This application is a national phase filing under 35 USC §371 from PCT Application serial number PCT/DE2011/000378 filed on Apr. 10, 2011, and claims priority therefrom. This application further claims priority from DE 10 2010 015 45.2 filed on Apr. 1 , 2010 both incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a method for manufacturing three-dimensional models as expressed in the generic concept of patent claims 1 and 14 as well as a device as expressed in the generic concept of patent claim 16.
A method for producing three-dimensional objects from computer data is known from the prior art, for example, from the European patent specification EP 0 431 924 B1. In the method described therein, a particulate material is deposited in a thin layer onto a platform, and a binder material is selectively printed on the particulate material, using a print head. The particle area onto which the hinder is printed sticks together and solidifies under the influence of the binder and, if necessary, an additional hardener. The platform is then lowered by a distance of one layer thickness into a build cylinder and provided with a new layer of particulate material, which is also printed as described above. These steps are repeated until a certain, desired height of the object is achieved. A three-dimensional object is thereby produced from the printed and solidified areas of the particulate material.
After it is completed, this object produced from solidified particulate material is embedded in loose particulate material and is subsequently removed from the process chamber and freed from loose particulate material. This is done, for example, using an extractor. This leaves the desired objects, from which the remaining particulate material is removed, e.g. by brushing.
Other particulate material-supported rapid prototyping processes work in a similar manner, such as, for example, selective laser sintering or electron beam sintering, in which a loose particulate material is also deposited in layers and selectively solidified with the aid of a controlled physical radiation source.
All these methods are referred to collectively below as “three-dimensional printing methods” or “3D printing methods”.
All the mentioned embodiments have in common a detailed manufacturing process for the desired products. The first step always consists of generating a filled volume, which contains the components, in the aforementioned process chamber. An example could be a powder feedstock. Further individual sequentially ordered steps follow, such as the removal of particulate material in order to obtain the desired final components.
In various further publications, such as patents WO2004014637A1 or U.S. Pat. No. 7,291,002 B2, at least the build process is considered and a continuous operation for this purpose is suggested. Included in such is that the build platform is continuously lowered and the layer application is implemented in a screwing movement over the build area. However, in addition to the high equipment costs, also with this method, only one step is completed after termination of the build process. The removal of the unbound particulate material proceeds again in a subsequent, separate process.
The object of the invention is to provide a method and a device with which it is possible to continuously carry out diverse work steps.
This object is achieved by a method according to patent claims 1 and 14 as well as a device according to patent claim 16.
According to one aspect of the present invention is a method for producing three-dimensional objects, using a three-dimensional printing method based on computer-provided data, whereby a material is deposited in layers in a process chamber and the material is selectively solidified and/or bonded using a bonding apparatus and/or a solidification apparatus in the process chamber, these steps being repeated.
In hereby doing so, a conveyance of the first material proceeds during the build process and proceeds continuously sequentially and uniformly up to an unpacking position. Whereby “continuous” according to the invention does not mean that the conveyance always takes place with the same speed. Depending on the design, the conveyance can also proceed in steps.
The first material can include any imaginable material that can be deposited layerwise. This could be e.g. a powder material, a film material or a fluid material, for example a melted extrusion and/or a dripped material as used with the known Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process.
If a particulate material is now provided as a first material, then, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for producing three-dimensional objects could be provided that uses a three-dimensional printing method based on computer-provided data, whereby a material is deposited in layers with the aid of a spreader device in a process chamber onto a particulate material feedstock and the particulate material is selectively solidified using a solidification apparatus in the process chamber, those steps being repeated until a desired object is obtained and unpacked.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the build process includes the application of a first material layer and, if required, the solidification of certain areas, according to the computer data provided.
The conveyance of the first material continuously, sequentially and uniformly up to an unpacking position including during the build process enables the continuous and to some degree simultaneous implementation of multiple work steps. Such a device can also be operated infinitely.
Whereby conveyance, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, does not mean only the execution of a first material. It could also well be that the spreader unit and the solidification unit are moved over the layers of the first material and, consequently, an area of a process chamber or build-up space and with it also an unpacking position is constantly shifted and thereby the first material is conveyed according to kinematic reversal.
It is thus proposed to dispense with a lowerable build platform during operation of the method and instead of this to produce a continuous material layer stack or even a particulate material feedstock, for example. This material layer stack or particulate material feedstock with built objects, if applicable, can on one side have already exited a process space as well as the unpacking position, while on the other side the build process of objects is still being executed.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, in a method according to the invention, a conveyance direction essentially remains up to the unpacking position. According to the invention, this should foe understood to mean that the conveyance may well exhibit slight direction changes, such as curves. However, no direction reversal is to take place. Since the conveyance process is continuous, the conveyance speed also remains essentially the same.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, it may prove advantageous if the spreader device, respectively the means for application for the first material, and a deposited material layer of the first material are such provided that the means for application and said material layer are moved toward each other relatively for said application of a further material layer that a reception plane of the material layer exhibits an angle of >0° to a layer plane of the means for application.
The use of particulate material could e.g. include such that the spreader device and the particulate material feedstock are such provided that said spreader device and feedstock are moved toward each other relatively for application of a further material layer that a reception plane of a particulate material reception means exhibits an angle of >0° to a layer plane of the spreader device.
Especially preferred is the selection of an angle less than or equal to an angle of repose of the particulate material.
Depending on the method and manner in which the material is moved forward, it may be helpful under circumstances if the solidification apparatus creates structures in the material, especially auxiliary structures, which hamper the sliding away of material in the process space. Such an embodiment can yet further stabilize the material layers.
When using particulate material, the method according to the invention can preferably be executed in such a way that first particulate material is introduced in a feedstock in a process chamber and then a build process of an object begins on this particulate material feedstock.
According to an especially preferred embodiment of the present invention, it may be provided that after removal from the process space, the objects created are e.g. unpacked from the particulate material without interrupting the build process.
According to an especially preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention, solid material is deposited in the form of thin films.
These films can, for example, be connected to each other by means of gluing and/or welding.
Besides that, it is also possible that the solidification apparatus creates structures that facilitate the automatic unpacking of the components.
By so doing, the method according to the invention can be executed continuously. That means that a build process of the object takes place in the layers of the material in a process space or process area and the material layers are always transported with the objects and the build process can be carried out infinitely. After conducting the objects out from the process space area, these can be e.g. unpacked and removed from any conveyance means if the material is moved according to a preferred embodiment via a conveyance means. In this regard, conveyance can proceed either continuously and/or discontinuously.
For example, it is conceivable that the conveyance runs ad infinitum.
It is also possible that the material moves horizontally or horizontally with an angle.
According to a further aspect, the invention also relates to a method for continuously producing three-dimensional objects using computer-provided data, whereby a material is deposited on a movable material reception means and on one side of the material an object or multiple objects are formed by repeated application of layers of the material and subsequent solidification and/or binding of the material and repetition of these steps, the object or objects on the material reception means are continuously moved out of a process area during the production process and unpacked on the material reception means during the production process.
It may prove advantageous if the layer plane exhibits an angle of >0° to a reception plane of the reception means.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, a device for producing three-dimensional objects using computer-provided data is described. Whereby a material is deposited in layers using a spreader device and selectively solidified using a solidification apparatus and these steps are repeated.
If, for instance, particulate material is used as the layer material, then it may be provided that such a device deposits particulate material in layers with the aid Of a spreader device on a particulate material feedstock and the particulate material is selectively solidified using a solidification apparatus and these steps are repeated.
To do so, means are provided to convey the material during the build process continuously and sequentially up to an unpacking position.
Moreover, it is conceivable that the material includes film material, extrusion material and/or a fluid.
Preferably, it may also be provided that the solidification apparatus can be a drop generator and/or a radiation source.
In this regard, a second material can be self-curing, for example, when coming in contact with the particulate material. Or the particulate material can be mixed with a substance that leads to the solidification of the material upon contact. It is also conceivable that the second material cures by means of UV radiation or supply of heat or in the presence of a gas.
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the spreader device and/or the solidification apparatus are moved on a coordinate system arranged at an angle perpendicular to the reception plane of the reception means.
If a particulate material is used, then preferably the angle selected for the coordinate system is smaller than the angle of repose of the particulate material.
In so doing, according to an especially preferred embodiment of the present invention, the angle of the feedstock favors freeing the objects after the build process by means of sliding off of particulate material.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the material is moved on a conveyor, whereby this may advantageously have one or multiple conveyor belts.
Furthermore it also possible that the conveyor has a chain conveyor.
In order to design the device somewhat smaller, it can also be provided that it is provided with limitations of the material layers.
In this regard and if needed, these material layers can be stabilized by means of limitation walls on both sides as well as above.
On the front sides, the layer material or the feedstock (if using particulate material) are respectively accessible. A spreader device that deposits new particulate material onto the feedstock is mounted on the one front side. To do so, the spreader device moves over the feedstock at the angle alpha to the horizontal, which is less than the angle of repose of the particulate material. It is thereby ensured that the layer of newly deposited particulate material remains at the desired site and does not slip off. The angle alpha can advantageously be adjusted on the device in order to harmonize this to the particulate material. In addition, on this side a device is mounted that selectively solidifies the particulate material alongside the particulate material plane defined by the spreader device. This solidification apparatus can be a print head, which releases small fluid droplets on the particulate material with the result that the particulate material solidifies there in a locally demarcated manner. Other devices can alternatively be employed, such as a radiation source for high energy beams.
After completion of a layer comprised of a coating and subsequent solidification, the feedstock is further transported a distance determined by the layer thickness. This can proceed with the aid of a conveyor belt on which the feedstock rests.
It would be possible to also design the bordering surfaces on the sides of the feedstock as synchronous conveyor belts, Examples of other conveyance options include the use of form-fitting conveyor chains, which only partially engage with the feedstock, e.g. via adapters, and move these forward layer thickness by layer thickness.
Subsequent to completion of the current layer and after the print head and spreader device have moved into a park position, it is also conceivable that an assembly line tray be used that comes in contact with the feedstock and pushes it forward layer thickness by layer thickness in the direction of the other free end.
In all its described embodiments, a device according to the invention is simpler to construct than the described state of technology. This is due to several points. On the one hand, the quantity of moving particulate material during continuous operation is nearly constant and does not increase as is the case with devices of the prior art. That simplifies guideways and drives since these can be designed for a constant operating point. On the other hand, the movement of the particulate material feedstock and the reception of the forces of its own weight that it exerts are separate from one another. The feedstock rests on an underlay and does not have to be moved in the gravitational direction at all or only to a small degree.
To prevent slipping down of the feedstock, a grid structure can be printed along with it. This stabilises the particulate material feedstock and also helps to hinder the uncontrolled discharge of the particulate material in the break-out zone later on.
The length of the feedstock from the printing and/or coating unit right up to the exiting from the process space, respectively, the exiting from the process space and arrival in the unpacking area, for instance at a side opposite the process space, can be adapted to the respective solidification process. The length can be designed in a way that the feedstock remains a certain retention period in a contiguous situation to e.g. give the liquid time to react with the particulate material, thereby developing adequate stability. it is also possible that the solidification process requires heat or produces heat. Heat could be introduced by e.g. a pre-heated particulate material or e.g. radiation sources, which warm the coating plane in which the feedstock is to be introduced. In this case, the retention period can be used to allow the feedstock to cool down in a controlled fashion from the side opposite the solidification zone. There are also conceivable cases where both effects are jointly used. In both cases, a gradient results that conforms to the layer-building and passes through the feedstock.
In contrast to the discontinuous methods, in this case the layers reach the break-out zone in the same sequence as they were built. The retention period can thus be held nearly constant in the particulate material feedstock for all areas. This is a great advantage since in this way the curing can proceed in a much more controlled manner and is thereby accompanied by less delay than with devices according to the state of technology.
At the second free end, a break-out zone (unpacking position) is connected, in which unbound parts of the particulate material are removed. This can proceed manually or e.g. automatically with suctioning and/or blowing off. In so doing, the break-out zone should be dimensioned long enough in the layer-building direction that also larger objects can be completely removed and that interruptions in break-out activities even lasting longer periods of time do not necessarily have to lead to a termination of the layer building process simply because the feedstock reaches the end of the device.
Since the components can be laid stacked over one another in the direction of gravity, it may fee required to embed the components with support structures that also have to be built and that are able to develop sufficient backing effect even in the absence of surrounding particulate material and to hold the components in position until they are removed.
Moreover, the break-out zone can be designed in such a manner that a great deal of the unbound particulate material can flow off freely. For example, this can take the form of a perforated underlay and/or may be achieved alone due to the absence of the lateral limitation walls.
The break-out zone can have auxiliary means such as nozzles pressurized with compressed air or other fluids, which are aimed at the particulate material feedstock and support the conveying away of unbound particulate material during operation. The discharge of particulate material in the break-out zone can also be supported by input of mechanical energy, such as vibrations, for example.
If the particulate material is reusable in the process, then it can be collected in the break-out zone and again fed into the application process after a possible pass through a preparation section. In the preparation section, it may also be necessary to perform a sifting of the particulate material and/or a regulated feed-in of fresh particulate material.
In this case, the device has the advantage over the state of technology in that the application zone and the break-out zone are both present and united in a single device and the material flows can thus be executed and controlled easily. Due to the continuous operation, only a relatively small quantity of particulate material needs to be buffered if the corresponding particulate material is reused. If reusability of particulate material is completely implemented, then only a particulate material quantity corresponding to that of the solidified quantity needs to be supplied to the process.
In the case of horizontal orientation of the conveyance plane, the solidification period, respectively, the break-out period only affects the length of the device.
However, the coordinate system of the layer building is not Cartesian, but rather distorted by the angle of repose.
In cases of a very small angle of repose of the particulate material, this can lead to highly distorted building spaces, respectively, process chambers, which in turn can lead to prolongation of the process duration required per component. It can therefore make sense to tilt the conveyance plane at a beta angle in relation to the horizontal and, by so doing, correctly reset the coordinate system. This has the additional advantage that the feedstock's own weight acts in the conveyance direction and thereby reduces the force required to move the feedstock.
In this case, the angle of repose in the break-out zone acts against the gradient conveyance plane. This means that the particulate material tends to flow out of the solidification zone. In the worst case, when the angle of repose is the same as the beta angle, the solidification zone will completely flow out if no countermeasures are taken, such as provision of printed compartments or a grid or honeycomb structure.
In both cases, it is necessary to set an auxiliary plate on the conveyance plane when starting the system, which enables the application of the first layers. This auxiliary plate takes over the alpha angle of repose and is pulled through the solidification zone by the conveyor until the end of the break-out space is reached and the auxiliary plate can be easily removed.
No special measures need to be observed, however, when shutting down the system. The free end of the feedstock is simply pulled through the solidification zone into the break-out area.
Such a system enables the processing of a multitude of different materials. Besides fluids, film material and extrusion material, possible materials also include sand, gypsum, metal particulate material or other inorganic particulate materials as well as plastic particulate material, flour and other organic particulate materials.
The system and the process permit a wide spectrum of varied applications, such as e.g. the manufacture of molds and models for metal casting as well as the production of components of the most diverse types. Likewise, an interesting advantage is that the continuous procedure also allows production of longer components without having to modify the device.
In general, its basic principle of essentially running horizontally in the “Z-axis” makes it suitable for ail solid processing layer processes. That means that the principle can function anywhere where the deposited material has already developed sufficient stability shortly after application so that it does not slide away sideways due to its own weight.
According to the present invention, the material application types can vary.
A method according to the invention can be implemented more simply than a method on devices of the state of technology.
In contrast to devices according to the state of technology, the movement of the device for layer positioning must not proceed rapidly because positioning runs with long paths are no longer needed. A consequence, of such is that a discontinuous switching device may also be used. This involves moving one layer thickness after a spreading process. One example could be a pneumatic actuator. The layer thickness is controlled by means of end stops. Levers or gears can be used to translate the movement. Especially preferred is an indexing clutch in combination with a lever that is actuated by means of a pneumatic cylinder.
For the purpose of more detailed explanation, the invention is described in further detail below on the basis of preferred embodiments with reference to the drawing.
In the drawing:
In
If the solidification is not immediately effected, but rather with a certain time delay, then special circumstances are to be taken into consideration with the method according to the state of technology.
As an example that can be derived from
Commissioning:
Creation of a basic feedstock—The spreader device (2) applies one layer comparable to that shown in
This coating process is repeated until sufficient filling is present to obtain the desired dimensions for component (4) being manufactured. In this manner a feedstock results, which is smooth on the spreader device side and fissured on the opposite-facing side in accordance with the particulate material properties.
Continuous Build Process:
If a basic feedstock is created, then a continuous build process can begin that only requires termination when the device is stopped for maintenance purposes. The process is designed to a great degree along the lines of the state of technology.
In a process chamber the spreader device (2) creates a layer that forms an angle α in relation to the perpendicular (5). At the conclusion, a predetermined quantity of particulate material is selectively solidified using the solidification apparatus (1). The process chamber is in this sense not a delineated room, but rather the space in which the object is built; the object is subsequently removed from this area, respectively process chamber.
The computer data processing must take this arrangement into consideration. The conveyor belt (11) is thereafter moved one layer thickness further so that the feedstock moves out from the spreader device plane and hereby gradually moves out of the process chamber. This process repeats itself until the device is shut down. Located in the feedstock are the components (4), which are ever further removed from the spreader device plane by the infeed movement.
After a certain distance on the conveyor belt (11), the components can be unpacked, while the build process continues uninterrupted in the process chamber. The length of this distance of the conveyor belt (11) hereby depends on the process employed. For instance, cooling is relevant when dealing with sintering processes. The curing time is relevant in cases of chemical solidification mechanisms.
In addition, the ejection of components (4) and the unbound particulate material from special areas may proceed in this area, such as, for example, protective gas atmospheres.
The unpacking itself can take place manually on the device or via discharge of the particulate material.
Shutting Down:
If the device is to be shut down for maintenance purposes, the entire feedstock can be brought on the conveyor belt (11) and out of the process chamber by moving the conveyor belt (11).
The angle (13) between the conveyor belt (11) and the spreader device plane is limited by the angle of repose of the particulate material (
If the angle of repose (12) is exceeded by the device according to the invention, then the smooth surfaces in the particulate material areas (18) created by the spreader device (2) break out so that no defined surfaces exist any longer for the solidification process. One method to address this problem is described in the following:
Another preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in
The described continuous production principle is also suitable for the construction of an entirely automated production system. This is represented in
Further conveyance means are depicted in
A plate-link belt is shown as a conveyance means in
The use of magazine belts (see
The film layers can be thin rolls (38) made of paper, metal as well as of plastic. They are applied on a workpiece being run (36), which is moved essentially horizontally on a conveyor belt (11).
The application plane of the layer body proceeds with an angle less than 90° in relation to the movement direction.
The films (34) are applied onto the layer body and thereupon connected by means of e.g. gluing, welding or similar means. The contour of the component is cut out of the respective layer e.g. with a laser (37). The cutting can either take place before or after the application step. If it fakes place after the application step, then the depth of the cut must be checked. To facilitate unpacking, the aid of a hot-wire saw (39) can be employed for auxiliary cuts, which divide the surrounding film material into smaller units. The auxiliary cuts can, for example, be executed in the shape of rectangles. On complicated structures, the rectangles can be further reduced in size in order to better access the contour.
If the current film layer (34) is applied and cut, then the infeed is actuated and the layer bodies are further transported by one layer thickness. The layer body should have reached a certain length in order to stably store the components or models (35) located there. If the layer body has reached this minimum length in the conveyor direction (11), then removal of the excess film can be begun on the end opposite the film application plane in order to break out the actual components. The removal can then proceed manually. The advantage of this build-up type lies in the quasi-infinite operation of the system.
In order to start up the system, an angle or workplace (36) is needed upon which the first layers (34) are applied. The angle is needed until the layer body (35) being built up with layers acquires sufficient inherent strength and can bear its own weight without deforming.
According to the embodiment shown, another nozzle (43) is provided for the application of support material (44). The whole unit is thereby moved forward again on a conveyor belt (11). Since such a method forms an endless block, the finished part areas must be separated for removal, for example, by means of a hotwire saw (39).
The print heads (42, 43), which can generate individual drops of two different materials, are moved in a layer application plane over the layer body (35) and dispense the build material and support material (44) corresponding to the contour data issued by the computer. The support material (44) should hereby ensure that at least the layer body's (35) own weight can be supported on the conveyance unit (11).
An endlessly continuous method for a 3D printing process, during which the material is directly deposited with a print head (45), is depicted in
A device used to accomplish this can be simplified for such a method.
In contrast to devices according to the state of technology, the movement of the device for layer positioning must not proceed rapidly because positioning runs with long paths are no longer needed. As mentioned above, a consequence of such is that a discontinuous switching device may also be used. Possible embodiments are depicted in
A powder feedstock (46) is provided on a conveyor belt (11).
In order to move one layer thickness after a coating process, the entire conveyor belt is moved in such a manner using the drive roller that the application plane approaches the drive roller as per the desired layer thickness. The torque required for this and the angle of rotation can be applied using a lever (48) that is connected with a drive roller via an overrunning clutch (47). The lever can be e.g. actuated by means of a pneumatic cylinder (49). The layer thickness itself is then specified by the travelling distance of the cylinder. This can be delimited by end stops.
Other gear stages (51) may make sense depending on the required torque moments required, The layer thickness due to elasticity and slackness can be determined during commissioning and the desired target layer thickness can be set.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 015 451 | Apr 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2011/000378 | 4/10/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/9/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/127897 | 10/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3935339 | Cooke, Jr. | Jan 1976 | A |
4247508 | Housholder | Jan 1981 | A |
4369025 | Von Der Weid | Jan 1983 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4591402 | Evans et al. | May 1986 | A |
4600733 | Ohashi et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4665492 | Masters | May 1987 | A |
4669634 | Leroux | Jun 1987 | A |
4711669 | Paul et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4752352 | Feygin | Jun 1988 | A |
4752498 | Fudim | Jun 1988 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Aug 1989 | A |
4938816 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4944817 | Bourell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5017753 | Deckard | May 1991 | A |
5031120 | Pomerantz et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047182 | Sundback et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053090 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059266 | Yamane et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5076869 | Bourell et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5089186 | Moore | Feb 1992 | A |
5120476 | Scholz | Jun 1992 | A |
5126529 | Weiss et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127037 | Bynum | Jun 1992 | A |
5132143 | Deckard | Jul 1992 | A |
5134569 | Masters | Jul 1992 | A |
5136515 | Helinski | Aug 1992 | A |
5140937 | Yamane et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5147587 | Marcus et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149548 | Yamane et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155324 | Deckard et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156697 | Bourell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5182170 | Marcus et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5204055 | Sachs et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5216616 | Masters | Jun 1993 | A |
5229209 | Gharapetian et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5248456 | Evans, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252264 | Forderhase et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263130 | Pomerantz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269982 | Brotz | Dec 1993 | A |
5284695 | Barlow et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296062 | Bourell et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316580 | Deckard | May 1994 | A |
5324617 | Majima et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5340656 | Sachs et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342919 | Dickens, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352405 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354414 | Feygin | Oct 1994 | A |
5382308 | Bourell et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387380 | Cima et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5398193 | deAngelis | Mar 1995 | A |
5418112 | Mirle et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427722 | Fouts et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431967 | Manthiram et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433261 | Hinton | Jul 1995 | A |
5482659 | Sauerhoefer | Jan 1996 | A |
5490962 | Cima et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503785 | Crump et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506607 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518060 | Cleary et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518680 | Cima et al. | May 1996 | A |
5555176 | Menhennett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573055 | Melling et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573721 | Gillette | Nov 1996 | A |
5589222 | Thometzek et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5597589 | Deckard | Jan 1997 | A |
5616294 | Deckard | Apr 1997 | A |
5616631 | Kiuchi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5637175 | Feygin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639070 | Deckard | Jun 1997 | A |
5639402 | Barlow et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647931 | Retallick et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658412 | Retallick et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5717599 | Menhennett et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730925 | Mattes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740051 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747105 | Haubert | May 1998 | A |
5749041 | Lakshminarayan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753274 | Wilkening et al. | May 1998 | A |
5807437 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837373 | Siak et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837960 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851465 | Bredt | Dec 1998 | A |
5884688 | Hinton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897825 | Fruth et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902441 | Bredt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5902537 | Almquist et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904889 | Serbin et al. | May 1999 | A |
5934343 | Gaylo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940674 | Sachs et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943235 | Earl et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6007318 | Russell et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6036777 | Sachs | Mar 2000 | A |
6042774 | Wilkening et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048188 | Hull et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048954 | Barlow et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6116517 | Heinzl et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6133353 | Bui et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146567 | Sachs et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147138 | Hochsmann et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155331 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164850 | Speakman | Dec 2000 | A |
6165406 | Jang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169605 | Penn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175422 | Penn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193922 | Ederer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210625 | Matsushita | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216508 | Matsubara et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217816 | Tang | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6259962 | Gothait | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270335 | Leyden et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6305769 | Thayer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318418 | Grossmann et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316060 | Elvidge et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6322728 | Brodkin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335052 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6335097 | Otsuka et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350495 | Schriener et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355196 | Kotnis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375874 | Russell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395811 | Nguyen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401001 | Jang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403002 | Van Der Geest | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405095 | Jang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416850 | Bredt et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423255 | Hoechsmann et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436334 | Hattori et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460979 | Heinzl et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467525 | Herreid et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476122 | Leyden | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485831 | Fukushima et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500378 | Smith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6554600 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6596224 | Sachs et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610429 | Bredt et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616030 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658314 | Gothait | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672343 | Perret et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6713125 | Sherwood et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722872 | Swanson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733528 | Abe et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6742456 | Kasperchik et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764636 | Allanic et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6827988 | Krause et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830643 | Hayes | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6838035 | Ederer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6855205 | McQuate et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6896839 | Kubo et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6972115 | Ballard | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6989115 | Russell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004222 | Ederer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7037382 | Davidson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048530 | Gaillard et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049363 | Shen | May 2006 | B2 |
7087109 | Bredt et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7120512 | Kramer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137431 | Ederer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7153463 | Leuterer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7204684 | Ederer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220380 | Farr et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7291002 | Russell et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296990 | Devos et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7332537 | Bredt et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348075 | Farr et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7378052 | Harryson | May 2008 | B2 |
7381360 | Oriakhi et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387359 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402330 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7431987 | Pfeiffer et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435072 | Collins et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435368 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455804 | Patel et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455805 | Oriakhi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7497977 | Nielsen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531117 | Ederer et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7550518 | Bredt et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578958 | Patel et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7597835 | Marsac | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608672 | Hachikian | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7641461 | Khoshnevis | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7665636 | Ederer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722802 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7807077 | Ederer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736578 | Ederer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748971 | Hochsmann et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767130 | Elsner et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795349 | Bredt et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799253 | Höschmann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7879393 | Ederer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887264 | Naunheimer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7927539 | Ederer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8020604 | Hochsmann et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8096262 | Ederer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8186415 | Marutani et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8349233 | Ederer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8506870 | Hochsmann et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8574485 | Kramer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8715832 | Ederer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727672 | Ederer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8741194 | Ederer et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8911226 | Gunther et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8951033 | Höchsmann et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956140 | Hartmann | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956144 | Grasegger et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8992205 | Ederer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9174392 | Hartmann | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9242413 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9321934 | Mögele et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9327450 | Hein et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9333709 | Hartmann | May 2016 | B2 |
9358701 | Gnuchtel et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20010045678 | Kubo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010050031 | Bredt et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016387 | Shen | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026982 | Bredt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020079601 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090410 | Tochimoto et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111707 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020155254 | McQuate et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167100 | Moszner et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004599 | Herbak | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065400 | Beam et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069638 | Barlow et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083771 | Schmidt | May 2003 | A1 |
20030113729 | DaQuino et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114936 | Sherwood et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040003738 | Imiolek et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012112 | Davidson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025905 | Ederer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040026418 | Ederer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035542 | Ederer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036200 | Patel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038009 | Noel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040045941 | Herzog et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056378 | Bredt et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084814 | Boyd et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094058 | Kasperchik et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104515 | Swanson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138336 | Bredt et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145088 | Patel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170765 | Ederer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187714 | Napadensky et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207123 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239009 | Collins et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003189 | Bredt et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017386 | Harrysson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017394 | Hochsmann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050074511 | Oriakhi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093194 | Oriakhi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050167872 | Tsubaki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050174407 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050179167 | Hachikian | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050212163 | Bausinger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218549 | Farr et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050280185 | Russell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060105102 | Hochsmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108090 | Ederer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060159896 | Pfeifer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175346 | Ederer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208388 | Bredt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237159 | Hochsmann | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251535 | Pfeifer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254467 | Farr et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070045891 | Martinoni | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070057412 | Weiskopf et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126157 | Bredt | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070238056 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241482 | Giller et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080001331 | Ederer | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018018 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080047628 | Davidson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080138515 | Williams | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080187711 | Alam et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080233302 | Elsner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237933 | Hochmann et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080241404 | Allaman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260945 | Ederer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090011066 | Davidson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090068376 | Philippi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090261497 | Ederer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100007062 | Larsson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100212584 | Ederer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207288 | Enrico | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243123 | Voxeljet | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244301 | Ederer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100247742 | Shi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272519 | Ederer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279007 | Briselden et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291314 | Kashani-Shirazi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100323301 | Tang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110049739 | Uckelmann | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059247 | Kuzusako et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110177188 | Bredt et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110223437 | Ederer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110308755 | Hochsmann | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046779 | Pax | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120094026 | Ederer et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097258 | Hartmann et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113439 | Ederer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126457 | Abe et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120291701 | Grasegger et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130000549 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004610 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130026680 | Ederer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029001 | Gunther et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130092082 | Ederer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130189434 | Randall et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130199444 | Hartmann | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234355 | Hartmann et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130302575 | Mogele et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313757 | Kashani-Shirazi | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140048980 | Crump et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140202381 | Ederer et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140202382 | Ederer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140212677 | Gnuchtel et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140227123 | Gunster | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140271961 | Khoshnevis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140306379 | Hartmann et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140322501 | Ederer et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150042018 | Gunther et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150069659 | Ederer et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150110910 | Hartmann et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150165574 | Ederer et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150210822 | Ederer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150224718 | Ederer et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150266238 | Ederer et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150273572 | Ederer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150290881 | Ederer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150375418 | Hartmann | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375419 | Gunther et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160001507 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160052165 | Hartmann | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160052166 | Hartmann | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160107386 | Hartmann et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160114533 | Grassegger et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160263828 | Ederer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160303762 | Gunther | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160311167 | Gunther et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160311210 | Gunther et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
720255 | May 2000 | AU |
3221357 | Dec 1983 | DE |
3930750 | Mar 1991 | DE |
4102260 | Jul 1992 | DE |
4305201 | Apr 1994 | DE |
29506204.5 | Jun 1995 | DE |
4440397 | Sep 1995 | DE |
19525307 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19530295 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19528215 | Feb 1997 | DE |
29701279 | May 1997 | DE |
19545167 | Jun 1997 | DE |
69031808 | Apr 1998 | DE |
19853834 | May 2000 | DE |
69634921 | Dec 2005 | DE |
10 2006 040 305 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102006029298 | Dec 2007 | DE |
102006030350 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102007040755 | Mar 2009 | DE |
102007047326 | Apr 2009 | DE |
102011053205 | Mar 2013 | DE |
102015006363 | Dec 2015 | DE |
0361847 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0431924 | Jun 1991 | EP |
1415792 | May 2004 | EP |
1442870 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2289462 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2790418 | Sep 2000 | FR |
2382798 | Jun 2003 | GB |
S62275734 | Nov 1987 | JP |
2003136605 | May 2003 | JP |
2004082206 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2009202451 | Sep 2009 | JP |
9518715 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9605038 | Feb 1996 | WO |
0021736 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0051809 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0134371 | May 2001 | WO |
0140866 | Jun 2001 | WO |
02064353 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02064354 | Aug 2002 | WO |
03016030 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03016067 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004010907 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004014637 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006100166 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2008049384 | May 2008 | WO |
2008061520 | May 2008 | WO |
2011063786 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2013075696 | May 2013 | WO |
2014090207 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014166469 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015081926 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015085983 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015090265 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015090567 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015096826 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015078430 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015149742 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015180703 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016019937 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016019942 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016058577 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016095888 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016101942 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016146095 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 4,937,420, 06/1990, Deckard (withdrawn) |
Cima et al., “Computer-derived Microstructures by 3D Printing: Bio- and Structural Materials,” SFF Symposium, Austin, TX. 1994. |
Sachs et al., “Three-Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 131-136. |
Sachs et al., “Three-Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 143 & 151, Jan. 1990. |
Jacobs et al., 2005 SME Technical Paper, title “Are QuickCast Patterns Suitable for Limited Production?” |
Feature Article—Rapid Tooling—Cast Resin and Sprayed Metal Tooling by Joel Segal, Apr. 2000. |
Williams, “Feasibility Study of Investment Casting Pattern Design by Means of Three Dimensional Printing”, Department of Mechanical Engineering, pp. 2-15, Jun. 1987. |
Gebhart, Rapid Prototyping, pp. 118-119, 1996. |
Marcus et al., Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, Nov. 1993. |
Marcus, et al., Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, Sep. 1995, p. 130-33. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/DE2011/000378, dated Apr. 10, 2011. |
EOS Operating Manual for Laser Sintering Machine with Brief Summary. |
EOS Operating Manual for Laser Sintering Machine, Part 1 with Brief Summary, Feb. 22, 2005. |
EOS Operating Manual for Laser Sintering Machine, Part 2 with Brief Summary, Feb. 22, 2005. |
Voxeljet's VXconcept—Continuous 3D printing for sand casting, You-Tube, Nov. 16, 2011, XP002713379, retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgIrNXZjIxU retrieved on Sep. 23, 2013. |
Screen shots of URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgIrNXZjIxU taken in approximately 5 second intervals on Nov. 12, 2015. |
Armin Scharf, “Erster 3D-Endlosdrucker”, zwomp.de, http://www.zwomp.de/2012/11/06/voxeljet-endlosdrucker/ dated Nov. 6, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130026680 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |