The present disclosure generally relates to a method for receiving optical signals and a device using the same.
As the optical communication industry journeys toward a more advanced version of the next generation passive optical network standard (e.g. NGPON2) which requires a 40 gigabits per second transmission rate over 100 kilometers (km) of signal transmission over fiber, the performance of conventional optical transmission systems such as ones which utilize an Intensity-Modulation Direct Detection (IMDD) technique may fall short of the required standard even though an IMDD based device could be inexpensive and simple to design. Also since the conventional On-OFF keying (OOK) modulation technique is bandwidth inefficient, the Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) modulation technique which is more bandwidth efficient in comparison to the OOK modulation technique may become an enhancement.
The conventional IMDD based system may be restricted by radio frequency (RF) power fading. More specifically, when a signal, for example, an electromagnetic (EM) signal, is amplitude or intensity modulated, normally a double sideband is formed in the frequency domain. As the modulated EM signal traverses through the fiber, the modulated EM signal experiences from the fiber a dispersive effect which causes each side of the double sideband to phase rotate in the opposite direction. After the EM signal is received by an optical receiver, the RF power fading occurs in the received EM signal due to the effect of the destructive/non-constructive interference of the phase rotation of each of the double sidebands. As the EM signal propagates down the fiber, the worsening effect of the RF power fading becomes more and more apparent. Therefore, a solution which involves an optical single sideband modulation technique has been proposed.
Supposedly, if an EM signal only contains a single sideband, the problem of RF fading would not ensue. However, the means to achieve the single sideband modulation may require the Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) which could be twenty times more expensive than the direct modulation laser (DML). Also, the modulation method of the MZM modulator is amplitude modulation. After a modulated EM wave is received by an optical receiver, signal to signal beat interference (SSBI) with the same bandwidth as the single side band signal may occur in the lower frequency spectrum of the EM signal. Therefore, in order to accommodate this type of system, a guard band is usually needed which would then result in twice the transmission bandwidth. Based on this reason, an improvement based on the conventional IMDD technique to realize the required high speed transmission for the next generation passive optical network (NGPON) may still be feasible.
Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to a method of receiving optical signals for use in an optical communication device, and the method includes the steps of receiving from an optical receiver an input signal comprising a signal component and an interference component, wherein the interference component is subcarrier to subcarrier intermixing interference (SSII), converting the input signal into a frequency domain input signal, estimating the interference component according to at least a dynamic chirp component and a static chirp component, and cancelling the interference component from the frequency domain input signal to obtain a second signal.
Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to an optical communication device which includes the elements of a receiver and a processor unit which is coupled to the receiver, wherein the receiver receives an input signal comprising a signal component and an interference component, and the processing unit is configured to perform the function of converting the input signal into a frequency domain input signal, estimating the interference component, wherein the interference component is characterized by at least a dynamic chirp component and a static chirp component, and cancelling the interference component from the frequency domain input signal to obtain a second signal.
In order to make the aforementioned features of the disclosure comprehensible, embodiments accompanied with figures are described in detail below. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary, and are intended to provide further explanation of the disclosure as claimed.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
As the result of the RF fading phenomenon, the useful spectrum of a IMDD based optical communication system could be limited according to the frequency and distance of the signal transmission. However, by using the OFDM modulation technique the useful bandwidth could be extended by transmitting information in an upper frequency band. Even though it has been discovered that the upper frequency band could suffer a deduction of the signal to noise ratio due to the subcarrier to subcarrier intermixing interference (SSII), the SSII can nevertheless be calculated and then subsequently cancelled from the received signal according to the proposal of the present disclosure. Please note that the SSII is not related to SSBI as they transpire due to the result of two very different mechanisms. The SSII can be calculated according to a signal after fiber mathematical model by taking into account a static chirp value of the modulator, a dynamic chirp value as a function of the signal strength, the OFDM input signal, and the phase rotation due to signal dispersion. The dynamic chirp value can be adjusted or fine tuned based on an initial SSII estimation in comparison with a correlation estimation with an actual measured error power of signal and thus further improves the accuracy of the estimated SSII signal. Based on the proposal of the present disclosure and actual experimental data, the proposed system is then able to increase the useful bandwidth of an IMDD communication system on the order of several gigahertz (GHz) over 100 km of fiber.
However, transmitting signals over an upper frequency band is not without challenges in addition to the RF power fading.
In order to calculate the SSII, first a theoretical/mathematical model of the SSII could be established. To obtain an accurate estimate of the SSII, the modulator chirp is to be considered. For each IMDD based modulator, there is a chirp factor which affects the speed of the RF fading as well as how SSII is generated. Also the modulator chirp varies according to the signal strength of the modulated signal. Therefore, the dynamic property of the modulator chirp may also be considered.
The signal in the time domain after electrical to optical conversion can be mathematically presented as equation (1) as follows:
and n is the number of OFDM carriers, in is amplitude of nth subcarrier, and j is imaginary unit.
The third and higher order terms of x in equation 1 are discarded, and α0 and α1 are due to the chirp of optical modulator. The α0 value could be considered as a static chirp parameter, such α0 is inherent for every modulator and is fixed so that it can be known for each modulator after it is produced from a factory. The α1 value could be considered as a dynamic chirp parameter, as it is dependent upon the amplitude of an input signal to a modulator.
Next, the signal traveling through a fiber can be characterized according to equation 2 as follows:
Wherein θD is the signal phase rotation due to the dispersion of the fiber. Since a fiber could impart a signal dispersion, the signal after the fiber transmission would induce different phase shifts at different subcarriers.
After the signal is received by a photo detector, the received signal is direct detected by a square law photo detector can be characterized by equation 3 as follows:
Equation 3 can be re-expressed as the sum of a DC term, a signal term, and a SSII term
After fiber transmission, the signal term and the SSII term which is due to the intermixing of the OFDM subcarriers can be used to construct a theoretical model.
The optical communication device (300) receives a signal which may include a received signal including an aforementioned SSII component (310) and outputs a detected data (360) which is substantially free of the signal contamination of the SSII component. First the received signal with the SSII (310) is direct detected by an photo detector (320) and is converted into an analog electrical signal. The analog electrical signal is then converted into a digital signal by the ADC, and the resulting digital signal is fed into the processing unit (340). The processing unit (340) may include one or more micro processors or a DSP chip and/or at least one controller, and the main purpose of the processing unit (340) is to implement the aforementioned SSII model. The processing unit (340) may also optionally interface with a memory unit (350) which may act as a memory buffer to temporarily store the calculation results of the processing unit (340).
The processing unit first performs Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on the input signal (410) by the FFT module. For the first iteration, the input signal (410) is sent to the equalizer (430). The equalizer (430) is configured to perform a frequency domain equalization of the received data symbols from the optical channel response. The equalizer (430) may equalize the channel response by reversing the received data symbols with a trained channel response. The channel response could be obtained from performing a channel estimation using a reference or pilot signal. The equalized data symbol is then sent to the decision unit (440) and to the SSII calculation unit (450) to be processed. The decision unit performs decision on the equalized symbol data and output the result as detected data (460) but at the same time send the output to the SSII calculation unit (450) in the feedback loop. The SSII calculation unit (450) based on the data from equalization (430) and the decision unit (440) calculates the estimated SSII component originally present in the input signal (410). For subsequent iterations, the subtraction unit (425) subtract the SSII component from the frequency domain input signal so as to output a detected data (460) virtually free of the SSII signal.
In S512, the Tx signal reconstruction module (510) receives decision data from the decision unit (440). In S514, the Tx signal reconstruction module (510) receives the equalizer data from the equalizer (430) so as to perform the transmission response estimation. In S516, the decision data gets multiplied by the Tx response estimation and the resulting signal data and resulting signal is the reconstructed signal of the outputted from the transmitter before the signal traverses through a fiber and is sent to the theoretical SSII calculation module (520).
In S522, the theoretical SSII is constructed according to equation 3 according to the constructed signal from the operation of S516, and from the input of a dynamic chirp estimation which is α1 in S526. In order to increase the accuracy of the theoretical SSII calculation, an accurate estimation of the dynamic chirp value, α1, could be iteratively searched. When the selection of the dynamic chirp value, α1, leads to a theoretically calculated SSII which correlates strongly with the measured error power, it can be known that the SSII number is accurate. Thus, the output of the theoretical SSII calculation from S522 is feedback to S524 which calculates a correlation between the theoretical SSII and the actual measured error power.
In S528, the actual measure error power receives signal from the equalizer (430) and from the decision unit (440) where the equalizer (430) outputs the signal containing error components and the decision unit (440) does not contain error components. The difference between the signals obtained from the equalizer (430) and the decision unit (440) would constitute the measured error power in S528. The correlation value (R) between the calculated SSII and the measure error power would then be used in S526 for the dynamic chirp estimation, α1. The α1 is then used to calculate the theoretical SSII to complete the feedback loop.
In S532, the RX SSII reconstruction module (530) receives signal from the theoretical SSII calculation from the step S522 and performs the amplitude and phase adjustments in order to obtain the SSII value in S534 in order to be forwarded to the subtracting unit (425). The calculated SSII value in S534 is fed to subtracting unit (425) which performs subtraction of the SSII component from the frequency domain input signal after the FFT (420). It should be noted that the purpose of the subtractor (425) is to perform cancellation for the SSII so that in another embodiment, the subtractor may be replaced by an adder which adds a negative interference signal. Also the subtractor 425 may perform SSII cancellation iteratively which could produce more and more accurate data after each iteration.
For the second interation for instance, in S512, the Tx signal reconstruction module (510) once again receives decision data and equalizer data and output the resulting signal from step S516 to the theoretical SSII calculation module 520 in order that the theoretical SSII is once again constructed according to equation 3 based on the input signal from the operation of S516 and also based on the input of a dynamic chirp estimation. The dynamic chirp value, α1, would once again be iteratively searched and resulting in a theoretically calculated SSII which correlates strongly with the measured error power. The RX SSII reconstruction module (530) then receives signal from the theoretical SSII calculation and once again performs the amplitude and phase adjustments in order to obtain the SSII value which is forwarded to the subtracting unit (425). The process could then repeats for subsequent interations.
In S630, a correlation (R) estimation is performed between the estimated SSII value from S620 and the error power from S680. In S630, the correlation R is calculated according to equation 4 as follows:
Wherein, X is the signal power from S620, {tilde over (X)} is the average of X, Y is the measure error power from S680, and {tilde over (Y)} is the average of Y.
After the correlation value R is calculated in S630, R is compared with a predetermined threshold value, Rth. If R is greater than Rth, then it is determined that there is sufficient correlation between the measured error power in S680 and the estimated SSII in S620 for the selected α1. Otherwise if the correlation value R is not greater than threshold value Rth, then the process moves to S650. In S650, the ΔR value is compared with the ΔRth value. The ΔR is the change of the correlation value R from the R value of a previous iteration. In other words, ΔR is the difference between the current iteration of R value estimated in S630 and the R value of a previous iteration. ΔRth is a predetermined threshold set for ΔR. Therefore, in S650 if ΔR is less than the ΔRth then the process moves to S660 in which the theoretical SSII output is determined based on the current selection of α1. Otherwise, if the ΔR is not less than ΔRth, then α1 is re-adjusted so as to perform another iteration of R calculation based on the selected α1 value. For the subsequent iterations, for example, steps S620-S680 would be performed repeated with at least one or more different α1 values until the steps in S640 or S650 result in a yes. In that case, the selected α1 value would be used for the theoretical SSII output in step S660.
Please note that each blocks of
The signal bandwidth of a conventional IMDD based system is not only limited by RF fading but also adversely affected by the SSII in the higher frequency spectrum. In view of the aforementioned descriptions, the present disclosure is able to improve transmission bandwidth of orthogonal frequency division multiplexed (OFDM) signals by first calculating the theoretical SSII in the received signals and then subtracting the theoretical SSII from the received signals. The SSII can be calculated according to a signal after fiber mathematical model by taking into account a static chirp value and a dynamic chirp value of the modulator. The dynamic chirp value can be fine tuned based on an initial SSII estimation in comparison with a correlation estimation with an actual measure power signal and thus further improves the accuracy of the estimated SSII signal. Based on the theoretical model verified by experimental results, the overall SNR of the system has been improved. After SSII is cancelled from the received signals, the useful bandwidth of transmitting signals over 100 km of fiber may increase by another two GHz.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the disclosed embodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the priority benefits of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/718,713, filed on Oct. 26, 2012, and U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/719,500, filed on Oct. 29, 2012. The entirety of each of the above-mentioned patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5866896 | Georgiades et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
7796898 | Armstrong | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8233799 | Lowery | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8737458 | Eliaz et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20070070932 | Doron et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090067833 | Bunge et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20110249978 | Sasaki | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120327757 | Wang et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200950390 | Dec 2009 | TW |
201134150 | Oct 2011 | TW |
201220730 | May 2012 | TW |
Entry |
---|
Schuster et al, “Spectrally Efficient Compatible Single-Sideband Modulation for OFDM Transmission With Direct Detection,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 20(9), May 1, 2008, pp. 670-672. |
Chia-Chien Wei, “Small-signal analysis of OOFDM signal transmission with directly modulated laser and direct detection,” Optics Letters 36(2), Jan. 15, 2011, pp. 151-153. |
Mehedy et al., “Frequency Interleaving Towards Spectrally Efficient Direct Detection Based Optical OFDM Systems,” 15th OptoElectronics and Communications Conference (OECC2010) Technical Digest, Jul. 2010, pp. 476-477. |
Peng et al., “Spectrally Efficient Direct-Detected OFDM Transmission Incorporating a Tunable Frequency Gap and an Iterative Detection Techniques,” Journal of Lightwave Technology 27(24), Dec. 15, 2009, pp. 5723-5735. |
Cao et al, “Direct-Detection Optical OFDM Transmission System Without Frequency Guard Band,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 22(11), Jun. 1, 2010, pp. 736-738. |
Peng et al., “Enabling High Capacity Direct-Detection Optical OFDM Transmissions Using Beat Interference Cancellation Receiver,” 2010 36th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC), Sep. 19-23, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
Chia-Chien Wei, “Analysis and iterative equalization of transient and adiabatic chirp effects in DML-based OFDM transmission systems,” Optics Express 20(23), Nov. 2012, pp. 25774-25789. |
“Notice of Allowance of Taiwan Counterpart Application”, issued on Nov. 17, 2014, p. 1-p. 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140119726 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61718713 | Oct 2012 | US | |
61719500 | Oct 2012 | US |