Patent Application
20160089516
This disclosure relates to medical devices for percutaneous endovascular procedures and, more particularly, to techniques for transradial catheterization using radial artery access.
A growing number of interventional procedures may be performed percutaneously by using one or more catheters to access treatment areas in the patient's vasculature or other regions. Although many procedures typically gain access through the femoral artery, certain access related complications are associated with this entry point. For example, major bleeding complication, retroperitoneal bleeding, blood transfusion, pseudoaneursym, difficult to achieve hemostasis following the completion of the procedure, prolonged period of immobilization, are more likely to happen with transfemoral approach. Larger the entry hole in the femoral artery, more likely are the above-mentioned complications. Correspondingly, it may be desirable to catheterize other vessels to reduce or avoid such complications or catheterize the femoral artery with a smaller diameter entry hole.
One suitable technique for catheterization is to gain access through the radial artery located in the patient's wrist. Transradial catheterization offers a number of benefits compared to the femoral approach, including a reduction in bleeding complications and more rapid ambulation. However, certain challenges are associated catheterization of this small size vessel. For example, spasm, pain and/or discomfort may occur. Radial artery catheterization may also lead to iatrogenic radial artery occlusion. Still further, radial catheterization limits the overall diameter of the guide catheter being used may be limited to 6 French size in most patients, precluding the ability to perform some of the more complex coronary, peripheral endovascular and structural cardiac intervention procedures. The important predictors of radial artery spasm during transradial catheterization include a smaller size body mass index, smaller radial artery, and larger “sheath diameter to radial artery diameter index.” As will be appreciated, spasm may lead to pain, irritation and inflammation, reducing the success rate of transradial catheterization. Likewise, the most important predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization include the sex of the patient, as females typically exhibit relatively smaller vessel diameters, and the use of a 6 French (or larger) sheath. Therefore, all of these challenges result from the relatively smaller diameter of the radial artery and the corresponding increased potential for stretching, expanding or irritating the artery by inserting a device having an outer diameter larger than the inner diameter of the radial artery.
These challenges are exacerbated when a sheath is employed in the catheterization procedure. Since the guide catheter is delivered through the sheath, it necessarily must have a greater outside diameter. The outer diameter of a sheath is on average 0.60 millimeter larger than the corresponding size catheter. To address this situation, attempts have been made to develop sheathless systems. Some approaches nevertheless still require a radial sheath and thus are not true sheathless systems. Currently available sheathless systems are expensive and increase costs by requiring use of a new system with each guide catheter exchange. Currently available sheathless systems also require specific configurations of the guide catheter being used with the system, and correspondingly limit the choice of catheter size and shape, potentially preventing the operator from using a preferred guide catheter shape or design.
Accordingly there is a need for a device and method for transradial catheterization that allows the use of an increased diameter guide catheter by avoiding the necessity of deploying the guide catheter through a sheath. Further, it would be desirable to facilitate the exchange of guide catheters while providing sheathless access. Still further, it would be desirable to allow the use of any guide catheter of choice, such as of any size, shape and/or manufacturer. As will be described in the following materials, this disclosure satisfies these and other needs.
The present disclosure is directed to a dilator for gaining access to a vessel of a patient, comprising an elongated body with proximal and distal ends, a distal portion with a maximal outer diameter that extends from the distal end to a guidewire exit port, a proximal portion with a reduced profile that extends from the guidewire exit port to the proximal end and a lumen that extends between the distal end and the guidewire exit port. The reduced profile proximal portion may have a smaller cross sectional area than the maximal diameter distal portion. For example, the reduced profile proximal portion may have a cross sectional area at least 40% smaller than the maximal diameter distal portion. The cross sectional area may further be at least 50% smaller than the maximal diameter distal portion.
In one aspect, the reduced profile proximal portion may have a semi-cylindrical configuration and the maximal diameter distal portion may have a cylindrical configuration.
The disclosure also includes a kit for gaining access to a vessel of a patient. The kit may include a first dilator having an elongated body with proximal and distal ends, a distal portion with a maximal outer diameter that extends from the distal end to a guidewire exit port, a proximal portion with a reduced profile that extends from the guidewire exit port to the proximal end and a lumen that extends between the distal end and the guidewire exit port and a second dilator having an elongated body with proximal and distal ends, a distal portion with a maximal outer diameter that extends from the distal end to a guidewire exit port, a proximal portion with a reduced profile that extends from the guidewire exit port to the proximal end and a lumen that extends between the distal end and the guidewire exit port.
In one aspect, the lumen of the first dilator may have a smaller inner diameter than the lumen of the second dilator. The maximal outer diameter distal portion of the first dilator may have an outer diameter the same as the maximal outer diameter distal portion of the second dilator. Alternatively, the maximal outer diameter distal portion of the first dilator may have an outer diameter smaller than the maximal outer diameter distal portion of the second dilator.
