The present invention relates to a method for performing flow shaping that maintains service quality in packet-switched telecommunications.
The invention also relates to equipment for performing flow shaping that maintains service quality in packet-switched telecommunications.
In this publication, the following abbreviations are used in the depiction of both the prior art and the invention:
In packet-switched telecommunications systems, it is often advantageous if the packets being transmitted are classified indifferent service classes (CoS) according, on the one hand, to the requirements of the applications using the telecommunications service and, on the other, to the kind of service-quality agreements that the telecommunications service provider (Service Provider) has made with its customers. For example, in a telephone application (Voice over Internet), it is essential for the data-transfer delay and the variation of the delay to remain below the permitted limit values. The permitted limit-values are often defined in a service-quality agreement. However, when downloading www pages, for example, the data-transfer delay and its variation are significantly less critical quantities.
It is often wished to monitor and limit the speed properties of a traffic flow formed from packets to be transferred. Such a situation occurs, for example, if it is wished to reserve a specific portion of the data-transmission capacity of a transfer link for a specific customer, so that the traffic of the customer in question will not be permitted to exceed the transmission capacity reserved for him. The traffic flow being examined thus consists of packets representing the traffic of the customer in question, which can represent differ service classes. In other words, a virtual transfer link is formed to the customer in question, the transmission capacity of which is part of the capacity of the physical transfer link used for the implementation. A speed property can refer to, for example, the mean speed of the traffic (CW), the burst size (CBS), by which the mean speed can be momentarily exceeded, or the momentary speed (PIR). Taken more generally, the traffic flow can consist of, for example, packets to be routed to a specific transfer link, packets with a specific source address and sent by a specific end user, or packets that belong to a specific class of service (CoS) and are to be routed to a specific transfer link. In the rest of this publication, a system, which can be used to monitor and limit the speed properties of a traffic flow, will be referred to as a ‘shaper’ and the operation, in which the speed properties of a traffic flow are monitored and limited, will be referred to as ‘shaping’.
The following examines a system, to which two traffic flows V1 and V2 arrive. The traffic flow V1 arriving in the system represents delay-critical traffic (e.g., Voice over Internet), for which a greatest permitted delay and delay variation have been defined. The traffic flow V2 arriving in the system represents traffic that is considerably less delay-critical than that of flow V1. The traffic flows V1 and V2 are multiplexed to a common transfer link S leaving the system. Multiplexing is performed on the basis of priority, in such a way that the packets representing the traffic flow V1 are forwarded with a higher priority than the packets representing the traffic flow V2, because traffic flow V1 represents delay-critical traffic. It is wished to monitor and limit the speed properties of the aggregate flow A being transmitted to the transfer link S.
VTS—CIRnext=max(t-CBS/CIR,VTS—CIRed)+PKSed/CIR, (1)
and
VRS—PIRnext=max(t,VTS—PIRed)+PKSed/PIR, (2)
in which t is the time, PKS is the size of the packet in bits, the sub-index ‘next’ refers to the next packet and the sub-index ‘ed’ refers to the packet, the first bit of which is transferred past point MP at the moment t.
When all the speed properties are taken into account, the earliest permitted moment (VTS), when the next packet can begin to be transferred past point MP, is obtained from equation 3.
VTS=max(VTS—CIR,VTS—PIR). (3)
The multiplexer SP only selects the next packet to be transferred, once enough time has elapsed that t [$]≧VTS.
A problem in the system shown in
The present invention is intended to eliminate the defects of the prior art disclosed above and for this purpose create an entirely new type of method and equipment for performing flow shaping that retains the quality of service in packet-switched telecommunications. The aim of the invention is a method and equipment for performing shaping in such a way as to avoid the aforementioned problems relating to the prior art.
One aspect of the invention is directed to perform flow shaping that maintains service quality in a packet-switched telecommunication system. This aspect of the invention features transferring digital information as constant or variable-length packets, wherein the packets arrive in the system as at least two separate traffic flows, the packets arriving in the system are forwarded from the system along one or more transfer links, wherein as a result of the forwarding of packet representing a specific first traffic flow arriving in the system, at least one such variable is updated, which is also updated as a result of the forwarding of packets representing a specific second traffic flow arriving in the system, and a packet representing the first said traffic flow is forwarded independently of the said variable, and the earliest permitted moment of forwarding a packet representing the said second traffic flow is defined, at least partly, on the basis on the said variable.
Another aspect of the invention is directed to an equipment for performing flow shaping that maintains service quality in a packet-switched telecommunication system, in which the equipment includes means for receiving constant or variable-length packets carrying digital information, means for classifying a packet arriving in the system as representing one of the traffic flows arriving in the system, and means for forwarding packets to an outgoing link or links, wherein the equipment further includes means, with the aid of which it is possible to update, as a result of the forwarding of a packet representing a first specific traffic flow, such a variable that can also be updated as a result of the forwarding of a packet representing a specific second traffic flow, and with the aid of which means a packet representing the first said variable, and with the aid of which means it is possible to define the earliest permitted moment, at which a packet representing the second said traffic flow can be forwarded, at least partly on the basis of the said variable.
In the following, the invention is examined in greater detail with the aid of examples according to the accompanying figures.
The theoretical basis of the method according to the invention will become apparent from the following examination.
Traditionally, flow-shaping machinery operates in such a way that, in connection with the traffic flows being monitored, the corresponding VTS values are updated, for example, as shown in equations 1, 2, and 3 and, if necessary, the forwarding of the packets relating to the traffic flows being monitored is delayed. The method according to the invention is characterized by the fact that, in connection with one or more specific traffic flows, the shaping machinery operates in such a way that it only updates the VTS values, but does not delay the packets representing the relevant traffic flows. The delaying performed on the basis of the relevant VTS values is applied to the forwarding of packets representing the other traffic flows.
The operation of the method according to the invention will be examined with the aid of one system according to the invention, shown in
The method according to the invention can also be used when some other multiplexer than one based on priority is used, for example, a weight-coefficient-based multiplexer (WFQ, Weighted Fair Queuing) [1].
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20031524 | Oct 2003 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2004/000613 | 10/14/2004 | WO | 00 | 3/29/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/039124 | 4/28/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6023456 | Chapman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6449255 | Waclawsky | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6532213 | Chiussi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549514 | Kilkki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6606301 | Muller et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6965566 | Kawasaki et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7061861 | Mekkittikul et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
20010029457 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020167957 | Brandt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030099200 | Kiremidjian et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030165116 | Fallon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030165148 | Bishard | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030223369 | Anderson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040066743 | Shimojo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100967 | Robotham et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105393 | Ronneke et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 124 356 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 199 851 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 227 624 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 345 365 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 372 306 | Dec 2003 | EP |
WO-02063837 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070002741 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |