In this publication, the following abbreviations are used.
In packet-switched telecommunications systems, it is often advantageous if the packets being transmitted are classified in different service classes (CoS) according, on the one hand, to the requirements of the applications using the telecommunications service and, on the other, to the kind of service-quality agreements that the telecommunications service provider (Service Provider) has made with its customers. For example, in a telephone application (Voice over Internet), it is essential for the data-transfer delay and the variation of the delay to remain below the permitted limit values. The permitted limit values are often defined in a service-quality agreement. However, when downloading www pages, for example, the data-transfer delay and its variation are significantly less critical quantities.
It is often wished to monitor and limit the speed properties of a traffic flow formed from packets to be transferred. Such a situation occurs, for example, if it is wished to reserve a specific portion of the data-transmission capacity of a transfer link for a specific customer, so that the traffic of the customer in question will not be permitted to exceed the transmission capacity reserved for him. The traffic flow being examined thus consists of packets representing the traffic of the customer in question, which can represent differ service classes. In other words, a virtual transfer link is formed to the customer in question, the transmission capacity of which is part of the capacity of the physical transfer link used for the implementation. A speed property can refer to, for example, the mean speed of the traffic (CIR), the burst size (CBS), by which the mean speed can be momentarily exceeded, or the momentary speed (PIR). Taken more generally, the traffic flow can consist of, for example, packets to be routed to a specific transfer link, packets with a specific source address and sent by a specific end user, or packets that belong to a specific class of service (CoS) and are to be routed to a specific transfer link. In the rest of this publication, a system, which can be used to monitor and limit the speed properties of a traffic flow, will be referred to as a ‘shaper’ and the operation, in which the speed properties of a traffic flow are monitored and limited, will be referred to as ‘shaping’.
The following examines a system, to which two traffic flows V1 and V2 arrive. The traffic flow V1 arriving in the system represents delay-critical traffic (e.g., Voice over Internet), for which a greatest permitted delay and delay variation have been defined. The traffic flow V2 arriving in the system represents traffic that is considerably less delay-critical than that of flow V1. The traffic flows V1 and V2 are multiplexed to a common transfer link S leaving the system. Multiplexing is performed on the basis of priority, in such a way that the packets representing the traffic flow V1 are forwarded with a higher priority than the packets representing the traffic flow V2, because traffic flow V1 represents delay-critical traffic. It is wished to monitor and limit the speed properties of the aggregate flow A being transmitted to the transfer link S.
VTS_CIRnext=max(t−CBS/CIR,VTS_CIRed)+PKSed/CIR, (1)
and
VTS_PIRnext=max(t,VTS_PIRed)+PKSed/PIR, (2)
in which t is the time, PKS is the size of the packet in bits, the sub-index ‘next’ refers to the next packet and the sub-index ‘ed’ refers to the packet, the first bit of which is transferred past point MP at the moment t.
When all the speed properties are taken into account, the earliest permitted moment (VTS), when the next packet can begin to be transferred past point MP, is obtained from equation 3.
VTS=max(VTS_CIR,VTS_PIR). (3)
The multiplexer SP only selects the next packet to be transferred, once enough time has elapsed that t[$]≧VTS.
A problem in the system shown in
Defects of the prior art disclosed above may be eliminated by creating an entirely new type of method and equipment for performing flow shaping that retains the quality of service in packet-switched telecommunications. A novel method and equipment for performing shaping as described herein may avoid the aforementioned problems relating to the prior art.
One aspect described herein is directed to perform flow shaping that maintains service quality in a packet-switched telecommunication system. This aspect features transferring digital information as constant or variable-length packets, wherein the packets arrive in the system as at least two separate traffic flows, the packets arriving in the system are forwarded from the system along one or more transfer links, wherein as a result of the forwarding of packet representing a specific first traffic flow arriving in the system, at least one such variable is updated, which is also updated as a result of the forwarding of packets representing a specific second traffic flow arriving in the system, and a packet representing the first said traffic flow is forwarded independently of the said variable, and the earliest permitted moment of forwarding a packet representing the said second traffic flow is defined, at least partly, on the basis on the said variable.
The novel equipment described herein is, in turn, characterized by what is stated in the characterizing portion of claim 5.
The foregoing will be apparent from the following more particular description of example embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
A description of example embodiments of the invention follows.
Traditionally, flow-shaping machinery operates in such a way that, in connection with the traffic flows being monitored, the corresponding VTS values are updated, for example, as shown in equations 1, 2, and 3 and, if necessary, the forwarding of the packets relating to the traffic flows being monitored is delayed. The method according to the embodiments is characterized by the fact that, in connection with one or more specific traffic flows, the shaping machinery operates in such a way that it only updates the VTS values, but does not delay the packets representing the relevant traffic flows. The delaying performed on the basis of the relevant VTS values is applied to the forwarding of packets representing the other traffic flows.
The operation of the method according to the embodiments will be examined with the aid of one system according to some embodiments, shown in
The method described herein may also be used when some other multiplexer than one based on priority is used, for example, a weight-coefficient-based multiplexer (WFQ, Weighted Fair Queuing) [1].
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20031524 | Oct 2003 | FI | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/574,006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,194,542, entitled “Method and Equipment for Performing Flow Shaping that Maintains Service Quality in Packet-Switched Telecommunications”, by inventors Janne Väänänen and Mikko Laulainen, which is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/FI2004/000613, filed Oct. 14, 2004, published in English, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 or 365 to Finland, Application No. 20031524, filed Oct. 17, 2003, now Patent No. 20031524. The entire teachings of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6023456 | Chapman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6449255 | Waclawsky | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6532213 | Chiussi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549514 | Kilkki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6606301 | Muller et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6965566 | Kawasaki et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7061861 | Mekkittikul et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
20010029457 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020107908 | Dharanikota | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020167957 | Brandt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030099200 | Kiremidjian et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030165116 | Fallon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030165148 | Bishard | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174650 | Shankar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030223369 | Anderson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040066743 | Shimojo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100967 | Robotham et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105393 | Ronneke et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 124 356 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 199 851 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 227 624 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 345 365 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 372 306 | Dec 2003 | EP |
WO 02063837 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Goyal, P., et al., “Start-time Fair Queuing: A Scheduling Algorithm for Integrated Services Packet Switching Networks,” pp. 1-12, Proceedings of SIGCOMM 1996. |
Blake, et al., “An Architecture for Differentiated Services,” RFC 2475, Dec. 1998, pp. 1-36. |
Stattenberger, G., et al., “Performance evaluation of a Linux DiffServ implementation,” Computer Communications 25 (2002), pp. 1195-1213, Elsevier. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/FI2004/000613, date of mailing Feb. 1, 2005, 7 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/FI2004/000613, date of mailing Feb. 1, 2005, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120300625 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10574006 | US | |
Child | 13486976 | US |