The disclosure also includes a method for gaining access to a vessel of a patient. The method may involve providing a first dilator having an elongated body with proximal and distal ends, a distal portion with a maximal outer diameter that extends from the distal end to a guidewire exit port, a proximal portion with a reduced profile that extends from the guidewire exit port to the proximal end and a lumen that extends between the distal end and the guidewire exit port, positioning a first guidewire within the vessel of the patient, advancing the first dilator over the first guidewire into the vessel without being inserted through a sheath, advancing a first guide catheter over the first dilator and removing the first dilator. The first dilator may be preloaded into the first guide catheter before advancing the first dilator.
In one aspect, the method may also involve introducing a second guidewire through the first guide catheter and positioning a distal end of the second guidewire at a desired region of within the patient, wherein the second guidewire has a larger diameter than the first guidewire. At least a portion of a procedure may be performed with the first guide catheter.
In one aspect, the method may also involve withdrawing the first guide catheter, providing a second dilator having an elongated body with proximal and distal ends, a distal portion with a maximal outer diameter that extends from the distal end to a guidewire exit port, a proximal portion with a reduced profile that extends from the guidewire exit port to the proximal end and a lumen that extends between the distal end and the guidewire exit port, advancing the second dilator over the second guidewire into the vessel without being inserted through a sheath, advancing a second guide catheter over the second dilator and removing the second dilator. The second dilator may be preloaded into the second guide catheter before advancing the first dilator.
In one aspect, the method may also involve performing at least a portion of the procedure with the second guide catheter.
In one aspect, the vessel may be a radial artery.
Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following and more particular description of the preferred embodiments of the disclosure, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and in which like referenced characters generally refer to the same parts or elements throughout the views, and in which:
At the outset, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to particularly exemplified materials, architectures, routines, methods or structures as such may vary. Thus, although a number of such options, similar or equivalent to those described herein, can be used in the practice or embodiments of this disclosure, the preferred materials and methods are described herein.
It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of this disclosure only and is not intended to be limiting.
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and is not intended to represent the only exemplary embodiments in which the present disclosure can be practiced. The term “exemplary” used throughout this description means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration,” and should not necessarily be construed as preferred or advantageous over other exemplary embodiments. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of the exemplary embodiments of the specification. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the exemplary embodiments of the specification may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the novelty of the exemplary embodiments presented herein.
For purposes of convenience and clarity only, directional terms, such as top, bottom, left, right, up, down, over, above, below, beneath, rear, back, and front, may be used with respect to the accompanying drawings. These and similar directional terms should not be construed to limit the scope of the disclosure in any manner.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one having ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure pertains.
Finally, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a, “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As noted above, transradial catheterization offers significant benefits over femoral approaches due to the potential for reduced complications. By employing the techniques of this disclosure, the use of a sheath may be avoided when introducing a guide catheter into a vessel of the patient, such as the radial artery. Since a sheath is not required, a correspondingly larger diameter guide catheter may be employed. For a majority of coronary interventions, a 6 French guide catheter is required. While the median radial artery diameter ranges from 1.9 mm to 2.5 mm in different ethnic populations, conventional use of a 2.5 mm access (6 French sheath) is more likely to lead to above-mentioned problems.
While sheaths were originally designed for femoral artery access, differences in anatomy and physiology of the arteries such as radial artery and pedal artery may preclude the need to employ a sheath for access. Thus, sheathless access in to an artery may be used to carry out every catheterization task and may allow use of a guide catheter having an outer diameter that is significantly smaller than that which would be required when using a respective sheath size. For example, entry with a guide catheter instead of a sheath may be accomplished with a smaller overall diameter for a respective French size, such as 0.5 mm or smaller. In turn, this reduces the potential for stretching or expanding the artery and likewise may reduce irritation, inflammation, pain and/or the chance of iatrogenic artery occlusion. As such, these techniques may be employed to reduce the size of entry in any catheterization procedure, including those for transradial, transbrachial, transfemoral and transpedal access as well as others.
The techniques of this disclosure permit transradial access, for example, while avoiding the need of using a sheath completely and is therefore a true sheathless access that may be used for diagnostic as well as all kinds of coronary intervention procedures and peripheral procedures. Notably, these techniques work in every patient with a smaller size puncture (hole) for the respective catheter size required. Most diagnostic and many intervention procedures may be performed by 1.67 mm (5 French) guide catheter with sheathless access, and, if required, the same access may be expanded to a larger size, such as a 2.00 mm (6 French) or a 2.32 mm (7 French) guide catheter. Even for such increased sizes, the use of a correspondingly larger sheath is avoided to reduce radial access size in every procedure and thereby reduce or even eliminate the limitations of radial access, such as spasm, pain, injury, radial occlusion, and the inability to perform complex interventions. Embodiments of the present disclosure may solve all the above-mentioned problems related to transradial catheterization.
To help illustrate aspects of this disclosure, an exemplary embodiment of a radial access dilator is shown schematically in
As will be described in further detail below, exchange of guide catheters may be accomplished through the use of a second radial access dilator 30, which is depicted in
Both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 may be formed from any suitable polymeric material having the desired characteristics. In some embodiments, nylon (polyamide), urethane, polypropylene, as well as polyamide co-polymers such as, for example, polyether block amides (PEBAX®), or others may be employed. Further, the relative dimensions of radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 may be selected as desired. In one embodiment, both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 may have an overall length of approximately 130 cm, so as to extend approximately 10-20 cm from the proximal end of the guide catheter when preloaded for introduction into the vessel. With this configuration, the proximal ends of both the guide catheter and the dilator may be manipulated during introduction and advancement. Accordingly, a suitable range for the length of either or both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 is approximately 130 to 140 cm in some embodiments and may be other lengths as desired depending on the procedure and/or the artery being accessed. The maximal outer diameter of radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 may correspond to the inner diameter of the guide catheter(s) being used in the procedure. For example, for a 6 French guide catheter, the maximal outer diameter may be approximately 1.80 mm, with corresponding adjustment for other sizes. The inner diameter of lumens 22 and 32 may also be selected based on the diameters of the first and second guidewires being used during the exchange procedure. In one embodiment, lumen 22 of radial access dilator 10 may have a diameter corresponding to a 0.021″ (0.58 mm) guidewire and lumen 32 of radial access dilator 30 may have a diameter corresponding to a 0.035″ (0.88 mm) guidewire, although different guidewires having other diameters may be employed as desired.
The distance to guidewire exit port 16 may be tailored to the desired application and, in some embodiments, may be the same for both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30. For example, the distance from distal end 12 to guidewire exit port for radial access dilator 10, as indicated by D1 in
Further, either of both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 may feature one or markers 34 at a suitable distance from distal end 12 as indicated by D2 in
One suitable technique for employing one or both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 for transradial catheterization, including exchange of guide catheters if desired is schematically represented in
Beginning with
The guide catheter 44 of operator's choice will be pre-loaded on radial access dilator 10, which may then be advanced over guidewire 42 in to the radial artery as shown in
If the operator needs to use a different shape or larger size guide catheter, guidewire 46 may be maintained in its advanced location, or if it has been removed, it may be advanced again through guide catheter 44. Guide catheter 44 may then be removed as shown in
As will be appreciated from the above description, access to the radial artery using either or both radial access dilator 10 and radial access dilator 30 may be accomplished with at least a 0.5 mm smaller hole and a smaller intrusion into the radial artery as compared to conventional entry with a sheath. For example, a 6 French sheath will lead to 2.61 mm puncture in radial artery while using radial access dilator 10, the radial artery puncture and the maximal diameter of a device to be inserted in the artery may be reduced to approximately 2.00 mm. In this manner, most or all patients will be able to tolerate the use of a 6 French guide catheter, with considerably less trauma. Further, a 7 French guide catheter (outer diameter 2.3 mm) may be used with a greater proportion of patients, so that more complex coronary procedures and peripheral procedures may be performed. In other procedures, a 5 French guide catheter may be employed. Regardless of the size of the guide catheter, the requirement of a smaller hole and avoidance/reduction of expansion and/or irritation of the radial artery as compared to access with a sheath will reduce or eliminate, spasm, pain, inflammation and occlusion, and allow a successful transradial catheterization. As noted, the techniques of the this disclosure allow the operator to use any guide catheter of any shape or size, by any manufacturer, and allows the operator to exchange guide catheters as many times as required without additional cost (equipment). Since the techniques provide a true sheathless access and do not require any radial sheath, substantial cost savings may be realized in addition to the reduction in invasiveness of the procedure.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently disclosed embodiments of the invention. Workers skilled in the art and technology to which this invention pertains will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structure may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principal, spirit and scope of this invention. As understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the drawings are not necessarily to scale. Accordingly, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read consistent with and as support to the following claims which are to have their fullest and fair scope.
This application claims priority from and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/057,764 filed Sep. 30, 2014, which is entitled “DEVICE TO ACHIEVE AND USE SHEATHLESS RADIAL ARTERY ACCESS FOR TRANSRADIAL CATHETERIZATION,” which is assigned to the assignee hereof and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62057764 | Sep 2014 | US |
