Patent Application
20200383313
The invention relates to a method and a device for the maintenance of ground areas and to a weed eradication device, in particular a weed control device. As a rule, because it is not possible to completely eradicate an entire population of plants, but only keep it under control, the term “weed control device” is the more accurate description.
Cities and communities in particular have less and less money for removing weeds in urban areas. At the same time, the increasing severity of environmental legislation means that now, practically no herbicides with long-term effects are available, because spraying on hard surfaces (for example traffic areas) is completely forbidden and exemptions are difficult to obtain.
For these reasons too, more and more cities are changing from the zero-tolerance policy towards weeds in public areas, which policy has now all too often become entirely theoretical, to a policy of allowing acceptable levels of weeds through systematic planning. Thus, different guidelines have been specified for different regions in order to determine how much spontaneous vegetation by number and size can be envisaged to be acceptable in a specific region. An intervention is only made when the limits of the guidelines are exceeded. This acceptance of plant growth leads to a number of problems to be solved, however, so that questions regarding safety can be clearly answered, so that maintaining the planned status is economically efficient and so that the number of complaints from citizens can be systematically kept within limits.
The identical questions arise in the field of integrated management of agricultural and non-agricultural areas such as on traffic areas and farmland or for wine and fruit growing, where spontaneous vegetation gradually competes with cultivated plants for water and nutrients and which may constitute a risk of disease or, for example, may cause restrictions to access or give rise to a risk of accidents. In this regard, it has been shown that the challenges of treating traffic areas in urban areas are very similar to those challenges which are encountered when treating areas in vineyards and in orchards. Weeds must be dealt with regularly—but not all weeds have to be removed. The limits set by the guidelines have to be adhered to in an intelligent manner. This leads to the following problems:
All areas which are potentially affected by weed have to be identified efficiently so that they can be managed properly. Each area must be assigned a specific maintenance classification, at best without costly on-site visits. Because logistics planning for maintenance now has to be carried out in a targeted manner rather than the previously employed zero tolerance target, a reorientation from calendar-based (patrol/control every x weeks) to needs-based operations is necessary so that the maintenance targets can be met.
The need for weed management is highly dependent upon weather and local growth conditions. However, these can vary widely both in an urban area or, for example, in a highly-profiled mountainous region because of the large number of influencing factors, and thus are significantly more difficult to predict from larger-scale precipitation or temperature measurements on flat agricultural land.
Based on actual observations, it is almost impossible to set up a sensible requirement plan for the treatment of all urban areas, because for this, they would have to be permanently monitored. The need to forward plan for several days and the naturally limited number of maintenance operatives and maintenance vehicles makes scheduling maintenance plans extremely difficult. Furthermore, dividing urban regions into different maintenance zones leads to an increasing segmentation of the maintenance requirements, which makes it almost impossible to plan routes based simply on habit.
A further serious, if not the most important new biological dynamic, arises due to the different levels of acceptance of more or taller weeds. Because lots of weeds are allowed to grow undisturbed higher/for longer at many locations, and in the case of open ground they are not moved if at all possible, they have a better opportunity to store energy in the rooting bodies. This situation is the same when only the leaves are removed from the surface by mechanical or thermal methods. Regrowth can occur faster because of the energy reserves, and the speed of growth is significantly more dependent on the temperature and the available moisture. Thus, the speed of re-growth is significantly more dependent on the individual plants and their history (when treated, how often and with what methods), which latter is a function of whether and to what extent the plants were able to store energy, and for how long.
The previous scheme from the era of chemical plant protection, in which almost every treated and usually small plant dies following the treatment, and then a completely new growth from seeds begins, is thus being replaced by non-homogeneous management of existing plants. The use of different mechanical and physical removal procedures for different lengths of time makes a prediction even more difficult in the case of root weeds because, for example, electrical removal methods can deeply affect storage roots, while superficial mechanical and thermal methods leave the roots intact.
The use of new types of substructures and joint fillers for hard surfaces and different types of ground can have a considerable influence on regrowth, leaving the logistics manager in charge of weed removal without a reasonable opportunity to identify all of these factors and to apply them appropriately without specific technical solutions.
The quality criteria for an acceptable abundance of weeds have to be converted into a language and regulations that can be evaluated technically/sensorially. It is only in this manner that it can be ensured that the cleaning and measuring vehicles measure usable quantitative information. It is only in this manner that it can be determined that the cleaning has taken place at a time which is within specifications or whether weed control has been carried out too late. This is absolutely necessary for quality assurance of the weed management targets which have been specified.
Because in many cases, thermal and mechanical methods have proved to be only partial solutions to weed management and many regions have in the meantime gone wild due to a lack of maintenance (and so the plants have stored a lot of energy underground), it is vital to find a non-chemical method which has a massive effect on root weeds even in hard surface regions and on traffic areas.
The ensuing aim is achieved by means of a method with the features of patent claim 1. Advantageous further developments are defined in the dependent claims. The solution consists of a series of individual features which achieve the described aim individually and in combination with a plurality of features. With significantly reduced maintenance costs in a differentiated maintenance landscape, this gives rise to a planned maintenance status even under changeable weather conditions and more improved measures for the differentiated management of spontaneous vegetation.
The “ground areas” in this regard are different ground areas in the agricultural and non-agricultural sector which are treated with devices for weed eradication. In this regard, during operations or during treatment, data regarding the weed growth can be captured from various devices and relayed to a computer to be exploited there for self-learning optimization and projection of a forecast.
In particular, these are data regarding the factors influencing weed growth in the region of the ground areas which are captured with the aid of various devices and loaded into a computer and which can be stored in the computer. In this manner, information regarding the quality of the ground and the weeds to be destroyed can be transmitted from the computer to the weed eradication or weed control device in order to select and optimize the operating parameters and methods for weed eradication. The computer can be used to draw up a weed development forecast and to produce a plan for future treatment of the ground area from it.
In particular when, during an operation, data regarding the procedure for weed eradication itself is transmitted to a computer, these data may be used for the quantification and classification of the current ground or weed quality and for a forecast of the local and seasonal ground or weed quality, for the invoicing of tools and treatment costs, for the control of robotic control devices or for system control.
An advantageous device comprises at least one of the following elements:
The device and the method are suitable for the management and control of areas such as public traffic areas in particular, but also of private traffic areas, parks, cemeteries, infrastructure areas and buildings, overgrown roofs, leisure areas, nature reserves and conservation areas, permanent crop areas such as vineyards and orchards, etc.
Algorithmically speaking, the database may be able to predict the weed growth from newly acquired and historic data and to forecast from it both the actual situation at any time in which the areas have not yet been traversed, and also a usable profile for the next days and weeks. The database can be continuously supplied with real weed data, in particular from the electrophysical weed control units, which leads to a continuous increase in the capability of providing a forecast, even for regions which currently can neither be reached with sensor technology nor can be treated using the electrophysical method (self-learning systems). The operation of the large tools, and also the operation of all other weed management measures, can thus be progressively planned logistically on the basis of this data.
The term “other tools” as used here should be understood to mean any type of tool for cleaning, monitoring and removing weeds, from a portable compact tool via wheeled or people-carrying tools up to entire vehicles with drivers, and also encompassing autonomously moving units independently of the treatment methods used therein and their sensor systems (not necessarily present).
The captured sensor and process data and also the operational data (type, method, etc) for the sensor system which is not connected or only connected to identify the operational area, in combination with known weather conditions (and weather forecasts) and a growth model established from physical/biological or purely empirical data may be used as a part of the method. In this manner, the forecast model can estimate or simulate the actual situation for growth of spontaneous vegetation for individual regions even without further measurement and forecast for the future for a limited period. By comparing the simulation model with the planning maintenance situation and the availability of maintenance operatives and maintenance technology, a dynamic, self-learning working tool for logistic control can then be efficiently generated which supports the relevant fleet manager in respect of decision-making and route planning.
In places where high voltage cannot be used, such as in particular in the vicinity of fences, metal covers, etc, independently of the features of the method discussed above, the exhaust heat from a vehicle engine or from a device for producing high voltage (exhaust gas, cooling water, process heat) may advantageously be used to produce hot water or steam.
The problem to be solved by the invention is solved by using a device which comprises a high voltage means for weakening and eradicating weed, and furthermore comprises a further device for weed control or for weed removal from a traversed region.
The further device may be designed for treatment with chemical agents, or it may be designed as a mechanical device. Advantageously, as the further device, a means is used which uses the exhaust heat such as exhaust gas, cooling water or process heat from a vehicle propulsion unit or a means for producing high voltage for the production of hot water or steam, in order to control weeds thereby.
In order, for example, to be able to use data from street sweepers, walking street cleaning operatives, airborne objects, transport and delivery vehicles and also manually guided compact vehicles or on-board sensor systems such as mobile phones the primary purpose of which is not to eradicate weeds, it is proposed that localized and time-dated data regarding the growth of weeds should be captured from various weed eradication devices or mobile systems and transmitted to the computer. This means that other data are made available with sensor or input devices of this type.
With the aid of empirical and model-based algorithms, a GIS system supplied with measurement data from weed control units and other tools provides an estimate of the actual situation and forecasts the weed development, compares this with predetermined weed management targets and makes appropriate suggestions for optimized control logistics.
As far as is permissible, all of the vehicles used for maintenance are equipped with GPS and, automatically or after manual initialization, input data into the GIS system as to when, where and with which methods the spontaneous vegetation was removed as weeds.
Manual cleaning may also be input as regards the methods, the time and the extent of the area if this has not been carried out automatically by the devices. In particular, partial or fully automatic communication and localization of the equipment via mobile phone applications is part of the method. To this end, cleaning tools carrying weeding equipment are equipped with mobile phone units or interfaces to commercial mobile phone units which are equipped with a data filter in order to comply with operational and data protection requirements so that only legally permissible data can be picked up and transmitted.
The vehicles used for electrophysical weed removal preferably have a sensor system which can specifically draw conclusions about the status of the spontaneous vegetation prior to removal. A continuous determination of the actual values forms the basis for model computations, which incorporate weather and location data (for example shading model, daytime model, temperature model or purely empirical growth factors), being continuously adapted to reality, thereby increasing the reliability of the forecast from the self-learning system.
Advantageously but not exclusively, the vehicles used are treatment vehicles which can carry out an electrophysical treatment of the plants. However, other larger, for example mechanical or thermal treatment units, may be equipped with sensors or process-based information loggers. In addition, tools which are not primarily intended for removing weeds, such as street sweepers or delivery and service vehicles, in particular electrically driven vehicles, may be suitably equipped with sensor systems.
The sensor system may, inter alia but not exclusively, consist of the following sensor systems: green detector, fluorescence measurement, height profile determination, photographic images for the identification of species, image capture for documenting specific situations, active multicolour sensors for the determination of spectral relationships, multi- and hyperspectral cameras, etc.
The vehicles used also transmit information regarding the treatment methods used to the GIS system in a spatially resolved manner so that this may be a further influencing factor for the forecasting algorithm.
The operating system may also be extended from hard ground to green areas and other non-agricultural and agricultural areas with similar management characteristics which have to be managed (cemeteries, meadows, borders, plantations, etc).
In order to simplify data collection, operatives and perhaps also interested citizens may be equipped with mobile phone-based classification systems with GPS tracking which can immediately assess compliance with the stages of maintenance on-site, or can assist with a visual assessment of compliance and document the result.
Local climate models may be optimized by incorporating small weather stations into pedal-powered or preferably electric delivery vehicles, for example for delivering newspapers, parcels and letters. Even busses and police vehicles on street patrol and possibly even street sweepers and other municipal vehicles could contribute to improving the data set by using meteorological data acquisition systems. Here again, the captured data regarding humidity of the air, light intensity, precipitation etc will always be provided to the GIS system in combination with GPS data which is accurate down to the relevant side of the street and will serve to improve the model.
Where it is reasonable and necessary, additional data from existing geodetically based or commercial agricultural and urban models (including, for example Google Maps, Open Streetview and analogous options), flying drones, satellites or sensors based on other aircraft may be used for identifying areas, surface temperatures, shadowing and for comparing weed growth and can be input into the database.
The criteria used in the catalogues of requirements for weed management can be rendered algorithmically ascertainable. To this end, imaging sensor systems are used which consist of a height scan and simultaneous green and preferably fluorescence assessment of the image or, more simply and preferably, a line scan. In the database, the line scans or the narrow strips of the image are associated with a precise region by means of GPS location. These data also constitute the basis for the growth model and are extrapolated onto the overall area to be controlled.
Particular attention should be drawn to tracking invasive and problematic plants which cannot be controlled in a single operation and/or are difficult to see during monitoring. In this case, in addition to forecast data as regards regrowth, monitoring regions may also be defined; every operative who intentionally comes into the vicinity of the area or who passes through it is informed about the need for it to be monitored, either via work assignments or via online notices, In order to identify the sites quickly, they are localized during the current control procedure using GPS. They may also be overlaid onto a real image on a controller's monitor (attached to the vehicle or a mobile facility (possibly a mobile phone)) using augmented reality (“Pokemon function”). In this manner, the areas can be located again during a check or subsequent treatment, their status is recorded (manually/automatically) and further action can be proposed.
The control of invasive plant species, the communication of reports and complaints to and from citizens and operatives can in particular be documented with mobile phone-based apps via the control tools independently of the means. Here again, in accordance with the invention, it is possible to prepare the data in a manner such that the initially identified regions (for example as a result of complaints) can easily be found again using virtual overlays (augmented reality).
The invention will now be illustrated and described with the aid of the drawings. In the drawings:
In the vehicle 40 shown in
In this manner, localized and time-dated data 69 regarding the weed growth can be captured from different weed eradication devices 62, 63 and 74 or mobile systems 60, 61 and transmitted to the computer 70.
The availability of the maintenance operatives and weed eradication devices as well as weather data and light information regarding the region of the ground areas to be maintained can also be input into the computer 70 and can then be used for planning the operations.
Advantageously, values regarding the status of the weeds prior to their treatment with a weed eradication device are contained in the data 69 regarding the weed growth and these are subsequently displayed on-site via electronic systems such as screens, overlays, VR glasses (not shown).
The weed eradication device 62, 63, 74 may be moved manually or with a vehicle 3. It can transmit data wirelessly or by cable to a mobile system 61 such as, in particular, a mobile phone, which then relays the data to the computer 70.
The ground area 68 may be treated with different weed eradication devices 62, 63, 74 and the at least one parameter 71, which may also be a forecast, can be overlaid in a spatially localized manner on the screen of a mobile camera system such as, for example, a mobile phone.
In order to produce hot water or steam 73, as can be seen in
The weed eradication device 74 comprises a sensor system 21, 33, 34 for detecting the weed growth and an interface 76 so that it can transmit data 69 to a computer 70 wirelessly or via a cable. The computer 70 comprises an interface 76 so that it can transmit data 69 or computed data to a mobile system 61, such as a mobile phone in particular. For the purposes of weed eradication, it has a high voltage means 75 for weakening and eradicating the weed and furthermore, it has at least one further device such as the jets 47 for producing steam 73 for weed control or for weed removal from the region being traversed.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2016 014 101.8 | Nov 2016 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/DE2017/000406 | 11/28/2017 | WO | 00 |
