This application is a U.S. National Phase under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2007/001021, filed Feb. 7, 2007, which claims priority to Italian Patent Application No. MI2006A000599, filed Mar. 30, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a method and devices therefor for controlling the normalized air-fuel ratio of an internal combustion engine, otherwise known, in technical terms, as Lambda.
In order to maximized the efficiency of catalytic converters in internal combustion engines, it is necessary to maintain the concentration of exhaust gases from said internal combustion engines in proximity to a preset value, which varies according to the type and the manufacturer of the various engines. It is known that maintaining said concentration of the gases in proximity to a desired value can be obtained by adopting a lambda control system.
The devices and methods currently utilized and available on the market for controlling the air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine are based on the use of sensors that produce a signal depending on the type of exhaust gas produced by the engine: rich or lean. Depending on the type of exhaust gas produced, the air-fuel ratio is modified in order to reach the air-fuel ratio established to maintain the concentration of the exhaust gases in proximity to a desired value.
This known method presents various drawbacks. The most relevant drawbacks are constituted of the possibility of the sensors failing to function and the imprecision of the measurements taken, which are based on the type of exhaust gases: rich or lean.
The aim of the present invention is to identify a method and devices therefor for controlling the air-fuel ratio of an internal combustion engine accurately and reliably, avoiding the use of sensors and effecting said control on each cylinder of said engine.
The present invention makes advantageous use of the ionization current developed during the combustion of the fuel in each cylinder of said engine, the number of ions in said ionization current being closely correlated with the air-fuel mix ratio in each cylinder of an internal combustion engine.
The present invention is based on the use of the ionization current released by a device, positioned on each cylinder of said engine. This ionization current is measured by a Control Unit, commonly utilized for the management of said combustion engines. Said Control Unit is equipped with a low-pass filter and electronic means which implement the method of the present invention. The aims and advantages of the present invention will better emerge in the description that follows which is made purely in the form of non-limiting examples in the plates enclosed, which refer to an internal combustion engine with a plurality of cylinders:
With reference to
With reference to
The subsequent phase (203) of the method relates to the determination of a value referred to in the present invention as Error Lambda, which is the difference between a predetermined sinusoidal signal (Vn), known by field technicians as the optimization operator for the performance of the catalytic converter, and the Average Lambda, as mentioned in the previous phase (202). The previous phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Error Lambda. This signal is supplied, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the Lambda values.
The subsequent phase (204) of the method relates to the determination of a value, referred to in the present invention as Lambda Correction, by means of the calculation of the integral, of Error Lambda, as mentioned in the previous phase (203). The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Lambda Correction. This signal is supplied, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to governing the checks on the Lambda values.
The method proceeds with the phase (205) which envisages the calculation of the value of the sum of said predetermined sinusoidal signal (Vn) and Lambda Correction. Said predetermined value is known by field technicians for the optimisation of the performance of the catalytic converters. The value of said sum is referred to in the present invention as Lambda to Inject. The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Lambda to Inject. This signal is supplied, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the Lambda values.
The method concludes with phase 206. Said phase envisages the determination, preferably by means of the Control Unit (5), of the quantity of fuel in each cylinder (2) of said engine (1) on the basis of the Lambda to Inject value, determined during the previous phase (205), with the sending of the signal therefor to the injectors (3).
Phase 302 relates to the application of a low-pass filter (6) to the signal representing the Average Lambda values calculated in the previous phase of the method. The signal obtained following the application of said low-pass filter is referred to in the present invention as Filtered Average Lambda.
The subsequent phases of the method according to the present embodiment (303) relates to the calculation of the difference between said predetermined sinusoidal signal (Vn) and Filtered Average Lambda, as per the previous phase (302). This predetermined value is known by field technicians for the optimization of the performance of the catalytic converter. The value determined in the present phase is referred to as Error Lambda. The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Error Lambda, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the Lambda values. The subsequent phase (304) of the method relates to the determination of a value referred to in the present invention as Lambda Correction, by means of the calculation of the Error Lambda integral, multiplied by a value between 0.1 and 1. The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Lambda Correction, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the Lambda values.
The method continues and concludes with phases 205 and 206, described in relation to
The subsequent phase (403) relates to the determination of the objective lambda value, known by field technicians, on the basis of a comparison with the predetermined values, also known by field technicians. The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing the objective lambda determined in said phase, which is referred to in the present invention as Objective Lambda. Said signal is supplied, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the Lambda values.
The subsequent phase 404 relates to the application of a low-pass filter (6) to the signal representing Objective Lambda. In the present invention, the signal obtained after the application of the low-pass filter (6) is called Filtered Objective Lambda.
The subsequent phase of the method according to the present embodiment (405) relates to the calculation of the difference between Filtered Average Lambda and Filtered Objective Lambda. The value determined in this phase is called Error Lambda. This phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Error Lambda, preferably to a portion of the Control Unit (5) which is dedicated to the check of lambda values.
The subsequent phase (406) of the method relates to the determination of a value, referred to in the present invention as Lambda Correction, by means of the calculation of the Error Lambda integral, multiplied by a value between 0.01 and 1. The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing Lambda Correction, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the Lambda values.
The method continues with another phase (407) which envisages the determination of the ratio of the air-fuel to be injected into the cylinders (2) of said engine (1), referred to as Lambda to Inject, on the basis of the calculation of the sum of Objective Lambda and Lambda Correction. The phase also envisages the supply of the signal representing the value Lambda to Inject, preferably, to a portion of the Control Unit (5) dedicated to checking the lambda values.
The method continues and concludes with phase 206, described in relation to
The description above and the plates enclosed illustrate embodiments of the present invention, are provided purely in the form of non-limiting examples within the scope of protection as per the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2006A0599 | Mar 2006 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/001021 | 2/7/2007 | WO | 00 | 4/1/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/112803 | 10/11/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4962741 | Cook et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5769049 | Nytomt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5811670 | Nolte et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6029627 | VanDyne | Feb 2000 | A |
6505500 | Elgh et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6820418 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7925420 | Forte et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20040084026 | Zhu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20100070157 | Forte et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
198 01 815 | Jul 1999 | DE |
103 51 133 | May 2004 | DE |
07229443 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07310573 | Nov 1995 | JP |
WO 9837322 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9936689 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 0061932 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090326786 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |