This application claims priority on European App. No. EP12164937, filed Apr. 20, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Not applicable.
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for winding fiber webs, particularly partial paper and board webs, into partial web rolls, in which method, partial web rolls are wound via a nip between a winding roll and the partial web roll being formed on a winding station in connection with the winding roll.
It is known that a fiber web, e.g. paper, is manufactured in machines which together constitute a paper-manufacturing line which can be hundreds of meters long. Modern paper machines can produce over 450,000 tons of paper per year. The speed of the paper machine can exceed 2,000 m/min and the width of the paper web can be more than 11 meters.
In paper-manufacturing lines, the manufacture of paper takes place as a continuous process. A paper web completing in the paper machine is reeled by a reel-up around a reeling shaft, i.e. a reel spool, into a parent roll the diameter of which can be more than 5 meters and the weight more than 160 tons. The purpose of reeling is to modify the paper web manufactured as planar to a more easily processable form. On the reel-up located in the main machine line, the continuous process of the paper machine breaks for the first time and shifts into periodic operation.
The web of the parent roll produced in paper manufacture is full-width and even more than 100 km long so it must be slit into partial webs with suitable width and length for the customers of the paper mill and wound around cores into so-called customer rolls before delivering them from the paper mill. This slitting and winding up of the web takes place as known in an appropriate separate machine, i.e. a slitter-winder.
On the slitter-winder, the parent roll is unwound, the wide web is slit on the slitting section into several narrower partial webs which are wound up on the winding section around winding cores, such as spools, into customer rolls. When the customer rolls are completed, the slitter-winder is stopped and the wound rolls (i.e. the so-called set) are removed from the machine. Then, the process is continued with the winding of a new set. These steps are repeated periodically until paper runs out of the parent roll, whereby a parent roll change is performed and the operation starts again as the unwinding of a new parent roll.
Slitter-winders employ winding devices of different types depending on, inter alia, the type of the fiber web being wound. On slitter-winders of the multi-station winder type, the web is guided from the unwinding via guide rolls to the slitting section where the web is slit into partial webs which are further guided either from above or from below to the winding roll/rolls of the winding stations to be wound up onto cores into customer rolls. Adjacent partial webs are wound up on different sides of the winding roll/rolls. Multistation winders have one to three winding rolls and in them each partial web is wound to a partial web roll in its own winding station. During winding a winding nip is formed between the winding roll and the partial web roll to be wound.
In winding the winding nip between the partial web roll to be wound and the winding roll tightens the web in the area of the nip. If the nip load is uneven in width of the partial web roll i.e., in the axial direction of the partial web roll, the web tightens unevenly and causes creases and wrinkles at the bottom of the partial web roll. This problem is very difficult in winders with soft winding rolls i.e., winding rolls that have a surface layer of soft coating material.
Some multistation winder types of prior art are disclosed in patent publications U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,792,824, 5,405,099, 6,012,673, 4,550,887, 4,601,435, and EP 0711245. In these prior art arrangements the partial web rolls are wound on the upper half of the circumference of the winding roll, except in the arrangement of U.S. Pat. No. 3,792,824 in which the partial rolls are wound at the side of the winding roll. In these prior arrangements winding stations are equipped with center drives, which are used during winding.
Multistation winders may also comprise rider rolls that are used for creating further load at the beginning of the winding against the winding roll and for preventing the cores from bending. The rider rolls are used to create a uniform nip load and for avoiding too high loading of core chucks used for attaching the ends of the cores at the ends of cores/partial web rolls, which would cause problems in the bottom of the partial web rolls i.e., in the beginning layers of the partial web roll to be wound, which problems are common in winding.
In winding when the partial web roll has achieved enough stiffness the influence of the rider rolls decreases. In prior art arrangements typically the loading of rider rolls can be used up to certain diameters of the partial web rolls, usually up to the diameters of 250-450 mm.
In prior art arrangements the multistation winders have typically been provided by a center drive system connected to the core chucks, whereby the torque of the core chucks has been used to tighten the web to be wound on the partial web roll. It is known that by constant center torque the circumferential force is inversely proportional to the diameter of the web roll and thus it decreases as the diameter of the web roll increases. The endurance ability of the cores limits the torque transmittable from the chucks and thus the center torque is limited in its ability to control/adjustment of the tightness of the partial web roll.
From the prior art is also known multistation winders in which rider roll devices with integrated extra drives are used for creating surface traction effective on the surface of the partial web roll. In these prior art arrangements it has been possible to partially control/adjust the tightness of the partial web roll to be wound by this surface traction of the rider rolls. This kind of prior art arrangement is disclosed for example in EP patent 0711245, in which the rider rolls are in the beginning of the winding used for loading and supporting of the partial web roll to be wound and as the winding proceeds the rider rolls are moved downward along a part in direction of the circumference of the web roll and at the end of the winding the rider rolls support the web roll to be finished from below. In this prior art arrangement the surface traction can be used during the whole winding process. This winding arrangement is as a constructional structure, expensive and the rider rolls can be used for loading only up to the web roll diameters of about 450 mm. Also the surface traction needs to be limited at the stage, when the rider rolls are at the side of the partial web roll when moving along the circumference of the web roll to the, from below, supporting position.
In prior art multistation winders U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,792,824, 5,405,099, 6,012,673, 4,550,887 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,601,435 the rider rolls have no separate drives thus surface traction cannot be used.
In prior art arrangements of multistation winders of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,601,435 the rider rolls move some way in linear path before the rider roll beam supporting the rider rolls is lifted up but as in these types of multistation winders the center of the partial web roll to be wound moves a curved path due to pivoted winding arm i.e. the winding nip between the partial web roll and the winding roll moves during winding on the circumference of the winding roll downwards, the movement direction and movement area of the rider rolls must be optimized to be used at the most important stage of winding, i.e. at the beginning of the winding.
It has proven that discontinuing the loading of the rider rolls at this early stage causes problems and there would be a need to use the loading of the rider rolls during a longer period of the winding. It would be very advantageous if the loading of the rider roll could be used during the whole winding period of the partial web roll, especially in connection with certain fiber web grades, for example.
Thus an object of the invention is to create a device and a method for winding fiber webs where the rider roll loading can be used during the whole period of winding the partial web roll.
An object of the invention is to create a device and a method for winding fiber webs where the limited use of the rider roll loading and the limited use of surface traction of the rider rolls are eliminated.
An object of the invention is to provide a device and a method for winding fiber webs where the result of the winding is the best possible and similar in all simultaneously wound partial web rolls.
To achieve the above-mentioned objects and those which come out later, in the method of the invention rider rolls are moved linearly in the direction of the radius of the partial web roll and co-linear with the movement path of the winding chucks on which the partial web roll is supported at ends of its core and the partial web rolls are loaded and supported by the rider rolls in the direction of the center of the partial web roll from the beginning of the winding until the, partial web rolls are wound to the end diameter. The device according to the invention comprises guides on which the rider rolls are moved linearly in the direction of the radius of the partial web roll and co-linear with the movement path of the winding chucks on which the partial web roll is supported at ends of its core for supporting and loading the partial web rolls in the direction of the center of the partial web roll from the beginning of the winding until the partial web rolls are wound to the end diameter.
According to the invention the rider rolls are moved substantially linearly in the direction of the radius of the partial web roll and the partial web rolls are loaded and supported by the rider rolls in the direction of the center of the partial web roll from the beginning of the winding until the partial web rolls are wound to the end diameter.
According to an advantageous feature of the invention by the rider rolls surface traction is provided for controlling/adjusting the tightness of the partial web rolls during the whole winding process.
The invention relates to a method and a device of winding partial fiber web rolls which winding is advantageously multistation winder type winding and in which the winding position of the partial web rolls to be wound is on the upper circumferential half of the winding rolls on winding stations. The device comprises one or two winding rolls and the partial web rolls to be wound are alternating on each side of the device as in such known from prior art multistation winder types.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention each winding station comprises two winding carriages in which winding arms with winding heads/winding chucks are positioned and move along a linear path when the diameter of the partial web roll increases. Each carriage is provided with a separate loading/relief-device and each winding station comprises force measurement of loading and force feedback control based on results of the force measurement.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention the winding stations are movable in the width direction of the winder i.e. in the axial direction of the partial web rolls.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention on both sides of the winder linearly up and down movable cross-directional beams are provided. On the beams are attached rider roll units that load a pair of rider rolls against the partial web roll to be wound. The rider rolls are movable in the vertical direction of guides attached to the rider roll unit. Each rider roll unit is provided by a separate loading device.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention a drive motor is connected to the rider rolls of the rider roll unit by which arrangement the surface of the partial web roll to be wound can be loaded with a circumferential force, i.e. the surface traction can be provided.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention the rider roll units can be provided with force measurement of loading and with force feedback control/adjustment based on the force measurement results.
According to an advantageous aspect of the invention the rider roll units are movable in the cross-direction, i.e. in the width direction of the winder, on guides attached to the cross-directional beam.
In the method according to an advantageous aspect of the invention during winding the center of the partial web roll to be wound and thus the winding chucks move along a linear path as the diameter of the partial web roll increases. The movement path of the rider rolls is also linear and substantially co-linear with the movement path of the chucks. In the beginning of the winding by the rider rolls the partial web roll to be wound around the cores is supported and loaded as well as the partial web is tightened by the surface traction. As the winding progresses the rider rolls move substantially linearly in direction of the radius of the partial web roll to be wound supporting and loading the partial web roll to be wound until the end diameter of the partial web roll is achieved and simultaneously tightening the partial web to be wound by the surface traction.
By the invention is achieved a method and a device of winding a partial fiber web roll where exists no limit to the diameter of the partial web roll for using the rider rolls and thus disadvantages and problems of prior art arrangements can be eliminated. In addition the surface traction can be used effectively during the whole winding process and thus the problems relating to the center drive use can be avoided and a circumferential force that is freely controllable/adjustable independent of the diameter of the partial web roll by which the tightness of the partial web roll can effectively be controlled/adjusted.
According to an advantageous feature of the invention, winding up occurs utilizing the mass of the roll and, as the roll diameter increases, its center moves linearly at a certain angle in relation to the winding roll, whereby the position of the nip remains stationary. The winding stations are advantageously sturdily supported directly on the machine level floor or equivalent foundation.
According to an advantageous additional characteristic of the invention, the winding stations are directly supported on the floor, thus providing them an extremely good and stable support without massive support structures above the machine floor level.
Next, the invention will be described in more detail with reference to the figures of the enclosed drawing, to the details of which the invention is intended by no means to be narrowly limited.
a is an enlarged detailed schematic view of the arrangement of
In the winder, the winding position of the partial web rolls 15 to be wound is on the upper circumferential half of the winding roll 10 on winding stations 20. The device for winding i.e., the winder, comprises one or two winding rolls 10; in the example of
On both sides of the winder linearly up-and-down-movable cross-directional beams 34 are provided (only one being shown in the
During winding the center of the partial web roll 15 to be wound and thus the winding chucks 25 on the arms 22 move along a linear path D (shown in
In the beginning of the winding by the rider rolls 31, 32, see
The web roll 15 is created around a core 14 or equivalent winding spool which is connected from its center to the winding arm 22. As the web roll grows when the winding proceeds, the center, i.e. the core 14 of the growing web roll 15, moves linearly upwards, along the line D as shown in
The winding stations 20 according to
In connection with the example of
It should be understood that in the claims, the term winding cores includes winding spools.
The invention was described above referring to only some of its advantageous exemplifying embodiments to the details of which the invention is not intended to be narrowly limited but many modifications and variations are possible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12164937 | Apr 2012 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3604649 | Dorfel | Sep 1971 | A |
3792824 | Meyer et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3837593 | Dorfel | Sep 1974 | A |
4095755 | Snygg et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4105170 | Schönmeier | Aug 1978 | A |
4394990 | Kildal et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4440356 | Lang | Apr 1984 | A |
4550887 | Schonmeier | Nov 1985 | A |
4601435 | Tomma et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
5364044 | Welp et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5405099 | Hehner et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5732902 | Tomma et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5806783 | Turunen | Sep 1998 | A |
6007014 | Kruger | Dec 1999 | A |
6012673 | Kayser et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6170777 | Dorfel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6349897 | Sinkko et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6427940 | Koutonen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0711245 | May 1996 | EP |
12164937 | Apr 2012 | EP |
9855383 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for EP12164937 dated Aug. 8, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130277489 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |