the overfeed quantity and the coater body or the blade are differentiated. FIG. 7 shows the arrangement of the sensors relative to the build space. This may take place by precisely determining the position and matching it to the signal over time. The controller may likewise be designed in such a way that the coater with the overfeed stops at the height of the sensors and is moved backward a short distance, so that the sensor signal is not influenced. The measurement is thus no longer time-critical, and the requirements imposed on the evaluation are much less strict.


To achieve a spatial resolution of the information, multiple sensors (600) are installed in the exemplary device in a line in parallel to the coater. In this example, the coater is to be able to cover a build space width of 550 mm, and the sensors are distributed evenly over this length. As a result, defects having a dimension of approximately 50 mm may be reliably detected at the end of the build space.


At least one sensor for directly measuring an overfeed of the particulate material over an edge of the build space may be measured directly using at least one sensor (see for example FIGS. 5 and 7).



FIG. 8 illustrates another option for achieving a spatial resolution. In the top view a), the build space is illustrated from above, including the coater and a rotated powder waste shaft. As is apparent in the side view b), the waste powder flow is collected in a hopper. As a result, the overfeed powder would fall little by little into the hopper when it passes over the waste shaft, and thus results in a way to detect the local powder outflow quantity. FIG. 8C shows an example of a signal. It illustrates an outflow behavior in which less powder exits at the edges of the coater.


In this arrangement, five sensors are evaluated as follows: If one of the sensors does not supply a signal, the vibration is intensified during the generation of the next layer of the build process, in this case via the rotational speed of eccentric excitation means (203). If all sensors supply signals, the rotational speed is reduced for the next layer. This maintains the coating operation for the build process in a nearly optimum corridor.


Coater (202) itself is designed as an elongated silo, which has a narrow opening on its lower end in the coating direction. The powder is unable to leave the narrow gap without vibrations, since bridges made of the particles form, or the powder flows out in a longitudinal gap (601). Either the bridges are broken or the material angle of repose is changed by the energy of the vibrations. The material flows out.


Typical rotational speeds for the vibration excitation in the arrangement described above are around 3,000 rpm. The regulation adjusts the rotational speed of the coating by discrete values for each layer—the rotational speed is discretely reduced or increased, depending on the sensor result. The rotational speed is preferably adjusted in increments of 10 rpm. Increments of 50 rpm are even more preferable. Rapid changes in powder qualities may also be processed at 300 rpm—although the defect susceptibility continues to increase. In principle, there is no limit to the increment sizes in the rotational speed range of 0 to 6,000 rpm.


The regulation may also act upon other parameters, for example if the powder dispensing quantity is not controlled via the rotational speed. For example, the lift of a storage cylinder may be adapted. The lift is increased or reduced, depending on the sensor result.


The device described may also be used only for monitoring the process. The signal of sensors (600) is logged layer by layer for this purpose. This approach may be desirable when the parameters, which may be adjusted, influence, for example, the component properties, and this is unacceptable. The information may be additionally used to display a warning to the machine operator.


In the process flow of the machine, the printing of the build space using a print head (100) follows the coating pass. This may be followed by additional steps, depending on the process. After they are carried out, building platform (102) is moved and brought into a position which makes it possible to generate the next layer with the aid of the coater. The parameters which were changed by the regulation are used for this next coating pass. The coating pass is again evaluated by the regulating mechanism.


Components (103) are completed by continuously repeating this sequence.


LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS


100 Print head



102 Building platform



103 Component



104 Build container



200 Overfeed



201 Powder stock



202 Coater



203 Eccentric vibration drive



204 Cover layer/build space



205 Leveling blade



206 As yet unfilled layer area



207 Leveled powder outside the build space



208 Powder waste shaft



209 Falling overfeed powder



300 Build space



301 Inner coating defect



302 Coating defect at the coating pass starting point



303 Coating defect at the end of the build space



304 Deep coating defect



500 Bowl of a weighing apparatus



501 Pivot joint for automated emptying



600 Sensor for detecting powder



601 Clogged powder outflow



800 Rotated powder waste shaft

Claims
  • 1. A device for producing three-dimensional components, comprising: prior to producing the three-dimensional components, a build container having a build space;a coating unit which includes a scraper apparatus, wherein the coating unit passes over the build container and applies a particulate material in layers;a selective solidification apparatus; andat least one sensor for directly measuring an overfeed of the particulate material over an edge of the build space;wherein the sensor is provided at an end of a coating path of the coating unit; and the overfeed is measured at the end of the coating path after the layer of the particulate material has been deposited onto the build space.
  • 2. A device for producing three-dimensional components, comprising: prior to producing the three-dimensional components, a build container having a build space;a coating unit which includes a scraper apparatus for providing a particulate material in layers;a selective solidification apparatus; andat least one sensor for measuring a weight or load of an overfeed of the particulate material;wherein the overfeed is measured at the end of a coating path of the coating unit after the layer of the particulate material has been deposited onto the build space.
  • 3. The device of claim 2, wherein the at least one sensor is provided at an end of the coating path.
  • 4. The device of claim 2, wherein the at least one sensor includes multiple sensors arranged in a line parallel to the coating unit.
  • 5. The device of claim 2, wherein a particulate material supply means is provided for supplying particulate material to a build space during a pass of the coating unit; optionally, wherein the particulate material supply means is controllable by the one or more sensors.
  • 6. The device of claim 2, wherein the one or more sensors are binary, digital, analog, and/or chromatographic sensors.
  • 7. The device of claim 2, wherein the device includes a controller for regulation of the coating unit based on the measured overfeed.
  • 8. A device for producing three-dimensional components, comprising: a coating unit which includes a scraper apparatus for providing a particulate material in layers;a selective solidification apparatus; andat least one sensor for measuring an overfeed of the particulate material;wherein the at least one sensor is located in a side wall which the coating unit passes over and measures the particulate material above the at least one sensor;wherein the overfeed is measured at the end of a coating path of the coating unit after the layer of the particulate material has been deposited onto the build space.
  • 9. The device of claim 8, wherein each of the at least one sensors is a binary sensor.
  • 10. The device of claim 8, wherein the at least one sensors includes multiple sensors arranged in a line parallel to the coating unit.
  • 11. The device of claim 8, wherein a particulate material supply means is provided for supplying particulate material to a build space during a pass of the coating unit; optionally, wherein the particulate material supply means is controllable by the at least one sensors.
  • 12. The device of claim 9, wherein the at least one sensors includes multiple sensors arranged in a line parallel to the coating unit.
  • 13. The device of claim 2, wherein the device includes a controller for regulation of the coating unit based on the measured overfeed; the at least one sensors includes multiple sensors arranged in a line parallel to the coating unit;optionally wherein the sensors are located in a side wall which the coating unit passes over, and measures the particulate material above the sensors.
  • 14. The device of claim 2, wherein the device includes an angled waste shaft or a rotated powder waste shaft.
  • 15. The device of claim 2, wherein the overfeed is resolved for identifying a location of a defect in the overfeed, transversely to a coating direction.
  • 16. The device of claim 2, wherein the device is an active device which forcibly removes the overfeed of the particulate material.
  • 17. The device of claim 1, wherein the device includes a plurality of the sensors, each of the sensors measure a overfeed at a different location along a length of the coating unit in an x-axis and the coating unit moves in a linear direction in a y-axis.
  • 18. The device of claim 2, wherein the device includes a plurality of the sensors, each of the sensors measure a overfeed at a different location along a length of the coating unit in an x-axis and the coating unit moves in a linear direction in a y-axis.
  • 19. The device of claim 8, wherein the device includes a plurality of the sensors, each of the sensors measure a local overfeed at a different location along a length of the coating unit in an x-axis and the coating unit moves in a linear direction in a y-axis.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2015 015 353.6 Dec 2015 DE national
US Referenced Citations (376)
Number Name Date Kind
3913503 Becker Oct 1975 A
4247508 Housholder Jan 1981 A
4575330 Hull Mar 1986 A
4591402 Evans et al. May 1986 A
4600733 Ohashi et al. Jul 1986 A
4665492 Masters May 1987 A
4669634 Leroux Jun 1987 A
4711669 Paul et al. Dec 1987 A
4752352 Feygin Jun 1988 A
4752498 Fudim Jun 1988 A
4863538 Deckard Sep 1989 A
4938816 Beaman et al. Jul 1990 A
4944817 Bourell et al. Jul 1990 A
5017753 Deckard May 1991 A
5031120 Pomerantz et al. Jul 1991 A
5047182 Sundback et al. Sep 1991 A
5053090 Beaman et al. Oct 1991 A
5059266 Yamane et al. Oct 1991 A
5076869 Bourell et al. Dec 1991 A
5120476 Scholz Jun 1992 A
5126529 Weiss et al. Jun 1992 A
5127037 Bynum Jun 1992 A
5132143 Deckard Jul 1992 A
5134569 Masters Jul 1992 A
5136515 Helinski Aug 1992 A
5140937 Yamane et al. Aug 1992 A
5147587 Marcus et al. Sep 1992 A
5149548 Yamane et al. Sep 1992 A
5155324 Deckard et al. Oct 1992 A
5156697 Bourell et al. Oct 1992 A
5182170 Marcus et al. Jan 1993 A
5204055 Sachs et al. Apr 1993 A
5216616 Masters Jun 1993 A
5229209 Gharapetian et al. Jul 1993 A
5248456 Evans, Jr. et al. Aug 1993 A
5252264 Forderhase et al. Oct 1993 A
5263130 Pomerantz et al. Nov 1993 A
5269982 Brotz Dec 1993 A
5284695 Barlow et al. Feb 1994 A
5296062 Bourell et al. Mar 1994 A
5316580 Deckard May 1994 A
5324617 Majima et al. Jun 1994 A
5340656 Sachs et al. Aug 1994 A
5342919 Dickens, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5352405 Beaman et al. Oct 1994 A
5354414 Feygin Oct 1994 A
5382308 Bourell et al. Jan 1995 A
5387380 Cima et al. Feb 1995 A
5398193 deAngelis Mar 1995 A
5418112 Mirle et al. May 1995 A
5427722 Fouts et al. Jun 1995 A
5431967 Manthiram et al. Jul 1995 A
5433261 Hinton Jul 1995 A
5482659 Sauerhoefer Jan 1996 A
5490962 Cima et al. Feb 1996 A
5503785 Crump et al. Apr 1996 A
5506607 Sanders, Jr. et al. Apr 1996 A
5518060 Cleary et al. May 1996 A
5518680 Cima et al. May 1996 A
5555176 Menhennett et al. Sep 1996 A
5573721 Gillette Nov 1996 A
5589222 Thometzek et al. Dec 1996 A
5597589 Deckard Jan 1997 A
5616294 Deckard Apr 1997 A
5616631 Kiuchi et al. Apr 1997 A
5637175 Feygin et al. Jun 1997 A
5639070 Deckard Jun 1997 A
5639402 Barlow et al. Jun 1997 A
5647931 Retallick et al. Jul 1997 A
5658412 Retallick et al. Aug 1997 A
5665401 Serbin et al. Sep 1997 A
5717599 Menhennett et al. Feb 1998 A
5730925 Mattes et al. Mar 1998 A
5740051 Sanders, Jr. et al. Apr 1998 A
5747105 Haubert May 1998 A
5749041 Lakshminarayan et al. May 1998 A
5753274 Wilkening et al. May 1998 A
5807437 Sachs et al. Sep 1998 A
5837960 Lewis et al. Nov 1998 A
5851465 Bredt Dec 1998 A
5884688 Hinton et al. Mar 1999 A
5902441 Bredt et al. May 1999 A
5902537 Almquist et al. May 1999 A
5904889 Serbin et al. May 1999 A
5906294 Ikeya May 1999 A
5934343 Gaylo et al. Aug 1999 A
5940674 Sachs et al. Aug 1999 A
5943235 Earl et al. Aug 1999 A
5989476 Lockard et al. Nov 1999 A
5997795 Danforth Dec 1999 A
6007318 Russell et al. Dec 1999 A
6036777 Sachs Mar 2000 A
6042774 Wilkening et al. Mar 2000 A
6048188 Hull et al. Apr 2000 A
6048954 Barlow et al. Apr 2000 A
6133353 Bui et al. Oct 2000 A
6146567 Sachs et al. Nov 2000 A
6147138 Hochsmann et al. Nov 2000 A
6155331 Langer et al. Dec 2000 A
6164850 Speakman Dec 2000 A
6165406 Jang et al. Dec 2000 A
6169605 Penn et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175422 Penn et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193922 Ederer Feb 2001 B1
6210625 Matsushita Apr 2001 B1
6216508 Matsubara et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217816 Tang Apr 2001 B1
6259962 Gothait Jul 2001 B1
6270335 Leyden et al. Aug 2001 B2
6305769 Thayer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316060 Elvidge et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318418 Grossmann et al. Nov 2001 B1
6335052 Suzuki et al. Jan 2002 B1
6335097 Otsuka et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350495 Schriener et al. Feb 2002 B1
6355196 Kotnis et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375874 Russell et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395811 Nguyen et al. May 2002 B1
6401001 Jang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6403002 Van Der Geest Jun 2002 B1
6405095 Jang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416850 Bredt et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423255 Hoechsmann et al. Jul 2002 B1
6460979 Heinzl et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476122 Leyden Nov 2002 B1
6485831 Fukushima et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500378 Smith Dec 2002 B1
6554600 Hofmann et al. Apr 2003 B1
6596224 Sachs et al. Jul 2003 B1
6610429 Bredt et al. Aug 2003 B2
6616030 Miller Sep 2003 B2
6658314 Gothait Dec 2003 B1
6672343 Perret et al. Jan 2004 B1
6713125 Sherwood et al. Mar 2004 B1
6722872 Swanson et al. Apr 2004 B1
6733528 Abe et al. May 2004 B2
6742456 Kasperchik et al. Jun 2004 B1
6764636 Allanic et al. Jul 2004 B1
6827988 Krause et al. Dec 2004 B2
6830643 Hayes Dec 2004 B1
6838035 Ederer et al. Jan 2005 B1
6855205 McQuate et al. Feb 2005 B2
6896839 Kubo et al. May 2005 B2
6972115 Ballard Dec 2005 B1
6989115 Russell et al. Jan 2006 B2
7004222 Ederer et al. Feb 2006 B2
7037382 Davidson et al. May 2006 B2
7048530 Gaillard et al. May 2006 B2
7049363 Shen May 2006 B2
7087109 Bredt et al. Aug 2006 B2
7120512 Kramer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7137431 Ederer et al. Nov 2006 B2
7153463 Leuterer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7204684 Ederer et al. Apr 2007 B2
7220380 Farr et al. May 2007 B2
7291002 Russell et al. Nov 2007 B2
7296990 Devos et al. Nov 2007 B2
7332537 Bredt et al. Feb 2008 B2
7348075 Farr et al. Mar 2008 B2
7378052 Harryson May 2008 B2
7381360 Oriakhi et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387359 Hernandez et al. Jun 2008 B2
7402330 Pfeiffer et al. Jul 2008 B2
7431987 Pfeiffer et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435072 Collins et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435368 Davidson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7455804 Patel et al. Nov 2008 B2
7455805 Oriakhi et al. Nov 2008 B2
7497977 Nielsen et al. Mar 2009 B2
7531117 Ederer et al. May 2009 B2
7550518 Bredt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7578958 Patel et al. Aug 2009 B2
7597835 Marsac Oct 2009 B2
7641461 Khoshnevis Jan 2010 B2
7665636 Ederer et al. Feb 2010 B2
7722802 Pfeiffer et al. May 2010 B2
7807077 Ederer et al. May 2010 B2
7736578 Ederer et al. Jun 2010 B2
7748971 Hochsmann et al. Jul 2010 B2
7767130 Elsner et al. Aug 2010 B2
7795349 Bredt et al. Sep 2010 B2
7799253 Höchsmann et al. Sep 2010 B2
7879393 Ederer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7887264 Naunheimer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7927539 Ederer Apr 2011 B2
8020604 Hochsmann et al. Sep 2011 B2
8096262 Ederer et al. Jan 2012 B2
8186415 Marutani et al. May 2012 B2
8349233 Ederer et al. Jan 2013 B2
8506870 Hochsmann et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524142 Unkelmann et al. Sep 2013 B2
8574485 Kramer Nov 2013 B2
8715832 Ederer et al. May 2014 B2
8727672 Ederer et al. May 2014 B2
8741194 Ederer et al. Jun 2014 B1
8911226 Gunther et al. Dec 2014 B2
8951033 Höchsmann et al. Feb 2015 B2
8956140 Hartmann Feb 2015 B2
8956144 Grasegger et al. Feb 2015 B2
8992205 Ederer et al. Mar 2015 B2
9174391 Hartmann et al. Nov 2015 B2
9174392 Hartmann Nov 2015 B2
9242413 Hartmann et al. Jan 2016 B2
9321934 Mögele et al. Apr 2016 B2
9327450 Hein et al. May 2016 B2
9333709 Hartmann May 2016 B2
9358701 Gnuchtel et al. Jun 2016 B2
20010045678 Kubo et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010050031 Bredt et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020015783 Harvey Feb 2002 A1
20020016387 Shen Feb 2002 A1
20020026982 Bredt et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020079601 Russell Jun 2002 A1
20020090410 Tochimoto et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111707 Li et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020155254 McQuate et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020167100 Moszner et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030004599 Herbak Jan 2003 A1
20030065400 Beam et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069638 Barlow et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083771 Schmidt May 2003 A1
20030113729 DaQuino et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114936 Sherwood et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040003738 Imiolek et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012112 Davidson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040025905 Ederer et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040026418 Ederer et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040035542 Ederer et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040036200 Patel et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038009 Leyden et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040045941 Herzog et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040056378 Bredt et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040084814 Boyd et al. May 2004 A1
20040094058 Kasperchik et al. May 2004 A1
20040104515 Swanson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112523 Crom Jun 2004 A1
20040138336 Bredt et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145088 Patel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040170765 Ederer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040173946 Pfeifer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040187714 Napadensky et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040207123 Patel et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040239009 Collins et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040265413 Russell Dec 2004 A1
20050003189 Bredt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050017386 Harrysson Jan 2005 A1
20050017394 Hochsmann et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050074511 Oriakhi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093194 Oriakhi et al. May 2005 A1
20050167872 Tsubaki et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050174407 Johnson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050179167 Hachikian Aug 2005 A1
20050211163 Li Sep 2005 A1
20050212163 Bausinger et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050218549 Farr et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050219942 Wallgren Oct 2005 A1
20050280185 Russell Dec 2005 A1
20050283136 Skarda Dec 2005 A1
20060013659 Pfeiffer et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060105102 Hochsmann et al. May 2006 A1
20060108090 Ederer et al. May 2006 A1
20060159896 Pfeifer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060175346 Ederer et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060208388 Bredet et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060237159 Hochsmann Oct 2006 A1
20060251535 Pfeifer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060254467 Farr et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257579 Farr et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070045891 Martinoni Mar 2007 A1
20070054143 Otoshi Mar 2007 A1
20070057412 Weiskopf et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065397 Ito et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070126157 Bredt Jun 2007 A1
20070215020 Miller Sep 2007 A1
20070238056 Baumann et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080001331 Ederer Jan 2008 A1
20080018018 Nielsen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080047628 Davidson et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080138515 Williams Jun 2008 A1
20080187711 Alam et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080233302 Elsner et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237933 Hoehmann et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080241404 Allaman Oct 2008 A1
20080260945 Ederer et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080299321 Ishihara Dec 2008 A1
20090011066 Davidson et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090068376 Philippi et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090261497 Ederer et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100007062 Larsson et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026743 Van Thillo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100152865 Jonsson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100207288 Enrico Aug 2010 A1
20100212584 Ederer et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100243123 Voxeljet Sep 2010 A1
20100244301 Ederer et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100247742 Shi et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100272519 Ederer et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279007 Briselden et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291314 Kahani-Shirazi Nov 2010 A1
20100323301 Tang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110049739 Uckelmann et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110059247 Kuzusako et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110177188 Bredt et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110223437 Ederer et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110308755 Hochsmann Dec 2011 A1
20120046779 Pax et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120094026 Ederer et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120097258 Harmann et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120113439 Ederer et al. May 2012 A1
20120126457 Abe et al. May 2012 A1
20120189102 Maurer, Jr. et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120291701 Grasegger et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120329943 Hicks et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130000549 Hartmann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130004610 Hartmann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026680 Ederer et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130029001 Gunther et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130052291 Morikawa Feb 2013 A1
20130078325 Sperry Mar 2013 A1
20130092082 Ederer et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130157193 Moritani et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130189434 Randall et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130199444 Hartmann Aug 2013 A1
20130234355 Hartmann et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130302575 Mogele et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130313757 Kashani-Shirazi Nov 2013 A1
20140048980 Crump et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140002023 Ederer et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140202382 Ederer Jul 2014 A1
20140212677 Gnuchtel et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140227123 Gunster Aug 2014 A1
20140236339 Fagan Aug 2014 A1
20140271961 Khoshnevis Sep 2014 A1
20140306379 Hartmann et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140322501 Ederer et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150042018 Gunther et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150069659 Ederer et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150110910 Hartmann et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150165574 Ederer et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150210822 Ederer et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150224718 Ederer et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150251336 Goto Sep 2015 A1
20150266238 Ederer et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150273572 Ederer et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150290881 Ederer et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150375418 Hartmann Dec 2015 A1
20150375419 Gunther et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160001507 Hartmann et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160052165 Hartmann Feb 2016 A1
20160052166 Hartmann Feb 2016 A1
20160318251 Ederer et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160107386 Hartmann et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160114533 Grassegger et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160228987 Baudimont Aug 2016 A1
20160263828 Ederer et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160303762 Gunther Oct 2016 A1
20160311167 Gunther et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160311210 Gunther et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170028630 Ederer et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170050378 Ederer Feb 2017 A1
20170050387 Ederer Feb 2017 A1
20170106595 Gunther et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170136524 Ederer et al. May 2017 A1
20170151727 Ederer et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170157852 Ederer et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170182711 Gunther et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170210037 Ederer et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170297263 Ederer et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170305139 Hartmann Oct 2017 A1
20170355137 Ederer et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180079133 Ederer et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180141271 Gunter et al. May 2018 A1
20180326662 Gunther et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180369910 Gunter et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190047218 Ederer et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190084229 Gunther Mar 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (66)
Number Date Country
720255 May 2000 AU
3221357 Dec 1983 DE
3930750 Mar 1991 DE
4102260 Jul 1992 DE
4305201 Apr 1994 DE
4 325 573 Feb 1995 DE
29506204 Jun 1995 DE
4440397 Sep 1995 DE
19525307 Jan 1997 DE
19530295 Jan 1997 DE
19528215 Feb 1997 DE
29701279 May 1997 DE
19545167 Jun 1997 DE
69031808 Apr 1998 DE
19853834 May 2000 DE
102011088158 May 2000 DE
69634921 Dec 2005 DE
201 22 639 Nov 2006 DE
10 2006 040 305 Mar 2007 DE
102006029298 Dec 2007 DE
102007040755 Mar 2009 DE
102007047326 Apr 2009 DE
102011053205 Mar 2013 DE
102011088158 Jun 2013 DE
102015006363 Dec 2016 DE
102015008860 Jan 2017 DE
102015011503 Mar 2017 DE
102015011790 Mar 2017 DE
361847 Apr 1990 EP
0431924 Jun 1991 EP
1415792 May 2004 EP
1457590 Sep 2004 EP
1381504 Aug 2007 EP
2774693 Sep 2014 EP
WO2015040327 Mar 2015 FR
2297516 Aug 1996 GB
S62275734 Nov 1987 JP
H0889780 Apr 1996 JP
2003136605 May 2003 JP
2004082206 Mar 2004 JP
2009202451 Sep 2009 JP
0140866 Jun 2001 WO
2001078969 Oct 2001 WO
2004014637 Feb 2004 WO
2006100166 Sep 2006 WO
2008049384 May 2008 WO
2008061520 May 2008 WO
2011063786 Jun 2011 WO
2013075696 May 2013 WO
2014090207 Jun 2014 WO
2014166469 Oct 2014 WO
2014078430 Jun 2015 WO
2015081926 Jun 2015 WO
2015085983 Jun 2015 WO
2015090265 Jun 2015 WO
2015090567 Jun 2015 WO
2015096826 Jul 2015 WO
2015149742 Oct 2015 WO
2015180703 Dec 2015 WO
2016019937 Feb 2016 WO
2016019942 Feb 2016 WO
WO2016040453 Mar 2016 WO
2016058577 Apr 2016 WO
2016095888 Jun 2016 WO
2016101942 Jun 2016 WO
2016146095 Sep 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
US 4,937,420 A, 06/1990, Deckard (withdrawn)
Marcus et al., Solid Freedom Fabrication Proceedings, Nov. 1993.
Cima et al., “Computer-derived Microstructures by 3D Printing: Bio- and Structural Materials,” SFF Symposium, Austin, TX, 1994.
Marcus, et al., Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, Sep. 1995, p. 130-133.
Gebhart, Rapid Protytyping, pp. 118-119, 1996.
Feature Article—Rapid Tooling—Cast Resin and Sprayed Metal Tooling by Joel Segal, Apr. 2000.
EOS Operating Manual for Laser Sintering Machine with Brief Summary Feb. 22, 2005.
Sachs, E., P. Williams, D. Brancazio, M. Cima, and K. Kremmin, Three dimensional printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model. In Proceedings of Manufacturing International 1990 (Atlant, GA, Mar. 25-28). ASME, New York, 1990, pp. 131-136.
Sachs et al., “Three-Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 143-151, Jan. 1990.
Williams, “Feasibility Study of Investment Casting Pattern Design by Means of Three Dimensional Printing”, Department of Mechanical Engineering, abstract only; Sep. 25, 2001.
Armin Scharf, “Erster 3D-Endlosdrucker”, zwomp.de, http://www.zwomp.de/2012/11/06/voxeljet-endlosdrucker/ dated Nov. 6, 2012.
Voxeljet's VXconcept—Continuous 3D printing for sand casting, You-Tube, Nov. 16, 2011, XP002713379, retrieved from the Internet URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgIrNXZjIxU retrieved on Sep. 23, 2013.
Screen shots of URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgIrNXZjIxU taken in approximately 5 second intervals on Nov. 12, 2015.
Jacobs et al., 2005 SME Technical Paper, title “Are QuickCast Patterns Suitable for Limited Production?”.
European Search Report, EP Application No. 16200616, dated May 18, 2017.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170151727 A1 Jun 2017 US