Patent Grant
7128375
The present invention relates generally to a method and system for excavating oil sands material and specifically for extracting bitumen or heavy oil from oil sands inside or nearby a shielded underground mining machine.
There are substantial deposits of oil sands in the world with particularly large deposits in Canada and Venezuela. For example, the Athabasca oil sands region of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin contains an estimated 1.3 trillion bbls of potentially recoverable bitumen. There are lesser, but significant deposits, found in the U.S. and other countries. These oil sands contain a petroleum substance called bitumen or heavy oil. Oil Sands deposits cannot be economically exploited by traditional oil well technology because the bitumen or heavy oil is too viscous to flow at natural reservoir temperatures.
When oil sand deposits are near the surface, they can be economically recovered by surface mining methods. The bitumen is then retrieved by an the extraction process and finally taken to an upgrader facility where it is refined and converted into crude oil and other petroleum products.
The Canadian oil sands surface mining community is evaluating advanced surface mining machines that can excavate material at an open face and process the excavated oil sands directly into a dirty bitumen froth. If such machines are successful, they could replace the shovels and trucks, slurry conversion facility, long hydrotransport haulage and primary bitumen extraction facilities that are currently used.
When oil sand deposits are too far below the surface for economic recovery by surface mining, bitumen can be economically recovered in many but not all areas by recently developed in-situ recovery methods such as SAGD (Steam Assisted Gravity Drain) or other variants of gravity drain technology which can mobilize the bitumen or heavy oil.
Roughly 65% or approximately 800 billion barrels of the bitumen in the Athabasca cannot be recovered by either surface mining or in-situ technologies. A large fraction of these currently inaccessible deposits are too deep for recovery by any known technology. However, there is a considerable portion that are in relatively shallow deposits where either (1) the overburden is too thick and/or there is too much water-laden muskeg for economical recovery by surface mining operations; (2) the oil sands deposits are too shallow for SAGD and other thermal in-situ recovery processes to be applied effectively; or (3) the oil sands deposits are too thin (typically less than 20 meters thick) for use efficient use of either surface mining or in-situ methods. Estimates for economical grade bitumen in these areas range from 30 to 100 billion barrels.
Some of these deposits may be exploited by an appropriate underground mining technology. Although intensely studied in the 1970s and early 1980s, no economically viable underground mining concept has ever been developed for the oil sands. In 2001, an underground mining method was proposed based on the use of large, soft-ground tunneling machines designed to backfill most of the tailings behind the advancing machine. A description of this concept is included in U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,368 “Method And System for Mining Hydrocarbon-Containing Materials” which is incorporated herein by reference. One embodiment of the mining method envisioned by U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,368 involves the combination of slurry TBM or other fully shielded mining machine excavation techniques with hydrotransport haulage systems as developed by the oil sands surface mining industry. In another embodiment, the bitumen may be separated inside the TBM or mining machine by any number of various extraction technologies.
In mining operations where an oil sands ore is produced, there are several bitumen extraction processes that are either in current use or under consideration.
These include the Clark hot water process which is discussed in a paper “Athabasca Mineable Oil Sands: The RTR/Gulf Extraction Process—Theoretical Model of Detachment” by Corti and Dente which is incorporated herein by reference. The Clark process has disadvantages, some of which are discussed in the introductory passage of U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,597 which is incorporated herein by reference, notably a requirement for a large net input of thermal and mechanical energy, complex procedures for separating the released oil, and the generation of large quantities of sludge requiring indefinite storage.
The Corti and Dente paper suggests that better results should be obtained with a proper balance of mechanical action and heat application. Canadian Patent 1,165,712 which is incorporated herein by reference, points out that more moderate mechanical action will reduce disaggregation of the clay content of the sands. Separator cells, ablation drums, and huge inter-stage tanks are typical of apparatuses necessary in oil sands extraction. An example of one of these is the Bitmin drum or counter-current desander CCDS. Canadian Patent 2,124,199 “Method and Apparatus for Releasing and Separating Oil from Oil Sands” describes a process for separating bitumen from its sand matrix form and feedstock of oil sands.
Another oil sands extraction method is based on cyclo-separators (also known as hydrocyclones) in which centrifugal action is used to separate the low specific gravity materials (bitumen and water) from the higher specific gravity materials (sand, clays etc).
Canadian Patent 2,332,207 describes a surface mining process carried in a mobile facility which consists of a surface mining apparatus on which is mounted an extraction facility comprised of one or more hydrocyclones and associated equipment. The oil sands material is excavated by one or more cutting heads, sent through a crusher to remove oversized ore lumps and then mixed with a suitable solvent such as water in a slurry mixing tank. The slurry is fed into one or more hydrocylcones. Each hydrocyclone typically separates about 70% of the bitumen from the input feed. Thus a bank of three hydrocylcones can be expected to separate as much as 95% of the bitumen from the original ore. The product of this process is a dirty bitumen stream that is ready for a froth treatment plant. The waste from this process is a tailings stream which is typically less than 15% by mass water. The de-watered waste produced by this process may be deposited directly on the excavated surface without need for large tailings ponds, characteristic of current surface mining practice.
In a mining recovery operation, the most efficient way to process oil sands is to excavate and process the ore as close to the excavation face as possible. If this can be done using an underground mining technique, then the requirement to remove large tracts of overburden is eliminated. Further, the tailings can be placed directly back in the ground thereby substantially reducing a tailings disposal problem. The extraction process for removing the bitumen from the ore requires substantial energy. If a large portion of this energy can be utilized from the waste heat of the excavation process, then this results in less overall greenhouse emissions. In addition, if the ore is processed underground, methane liberated in the process can also be captured and not released as a greenhouse gas.
There is thus a need for a bitumen/heavy oil recovery method in oil sands that can be used to:
a) extend mining underground to substantially eliminate overburden removal costs;
b) avoid the relatively uncontrollable separation of bitumen in hydrotransport systems;
c) properly condition the oil sands for further processing underground, including crushing;
d) separate most of the bitumen from the sands underground inside the excavating machine;
e) produce a bitumen slurry underground for hydrotransport to the surface;
f) prepare waste material for direct backfill behind the mining machine so as to reduce the haulage of material and minimize the management of tailings and other waste materials;
g) reduce the output of carbon dioxide and methane emissions released by the recovery of bitumen from the oil sands; and
h) utilize as many of the existing and proven engineering and technical advances of the mining and civil excavation industries as possible.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention is directed generally to the combined use of underground slurry mining techniques and hydrocyclones to recover hydrocarbons, such as bitumen, from hydrocarbon-containing materials, such as oil sands, and to selective underground mining of valuable materials, particularly hydrocarbon-containing materials. As used herein, a “hydrocyclone” refers to a cyclone that effects separation of materials of differing densities and/or specific gravities by centrifugal forces, and a “hydrocyclone extraction process” refers to a bitumen extraction process commonly including one or more hydrocyclones, an input slurry vessel, a product separator, such as a decanter, to remove solvent from one of the effluent streams and a solvent removal system, such as a dewatering system, to recover solvent from another one of the effluent streams.
In a first embodiment of the present invention, a method for excavating a hydrocarbon-containing material is provided. The method includes the steps of:
(a) excavating the hydrocarbon-containing material with an underground mining machine, with the excavating step producing a first slurry including the excavated hydrocarbon-containing material and having a first slurry density;
(b) contacting the first slurry with a solvent such as water to produce a second slurry having a second slurry density lower than the first slurry density;
(c) hydrocycloning, using one or more hydrocyclones, the second slurry to form a first output including at least most of the hydrocarbon content of the excavated hydrocarbon-containing material; a second output including at least most of the solid content of the first slurry; and a third output including at least most of the solvent content of the second slurry; and
(d) backfilling the underground excavation behind the mining machine with at least a portion of the second output to form a trailing access tunnel having a backfilled (latitudinal) cross-sectional area that is less than the pre-backfilled (latitudinal) cross-sectional area of the excavation before backfilling.
The hydrocarbon-containing material can be any solid hydrocarbon-containing material, such as coal, a mixture of any reservoir material and oil, tar sands or oil sands, with oil sands being particularly preferred. The grade of oil sands is expressed as a percent by mass of the bitumen in the oil sand. Typical acceptable bitumen grades for oil sands are from about 6 to about 9% by mass bitumen (lean); from about 10 to about 11% by mass (average), and from about 12 to about 15% by mass (rich).
The underground mining machine can be any excavating machinery, whether one machine or a collection of machines. Commonly, the mining machine is a continuous tunneling machine that excavates the hydrocarbon-containing material using slurry mining techniques. The use of underground mining to recover hydrocarbon-containing material can reduce substantially or eliminate entirely overburden removal costs and thereby reduce overall mining costs for deeper deposits and take advantage of existing and proven engineering and technical advances in mining and civil excavation.
The relative densities and percent solids content of the various slurries can be important for reducing the requirements for makeup solvent; avoiding unnecessary de-watering steps; minimizing energy for transporting material; and minimizing energy for extracting the valuable hydrocarbons. Preferably, the first slurry density ranges from about 1,100 kilograms per cubic meter to about 1,800 kilograms per cubic meter and the second slurry density ranges from about 1,250 kilograms per cubic meter to about 1,500 kilograms per cubic meter corresponding to about 30 to about 50% solids content by mass.
Backfilling provides a cost-effective and environmentally acceptable method of disposing of a large percentage of the tailings. For example, the backfilled cross-sectional area is no more than about 50% of the pre-backfilled cross-sectional area. The cross-sectional area of the underground excavation and/or trailing access tunnel is/are measured transverse to a longitudinal axis (or direction of advance) of the excavation. Backfilling can reduce the haulage of material and minimize the management of tailings and other waste materials.
Due to the high separation efficiency of multiple stage hydrocycloning, the various outputs include high levels of desired components. The first output comprises no more than about 20% of the solvent content of the second slurry, the second output comprises no more than about 35% of the solvent content of the second slurry; and the third output comprises at least about 50% of the solvent content of the second slurry. There is normally a de-watering step at the end of a multiple stage hydrocycloning extraction process for recovery of solvent. The first output comprises no more than about 10% of the solids content of the second slurry, the second output comprises at least about 70% of the solids content of the second slurry; and the third output comprises no more than about 15% of the solids content. The first output comprises at least about 70% of the bitumen content of the second slurry, the second output comprises no more than about 10% of the bitumen content of the second slurry; and the third output comprises no more than about 10% of the bitumen content of the second slurry. The second output is often of a composition that permits use directly in the backfilling step. This enables backfilling typically to be performed directly after hydrocycloning.
To provide a higher hydrocycloning efficiency, the first slurry is preferably maintained at a pressure that is at least about 75% of the formation pressure of the excavated hydrocarbon-containing material before excavation. When introduced into the hydrocycloning step, the pressure of the second slurry is reduced to a pressure that is no more than about 50% of the formation pressure. The sudden change in pressure during hydrocycloning can cause gas bubbles already trapped in the hydrocarbon-containing material to be released during hydrocycloning. As will be appreciated, gas bubbles (which are typically methane and carbon dioxide) are trapped within the component matrix of oil sands at high formation pressures. By maintaining a sufficiently high pressure on the material after excavation, the gas bubbles can be maintained in the matrix. Typically, this pressure is from about 2 to about 20 bars. Releasing the trapped gas during hydrocycloning can reduce the output of carbon dioxide and methane emissions into the environment.
Although it is preferred to perform hydrocycloning in or at the machine to avoid some separation of bitumen during significant hydrotransportation, hydrocycloning is not required to occur in the underground mining machine immediately after excavation. In one process configuration, the first slurry is contacted with a solvent such as water to form a third slurry having a third slurry density that is lower than the first slurry density but higher than the second slurry density, and the third slurry is hydrotransported away from the mining machine. When the hydrocycloning extraction process is carried out at a location remote from the machine, the relative densities and percent solids content of the various slurries can be important, as in the first configuration, for reducing the requirements for makeup solvent; avoiding unnecessary de-watering steps; minimizing energy for transporting material; and minimizing energy for extracting the valuable hydrocarbons. The third slurry has a preferred density ranging from about 1,350 to about 1,650 kilograms per cubic meter. At a location remote from the machine, the third slurry is diluted with solvent to form the second slurry which has sufficient water content for hydrocycloning. After hydrocycloning, the second output or tails may be transported back into the excavation for backfilling by any technique, such as conveyor or rail.
The first embodiment can offer other advantages over conventional excavation systems. Hydrocycloning underground can separate most of the hydrocarbons in the excavated material in or near the mining machine and produce a hydrocarbon-containing slurry for hydrotransport to the surface. Due to the efficiency of hydrocyclone separation, a high percentage of the water can be reused in the hydrocyclone, thereby reducing the need to transport fresh water into the underground excavation. The use of slurry mining techniques can condition properly the hydrocarbon-containing material for further processing underground, such as comminution and hydrocycloning. The combination of both underground mining and hydrocycloning can reduce materials handling by a factor of approximately two over the more efficient surface mining methods because there is no need for massive overburden removal.
In a second embodiment, a method for selective underground mining is provided that includes the steps of:
(a) excavating a material with a plurality of excavating devices, each excavating device being in communication with a separate input for the excavated material;
(b) directing first and second streams of the excavated material into first and second inputs corresponding to first and second excavating devices;
(c) determining (before or after excavation of the material) a value (e.g., a grade, valuable mineral content, etc.) of each of the first and second streams;
(d) when a first value of the first stream is significant (e.g., above a predetermined or selected level or threshold), directing the first stream from the first input to a first location (e.g., a valuable mineral extraction facility, a processing facility and the like);
(e) when a first value of the first stream is not significant (e.g., below a predetermined or selected level or threshold), directing the first stream from the first input to a second location (e.g., a waste storage facility, a second processing or mineral extraction facility for lower grade materials, and the like);
(f) when a second value of the second stream is significant, directing the second stream from the second input to the first location; and
(g) when a second value of the second stream is not significant, directing the second stream from the second input to the second location.
The above method for selective underground mining allows the quality or grade of the ore stream to be maintained within predetermined limits. These predetermined limits may be set to provide an ore feed that is suitable for hydrocycloning which is known to operate efficiently for ore grades that are above a certain limit.
By way of illustration, if it is determined, at a first time, that the first stream has a significant value, the first stream is directed to the first location and, if it is determined, at a second later time, that the first stream does not have a significant value, the first stream is directed to the second location. In this manner, the various streams may be switched back and forth between the first and second locations to reflect irregularities in the deposit and consequent changes in the value of the various streams. This can provide a higher value product stream with substantially lower rates of dilution.
The grade of the excavated material can be determined by any number of known techniques. For example, the grade may be determined by eyesight, infrared techniques (such as Near Infra Red technology), core drilling coupled with a three-dimensional representation of the deposit coupled with the current location of the machine, induction techniques, resistivity techniques, acoustic techniques, density techniques, neutron and nuclear magnetic resonance techniques, and optical sensing techniques. The grade is preferably determined by the use of a sensor positioned to measure grade as the excavated material flows past. The ore grade accuracy preferably has a resolution of less than about 1% and even more preferably less than about 0.5% by mass of the bitumen in the excavated material.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
In the following descriptions, a slurry is defined as being comprised of bitumen, solvent and solids. The bitumen may also be heavy oil. The solvent is typically water. The solids are typically comprised of principally sand with lesser amounts of clay, shale and other naturally occurring minerals. The percentage solids content by mass of a slurry is defined as the ratio of the weight of solids to the total weight of a volume of slurry. The bitumen is not included as a solid since it may be at least partially fluid at the higher temperatures used at various stages of the mining, transporting and extraction processes.
The present invention takes advantage of the requirements of the hydrocyclone ore processing method and apparatus to create an underground mining method whereby the ore may be processed inside the mining machine; between the mining machine and portal to the underground mine operation or, at the portal. The latter option makes use of the known properties of oil sands hydrotransport systems which requires an oil sands ore slurry compatible with both the mining machine excavation output slurry and the hydrocyclone input slurry. A further advantage of the present invention is that the waste output from the hydrocyclone processing step may be fully compatible with the back-filling requirements of the shielded underground mining machine. The only apparatus that includes a de-watering function is typically the hydrocyclone ore extraction apparatus. Most of the water used in the various stages is typically recovered. A relatively small amount may be lost in the slurry excavation process, the bitumen product stream and in the tails.
Another aspect of the present invention is to excavate and process the ore at formation pressure so as to retain the methane and other gases in the oil sands ore for the processing step of extraction. This is because gases are present as bubbles attached to the bitumen and the bubbles can assist in the extraction process.
Another aspect of the present invention is to reduce materials handling by a factor of approximately two over the most efficient surface mining methods such as for example that described in Canadian 2,332,207 because, in an underground mining operation, much less overburden is removed, stored and replaced during reclamation.
In the embodiments of the present invention described below, it is envisioned that the mining machine will eventually operate in formation pressures as high as 20 bars. Further, the slurry may be formed using warm or hot water. The temperature of the hot water in the slurry in front of the of the cutter is preferably in the range of 10° C. to 90° C. The maximum typical dimension of the fragments resulting from the excavation process in front of the of the cutter is preferably in the range of 0.02 to 0.5 meters. The excavated material in slurry form is passed through a crusher to reduce the fragment size to the range required by the hydrocyclone processor unit and, in a second embodiment, by the hydrotransport system.
In one embodiment of the present invention, oil sands deposits are excavated by a slurry method where the density of the cutting slurry may be in the range of approximately 1,100 kg/cu m to 1,800 kg/cu m which, in oil sands corresponds to a range of approximately 20% to 70% solids by mass. The choice of cutting slurry density is dictated by the ground conditions and machine cutter head design. In oil sands, it is typically more preferable to utilize a cutting slurry at the higher end of the slurry density range. The cutting slurry density may be selected without regard for the requirements of the hydrocyclone processing step because the hydrocyclone processor requires a slurry feed in the range of approximately 1,400 kg/cu m to 1,600 kg/cu m which typically below the density range of the preferred cutting slurry and can always be formed by adding water to the excavated slurry.
The excavated material may be processed internally in the excavating machine by a hydrocyclone based processor unit. The principal elements of the processor system include a slurry mixing tank, one or more hydrocyclones, sump pumps, a decanter, a de-watering apparatus and various other valves, pumps and similar apparatuses that are required for hydrocyclone processing.
The processor unit requires a slurry mixture that is typically in the range of approximately 30% to 50% solids by mass and more typically is approximately 40% where the principal slurry components are typically taken to be water, bitumen and solids. It is noted that the slurry mixture in the slurry tank of the hydrocyclone processor is different than the slurry feed. The slurry mixture in the slurry tank includes the slurry feed and the overflow from one of the hydrocyclones.
A typical hydrocyclone unit will produce an overflow that contains about 70% of the water and bitumen from the input feed and about 10 to 15% of the solids from the input feed. Thus the hydrocyclone is the principal device for separating bitumen and water (densities of approximately 1,000 kg/cu m) from the solids (densities in the range of 2,000 to 2,700 kg/cu m). By adding additional hydrocyclones, the overflow of each subsequent hydrocyclone may be further enriched in bitumen and water by successively reducing the proportion of solids. Water may be removed from the bitumen product stream by utilizing, for example, a decanter apparatus or other water-bitumen separation device known to those in the art. Water may be removed from the waste stream by utilizing, for example, a vacuum air filtration apparatus or other de-watering device known to those in the art.
As an example, the output bitumen product stream is ready for further bitumen froth treatment. The waste stream is in the range of about 12 to 15% water by mass and so is ideal and ready for use a backfill material by the backfilling mining machine.
Therefore the combination of a backfilling machine that excavates in slurry mode is well-matched to providing a suitable feed slurry to a processing unit based on one or more hydrocyclones. This is because the output of the excavation always requires some crushing of the solids and some addition of some water to the hydrocyclone processor feed. Both of these operations are straightforward. (For example, it is not straightforward to de-water a slurry for the input feed of the ore processor apparatus.) Further, the waste output of the hydrocyclone processor is a substantially de-watered sand which is ideal for backfill of the fully shielded mining machine such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,368.
In the above embodiment, the ore extraction processing step is carried out inside the backfilling fully-shielded mining machine. This configuration has the advantage of minimizing the movement of waste material from the excavation face and of achieving a large reduction in energy consumption. It is noted that, in this configuration, not all the waste can be emplaced as backfill because of the volume taken up by the trailing access tunnel and because of bulking of the sand which forms the major portion of the waste. Nevertheless, most of the waste (typically 70% or more by mass) can be directly emplaced as backfill.
Table 1 is a mass flow rate balance, expressed in tonnes per hour (tph), for the mining system depicted in
An alternate embodiment of the present invention is to locate the principal ore extraction processing unit between the mining machine and the portal to the access tunnel or outside the portal. In this embodiment, the oil sands are excavated in the same manner as the first embodiment. In this embodiment of the invention, the density of the cutting slurry is in the range of approximately 1,100 kg/cu m to 1,800 kg/cu m which, in oil sands corresponds to a range of approximately 20% to 70% solids by mass. This is the same as the available density range of cutting slurries for the first embodiment.
If necessary, the excavated oil sands are then routed through a crusher to achieve a minimum fragment size required by an oil sands slurry transport system (also known as a hydrotransport system). This method of ore haulage is well-known and is recognized as the most cost and energy efficient means of haulage for oil sands ore. The civil TBM industry also utilizes slurry muck transport systems to remove the excavated material to outside of the tunnel being formed.
In oil sands hydrotransport systems, the slurry density operating range is typically between about 1,350 kg/cu m and 1,650 kg/cu m. In oil sands, it is typically more preferable to utilize a cutting slurry at the higher end of the slurry density range. The cutting slurry density may be selected without regard for the requirements of the hydrotransport systems because the hydrotransport systems requires a slurry feed which is typically below the density range of the preferred cutting slurry. Thus the ore slurry excavated by the mining machine can be matched to the requirements of the hydrotransport system by the addition of water before or after the crushing step.
The ore from the hydrotransport system can then be removed via the trailing access tunnel and delivered to a hydrocyclone processing facility, which includes at least one hydrocyclone, located near the portal of the access tunnel. The ore processing facility can be a fixed facility or a mobile facility that can be moved from time to time to maintain a relatively short hydrotransport distance.
In this alternate embodiment, the haulage distance for waste material is greater than the first embodiment but still considerably less than haulage distances typical of surface mining operations. A major portion of the waste from the processor facility must be returned to the mining machine for use as backfill. This can be accomplished by any number of conveyor systems well-known to the mining and civil tunneling industry. Mechanical conveyance allows the backfill material to be maintained in a low water condition suitable for backfill (no more than 20% by mass water). Slurry transport of the waste back to the mining machine is less preferable because the slurry would require the addition of water which would possibly make the backfill less stable for adjacent mining drives unless the backfill slurry were de-watered just prior to being emplaced as backfill. Other methods of returning the waste material from the hydrocyclone processing apparatus to the underground excavating machine for backfill include but are not limited to transport by an underground train operating on rails installed in the trailing access tunnel. It may also be possible to utilize an underground train to haul excavated ore from the underground excavating machine to the hydrocyclone processing apparatus.
The mass flow rate balance (expressed as metric tonnes per hour) for
Table 2 is a mass flow rate balance, expressed in tonnes per hour (tph), for the mining system depicted in
In this example, 790 tph of water is sent to the TBM 1501, 500 tph of water is added to form the cutting slurry and 290 tph of water is subsequently added to form the hydrotransport slurry. Another 95 tph of water is added to the hydrotransport slurry to form the slurry feed for the slurry tank 1502. This example differs from that of
The net bitumen output from the decanter 1506 along path 1525 is 235 tph and the tailings output via path 1523 is comprised of 5 tph bitumen, 273 tph water and 1,667 tph solids waste (14% by mass water). In this example, the density of the cutting slurry is 1,715 kg per cu m, the density of the hydrotransport slurry 1512 is 1,597 kg per cu m and the density of the slurry feed 1511 to the slurry tank 1502 is 1,566 kg per cu m. In other words, water is added at each step in the excavating process, the transporting process and the preparation for the hydrocyclone extraction process. The only de-watering operation occurs at the end of the extraction process.
Another aspect of the present invention is to add a selective mining capability to the underground mining machine. This includes the ability to sense the ore quality ahead of the excavation. Once the ore is inside the mining machine, the ore grade must be determined before routing to the ore processing system or routing directly to backfill. In addition, it is more preferable to have an excavation process that can selectively excavate layers of reasonable grade ore from barren layers, rather than mix them, thereby lowering the overall ore grade. The present invention includes ways to selectively excavate and to determine ore grade before and after the excavation step. This in turn enables better control to be exercised over the processing step.
Another aspect of the present invention is that it can be applied to thin underground deposits in the range of about 8 to 20 meters as well as thicker deposits.
In another embodiment, a fully shielded mining machine is used that employs a different means of excavation than that of the rotary boring action of a tunnel boring machine or TBM. Such a machine might employ, for example, several rotary cutting drums where the cutting drums rotate around an axis perpendicular to the direction of excavation. These cutting drums would allow the ore to be excavated selectively if the feed from each drum or row of drums is initially maintained separately. Feed that is too low a grade for further processing can be directly routed to the backfill or to the de-water apparatus of the processing unit or to a waste slurry line for transport out to the surface. The ability to selectively mine a portion of the excavated material is not possible with current TBM technology. This alternate cutting method can be applied in a portion of the mining machine that is at or near local formation pressure and isolated from the personnel sections as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,368.
In yet another embodiment utilizing a fully shielded mining machine, several rotary cutting heads can be used where the cutting heads rotate around axes parallel to the direction of excavation. These cutting heads would allow the ore to be excavated selectively if the feed from each head or row of heads is initially maintained separately. Feed that is too low a grade for further processing can be directly routed to the backfill or to the de-water apparatus of the processing unit or to a waste slurry line for transport out to the surface. The ability to selectively mine a portion of the excavated material is not possible with current TBM technology nor is it generally required. This alternate cutting method can be applied in a portion of the mining machine that is at or near local formation pressure and isolated from the personnel sections as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,368.
In yet another embodiment, the front head of a fully shielded mining machine may utilize only water jets to excavate the oil sands ore and therefore the front head may not be required to rotate. The excavated material can be ingested through openings in the machine head by utilizing the pressure differential between the higher formation/cutting slurry and a chamber inside of the machine behind the front head.
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the invention are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
Moreover though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
The present application claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/475,947 filed Jun. 4, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 604330 | Kibling | May 1898 | A |
| 3034773 | Legatski | May 1962 | A |
| 3678694 | Haspert | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3778107 | Haspert | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3784257 | Lauber et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3888543 | Johns | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3941423 | Garte | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3960408 | Johns | Jun 1976 | A |
| 4055959 | Fritz | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4067616 | Smith et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4072018 | Alvarez-Calderon | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4099388 | Husemann et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4116487 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4152027 | Fujimoto et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4167290 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4203626 | Hamburger | May 1980 | A |
| 4209268 | Fujiwara et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4216999 | Hanson | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4440449 | Sweeney | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4445723 | McQuade | May 1984 | A |
| 4455216 | Angevine et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4458947 | Hopley et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4486050 | Snyder | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4494799 | Snyder | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4505516 | Shelton | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4603909 | LeJeune | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4607889 | Hagimoto et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4699709 | Peck | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4774470 | Takigawa et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4793736 | Thompson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4808030 | Takegawa | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4856936 | Hentschel et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4911578 | Babendererde | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4946597 | Sury | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5051033 | Grotenhofer | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5125719 | Snyder | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5141363 | Stephens | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5174683 | Grandori | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5205613 | Brown, Jr. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5211510 | Kimura et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5316664 | Gregoli et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5330292 | Sakanishi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5534136 | Rosenbloom | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5697676 | Kashima et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5831934 | Gill et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5852262 | Gill et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5879057 | Schwoebel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890771 | Cass | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6003953 | Huang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6017095 | DiMillo | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6027175 | Seear et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6206478 | Uehara et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6554368 | Drake et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 20030038526 | Drake et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030160500 | Drake et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040070257 | Drake et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 986146 | Mar 1976 | CA |
| 986544 | Mar 1976 | CA |
| 1165712 | Apr 1984 | CA |
| 1167238 | May 1984 | CA |
| 2124199 | Nov 1991 | CA |
| 2222668 | Nov 1997 | CA |
| 2315596 | May 2000 | CA |
| 2332207 | Jan 2001 | CA |
| 2358805 | Jan 2001 | CA |
| WO 0169042 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040262980 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60475947 | Jun 2003 | US |
