The present application claims the benefit of priority of German Application No. 102009045637.6, filed Oct. 13, 2009. The entire text of the priority application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The disclosure relates to a method and a device for screw capping vessels, in particular bottles, such as for beverage bottling operations.
As is well-known, screw caps of vessels, for example bottles, can be closed in rotary machines with several circumferentially arranged closing stations rotating about a common axle, the closing caps each being held in closing heads which are rotated as well as lowered corresponding to the thread pitch after having been placed onto the respective bottle mouth. As an alternative, the bottles can also be correspondingly lifted while the closing cap is being screwed on.
In this context, it is known from patent publication DE 10 2007 057 857 A1 to accomplish the lifting as well as rotation of a closing head during the closing of a vessel by means of a combined linear-rotatory drive.
It is furthermore known from patent publication DE 10 2007 047 742 A1 to measure the torque or the power consumption of a motor for rotating the closure, in particular when a pilfer-proof band provided at the closure is applied, to be able to separately adjust and check the maximum torque when the pilfer-proof band is applied and when the closure is finally tightened.
However, there still is a demand to close vessels with a lower error rate as well as to be able to discharge possibly incorrectly closed vessels from a continuous product stream at a low error rate, in particular using a closing head with a linear-rotatory drive.
It is an aspect of the disclosure to provide a method for closing vessels improved in this respect and a corresponding device.
This aspect is achieved with a method in which the power consumption of the linear drive system of the closing head is measured in a pick phase for picking up the respective closing cap and/or in a screw phase for screwing on the closing cap, and is compared with at least one characteristic value of the power consumption to detect an imminent or already occurred incorrect closure. The power consumption of the linear drive system can be used as measure for the pressing force of the closing head and thus permit a direct conclusion about the contact between the closing head and the closing cap or the closing cap and the vessel mouth, respectively. Depending on the specification or selection of the characteristic value, individual phases of picking up and screwing on the closing cap can be selectively controlled. In this respect, a characteristic value is an individual value, such as a threshold value, or a flow of current, such as a positive or a negative peak load, which serves as reference value in a certain time section of the method to be able to decide whether the closing procedure is correct or incorrect. The term power consumption is representatively used for all electric variables that directly or indirectly correlate with the spent motor output, in particular as a measure for an applied pressing force of the closing head or the closing cap, respectively.
Preferably, the position of the closing head with respect to the linear axle of the linear drive system is moreover determined. Thereby, a position of the closing head can be associated to individual measured values of power consumption. Correspondingly, one can verify whether a current value at a certain position is admissible or not and thus improve the reliability of error detection. Equally, one can gather a possible change of the position of the closing head along the linear axle from a certain course of power consumption.
Preferably, the characteristic value is an upper threshold value of the power consumption in the pick phase. When the upper threshold value is exceeded, one can gather an inadmissibly high pressing force and thereby detect or decide whether or that the closing cap is deformed and/or not correctly screwed on. Thereby, an imminent incorrect closure can be determined or an incorrect closure can be avoided.
Preferably, the characteristic value is a lower threshold value of the power consumption in the pick phase. If the lower threshold value is fallen below, one can gather an inadmissibly low pressing force and detect or decide thereby whether or that the closing cap or a pilfer-proof band of the closing cap is missing. Thereby, an imminent incorrect closure can be detected or an incorrect closure can be avoided.
Preferably, the characteristic value is a characteristic peak of the power consumption in the pick phase, and it is verified whether the characteristic peak occurs in the pick phase. Overcoming a mechanical resistance when the closing cap engages in the closing head generates a momentary increase of power consumption. If the characteristic peak load occurs, one can therefore detect or decide whether or that the closing cap has been correctly picked up by the closing head. Thereby, one can say that a closing cap can be screwed on correctly with a particularly. high probability. In particular in combination with a comparison of the power consumption and the travel of the linear axle with at least one threshold value, the informative value of the verification can be additionally increased and quality assurance improved.
Preferably, the characteristic value is an upper threshold value of the power consumption in the screw phase. If the upper threshold value is exceeded, one can gather an increased mechanical resistance during screwing on, as it arises, for example, when a pilfer-proof band approaches the bottle mouth. One can thus detect or decide whether or that a pilfer-proof band has been correctly attached. Thereby, the quality of the closure can be ensured.
Preferably, the characteristic value is a characteristic peak of the power consumption in the screw phase in particular during rotation against the closing direction, and by means of the characteristic peak, a starting position of the closing head at the beginning of the thread formed by the closing cap and the vessel mouth is determined. Thereby, a reference value for an absolute position determination of the bottle mouth can be detected. Such a determination is largely independent of tolerances of individual closing stations and therefore particularly precise.
Preferably, by means of the starting position at the begin of the thread, a lower desired end position of the closing head is calculated, and the power consumption when the desired end position is reached is compared to a further characteristic value of power consumption. Thereby, the threaded joint can be checked at a defined end point of the screw phase. This permits a final check of the screw operation.
Preferably, the further characteristic value is a lower threshold value of the power consumption in the screw phase. If the lower threshold value is fallen below, one can detect or decide whether or that the closing cap is not correctly screwed on or the vessel mouth is missing. By this, incorrect closure can be detected.
Preferably, the vessels are fed as continuous product stream, and vessels detected to be incorrectly closed are discharged from the product stream. One can thereby ensure that only perfectly closed bottles are processed further.
The technical aspect is furthermore achieved with a device for screw capping vessels, where a measuring means for measuring the power consumption of the linear drive system as well as an evaluation means for comparing the power consumption measured during picking up and/or screwing on the closing cap with a characteristic value of the power consumption to detect an imminent incorrect closure or an incorrect closure are provided. With the measuring means, a measure for the pressing force of the closing head can be determined and one can thus directly gather the contact between the closing head and the closing cap or the closing cap and the vessel mouth.
A particularly advantageous embodiment furthermore comprises a monitoring means for determining the position of the closing head with respect to the linear axle. Thereby, a position of the closing head can be associated to individual measured values of power consumption. One can correspondingly verify whether a current value at a certain position is admissible or not and thus improve the reliability of error detection. Equally, one can gather a possible change of position of the closing head along the linear axle from a certain course of power consumption.
An advantageous embodiment furthermore comprises a discharge device for discharging incorrectly closed vessels. One can thereby ensure that only correctly closed vessels are processed further.
Preferably, the device according to the disclosure comprises a control device which can control the linear drive system and the rotatory drive system such that only closing caps for which no imminent incorrect closure has been detected are screwed on.
It is also possible to influence the speed of the axis of rotation during screwing on on the mouth by the power consumption of the linear axle, for example to adjust the system to changed pitches and/or heights of the mouth/closure. Here, it would be conceivable to set up a kind of self-learning system where only start and end angles and characteristic threshold values influence the system.
A preferred embodiment of the disclosure is represented in the drawing. In the drawings:
As one can see in
For the sake of simplicity, there are schematically indicated only for the right motor 5 electric supply lines with electric current meters 7 for measuring the electric currents IL and IR flowing through the drive systems L, R, as well as a monitoring device 9 for determining the position y of the closing head 3 with respect to the linear axle L′ of the motor 5. The monitoring device 9 could be, for example, a component of a servo drive system. The axis of rotation R′ is also indicated for the sake of good order, the systems L, R driving the closing head 3 via a common shaft.
In combination with a neck star 10 for holding the bottles 2 to be closed at their collars 2a, the closing heads 3 each form closing stations 11 over a certain angular machine range, as indicated in the right of
In the left of
The closing caps 4 are picked up and screwed on as described below, and the procedure is monitored by measuring the currents IL, IR and the linear position y of the closing head. Typical measured curves are represented in
Accordingly, the closing head 3 is first lowered to a position y0 just above the closing cap 4 for taking or picking up the closing cap 4. As is schematically represented in
An essentially constant current IL flows during a major part of the pick phase P1. However, the engagement of the closing cap 4 in the closing head 3, or the overcoming of a mechanical resistance in the centering and clamping device 3a, becomes noticeable by a momentary increase of the current IL in the form of a peak load S1. Typically, the peak load S1 is within a period TS1 which is preferably no longer than one fifth, in particular no longer than one tenth of the duration TP1 of the pick phase P1. The peak load S1 is typical of a correct engagement of the closing cap 4 and serves as characteristic comparative value which, when it occurs, expresses a normal behavior of the current IL. Thus, correct pick up of the closing cap 4 can be detected by means of the course of the current IL in the pick phase P1.
If the closing cap 4 is correctly picked up in the pick phase P1, the current IL remains within a certain measured value range at least except for the momentary fluctuation of current S1. Thus, an upper and a lower threshold value I1 and I2 can be defined, an error occurring if they are exceeded or fallen below. For example, a defective closing cap 4 with an asymmetrical cross-section can be pressed into the closing head 3 only with an increased mechanical resistance or not at all, whereby the current IL rises above the upper threshold value IL. However, if the closing cap 4 is missing, the current IL remains below the lower threshold value I2. The threshold values I1 and I2 are thus characteristic comparative values which express, if they are exceeded or fallen below, an abnormal behavior of the current IL. If required, frequency portions of the current signal IL separated by suited filtering can be compared with the characteristic values S1 and I1 or I2, respectively, to avoid incorrect interpretations. This is also true for the comparison with further characteristic values described below.
It can be even observed that the lower threshold value I2 is fallen below at least at the beginning of the pick phase P1 when a pilfer-proof band 4a is missing at the closing cap 4, as in this case the total height of the closing cap 4 is lower than with the pilfer-proof band 4a, and the closing head 3 touches the closing cap 4 later when it is lowered. The measurement of the current IL can here be compared with a simultaneous registration of the linear position y of the closing head 3 to increase the success probability and/or accuracy of error determination.
Thus, in the pick station 12 one can detect a damage or lack of the closing cap 4 by observing the current IL in the pick phase P1, and a subsequent incorrect closure in the closing station 11 can be avoided, for example, by not screwing a damaged closing cap 4 onto an associated bottle 2.
The placing, screwing on and tightening of the closing caps 4 in the closing station 11 is indicated by way of example in
Due to the lift, the bottle collar 2a is pressed onto the spikes of the neck star 10 in the process. Here, it is possible to rotate the closing cap 4 in the closing direction or against the closing direction at the beginning P2a of the screw-on phase P2, or not to rotate it, as indicated in
In
Rotation against the closing direction in section P2b is not absolutely necessary, but has the advantage that the closing cap 4 engages abruptly and directly after a relative upper maximum position y3 of the closing head has been reached. A peak load S2 is connected with this, in particular a temporary drop of the current IL due to the momentarily lower contact pressure during engagement. To detect the peak load S2, an associated time window TS2 (not represented) can be defined within the screw phase P2. The characteristic fluctuation of current S2 can be used to determine a defined upper starting position y3 for the subsequent section P2c in which the closing cap 4 is screwed on in the closing direction. A desired value for a lower end position y4 can be calculated in turn from the upper starting position y3 when the closing cap 4 is completely screwed on for checking the screw-on procedure.
In section P2c, the closing head 3 is continuously drawn downwards by the convolution. Therefore, the contact pressure of the closing head 3 and thus the current IL are in this phase lower than directly before the threads sliding one upon the other are threaded up or engaged. The current IL is the smaller the smaller the difference between the lift of the closing head 3 and the movement of the closing cap 4 along the linear axle L′ predetermined by the rotational speed about the axis of rotation R′ and the thread pitch is.
In section P2c, a characteristic peak load S3 in the current IL can additionally occur during the approach of the pilfer-proof band 4a via the so-called pilfer-proof ring (not represented) which is provided at the bottle mouth 2b for fixing the pilfer-proof band 4a. Correspondingly, a peak S3′ in the operating current IR of the rotatory drive system R can occur, where the power consumption IR of the rotatory drive system R is a measure for the torque or tightening torque of the closing head 3. Thus, the application of the pilfer-proof band 4a can also be monitored by recording the current IL or IR, respectively, where the peak loads S3 and S3′ represent characteristic comparative values, from which one can gather, if they are missing, an abnormal behavior of the current IL or IR, respectively, caused by a lack of or an incorrectly applied pilfer-proof band 4a. Conversely, if the peak load S3 or S3′ is detected, one can gather a correctly applied pilfer-proof band 4a.
In particular if a suited time window TS3 is specified in section P2c, one can also verify whether the current IL or IR, respectively, rises above a threshold value I3 or I3′. In this case, the threshold value I3 or I3′ is a characteristic comparative value, where one can gather, if it is exceeded or permanently fallen below, a correctly or incorrectly applied pilfer-proof band 4a.
The screw-on phase 92 ends with the complete screwing-on of the closing cap 4, essentially as soon as the lower desired end position y4 of the closing head 3 is reached. As a mechanical resistance must occur at the desired end position y4 if the closing cap 4 is correctly screwed on, the current IL at the end position y4 must not be below a characteristic threshold value I4. Thus, the threshold value I4 can be consulted as characteristic comparative value for the current IL, from which one can detect, if it is exceeded or fallen below in section 2c, a correct or an incorrect seat of the closing cap 4 or a closure of the bottle 2. In addition, here, too, the current IR can be compared to a corresponding threshold value (not represented).
Following the screw phase P2 is the tightening phase P3 in which the closure is tightened by a dosed rise of the current IR of the rotatory drive unit R in a known manner until a certain tightening torque is reached, where the current IL of the linear drive unit L remains adjusted such that a sufficient contact pressure of the closing head 3 is ensured.
Subsequently, the closing head 3 is removed from the closing cap 4 or the closed bottle 2, respectively. The closing head 3 drives to a discharge position where, when it is reached, a possibly not screwed-on closing cap 4 still stuck in the closing head 3 is removed from the closing head, and it is then driven again to a starting position with respect to the pick station 12.
The evaluation of the current measurements for error detection or the determination of correct picking and closing is performed in a (non-depicted) evaluation unit 15 by comparing the measured current IL or IR with at least one characteristic comparative value, where the above described threshold values and peak loads can be arbitrarily combined as characteristic comparative values. Error messages can be given by suited (non-depicted) output units 16, for example by means of acoustic and/or optical signals. It is also possible to selectively control the production on the basis of the current measurements by means of a (non-depicted) control unit 17 in case of a detected incorrect closure and/or a detected imminent incorrect closure.
For example, incorrectly closed bottles 2 can be selectively discharged from the product stream by a (non-depicted) discharge device 18 downstream of the closing device, e.g. a pusher, by activating the discharge device by signals emitted by the control unit. Thereby, altogether a higher production quality can be achieved.
The current measurement here offers a variable possibility of detecting as correct or incorrect the course of closing in various phases of progression with only little equipment.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 045 637 | Oct 2009 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5400564 | Humphries et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
6170232 | VandeGeijn | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6525498 | Zalkin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6679026 | Cirio | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6804929 | Kemnitz | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6874301 | Kitamoto | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6948297 | Kitamoto | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7024837 | Takebe et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7987652 | Corniani | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7992365 | Uebel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20010018820 | Kitamoto | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020116897 | Higashizaki et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030093972 | Bouraoui et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030154688 | Lang | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040139811 | Cirio | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040216430 | Mavin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050022479 | Kitamoto | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060162285 | Haynes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20090178370 | Uebel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090293437 | Schulz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120186194 | Schlieper | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130239522 | Melrose | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60107475 | Dec 2005 | DE |
102007047742 | Apr 2009 | DE |
102007057857 | Jun 2009 | DE |
0639529 | Feb 1995 | EP |
1132331 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1182165 | Feb 2002 | EP |
05065191 | Mar 1993 | JP |
2001-278386 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003-025266 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-081387 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004-131132 | Apr 2004 | JP |
WO-2007028509 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2009047172 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009068166 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
German Search Report for DE102009045637.6, dated May 18, 2010. |
Translation of Japanese Office Action issued by Japanese Action on Mar. 18, 2014 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. P2010-228648. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110083405 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |