The invention pertains to dielectric resonator circuits and, particularly, dielectric resonator filters. More particularly, the invention pertains to techniques for tuning such circuits in bandwidth and in frequency.
Dielectric resonators are used in many circuits for concentrating electric fields. They are commonly used as filters in high frequency wireless communication systems, such as satellite and cellular communication applications. They can be used to form oscillators, triplexers and other circuits, in addition to filters.
Microwave energy is introduced into the cavity by an input coupler 28 coupled to an input energy source through a conductive medium, such as a coaxial cable. That energy is electromagnetically coupled between the input coupler and the first dielectric resonator. Coupling may be electric, magnetic or both. Conductive separating walls 32 separate the resonators from each other and block (partially or wholly) coupling between physically adjacent resonators 10. Particularly, irises 30 in walls 32 control the coupling between adjacent resonators 10. Walls without irises generally prevent any coupling between adjacent resonators separated by those walls. Walls with irises allow some coupling between adjacent resonators separated by those walls. By way of example, the dielectric resonators 10 in
An output coupler 40 is positioned adjacent the last resonator 10d to couple the microwave energy out of the filter 20. Signals also may be coupled into and out of a dielectric resonator circuit by other techniques, such as microstrips positioned on the bottom surface 44 of the enclosure 24 adjacent the resonators.
Generally, both the bandwidth and the center frequency of the filter must be set very precisely.
As part of the process of fine tuning such circuits, one or more metal plates 42 may be attached to a top cover plate (the top cover plate is not shown) generally coaxially with a corresponding resonator 10 to affect the field of the resonator in order to help set the center frequency of the filter. Particularly, plate 42 may be mounted on a screw 43 passing through a threaded hole in the top cover plate (not shown) of enclosure 24. The screw may be rotated to vary the spacing between the plate 42 and the resonator 10 to adjust the center frequency of the resonator.
In addition, tuning screws may be positioned in the irises between the adjacent resonators to affect the coupling between the resonators in order to tune the bandwidth of the filter.
The frequency and bandwidth of a dielectric resonator circuit depends on a great many factors. The sizes of the resonators 10, their relative spacing, the number of resonators, the size of the cavity 22, the sizes and positions of the tuning plates, the sizes and shapes of the irises 30, and the sizes, shapes, and positions of the tuning screws all need to be very precisely controlled to set the desired center wavelength and bandwidth of the filter.
As is well known in the art, dielectric resonators and dielectric resonator filters have multiple modes of electrical fields and magnetic fields concentrated at different center frequencies. A mode is a field configuration corresponding to a resonant frequency of the system as determined by Maxwell's equations. In a dielectric resonator, the fundamental resonant mode frequency, i.e., the lowest frequency, is normally the transverse electric field mode, TE01 (or TE hereinafter). Typically, the fundamental TE mode is the desired mode of the circuit or system in which the resonator is incorporated. The second-lowest-frequency mode typically is the hybrid mode, H11 (or H11 hereinafter). The H11 mode is excited from the dielectric resonator, but a considerable amount of electric field lies outside of the resonator and, therefore, is strongly affected by the cavity. The H11 mode is the result of an interaction of the dielectric resonator and the cavity within which it is positioned (i.e., the enclosure) and has two polarizations. The H11 mode field is orthogonal to the TE mode field. Some dielectric resonator circuits are designed so that the H11 mode is the fundamental mode. For instance, in dual mode filters, in which there are two signals at different frequencies, it is known to utilize the two polarizations of the H11 mode for the two signals.
There are additional higher order modes, including the TM01 mode, but they are rarely, if ever, used and essentially constitute interference. Typically, all of the modes other than the TE mode (or H11 mode in filters that utilize that mode) are undesired and constitute interference.
The conventional techniques and mechanisms for tuning the frequency and/or bandwidth of dielectric resonator filters and other circuits have many shortcomings. For instance, the bandwidth of a dielectric resonator filter is a function of the field coupling between the individual dielectric resonators in the filter. The coupling between the dielectric resonators, and thus the bandwidth of the circuit, is primarily controlled by the size and shape of the irises between the resonators and the size and shape of the tuning screws positioned within the irises. The size and shape of the cavity also affects the bandwidth. Bandwidth tuning by adjusting the irises, tuning screws, and cavity is, largely, a process of trial and error and is tedious and labor-intensive and often consumes weeks. Particularly, each iteration of the trial and error process requires that the filter circuit be returned to a machine shop for re-machining of the cavity, irises, and/or tuning screws to new dimensions.
In addition, the tuning process involves very small and/or precise adjustments in the sizes and shapes of the irises, tuning screws and cavity. Thus, the machining process itself is expensive and error-prone.
Furthermore, the walls within which the irises are formed, the tuning screws and even the cavity all create losses to the system, decreasing the quality factor, Q, of the system and increasing the insertion loss of the system. Q essentially is an efficiency rating of the system and, more particularly, is the ratio of stored energy to lost energy in the system. The portions of the fields generated by the dielectric resonators that exist outside of the dielectric resonators touch all of the conductive components of the system, such as the enclosure 20, tuning plates 42, internal walls 32 and 34, and tuning screws 43, and inherently generate currents in those conductive elements. Field singularities exist at any sharp corners or edges of conductive components that exist in the electromagnetic fields of the filter. Any such singularities increase the insertion loss of the system, i.e., reduces the Q of the system. Thus, while the iris walls and tuning screws are necessary for tuning, they are the cause of loss of energy within the system.
Another disadvantage of the use of tuning screws within the irises is that such a technique does not permit significant changes in coupling strength between the dielectric resonators. Tuning screws typically provide tunability of not much more than 1 or 2 percent change in bandwidth in a typical communication application, where the bandwidth of the signal is commonly about 1 percent of the carrier frequency. For example, it is not uncommon in a wireless communication system to have a 20 MHz bandwidth signal carried on a 2000 MHz carrier. It would be very difficult using tuning screws to adjust the bandwidth of the signal to much greater than 21 or 22 MHz.
Even furthermore, it is difficult to implement cross-coupling between multiple dielectric resonators using the aforementioned conventional tuning techniques.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved dielectric resonator circuit.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a dielectric resonator filter circuit.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide improved mechanisms and techniques for tuning the center frequency of dielectric resonator circuits.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide improved mechanisms and techniques for tuning the bandwidth of dielectric resonator circuits.
The invention comprises a technique and associated mechanisms for implementing the technique by which dielectric resonator circuits, such as filters, can be tuned in both frequency and bandwidth without the need for irises, tuning screws, and/or tuning plates. This helps to substantially reduce insertion loss and improve Q in the circuit because of the elimination of conductive components within the fields of the dielectric resonators.
In accordance with the invention, the positions of the dielectric resonators (or at least some of them) are adjustable relative to each other within the cavity in multiple ways, including vertically (i.e., along the longitudinal axes of the dielectric resonators) and horizontally (i.e., transverse the longitudinal axes of the dielectric resonators). The dielectric resonators can be positioned relative to each other so that they overlap in the vertical dimension. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the dielectric resonators further can be selectively tilted relative to each other. This technique is particularly useful in dual mode dielectric resonator circuits in which an iris can be provided between adjacent resonators and the dielectric resonators can be tilted in the vertical plane transverse to the plane of the iris.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an off-center longitudinal hole can be machined into one or more of the dielectric resonators so as to make the electromagnetic field outside of the dielectric resonator non-uniform. With this irregularity on the dielectric resonator, the coupling between dielectric resonators can be even further adjusted by rotation of the resonators about their longitudinal axes.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, frequency tuning can be accomplished by, instead of using a single dielectric resonator per pole, using two separate dielectric resonators adjacent each other, one on top of the other, and adjusting the vertical spacing therebetween to achieve the desired center frequency of that dielectric resonator pair. Then, the coupling between adjacent dielectric resonator pairs can be adjusted in order to adjust the bandwidth of the filter in any of the aforementioned ways, including vertical adjustment, horizontal adjustment, tilting, rotating about the vertical axis if a non-central longitudinal hole is provided in the dielectric resonators.
Conical Resonators and Circuits Using Them
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/268,415, which is fully incorporated herein by reference, discloses new dielectric resonators as well as circuits using such resonators. One of the key features of the new resonators disclosed in the aforementioned patent application is that the field strength of the TE mode field outside of and adjacent the resonator varies along the longitudinal dimension of the resonator. As disclosed in the aforementioned patent application, a key feature of these new resonators that helps achieve this goal is that the cross-sectional area of the resonator measured parallel to the field lines of the TE mode varies along the longitude of the resonator, i.e., perpendicular to TE mode field lines. In preferred embodiments, the cross-section varies monotonically as a function of the longitudinal dimension of the resonator. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the resonator is conical, as discussed in more detail below. Even more preferably, the cone is a truncated cone.
In addition, the mode separation (i.e., frequency spacing) is increased in a conical resonator. Even further, the top of the resonator may be truncated to eliminate the portion of the resonator in which the H11 mode field would be concentrated, thereby substantially attenuating the strength of the H11 mode in addition to pushing it upward in frequency away from the TE fundamental mode field.
Techniques for Tuning
The techniques and mechanisms of the present invention largely eliminate the need for irises, tuning screws, and tuning plates in broad band, high frequency dielectric filters and other circuits. Particularly, rather than using extra components (such as tuning screws, tuning plates and walls with irises) to set bandwidth and frequency, the present invention utilizes the energy reservoirs themselves, i.e., the dielectric resonators themselves, to frequency and bandwidth tune the circuit.
Turning first to the matter of bandwidth tuning, it is well known that the bandwidth of a dielectric resonator filter is dictated largely by the coupling strength between the fields generated by the individual dielectric resonators in the filter. Generally, the stronger the coupling between dielectric resonators, the broader the bandwidth of the circuit.
In a preferred embodiment, the resonators are fixedly mounted to the screws and the screws are rotatable only within the holes in the enclosure. If the holes 405 in the enclosure are through holes, the resonator spacing, and thus the bandwidth of the filter, can be adjusted by rotating the screws that protrude from the enclosure without even opening the enclosure 401. Also, since there are no irises, coupling screws, or separating walls between the resonators, and the design of the resonators and the system inherently provides for wide flexibility of coupling between adjacent resonators, a system can be easily designed in which the enclosure 401 plays little or no role in the electromagnetic performance of the circuit. Accordingly, instead of being required to fabricate the housing extremely precisely and out of a conductive material (e.g., metal) in order to provide suitable electromagnetic characteristics, the enclosure can now be fabricated using low-cost molding or casting processes, with lower cost materials and without the need for precision or other expensive milling operations, thus substantially reducing manufacturing costs. In addition, the screws 407 for mounting the resonators in the enclosure also can be made out of a non-conducting material and/or without concern for their effect on the electromagnetic properties of the system.
The screws 407 upon which the resonators are mounted can be coupled to electronically controlled mechanical rotating means (not shown) to remotely tune the filter. For instance, the screws 407 can be remotely controlled to tune the filter using local stepper motors and digital signal processors (DSP) that receive instructions via wired or wireless communication systems. The operating parameters of the filter may be monitored by additional DSPs and even sent via the wired or wireless communication system to a remote location to affirm correct tuning, thus forming a truly remote-controlled servo filter.
Other possibilities for mounting the resonators to the housing include a post positioned with a hole in the housing by a simple friction fit.
The concept of mounting the resonators on adjustable screws as illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, both vertical adjustability and horizontal adjustability are provided in a single filter circuit.
This elevation plane rotation feature can be provided by any reasonable mechanical connection.
In addition, tilting in the elevation plane may also be combined with the aforementioned vertical and/or horizontal adjustability features illustrated in the embodiments of
In another preferred embodiment of the invention exemplified by
As can best be seen in
Since coupling between the resonators in this radial type configuration can be so strong, inner separating walls with irises may be desirable. Further, it may be desirable to have coupling adjusting screws within the irises to further help reduce coupling between resonators.
Separating walls with irises and/or adjusting screws would most likely be desirable in filter systems that have relatively low bandwidth. However, for very wide bandwidth applications, in which very strong coupling between the resonators is desired, there may be no need for separating walls and the corresponding irises and adjusting screws.
While the embodiment illustrated in
Alternately, the enclosure can be shaped as any equilateral polygon, e.g., a square, a pentagon, a hexagon, an octagon, with an inner wall and an outer wall. In fact, while it would likely be the most practical design, it is not even necessary that the polygon be equilateral. In fact, mathematically, a purely circular annulus is an equilateral polygon having an infinite number of sides. If the enclosure is not an annulus, then the number of sides of each of the inner and outer walls normally should be equal to the number of resonators in the circuit, but again, this is not a requirement.
Having thus described a few particular embodiments of the invention, various other alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements as are made obvious by this disclosure are intended to be part of this description though not expressly stated herein, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example, and not limiting. The invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application is a division of application Ser. No. 10/799,976, filed Mar. 12, 2004, now abandoned which is herein fully incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3475642 | Karp et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
4028652 | Wakino et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4138652 | Nishikawa et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4241322 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4267537 | Karmel | May 1981 | A |
4283649 | Heinouchi | Aug 1981 | A |
4423397 | Nishikawa et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4459570 | Delaballe et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4477785 | Atia | Oct 1984 | A |
4578655 | Etienne et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4620168 | Delestre et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4661790 | Gannon et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4757289 | Kosugi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4810984 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821006 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4835498 | Rouger et al. | May 1989 | A |
4881051 | Tang et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5059929 | Tanaka | Oct 1991 | A |
5109207 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5140285 | Cohen | Aug 1992 | A |
5218330 | Omiya et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5347246 | Bellows et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5525945 | Chiappetta et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5614876 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5691677 | De Maron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5748058 | Scott | May 1998 | A |
5777534 | Harrison | Jul 1998 | A |
5841330 | Wenzel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5859574 | Schmitt | Jan 1999 | A |
5949309 | Correa | Sep 1999 | A |
5990767 | Ivanov et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6087910 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100703 | Davidov et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111339 | Ohya et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6208227 | Remillard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6254708 | Cappabianca | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262639 | Shu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6337664 | Mayes et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6402981 | Sasaki | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6707353 | Yamakawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717490 | Mayer | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6784768 | Pance et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20040051602 | Pance et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051603 | Pance et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 41 027 | Jun 1994 | DE |
0 492304 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 601 370 | Jun 1994 | EP |
1 162 684 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 181 740 | Mar 2003 | EP |
WO 2004027917 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 376 938 | Nov 1974 | GB |
1 520 473 | Sep 1978 | GB |
57-014202 | Jan 1982 | JP |
59-202701 | Nov 1984 | JP |
363280503 | Nov 1988 | JP |
01-144701 | Jul 1989 | JP |
02-042898 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-137502 | May 1990 | JP |
02-168702 | Jun 1990 | JP |
05-102714 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05-267940 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06-061714 | Mar 1994 | JP |
07-154114 | Jun 1995 | JP |
07-154116 | Jun 1995 | JP |
03-249803 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO 0070706 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0143221 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060197631 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10799976 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11413247 | US |