Patent Application
20060198765
This invention relates to methods and devices for sample preparation, such as separating (i.e., extracting or purifying) an analyte from a sample solution. The analytes can include biomolecules, particularly biological macromolecules such as proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, polysaccharides and lipids.
Solid phase extraction is a powerful technology for purifying and concentrating analytes, including biomolecules. For example, it is one of the primary tools used for preparing protein samples prior to analysis by any of a variety of analytical techniques, including mass spectrometry, surface plasmon resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance, x-ray crystallography, and the like. With these techniques, typically only a small volume of sample is required. However, it is often critical that interfering contaminants be removed from the sample and that the analyte of interest is present at some minimum concentration. Thus, sample preparation methods are needed the permit the purification and concentration of small volume samples with minimal sample loss.
The subject invention involves methods and devices for purifying or extracting an analyte from a sample solution using a packed bed of extraction medium, e.g., a bed of gel-type beads derivatized with a group having an affinity for an analyte of interest. These methods, and the related devices and reagents, will be of particular interest to the life scientist, since they provide a powerful technology for purifying, concentrating and analyzing biomolecules and other analytes of interest. However, the methods, devices and reagents are not limited to use in the biological sciences, and can find wide application in a variety of preparative and analytical contexts.
This invention relates to methods and devices for extracting an analyte from a sample solution. The analytes can include biomolecules, particularly biological macromolecules such as proteins and peptides, polynucleotides, lipids and polysaccharides. The device and method of this invention are particularly useful in proteomics for sample preparation and analysis with analytical technologies employing biochips, mass spectrometry and other instrumentation. The extraction process generally results in the enrichment, concentration, and/or purification of an analyte or analytes of interest.
In U.S. Patent Application Publication Numbers US2004/0072375 and USS2005/0019951, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,707, incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, methods and devices for performing low dead column extractions are described. The instant specification, inter alia, expands upon the concepts described in that application.
Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to specific embodiments described herein. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein for the purpose of describing particular embodiments is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, specific examples of appropriate materials and methods are described herein.
Definitions
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.
The term “bed volume” as used herein is defined as the volume of a bed of extraction medium in an extraction column. Depending on how densely the bed is packed, the volume of the extraction medium in the column bed is typically about one third to two thirds of the total bed volume; well packed beds have less space between the beads and hence generally have lower interstital volumes.
The term “interstitial volume” of the bed refers to the volume of the bed of extraction medium that is accessible to solvent, e.g., aqueous sample solutions, wash solutions and desorption solvents. For example, in the case where the extraction medium is a chromatography bead (e.g., agarose or sepharose), the interstitial volume of the bed constitutes the solvent accessible volume between the beads, as well as any solvent accessible internal regions of the bead, e.g., solvent accessible pores. The interstitial volume of the bed represents the minimum volume of liquid required to saturate the column bed.
The term “dead volume” as used herein with respect to a column is defined as the interstitial volume of the extraction bed, tubes, membrane or frits, and passageways in a column. Some embodiments of the invention involve the use of low dead volume columns.
The term “elution volume” as used herein is defined as the volume of desorption or elution liquid into which the analytes are desorbed and collected. The terms “desorption solvent,” “elution liquid” and the like are used interchangeably herein.
The term “enrichment factor” as used herein is defined as the ratio of the sample volume divided by the elution volume, assuming that there is no contribution of liquid coming from the dead volume. To the extent that the dead volume either dilutes the analytes or prevents complete adsorption, the enrichment factor is reduced.
The terms “extraction column” and “extraction tip” as used herein are defined as a column device used in combination with a pump, the column device containing a bed of solid phase extraction material, i.e., extraction medium.
The term “frit” as used herein is defined as porous material for holding the extraction medium in place in a column. An extraction media chamber is typically defined by a top and bottom frit positioned in an extraction column. In certain embodiments of the invention the frit is a thin, low pore volume filter, e.g., a membrane screen.
The term “lower column body” as used herein is defined as the column bed and bottom membrane screen of a column.
The term “membrane screen” as used herein is defined as a woven or non-woven fabric or screen for holding the column packing in place in the column bed, the membranes having a low dead volume. The membranes are of sufficient strength to withstand packing and use of the column bed and of sufficient porosity to allow passage of liquids through the column bed. The membrane is thin enough so that it can be sealed around the perimeter or circumference of the membrane screen so that the liquids flow through the screen.
The term “sample volume”, as used herein is defined as the volume of the liquid of the original sample solution from which the analytes are separated or purified.
The term “upper column body”, as used herein is defined as the chamber and top membrane screen of a column.
The term “biomolecule” as used herein refers to biomolecule derived from a biological system. The term includes biological macromolecules, such as a proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids.
I. Extraction Columns
In accordance with the present invention there may be employed conventional chemistry, biological and analytical techniques within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g. Chromatography, 5th edition, PART A: FUNDAMENTALS AND TECHNIQUES, editor: E. Heftmann, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York (1992); ADVANCED CHROMATOGRAPHIC AND ELECTROMIGRATION METHODS IN BIOSCIENCES, editor: Z. Deyl, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (1998); CHROMATOGRAPHY TODAY, Colin F. Poole and Salwa K. Poole, and Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, (1991).
In some embodiments of the subject invention the packed bed of extraction medium is contained in a column, e.g., a low dead volume column. Non-limiting examples of suitable columns, particularly low dead volume columns, are presented herein. It is to be understood that the subject invention is not to be construed as limited to the use of extraction beds in low dead volume columns, or in columns in general. For example, the invention is equally applicable to use with a packed bed of extraction medium as a component of a multi-well plate.
Column Body
The column body is a tube having two open ends connected by an open channel, sometimes referred to as a through passageway. The tube can be in any shape, including but not limited to cylindrical or frustoconical, and of any dimensions consistent with the function of the column as described herein. In some embodiments of the invention the column body takes the form of a pipette tip, a syringe, a luer adapter or similar tubular bodies. In embodiments where the column body is a pipette tip, the end of the tip wherein the bed of extraction medium is placed can take any of a number of geometries, e.g., it can be tapered or cylindrical. In some case a cylindrical channel of relatively constant radius can be preferable to a tapered tip, for a variety of reason, e.g., solution flows through the bed at a uniform rate, rather than varying as a function of a variable channel diameter.
In some embodiments, one of the open ends of the column, sometimes referred to herein as the open upper end of the column, is adapted for attachment to a pump, either directly or indirectly. In some embodiments of the invention the upper open end is operatively attached to a pump, whereby the pump can be used for aspirating (i.e., drawing) a fluid into the extraction column through the open lower end of the column, and optionally for discharging (i.e., expelling) fluid out through the open lower end of the column. Thus, it is a feature certain embodiments of the present invention that fluid enters and exits the extraction column through the same open end of the column, typically the open lower end. This is in contradistinction with the operation of some extraction columns, where fluid enters the column through one open end and exits through the other end after traveling through an extraction medium, i.e., similar to conventional column chromatography. The fluid can be a liquid, such as a sample solution, wash solution or desorption solvent. The fluid can also be a gas, e.g., air used to blow liquid out of the extraction column.
In other embodiments of the present invention, fluid enters the column through one end and exits through the other. In some embodiments, the invention provides extraction methods that involve a hybrid approach; that is, one or more fluids enter the column through one end and exit through the other, and one more fluids enter and exit the column through the same open end of the column, e.g., the lower end. Thus, for example, in some methods the sample solution and/or wash solution are introduced through the top of the column and exit through the bottom end, while the desorption solution enters and exits through the bottom opening of the column. Aspiration and discharge of solution through the same end of the column can be particularly advantageous in procedures designed to minimize sample loss, particularly when small volumes of liquid are used. A good example would be a procedure that employs a very small volume of desorption solvent, e.g., a procedure involving a high enrichment factor.
The column body can be can be composed of any material that is sufficiently non-porous that it can retain fluid and that is compatible with the solutions, media, pumps and analytes used. A material should be employed that does not substantially react with substances it will contact during use of the extraction column, e.g., the sample solutions, the analyte of interest, the extraction medium and desorption solvent. A wide range of suitable materials are available and known to one of skill in the art, and the choice is one of design. Various plastics make ideal column body materials, but other materials such as glass, ceramics or metals could be used in some embodiments of the invention. Some examples of preferred materials include polysulfone, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethersulfone, polytetrafluoroethylene, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, acrylonitrile PVC copolymer, polystyrene, polystyrene/acrylonitrile copolymer, polyvinylidene fluoride, glass, metal, silica, and combinations of the above listed materials.
Extraction Media
The extraction medium used in the column is preferably a form of water-insoluble particle (e.g., a porous or non-porous bead) that has an affinity for an analyte of interest. Typically the analyte of interest is a protein, peptide or nucleic acid. The extraction processes can be affinity, size exclusion, reverse phase, normal phase, ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, or hydrophilic interaction chromatography agents. In general, the term “extraction medium” is used in a broad sense to encompass any media capable of effecting separation, either partial or complete, of an analyte from another. Thus, the terms “separation column” and “extraction column” can be used interchangeably. Likewise, the terms “extraction medium” and “separation medium” can also be used interchangeably. The term “analyte” can refer to any compound of interest, e.g., to be analyzed or simply removed from a solution.
The bed volume of the extraction medium used in the extraction columns of the invention is typically small, typically in the range of 0.1-1000 μL, preferably in the range of 0.1-100 μL, e.g., in a range having a lower limit of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 5 or 10 μL; and an upper limit of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400 or 500 μL. The low bed volume contributes to a low interstitial volume of the bed, reducing the dead volume of the column, thereby facilitating the recovery of analyte in a small volume of desorption solvent.
The low bed volumes employed in certain embodiments allow for the use of relatively small amounts of extraction medium, e.g., soft, gel-type beads. For example, some embodiments of the invention employ a bed of extraction medium having a dry weight of less than 1 gram (e.g., in the range of 0.001-1 g, 0.005-1 g, 0.01-1 g or 0.02-1 g), less than 100 mg (e.g., in the range of 0.1-100 mg, 0.5-100 mg, 1-100 mg 2-100 mg, or 10-100 mg), less than 10 mg (e.g., in the range of 0.1-10 mg, 0.5-10 mg, 1-10 mg or 2-10 mg), less than 2 mg (e.g., in the range of 0.1-2 mg, 0.5-2 mg or 1-2 mg), or less than 1 mg (e.g., in the range of 0.1-1 mg or 0.5-1 mg).
Many of the extraction media types suitable for use in the invention are selected from a variety of classes of chromatography media. It has been found that many of these chromatography media and the associated chemistries are suited for use as solid phase extraction media in the devices and methods of this invention.
Thus, examples of suitable extraction media include resin beads used for extraction and/or chromatography. Preferred resins include gel resins, pellicular resins, and macroporous resins.
The term “gel resin” refers to a resin comprising low-crosslinked bead materials that can swell in a solvent, e.g., upon hydration. Crosslinking refers to the physical linking of the polymer chains that form the beads. The physical linking is normally accomplished through a crosslinking monomer that contains bi-polymerizing functionality so that during the polymerization process, the molecule can be incorporated into two different polymer chains. The degree of crosslinking for a particular material can range from 0.1 to 30%, with 0.5 to 10% normally used. 1 to 5% crosslinking is most common. A lower degree of crosslinking renders the bead more permeable to solvent, thus making the functional sites within the bead more accessible to analyte. However, a low crosslinked bead can be deformed easily, and should only be used if the flow of eluent through the bed is slow enough or gentle enough to prevent closing the interstitial spaces between the beads, which could then lead to catastrophic collapse of the bed. Higher crosslinked materials swell less and may prevent access of the analytes and desorption materials to the interior functional groups within the bead. Generally, it is desirable to use as low a level of crosslinking as possible, so long is it is sufficient to withstand collapse of the bed. This means that in conventional gel-packed columns, slow flow rates may have to be used. In the present invention the back pressure is very low, and high liquid flow rates can be used without collapsing the bed. Surprisingly, using these high solvent velocities does not appear to reduce the capacity or usefulness of the bead materials. Common gel resins include agarose, sepharose, polystyrene, polyacrylate, cellulose and other substrates. Gel resins can be non-porous or micro-porous beads.
The low back pressure associated with certain columns of the invention results in some cases in the columns exhibiting characteristics not normally associated with conventional packed columns. For example, in some cases it has been observed that below a certain threshold pressure solvent does not flow through the column. This threshold pressure can be thought of as a “bubble point.” In conventional columns, the flow rate through the column generally increases from zero as a smooth function of the pressure at which the solvent is being pushed through the column. With many of the columns of the invention, a progressively increasing pressure will not result in any flow through the column until the threshold pressure is achieved. Once the threshold pressure is reached, the flow will start at a rate significantly greater than zero, i.e., there is no smooth increase in flow rate with pressure, but instead a sudden jump from zero to a relatively fast flow rate. Once the threshold pressure has been exceeded flow commences, the flow rate typically increases relatively smoothly with increasing pressure, as would be the case with conventional columns.
The term “pellicular resins” refers to materials in which the functional groups are on the surface of the bead or in a thin layer on the surface of the bead. The interior of the bead is solid, usually highly crosslinked, and usually inaccessible to the solvent and analytes. Pellicular resins generally have lower capacities than gel and macroporous resins.
The term “macroporous resin” refers to highly crosslinked resins having high surface area due to a physical porous structure that formed during the polymerization process. Generally an inert material (such as a solid or a liquid that does not solvate the polymer that is formed) is polymerized with the bead and then later washed out, leaving a porous structure. Crosslinking of macroporous materials range from 5% to 90% with perhaps a 25 to 55% crosslinking the most common materials. Macroporous resins behave similar to pellicular resins except that in effect much more surface area is available for interaction of analyte with resin functional groups.
Examples of resins beads include polystyrene/divinylbenzene copolymers, poly methylmethacrylate, protein G beads (e.g., for IgG protein purification), MEP Hypercel™ beads (e.g., for IgG protein purification), affinity phase beads (e.g., for protein purification), ion exchange phase beads (e.g., for protein purification), hydrophobic interaction beads (e.g., for protein purification), reverse phase beads (e.g., for nucleic acid or protein purification), and beads having an affinity for molecules analyzed by label-free detection. Silica beads are also suitable.
Soft gel resin beads, such as agarose and sepharose based beads, are found to work surprisingly well in columns and methods of this invention. In conventional chromatography fast flow rates can result in bead compression, which results in increased back pressure and adversely impacts the ability to use these gels with faster flow rates. In the present invention relatively small bed volumes are used, and it appears that this allows for the use of high flow rates with a minimal amount of bead compression and the problem attendant with such compression.
The average particle diameters of beads of the invention are typically in the range of about 1 μm to several millimeters, e.g., diameters in ranges having lower limits of 1 μm, 5 μm, 10 μm, 20 μm, 30 μm, 40 μm, 50 μm, 60>m, 70 μm, 80 μm, 90 μm, 100 μm, 150 μm, 200 μm, 300 μm, or 500 μm, and upper limits of 10 μm, 20 μm, 30 μm, 40 μm, 50 μm, 60 μm, 70 μm, 80 μm, 90 μm, 100 μm, 150 μm, 200 μm, 300 μm, 500 μm, 750 μm, 1 mm, 2 mm, or 3 mm.
The bead size that may be used depends somewhat on the bed volume and the cross sectional area of the column. A lower bed volume column will tolerate a smaller bead size without generating the high backpressures that could burst a thin membrane frit. For example a bed volume of 0.1 to 1 μL bed, can tolerate 5 to 10 μm particles. Larger beds (up to about 50 μL) normally have beads sizes of 30-150 μm or higher. The upper range of particle size is dependant on the diameter of the column bed. The bead diameter size should not be more than 50% of the bed diameter, and preferably less than 10% of the bed diameter.
The extraction chemistry employed in the present invention can take any of a wide variety of forms. For example, the extraction medium can be selected from, or based on, any of the extraction chemistries used in solid-phase extraction and/or chromatography, e.g., reverse-phase, normal phase, hydrophobic interaction, hydrophilic interaction, ion-exchange, thiophilic separation, hydrophobic charge induction or affinity binding. Because the invention is particularly suited to the purification and/or concentration of biomolecules, extraction surfaces capable of adsorbing such molecules are particularly relevant. See, e.g., SEPARATION AND SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY Vol. 2.:HANDBOOK OF BIOSEPARATIONS, edited by Satinder Ahuja, Academic Press (2000).
Affinity extractions use a technique in which a biospecific adsorbent is prepared by coupling a specific ligand (such as an enzyme, antigen, or hormone) for the analyte, (e.g., macromolecule) of interest to a solid support. This immobilized ligand will interact selectively with molecules that can bind to it. Molecules that will not bind elute unretained. The interaction is selective and reversible. The references listed below show examples of the types of affinity groups that can be employed in the practice of this invention are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. Antibody Purification Handbook, Amersham Biosciences, Edition AB, 18-1037-46 (2002); Protein Purification Handbook, Amersham Biosciences, Edition AC, 18-1132-29 (2001); Affinity Chromatography Principles and Methods, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Edition AC, 18-1022-29 (2001); The Recombinant Protein Handbook, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Edition AB, 18-1142-75 (2002); and Protein Purification: Principles, High Resolution Methods, and Applications, Jan-Christen Janson (Editor), Lars G. Ryden (Editor), Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated (1989).
Antibodies can be extracted using, for example, proteins such as protein A, protein G, protein L, hybrids of these, or by other antibodies (e.g., an anti-IgE for purifying IgE).
Chelated metals are not only useful for purifying poly-his tagged proteins, but also other non-tagged proteins that have an intrinsic affinity for the chelated metal, e.g., phosphopeptides and phosphoproteins.
Antibodies can also be useful for purifying non-tagged proteins to which they have an affinity, e.g., by using antibodies with affinity for a specific phosphorylation site or phosphorylated amino acids.
In other embodiments of the invention extraction surfaces are employed that are generally less specific than the affinity binding agents discussed above. These extraction chemistries are still often quite useful. Examples include ion exchange, reversed phase, normal phase, hydrophobic interaction and hydrophilic interaction extraction or chromatography surfaces. In general, these extraction chemistries, methods of their use, appropriate solvents, etc. are well known in the art, and in particular are described in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/434,713 and 10/620,155, and references cited therein, e.g., Chromatography, 5th edition, PART A: FUNDAMENTALS AND TECHNIQUES, editor: E. Heftmann, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, pp A25 (1992); ADVANCED CHROMATOGRAPHIC AND ELECTROMIGRATION METHODS IN BIOSCIENCES, editor: Z. Deyl, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 528 (1998); CHROMATOGRAPHY TODAY, Colin F. Poole and Salwa K. Poole, and Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, pp 3 94 (1991); and ORGANIC SYNTHESIS ON SOLID PHASE, F. Dorwald Wiley VCH Verlag Gmbh, Weinheim 2002.
Frits
In some embodiments of the invention one or more frits is used to contain the bed of extraction in, for example, a column. Frits can take a variety of forms, and can be constructed from a variety of materials, e.g., glass, ceramic, metal, fiber. Some embodiments of the invention employ frits having a low pore volume, which contribute to reducing dead volume. The frits of the invention are porous, since it is necessary for fluid to be able to pass through the frit. The frit should have sufficient structural strength so that frit integrity can contain the extraction medium in the column. It is desirable that the frit have little or no affinity for chemicals with which it will come into contact during the extraction process, particularly the analyte of interest. In many embodiments of the invention the analyte of interest is a biomolecule, particularly a biological macromolecule. Thus in many embodiments of the invention it desirable to use a frit that has a minimal tendency to bind or otherwise interact with biological macromolecules, particularly proteins, peptides and nucleic acids.
Frits of various pores sizes and pore densities may be used provided the free flow of liquid is possible and the beads are held in place within the extraction medium bed.
In one embodiment, one frit (e.g., a lower, or bottom, frit) is bonded to and extends across the open channel of the column body. Preferably, the bottom frit is attached at or near the open lower end of the column, e.g., bonded to and extend across the open lower end. Normally, a bed of separation medium, such as an extraction medium, is positioned inside the open channel and in contact with the bottom frit. However, in some cases a column with a bottom frit and no bed of medium can be useful for certain techniques encompassed by this invention. For example, a pipette tip with a frit at the open lower end can be used to take up a liquid sample without taking up solid or particulate material in the sample. The solid or particulate material might be gel fragments, beads, etc. In this context, the bottom frit is essentially acting as a filter, and a membrane screen can serve as a particularly appropriate bottom frit.
In certain embodiments, an optional top frit may be employed. For example, in some embodiments a second frit is bonded to and extends across the open channel between the bottom frit and the open upper end of the column body. In this embodiment, the top frit, bottom frit and column body (i.e., the inner surface of the channel) define an extraction media chamber wherein a bed of extraction medium is positioned. The frits should be securely attached to the column body and extend across the opening and/or open end so as to completely occlude the channel, thereby substantially confining the bed of extraction medium inside the extraction media chamber. In certain embodiments of the invention the bed of extraction medium occupies at least 80% of the volume of the extraction media chamber, more preferably 90%, 95%, 99%, or substantially 100% of the volume. In some embodiments the invention the space between the extraction medium bed and the upper and lower frits is negligible, i.e., the frits are in substantial contact with upper and lower surfaces of the extraction medium bed, holding a well-packed bed of extraction medium securely in place.
In certain embodiments of the invention the bottom frit is located at the open lower end of the column body. This configuration is not required, i.e., in some embodiments the bottom frit is located at some distance up the column body from the open lower end. However, in view of the advantage that comes with minimizing dead volume in the column, it is desirable that the lower frit and extraction media chamber be located at or near the lower end. For the purposes of this invention, so long as the length as this extension is such that it does not substantially introduce dead volume into the extraction column or otherwise adversely impact the function of the column, the bottom frit is considered to be located at the lower end of the column body. In some embodiments of the invention the volume defined by the bottom frit, channel surface, and the face of the open lower end (i.e., the channel volume below the bottom frit) is less than the volume of the extraction media chamber, or less than 10% of the volume of the extraction media chamber, or less than 1% of the volume of the extraction media chamber.
In some embodiments of the invention, the extraction media chamber is positioned near one end of the column, which for purposes of explanation will be described as the bottom end of the column. The area of the column body channel above the extraction media chamber can be can be quite large in relation to the size of the extraction media chamber. For example, in some embodiments the volume of the extraction chamber is equal to less than 50%, less than 20, less than 10%, less than 5%, less than 2%, less than 1% or less than 0.5% of the total internal volume of the column body. In operation, solvent can flow through the open lower end of the column, through the bed of extraction medium and out of the extraction media chamber into the section of the channel above the chamber. For example, when the column body is a pipette tip, the open upper end can be fitted to a pipettor and a solution drawn through the extraction medium and into the upper part of the channel.
The frits used in the invention are preferably characterized by having a low pore volume. Some embodiments of the invention employ frits having pore volumes of less than 1 microliter (e.g., in the range of 0.015-1 microliter, 0.03-1 microliter, 0.1-1 microliter or 0.5-1 microliter), preferably less than 0.5 microliter (e.g., in the range of 0.015-0.5 microliter, 0.03-0.5 microliter or 0.1-0.5 microliter), less than 0.1 microliter (e.g., in the range of 0.015-0.1 microliter or 0.03-0.1 microliter) or less than 0.03 microliters (e.g., in the range of 0.015-0.03 microliter).
Frits of the invention preferably have pore openings or mesh openings of a size in the range of about 5-100 μm, more preferably 10-100 μm, and still more preferably 15-50 μm, e.g., about 43 μm. The performance of the column is typically enhanced by the use of frits having pore or mesh openings sufficiently large so as to minimize the resistance to flow. The use of membrane screens as described herein typically provide this low resistance to flow and hence better flow rates, reduced back pressure and minimal distortion of the bed of extraction medium. The pre or mesh openings of course should not be so large that they are unable to adequately contain the extraction medium in the chamber.
Some frits used in the practice of the invention are characterized by having a low pore volume relative to the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium contained by the frit. Thus, in certain embodiments of the invention the frit pore volume is equal to 10% or less of the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium (e.g., in the range 0.1-10%, 0.25-10%, 1-10% or 5-10% of the interstitial volume), more preferably 5% or less of the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium (e.g., in the range 0.1-5%, 0.25-5% or 1-5% of the interstitial volume), and still more preferably 1% or less of the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium (e.g., in the range 0.01-1%, 0.05-1% or 0.1-1% of the interstitial volume).
The pore density will allow flow of the liquid through the membrane and is preferably 10% and higher to increase the flow rate that is possible and to reduce the time needed to process the sample.
Some embodiments of the invention employ a thin frit, preferably less than 350 μm in thickness (e.g., in the range of 20-350 μm, 40-350>m, or 50-350 μm), more preferably less than 200 μm in thickness (e.g., in the range of 20-200 μm, 40-200 μm, or 50-200 μm), more preferably less than 100 μm in thickness (e.g., in the range of 20-100 μm, 40-100 μm, or 50-100 μm), and most preferably less than 75 μm in thickness (e.g., in the range of 20-75 μm, 40-75 μm, or 50-75 μm).
Certain embodiments of the invention involve the use of frits that are thin relative to the diameter of the separation medium employed. For example, certain embodiments employ gel resin beads having average diameters of 90 microns and membrane screen frits having a thickness of 60 microns and pore size of 37 microns (24% porous), i.e., the thickness of the frit is less than the average diameter of the separation beads. This can be characterized in terms of the ratio of average bead diameter to frit thickness, e.g., in this case, a ratio of 60/90, or 0.67. For example, in various embodiments of the invention, bead diameter to frit thickness ratios of less than 100, less than 50, less than 10, less than 5, less than 1, less than 0.5, less than 0.1, or even less can be employed. The low values can translate into improved performance, resulting, for example, in the low back pressures described elsewhere herein.
Some embodiments of the invention employ a membrane screen as the frit. The membrane screen should be strong enough to not only contain the extraction medium in the column bed, but also to avoid becoming detached or punctured during the actual packing of the medium into the column bed. Membranes can be fragile, and in some embodiments must be contained in a framework to maintain their integrity during use. However, it is desirable to use a membrane of sufficient strength such that it can be used without reliance on such a framework. The membrane screen should also be flexible so that it can conform to the column bed. This flexibility is advantageous in the packing process as it allows the membrane screen to conform to the bed of extraction medium, resulting in a reduction in dead volume.
The membrane can be a woven or non-woven mesh of fibers that may be a mesh weave, a random orientated mat of fibers i.e. a “polymer paper,” a spun bonded mesh, an etched or “pore drilled” paper or membrane such as nuclear track etched membrane or an electrolytic mesh (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,556,598). The membrane may be, e.g., polymer, glass, or metal provided the membrane is low dead volume, allows movement of the various sample and processing liquids through the column bed, may be attached to the column body, is strong enough to withstand the bed packing process, is strong enough to hold the column bed of beads, and does not interfere with the extraction process i.e. does not adsorb or denature the sample molecules.
The frit can be attached to the column body by any means which results in a stable attachment. For example, the screen can be bonded to the column body through welding or gluing. Gluing can be done with any suitable glue, e.g., silicone, cyanoacrylate glue, epoxy glue, and the like. The glue or weld joint must have the strength required to withstand the process of packing the bed of extraction medium and to contain the extraction medium with the chamber. For glue joints, a glue should be selected employed that does not adsorb or denature the sample molecules.
For example, glue can be used to attach a membrane to the tip of a pipet tip-based extraction column, i.e., a column wherein the column body is a pipet tip. A suitable glue is applied to the end of the tip. In some cases, a rod may be inserted into the tip to prevent the glue from spreading beyond the face of the body. After the glue is applied, the tip is brought into contact with the membrane frit, thereby attaching the membrane to the tip. After attachment, the tip and membrane may be brought down against a hard flat surface and rubbed in a circular motion to ensure complete attachment of the membrane to the column body. After drying, the excess membrane may be trimmed from the column with a razor blade.
Alternatively, the column body can be welded to the membrane by melting the body into the membrane, or melting the membrane into the body, or both. In one method, a membrane is chosen such that its melting temperature is higher than the melting temperature of the body. The membrane is placed on a surface, and the body is brought down to the membrane and heated, whereby the face of the body will melt and weld the membrane to the body. The body may be heated by any of a variety of means, e.g., with a hot flat surface, hot air or ultrasonically. Immediately after welding, the weld may be cooled with air or other gas to improve the likelihood that the weld does not break apart.
Alternatively, a frit can be attached by means of an annular pip, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,833,927. This mode of attachment is particularly suited to embodiment where the frit is a membrane screen.
The frits of the invention, e.g., a membrane screen, can be made from any material that has the required physical properties as described herein. Examples of suitable materials include nylon, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, cellulose, polyethylene, nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, polyvinylidine difluoride, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polypropylene, polysulfone, metal and glass. A specific example of a membrane screen is the 43 μm pore size Spectra/Mesh® polyester mesh material which is available from Spectrum Labs (Ranch Dominguez, Calif., PN 145837).
Pore size characteristics of membrane filters can be determined, for example, by use of method #F316-30, published by ASTM International, entitled “Standard Test Methods for Pore Size Characteristics of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test.”
The polarity of the membrane screen can be important. A hydrophilic screen will promote contact with the bed and promote the air-liquid interface setting up a surface tension. A hydrophobic screen would not promote this surface tension and therefore the threshold pressures to flow would be different. A hydrophilic screen is preferred in certain embodiments of the invention.
However, depending upon the context in which the device is used, it can be preferable to use either a hydrophilic membrane, such as polyester, or a hydrophobic membrane, such as nylon, or a combination of hydrophobic and hydrophilic membranes, e.g., a hydrophilic membrane on top and hydrophilic membrane on the bottom. For example, the use of a hydrophobic membrane as the top and/or bottom frit can improve flow characteristics of the column, particularly in automated implementations of the invention, such as by means of a robotic liquid handling system. Without intending to be bound by any particularly theory of operation, it seems likely that use of a hydrophobic membrane in conjunction with aqueous solutions will generate reduced surface tension, resulting in reduced bubble point and thus reduced back pressure. Examples of hydrophobic and hydrophilic membranes would include, for example, membranes comprising nylon and polyester, respectively.
In certain embodiments of the invention, a wad of fibrous material is included in the device, which extends across the open channel between the bottom frit and the open upper end of the column body, wherein the wad of fibrous material, bottom frit and open channel define a media chamber, wherein the bed of extraction medium is positioned within the media chamber. In some embodiments, the wad of fibrous material is used in lieu of an upper frit, i.e., there is a single lower frit and a wad of fibrous material defining the media chamber. In other embodiments, both a top frit and a wad of fibrous material are used. For example, the fibrous material can be positioned within the open channel and in contact with the top frit, e.g., the wad of fibrous material can be positioned between the top frit and the open upper end, or between the bottom and top frits, i.e., within the media chamber.
The wad of fibrous material can have any of a variety of dimensions or sizes. For example, the volume of the wad in certain devices is between 1% and 1000% of the volume of the media chamber, preferably between 5% and 500%, or 10% and 100%, of the volume of the media chamber. In some embodiments, the wad of fibrous material comprises polyester or polyethylene fiber.
Without intending to be bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the wad of fibrous material can facilitate movement of solution through the bed of extraction material by acting as a wicking agent. This particularly the case where a gas such as air is present in or adjacent to the bed of extraction medium, which can increase the back pressure of moving liquid through the column, particularly where the gas is a bubble in contact with a membrane screen. A membrane screen, particularly one that is hydrophilic, can result in a relatively high bubble point that causes an increase in back pressure; the use of a wicking agent alleviates this problem.
Pump
In some modes of using the extraction columns of the invention, a pump is attached to the upper open end of the column and used to aspirated and discharge the sample from the column. The pump can take any of a variety of forms, so long as it is capable of generating a negative internal column pressure to aspirate a fluid into the column channel through the open lower end. In some embodiments of the invention the pump is also able to generate a positive internal column pressure to discharge fluid out of the open lower end. Alternatively, other methods can be used for discharging solution from the column, e.g., centrifugation.
The pump should be capable of pumping liquid or gas, and should be sufficiently strong so as to be able to draw a desired sample solution, wash solution and/or desorption solvent through the bed of extraction medium. In order evacuate liquids from the packed bed and introduce a gas such as air, it is desirable that the pump be able to blow or pull air through the column. A pump capable of generating a strong pressure will be able to more effectively blow gas through the column, driving liquid out of the interstitial volume and contributing to a more highly purified, concentrated analyte.
In some embodiments of the invention the pump is capable of controlling the volume of fluid aspirated and/or discharged from the column, e.g., a pipettor. This allows for the metered intake and outtake of solvents, which facilitates more precise elution volumes to maximize sample recovery and concentration.
Non-limiting examples of suitable pumps include a pipettor, syringe, peristaltic pump, pressurized container, centrifugal pump, electrokinetic pump, or an induction based fluidics pump. Preferred pumps have good precision, good accuracy and minimal hysteresis, can manipulate small volumes, and can be directly or indirectly controlled by a computer or other automated means, such that the pump can be used to aspirate, infuse and/or manipulate a predetermined volume of liquid. The required accuracy and precision of fluid manipulation will vary depending on the step in the extraction procedure, the enrichment of the biomolecule desired, and the dimensions of the extraction column and bed volume.
The sample solution enters the column through one end, and passes through the extraction bed or some portion of the entire length of the extraction bed, eventually exiting the channel through either the same end of the column or out the other end. Introduction of the sample solution into the column can be accomplished by any of a number of techniques for driving or drawing liquid through a channel. Examples would include use of a pump (as described above) gravity, centrifugal force, capillary action, or gas pressure to move fluid through the column. The sample solution is preferably moved through the extraction bed at a flow rate that allows for adequate contact time between the sample and extraction surface. The sample solution can be passed through the bed more than one time, either by circulating the solution through the column in the same direction two or more times, or by passing the sample back and forth through the column two or more times (e.g., by oscillating a plug or series of plugs of desorption solution through the bed). In some embodiments it is important that the pump be able to pump air, thus allowing for liquid to be blown out of the bed. Preferred pumps have good precision, good accuracy and minimal hysteresis, can manipulate small volumes, and can be directly or indirectly controlled by a computer or other automated means, such that the pump can be used to aspirate, infuse and/or manipulate a predetermined volume of liquid. The required accuracy and precision of fluid manipulation in the column will vary depending on the step in the extraction procedure, the enrichment of the biomolecule desired, and the dimensions of the column.
Solvents
Extractions of the invention typically involve the loading of analyte in a sample solution, an optional wash with a rinse solution, and elution of the analyte into a desorption solution. The nature of these solutions will now be described in greater detail.
With regard to the sample solution, it typically consists of the analyte dissolved in a solvent in which the analyte is soluble, and in which the analyte will bind to the extraction surface. Preferably, the binding is strong, resulting in the binding of a substantial portion of the analyte, and optimally substantially all of the analyte will be bound under the loading protocol used in the procedure. The solvent should also be gentle, so that the native structure and function of the analyte is retained upon desorption from the extraction surface. Typically, in the case where the analyte is a biomolecule, the solvent is an aqueous solution, typically containing a buffer, salt, and/or surfactants to solubilize and stabilize the biomolecule. Examples of sample solutions include cells lysates, hybridoma growth medium, cell-free translation or transcription reaction mixtures, extracts from tissues, organs, or biological samples, and extracts derived from biological fluids.
It is important that the sample solvent not only solubilize the analyte, but also that it is compatible with binding to the extraction phase. For example, where the extraction phase is based on ion exchange, the ionic strength of the sample solution should be buffered to an appropriate pH such that the charge of the analyte is opposite that of the immobilized ion, and the ionic strength should be relatively low to promote the ionic interaction. In the case of a normal phase extraction, the sample loading solvent should be non-polar, e.g., hexane, toluene, or the like. Depending upon the nature of the sample and extraction process, other constituents might be beneficial, e.g., reducing agents, detergents, stabilizers, denaturants, chelators, metals, etc.
A wash solution, if used, should be selected such that it will remove non-desired contaminants with minimal loss or damage to the bound analyte. The properties of the wash solution are typically intermediate between that of the sample and desorption solutions.
Desorption solvent can be introduced as either a stream or a plug of solvent. If a plug of solvent is used, a buffer plug of solvent can follow the desorption plug so that when the sample is deposited on the target, a buffer is also deposited to give the deposited sample a proper pH. An example of this is desorption from a protein G surface of IgG antibody which has been extracted from a hybridoma solution. In this example, 10 mM phosphoric acid plug at pH 2.5 is used to desorb the IgG from the tube. A 100 mM phosphate buffer plug at pH 7.5 follows the desorption solvent plug to bring the deposited solution to neutral pH. The deposited material can then be analyzed, e.g., by deposition on an SPR chip.
The desorption solvent should be just strong enough to quantitatively desorb the analyte while leaving strongly bound interfering materials behind. The solvents are chosen to be compatible with the analyte and the ultimate detection method. Generally, the solvents used are known conventional solvents. Typical solvents from which a suitable solvent can be selected include methylene chloride, acetonitrile (with or without small amounts of basic or acidic modifiers), methanol (containing larger amount of modifier, e.g. acetic acid or triethylamine, or mixtures of water with either methanol or acetonitrile), ethyl acetate, chloroform, hexane, isopropanol, acetone, alkaline buffer, high ionic strength buffer, acidic buffer, strong acids, strong bases, organic mixtures with acids/bases, acidic or basic methanol, tetrahydrofuran and water. The desorption solvent may be different miscibility than the sorption solvent.
In the case where the extraction involves binding of analyte to a specific cognate ligand molecule, e.g., an immobilized metal, the desorption solvent can contain a molecule that will interfere with such binding, e.g., imidazole or a metal chelator in the case of the immobilized metal.
Examples of suitable phases for solid phase extraction and desorption solvents are shown in Tables A and B.
II. Methods for Using the Extraction Columns
Generally the first step in an extraction procedure of the invention will involve introducing a sample solution containing an analyte of interest into a packed bed of extraction medium, typically in the form of a column as described above. The sample can be conveniently introduced into the separation bed by pumping the solution through the column. Note that the volume of sample solution can be much larger than the bed volume. The sample solution can optionally be passed through the column more than one time, e.g., by being pumped back and forth through the bed. This can improve adsorption of analyte, which can be particularly in cases where the analyte is of low abundance and hence maximum sample recovery is desired.
Certain embodiments of the invention are particularly suited to the processing of biological samples, where the analyte of interest is a biomolecule. Of particular relevance are biological macromolecules such as polypeptides, polynucleotides, and polysaccharides, or large complexes containing on or more of these moieties.
The sample solution can be any solution containing an analyte of interest. The invention is particularly useful for extraction and purification of biological molecules, hence the sample solution is often of biological origin, e.g., a cell lysate. In one embodiment of the invention the sample solution is a hybridoma cell culture supernatant.
One advantage of using the low bed volume columns described above is that they allow for high linear velocity of liquid flow through the column (i.e., linear flow rate) without the associated loss of performance and/or development of back pressure seen with more conventional columns. High linear velocities reduce loading time. Because of the high linear velocities employed, it is likely that most of the loading interactions are at the surface of the extraction material.
The linear flow rate through a column in (cm/min) can be determined by dividing the volumetric flow (in mL/min or cm3/min) by the cross-sectional area (in cm2). This calculation implies that the column is acting like an open tube, in that the medium is being properly penetrated by the flow of buffer/eluents. Thus, for example, the linear flow rate of a separation having a volumetric flow rate of 1 mL/min through a column with a cross-sectional area of 1 cm2 would be (1 mL/min)/(1 cm2)=1 cm/min.
An exemplary pipet tip column of the present invention might have a bed volume of 20 μL positioned in right-angle frustum (i.e., an inverted cone with the tip chopped off, where the bottom diameter is 1.2 mm and the top diameter is 2.5 mm, and the approximate bed height is 8 mm). The mean diameter is about 1.8 mm, so the mean cross-sectional area of the bed is about 0.025 cm2. At a flow rate of 1 mL/min, the linear flow rate is (1 mL/min)/(0.025 cm2)=40 cm/min. The mean cross-sectional area of the bed at the tip is about 0.011 cm2 and the linear flow rate at the tip is (1 mL/min)/(0.011 cm2)=88 cm/min. It is a feature of certain extraction columns of the invention that they can be effective in methods employing high linear flow rate exceeding flow rates previously used in conventional extraction methods. For example, the invention provides methods (and the suitable extraction columns) that employ linear flow rates of greater than 10 cm/min, 20 cm/min, 30 cm/min, 40 cm/min, 50 cm/min, 60 cm/min, 70 cm/min, 80 cm/min, 90 cm/min, 100 cm/min, 120 cm/min, 150 cm/min, 200 cm/min, 300 cm/min, or higher. In various embodiments of the invention are provided methods and columns that employ linear flow rate ranges having lower limits of 10 cm/min, 20 cm/min, 30 cm/min, 40 cm/min, 50 cm/min, 60 cm/min, 70 cm/min, 80 cm/min, 90 cm/min, 100 cm/min, 120 cm/min, 150 cm/min, or 200 cm/min; and upper limits of 50 cm/min, 60 cm/min, 70 cm/min, 80 cm/min, 90 cm/min, 100 cm/min, 120 cm/min, 150 cm/min, 200 cm/min, 300 cm/min, or higher.
Columns of the invention can accommodate a variety of flow rates, and the invention provides methods employing a wide range of flow rates, oftentimes varying at different steps of the method. In various embodiments, the flow rate of liquid passing through the bed of extraction medium falls within a range having a lower limit of 0.01 mL/min, 0.05 mL/min, 0.1 mL/min, 0.5 mL/min, 1 mL/min, 2 mL/min, or 4 mL/min and upper limit of 0.1 mL/min, 0.5 mL/min, 1 mL/min, 2 mL/min, 4 mL/min, 6 mL/min, 10 mL/min or greater. For example, some embodiments of the invention involve passing a liquid though a packed bed of medium having a volume of less than 100 μL at a flow rate of between about 0.1 and about 4 mL/min, or between about 0.5 and 2 mL/min, e.g., a small packed bed of extraction medium as described elsewhere herein. In another example, other embodiments of the invention involve passing a liquid though a packed bed of medium having a volume of less than 25 μL at a flow rate of between about 0.1 and about 4 mL/min, or between about 0.5 and 2 mL/min.
In some cases, it is desirable to perform one or more steps of a purification process at a relatively slow flow rate, e.g., the loading and/or wash steps, to maximize binding of an analyte of interest to an extraction medium. To facilitate such methods, in certain embodiments the invention provides a pipette comprising a body; a microprocessor; an electrically driven actuator disposed within the body, the actuator in communication with and controlled by the microprocessor; a displacement assembly including a displacing piston moveable within one end of a displacement cylinder having a displacement chamber and having another end with an aperture, wherein said displacing piston is connected to and controlled by said actuator; and a pipette tip in communication with said aperture, wherein the microprocessor is programmable to cause movement of the piston in the cylinder at a rate that results in drawing a liquid into the pipette tip at a desired flow when the tip is in communication with the liquid. The flow rate can be relatively slow, such as the slow flow rates described above, e.g., between about 0.1 and 4 mL/min.
The pipette tip can be a pipette tip column of the invention, e.g., a pipette tip comprising a tip body having an open upper end, an open lower end, and an open channel between the upper and lower ends of the tip body; a bottom frit bonded to and extending across the open channel; a top frit bonded to and extending across the open channel between the bottom frit and the open upper end of the tip body, wherein the top frit, bottom frit, and column body define a media chamber; and a bed of medium positioned inside the media chamber.
In some embodiments, the microprocessor is external to the body of the pipettor, e.g., an external PC programmed to control a sample processing procedure. In some embodiments the piston is driven by a motor, e.g., a stepper motor.
The invention provides a pipettor (such as a multi-channel pipettor) suitable for acting as the pump in methods such as those described above. In some embodiments the pipettor comprises an electrically driven actuator. The electrically driven actuator can be controlled by a microprocessor, e.g., a programmable microprocessor. In various embodiments the microprocessor can be either internal or external to the pipettor body. In certain embodiments the microprocessor is programmed to pass a pre-selected volume of solution through the bed of medium at a pre-selected flow rate.
The back pressure of a column will depend on the average bead size, bead size distribution, average bed length, average cross sectional area of the bed, back pressure due to the frit and viscosity of flow rate of the liquid passing through the bed. For a 10 uL bed described in this application, the backpressure at 2 mL/min flow rate ranged from 0.5 to 2 psi. Other columns dimensions will result in backpressures ranging from, e.g., 0.1 psi to 30 psi depending on the parameters described above. The average flow rate ranges from 0.05 mL/min to 10 mL/min, but will commonly be 0.1 to 2 mL/min range with 0.2-1 mL/min flow rate being most common for the 10 uL bed columns.
In some embodiments, the invention provides columns characterized by small bed volumes, small average cross-sectional areas, and/or low backpressures. This is in contrast to previously reported columns having small bed volumes but having higher backpressures, e.g., for use in HPLC. Examples include backpressures under normal operating conditions (e.g., 2 mL/min in a column with 10 μL bed) less than 30 psi, less than 10 psi, less than 5 psi, less than 2 psi, less than 1 psi, less than 0.5 psi, less than 0.1 psi, less than 0.05 psi, less than 0.01 psi, less than 0.005 psi, or less than 0.001 psi. Thus, some embodiments of the invention involve ranges of backpressures extending from a lower limit of 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 or 20 psi, to an upper limit of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 psi (1 psi=6.8948 kPa). An advantage of low back pressures is there is much less tendency of soft resins, e.g., low-crosslinked agarose or sepharose-based beads, to collapse. Because of the low backpressures, many of these columns can be run using only gravity to drive solution through the column. Other technologies having higher backpressures need a higher pressure to drive solution through, e.g., centrifugation at relatively high speed. This limits the use of these types of columns to resin beads that can withstand this pressure without collapsing.
The term “cross-sectional area” refers to the area of a cross section of the bed of extraction medium, i.e., a planar section of the bed generally perpendicular to the flow of solution through the bed and parallel to the frits. In the case of a cylindrical or frustoconical bed, the cross section is generally circular and the cross sectional area is simply the area of the circle (area=pi×r2). In embodiments of the invention where the cross sectional area varies throughout the bed, such as the case in many of the embodiments described herein having a tapered, frustoconical shape, the average cross-sectional area is an average of the cross sectional areas of the bed. As a good approximation, the average cross-sectional area of a frustoconical bed is the average of the circular cross-sections at each end of the bed. The average cross-sectional area of the bed of extraction medium can be quite small in some of the columns of the invention, particularly low backpressure columns. Examples include cross-sectional areas of less than about 100 mm2, less than about 50 mm2, less than about 20 mm2, less than about 10 mm2, less than about 5 mm2, or less than about 1 mm2. Thus, some embodiments of the invention involve ranges of backpressures extending from a lower limit of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 or 20 mm2 to an upper limit of 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 mm2.
After the sample solution has been introduced into the bed and analyte allowed to adsorb, the sample solution is substantially evacuated from the bed, leaving the bound analyte. It is not necessary that all sample solution be evacuated from the bed, but diligence in removing the solution can improve the purity of the final product. An optional wash step between the adsorption and desorption steps can also improve the purity of the final product. Typically water or a buffer is used for the wash solution. The wash solution is preferably one that will, with a minimal desorption of the analyte of interest, remove excess matrix materials, lightly adsorbed or non-specifically adsorbed materials so that they do not come off in the elution cycle as contaminants. The wash cycle can include solvent or solvents having a specific pH, or containing components that promote removal of materials that interact lightly with the extraction phase. In some cases, several wash solvents might be used in succession to remove specific material, e.g., PBS followed by water. These cycles can be repeated as many times as necessary. In other cases, where light contamination can be tolerated, a wash cycle can be omitted.
In some embodiments, prior to desorption of the analyte from the extraction medium, gas is passed through the extraction bed as a means of displacing liquid from the interstitial volume of the bed. The gas can comprise nitrogen, e.g., air or pure nitrogen. This liquid is typically made up of residual sample solution and/or wash solution. By minimizing the presence of this unwanted solution from the bed prior to introduction of desorption solvent, it is possible to obtain superior purification and concentration than could otherwise be achieved. In some embodiments of the invention this introduction of gas results in a majority of the interstitial volume being occupied by gas (i.e., free of liquid). In some embodiments greater than 70%, 80% 90% or even 95% percent of the interstitial volume is occupied by gas. While it is often desirable to blow out as much free liquid from the bed as possible, it is also important in many cases to preserve the hydration of the beads, e.g., in the case of gel bead such as agarose. Preservation of bead hydration can in some cases improve the stability of bound analytes, particularly biomolecules. In these cases care should be taken to avoid excessive drying of the bed during introduction of gas. The nature of the gas is not usually critical, and typically the use of air is the most convenient and economical ways of achieving the desired removal of liquid from the bed.
The introduction of air can be concurrent with the evacuation of sample solution and/or evacuation of wash solution from the bed. Thus, after running the solution through the bed, the solution is blown out with air. In order to accomplish this most effectively, a pump should be used that can accurately pump liquid and that can also blow (or pull) air through the bed.
The volume of desorption solvent used can be very small, approximating the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium. In certain embodiments of the invention the amount of desorption solvent used is less than 10-fold greater than the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium, more preferably less than 5-fold greater than the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium, still more preferably less than 3-fold greater than the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium, still more preferably less than 2-fold greater than the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium, and most preferably is equal to or less than the interstitial volume of the bed of extraction medium. For example, ranges of desorption solvent volumes appropriate for use with the invention can have a lower limit of 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%, 200% or 300% of the interstitial volume, and an upper limit of 50%, 100%, 200%, 300%, 400%, 500%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%, or 1000% of the interstitial volume, e.g., 10 to 200% of the interstitial volume, 20 to 100% of the interstitial volume, 10 to 50%, 100% to 500%, 200 to 1000%, etc., of the interstitial volume.
Alternatively, the volume of desorption solvent used can be quantified in terms of percent of bed volume (i.e., the total volume of the medium plus interstitial space) rather than percent of interstitial volume. For example, ranges of desorption solvent volumes appropriate for use with the invention can have a lower limit of 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%, 200% or 300% of the bed volume, and an upper limit of 50%, 100%, 200%, 300%, 400%, 500%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%, or 1000% of the bed volume, e.g., 10 to 200% of the bed volume, 20 to 100% of the bed volume 10 to 50%, 100% to 500%, 200 to 1000%, etc., of the bed volume.
In some embodiments of the invention, the amount of desorption solvent introduced into the column is less than 100 μL, less than 20 μL, less than 15 μL, less than 10 μL, less than 5 μL, or less than 1 uL. For example, ranges of desorption solvent volumes appropriate for use with the invention can have a lower limit of 0.1 μL, 0.2 μL, 0.3 μL, 0.5 μL, 1 μL, 2 μL, 3 μL, 5 μL, or 10 μL, and an upper limit of 2 μL, 3 μL, 5 μL, 10 μL, 15 μL, 20 μL, 30 μL, 50 μL, or 100 μL, e.g., in between 1 and 15 μL, 0.1 and 10 μL, or 0.1 and 2 μL.
The use of small volumes of desorption solution enables one to achieve high enrichment factors in the described methods. The term “enrichment factor” as used herein is defined as the ratio of the sample volume divided by the elution volume, assuming that there is no contribution of liquid coming from the dead volume. To the extent that the dead volume either dilutes the analytes or prevents complete adsorption, the enrichment factor is reduced. For example, if 1000 μL of sample solution is loaded onto the column and the bound analyte eluted in 10 μL of desorption solution, the calculated enrichment factor is 100. Note that the calculated enrichment factor is the maximum enrichment that can be achieved with complete capture and release of analyte. Actual achieved enrichments will typically lower due to the incomplete nature of most binding and release steps. Various embodiments of the invention can achieve ranges of enrichment factors having a lower limit of 1, 10, 100, or 1000, and an upper limit of 10, 100, 1000, 10,000 or 100,000.
Sometimes in order to improve recovery it is desirable to pass the desorption solvent through the extraction bed multiple times, e.g., by repeatedly aspirating and discharge the desorption solvent through the extraction bed and lower end of the column. Step elutions can be performed to remove materials of interest in a sequential manner. Air may be introduced into the bed at this point (or at any other point in the procedure), but because of the need to control the movement of the liquid through the bed, it is not preferred.
The desorption solvent will vary depending upon the nature of the analyte and extraction medium. For example, where the analyte is a his-tagged protein and the extraction medium an IMAC resin, the desorption solution will contain imidazole or the like to release the protein from the resin. In some cases desorption is achieved by a change in pH or ionic strength, e.g., by using low pH or high ionic strength desorption solution. A suitable desorption solution can be arrived at using available knowledge by one of skill in the art.
Extraction columns and devices of the invention should be stored under conditions that preserve the integrity of the extraction medium. For example, columns containing agarose- or sepharose-based extraction medium should be stored under cold conditions (e.g., 4 degrees Celsius) and in the presence of 0.01 percent sodium azide or 20 percent ethanol. Prior to extraction, a conditioning step may be employed. This step is to ensure that the tip is in a uniform ready condition, and can involve treating with a solvent and/or removing excess liquid from the bed. If agarose or similar gel materials are used, the bed should be kept fully hydrated before use.
Often it is desirable to automate the method of the invention. For that purpose, the subject invention provides a device for performing the method comprising a column containing a packed bed of extraction medium, a pump attached to one end of said column, and an automated means for actuating the pump.
The automated means for actuating the pump can be controlled by software. This software controls the pump, and can be programmed to introduce desired liquids into a column, as well as to evacuating the liquid by the positive introduction of gas into the column if so desired.
Multiplexing
In some embodiments of the invention a plurality of columns is run in a parallel fashion, e.g., multiplexed. This allows for the simultaneous, parallel processing of multiple samples. A description of multiplexing of extraction capillaries is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/434,713 and 10/733,534, and the same general approach can be applied to the columns and devices of the subject invention.
Multiplexing can be accomplished, for example, by arranging the columns in parallel so that fluid can be passed through them concurrently. When a pump is used to manipulate fluids through the column, each column in the multiplex array can have its own pump, e.g., syringe pumps activated by a common actuator. Alternatively, columns can be connected to a common pump, a common vacuum device, or the like. In another example of a multiplex arrangement, the plurality of columns is arranged in a manner such that they can be centrifuged, with fluid being driven through the columns by centrifugal force.
In one embodiment, sample can be arrayed from an extraction column to a plurality of predetermined locations, for example locations on a chip or microwells in a multi-well plate. A precise liquid processing system can be used to dispense the desired volume of eluant at each location. For example, an extraction column containing bound analyte takes up 50 μL of desorption solvent, and 1 μL drops are spotted into microwells using a robotic system such as those commercially available from Zymark (e.g., the SciClone sample handler), Tecan (e.g., the Genesis NPS, Aquarius or TeMo) or Cartesian Dispensing (e.g., the Honeybee bench-top system), Packard (e.g., the MiniTrak5, Evolution, Platetrack. or Apricot), Beckman (e.g., the FX-96) and Matrix (e.g., the Plate Mate 2 or SerialMate). This can be used for high-throughput assays, crystallizations, etc.
In some embodiments, the invention provides a multiplexed extraction system comprising a plurality of extraction columns of the invention, e.g., low dead volume pipette tip columns having small beds of packed gel resins. The system can be automated or manually operated. The system can include a pump or pump in operative engagement with the extraction columns, useful for pumping fluid through the columns in a multiplex fashion, i.e., concurrently. In some embodiments, each column is addressable. The term “addressable” refers to the ability of the fluid manipulation mechanism, e.g., the pumps, to individually address each column. An addressable column is one in which the flow of fluid through the column can be controlled independently from the flow through any other column which may be operated in parallel. In practice, this means that the pumping means in at least one of the extraction steps is in contact and control of each individual column independent of all the other columns. For example, when syringe pumps are used, i.e., pumps capable of manipulating fluid within the column by the application of positive or negative pressure, then separate syringes are used at each column, as opposed to a single vacuum attached to multiple syringes. Because the columns are addressable, a controlled amount of liquid can be accurately manipulated in each column. In a non-addressable system, such as where a single pump is applied to multiple columns, the liquid handling can be less precise. For example, if the back pressure differs between multiplexed columns, then the amount of liquid entering each column and/or the flow rate can vary substantially in a non-addressable system. Various embodiments of the invention can also include samples racks, instrumentation for controlling fluid flow, e.g., for pump control, etc. The controller can be manually operated or operated by means of a computer. The computerized control is typically driven by the appropriate software, which can be programmable, e.g., by means of user-defined scripts.
The invention also provides software for implementing the methods of the invention. For example, the software can be programmed to control manipulation of solutions and addressing of columns into sample vials, collection vials, for spotting or introduction into some analytical device for further processing.
The invention also includes kits comprising one or more reagents and/or articles for use in a process relating to solid-phase extraction, e.g., buffers, standards, solutions, columns, sample containers, etc.
Step and Multi-Dimensional Elutions
In some embodiments of the invention, desorption solvent gradients, step elutions and/or multidimensional elutions are performed.
The use of gradients is well known in the art of chromatography, and is described in detail, for example in a number of the general chromatography references cited herein. As applied to the extraction columns of the invention, the basic principle involves adsorbing an analyte to the extraction medium and then eluting with a desorption solvent gradient. The gradient refers to the changing of at least one characteristic of the solvent, e.g., change in pH, ionic strength, polarity, or the concentration of some agent that influence the strength of the binding interaction. The gradient can be with respect to the concentration of a chemical that entity that interferes with or stabilizes an interaction, particularly a specific binding interaction. For example, where the affinity binding agent is an immobilized metal the gradient can be in the concentration of imidazole, EDTA, etc. In some embodiments, the result is fractionation of a sample, useful in contexts such as gel-free shotgun proteomics.
As used herein, the term “dimension” refers to some property of the desorption solvent that is varied, e.g., pH, ionic strength, etc. An elution scheme that involves variation of two or more dimensions, either simultaneously or sequentially, is referred to as a multi-dimensional elution.
Gradients used in the context of the invention can be step elutions. In one embodiment, two or more elution steps are performed using different desorption solvents (i.e., elution solvents) that vary in one or more dimensions. For example, the two or more solvents can vary in pH, ionic strength, hydrophobicity, or the like. The volume of desorption solution used in each dimension can be quite small, and can be passed back and forth through the bed of extraction medium multiple times and at a rate that is conducive to maximal recovery of desired analyte. Optionally, the column can be purged with gas prior between steps in the gradient.
In some embodiments of the invention a multidimensional stepwise solid phase extraction is employed. This is particularly useful in the analysis of isotope-coded affinity tagged (ICAT) peptides, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/434,713 and references cited therein. A multi-dimensional extraction involves varying at least two desorption condition dimensions.
In a typical example, a stepwise elution is performed in one dimension, collecting fractions for each change in elution conditions. For example, a stepwise increase in ionic strength could be employed where the extraction phase is based on ion exchange. The eluted fractions are then introduced into a second extraction column (either directly or after collection into an intermediate holding vessel) and in this case separated in another dimension, e.g., by reverse-phase, or by binding to an affinity binding group such as avidin or immobilized metal.
In some embodiments, one or more dimensions of a multidimensional extraction are achieved by means other than an extraction column of the invention. For example, the first dimension separation might be accomplished using conventional chromatography, electrophoresis, or the like, and the fractions then loaded on an extraction column for separation in another dimension.
Note that in many cases the elution of a protein will not be a simple on-off process. That is, some desorption buffers will result in only partial release of analyte. The composition of the desorption buffer can be optimized for the desired outcome, e.g., complete or near complete elution. Alternatively, when step elution is employed two or more successive steps in the elution might result in incremental elution of fraction of an analyte. These incremental partial elution can be useful in characterizing the analyte, e.g., in the analysis of a multi-protein complex as described below.
Purification of Classes of Proteins
Extraction columns can be used to purify entire classes of proteins on the basis of highly conserved motifs within their structure, whereby an affinity binding agent is used that reversibly binds to the conserved motif. For example, it is possible to immobilize particular nucleotides on the extraction medium. These nucleotides include adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP), adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP), adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP). These nucleotides can be used for the purification of enzymes that are dependent upon these nucleotides such as kinases, phosphatases, heat shock proteins and dehydrogenases, to name a few.
There are other affinity groups that can be immobilized on the extraction medium for purification of protein classes. Lectins can be employed for the purification of glycoproteins. Concanavalin A (Con A) and lentil lectin can be immobilized for the purification of glycoproteins and membrane proteins, and wheat germ lectin can be used for the purification of glycoproteins and cells (especially T-cell lymphocytes). Though it is not a lectin, the small molecule phenylboronic acid can also be immobilized and used for purification of glycoproteins.
It is also possible to immobilize heparin, which is useful for the purification of DNA-binding proteins (e.g. RNA polymerase I, II and III, DNA polymerase, DNA ligase). In addition, immobilized heparin can be used for purification of various coagulation proteins (e.g. antithrombin III, Factor VII, Factor IX, Factor XI, Factor XII and XIIa, thrombin), other plasma proteins (e.g. properdin, BetaIH, Fibronectin, Lipases), lipoproteins (e.g. VLDL, LDL, VLDL apoprotein, HOLP, to name a few), and other proteins (platelet factor 4, hepatitis B surface antigen, hyaluronidase). These types of proteins are often blood and/or plasma borne. Since there are many efforts underway to rapidly profile the levels of these types of proteins by technologies such as protein chips, the performance of these chips will be enhanced by performing an initial purification and enrichment of the targets prior to protein chip analysis.
It is also possible to attach protein interaction domains to extraction medium for purification of those proteins that are meant to interact with that domain. One interaction domain that can be immobilized on the extraction medium is the Src-homology 2 (SH2) domain that binds to specific phosphotyrosine-containing peptide motifs within various proteins. The SH2 domain has previously been immobilized on a resin and used as an affinity reagent for performing affinity chromatography/mass spectrometry experiments for investigating in vitro phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (see Christian Lombardo, et al., Biochemistry, 34:16456 (1995)). Other than the SH2 domain, other protein interaction domains can be immobilized for the purposes of purifying those proteins that possess their recognition domains. Many of these protein interaction domains have been described (see Tony Pawson, Protein Interaction Domains, Cell Signaling Technology Catalog, 264-279 (2002)) for additional examples of these protein interaction domains).
As another class-specific affinity ligand, benzamidine can be immobilized on the extraction medium for purification of serine proteases. The dye ligand Procion Red HE-3B can be immobilized for the purification of dehydrogenases, reductases and interferon, to name a few.
In another example, synthetic peptides, peptide analogs and/or peptide derivatives can be used to purify proteins, classes of proteins and other biomolecules that specifically recognize peptides. For example, certain classes of proteases recognize specific sequences, and classes of proteases can be purified based on their recognition of a particular peptide-based affinity binding agent.
Multi-Protein Complexes
In certain embodiments, extraction columns of the invention are used to extract and/or process multi-protein complexes. This is accomplished typically by employing a sample solution that is sufficiently non-denaturing that it does not result in disruption of a protein complex or complexes of interest, i.e., the complex is extracted from a biological sample using a sample solution and extraction conditions that stabilize the association between the constituents of the complex. As used herein, the term multi-protein complex refers to a complex of two or more proteins held together by mutually attractive chemical forces, typically non-covalent interactions. Covalent attachments would typically be reversible, thus allowing for recovery of component proteins.
In some embodiments, multi-protein complex is adsorbed to the extraction surface and desorbed under conditions such that the integrity of the complex is retained throughout. That is, the product of the extraction is the intact complex, which can then be collected and stored, or directly analyzed (either as a complex or a mixture of proteins), for example by any of the analytical methodologies described herein.
One example involves the use of a recombinant “bait” protein that will form complexes with its natural interaction partners. These multiprotein complexes are then purified through a fusion tag that is attached to the “bait.” These tagged “bait” proteins can be purified through affinity reagents such as metal-chelate groups, antibodies, calmodulin, or any of the other surface groups employed for the purification of recombinant proteins. The identity of the cognate proteins can then be determined by any of a variety of means, such as MS.
It is also possible to purify “native” (i.e. non-recombinant) protein complexes without having to purify through a fusion tag. For example, this can be achieved by using as an affinity binding reagent an antibody for one of the proteins within the multiprotein complex. This process is often referred to as “co-immunoprecipitation.” The multiprotein complexes can be eluted, for example, by means of low pH buffer.
In some embodiments, the multi-protein complex is loaded onto the column as a complex, and the entire complex or one or more constituents are desorbed and eluted. In other embodiments, one or more complex constituents are first adsorbed to the extraction surface, and subsequently one or more other constituents are applied to the extraction surface, such that complex formation occurs on the extraction surface.
In another embodiment, the extraction columns of the invention can be used as a tool to analyze the nature of the complex. For example, the protein complex is desorbed to the extraction surface, and the state of the complex is then monitored as a function of solvent variation. A desorption solvent, or series of desorption solvents, can be employed that result in disruption of some or all of the interactions holding the complex together, whereby some subset of the complex is released while the rest remains adsorbed. The identity and state (e.g., post-translational modifications) of the proteins released can be determined often, using, for example, MS. Thus, in this manner constituents and/or sub-complexes of a protein complex can be individually eluted and analyzed. The nature of the desorption solvent can be adjusted to favor or disfavor interactions that hold protein complexes together, e.g., hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals forces, and covalent interactions, e.g., disulfide bridges. For example, by decreasing the polarity of a desorption solvent hydrophobic interactions will be weakened-inclusion of reducing agent (such as mercaptoethanol or dithiothrietol) will disrupt disulfide bridges. Other solution variations would include alteration of pH, change in ionic strength, and/or the inclusion of a constituent that specifically or non-specifically affects protein-protein interactions, or the interaction of a protein or protein complex with a non-protein biomolecule.
In one embodiment, a series of two or more desorption solvents is used sequentially, and the eluent is monitored to determine which protein constituents come off at a particular solvent. In this way it is possible to assess the strength and nature of interactions in the complex. For example, if a series of desorption solvents of increasing strength is used (e.g., increasing ionic strength, decreasing polarity, changing pH, change in ionic composition, etc.), then the more loosely bound proteins or sub-complexes will elute first, with more tightly bound complexes eluting only as the strength of the desorption solvent is increased.
In some embodiments, at least one of the desorption solutions used contains an agent that effects ionic interactions. The agent can be a molecule that participates in a specific interaction between two or more protein constituents of a multi-protein complex, e.g., Mg-ATP promotes the interaction and mutual binding of certain protein cognates. Other agents that can affect protein interactions are denaturants such as urea, guanadinium chloride, and isothiocyanate, detergents such as triton X-100, chelating groups such as EDTA, etc.
In other sets of experiments, the integrity of a protein complex can be probed through modifications (e.g., post-translational or mutations) in one or more of the proteins. Using the methods described herein the effect of the modification upon the stability or other properties of the complex can be determined.
In some embodiments of the invention, multidimensional solid phase extraction techniques, as described in more detail elsewhere herein, are employed to analyze multiprotein complexes.
Recovery of Native Proteins
In some embodiments, the extraction devices and methods of the invention are used to purify proteins that are functional, active and/or in their native state, i.e., non-denatured. This is accomplished by performing the extraction process under non-denaturing conditions. Non-denaturing conditions encompasses the entire protein extraction process, including the sample solution, the wash solution (if used), the desorption solution, the extraction phase, and the conditions under which the extraction is accomplished. General parameters that influence protein stability are well known in the art, and include temperature (usually lower temperatures are preferred), pH, ionic strength, the use of reducing agents, surfactants, elimination of protease activity, protection from physical shearing or disruption, radiation, etc. The particular conditions most suited for a particular protein, class of proteins, or protein-containing composition vary somewhat from protein to protein.
One particular aspect of the extraction technology of the invention that facilitates non-denaturing extraction is that the process can be accomplished at low temperatures. In particular, because solution flow through the column can be done without introducing heat, e.g., without the introduction of electrical current or the generation of joule heat that typically accompanies capillary processes involving chromatography or electroosmotic flow, the process can be carried out at lower temperatures. Lower temperature could be room temperature, or even lower, e.g., if the process is carried out in a cold room, or a cooling apparatus is used to cool the capillary. For example, extractions can be performed at a temperature as low as 0° C., 2° C. or 4° C., e.g., in a range such as 0° C. to 30° C., 0° C. to 20° C., 2° C. to 30° C., 2° C. to 20° C., 4° C. to 30° C., or 4° C. to 20° C.
Another aspect of extraction as described herein that allows for purification of native proteins is that the extraction process can be completed quickly, thus permitting rapid separation of a protein from proteases or other denaturing agents present in sample solution. The speed of the process allows for quickly getting the protein from the sample solution to the analytical device for which it is intended, or to storage conditions that promote stability of the protein. In various embodiments of the invention, protein extractions of the invention can be accomplished in less than 1 minute, less than 2 minutes, less than 5 minutes, less than 10 minutes, less than 15 minutes, less than 20 minutes, less than 60 minutes, or less than 120 minutes.
In another aspect, extracted protein is sometimes stabilized by maintaining it in a hydrated form during the extraction process. For example, if a purge step is used to remove bulk liquid (i.e., liquid segments) from the column prior to desorption, care is taken to ensure that gas is not blown through the bed for an excessive amount of time, thus avoiding drying out the extraction medium and possibly desolvating the extraction phase and/or protein.
In another embodiment, the extraction process is performed under conditions that do not irreversibly denature the protein. Thus, even if the protein is eluted in a denatured state, the protein can be renatured to recover native and/or functional protein. In this embodiment, the protein is adsorbed to the extraction surface under conditions that do not irreversibly denature the protein, and eluting the protein under conditions that do not irreversibly denature the protein. The conditions required to prevent irreversible denaturation are similar to those that are non-denaturing, but in some cases the requirements are not as stringent. For example, the presence of a denaturant such as urea, isothiocyanate or guanidinium chloride can cause reversible denaturation. The eluted protein is denatured, but native protein can be recovered using techniques known in the art, such as dialysis to remove denaturant. Likewise, certain pH conditions or ionic conditions can result in reversible denaturation, readily reversed by altering the pH or buffer composition of the eluted protein.
The recovery of non-denatured, native, functional and/or active protein is particularly useful as a preparative step for use in processes that require the protein to be denatured in order for the process to be successful. Non-limiting examples of such processes include analytical methods such as binding studies, activity assays, enzyme assays, X-ray crystallography and NMR.
In another embodiment, the invention is used to stabilize RNA. This can be accomplished by separating the RNA from some or substantially all RNase activity, enzymatic or otherwise, that might be present in a sample solution. In one example, the RNA itself is extracted and thereby separated from RNase in the sample. In another example, the RNase activity is extracted from a solution, with stabilized RNA flowing through the column. Extraction of RNA can be sequence specific or non-sequence specific. Extraction of RNase activity can be specific for a particular RNase or class of RNAses, or can be general, e.g., extraction of proteins or subset of proteins.
Extraction Tube as Sample Transfer Medium
In certain embodiments, an extraction column can function not only as a separation device, but also as a means for collecting, transporting, storing and or dispensing a liquid sample.
For example, in one embodiment the extraction column is transportable, and can be readily transported from one location to another. Note that this concept of transportability refers to the extraction devices that can be easily transported, either manually or by an automated mechanism (e.g., robotics), during the extraction process. This is to be distinguished from other systems that employ a column in a manner such that it is stably connected to a device that is not readily portable, e.g., n HPLC instrument. While one can certainly move such an instrument, for example when installing it in a laboratory, during use the column remains stably attached to the stationary instrument. In contrast, in certain embodiments of the invention the column is transported.
In another embodiment, an extraction column is transportable to the site where the eluted sample is destined, e.g., a storage vessel or an analytical instrument. For example, the column, with analyte bound, can be transported to an analytical instrument, to a chip, an arrayer, etc, and eluted directly into or onto the intended target. In one embodiment, the column is transported to an electrospray ionization chamber and eluted directly therein. In another embodiment, the column is transported to a chip or MALDI target and the analyte spotted directly on the target.
In some embodiments of the invention involving transportable column or column devices, the entire column is transported, e.g., on the end of a syringe, or just the bare column or a portion thereof.
Thus, in various embodiments the invention provides a transportable extraction device, which includes the extraction column and optionally other associated components, e.g., pump, holder, etc. The term “transportable” refers to the ability of an operator of the extraction to transport the column, either manually or by automated means, during the extraction process, e.g., during sample uptake, washing, or elution, or between any of these steps. This is to be distinguished from non-transportable extraction devices, such as an extraction column connected to a stationary instrument, such that the column is not transported, nor is it convenient to transport the column, during normal operation.
Method for Desalting a Sample
In some embodiments, the invention is used to change the composition of a solution in which an analyte is present. An example is the desalting of a sample, where some or substantially all of the salt (or other constituent) in a sample is removed or replaced by a different salt (or non-salt constituent). The removal of potentially interfering salt from a sample prior to analysis is important in a number of analytical techniques, e.g., mass spectroscopy. These processes will be generally referred to herein as “desalting,” with the understanding that the term can encompass any of a wide variety of processes involving alteration of the solvent or solution in which an analyte is present, e.g., buffer exchange or ion replacement.
In some embodiments, desalting is accomplished by extraction of the analyte, removal of salt, and desorption into the desired final solution. For example, the analyte can be adsorbed in a reverse phase, ion pairing or hydrophobic interaction extraction process. In some embodiments, the process will involve use of a hydrophobic interaction extraction phase, e.g., benzyl or a reverse extraction phase, e.g., C8, C18 or polymeric. There are numerous other possibilities; e.g., virtually any type of reverse phase found on a conventional chromatography packing particle can be employed.
An anion exchanger can be used to adsorb an analyte, such as a protein at a pH above its isoelectric point. Desorption can be facilitated by eluting at a pH below the isoelectric point, but this is not required, e.g., elution can be accomplished by displacement using a salt or buffer. Likewise, a cation exchanger can be used to adsorb protein at a pH below its isoelectric point, or a similar analyte.
Analytical Techniques
Extraction columns and associated methods of the invention find particular utility in preparing samples of analyte for analysis or detection by a variety of analytical techniques. In particular, the methods are useful for purifying an analyte, class of analytes, aggregate of analytes, etc, from a biological sample, e.g., a biomolecule originating in a biological fluid. It is particularly useful for use with techniques that require small volumes of pure, concentrated analyte. In many cases, the results of these forms of analysis are improved by increasing analyte concentration. In some embodiments of the invention the analyte of interest is a protein, and the extraction serves to purify and concentrate the protein prior to analysis. The methods are particular suited for use with label-free detection methods or methods that require functional, native (i.e., non-denatured protein), but are generally useful for any protein or nucleic acid of interest.
These methods are particularly suited for application to proteomic studies, the study of protein-protein interactions, and the like. The elucidation of protein-protein interaction networks, preferably in conjunction with other types of data, allows assignment of cellular functions to novel proteins and derivation of new biological pathways. See, e.g., Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2003 4(3):159-81.
Many of the current detection and analytical methodologies can be applied to very small sample volumes, but often require that the analyte be enriched and purified in order to achieve acceptable results. Conventional sample preparation technologies typically operate on a larger scale, resulting in waste because they produce more volume than is required. This is particularly a problem where the amount of starting sample is limited, as is the case with many biomolecules. These conventional methods are generally not suited for working with the small volumes required for these new methodologies. For example, the use of conventional packed bed chromatography techniques tend to require larger solvent volumes, and are not suited to working with such small sample volumes for a number of reasons, e.g., because of loss of sample in dead volumes, on frits, etc. See U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/434,713 for a more in-depth discussion of problems associated with previous technologies in connection with the enrichment and purification of low abundance biomolecules.
In certain embodiments, the invention involves the direct analysis of analyte eluted from an extraction column without any intervening sample processing step, e.g., concentration, desalting or the like, provided the method is designed correctly. Thus, for example, a sample can be eluted from a column and directly analyzed by MS, SPR or the like. This is a distinct advantage over other sample preparation methods that require concentration, desalting or other processing steps before analysis. These extra steps can increase the time and complexity of the experiment, and can result in significant sample loss, which poses a major problem when working with low abundance analytes and small volumes.
One example of such an analytical technique is mass spectroscopy (MS). In application of mass spectrometry for the analysis of biomolecules, the molecules are transferred from the liquid or solid phases to gas phase and to vacuum phase. Since many biomolecules are both large and fragile (proteins being a prime example), two of the most effective methods for their transfer to the vacuum phase are matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) or electrospray ionization (ESI). Some aspects of the use of these methods, and sample preparation requirements, are discussed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/434,713. In general ESI is more sensitive, while MALDI is faster. Significantly, some peptides ionize better in MALDI mode than ESI, and vice versa (Genome Technology, June 220, p 52). The extraction methods and devices of the instant invention are particularly suited to preparing samples for MS analysis, especially biomolecule samples such as proteins. An important advantage of the invention is that it allows for the preparation of an enriched sample that can be directly analyzed, without the need for intervening process steps, e.g., concentration or desalting.
ESI is performed by mixing the sample with volatile acid and organic solvent and infusing it through a conductive needle charged with high voltage. The charged droplets that are sprayed (or ejected) from the needle end are directed into the mass spectrometer, and are dried up by heat and vacuum as they fly in. After the drops dry, the remaining charged molecules are directed by electromagnetic lenses into the mass detector and mass analyzed. In one embodiment, the eluted sample is deposited directly from the column into an electrospray nozzle, e.g., the column functions as the sample loader.
For MALDI, the analyte molecules (e.g., proteins) are deposited on metal targets and co-crystallized with an organic matrix. The samples are dried and inserted into the mass spectrometer, and typically analyzed via time-of-flight (TOF) detection. In one embodiment, the eluted sample is deposited directly from the column onto the metal target, e.g., the column itself functions as the sample loader. In one embodiment, the extracted analyte is deposited on a MALDI target, a MALDI ionization matrix is added, and the sample is ionized and analyzed, e.g., by TOF detection.
In other embodiments of the invention, extraction is used in conjunction with other forms of MS, e.g., other ionization modes. In general, an advantage of these methods is that they allow for the “just-in-time” purification of sample and direct introduction into the ionizing environment. It is important to note that the various ionization and detection modes introduce their own constraints on the nature of the desorption solution used, and it is important that the desorption solution be compatible with both. For example, the sample matrix in many applications must have low ionic strength, or reside within a particular pH range, etc. In ESI, salt in the sample can prevent detection by lowering the ionization or by clogging the nozzle. This problem is addressed by presenting the analyte in low salt and/or by the use of a volatile salt. In the case of MALDI, the analyte should be in a solvent compatible with spotting on the target and with the ionization matrix employed.
In some embodiments, the invention is used to prepare an analyte for use in an analytical method that involves the detection of a binding event on the surface of a solid substrate. These solid substrates are generally referred to herein as “binding detection chips,” examples of which include hybridization microarrays and various protein chips. As used herein, the term “protein chip” is defined as a small plate or surface upon which an array of separated, discrete protein samples (or “dots”) are to be deposited or have been deposited. In general, a chip bearing an array of discrete ligands (e.g., proteins) is designed to be contacted with a sample having one or more biomolecules which may or may not have the capability of binding to the surface of one or more of the dots, and the occurrence or absence of such binding on each dot is subsequently determined. A reference that describes the general types and functions of protein chips is Gavin MacBeath, Nature Genetics Supplement, 32:526 (2002). See also Ann. Rev. Biochem., 2003 72:783-812.
In general, these methods involve the detection binding between a chip-bound moiety “A” and its cognate binder “B”; i.e., detection of the reaction A+B=AB, where the formation of AB results, either directly or indirectly, in a detectable signal. Note that in this context the term “chip” can refer to any solid substrate upon which A can be immobilized and the binding of B detected, e.g., glass, metal, plastic, ceramic, membrane, etc. In many important applications of chip technology, A and/or B are biomolecules, e.g., DNA in DNA hybridization arrays or protein in protein chips. Also, in many cases the chip comprises an array multiple small, spatially-addressable spots of analyte, allowing for the efficient simultaneous performance of multiple binding experiments on a small scale.
In various embodiments, it can be beneficial to process either A or B, or both, prior to use in a chip experiment, using the extraction columns and related methodologies described herein. In general, the accuracy of chip-based methods depends upon specific detection of the AB interaction. However, in practice binding events other than authentic AB binding can have the appearance of an AB binding event, skewing the results of the analysis. For example, the presence of contaminating non-A species that have some affinity for B, contaminating non-B species having an affinity for A, or a combination of these effects, can result in a binding event that can be mistaken for a true AB binding event, or interfere with the detection of a true AB binding event. These false binding events will throw off any measurement, and in some cases can substantially compromise the ability of the system to accurately quantify the true AB binding event.
Thus, in one embodiment, an extraction column is used to purify a protein for spotting onto a protein chip, with the protein serving as A. In the production of protein chips, it is often desirable to spot the chip with very small volumes of protein, e.g., on the order of 1 μL, 100 nL, 10 nL or even less. Many embodiments of this invention are particularly suited to the efficient production of such small volumes of purified protein. The technology can also be used in a “just-in-time” purification mode, where the chip is spotted just as the protein is being purified.
Examples of protein analytes that can be beneficially processed by the technology described herein include antibodies (e.g., IgG, IgY, etc.); general affinity proteins, (e.g., scFvs, Fabs, affibodies, peptides, etc.); nucleic acids aptamers and photoaptamers as affinity molecules, and other proteins to be screened for undetermined affinity characteristics (e.g., protein libraries from model organisms). The technology is particularly useful when applied to preparation of protein samples for global proteomic analysis, for example in conjunction with the technology of Protometrix Inc. (Branford, Conn.). See, for example, Zhu et al. “Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips (2001) Science 293(5537): 2101-05; Zhu et al., “Analysis of yeast protein kinases using protein chips” (2000) Nature Genetics 26:1-7; and Michaud and Snyder “Proteomic approaches for the global analysis of proteins” (2002) BioTechniques 33:1308-16.
A variety of different approaches can be used to affix A to a chip surface, including direct/passive immobilization (can be covalent in cases of native thiols associating with gold surfaces, covalent attachment to functional groups at a chip surface (e.g., self-assembled monolayers with and without additional groups, immobilized hydrogel, etc.), non-covalent/affinity attachment to functional groups/ligands at a chip surface (e.g., Protein A or Protein G for IgGs, phenyl(di)boronic acid with salicyl hydroxamic acid groups, streptavidin monolayers with biotinylated native lysines/cysteines, etc.).
In this and related embodiments, a protein is purified and/or concentrated using an extraction method as described herein, and then spotted at a predetermined location on the chip. In certain embodiments, the protein is spotted directly from an extraction column onto the substrate. That is, the protein is extracted from a sample solution and then eluted in a desorption solution directly onto the chip. Of course, in this embodiment it is important that the desorption solution be compatible with the substrate and with any chemistry used to immobilize or affix the protein to the substrate. Typically a microarray format involves multiple spots of protein samples (the protein samples can all be the same or they can be different from one another). Multiple protein samples can be spotted sequentially or simultaneously. Simultaneous spotting can be achieved by employing a multiplex format, where an array of extraction columns is used to purify and spot multiple protein samples in parallel. The small size and portability made possible by the use of columns facilitates the direct spotting of freshly purified samples, and also permits multiplexing formats that would not be possible with bulkier conventional protein extraction devices. Particularly when very small volumes are to be spotted, it is desirable to use a pump capable of the accurate and reproducible dispensing of small volumes of liquid, as described elsewhere herein.
In another embodiment, extraction columns of the invention are used to purify B, e.g., a protein, prior to application to a chip. As with A, purified B can be applied directly to the chip, or alternatively, it can be collected from the column and then applied to the chip. The desorption solution used should be selected such that it is compatible with the chip, the chemistry involved in the immobilization of A, and with the binding and/or detection reactions. As with A, the methods of the invention allow for “just-in-time” purification of the B molecule.
A variety of extraction chemistries and approaches can be employed in the purification of A or B. For example, if a major contaminant or contaminants are known and sufficiently well-defined (e.g., albumin, fibrin, etc), an extraction chemistry can be employed that specifically removes such contaminants. Alternatively, A or B can be trapped on the extraction surface, contaminants removed by washing, and then the analyte released for use on the binding chip. This further allows for enrichment of the molecule, enhancing the sensitivity of the AB event.
The detection event requires some manner of A interacting with B, so the central player is B (since it isn't part of the protein chip itself). The means of detecting the presence of B are varied and include label-free detection of B interacting with A (e.g., surface plasmon resonance imaging as practiced by HTS Biosystems (Hopkinton, Mass.) or Biacore, Inc. (Piscataway, N.J.), microcantilever detection schemes as practiced by Protiveris, Inc. (Rockville, Md.) microcalorimetry, acoustic wave sensors, atomic force microscopy, quartz crystal microweighing, and optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS), etc). Alternatively, binding can be detected by physical labeling of B interacting with A, followed by spatial imaging of AB pair (e.g., Cy3/Cy5 differential labeling with standard fluorescent imaging as practiced by BD-Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.), radioactive ATP labeling of kinase substrates with autoradiography imaging as practiced by Jerini AG (Berlin, Germany), etc), or other suitable imaging techniques.
In the case of fluorescent tagging, one can often achieve higher sensitivity with planar waveguide imaging (as practiced by ZeptoSens (Witterswil, Switzerland)). See, for example, Voros et al. (2003) BioWorld 2-16-17; Duveneck et al. (2002) Analytica Chimica Acta 469: 49-61, Pawlak et al. (2002) Proteomics 2:383-93; Ehrat and Kresbach (2001) Chimia 55:35-39—Weinberger et al. (2000) Pharmacogenomics 395-416; Ehrat and Kresbach (2000) Chimia 54:244-46-Duveneck and Abel (1999) Review on Fluorescence-based Planar Waveguide Biosensors, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3858: 59-71; Budach et al. (1999) Anal. Chem. 71:3347-3355; Duveneck et al. (1996) A Novel Generation of Luminescence-based Biosensors: Single-Mode Planar Waveguide Sensors, Proc. SPIE, 2928:98-109; and Neuschafer et al. (1996) Planar Waveguides as Efficient Transducers for Bioaffinity Sensors, Proc. SPIE, 2836:221-234.
Binding can also be detected by interaction of AB complex with a third B-specific affinity partner C, where C is capable of generating a signal by being fluorescently tagged, or is tagged with a group that allows a chemical reaction to occur at that location (such as generation of a fluorescent moiety, direct generation of light, etc.). Detection of this AB-C binding event can occur via fluorescent imaging, (as practiced, e.g., by Zyomyx, Inc. (Hayward, Calif.) and SomaLogic Inc. (Boulder, Colo.)), chemiluminescence imaging (as practiced by HTS Biosystems and Hypromatrix Inc (Worcester, Mass.)), fluorescent imaging via waveguide technology, or other suitable detection means.
In other embodiments of the invention, similar methodology is used to extract and spot other non-protein analytes in an array format, e.g., polynucleotides, polysaccharides or natural products. Analogous to the protein chip example above, any of these analytes can be directly spotted on a microarray substrate, thus avoiding the necessity to collect purified sample in some sort of vial or microwell prior to transfer to the substrate. Of course, it is also possible to use the extraction methods of the invention to purify and collect such substrates prior to spotting, particularly if the high recovery and activity to be achieved by direct spotting is not required.
In some embodiments, the technology is used to prepare a sample prior to detection by optical biosensor technology, e.g., the BIND biosensor from SRU Biosystems (Woburn, Mass.). Various modes of this type of label-free detection are described in the following references: B. Cunningham, P. Li, B. Lin, J. Pepper, “Colorimetric resonant reflection as a direct biochemical assay technique,” Sensors and Actuators B, Volume 8 1, p. 316-328, Jan. 5, 2002; B. Cunningham, B. Lin, J. Qiu, P. Li, J. Pepper, B. Hugh, “A Plastic Colorimetric Resonant Optical Biosensor for Multiparallel Detection of Label-Free Biochemical Interactions,” Sensors & Actuators B, volume 85, number 3, pp 219-226, (November 2002); B. Lin, J. Qiu, J. Gerstemnaier, P. Li, H. Pien, J. Pepper, B. Cunningham, “A Label-Free Optical Technique for Detecting Small Molecule Interactions,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Vol. 17, No. 9, p. 827-834, September 2002; Cunningham, J. Qiu, P. Li, B. Lin, “Enhancing the Surface Sensitivity of Colorimetric Resonant Optical Biosensors,” Sensors and Actuators B, Vol. 87, No. 2, p. 365-370, December 2002, “Improved Proteomics Technologies,” Genetic Engineering News, Volume 22, Number 6, pp 74-75, Mar. 15, 2002; and “A New Method for Label-Free Imaging of Biomolecular Interactions,” P. Li, B. Lin, J. Gerstemnaier, and B. T. Cunningham, Accepted July, 2003, Sensors and Actuators B.
In some modes of optical biosensor technology, a colorimetric resonant diffractive grating surface is used as a surface binding platform. A guided mode resonant phenomenon is used to produce an optical structure that, when illuminated with white light, is designed to reflect only a single wavelength. When molecules are attached to the surface, the reflected wavelength (color) is shifted due to the change of the optical path of light that is coupled into the grating. By linking receptor molecules to the grating surface, complementary binding molecules can be detected without the use of any kind of fluorescent probe or particle label. High throughput screening of pharmaceutical compound libraries with protein targets, and microarray screening of protein-protein interactions for proteomics are examples of applications that can be amenable to this approach.
In some embodiments, the invention is used to prepare an analyte for detection by acoustic detection technology such as that being commercialized by Akubio Ltd. (Cambridge, UK). Various modes of this type of label-free detection are described in the following references: M. A. Cooper, “Label-free screening of molecular interactions using acoustic detection,” Drug Discovery Today 2002, 6 (12) Suppl.; M. A. Cooper “Acoustic detection of pathogens using rupture event scanning (REVS),” Directions in Science, 2002, 1, 1-2; and M. A. Cooper, F. N. Dultsev, A. Minson, C. Abell, P. Ostanin and D. Klenerman, “Direct and sensitive detection of a human virus by rupture event scanning,” Nature Biotech., 2001, 19, 833-837.
In some embodiments the invention is used to prepare an analyte for detection by atomic force microscopy, scanning force microscopy and/or nanoarray technology such as that being commercialized by BioForce Nanosciences Inc. (Ames, Iowa). See, for example, Limansky, A., Shlyakhtenko, L. S., Schaus, S., Henderson, E. and Lyubchenko, Y. L. (2002) Amino Modified Probes for Atomic Force Microscopy, Probe Microscopy 2(3-4) 227-234; Kang, S-G., Henderson, E. (2002) Identification of Non-telomeric G-4 binding proteins in human, E. coli, yeast and Arabidopsis. Molecules and Cells 14(3), 404-410; Clark, M. W., Henderson, E., Henderson, W., Kristmundsdottir, A., Lynch, M., Mosher, C. and Nettikadan, S., (2001) Nanotechnology Tools for Functional Proteomics Analysis, J. Am. Biotech. Lab; Kang, S-G., Lee, E., Schaus, S. and Henderson, E. (2001) Monitoring transfected cells without selection agents by using the dual-cassette expression EGFP vectors. Exp. Molec. Med. 33(3) 174-178; Lu, Q. and E. Henderson (2000) Two Tetrahymena G-DNA binding proteins, TGP I and TGP 3, have novel motifs and may play a role in micromiclear division. Nuc. Acids Res. 28(15); Mosher, C., Lynch, M., Nettikadan, S., Henderson, W., Kristmundsdottir, A., Clark, M. C. and Henderson, E., (2000) NanoA.rrays, The Next Generation Molecular Array Format for High Throughput Proteomics, Diagnostics and Drug Discovery JALA, 5(5) 75-78; O'Brien, J. C., Vivian W. Jones, and Marc D. Porter, Curtis L. Mosher and Eric Henderson, (2000) Immunosensing Platforms Using Spontaneously Adsorbed Antibody Fragments on Gold. Analytical Chemistry, 72(4), 703-710; Tseng, H. C., Lu, Q., Henderson, E., and Graves, D. J., (I 999) Rescue of phosphorylated Tau-mediated microtubule formation by a natural osinolyte TMAO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA 1999 Aug. 17; 96(17):9503-8; Lynch, M. and Henderson, E. (1999) A reliable preparation method for imaging DNA by AFM. Microscopy Today, 99-9, 10; Mazzola, L. T., Frank, C. W., Fodor, S. P. A., Lu, Q., Mosher, C., Lartius, R. and Henderson, E. (1999) Discrimination of DNA hybridization using chemical force microscopy. Biophys. J., 76, 2922-2933; Jones, V. W., Kenseth, J. R., Porter, M. D., Mosher, C. L. and Henderson, E. (1998) Microminiaturized immunoassays using Atomic Force Microscopy and compositionally patterned antigen arrays. Anal. Chem., 70 (7), 123 3-124 1; Fritzsche, W. and Henderson, E. (1997) Ribosome substructure investigated by scanning force microscopy and image processing. J. Micros. 189, 50-56; Fritzsche, W. and Henderson, E. (1997) Mapping elasticity of rehydrated metaphase chromosomes by scanning force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 69 (1997), 191-200; Schaus, S. S. and Henderson, E. (1997) Cell viability and probe-cell membrane interactions of XR1 glial cells imaged by AFM. Biophysical Journal, 73, 1205-1214—W. Fritzsche, J. Symanzik, K. Sokolov, E. Henderson (1997) Methanol induced lateral diffusion of colloidal silver particles on a silanized glass surface—a scanning force microscopy study. Journal of Colloidal and Interface Science, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 185 (2), 466-472—Fritzsche, W and Henderson, E. (1997) Chicken erythrocyte nucleosomes have a defined orientation along the linker DNA—a scanning force microscopy study. Scanning 19, 42-47; W. Fritzsche, E. Henderson (1997) Scanning force microscopy reveals ellipsoid shape of chicken erythrocyte nucleosomes. Scanning 19, 42-47; Vesekna, J., Marsh, T., Miller, R., Henderson, E. (1996) Atomic force microscopy reconstruction of G-wire DNA. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14(2), 1413-1417; W. Fritzsche, L. Martin, D. Dobbs, D. Jondle, R. Miller, J. Vesenka, E. Henderson (1996) Reconstruction of Ribosomal Subunits and rDNA Chromatin Imaged by Scanning Force Microscopy. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B 14 (2), 1404-1409—Fritzsche, W. and Henderson, E. (1996) Volume determination of human metaphase chromosomes by scanning force microscopy. Scanning Microscopy 10(1); Fritzsche, W., Sokolov, K., Chumanov, G., Cottom, T. M. and Henderson, E. (1996) Ultrastructural characterization of colloidal metal films for bioanalytical applications by SFM. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 14 (3) (1996), 1766-1769; Fritzsche, W., Vesenka, J. and Henderson, E. (1995) Scanning force microscopy of chromatin. Scanning Microscopy. 9(3), 729-739; Vesenka, J., Mosher, C. Schaus, S. Ambrosio, L. and Henderson, E. (1995) Combining optical and atomic force microscopy for life sciences research. BioTechniques, 19, 240-253; Jondle, D. M., Ambrosio, L., Vesenka, J. and Henderson, E. (1995) Imaging and manipulating chromosomes with the atomic force microscope. Chromosome Res. 3 (4), 239-244; Marsh, T. C., J. Vesenka, and E. Henderson. (1995) A new DNA nanostructure imaged by scanning probe microscopy. Nuc. Acids Res., 23(4), 696-700; Martin, L. D., J. P. Vesenka, E. R. Henderson, and D. L. Dobbs. (1995) Visualization of nucleosomal structure in native chromatin by atomic force microscopy. Biochemistry, 34, 4610-4616—Mosher, C., Jondle, D., Ambrosio, L., Vesenka, J. and Henderson, E. (1994) Microdissection and Measurement of Polytene Chromosomes Using the Atomic Force Microscope. Scanning Microscopy, 8(3) 491-497; Vesenka, J., R. Miller, and E. Henderson. (1994) Three-dimensional probe reconstruction for atomic force microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 65, 1-3—Vesenka, J., Manne, S., Giberson, R., Marsh, T. and Henderson, E. (1993) Colloidal gold particles as an incompressible atomic force microscope imaging standard for assessing the compressibility of biomolecules., Biophys. J., 65, 992-997; Vesenka, J., S. Manne, G. Yang, C. J. Bustamante and E. Henderson. (1993) Humidity effects on atomic force microscopy of gold-labeled DNA on mica. Scan. Mic. 7(3): 781-788; Rubim, J. C., Kim, J-H., Henderson, E. and Cotton, T. M. (1993) Surface enhanced raman scattering and atomic force microscopy of brass electrodes in sulfuric acid solution containing benzotriazole and chloride ion. Applied Spectroscopy 47(1), 80-84; Parpura, V., Haydon, P. G., Sakaguchi, D. S., Henderson, E. (1993) Atomic force microscopy and manipulation of living glial cells. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, I 1 (4), 773-775; Shaiu, W-L., Larson, D. D., Vesenka, J. Henderson, E. (1993) Atomic force microscopy of oriented linear DNA molecules labeled with 5 nm gold spheres. Nuc. Acids Res., 21 (1) 99-103; Henderson, E., Sakaguchi, D. S. (1993) Imaging F-Actin in fixed glial cells with a combined optical fluorescence/atomic force microscope. Neurohnage 1, 145-150; Parpura, V. Haydon, P. G. and Henderson, E. (1993) Three-dimensional imaging of neuronal growth cones and glia with the Atomic Force Microscope. J. Cell Sci. 104, 427-432; Henderson, E., Haydon, P. G and Sakaguchi, D. A. (1992) Actin filaments dynamics in living glial cells imaged by atomic force microscopy. Science, 25 7, 1944-1946; Henderson, E. (1992) Atomic force microscopy of conventional and unconventional nucleic acid Structures. J. Microscopy, 167, 77-84—Henderson, E. (1992) Nanodissection of supercoiled plasmid DNA by atomic force microscopy. Nucleic Acids Research, 20 (3) 445-447.
In some embodiments the invention is used to prepare an analyte for detection by a technology involving activity-based protein profiling such as that being commercialized by ActivX, Inc. (La Jolla, Calif.). Various modes of this methodology are described in the following references: Kidd et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40:4005-4015; Adam et al. (2000) Chemistry and Biiology 57:1-16; Liu et al. (1999) PNAS 96(26):146940-14699; Cravatt and Sorensen (2000) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4:663-668; Patricelli et al. (2001) Proteomics 1-1067-71.
In some embodiments the invention is used to prepare an analyte for analysis by a technology involving a kinetic exclusion assay, such as that being commercialized by Sapidyne Instruments Inc. (Boise, Id.). See, e.g., Glass, T. (1995) Biomedical Products 20(9): 122-23; and Ohumura et al. (2001) Analytical Chemistry 73 (14):3 3 92-99.
In some embodiments, the systems and methods of the invention are useful for preparing protein samples for crystallization, particularly for use in X-ray crystallography-based protein structure determination. The invention is particularly suited for preparation of samples for use in connection with high throughput protein crystallization methods. These methods typically require small volumes of relatively concentrated and pure protein, e.g., on the order of 1 μL, per crystallization condition tested. Instrumentation and reagents for performing high throughput crystallization are available, for example, from Hampton Research Corp. (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), RoboDesign International Inc. (Carlsbad, Calif.), Genomic Solutions, Inc. (Ann Arbor, Mich.) and Corning Life Sciences (Kennebunk, Me.). Typically, protein crystallization involves mixing the protein with a mother liquor to form a protein drop, and then monitoring the drop to see if suitable crystals form, e.g., the sitting drop or hanging drop methods. Since the determination of appropriate crystallization conditions is still largely empirical, normally a protein is tested for crystallization under a large number of different conditions, e.g., a number of different candidate mother liquors are used. The protein can be purified by extraction prior to mixture with mother liquor. The sample can be collected in an intermediate holding vessel, from which it is then transferred to a well and mixed with mother liquor. Alternatively, the protein drop can be dispensed directly from the column to a well. The invention is particularly suited for use in a high-throughput mode, where drops of protein sample are introduced into a number of wells, e.g., the wells of a multi-well plate (e.g., 94, 3 84 wells, etc.) such as a CrystalEX 384 plate from Corning (Corning Life Sciences, Kennebunk Me.). The protein drops and/or mother liquors can be dispensed into microwells using a high precision liquid dispensing system such as the Cartesian. Dispensing System Honeybee (Genomic Solutions, Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.). In high throughput modes it is desirable to automate the process of crystals trial analysis, using for example a high throughput crystal imager such as the RoboMicroscope III (RoboDesign International Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.).
Other analytical techniques particularly suited for use in conjunction with certain embodiments of the invention include surface immobilized assays, immunological assays, various ligand displacement/competition assays, direct genetic tests, biophysical methods, direct force measurements, NMR, electron microscopy (including cryo-EM), microcalorimetry, mass spectroscopy, IR and other methods such as those discussed in the context of binding detection chips, but which can also be used in non-chips contexts.
In one embodiment, an extracted sample is eluted in a deuterated desorption solvent (i.e., D20, chloroform-d, etc.) for direct analysis by NMR, e.g., an integrated microfluidic-NMR system. For example, a biomolecule analyte is extracted, washed with PBS or a similar reagent, washed with water as needed, and then liquid blown out. The column is then washed with D20, e.g., one or more small slugs of D20, so as to replace substantially all of the water in the extraction phase matrix with D20. The analyte is then eluted with a deuterated desorption solution, e.g., a buffer made up in D20. Deuterated solvents can be obtained, e.g., from Norell, Inc. (Landisville, N.J.).
In general, it is important to use a desorption solvent that is consistent with the requirements of the analytical method to be employed, e.g., in many cases it is preferable that the pH of the desorption solvent be around neutral, such as for use with some protein chips.
Maintaining Pipette Tip Columns and Polymer Beads in a Wet State
In certain embodiments, the invention provides methods of storing pipette tip columns in a wet state, i.e., with a “wet bed” of extraction medium. This is useful in it allows for preparing the columns and then storing for extended periods prior to actual usage without the bed drying out, particularly where the extraction medium is based on a resin, such as a gel resin. For example, it allows for the preparation of wet columns that can be packaged and shipped to the end user, and it allows the end user to store the columns for a period of time before usage. In many cases, if the bed were allowed to dry out it would adversely affect column function, or would require a time-consuming extra step of re-hydrating the column prior to use.
The maintenance of a wet state can be particularly critical wherein the bed volume of the packed bed is small, e.g., in a range having a lower limit of 0.1 μL, 1 μL, 5 μL, 10 μL, or 20 μL, and an upper limit of 5 μL, 10 μL, 20 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, 200 μL, 300 μL, 500 μL, 1 mL, 2 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL, 20 mL, or 50 mL. Typical ranges would include 0.1 to 100 μL, 1 to 100 μL, 5 to μL, 10 to 100 μL, 1 to 20 μL, 1 to 10 μL, 5 to 20 μL, and 5 to 10 μL.
The wet tip results from producing a tip having a packed bed of medium wherein a substantial amount of the interstitial space is occupied by a liquid. Substantial wetting would include beds wherein at least 25% of the interstitial space is occupied by liquid, and preferably at least 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, or substantially the entire interstitial space is occupied by liquid. The liquid can be any liquid that is compatible with the medium, i.e., it should not degrade or otherwise harm the medium or adversely impact the packing. Preferably, it is compatible with purification and/or extraction processes intended to be implemented with the column. For example, trace amounts of the liquid or components of the liquid should not interfere with solid phase extraction chemistry if the column is intended for use in a solid phase extraction. Examples of suitable liquids include water, various aqueous solutions and buffers, and various polar and non-polar solvents described herein. The liquid might be present at the time the column is packed, e.g., a solvent in which the extraction medium is made into a slurry, or it can be introduced into the bed subsequent to packing of the bed.
In certain embodiments, the liquid is a solvent that is water miscible and that is relatively non-volatile and/or has a relatively high boiling point (and preferably has a relatively high viscosity relative to water). A “relatively high boiling point” is generally a boiling point greater than 100° C., and in some embodiments of the invention is a boiling point at room temperature in range having a lower limit of 100° C., 110° C., 120° C., 130° C., 140° C., 150° C., 160° C., 170° C., 180° C., 190° C., 200° C., or higher, and an upper limit of 150° C., 160° C., 170° C., 180° C., 190° C., 200° C., 220° C., 250° C., 300° C., or even higher. Illustrative examples would include alcohol hydrocarbons with a boiling point greater than 100° C., such as diols, triols, and polyethylene glycols (PEGs) of n=2 to n=150 (PEG-2 to PEG-150), PEG-2 to PEG-20, 1,3-butanediol and other glycols, particularly glycerol and ethylene glycol. The water miscible solvent typically constitutes a substantial component of the total liquid in the column, wherein “a substantial component” refers to at least 5%, and preferably at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, or substantially the entire extent of the liquid in the column.
An advantage of these non-volatile solvents is that they are much less prone to evaporate than the typical aqueous solutions and solvents used in extraction processes. Thus, they will maintain the bed in a wet state for much longer than more volatile solvents. For example, an interstitial space filled with glycerol will in many cases stay wet for days without taking any additional measures to maintain wetness, while the same space filled with water would soon dry out. These solvents are particularly suitable for shipping and storage of gel type resin columns having agarose or sepharose beds. Other advantageous properties of many of these solvents, is that they are viscous so it is not easily displaced from column from shipping vibrations and movements, they are bacterial resistant, they do not appreciably penetrate or solvate agarose, sepharose, and other types of packing materials, and they stabilize proteins. Glycerol in particular is a solvent displaying these characteristics. Note that any of these solvents can be used neat or in combination with water or another solvent, e.g., pure glycerol can be used, or a mixture of glycerol and water or buffer, such as 50% glycerol or 75% glycerol.
One advantage of glycerol is that its presence in small quantities has negligible effects on many solid-phase extraction process. A tip column can be stored in glycerol to prevent drying, and then used in an extraction process without the need for an extra step of expelling the glycerol. Instead, a sample solution (typically a volume much greater than the bed volume, and hence much greater than the volume of glycerol) is loaded directly on the column by drawing it up through the bed and into the head space as described elsewhere herein. The glycerol is diluted by the large excess of sample solution, and then expelled from the column along with other unwanted contaminants during the loading and wash steps.
Note that relatively viscous, non-volatile solvents of the type described above, particularly glycerol and the like, are generally useful for storing polymer beads, especially the resin beads as described herein, e.g., agarose and sepharose beads and the like. Other examples of suitable beads would include xMAP® technology-based microspheres (Luminex, Inc., Austin, Tex.). Storage of polymer beads as a suspension in a solution comprising one or more of these solvents can be advantageous for a number of reasons, such as preventing the beads from drying out, reducing the tendency of the beads to aggregate, and inhibiting microbial growth. The solution can be neat solvent, e.g., 100% glycerol, or a mixture, such as an aqueous solution comprising some percentage of glycerol. The solution can also maintain the functionality of the resin bead by maintaining proper hydration, and protecting any affinity binding groups attached to the bead, particularly relatively fragile functional groups, such as certain biomolecules, e.g., proteins.
This method of storing suspensions of polymer beads is particularly valuable for storing small volume suspensions, e.g., volumes falling with ranges having lower limits of 0.1 μL, 0.5 μL, 1 μL, 5 μL, 10 μL, 20 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, 250 μL, 500 μL, or 1000 μL, and upper limits of 1 μL, 5 μL, 10 μL, 20 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, 250 μL, 500 μL, 1 mL, 5 mL 10 mL, 20 mL, or 50 mL. Typical, exemplary ranges would include 0.1 to 100 μL, 0.5 to 100 μL, 1 to 100 μL, 5 to 100 μL, 0.1 to 50 μL, 0.5 to 50 μL, 1 to 50 μL, 5 to 50 μL, 0.1 to 20 μL, 0.5 to 20 μL, 1 to 20 μL, 5 to 20 μL, 0.1 to 10 μL, 0.5 to 10 μL, 1 to 10 μL, 0.1 to 5 μL, 0.5 to 5 μL, 1 to 5 μL, and 0.1 to 1 μL.
Factors that can affect the rate at which a column dries include the ambient temperature, the air pressure, and the humidity. Normally columns are stored and shipped at atmospheric pressure, so this is usually not a factor that can be adjusted. However, it is advisable to store the columns at lower temperatures and higher humidity in order to slow the drying process. Typically the columns are stored under room temperature conditions. Room temperature is normally about 25° C., e.g., between about 20° C. and 30° C. In some cases it is preferable to store the pipette tip columns at a relatively low temperature, e.g., between about 0° C. and 30° C., between 0° C. and 25° C., between 0° C. and 20° C., between 0° C. and 15° C., between 0° C. and 10° C., or between 0° C. and 4° C. In many cases tips of the invention may be stored at even lower temperatures, particularly if the tip is packed with a liquid having a lower freezing point than water, e.g., glycerol.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a pipette tip column that comprises a bed of medium, the interstitial space of which has been substantially full of liquid for at least 24 hours, for at least 48 hours, for at least 5 days, for at least 30 days, for at least 60 days, for at least 90 days, for at least 6 months, or for at least one year. “Substantially full of liquid” refers to at least 25%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, or substantially the entire interstitial space being occupied by liquid, without any additional liquid being added to the column over the entire period of time. For example, this would include a column that has been packaged and shipped and stored for a substantial amount of time after production.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a packaged pipette tip column packaged in a container the is substantially full of liquid, wherein the container maintains the liquid in the pipette tip to the extent that less than of 10% of the liquid is (or will be) lost when the tip is stored under these conditions for at least 24 hours, for at least 48 hours, for at least 5 days, for at least 30 days, for at least 60 days, for at least 90 days, for at least 6 months, or for at least one year.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a pipette tip column that comprises a bed of medium, the interstitial space of which is substantially full of liquid, wherein the liquid is escaping (e.g., by evaporation or draining) at a rate such that less than 10% of the liquid will be lost when the column is stored at room temperature for 24 hours, 48 hours, 5 days, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, six months or even one year.
In many cases, the wet pipette tip columns described above (e.g., the column that has been wet for an extended period of time and/or the column that is losing liquid only at a very slow rate) is packaged, e.g., in a pipette tip rack. The rack is a convenient means for dispensing the pipette tip columns, and for shipping and storing them as well. Any of a variety of formats can be used; racks holding 96 tips are common and can be used in conjunction with multi-well plates, multi-channel pipettors, and robotic liquid handling systems.
In various embodiments, the invention provides methods for maintaining the wetness of pipette tip columns. One method is illustrated in
In some embodiments, the pipette tip column is capped at the lower end 344 and/or the upper end 352. This capping serves to restrict evaporation (i.e., desiccation) of liquid from the bed and to thus maintain column wetness. The cap can be any solid substrate that covers the end and fully or partially seals. Examples would be caps formed to fit the end, such as plastic or rubber caps. The cap could be a film or sheet, such as a film made of metal, plastic, polymeric material or the like. A film or sheet is particularly suited to capping multiple caps. For example, a plurality of tips in a tip rack can all be capped at their upper ends with a sheet of foil or plastic film that is laid over and in contact with the tip tops. The cap can be attached to the opening by pressure, or by some adhesive, or any means that will result in a full or partial seal sufficient to inhibit evaporation of liquid from column. For example, a single sheet of foil or plastic can be glued to the top of a plurality of tips arranged in a rack. Preferably the adhesive is one that can does not bind too tightly (i.e., the cap is removably adhered to the column), so that the tips can be uncapped prior to use, and such that the adhesive does not leave a residue on the tip that would interfere with an extraction process. Alternatively, a sheet can be held in contact with the upper ends of the tips by pressure. For example, a sealing sheet can be draped over the upper ends of tips in a rack and a hard cover placed on top of that and in contact with the sheet, thus pressing the sheet against the tops of the tips to form a full or partial seal.
End capping is particularly effective when used in combination with storage liquid in the head space, as described above. The capping of one or both ends restricts the loss of storage liquid, and the storage liquid maintains the wetness of the bed for extended periods of time.
Another method of maintaining column wetness is by packing the tip column in the presence of an antidessicant. An “antidessicant” is any material that is able to moisturize or humidify an environment. One useful antidessicant is hydrated polyacrylamide. For example, an enclosed pipette tip container (a tip rack) can be used for tip storage, wherein the antidessicant is placed in the container and provides a moist environment that resists desiccation of tip columns in the container. In some embodiments, the cap itself comprises an antidessicant. For example, in one embodiment, a porous bag containing hydrated polyacrylamide is used as the cap. The bag caps the tip columns by being pressed against the open upper or lower ends of the tips. Thus, the bag not only inhibits loss of liquid from the column by sealing off the head space and/or bed from the external environment, it also provide a very moist environment.
Positioning Tips for Use in Multiplexed Processes
In some embodiments methods of the invention involve multiplexed extraction by means of a plurality of pipette tip columns and a multi-channel pipettor. The methods can involve drawing liquid from a well in a multi-well plate. The volume of liquid can be relatively small, e.g., on the order of 10 μL or less of desorption solution, and it is often important that substantially the entire volume of liquid is taken up by each of the tips. To achieve this, it is critical that the open lower end of each pipette tip column is accurately placed at a position in each well that is in contact with the fluid and submerged at a depth such that substantially all of the liquid will be drawn into the tip upon application of sufficient negative pressure in the head space. Typically this position is near the center of a circular well, at a depth that is near the bottom of the well (within one to several millimeters) but preferably not in direct contact with the bottom. If the tip makes direct contact with the well surface there is the danger that a seal might form between tip and well that will restrict flow of liquid into and/or out of the tip. However, contact between the tip and well bottom will not necessarily prevent or restrict flow into the tip, particularly if no seal is formed between the tip and well.
A problem that can arise in a multiplexed purification process is that it can be difficult to accurately position all of the tips on a multichannel pipettor such that each is at the optimal position in its corresponding well. For example, if the open lower ends of each tip are not positioned in substantially a straight line (for a linear configuration of tips) or a plane (for at two-dimensional array of tips), and that line (or plane) is not substantially parallel to the bottoms of the corresponding array of wells in a plate, then it will be very difficult to simultaneously position each tip at its optimal location. This is illustrated in
Thus, in one embodiment the invention provides a method for accurately positioning a plurality of tip columns into the wells of a microwell plate. The method as applied to a linear configuration of pipette tip columns is exemplified in
Note that as depicted in
Alternatively, more than two positioning tips could be used, although normally two is sufficient for a linear arrangement of pipette tips. However, if the row of tips is significantly longer than eight tips in length, then it might be the case that the additional stability provided by more than two positioning tips is beneficial.
Note that whether one or more tips are used, it is not necessary that the positioning tips take any particular position relative to the tip columns. For example, the arrangement of
The positioning tips will make contact with a reference point that is located at a fixed, predetermined location relative to the well bottoms corresponding to pipette tip columns. For example, the reference point can be a well bottom not being used in an extraction process. For example,
The method is also suitable for use with a two-dimensional array of tips, such as on a multi-channel pipettor having more than one row of tip columns, e.g., a 96 channel pipettor that is part of a robotic fluid handling system. For example,
Thus, in certain embodiments the invention provides a general method of positioning a pipette tip column in relative to a well bottom comprising the steps of: (a) providing a pipetting system comprising: (i) a pipettor; (ii) a pipette tip column having an open upper end operatively engaged with said pipettor and an open lower end for passing solution through the pipette tip column; and (iii) a positioning tip attached to said pipettor, said positioning tip having a proximal end attached to the pipettor and a distal end positioned at a fixed., predetermined location relative to the open lower end of the pipette tip column; and (b) positioning the pipetting system so that: (i) the distal end of the positioning tip makes contact with a reference point, wherein said reference point is located at a fixed, predetermined location relative to a well having a well bottom; and (ii) the open lower end of the pipette tip column is positioned over the well bottom.
The pipetting system can be part of a robotic liquid handling system.
In certain embodiments the well contains a liquid, e.g., a sample, wash or desorption solution. In certain embodiments the pipetting system is positioned so that the open lower end of the pipette tip column makes contact with the liquid, and the pipettor is activated to draw liquid through the open lower end and into the pipette tip column.
In certain embodiments the pipettor is a multi-channel pipettor.
Particularly in cases where the pipettor is a multi-channel pipettor, the pipetting system can comprise a plurality of pipette tip columns, each pipette tip column having an open upper end operatively engaged with said pipettor and an open lower end for passing solution through the pipette tip column, wherein the pipetting system is positioned so that: (i) the distal end of the positioning tip makes contact with a reference point, wherein said reference point is located at a fixed, predetermined location relative to a well having a well bottom; and (ii) the open lower end of each of the pipette tip column is positioned over a well bottom of one of the plurality of wells.
In certain embodiments positioning tip is a pipette tip, a pipette tip column, or some other object capable of attachment to the pipettor. The attachment can be transient, or the positioning tip can be permanently affixed to the pipettor or even an integral component of the pipettor.
In certain embodiments the wells are all elements of a multi-well plate e.g., microwells.
In certain embodiments of the invention involving a multi-well plate, the reference point can be located on the multi-well plate, e.g., the reference point can be the bottom of a well of the multi-well plate.
In certain embodiments, a plurality of positioning tips is used, each positioning tip making contact with a reference point located at a fixed, predetermined location relative to the plurality of wells.
In certain embodiments, the volume of liquid in the wells is relatively low, e.g., in a range having a lower limit of 0.1 mL, 0.5 μL, 1 μL, 2 μL, 5 μL or 10 μL, and an upper limit of 1 μL, 2 μL, 5 μL 10 μL, 20 μL, 30 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, 200 μL or even 500 μL. For example, in certain embodiments the volume of liquid in the wells is of between 1 and 100 μL, or 1 and 20 μL, or 5 and 20 μL.
In certain embodiments, the open lower end of the pipette tip column is positioned close enough to the well bottom such that upon activation of the pipettor substantially all of the liquid is drawn through the open lower end and into the pipette tip column, but not so close as to form a seal with the well bottom.
The open lower end of the pipette tip column is typically positioned relatively close to the corresponding well bottom, e.g., within a range having a lower limit of about 0.05 mm, 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.4 m, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, or 5 mm from the bottom of the well, and an upper limit of 0.3 mm, 0.4 m, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, 7 mm, 8 mm, 8 mm or 10 mm of the well bottom. For example, in some embodiments the open lower end of a pipette tip column is positioned with between 0.05 and 2 mm from a well bottom, or between 0.1 and 1 mm from a well bottom. The term “well bottom” does not necessarily refer to the absolute bottom of a well, but to the point where the tip makes contact with the well when the tip is lowered to its full extent into the well, i.e., a point where the tip can seal with the well surface. For example, in some microwell plate formats the wells taper down to an inverted conical shape, so a typical tip column will not be able to make contact with the absolute bottom of the well.
In certain embodiments, the positioning tips are longer than the pipette tip columns. The difference in length between positioning tips and pipette tip columns can result in accurately locating the ends of the pipette tip columns at a desired distance from the bottoms of the corresponding wells. The difference in length between positioning tips and pipette tip columns can be relatively small, e.g. in a range having a lower limit of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm or 2 mm and an upper limit of 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm 6 mm, 7 mm, 8 mm, 8 mm or 10 mm. For example, in certain embodiments the positioning tips are between 1 and 10 mm longer than the pipette tip columns.
In certain embodiments, a plurality of pipette tip columns and positioning tips are attached to a multi-channel pipettor in a linear configuration. For example, the positioning tips can be positioned at the two ends of the linear configuration of pipette tip columns and positioning tips, e.g., see
In certain embodiments, a plurality of pipette tip columns and positioning tips are attached to a multi-channel pipettor in a two-dimensional array. The two-dimensional array can comprise four corners, with positioning tips are positioned at two or more of the corners. For example, the positioning tips can be positioned at four corners of a two-dimensional array, e.g., see
Integrated Sample Preparation Devices
In some embodiments, the invention provides an integrated sample preparation device for processing a plurality of fluid samples. The device comprises a plurality of sample processing chambers connected in parallel, each chamber having an internal surface and inlet and outlet ports. Disposed within each sample processing chamber is a media chamber, the media chamber comprising a bottom frit attached to and extending across the sample processing chamber; and a top barrier attached to and extending across the sample processing chamber between the bottom frit and the inlet port, wherein the top barrier, bottom frit and internal surface define a media chamber having a first average cross-sectional area. Positioned within each media chamber is a bed of separation medium, e.g., an extraction medium.
In some embodiments of the invention, each sample processing chamber comprises a sample well section having a second average cross-sectional area; and a column section in communication with the sample well section, wherein the column section contains the media chamber and is positioned between the outlet port and the sample well section.
An example of the foregoing embodiment is illustrated in
In some embodiments, the first average cross-sectional area is substantially less than the second average cross-sectional area. See, for example, the microplate embodiment of
In certain embodiments, the first average cross-sectional area is relatively small, e.g., less than about 100 mm2, or less than 50, 20, 10, 5 or 2 mm2. In certain embodiments the bed of separation medium is characterized by a low back pressure, e.g., in the range having a lower limit of at most 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 or 1 psi, and an upper limit of about 0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10 or 20 psi, when an aqueous solution is run through the bed at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. For example, a back pressure in the range of about 0.01 psi to 1 psi when an aqueous solution is run through the bed at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.
Integrated sample preparation devices of the invention can incorporate any of the desirable features described throughout this disclosure, including, but not limited too, low pore volume frits, thin frits, membrane screen frits, low bed volumes, and low back pressure frits and beds. The separation medium can be of a variety of types, including gel resin beads, soft gel resin beads, agarose or sepharose beads. In certain embodiments the separation medium is an extraction medium, often times including affinity binding groups.
In certain embodiments, the plurality of sample processing chambers are elements of a first microplate. Certain devices of the invention comprise a second microplate having a plurality of wells, the second microplate positioned so that the plurality of wells line up with the outlet ports of the first microplate. With this configuration, a sample processed in the bed of separation medium can be eluted and collected in the corresponding well of the second microplate.
In certain embodiments, the device comprises a means for driving a liquid solution through the bed of separation medium. For example, the means for driving a liquid solution through the bed of separation medium can involve generating differential pressure between the inlet and outlet ports. The means for passing liquid through the bed of separation medium can be, but is not limited to, pressure generated by pumping, vacuum (or suction), gravity, and centrifugation.
One approach to passing liquid back and forth through the separation bed (bidirectional flow) is to operatively attach a pipettor (such as a multi-channel pipettor) to the inlet port of sample processing chamber, to insert the outlet port into a liquid to be passed through the bed (for example, in a well of another microplate), and to use the pipettor to aspirate and discharge the liquid (e.g., an elution buffer) back and forth through the bed. An adapter can be used to form an operative, sealing engagement between the pipettor and the well outlet port. In this embodiment, each separation chamber functions in much the same way as a pipette tip column, as described in US Patent Application Publication Nos. US2004/0072375 and USS2005/0019951. In some embodiments, a combination of such bidirectional pumping and liquid passage by other means (such as vacuum, gravity or centrifugation) are used in a single purification process.
In certain embodiments, the top barrier is not a frit, but rather a barrier that is removed from the device prior using the device. This barrier can be used to contain the separation medium in the separation bed, and to maintain the medium in a functional condition during storage and shipment of the device. For example, it is advantageous to be able to store and ship a microwell filter plate containing hydrated gel resin beads in the wells. In conventional separation devices the gel resin beads will tend to dry out. However, by using the top barrier of this invention, it is possible to contain the beads in a controlled environment that prevents drying out for a prolonged period. The device can be shipped and stored, and then just prior to use the barrier is removed, allowing sample to be introduced into the well for purification, e.g., by conventional techniques involving filter plates and gel resin separation beads, such as Ni-NTA. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/920,922 describes a number of materials suitable for use in capping or sealing separation columns to prevent desiccation of the medium, including sheets, films, caps, and the like. These include the use of antidessicants, such as hydrated polyacrylamide, and sheets of polymeric material.
When shipping and storing a device containing hydrated gel resin beads, it is further desirable to suspend the beads in a solvent that maintains the hydration of the beads. For example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/920,922 describes a number of solvents suitable for this purpose, including water miscible solvents having a boiling point greater than 100° C., 150° C., 200° C., or higher. The water miscible solvent can be used alone or in combination with other water miscible solvents, or water. Glycerol and ethylene glycol are particularly useful solvents in this regard.
In preparing sample preparation devices of this type, it is advantageous to deposit a predetermined amount of resin into each well, for more reproducible results from chamber to chamber (e.g., from well to well on separation microplate). It is also advantageous that the device be made in such a manner that it is compatible with a robotic system for directing automated sample preparation processes using the devices of the invention. Another advantage is that the devices can be sterilized, and then shipped and stored in a manner that retains this sterility. The invention can be adapted to any of a variety of microplate formats, including 96, 384 and 1536 well formats.
The invention further provides method for purifying an analyte from a sample solution comprising the steps of:
i) introducing a sample solution containing an analyte into the bed of separation medium of a sample processing chamber of an integrated sample preparation device of the invention, wherein the separation medium has an affinity for the analyte, whereby at least some fraction of the analyte is adsorbed to the separation medium;
ii) substantially evacuating the sample solution from the bed of separation medium, leaving the adsorbed analyte bound to the separation medium;
iii) introducing a desorption solvent into the bed of separation medium, whereby at least some fraction of the bound analyte is desorbed from the separation medium into the desorption solvent; and
iv) eluting the desorption solvent containing the desorbed analyte from the bed of separation medium.
In some embodiments of this method, between steps (ii) and (iii) the separation medium is washed.
In general, methods employing the integrated sample preparation devices involve passage of one or more liquids through the bed of separation medium. These liquids are typically aqueous solutions, such as sample solutions, wash and desorption solvents. The sample processing chambers function analogously to pipette tip columns described in US Patent Application Publication Nos. US2004/0072375 and USS20050019951, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,707, with the portion of the sample chamber above the top frit acting as a reservoir wherein liquid can reside prior to or subsequent to its passage through the bed. For example, in some embodiments, a liquid is aspirated and discharged through the outlet port, similar to the aspiration and discharge of a liquid through the bed of a pipette tip column. To the extent that the volume of liquid is larger than the capacity of the bed, the area above the top frit acts as reservoir to hold the excess liquid. This sort of liquid movement can be accomplished, for example, by means of a pump. The liquid can be, for example, a sample solution, wash or desorption solvent.
In other embodiments, liquid is introduced through the inlet port and discharged through the outlet port, similar to the normal operation of filtration microplates. Certain embodiments of the invention involve methods wherein certain liquids are aspirated and discharged through the outlet port, while other are introduced through the inlet port and discharged through the outlet port. For example, in some embodiments, sample solutions and wash solutions are introduced through the inlet port and exit the outlet port, which result in a single unidirectional flow through the separation bed. To achieve multiple passages in this mode, the solution would be reintroduced through the inlet port and re-passaged through the bed of separation medium. The desorption solution, on the other hand, can be aspirated and discharged through the outlet port, which results in multiple, bidirectional passage of fluid through the separation bed. The aspiration and discharge steps can be repeated multiple times, to achieve multiple passages of solution through the bed, which in some contexts can be advantageous. This sort of bidirectional, multi-passage is described in more detail in US Patent Application Publication Nos. US2004/0072375 and USS20050019951.
In certain embodiments, the volume of desorption solution introduced into the sample processing chamber is relatively small relative to the interstitial volume of the bed of separation medium, e.g., less than 10-fold greater the interstitial volume of the bed of separation, less than 2-fold greater the interstitial volume of the bed of separation medium, or even smaller.
In certain embodiments, the analyte is a biological macromolecule, such as a protein, peptide, polysaccharide, lipid, or polynucleotide.
Devices of the invention can be used to achieve high enrichment factors, e.g., at least 10, 100, 1000, 10,000, or more.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Having now generally described the invention, the same will be more readily understood through reference to the following examples, which are provided by way of illustration, and are not intended to be limiting of the present invention, unless so specified.
The following preparations and examples are given to enable those skilled in the art to more clearly understand and practice the present invention. They should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, but merely as being illustrative and representative thereof.
Construction of a 96-Well Microplate Separation Device
A 96 well filter plate having 800 μL wells, 0.7 μm glass fiber filters and long drip spouts was obtained from Innovative Microplate (Chicopee, Mass., Catalog No. F20008). The filter, filter support and spout were removed from a well, leaving a bottomless well. A PhyTip extraction tip column containing Protein A resin, which is basically a variant of a 1000 μL pipette tip containing a bed of extraction medium in the tip, was obtained from PhyNexus, Inc. (San Jose, Calif., Catalog No. PTR 41-10-01). The tip column was inserted into the bottomless well, so that the lowered tapered end protruded from the bottom of the well, the middle section of the tip formed a friction fit with the internal surface of the well, and the upper wide bore section of the tip protruded out of the top of the plate. The section protruding out of the top was cut off with a razor blade, resulting in an embodiment of the separation device of the invention.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover and variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention that follow, in general, the principles of the invention, including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth. Moreover, the fact that certain aspects of the invention are pointed out as preferred embodiments is not intended to in any way limit the invention to such preferred embodiments.
This application claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/658,705 filed Mar. 3, 2005, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/733,534, filed Dec. 10, 2003; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/434,713, filed May 8, 2003; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/620,155, file Jul. 14, 2003; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/920,922, filed Aug. 17, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,707, filed Nov. 30, 2005; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/921,010 filed Aug. 17, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60658705 | Mar 2005 | US |
