The present invention relates to methods and compositions for controlling proppant flow through a wellbore, and more particularly relates, in one embodiment, to methods and compositions for controlling proppant flow through a wellbore after proppant fracturing.
There are a number of procedures and applications that involve the formation of a temporary seal or plug while other steps or processes are performed, where the seal or plug must be later removed. Often such seals or plugs are provided to temporarily block a flow pathway or inhibit the movement of fluids or other materials, such as flowable particulates, in a particular direction for a short period of time, when later movement or flow is desirable.
The recovery of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations often involves applications and/or procedures employing coatings or plugs. In instances where operations must be conducted at remote locations, namely deep within the earth, equipment and materials can only be manipulated at a distance. One such operation concerns perforating and/or well completion operations incorporating filter cakes and the like as temporary coatings.
Generally, perforating a well involves a special gun that shoots several relatively small holes in the casing. The holes are formed in the side of the casing opposite the producing zone. These perforations, or communication tunnels, pierce the casing or liner and the cement around the casing or liner. The perforations go through the casing and the cement and a short distance into the producing formation. Formations fluids, which include oil and gas, flow through these perforations and into the well.
The most common perforating gun uses shaped charges, similar to those used in armor-piercing shells. A high-speed, high-pressure jet penetrates the steel casing, the cement, and the formation next to the cement. Other perforating methods include bullet perforating, abrasive jetting, or high-pressure fluid jetting.
The characteristics and placement of the communication tunnels can have significant influence on the productivity of the well. Technology has been developed which eliminates the need for perforating guns and enables significantly more controlled perforation through the use of fluid conduits installed within casings. These fluid conduits may be extended out from the casing to contact a formation wall, thereby forming “perforations” at desired locations along the length of the casing. Temporary plugs in the conduits form fluid barriers, and the conduits are pushed out from the casing via fluid pressure. The plugs may be made of a porous filter structure on which a degradable barrier material is coated. After the fluid conduits are extended, the degradable material may be removed, thereby allowing the flow of fluids through the filter structure. This technology, known as TELEPERF™ from Baker Hughes Inc, is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,527,103 and 7,461,699, each incorporated by reference herein its entirety.
In some instances, it may be necessary or desirable to fracture a formation to enable or promote the flow of fluids therethrough. For example, in low-permeability reservoirs, it may be beneficial to fracture the well formation and inject proppants into the fractures to stimulate the flow of fluids (such as oil, gas, water, and the like) through the formation. When hydraulic fracturing is performed, the viscous fracturing fluids mixed with proppant are flowed into the formation through the casing and associated perforations. However, filters in the above-described TELEPERF™ devices may obstruct or impede the high-viscosity fluids and proppants utilized in hydraulic fracturing from entering the formation.
Accordingly, hydraulic fracturing may be accomplished in TELEPERF™ devices by temporarily plugging the telescoping conduits to inhibit the flow of fluid therethrough. Hydraulic pressure telescopes the flow conduits outward, and the temporary plugs may then be removed from the flow conduits via an acidic solution. High-viscosity fluids and proppants may then be injected to fracture the subterranean reservoir. This technology, known as TELEFRAC™ from Baker Hughes Inc, is described in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/723,983, which is herein incorporated by reference its entirety.
Although the TELEFRAC™ method described above enables proppant fracturing through the TELEPERF™ tunnels, the system does not provide for a filter structure through which the formation fluids may be returned to the well surface. It may be desirable to filter the formation fluids in order to control proppant flow back into the wellbore. Ensuring that the proppant remains in the fracture will increase the fracture integrity in the near wellbore region and maintain higher productivity that results from well fracturing.
There is provided, in one non-limiting form, a method for extracting well fluids from a fractured hydrocarbon formation while controlling the flow of proppant back through the wellbore. The hydrocarbon formation has disposed within it a pipe having orifices through at least a region of its wall, and telescoping flow conduits, pathways, channels, passages, outlets, or the like situated within the orifices in a retracted position within the pipe. The telescoping flow conduits contain porous objects disposed within them to control the flow of proppant and sand from the formation. The hydraulic fracturing method includes extending the telescoping flow conduits radially outward from the pipe in the direction of the wellbore wall via an extension fluid. Hydraulic fracturing fluid may then be injected into the subterranean reservoir via the pipe and the telescoping flow conduits. The porous objects are then injected into the telescoping flow conduits to control the flow of proppant and formation sand into the wellbore during production of the formation.
In another non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure, a system or apparatus may be provided for use in well completions. The system may include a pipe, such as a conductor pipe, a casing, a tubing, a liner, or the like. Through the wall of the pipe are disposed telescoping flow conduits made of at least two sleeves. In one exemplary embodiment, the first sleeve is attached to the pipe wall, and the second sleeve is disposed within the first sleeve and is moveable relative to the first sleeve. The second sleeve may contain an acid-soluble plug which temporarily blocks, inhibits, or prevents flow through the sleeve. The inhibited flow enables the second sleeve to be moved relative to the first sleeve via hydraulic pressure. After the plug is dissolved using an acidic solution, a porous ball may be inserted into the second sleeve to serve as a filter or a sand control screen during production of the well.
In accordance with a present embodiment, an oil well casing or liner may contain pre-formed perforations, or holes, therethrough. Further, installed in each perforation may be a moveable fluid conduit or pathway which enables fluid communication between the interior and the exterior of the casing or liner. For example, the fluid conduit may be several generally cylindrical conduits arranged coaxially with a limited range of motion relative to each other along the commonly shared axis, e.g. in a telescoping configuration.
The flow conduits or pathways may further contain temporary plugs which inhibit or prevent the flow of fluid through the conduits. The moveable flow conduits or pathways may be telescoped out from the casing or liner into the wellbore annulus via fluid pressure within the casing or liner. That is, as fluid is pumped into the casing, the temporary plugs inhibit the fluid from exiting the casing via the flow conduits. Rather, as the pressure inside the casing increases, the flow conduits are pushed outward from the casing. Optimally, the flow conduits contact the wellbore wall, thereby forming a flow pathway through the annulus from the interior of the casing to the formation. In this manner, the described structure may be used as a completion tubular to avoid using a cementing and perforation process. After the assembly is in place across the producing zone location, the temporary plugs may be dissolved using an acidic solution.
A hydraulic fracturing fluid may then be pumped through the casing, out the flow conduits, and into the formation. The fluid may fracture the formation, thereby increasing its permeability and stimulating production. In addition, proppants may be used in the fluid to keep the fracture open after the procedure has been completed. In an exemplary embodiment, porous media may then be disposed within the flow conduits to inhibit return of the proppants during production of the formation.
The well completion system will now be described more specifically with respect to the figures, where in
Flow conduits 26 such as that shown in
The flow conduits 26 contain temporary plugs 46 made of a soluble substance having low permeability and high strength. For example, the plug 46 may be Indiana limestone having an acid solubility greater than 70% and permeability of less than 10 mD. Although the present disclosure refers to the soluble substance of the plugs 46 as limestone, it should be understood that other materials having similar solubility, permeability, and strength may be utilized in the disclosed methods and systems. In a non-limiting embodiment, the plug 46 may be pre-formed and secured within one or more of the sleeves 28-31. For example, the plug 46 may be inserted into the sleeve 28 and abutted against the inside of a flange 48. In other embodiments, the plug 46 may be force fit into one or more of the sleeves 28-31 or disposed at an end of one of the sleeves 28-31 via a threaded hollow cap.
Once the casing 10 is placed or positioned in the wellbore 14, a fluid 50 may be pumped through the casing 10 and the conduits 26, as shown in
An acidic solution, such as dicarboxylic acid, may then be pumped into the casing 10 to dissolve the plugs 46, thereby forming flow paths 54 through the annulus 24 between the casing 10 and the formation 16, as shown in
In a non-limiting embodiment, the fluid 50 used to extend the conduits 26 may also be utilized to dissolve the plugs 46. That is, the fluid 50 may be an acidic solution having a low enough chemical reaction rate with the limestone plugs 46 that the plugs 46 begin slowly dissolving while the hydraulic pressure of the extension fluid 50 pushes the conduits 26 outward toward the wellbore wall 18. After the conduits 26 are extended out to touch the face of the reservoir 16, the acidic fluid 50 may continue to be pumped into the casing 10 to substantially dissolve the plugs 46. It should be understood that the method herein is considered successful if the plugs 46 dissolve sufficiently to open up the flow conduits 26 enough to enable flow of viscous fracturing fluids and proppants therethrough.
After the well is fractured, porous objects 56 may be introduced into the casing 10 and pumped into the fluid conduits 26 via a pressurized fluid flow, as illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, the porous objects 56 may be generally spherical balls having a diameter approximately equivalent to that of the inner diameter 34 of the sleeve 28. The balls may be composed of numerous beads (not shown) joined together to form the porous objects 56. That is, high-strength beads (i.e., stainless steel, alloy, ceramic, and the like) may be bonded together via, for example, sintering or gluing, to form the generally spherical porous balls 56. The beads may, in one embodiment, be from about 10 mesh (2000 μm) to about 100 mesh (149 μm). Additionally, the beads may be a generally uniform size or may be a variety of sizes.
In a non-limiting embodiment, the porous objects 56 may be carried into the extended flow conduits 26 via a flush fluid 58, such as, for example, brine, potassium chloride solution, non-crosslinked polymer fluid, diesel, foam, or the like. The flush fluid 58 may be pumped through the casing 10 and into the flow conduits 26 with sufficient force to push the porous objects 56 into the fluid conduits 26. The porous objects 56 may be blocked from escaping the flow conduits 26 by the flanges 48 in the sleeves 28.
As the flush fluid 58 continues to flow into the casing 10 of
Further features of the sleeve 28 include one or more tabs 70 protruding radially outward from the exterior of the sleeve 28. These tabs 70 cooperate with an internal surface 72 of a flange 74 protruding radially inward from the interior of the sleeve 29. Abutment of the tabs 70 with the flange 74 limits movement of the sleeve 28 relative to the sleeve 29.
In addition, concentric rings 76 protrude radially outward from the exterior of the sleeve 28. These rings 76 may have a buttress-type profile wherein the leading edge of each ring 76 is beveled, for example, at about 30 degrees relative to the exterior of the sleeve 28, and the trailing edge is generally perpendicular to the exterior of the sleeve 28. When flow conduit 26 telescopes outward, the sleeve 28 moves along the axis 44 relative to the sleeve 29, and the beveled edges of the rings 76 move past the internal surface 72 of the flange 74. The perpendicular edge of the rings 76 then abuts an external surface 78 of the flange 74, thereby blocking the sleeve 28 from moving the opposite direction along the axis 44 relative to the sleeve 29.
The tabs 70 and rings 76 on the sleeve 28 cooperate with the flange 74 on the sleeve 29 to enable limited movement of the sleeve 28 relative to the sleeve 29 in only one direction along the axis 44. That is, when the sleeve 28 is expanded outward from the sleeve 29 along the axis 44, the flange 74 essentially locks the sleeve 28 in place by limiting movement in one direction via abutment with the tabs 70 and in the other direction via abutment with the trailing edge of the rings 76. The sleeves 29-31 may include similar features to enable telescopic expansion and prevent collapse of the flow conduit 26.
It will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to the foregoing specification without departing from the broader spirit or scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. For example, specific materials, fluids, acidic solutions, and combinations thereof falling within the claimed parameters, but not specifically identified or tried in a particular composition, are anticipated to be within the scope of this invention. Additionally, various components and methods not specifically described herein may still be encompassed by the following claims.
The words “comprising” and “comprises” as used throughout the claims is to be interpreted as “including but not limited to”. The present invention may suitably comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the elements disclosed and may be practiced in the absence of an element not disclosed. For example, in one non-limiting embodiment, a pipe used in well completions may consist of or alternatively consist essentially of an interior space, an outer surface, at least one flow conduit and a porous object disposed within the flow conduit, as described in the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 12/723,983, filed Mar. 15, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4285398 | Zandmer et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
5425424 | Reinhardt et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
6805198 | Huang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7461699 | Richard et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7527103 | Huang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7703520 | Dusterhoft | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8079416 | Parker | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20030029621 | Haynes | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050284633 | Richard | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080035349 | Richard | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080296024 | Huang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
R. Weinberger, et al., “Tensile Properties of Rocks in Four-Point Beam Tests Under Confining Pressure,” Rock Mechanics, 1994, pp. 435-442. |
T. Huang, et al., “Reaction Rate and Fluid Loss: The Keys to Wormhole Initiation and Propagation in Carbonate Acidizing,” SPE 65400, SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Feb. 18-21, 1997, vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 287-292. |
O. Katz, et al., “Evaluation of Mechanical Rock Properties Using a Schmidt Hammer,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 2000, vol. 37, pp. 723-728. |
T. Huang, et al., “Carbonate Matrix Acidizing Fluids at High Temperatures: Acetic Acid, Chelating Agents or Long-Chained Carboxylic Acids,” SPE 82268, SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 13-14, 2003. |
P. Nguyen, et al., “Remediation of Production Loss Due to Proppant Flowback in Existing Wellbores,” SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 102626, Moscow, Russia, Oct. 3-6, 2006. |
P. Nguyen, et al., “Remediation of Proppant Flowback—Laboratory and Field Studies,” European Formation Damage Conference, SPE 106108, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, May 30-Jun. 1, 2007. |
J. Trela, et al., “Controlling Proppant Flowback to Maintain Fracture Conductivity and Minimize Workovers: Lessons Learned from 1,500 Fracturing Treatments,” SPE Int'l Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, SPE 112461, Lafayette, Louisiana, Feb. 13-15, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110220362 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12723983 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 12814630 | US |