The present invention relates to a method and means for mounting wind turbines at different levels of a supporting column.
A major issue in regard to wind turbines is the likelihood of damage to the turbine and its tower during storms. The preferred solution has been to engineer constructions so massive as to be likely to withstand historically experienced storms. This solution has not eliminated catastrophic failure. Moreover, it resulted in prohibitive setup costs. Thus wind power, as currently in use throughout the world, involves very high start-up costs. Massive foundations and towers are required as well as cranes. As a result, wind power is not competitive with fossil fuel power generation systems.
Wind speed usually increases and turbulence decreases with height from the ground. Since 1904, engineers have proposed variable level turbines that would allow for simplified installation and maintenance.
In 1904, U.S. Pat. No. 756,216 (Crunican) disclosed a wind turbine, with a “vertically adjusted . . . wind-wheel and attachments” which will “automatically lower themselves when acted upon by wind traveling at a rate of speed in excess of that necessary to operate.”
In 1939, U.S. Pat. No. 2,177,801 (Erren) disclosed a “wind driven generator mounted on a telescopic mounting for adjustment n respect to height.”
In 1981, U.S. Pat. No. 4,266,911 (Helm et al.) disclosed “a wind power plant . . . including a power house and vanes rotatable by the wind . . . assembled on the ground . . . the power system is then elevated . . . along the tower . . . with cables and a winch.”
In January 1982, U.S. Pat. No. 4,311,434 (Abe) disclosed “a freely liftable . . . nacelle which is fitted with a propeller wind wheel . . . the nacelle can be lowered to the ground to protect . . . from breakage due to the force of the wind. Required maintenance and inspection—of the nacelle and replacement of rotor blades—can be safely carried out on the ground.”
In August 1982, U.S. Pat. No. 4,342,539 (Potter) disclosed a “retractable wind machine . . . . The tiltable windmill rotating mast is a telescoping tower, which is retracted into storage mode, usually during dangerous windstorms.”
In October 1986, U.S. Pat. No. 4,616,974 (Andruszkiw et al.) disclosed “a wind driven power generating apparatus . . . automatically vertically adjustable depending upon the wind velocity . . . the wind impinging upon helical vanes . . . when the wind velocity is high the power generating apparatus is automatically retracted into a well.”
In March 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,357,549 (Brennan et al.) disclosed “a method for servicing wind generating towers . . . attaching a guide rail climbing lifting platform . . . utilizing said platform to raise and lower wind generating turbine components.”
In June 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,408,575 (Yoshida et al.) disclosed “a horizontal axis type wind turbine having a tower mounted on a base, a nacelle mounted on said tower, and a rotor supported by said nacelle . . . . A method of lifting and mounting a nacelle of a horizontal axis type wind turbine . . . said nacelle is penetrated by said tower before lifting; lifting said nacelle along said tower with a plurality of tensile members vertically going through the interior of said tower and a plurality of pulleys provided in said tower.”
In 2008, U.S. Pat. No. 7,442,009 (Anel) disclosed “a wind turbine tower; a sleeve member slidably coupled to the tower; a wind turbine attached to the sleeve member. A gear motor coupled to the sleeve member . . . drives the gear in a clockwise direction to raise the sleeve member and the attached wind turbine toward the upper end of the tower. A locking mechanism . . . secures the sleeve member at an upper end of the tower and prevents the sleeve member from rotating with respect to the tower. The wind turbine is lowered so that the blades are received within a protective chamber.”
In 1970, U.S. Pat. No. 3,514,918 (Archer et al.) disclosed a method of pre-stressing a concrete column or utility pole. It uses interlocking telescoping sections, which are reinforced by pumping concrete in. Thus the tower is a permanent structure and built using telescoping sections of decreasing diameter
In 1981, U.S. Pat. No. 4,272,929 (Hanson) disclosed “a tower for a wind generator, made up of a plurality of segments where each segment fits into the one below it and is adjustable relative that lower segment. The lower segment is anchored in the ground . . . when cement is poured into the hole to anchor the tower, the cement flows up into the interior of the tower to give additional support.” While a tripod was used for the raising of the structure, it did not allow the rapid raising and lowering of the turbine in relation to the expected strength of the wind or for maintenance of the turbine. The tower was a permanent structure.
In 1997, WO 9721621 (Tymon) disclosed a method of raising a load, such as a turbine, upon a tower without the need of relatively heavy and expensive lifting apparatus. Thus the load is to remain in place at the top of the tower; although it may be lowered for maintenance. The tower had a traditional tapering structure and was a permanent structure.
In 2001, U.S. Published Application No. 2002047277 (Willis et al.) disclosed a tower with a sled movably mounted on guide rails. When the wind turbine has been positioned at the upper end of the tower, a horizontally slidable platform moves the wind turbine from the sled to the upper end of the tower so that the wind turbine may be secured to the upper end of the tower. A “self-propelled and steerable vehicle” may transport the sled from one tower location to another. While this system was designated for the management of wind farms, it did not include variable level turbine operation in relation to wind conditions and was a permanent structure.
In 2005, WO 2005028781 (Hiel et al.) disclosed a composite tower bearing one permanently emplaced wind turbine. The tower is built with telescoping sections of decreasing diameter, so that the turbines cannot be raised and lowered. Thus, this tower is a permanent structure.
In 2008, U.S. Published Application No. 20080078128 (Livingstone et al) disclosed a system for lifting a turbine upon a tower. The turbine is to remain affixed at the top of the tower unrelatedly to wind conditions with the tower itself being a permanent structure.
In 2011, U.S. Published Application No. 20110271608 (Egan et al.) disclosed how a tower will be built anchored to the ground. A lighter section is attached which will pivot upon the tower, thus raising the power units such as a turbine or other apparatus. The system allows for lowering the apparatus affixed to the top section for maintenance. However, lowering the turbine to the ground is not a rapid operation. It won't allow for lowering on a regular basis, such as when meteorological conditions dictate. The tower is a permanent structure.
In 2012, DE 102010031081 (Richert) disclosed a method of raising and lowering a horizontal axis turbine. The position of the turbine on the column will be automatically computer-controlled. This tower was not movable to another location. The invention does not discuss the method of building such a column, but allows the turbine to be lowered. Without previous removal of the blades, however, the turbine cannot be lowered all the way to the ground. To allow survival under serious storm conditions, the diameter of the column is unavoidably much greater than the smaller diameter that the present invention allows. Like some of the previous disclosures, the Richert concept allows the turbine to be lowered but not all the way to the ground without prior removal of the blades.
Most of the preceding inventions are plans for industrial turbines. A primary objective of this invention, by contrast, is to simplify the use of small turbines for: personal use by homeowners, isolated cabins in wooded areas and/or emergency situations.
A rapidly retractable wind turbine system can be easily protected from storm damage. A wind turbine column is built using a tripod by joining together vertically positioned pipe elements. Thus a column is safely built.
The axis bearing the turbine is raised upon the column and can be rapidly lowered to the level appropriate for stronger than usual winds, storm situations, and/or turbine servicing. The invention was made with the intent to facilitate the installation and use of different models of vertical axis wind turbines. It may, however, also be used to facilitate the installation of lights or horizontal axis windmills.
As discussed above, numerous inventions have disclosed methods of changing the level of a turbine to survive storms or to use wind energy more efficiently. However, said methods have so far been viewed as too cumbersome to be acceptable to the industry. It is normal to use cranes for the erection of towers and the turbines permanently mounted on such towers.
It is an object of this invention to provide:
No other previous inventions have proposed solutions for the problems that this invention proposes to solve.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 14/921,056, filed on Oct. 23, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14922056 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15671659 | US |