Method and device for radar applications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10254385
  • Patent Number
    10,254,385
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 24, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 9, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A device for radar applications includes a computing engine, a radar acquisition unit connected to the computing engine, a timer unit connected to the computing engine, a cascade input port, and a cascade output port. The cascade input port is configured to convey an input signal to the computing engine and the cascade output port is configured to convey an output signal from the computing engine. Further, an according system, a radar system, a vehicle with such radar system and a method are provided.
Description
FIELD

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to processing devices, in particular with regard to radar applications.


BACKGROUND

A fast Fourier transform (FFT) is an algorithm to compute the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and its inverse.


Modern radars perform a significant part of signal processing digitally. A common digital signal processing technique is the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Within radar data paths, this algorithm is used in areas such as beam forming, pulse compression and Doppler processing.


With regard to automotive radar applications, FFT accelerators are getting increasingly popular in order to improve real-time processing and, e.g., adaptively controlling the cruise.


SUMMARY

A first embodiment relates to a device for radar applications comprising a computing engine, a radar acquisition unit connected to the computing engine, a timer unit connected to the computing engine, a cascade input port, and a cascade output port. The cascade input port is configured to convey an input signal to the computing engine and the cascade output port is configured to convey an output signal from the computing engine.


A second embodiment relates to a system for processing radar signals comprising a first device and a second device as suggested herein, wherein the cascade output port of the first device is connected to the cascade input port of the second device.


A third embodiment relates to a radar system comprising at least one device as suggested herein and at least one radio frequency unit connected to the radar acquisition unit of the device.


A forth embodiment is directed to a vehicle with a radar system as suggested herein.


A fifth embodiment relates to a method for processing a radar signal comprising converting a radio frequency signal into a digital signal by a radar acquisition unit of a first device. The method further comprises processing the digital signal by a computing engine of the first device, and providing the processed digital signal via a cascade output port of the first device to a cascade input port of a second device.


A sixth embodiment is directed to a device comprising computing means, radar acquisition means connected to the computing means, input means, and output means. The input means is configured to convey an input signal to the computing means and the output means is configured to convey an output signal from the computing means.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments are shown and illustrated with reference to the drawings. The drawings serve to illustrate the basic principle, so that only aspects necessary for understanding the basic principle are illustrated. The drawings are not to scale. In the drawings the same reference characters denote like features.



FIG. 1 shows a schematic architecture of a device that could be operated in a multi-stage of cascaded devices in radar signal processing environment;



FIG. 2 shows a symbolic diagram comprising a cascaded structure of two of the devices shown in FIG. 1; and



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary arrangement of several devices according to FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The solution presented herein allows an efficient way to cascade devices and to organize processing of data in a cascading way, e.g., further processing FFT results instead of raw data. This allows utilizing the computing performance and memory (RAM) provided by a slave device in an efficient manner and to shift processing load from a master device.


Advantageously, in one embodiment the slave and the master device both have similar or identical structure, in particular comprise (at least partially) similar or identical components. This improves the flexibility as a generic device can be provided that—according to its implementation—can be used as master or slave or at different stages of a multi-stage processing chain of cascaded devices. Using substantially identical components in such cascaded application also reduces the costs as only one type of device needs to be provided.



FIG. 1 shows an example diagram of an architecture of a generic device that could be used in a multi-stage processing chain of cascaded devices.


A block 101 provides a radar signal acquisition functionality. For example, a radio-frequency (RF) 105 signal can be fed to this block 101, which is then forwarded to a computing engine 102. The computing engine 102 may be equipped with memory, e.g., read-only memory (ROM) and/or random access memory (RAM). The computing engine 102 may comprise one or more processors. As an option, the device can comprise several computing engines.


A timer unit 103 is connected to the computing engine 102 and to the block 101. In addition, the timer unit 103 can be synchronized with other devices via a pin 104.


The device further comprises a cascade input port 106 that is connected to the computing engine 102 and a cascade output port 107 that is driven by the computing engine 102. Signals or data can be fed to the computing engine 102 via the cascade input port 106 and signals or data can be sent from the computing engine 102 via the cascade output port 107.


The cascade output port 107 may provide a serialization functionality transforming parallel data from the computing engine 102 to serial data. In addition, the output port 107 may provide a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) information for error detection or any other code for error detection or error correction purposes. Furthermore, the cascade output port may add a time information, e.g., a time stamp.


For example, the computing engine 102 may obtain and process data from the block 101 and/or from the cascade input port 106. The cascade output port 107 can be optionally used to convey results determined by the computing engine 102 to an external device and/or for instrumentation purposes. Instrumentation may comprise tracing of internal processing results of the device shown in FIG. 1.


A block 108 for external communication is connected with the computing engine 102 for communicating with external components.


The block 108 may comprise a serial peripheral interface (SPI) for conveying management and/or configuration data. The block 108 may in particular supply a low bandwidth interface for such control purposes.


The device shown in FIG. 1 can be used in a single-chip mode.


As an alternative, several devices according to the one shown in FIG. 1 can be used in cascaded modes, i.e. as a master device and a slave device.



FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram comprising a slave device 201 and a master device 202, wherein each device has the architecture of the device shown in FIG. 1.


A radio frequency signal 203 is fed to the block 101 of the slave device 201 and a radio frequency signal 204 is fed to the block 101 of the master device 202. The timer units 103 of the slave device 201 and the master device 202 are connected; hence, their timers can be synchronized. In addition, the cascade output port 107 of the slave device 201 is connected to the cascade input port 106 of the master device 202. The block 108 of the master device 202 can optionally be connected to the slave device (e.g., for configuration purposes). The block 108 of the master device 202 can also be connected to a global output, e.g., a CAN bus (CAN: controller area network).


The configuration purposes may comprise: setting a computing engine's parameters for FFT operations, booting the computing engine 102 over SPI, configuration of the computing engine 102 (e.g., setting the computing engine 102 to master mode or slave mode), and setting up timers, for example.


It is noted that the unit providing the radio frequency signal (not shown in FIG. 2) could be realized as an integral part of the device. This applies for the radio frequency unit emitting a radar signal as well as detecting the reflected signal and pre-processing such signal, e.g., via at least one analog-to-digital converter.


As another option, the cascade output port 107 of the master device 202 can be used as instrumentation port, e.g., tracing internal data for monitoring purposes.


It is an option that the master device 202 and the slave device 201 are synchronized.


It is another option that the input data fed to the block 101 may be based on different data sources.


It is a further option that the cascade output port of the master device 202 is connected to the cascade input port of the slave device 201. This allows for the master device 202 to provide first and second stage processing.


For example, in a radar application, a distance to a target, a left angle, a right angle and/or a velocity can be determined. Each of these parameters can be used at one stage of processing and an FFT can be conducted at least once for each of the parameters in at least one stage. By cascading the devices, several processing stages can be provided by at least one of the cascaded devices.


Multi-stage processing can be provided based on raw data or signals (also referred to as RF signals from a radar receiver or a radar transceiver), wherein each stage does FFT processing and provides some results which are further processed in a subsequent stage or in a next timeslot.


The devices (e.g., master device 202 and/or slave device 201) may have the same memory structure and/or the same size of memory.


It is a next option that the device, in particular the master device 202 and/or the slave device 201 are bootable via a network, e.g., a network operated via the Internet protocol.


The solution presented herein can combine several devices in parallel and/or in series to provide distributed processing power, e.g., for FFT calculations, which can be combined by another device, which forwards the combined results to a control unit, e.g., a microcontroller or any processing device.


The device may also comprise a CAN bus interface for communicating with additional devices or control units over a bus structure, e.g., in a vehicle.



FIG. 3 shows an alternative block diagram comprising several devices 301 to 304, wherein each device has the architecture of the device shown in FIG. 1. As an option the device 304 could be realized as a common microcontroller or a control unit of, e.g., a vehicle.


An RF signal 306 is fed to the device 301 and an RF signal 307 is fed to the device 302. The RF signals are processed, e.g., converted from an analog into a digital signal, forwarded to and processed by the computing engine 102 of the respective device. The cascade output port 107 of the device 301 is connected to the cascade input port 106 of the device 303 and the cascade output port 107 of the device 302 is connected with the block 101 of the device 303. The cascade output port 107 of the device 303 is connected either to the cascade input port 106 of the device 304 or to the block 101 of the device 304. The cascade output port 107 of the device 304 is fed to a CAN interface 305, which is connected to a CAN bus. The CAN interface 305 could also be part of the device 304 (and/or any of the devices).


It is noted that other communication interfaces can be utilized accordingly, e.g., Internet, FlexRay or the like. It is further noted that the device 304 in FIG. 3 is optional and could be omitted.


The example structure of FIG. 3 bears the advantage, that a single type of device could be used at various stages of a processing chain. Also, at each stage the computing power as well as the memory of the device can be utilized to provide a distributed overall processing capability. This is in particular beneficial in scenarios where several input signals are advantageously pre-processed in order to combine the processed signals at a subsequent stage. A lot of computational power can be spent at an early pre-processing stage, i.e., at a device 301, 302 to obtain parameters (e.g., FFT data), which can be efficiently combined at a next stage 303.


In an example embodiment, the device could be operated in a slave mode obtaining data in a time domain and outputting data in a frequency domain. In an alternative embodiment, the device could be operated in a master mode obtaining data in a time domain or frequency domain and outputting data as transversal FFT data or in a frequency domain. In a further scenario, the device could be operated in a single-chip mode obtaining data in a time domain and outputting data as transversal FFT data or in a frequency domain. It is noted that the data can be obtained via the cascade input port or via the block 101 of the device and the data can be output via the cascade output port of the device.


A final output from the device operated in the master mode or the single-chip mode may be a potential target list. The target is, in one embodiment, an object that is identified by the radar system. Such target list can be further processed, e.g., by an evaluation unit of the car, which may influence the ride via acceleration, braking, active steering, etc.


Hence, the solution presented allows an efficient utilization of the computing performance provided by the slave device. In addition, master and slave device may have the same architecture.


In addition, a scalable radar architecture can be realized by using the same type of device several times in a cascaded way, e.g., as slave and master modes. By this approach, the benefits of the computing performance and the memory of the slave device are used so that the cascaded devices have a global performance and memory that is higher than the performance and memory of the master device alone.


Advantageously, the solution thus allows for the device to be used in multiple configurations in radar applications with the benefit that

    • there is a reduced need for designing different devices;
    • the devices have a higher overall performance when operated in cascaded mode (e.g., as master and slave devices);
    • a single device can be operated in three different modes, i.e. master, slave or single-chip.


Although various example embodiments of the disclosure have been disclosed, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. It will be obvious to those reasonably skilled in the art that other components performing the same functions may be suitably substituted. It should be mentioned that features explained with reference to a specific figure may be combined with features of other figures, even in those cases in which this has not explicitly been mentioned. Further, the methods of the disclosure may be achieved in either all software implementations, using the appropriate processor instructions, or in hybrid implementations that utilize a combination of hardware logic and software logic to achieve the same results. Such modifications to the inventive concept are intended to be covered by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A device for radar applications, comprising: a computing processor;a radar acquisition hardware logic connected to the computing processor;a timer hardware logic connected to the computing processor;a cascade input port; anda cascade output port,wherein the cascade input port is configured to convey an input signal to the computing processor, andwherein the cascade output port is configured to convey an output signal from the computing processor,wherein the device is configurable as a master device or as a slave device.
  • 2. The device according to claim 1, further comprising a communication hardware logic connected to the computing processor.
  • 3. The device according to claim 2, wherein the communication hardware logic is configured to supply management data or configuration data to the computing processor.
  • 4. The device according to claim 1, wherein the device is configurable as the master device by configuring the computing processor to a master mode and the device is configurable as the slave device by configuring the computing processor to a slave mode.
  • 5. The device according to claim 4, wherein the device is configured in the slave mode to obtain data in a time domain and output data in a frequency domain.
  • 6. The device according to claim 5, wherein the device conducts an FFT processing and provides FFT results that are processed at a subsequent device of the multi-stage processing.
  • 7. The device according to of claim 4, wherein the device is configured in the master mode to obtain data in a time domain or frequency domain and output data as FFT data or in in a frequency domain.
  • 8. The device according to claim 1, wherein the device is a single stage of a multi-stage processing.
  • 9. The device according to claim 1, wherein the device is bootable via a network, in particular a network operated via the Internet protocol.
  • 10. The device according to claim 1, wherein the output signal comprises a potential target list.
  • 11. The device according to claim 1, wherein a timer hardware logic is configurable to be synchronized to a timer hardware logic of an external device.
  • 12. The device according to claim 1, wherein a radio frequency signal from a radar radio frequency hardware logic is fed to the radar acquisition hardware logic.
  • 13. The device according to claim 1, wherein the radar acquisition hardware logic comprises a radar radio frequency unit configured to receive a radar signal and provide a signal related thereto to the computing processor.
  • 14. The device according to claim 1, wherein the radar acquisition hardware logic comprises a radio frequency signal processing means.
  • 15. The device according to claim 1, wherein the radar acquisition hardware logic comprises an analog-to-digital converter.
  • 16. The device according to claim 1, wherein FFT results are determined by the computing processor based on data from the radar acquisition hardware logic, and are forwarded via the cascade output port.
  • 17. The device according to claim 1, wherein the cascade output port is configured to convey tracing or monitoring information.
  • 18. The device according to claim 1, wherein the cascade output port is connected to a CAN bus interface.
  • 19. The device according to claim 1, wherein the device is configured, in a single-chip mode, to obtain data in a time domain and output data as FFT data or in a frequency domain.
  • 20. The device according to claim 1, wherein the device is a radar device that is in particular a single stage of a radar processing system.
  • 21. A vehicle comprising at least one device for radar applications, said device comprising: a computing processor;a radar acquisition hardware logic connected to the computing processor;a timer hardware logic connected to the computing processor;a cascade input port; anda cascade output port,wherein the cascade input port is configured to convey an input signal to the computing processor, andwherein the cascade output port is configured to convey an output signal from the computing processor,wherein the device is configurable as a master device or as a slave device.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/770,260 filed on Feb. 19, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,279,883, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (45)
Number Name Date Kind
3588460 Smith Jun 1971 A
3702393 Fuss Nov 1972 A
3714650 Fuller et al. Jan 1973 A
3746848 Clary Jul 1973 A
3892958 Fuss Jul 1975 A
4996661 Cox et al. Feb 1991 A
5218561 Iwadare Jun 1993 A
5483475 Kao Jan 1996 A
5613039 Wang et al. Mar 1997 A
5638281 Wang Jun 1997 A
5687196 Proctor, Jr. et al. Nov 1997 A
5781144 Hwa Jul 1998 A
5793323 Tsui Aug 1998 A
6003056 Auslander et al. Dec 1999 A
6208946 Arakawa et al. Mar 2001 B1
6313781 Lee Nov 2001 B1
6614389 Suzuki et al. Sep 2003 B2
6650274 Krikorian et al. Nov 2003 B1
6674393 Kishida Jan 2004 B2
6674397 Hager et al. Jan 2004 B2
6700526 Witten Mar 2004 B2
6734820 Hager et al. May 2004 B2
6753805 Nakanishi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6909397 Greneker, III et al. Jun 2005 B1
6950056 Hager et al. Sep 2005 B2
6977611 Crabb Dec 2005 B1
7071868 Woodington et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082172 Pringle et al. Jul 2006 B1
7095361 Mattes et al. Aug 2006 B2
7151484 Shinonaga et al. Dec 2006 B2
7312742 Steinway et al. Dec 2007 B2
7327303 Halsey et al. Feb 2008 B1
7352320 Enomoto et al. Apr 2008 B2
7403153 Kelly, Jr. et al. Jul 2008 B2
7423578 Tietjen Sep 2008 B1
7466261 Hoctor et al. Dec 2008 B1
7492303 Levitan et al. Feb 2009 B1
7515092 Zumsteg Apr 2009 B2
7518545 Minichshofer Apr 2009 B2
RE40854 Iwadare Jul 2009 E
7737879 Tietjen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7849123 Lai et al. Dec 2010 B2
8239442 Lerner Aug 2012 B2
9279883 Ygnace et al. Mar 2016 B2
20030210176 Hager et al. Nov 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0194975 Dec 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 6, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,260.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,260.
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,260.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160170010 A1 Jun 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13770260 Feb 2013 US
Child 15052099 US