This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2007/058747, filed Aug. 22, 2007 and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of German application No. 10 2006 040 497.1 DE filed Aug. 30, 2006, both of the applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a method according to the preamble of the main claim and a device according to the preamble of the coordinated claim.
A large number of location identification/positioning methods and systems use what is known as the TDOA principle, where TDOA stands for “Time Difference of Arrival”. In this way it becomes possible to locate objects, in particular terminal devices. Toward that end an object whose location is to be identified transmits a signal which is received by a plurality of fixed stations. The time difference between the arrival times at the individual fixed stations enables the position of the object whose location is to be identified to be determined with the aid of triangulation calculations.
An important prerequisite for determining an object's position is that the fixed stations establish the times of arrival in the same time axis. A clock offset leads to positions being identified incorrectly.
Δt12=(T0+Δt2)−(T0+Δt1)=Δt2−Δt1
Δt23=(T0+Δt3)−(T0+Δt2)=Δt3−Δt2
Δt31=(T0+Δt1)−(T0+Δt3)=Δt1−Δt3
According to formula 1, the time offset T0 can be factored out by means of the time differences. If, on the other hand, the stations have different time offsets T1, T2 and T3, the time differences that result according to formula 2 are:
Δt12=(T2+Δt2)−(T1+Δt1)
Δt23=(T3+Δt3)−(T2+Δt2)
Δt31=(T1+Δt1)−(T3+Δt3)
According to formula 2 it is clear that the unknown time offsets can no longer be factored out by means of the time differences and determining a position can henceforth only be carried out with inaccuracies. This is clear according to
Inaccuracies of said kind result in the case of all usable signals, such as, for example, optical, acoustic or electromagnetic signals.
A time synchronization between the individual fixed stations is of great importance for the use of a location identification/positioning system on account of the possible inaccuracies. In order to maintain a high degree of accuracy in the meter or sub-meter range, a clock offset must not be greater than a few picoseconds when electromagnetic or optical signals are used.
According to the prior art there are a number of synchronization methods available, though all of them are associated with high overhead and high costs.
According to the prior art, with the systems used, a highly accurate time synchronization is necessary between all the fixed stations or, as the case may be, stations with specified locations in order to reduce measurement inaccuracies to the necessary extent.
A generally known system is the conventional Global Positioning System (GPS), whose satellites have atomic clocks on board in order to ensure the same time axis is used. In addition the satellites are able to transmit synchronization data to one another with the aid of a direct line-of-sight link by means of laser beam. Disadvantageously, the costs and overhead for this synchronization are high.
Conventional location identification/positioning systems that are used, for example, on factory floors or on parking lots constantly synchronize the fixed stations with the aid of special synchronization algorithms by means of electric conductors or by means of radio links. Optical links are also possible. In this way the internal clocks are adjusted at regular intervals. A regular synchronization is necessary because the clocks, which use in particular quartz crystals, have both a time offset and slightly different frequencies. The positions of the fixed stations and the line lengths for synchronization must be known exactly in order to keep measurement errors to a minimum.
Further conventional systems use reference timers which transmit a synchronization signal at regular intervals. For that purpose the distances between the individual fixed stations and the fixed reference timer must be precisely known in order to take the travel time of the reference time signals into account during the synchronization.
Conventionally, synchronization algorithms or, as the case may be, reference timers are used, although the overhead is great.
It is the object of the present invention to locate an object X with a sufficiently high degree of accuracy at low cost by means of the TDOA (Time Difference of Arrival) principle in such a way that the object X whose location is to be identified transmits a signal which is received by a plurality of fixed stations whose clocks can have different unknown initial time offsets, yet no time synchronization is necessary between the individual fixed stations.
The object is achieved by means of a method according to the main claim. The object is achieved by means of a device according to the coordinated claim. Further advantageous embodiments are set forth in the dependent claims.
An object X whose location is to be identified transmits a signal which is received by a plurality of fixed stations Bi having known positions. The travel times of the signals from the station X whose location is to be identified to the fixed stations Bi are designated by ΔtXi. The clocks in the fixed stations Bi can now have any time offsets Ti. Approximately the same frequency should be applicable, however. Deviations of a few parts per million (ppm), as is usual with high-quality quartz crystals, are tolerable, since these lead to a small error which is acceptable.
In contrast to the prior art, a reference station R is additionally included in a conventional arrangement. The position of the reference station R relative to the fixed stations Bi must be known.
The travel times of the signals from the fixed reference station R to the fixed stations Bi are designated by ΔtRi. Each fixed station Bi (i element from N) now determines, not the absolute time of the signal arrivals, but only the travel time difference Δti between the arrival of the signals from the object X and the reference station R. In this case an error due to slightly different clock frequencies is all the smaller, the closer in time object X and reference station R have transmitted their respective signals. In this way knowledge of the clock time offsets Ti is not necessary.
A time offset ΔtXR can be present between the transmission of the signal by object X and the transmission of the signal by the reference station R. Said unknown time offset or transmission offset ΔtXR can be factored out by forming the difference in the travel time differences Δti between the fixed stations.
The following variables are sufficient for determining the position of the object X:
The positions of the stations Bi and the reference station R;
The measured or calculated values of the differences in the travel time differences Δti between the stations Bi.
Finally, only triangulation calculations or generally known mathematical calculations, for example, must be performed for determining the position. Triangulation is a method used in trigonometry and elementary geometry for finding the distance from a point.
In this way a synchronization is no longer necessary. A cost-effective and flexible location identification/positioning system can be created. The cost aspect is often of great importance. The essential advantage of the present invention is that aforesaid highly precise time synchronizations no longer need to take place between the fixed stations Bi. A further fixed station R is used which transmits, synchronously or with an offset in time, in the same channel as X or in a different channel. According to the method of the main claim, neither determining the unknown clock offsets Ti, nor determining the unknown transmission offset ΔtXR is necessary since these can be factored out by means of mathematical formulae used. If object X and reference station R transmit in only one channel, a transmission offset ΔtXR is at least as large as the length of the signal from object X.
Further advantageous embodiments are set forth in the dependent claims.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the signal from the object X and signal from the reference station R are transmitted simultaneously in two different channels. The use of two different channels for object X and reference station R enables the fully synchronous transmission of signals from both stations. In this way the measurement rate, i.e. the number of measurements per second, and an achievable precision can advantageously be improved. The transmission offset ΔtXR between the transmission of the signal from the object X and the transmission of the signal from the reference station R is zero and consequently does not need to be taken into account any further.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, the object X and the reference station R are prompted by a station Bi to transmit their signals simultaneously by means of a common trigger line. Both the reference station R and the object X are prompted to transmit their signals simultaneously by way of a common trigger line which can be wired or wireless.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, the reference station R transmits in a first channel, or in a second channel if the reference station R has detected that the object X is transmitting in a first channel, with a time offset ΔtXR being applicable between the transmission of the signal by the object X and the transmission of the signal by the reference station R. R transmits only after X has transmitted. Particularly advantageously, no synchronization must be produced between the two signals. Use of a common channel or two different channels is possible. According to this embodiment the reference station R is passive until it has detected a signal from object X. Then the signal of the reference station R can either be transmitted with the signal of object X in the same or a different channel, or almost simultaneously with the object X in a different channel. According to this embodiment, R transmits only if R has detected that X is transmitting. This embodiment variant is particularly advantageous because in this way communication between the base stations Bi and the reference station R is unnecessary. According to this embodiment, a communication with X does not need to take place since the object X transmits a signal, for example, at fixed time intervals or upon detecting an event. This embodiment can be improved particularly advantageously by use of two channels.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, the signal from the object X and the signal from the reference station R are transmitted in two different channels with an arbitrary time offset. An arbitrary time offset ΔtXR between the transmission of the signal by the object X and the transmission of the signal by the reference station R is generated. Particularly advantageously, no synchronization needs to be produced between the two signals. The smaller the transmission offset ΔtXR or, as the case may be, the time offset ΔtXR, the smaller is the error due to slightly different clock frequencies of the stations Bi which should have approximately the same frequency. The signal from the object X and the signal from the reference station R can equally be transmitted offset in time in one channel.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, a communication takes place between the fixed stations Bi so that the differences in the travel time differences Δti can be determined. A communication of said kind can be established in a wired or wireless manner and places no special requirements on the travel time of the communication signals.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, the clock frequency of the reference station R is determined by means of the signal transmitted by the reference station R and deviations of the clock frequencies of the stations Bi are factored out. In this way there is a possibility to compensate for a difference in the clock frequencies in the individual fixed stations Bi which are a reason for inaccuracies in determining the position of object X.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, objects X are terminal devices conforming to the IEEE 802.15.4 standard.
According to the device claims, devices are claimed by means of which methods according to the method claims can be carried out.
The present invention is described in more detail below with reference to exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the figures, in which:
Δt12=(T0+Δt2)−(T0+Δt1)=Δt2−Δt1
Δt23=(T0+Δt3)−(T0+Δt2)=Δt3−Δt2
Δt31=(T0+Δt1)−(T0+Δt3)=Δt1−Δt3
Δt12=(T2+Δt2)−(T1+Δt1)
Δt23=(T3+Δt3)−(T2+Δt2)
Δt31=(T1+Δt1)−(T3+Δt3)
Determining an object's position can only be carried out with inaccuracies. A measured position X′ differs from the actual position X:
The clocks or, as the case may be, time recording devices in the fixed stations B1, B2 and B3 may now have the unknown and arbitrary time offsets T1, T2 and T3, though these should have approximately the same frequency. Deviations of a few parts per million (ppm), as is usual with high-quality quartz crystals, are acceptable. They lead merely to a small, tolerable error.
The considerably greater error source due to the time offset ΔtXR is removed as follows:
Both X and R transmit a signal. The following combinations of the sending of the two signals are possible. These are shown according to
R and X transmit simultaneously in two different channels, for example by common triggering from a fixed station Bi via a trigger line (case
R and X transmit offset in time in two different channels (cases
R and X transmit offset in time in the same channel (case
R transmits as soon as R detects that X is transmitting. In this instance both variants are also applicable, namely one channel or two channels (cases
In the first case both R and X are prompted by way of a common trigger line (wired or wireless) to transmit their signals simultaneously. In the last case R is passive until it detects a signal from X. Then the signal from R can be transmitted either after the signal from X in the same or a different channel (cases c and d), or almost simultaneously with X in a different channel (b).
Except for case (a) an unknown time offset, designated by ΔtXR, results between the transmission of the signals from X and R.
Each fixed station B1, B2 and B3 now determines, not the absolute time of the signal arrivals, but only the time difference between the arrival of the signals from X and R. In this case the error due to slightly different clock frequencies of the clocks in the fixed stations B1, B2 and B3 is all the smaller, the closer in time X and R have transmitted their signals. It is particularly advantageous if, for example, the time offset ΔtXR is less than 10% of the duration of the signal from the object X. Knowledge of the clock offsets T1, T2 and T3 is not necessary. The results for the travel time difference in the signals from X and R at the three fixed stations B1, B2 and B3 (formula 3) are:
Δt1=(T1+ΔtR1+ΔtXR)−(T1+ΔtX1)=ΔtR1−ΔtX1+ΔtXR
Δt2=(T2+ΔtR2+ΔtXR)−(T2+ΔtX2)=ΔtR2−ΔtX2+ΔtXR
Δt3=(T3+ΔtR3+ΔtXR)−(T3+ΔtX3)=ΔtR3−ΔtX3+ΔtXR
The unknown transmission offset ΔtXR is factored out below by forming the difference of the travel time differences Δti between the fixed stations (formula 4):
Δt12=Δt2−Δt1=(ΔtR2−ΔtX2+ΔtXR)−(ΔtR1−ΔtX1+ΔtXR)=ΔtR2−ΔtX2−ΔtR1+ΔtX1
Δt23=Δt3−Δt2=(ΔtR3−ΔtX3+ΔtXR)−(ΔtR2−ΔtX2+ΔtXR)=ΔtR3−ΔtX3−Δt2+ΔtX2
Δt31=Δt1−Δt3=(ΔtR1−ΔtX1+ΔtXR)−(ΔtR3−ΔtX3+ΔtXR)=ΔtR1−ΔtX1−ΔtR3+ΔtX3
ΔtXR does not need to be known. Consequently, the three values determined by means of formula 4 can be determined through measurement of the travel time differences Δt1, Δt2 and Δt3, which can be carried out by means of conventional digital signal processing algorithms. The following variables are sufficient for determining the position or identifying the location of the object X according to the modified TDOA principle described here:
The positions of B1, B2, B3 and R;
The measured or calculated values of the differences Δt12, Δt23 and Δt31 in the travel time differences Δti.
It is self-evident that calculating Δt12, Δt23 and Δt31 necessitates a communication between the fixed stations B1, B2 and B3. The communication can take place on a wired or wireless basis and places no special requirements on the travel times of the communication signals. The method and the device according to the present invention differ significantly from the methods according to the prior art. According to the present application, no communication is necessary with X and R.
The industrial radio standard IEEE 802.15.4 and the routing algorithms of the ZigBee Alliance that are based thereon are already being used today and will be used increasingly in the future for building and manufacturing automation. The advantages are a particularly robust data transmission through the use of low data rates with high bandwidths and the possibility of building a self-organizing mesh network for data transmission over long distances. The small current consumption allows the use of small terminal devices with high battery life.
ZigBee routing according to the IEEE 802.15.4 standard is particularly advantageous if a precise identification of the location of a ZigBee terminal device is possible. In this case assigning physical addresses can be dispensed with and addressing can be implemented by way of positions. As an example let a light switch be cited which is to switch on, not lamp no. 547, but the lamp at position (X/Y/Z) equal to (5 m/7 m/1 m). For this, a high degree of precision is necessary in order to be able to distinguish the lamp unambiguously from the adjacent lamps. The present invention is of interest in particular for this application, since a location identification/positioning system can be built cheaply and flexibly. The advantageous absence of communication links to the stations X whose locations are to be identified benefits in particular ZigBee terminal devices which possess no receiver but transmit a signal only when specific events occur (when a light switch is pressed, for example). The reference station R receives said signal and sends the required reference signal afterward. ZigBee permits the use of a plurality of channels, thereby enabling these embodiment variants to be used also.
In this way the greatest technological problem confronting ZigBee to date, namely the precise identification of the location of terminal devices with minimal intervention in the existing infrastructure, can be solved.
It is possible for proprietary location identification/positioning systems to be replaced by the location identification system described in this invention. The majority of conventional location identification/positioning systems operate in a proprietary manner, with high precision, at very high cost. An alternative is for conventional location identification/positioning systems to use standard hardware such as wireless local area networks (WLANs), though these allow a very low precision of position determination at low cost. The method and the device according to the present invention enable the position or location of an object X to be determined or identified with a sufficiently high degree of precision at low cost.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 040 497 | Aug 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/058747 | 8/22/2007 | WO | 00 | 2/24/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/025713 | 3/6/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4916455 | Bent et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
20030069025 | Hoctor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040108954 | Richley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040260506 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050130669 | Mizugaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060022873 | Zimmerman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060133271 | Mizugaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183485 | Mizugaki et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090115658 | Zimmerman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 763 164 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2330716 | Apr 1999 | GB |
WO 2005098465 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090322615 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |