The present invention relates to a method and a device to assist in the driving of a vehicle moving along a trajectory, in an environment containing at least one obstacle.
In the context of the present invention:
More particularly, although not exclusively, the present invention applies to an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane, which is approaching an airport in order to land or is moving away after a take-off.
The avoidance maneuvers considered in the present invention are therefore phases presenting high safety risks, due in particular to the proximity of one or more obstacles. Aggravating factors can be added to the criticality of this situation, such as poor environmental conditions or reduced maneuverability of the vehicle, which make it difficult to drive and which increase the risk of collision.
Currently, on transport airplanes in particular, there are onboard collision prevention systems which ensure that a safety distance is maintained between the airplane and an obstacle. However, the avoidance trajectories proposed by these usual prevention systems are not optimal in particular when it comes to the deviation (in terms of space and time) relative to the trajectory initially followed by the airplane.
Carrying out an avoidance maneuver of excessive amplitude can in particular lead to two types of major problems, namely:
Furthermore, in order to prevent emergency situations, such as, for example, a failure of a piloting for driving) system of the vehicle, a minimum safety separation with the obstacle must be ensured.
Moreover, the avoidance trajectory can be subject to external constraints such as performance limitations of the vehicle or traffic and movement rules in the environment.
The object of the present invention is to remedy the abovementioned drawbacks. It relates to a method for assisting in the driving of a vehicle in motion, in particular an aircraft and in particular a transport airplane, which is moving (on the ground or in flight) along an initial trajectory, in an environment containing at least one obstacle, fixed or moving, which must be avoided.
To this end, according to the invention, said method is noteworthy in that the following successive sequence of operations is carried out automatically and repetitively:
Thus, thanks to the invention, an optimum avoidance trajectory is automatically determined which enables the vehicle to avoid an obstacle, while enabling it to reach a particular destination, and this optimum avoidance trajectory is used to assist in the driving of the vehicle, as specified hereinbelow. The method according to the invention thus remedies the abovementioned drawbacks, in particular by providing an avoidance trajectory that is optimal when it comes to the deviation (in terms of space and time) relative to the trajectory initially followed by the vehicle.
Furthermore, since this method is implemented at least partially automatically, the workload of the pilot or pilots is not increased.
Furthermore, as specified hereinbelow, the invention makes it possible to indicate to the pilot, throughout the avoidance, the appropriate maneuver in order to both circumvent the obstacle and deviate as little as possible from the initial trajectory. Said device (which is therefore a trajectory indicator) evaluates at each instant the effect of a modification of the trajectory and thereby informs the pilot (or an automatic piloting system) as to the best maneuver to be carried out or as to the time remaining before carrying out a corrective action.
The present invention can be applied to any type of vehicle likely to be moving in space (on the ground or in flight), and in particular said initial trajectory and said avoidance trajectory can be flight trajectories or taxiing trajectories.
Advantageously, in step A/, a check is carried out to see if one of the following conditions is fulfilled:
Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, in the step B/a), said criterion CR is calculated using the following expression:
CR=R2+a1·D2+a2·T2
in which:
Moreover, advantageously:
in which:
Furthermore, advantageously, in the step B/c):
The present invention also relates to a device to assist in the driving of a vehicle in motion, in particular an aircraft and notably a transport airplane, which is moving (on the ground or in flight) along an initial trajectory, in an environment containing at least one fixed or moving obstacle, which must be avoided.
According to the invention, said device is noteworthy in that it comprises:
The driving assistance device according to the invention therefore enables a pilot (or an automatic piloting system) to control the trajectory (in flight or taxiing) of a vehicle, which is moving in an environment containing obstacles, the avoidance of these obstacles being necessary to ensure the safety of said vehicle, an obstacle possibly being immaterially a fixed element of the environment or another vehicle.
The present invention also relates to a vehicle, in particular an aircraft and notably a transport airplane, which includes a driving assistance device such as that mentioned above.
The figures of the appended drawing will give a clear understanding of how the invention can be implemented. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.
The device 1 according to the invention and diagrammatically represented in
The object of said device 1 is to assist in the driving of the vehicle A which is moving (on the ground or in flight) along an initial trajectory TI, in an environment containing at least one obstacle, fixed or moving, which must be avoided. In the context of the present invention, said obstacle can be immaterially a fixed element, in particular a building, or a moving object such as another vehicle for example, which must therefore be avoided by said vehicle A with a particular safety margin.
According to the invention, said device 1 which is on board the vehicle A comprises, as shown in
Said means 3 comprise integrated elements (not represented) to check whether one of the following conditions is fulfilled:
Furthermore, in a particular embodiment, said means 5 comprise integrated elements (not represented) for calculating the criterion CR, using the following expression:
CR=R2+a1·D2+a2·T2
in which:
The weighting values a1 and a2 are chosen empirically, so that the terms a1·D2 and a2·T2 remain positive and less than 1 for all the avoidance maneuvers that can be envisaged.
Said criterion CR is evaluated repetitively, and it evolves when a piloting action is performed. The mathematical formula for calculating this criterion CR is preferably adapted to the real situation of movement of the vehicle A and in particular to the type of trajectory, to the type of obstacle, to the type of vehicle and/or to the desired safety level.
Consequently, the device 1 according to the invention automatically determines an avoidance trajectory TE that enables the vehicle A to avoid an obstacle, while enabling it to reach a particular destination, and it uses this trajectory TE to assist in the driving of the vehicle A.
To do this, said means 11 can include:
The device 1 according to the invention thus indicates to the pilot, throughout the avoidance, the appropriate maneuver for both circumventing the obstacle and deviating as little as possible from the initial trajectory TI. To do this, this trajectory indicator (device 1) evaluates, at each instant, the effect of a modification of the trajectory and, by this means, informs the pilot (or the automatic piloting system 16) as to the best maneuver to be carried out or as to the time remaining before carrying out a corrective action.
In observing this principle, the reasons for modifying the initial trajectory TI are, in order of priority:
The optimum avoidance trajectory TE is defined as that which minimizes the criterion CR, which increases with:
In order to ensure a minimum deviation, the trajectory modification must take place at the most appropriate moment, that is, at the point of the future trajectory where the criterion CR will be minimized for an avoidance maneuver. Such a point is called “maximum sensitivity point” in the context of the present invention. The act of passing through maximum sensitivity points and applying the instructions specified hereinbelow at these points ensures that the avoidance carried out in this way as a whole will minimize said criterion CR. The maximum sensitivity points can be determined mathematically using the evaluation of the criterion CR.
If we use s to designate the curvilinear abscissa of the vehicle A on its current trajectory, and q to designate the turning of a control element of the vehicle A, for example of a control surface (lateral, direction or depth) of an aircraft in flight, which modifies the trajectory of the vehicle A, the maximum sensitivity points verify the following equation:
∂CR/∂s∂q=0
For this:
said means 8 comprise elements for determining a value E which verifies the following equation:
E=∂CR/∂s∂q
in which:
in which:
The control elements of the vehicle A, which are actuated for the implementation of the invention, are those for which, at the maximum sensitivity point, the following applies:
∂CR/∂q=0
In the context of the present invention, said initial trajectory TI and said avoidance trajectory TE can be taxiing trajectories.
However, in a preferred embodiment, said initial trajectory TI and said avoidance trajectory TE are flight trajectories, and said vehicle A is an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane, as represented in
The detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention of
A first variant embodiment of the invention (in its preferred mode) relates to airport approaches where the space for the movements in the horizontal plane is restricted, as represented in
The overall problem that exists for the situation of
The trajectory TI1 initially provided observes the traffic rules, but it may not observe the safety objectives. For this reason, this trajectory TI1 must be modified, which will have the effect of extending the insertion time of the airplane A on the approach axis L1. For traffic congestion reasons (arrival of the airplane O1 in particular), this additional time is limited. Compliance with this additional time limit makes it possible to avoid any risk of collision with the airplane O1.
The criterion CR1 taken into account in this situation is proportional to the square of the following values:
A weighting ai1 is applied only to the second term, and it varies according to the approach speed of the airplane A.
The following is therefore obtained:
CR1=tc12+ai1·ti12
The indications of the avoidance trajectory TE1 are, in this case, in order of priority:
A second variant embodiment of the invention (in its preferred mode) concerns the capturing of flight levels where the movements in the vertical plane are restricted, as represented in
The overall problem that exists for the situation of
The criterion CR2 taken into account in this situation is proportional to the square of the following values:
A weighting ai1, which is applied only to the second term, varies according to the vertical speed of the airplane A at the time of the start of the avoidance maneuver.
The following is therefore obtained:
CR2=tc22+ai2·ti22
The indications of the avoidance trajectory TE2 are, in this case, in order of priority:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 03714 | Jul 2008 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6208270 | Dunn | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6380870 | Conner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6546338 | Sainthuile et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6675095 | Bird et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6718236 | Hammer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6963291 | Holforty et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7030780 | Shiomi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061401 | Voos et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7714744 | Wichgers | May 2010 | B1 |
8090525 | Villiers | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020152029 | Sainthuile et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040239529 | Tran | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20080288169 | Meunier et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Robert Holdsworth, Jim Lambert, and Norbert Harle “Inflight Path Planning Replacing Pure Collision Avoidance, using ADS-B” IEEE AES Systems Magazine, Feb. 2001. |
Preliminary Search Report dated Jan. 22, 2009 w/ English translation. |
R. Holdsworth et al., “Inflight Path Planning Replacing Pure Collision Avoidance, using ADS-B.” IEEE, Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 16, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2001 pp. 27-32. |
A. Miura et al., “Aircraft Collision Avoidance with Potential Gradient—Ground-Basedavoidance for Horizontal Maneuvers,” Electronics & Communications in Japan, Part III—Fundamentalelectronic Science Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, US, vol. 78, No. 10, Oct. 1, 1995 pp. 104-113. |
M. Christodoulou et al., “Nonlinear mixed integer programming for aircraft collision avoidance in free flight,” IEEE, Electrotechnical Conference, 2004. MELECON 2004, Proceedings of the 12 th IEEE Mediterranean Dubrovnik, Croatia May 12-15, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 1, May 12, 2004 pp. 327-330. |
C. Carbone et al., “A Novel 3D Geometric Algorithm for Aircraft Autonomous Collision Avoidance,” IEEE, Decision and Control, 2006 45th IEEE Conference on IEEE PI, Dec. 1, 2006 pp. 1580-1585. |
J. Jackson, et al., “Curved Path Approaches and Dynamic Interpolation,” IEEE Proceedings of the Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, vol. Conf. 9, Oct. 15, 1990 pp. 404-408. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100174425 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |