Method and reagent for producing narrow, homogenous reagent strips

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7879618
  • Patent Number
    7,879,618
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 29, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 1, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
The present invention concerns a reagent coating mass which can be used in slot-die-coating of flat support materials in the manufacturing processes of test strips. Advantageously, the reagent mass of the invention exhibits certain superior rheological properties such as viscosity, surface tension and thixotropy. The reagent mass is preferably used to coat thin, narrow and homogeneous stripes of reagent material onto flat web material.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to reagents used in biosensors or test strips and more particularly to the production of narrow, homogenous reagent stripes on flat surfaces of test strips.


BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

Of the numerous methods for applying reagents to test strips, in the past electrochemical biosensors have mainly been produced by using printing techniques such as screen printing processes or dispensing techniques for liquid reagent application and subsequent drying, (see. e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,999 and WO 97/02487). In connection with so-called “capillary fill” test strips, these dispensing methods have successfully been employed, as in the production of Roche Diagnostics AccuChek® Advantage test strips. While these techniques allow for the production of reliable electrochemical biosensors, they are not well suited for high throughput production lines. In addition, these dispensing techniques suffer from the disadvantage of inhomogeneous drying of the reagent, which leads to non-uniform reagent thickness over the covered electrode area. Also, the above mentioned techniques are not suited for the reliable and reproducible production of extremely thin reagent layers (10 μm or less). Therefore, there exists a need for improved reagent application methods.


Blade coating of reagent compositions onto flat substrates has been suggested and successfully been employed in the production of reagent films coated for example on transparent polymeric substrates (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,437,999 and 6,036,919). Usually, films of a width of several centimeters to several meters can be produced by this method. For the production of test strips, the so created reagent layers are cut into small stripes and then applied to the test strip substrate. Blade coating of reagent masses has the disadvantage that—although the center portion of the film is homogenous in thickness—at the edge of the coated area inhomogeneities are found which are believed to be due to drying effects and edge effects. While these inhomogeneities are acceptable if broad bands of reagents are coated onto substrates since the inhomogeneous edge portions of the coating can be discarded by edge trim, these inhomogeneities become more and more unacceptable as the reagent stripe to be coated becomes smaller/narrower.


WO 02/057781 discloses a method for manufacturing reagent strips from web material. Among other things, it discloses that the reagent material may be applied to the strip support material by laying down a narrow stripe of reagent material, which may or may not be supported by a support carrier.


U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0097981, U.S. Patent Publication Number 2003/0099773, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,676,995 and 6,689,411 and EP 1 316 367) disclose a solution stripping system for laying down stripes of reagent solutions on a substrate. The system allows slot-die-coating of reagent solutions to web material, e.g., for electrochemical glucose sensors, which solutions have a low viscosity, from about 0.5 to 25 centipoises (cP=mPa-s).


U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,032,008; 3,886,898; and 4,106,437 teach coating apparatuses useful for coating liquid material onto solid supports.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,036,919 discloses reagent films for optical blood glucose test strips. The reagent composition comprises, among other things, a Xanthan gum.


U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2003/0146113 discloses reagent films for electrochemical coagulation sensors. The reagent composition comprises, among other things, carboxylated microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel® R591) as a film former.


None of the above-mentioned references satisfies the need for a reliable method for forming narrow (for example, less than 1 cm), thin (for example, less than 10 μm) and homogeneous reagent stripes on solid support material for producing test strips, in particular electrochemical test strips.


It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a method and a corresponding reagent composition with which extremely thin, narrow and homogeneous reagent lines or stripes can be deposited onto flat surfaces, for example, of web material and in particular onto the electrode areas of electrochemical biosensor test strips.


This object is reached by the present invention concerning a reagent for a slot-die-coating process for narrow and homogenous reagent stripes.


In a first aspect, the present invention concerns a reagent composition showing shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic behavior.


In a second aspect, the present invention concerns a method of coating the shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic reagent composition onto web material using a slot-die-coating process.


In a further aspect, the present invention concerns analytical test elements comprising the shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic reagent.


In still another aspect, the present invention concerns reagent compositions that are shear thinning and at least slightly thixotropic. It also concerns analytic test elements and methods for making analytic test elements that include using shear thinning and at least slightly thixotropic reagent compositions.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows schematically in 6 steps (A-F) how an electrochemical test element with a single reagent zone is manufactured using the slot-die-coating process of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows schematically in 6 steps (A-F) how an electrochemical test element with two reagent zones is manufactured using the slot-die-coating process of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows the results of a profilometric measurement across the reagent stripe according to Example 1.



FIG. 4 represents the data of profilometric measurements across reagent stripes according to the present invention.



FIG. 5 represents the data of profilometric measurements across reagent stripes without the use of rheological modifiers of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a photograph of a microscope view of a reagent stripe coated onto a web material according to the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows two photographs (FIGS. 7A and 7B) of a microscope view of a reagent stripe coated onto a web material without the use of rheological modifiers of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the specific embodiments illustrated herein and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described processes or devices and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein, are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates. Preferred embodiments of the invention are subject of the dependent claims.


The reagent composition of the present invention is shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic. Thixotropic reagent compositions are reagent compositions that show rheologic behavior depending on whether or not external shear force is applied to the reagent composition. Shear thinning reagent compositions are reagent compositions that become thinner, i.e., less viscous, when a shear force is applied to them. In general, before applying a shear force to the reagent composition of the present invention, the composition has a certain viscosity. When a shear force is applied to the composition, its viscosity is reduced. If viscosity increases again—with a certain time-dependency—after the shear force is stopped, the reagent composition shall be regarded as being “shear thinning.” If viscosity increases only with a certain delay after the shear force is stopped the reagent composition shall be regarded as being “thixotropic.”


Thixotropy is a special case of pseudoplasticity. The thixotropic fluid undergoes “shear thinning.” But as shear forces are reduced, viscosity rebuilds and increases at a slower rate, thus producing a hysteresis loop. Slightly thixotropic fluids have a less pronounced hysteresis. In addition, the thixotropic behavior is influenced considerably by the shear history of the material under investigation. In comparative measurements, care should be taken to ensure that an identical or at least very similar history of the samples to be compared is given.


The reagent compositions of the present invention are useful in slot-die-coating processes. During slot-die-coating, the fluid reagent composition is applied to a solid substrate, preferably a substrate in the form of a web material, by forcing the reagent liquid or slurry through the slot of a slot-die-coating head. Usually, the web material passes the slot at a certain distance with certain speed. However, it is also possible that the slot-die-coating head moves across the web material, or that the slot-die head and web both move.


To achieve the objects of the present inventions, it is advantageous that the rheologic properties of the reagent composition used as a coating mass are within certain preferred ranges: The viscosity preferably is between about 70 and about 130 mPa-s, most preferably in the range between 95 and 115 mPa-s. The surface tension ranges advantageously between 30 and 50 mN/m and preferably is about 40±2 mN/m. It is also important that the coating mass shows shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic behavior.


One aspect of the present invention is the inclusion of Xanthan gum into the reagent coating mass. One brand of Xanthan gum that can be used is Keltrol®. This component shows an influence on the thixotropy of the reagent mass. Reagent coating masses containing Xanthan gum, for example, Keltrol®, allow the production of extremely thin reagent layers. Preferably, the reagent layer dried films have a thickness less than 10 μm, particularly preferred are dried reagent layers in the range of 1.5 to 5 μm thick.


It has turned out that the incorporation of silica into the reagent compositions of the present invention has an advantageous effect for the viscosity and thixotropy behavior of the reagent. Both properties are enhanced by the addition of silica. Preferably, untreated, hydrophilic silica is used. The particle size of a preferred form of silica ranges from about 1 to 7 μm. It has turned out that silica unexpectedly enhances the thixotropic behavior of other components of the coating mass, in particular of carboxymethyl cellulose and Keltrol®. Also, silica particles in the dry film prevent backside transfer between the coated stripe and the backside of the web, allowing storage of the coated web material as rolls of material. In addition, silica particles in the dry film increase the specific surface of the reagent coating, enabling, for example, rapid dissolving of the reagent in a sample liquid. In capillary fill biosensors comprising reagent stripes including the reagent composition of the present invention, silica also improves capillary fill times and migration of components in the reagent stripe.


Yet another additive for the enhancement of viscosity and thixotropy of the reagent is carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). Especially preferred embodiments of the inventive reagent composition therefore comprise Xanthan gum, for example, Keltrol®, silica and CMC.


The reagent compositions of the present invention allow the formation of thin reagent layers, for example, the production of electrochemical biosensors. Thin reagent layers have several advantages:


Sample components are in excess compared to the reagent components, therefore not limiting in the determination reactions.


Thin reagent layers can be made homogenous in thickness.


Thin reagent layers contain only small amounts of reagent, which in turn lead to fast reaction times.


The reactions only have short diffusion times.


The thin reagent layers are quickly soluble and therefore lead to quick reagent availability and a rapid equilibration of the matrix after sample rehydration of the reagent stripe, which in turn leads to fast measurements.


The inventive reagent layers can not only be made very thin but also show a high homogeneity down web and across web in the reaction area. The reagent layer in the test area is flat and uniform in thickness. Thickness variations in the coated stripe occur preferably only on the outer 0.2 cm (or less) edges of the stripe. In preferred embodiments, these areas advantageously can either be covered during sensor assembly by spacer layers or can be trimmed from the completed sensor in the final assembly process.


Apart from the above-mentioned components, which influence the rheologic properties of the reagent composition of the present invention, the reagent may further comprise one or more substances (ingredients) of the following substance classes. Substances, additives and ingredients that may be added to the reagent includes, but are not limited to, the following:


buffers, for example, phosphate buffers;


enzymes, such as, glucose dehydrogenase, glucose dye oxidoreductase, glucose oxidase and other oxidases or dehydrogenases such as for lactate or cholesterol determination, esterases etc.;


mediators such as nitrosoanilines, ferricyanide, ruthenium hexamine, osmium complexes;


stabilizers, such as trehalose, sodium succinate;


thickeners, such as Keltrol®, CMC


proteins, such as enzymes, bovine serum albumin


indicators;


dyes;


surfactants, such as Mega 8®, Geropon®; Triton®, Tween®, Mega 9®, DONS;


film formers, such as Keltrol®, Propiofan®, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, Klucel®;


co-factors for enzymes, such as NAD, NADH, PQQ; and


silica, for example, DS 300, DS 320, milled silica of DS 300, milled silica of DS 320.


Non-limiting examples of enzymes and mediators that may be used in measuring particular analytes are listed below in Table 1.









TABLE 1







A partial list of some analytes, enzymes and mediators that can be used to measure the


levels of particular analytes.












Mediator



Analyte
Enzymes
(Oxidized Form)
Additional Mediator





Glucose
Glucose Dehydrogenase
Ferricyanide




and Diaphorase


Glucose
Glucose-Dehydrogenase
Ferricyanide



(Quinoprotein)


Cholesterol
Cholesterol Esterase and
Ferricyanide
2,6-Dimethyl-1,4-



Cholesterol Oxidase

Benzoquinone





2,5-Dichloro-1,4-





Benzoquinone or





Phenazine Ethosulfate


HDL
Cholesterol Esterase and
Ferricyanide
2,6-Dimethyl-1,4-


Cholesterol
Cholesterol Oxidase

Benzoquinone





2,5-Dichloro-1,4-





Benzoquinone or





Phenazine Ethosulfate


Triglycerides
Lipoprotein Lipase,
Ferricyanide or
Phenazine Methosulfate



Glycerol Kinase and
Phenazine



Glycerol-3-Phosphate
Ethosulfate



Oxidase


Lactate
Lactate Oxidase
Ferricyanide
2,6-Dichloro-1,4-





Benzoquinone


Lactate
Lactate Dehydrogenase
Ferricyanide



and Diaphorase
Phenazine




Ethosulfate, or




Phenazine




Methosulfate


Lactate
Diaphorase
Ferricyanide
Phenazine Ethosulfate, or


Dehydrogenase


Phenazine Methosulfate


Pyruvate
Pyruvate Oxidase
Ferricyanide


Alcohol
Alcohol Oxidase
Phenylenediamine


Bilirubin
Bilirubin Oxidase
1-Methoxy-




Phenazine




Methosulfate


Uric Acid
Uricase
Ferricyanide










In some of the examples shown in Table 1, at least one additional enzyme is used as a reaction catalyst. Also, some of the examples shown in Table 1 may utilize an additional mediator, which facilitates electron transfer to the oxidised form of the mediator. The additional mediator may be provided to the reagent in lesser amount than the oxidized form of the mediator. While the above assays are described, it is contemplated that current, charge, impedance, conductance, potential, or other electrochemically indicated property of the sample might be accurately correlated to the concentration of the analyte in the sample with an electrochemical biosensor in accordance with this disclosure.


Examples of reagent compositions are given as Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 for electrochemical blood glucose and coagulation sensors, respectively.


In a preferred embodiment, the above reagent compositions are applied to substrates which already contain the electrode traces or circuits of an electrochemical sensor by means of a slot-die-coating process. An example of this process is given in Example 5.


The preferred fabrication technique for these electrode circuits uses a laser ablation process. For a further discussion of laser ablation, please see WO 01/25775, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Most preferably, the technique uses a reel-to-reel laser ablation process. This process can be used in reel-to-reel fashion to form extremely thin metal structures on polymeric substrates, which metal structures can be used as electrode traces in electrochemical sensors. The reagent can be applied to these structures using the above process.


Surprisingly, it has been found that the capillary channel and spacer structure of the sensor can be formed by using a double sided adhesive tape with a respective cutout as a spacer structure and covering parts of the reagent layer on the electrode substrate. Unexpectedly, no leakage of sample liquid can be observed at the positions where the double-sided adhesive tape covers the reagent film. Therefore, it is possible to first make structured electrode traces by a laser ablation process on a web material, then slot-die-coat the reagent material and subsequently define the active reagent area which comes into contact with the blood sample by using a respectively formed double sided adhesive spacer. This process can advantageously be used to eliminate tolerances in the production line. Especially, masking the reagent coating with the spacer can be used to precisely define the actual reaction area.


In the second aspect of the present invention, the invention concerns a method or process for producing a reagent layer on a solid support material using the shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic reagent composition of the invention. The process includes providing a solid support material such as a web of plastics material like Melinex® 329 of DuPont. During the process of the present invention, the solid support material is moved relative to a slot-die-coating head. Usually, the solid support web material is transported in a reel-to-reel process across the slot of the die-coating head. However, it is also possible, to move the die-coating head and keep the web material stationary. During the movement of the web material relative to the die-coating head, a defined distance between the web and the die-coating head is maintained. Preferably, the coating gap is in the range of between 30 and 90 μm, typically between 68 and 83 μm, most preferred between 72 and 76 μm. By forcing the reagent composition through the slot of the slot-die-coating head, the reagent is deposited onto the solid support material, forming a continuous stripe of reagent on the solid support material. As mentioned above, the web material may comprise electrode traces and the reagent stripe may partly cover these traces. Preferably, in the dried state the reagent stripe has a width of less than 1 cm and a height of less than 10 μm.


Preferably, the solid support material is moved relative to the slot-die-coating head at a speed of between 20 and 80 m/min, most preferably at a speed of between 30 and 40 m/min.


Preferably, the reagent composition is delivered to the solid support material at a coating flux of 5.5 to 30 g/min, most preferably at a flux of 13 to 15 g/min.


Subsequently, the deposited reagent stripe is dried either under ambient conditions or in a heated airflow.


In a further aspect, the invention concerns analytical test elements that comprise the above reagent composition. Preferably, the analytical test elements of the present invention are manufactured according to the process as described above.


The invention has the following advantages:


1. Sensors requiring small sample volumes (typically 100 to 1000 nl) can easily be constructed using the slot die coated dry film and spacer/capillary channel lamination processes. The dry film stripe is of uniform thickness and is homogeneous over the electrochemical reaction area. The required capillary dimensions/imprecision of the sensor is dependent on the variation in spacer thickness and the construction of the capillary channel.


2. The slot-die-coating technology can be paired with a sophisticated layout of the electrodes design, thus enabling the capability of miniaturizing and creating multiple applications in the sensor capillary, (for example, staggering two or more lines/stripes of different reagents within an adequately designed layout of electrodes). Two staggered slot dies or a special slot die assembly designed for two or more fluids can be used to achieve this goal. The coating fluids preferably will have properly matching rheologic properties. The best technological case is achieved if the coating windows of the different fluids have a consistent overlapping region.


3. The slot-die-coating film application technology paired and combined with the rheologic properties of the reagent enables homogeneous coatings using a reel to reel coating process for rapid production of diagnostic sensors.


4. Thixotropy or shear thinning behavior is the main rheologic feature of the fluid to be coated in respect to the mass distribution and its profile across the coated layer, impacting on the flatness, repeatability and homogeneity of the wet and dried layer. This feature is reached by using Xanthan gum, for example, Keltrol®, CMC and Silica in a concentration and combination to match the desired shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic behavior of the coating fluid.


Surprisingly, it has been found that the role of silica, in particular the preferred untreated, hydrophilic silica, preferably with a particle size D50 (i.e., 50% of the particles have a size of the given size or below) of 1 to 7 μm, in the “wet” status (in the coating fluid) is that in combination with the film thickeners (Keltrol® and CMC, either one or both of them) silica increases the viscosity and enhances the shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic behavior of the coating fluid.


Silica acts in the dried state to, among other things:


a) prevent back transfer of the dried film on the un-coated side of the foil/carrier if the web material is wound to rolls after the coating and drying processes, and


b) enlarge the specific surface of the dried coating layer as compared to a smooth coating layer. Without wishing to be tied to any specific theory, this is likely due to the particle-size distribution of silica particles. Since the speed of fluid transport is increased by the ratio between the surface area and the fluid volume, this enlarged specific surface is speeding up the wetting process of the dried film and in consequence leads to a shorter capillary fill time.


The present invention is further elucidated by the following Examples and Figures. With respect to the Figures whenever possible like numbers, letters and symbols refer to like structures, features and elements. For example, unless otherwise stated in the application the following key applies:

    • 1 indicates a web;
    • 2 indicates a sputtered metal film;
    • 3 indicates a working electrode of electrode pair 1;
    • 3′ indicates a working electrode of electrode pair 2;
    • 4 indicates a reference/counter electrode of electrode pair 1;
    • 4′ indicates a reference/counter electrode of electrode pair 2;
    • 5 indicates a reagent stripe 1;
    • 5′ indicates a reagent stripe 2;
    • 6 indicates a spacer (e.g., double sided adhesive);
    • 7 indicates a top foil; and
    • 8 indicates a vent opening in top foil.



FIGS. 1 and 2 are schematic representations of the several steps that are done during the manufacturing process for electrochemical test elements using the reagent composition and process of the present invention. A person of ordinary skill in the art would readily recognize that the process can be used with other electrode configurations and with multiple stripes having the same or different composition and different positions on the strip. It is to be noted that the processes described in FIGS. 1 and 2 could also be carried out without electrodes present on the test strips. A person of ordinary skill in the art would readily recognize that the process and reagent described herein can also be adapted to optical test elements as well.


Parts A and B of FIGS. 1 and 2 are identical and show a polymer web (1), preferably an inert plastic material such as Melinex® 329 of DuPont (see, e.g., part A), on which is coated a metal layer (2) (see, e.g., part B) by conventional techniques such as sputtering, chemical, electrochemical or physical vapor deposition, etc.


Preferably, the metal layer (2) subsequently is structured by for example a laser ablation process. This process removes parts of the metal layer (2) and discrete structures of metal which can act as electrodes (3, 4) remain on the surface of the polymer web (1). It should be understood, however, that conventional printing techniques or lithographic processes can also be used to create electrodes (3, 4) on the polymer web (1).


After the laser ablation step in FIG. 1, part C, two electrodes (3, 4) are formed on the polymer web. In FIG. 2, part C, two pairs of electrodes (3, 3′, 4, 4′) are formed.


In the next step (shown in part D of FIGS. 1 and 2), reagent stripes 5, 5′ are deposited over the active area of the working and counter electrodes (3, 3′, 4, 4′). The reagent composition is applied on the electrode structure by the slot-die-coating process of the present invention.


In part E of FIGS. 1 and 2, a spacer layer (6) is laminated to the electrode structure of part D of FIGS. 1 and 2. The spacer (6) is preferably a double-sided adhesive tape that covers all parts of the reagent and electrode structures that are not to be brought into contact with liquid sample. In addition, the spacer (6) has a cutout that defines the reactive area of the reagent and the underlying electrodes. At the opposite end of the spacer (6), i.e., the end where the electrode leads are located that are not covered by reagent composition, the spacer (6) leaves free parts of the electrode structures that can be used to connect the test strip to a respective test strip reading meter.


Spacer (6) preferably covers a narrow part (less than 2 mm) of the reagent (5 in FIG. 1, 5′ in FIG. 2) to mask eventual inhomogeneous edge regions of the reagent coating.


After laminating the spacer (6) to the electrode and reagent web, in a preferred embodiment, part of the web material is cut off to trim the reagent stripe (5).


In part F of FIGS. 1 and 2, a top foil (7), preferably an inert plastics cover, is placed onto the surface of the spacer (6) that is not in contact with the polymer web (1). The polymer web (1), the spacer (6) and the top foil (7) form a 3D capillary channel which is defined by the thickness of the spacer (6) and the dimensions of the cut-out in the spacer. To enable a filling of the capillary space, preferably either the top foil (7) or the polymer web (1) has a vent opening (8).


As is clear for those skilled in the art, the surfaces of either the polymer web (1) or the top foil (7) that face the capillary space can be rendered hydrophilic by a respective hydrophilic treatment, for example, by coating with a surfactant or plasma treatment.


EXAMPLES

The following Examples provided by way of illustration and not by way of limitation, will disclose more details of the invention:


Example 1
Reagent Composition for Use in an Electrochemical Amperometric Glucose Biosensor

An aqueous mixture of the following components was prepared:














Substance
Source
% w/w

















Keltrol ® F (Xanthan gum)
Kelco
0.2136%


Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)
Hercules-Aqualon
0.5613%


Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) K25
BASF
1.8952%


Propiofan ® (polyvinylchloride)
BASF
2.8566%


(50% water)


Glucose-dye-oxidoreductase
Roche Diagnostics
0.3310%


(GlucDOR) (E.C. 1.1.99.17)


pyrroloquinoline quinine (PQQ)
Roche Diagnostics
0.0092%


Sipernat ® 320 DS
Degussa Hüls
2.0039%


(synthetic, amorphous


precipitated silica)


Na-Succinat × 6 H2O
Mallinckrodt
0.4803%



Chmeicals


Trehalose
Sigma-Aldrich
0.4808%


KH2PO4
J. T. Baker
0.4814%


K2HPO4
J. T. Baker
1.1166%


N,N-Bis-(hydroxyethyl)-3-methoxy-p-
Roche
0.6924%


nitroso aniline
Diagnostics


Mega 8 ® (n-Octanoyl-
Dojindo
0.2806%


N-methylglucamide)


Geropon ® T 77 (Sodium
Rhodia Chimie
0.0298%


N-methyl N-oleyl taurate)


KOH
Merck
0.1428%


Water, double distilled

89.9558%









The reagent matrix was custom modified to meet the demands of the slot-die-coating process. Silica, Keltrol® (Xanthan Gum), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and surfactants were added to the coating matrix to modify the rheology of the reagent mass. Surfactant concentrations were adjusted to obtain surface tensions (measured with a Tensiometer K10T (Kruess)) in the most preferred range of 33 to 42 mN/m. Surface tension in this range promotes better adhesion and controlled spreading of the coated stripe on the web. The most preferred viscosity range measured using a Rheomat 115 (Contraves) for the coating mass is 95 to 115 mPa-s. The polymers and the silica also impart thixotropic behavior to the coating. Coatings shear thin as they are dispensed through the slot die head onto the web. This reduces the apparent viscosity of the coating.


Stripes of reagent coating mass with these lower viscosities show a migration of the stripe edges and reagent components toward the center of the stripe during the drying process. This migration leads to an irregular and irreproducible surface profile in the middle of the dried stripe. Dispense of coatings having shear thinning, slightly thixotropic or thixotropic properties show the same shear thinning effects. However, the viscosity of the coated stripe returns to near the apparent viscosity shortly after being dispensed and before entering the drying region. The migration of the stripe edges towards the center during drying is retarded. As illustrated in FIG. 3, this leads to a flat reproducible region in the center of the stripe, in the reaction area. Thinner films further retard the migration of the coating edges to the center of the coated stripe.


Example 2
Reagent Composition for an Electrochemical Amperometric Coagulation Sensor

An aqueous mixture of the following components was prepared:
















End Concentration


Substance
Source
in Reagent


















Glycine
Sigma
23
g/l


Polyethylenglycol
Sigma
23
g/l


Sucrose
Sigma
55
g/l


Bovine Serum Albumin
Sigma
6.9
g/l


Mega 8 ® (n-Octanoyl-N-
Dojindo
1
g/l


methylglucamide)


Resazurin
Sigma-Aldrich
1.4
g/l



Chemie GmbH
5.6
mmol/l


Polybrene ® (hexadimethrine
Sigma
0.015
g/l


bromide)


Moviol ® 4/86 (poly vinyl
Clariant GmbH
20
g/l


alcohol)


Keltrol ® F (Xanthan gum)
Kelco
2.89
g/l


Electrozym TH
Roche Diagnostics
1.226
g/l


(reduced Chromozym TH;

1.9
mmol/l


reduced tosyl-glycyl-prolyl-


arginine-4-nitranilide acetate)


soy bean phospholipids


solution of recombinant tissue
Dade-Behring
109
μg/l


factor









Example 3
Alternative Reagent Composition for an Electrochemical Amperometric Glucose Biosensor

An aqueous mixture of the following components was prepared:














Substance
Source
% w/w







Keltrol ® F (Xanthan gum)
Kelco
0.20%


Gantrez ® S97 (Methyl
ISP
2.48   


vinylether/maleic anhydride


copolymer)


Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) K25
BASF
1.93%


Propiofan ® (polyvinylchloride)
BASF
2.94%


(50% water)


Glucose-dye-oxidoreductase
Roche Diagnostics
0.33%


(GlucDOR) (E.C. 1.1.99.17?)


pyrroloquinoline quinine (PQQ)
Roche Diagnostics
0.0093% 


Silica FK 300 DS
Degussa Hüls
1.77%


KH2PO4
J. T. Baker
0.48%


K2HPO4
J. T. Baker
1.47%


N,N-Bis-(hydroxyethyl)-3-methoxy-
Roche Diagnostics
0.69%


p-nitroso aniline


Mega 8 ® (n-Octanoyl-
Dojindo
0.29%


N-methylglucamide)


Geropon ® T 77 (Sodium
Rhodia Chimie
0.030% 


N-methyl N-oleyl taurate)


KOH
Merck
1.14%


Water, double distilled

86.227% 









Example 4
Alternative Reagent Composition for an Electrochemical Amperometric Glucose Biosensor

An aqueous mixture of the following components was prepared:














Substance
Source
% w/w







Keltrol ® F (Xanthan gum)
Kelco
0.20%


Gantrez ® S97 (Methyl
ISP
0.50%


vinylether/maleic anhydride


copolymer)


Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)
Hercules-Aqualon
0.50%


Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) K25
BASF
1.90%


Propiofan ® (polyvinylchloride)
BASF
2.89%


(50% water)


Glucose-dye-oxidoreductase
Roche Diagnostics
0.34%


(GlucDOR) (E.C. 1.1.99.17?)


pyrroloquinoline quinine (PQQ)
Roche Diagnostics
0.0093% 


KH2PO4
J. T. Baker
0.48%


K2HPO4
J. T. Baker
1.46%


N,N-Bis-(hydroxyethyl)-3-methoxy-
Roche Diagnostics
0.71%


p-nitroso aniline


Mega 8 ® (n-Octanoyl-N-
Dojindo
0.28%


methylglucamide)


Geropon ® T 77 (Sodium
Rhodia Chimie
0.030% 


N-methyl N-oleyl taurate)


KOH
Merck
0.31%


Water, double distilled

90.384% 









Example 5
Coating Process

The polymer web (Melinex® 329, DuPont) is moved into the coating area, containing a slot die head and a back up roller. The slot die head (TSE, Switzerland) is zeroed to the web surface and adjusted to a slot to web gap of 74 μm. Web speed is ramped up from 0 to 38 m/min for deposition of coating on the web. The reagent matrix can be delivered to the slot die head using a variety of means including gear pumps, pistons, syringes, bladder systems. The reagent delivery system is adjusted to a water flow of 13.58 ml/min to deliver a coat weight of 53 g/m2 through the coating head. The width of the resulting coated stripe is 7.0±0.3 mm. The coating is dried in the heated drying zone (length 15 m, temperature 110° C., at a speed of 38 m/min) and rewound on spools at the rewind station.



FIGS. 3 to 5 show the results of profilometric measurements across the reagent stripe according to this example. The profilometer system used was a Dektak IIA Surface Profile Measuring System (Veeco Instruments Inc., Sloan Technology Division, Dallas, Tex.). Profile data from the Dektak IIA were baseline corrected.


In FIG. 3, P (mm) denotes the x-position of the scan across the web and reagent stripe (in mm) and H (μm) denotes the respective relative height of the coating (in μm). The reagent mass was prepared according to Example 1. As can be seen, the reagent stripe has a cross-sectional width of about 7 mm and a respective average center height of approximately 5 μm. The edges of the reagent coating are relatively sharp. The homogeneous plateau region of the coating fills approximately 80% of the reagent stripe width.


The profile of the reagent coating as depicted in FIG. 3 is typical for coatings according to the present invention. For reagent stripes of 10 mm or less in width, sharp edges can be obtained, which ramp up from the underlying web material (corresponding to a coating height of zero) to the plateau region in the center of the coating within 1 mm on each side or less (i.e. 80% or more of the coating belong to the homogeneous center plateau region). Within the center region, the reagent coating is practically uniform in thickness.



FIG. 4 shows the results of profilometric measurements across the reagent stripe prepared according to this example. Scan Distance (μm) denotes the x-position of the scan across the web and reagent stripe (in μm) and Height (μm) denotes the respective relative height of the coating (in μm). The reagent mass was prepared according to Example 1 with milled silica. FIGS. 4A to 4E give the results for coating weights of 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 mg/m2, respectively.



FIG. 5 illustrates the results of profilometric measurements across a reagent stripe prepared according to a comparative example, i.e., not in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. Scan Distance (μm) denotes the x-position of the scan across the web and reagent stripe (in μm) and Height (μm) denotes the respective relative height of the coating (in μm). The reagent mass was prepared according to Example 1 however without the presence of the rheological modifiers Keltrol®, CMC and silica.



FIGS. 5A and 5B show that without rheological modifiers the dried reagent coating tends to form inhomogeneous reagent stripes on the web material. In FIG. 5A, the reagent concentrates in the center portion of the coated stripe; in FIG. 5B, the reagent concentrates in two regions located between the center and the edge portions of the reagent stripes. In both cases, the edge portions are depleted from reagent.


Comparison of FIG. 5 (comparative example) with FIGS. 3 and 4 (both according to the present invention) reveals the advantageous effects of the reagent composition and process of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a photograph of a microscope view of a reagent stripe (central dark rectangular area) coated onto a web material (light areas around the central stripe) from a reagent composition according to Example 1 (and comparable to the profilometric data shown in FIG. 4). Coating was done according to Example 5. The coated stripe shows good homogeneity across the coating direction (coating direction was from top to bottom) as well as along this direction.


In stark contrast to the smooth and uniform reagent layer shown in FIG. 6, FIGS. 7A and 7B are photographs of microscope views (comparative examples) of reagent stripes coated onto web material with profilometric data comparable to that shown in FIG. 5. Coating was done according to Example 5; however, the reagent did not contain the rheological modifiers. The coated stripes clearly show inhomogeneities across the coating direction (coating direction was from top to bottom). For example, regions of thicker reagent are manifested by the dark bands running along the stripes. FIG. 7A shows one such dark band positioned in about the middle of the stripe (compare FIG. 5A), whereas FIG. 7B shows two dark bands (compare FIG. 5B). These one or two regions of thicker reagent coatings (dark zones) within the reagent stripe are believed due to drying effects of the reagent coating materials.


Example 6
Variation of Rheological Modifiers in the Reagent Composition of Example 1

In the reagent composition of Example 1 the contents of the ingredients CMC, Keltrol®, Propiofan® and PVP were varied in accordance with the following Table. Ingredient contents are given in % w/w and viscosity is given in mPa-s.


















CMC
Keltrol ®
PVP
Propiofan ®
Silica
Viscosity
Thixotrophic





















0.56
0.21
1.9
2.86
2
117
yes


0.476
0.28
1.52
2.29
2
99
yes


0
0.77
1.52
2.29
2
69.5
yes


0.77
0
2.28
3.43
2
149
yes


0.504
0.4
1.9
2.86
2
123
weak









All publications, patents and patent applications cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference, as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference and set forth in its entirety herein.


While preferred embodiments incorporating the principles of the present invention have been disclosed hereinabove, the present invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Instead, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A process for producing a reagent layer on a solid support material, comprising the steps of: providing a solid support material; moving said solid support material relative to a slot-die-coating head;maintaining a defined distance between the surface of said solid support material and said slot-die-coating head;depositing a shear thinning, at least slightly thixotropic reagent through said slot-die-coating head to create a continuous stripe of reagent on said solid support material, wherein said reagent has a viscosity of between about 95 to 115 mPa-s and a surface tension of between about 33 and 42 mN/m; anddrying the coated reagent stripe on said support material.
  • 2. The process according to claim 1, wherein said reagent is deposited on said solid support at a coating flux rate of about 5.5 to about 30 g/min.
  • 3. The process according to claim 1, wherein said reagent is deposited on said solid support at a coating flux rate of about 13 to about 15 g/min.
  • 4. The process according to claim 1, wherein said defined distance between said slot-die-coating head and said support material is between 30 and 90 μm.
  • 5. The process according to claim 1, wherein said support material moves relative to said slot-die-coating head at a rate of between 20 and 80 m/min.
  • 6. The process according to claim 1, wherein said support material moves relative to said slot-die-coating head at a rate of between 30 and 40 m/min.
  • 7. The process according to claim 1, wherein said stripe of reagent is less than 1 cm wide.
  • 8. The process according to claim 1, wherein after drying, said reagent on said solid support material has a height of less than 10 μm.
  • 9. The process according to claim 1, said reagent including at least one of buffers, enzymes, mediators, stabilizers, thickeners, proteins, indicators, dyes, film formers, surfactants and co-factors.
  • 10. The process according to claim 9, said reagent further including at least one of silica, xanthan gum and CMC.
  • 11. The process according to claim 9, said reagent further including silica and at least one of xanthan gum and CMC.
  • 12. The process according to claim 9, said reagent further including silica, xanthan gum and CMC.
  • 13. In a process for preparing biosensors from a webbing of a substrate, the improvement comprising: depositing a continuous stripe of reagent onto the webbing in the form of a shear thinning, at least slightly thixotropic reagent having a viscosity of between about 95 to 115 mPa-s and a surface tension of between about 33 and 42 mN/m; anddrying the coated reagent stripe on said support material.
  • 14. A process for preparing biosensors comprising: depositing a continuous stripe of reagent onto a webbing in the form of a shear thinning, at least slightly thixotropic reagent having a viscosity of between about 95 to 115 mPa-s and a surface tension of between about 33 and 42 mN/m;applying a spacer layer over the reagent; andattaching the spacer layer to the webbing.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/871,966, filed Jun. 18, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,437 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/480,397, filed Jun. 20, 2003, which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application is related to commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/871,673 entitled “Reagent Stripe for Test Strip” (hereinafter “Reagent Stripe application”), filed on Jun. 18, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (370)
Number Name Date Kind
3715192 Wenz et al. Feb 1973 A
3980437 Kishimoto et al. Sep 1976 A
4065263 Woodbridge, III Dec 1977 A
4225410 Pace Sep 1980 A
4420564 Tsuji et al. Dec 1983 A
4476149 Poppe et al. Oct 1984 A
4510383 Ruppender Apr 1985 A
4545382 Higgins et al. Oct 1985 A
4571292 Liu et al. Feb 1986 A
4578716 Van Rijckevorsel et al. Mar 1986 A
4592893 Poppe et al. Jun 1986 A
4671288 Gough Jun 1987 A
4679562 Luksha Jul 1987 A
4714874 Morris et al. Dec 1987 A
4789804 Karube et al. Dec 1988 A
4797256 Watlington, IV Jan 1989 A
4805624 Yao et al. Feb 1989 A
4877580 Aronowitz et al. Oct 1989 A
4897173 Nankai et al. Jan 1990 A
4927516 Yamaguchi et al. May 1990 A
4935105 Churchouse Jun 1990 A
4938860 Wogoman Jul 1990 A
4970145 Bennetto et al. Nov 1990 A
5049487 Phillips et al. Sep 1991 A
5059394 Phillips et al. Oct 1991 A
5066372 Wetall Nov 1991 A
5120420 Nankai et al. Jun 1992 A
5122244 Hoenes et al. Jun 1992 A
5141850 Cole et al. Aug 1992 A
5141868 Shanks et al. Aug 1992 A
5143694 Schafer et al. Sep 1992 A
5179005 Phillips et al. Jan 1993 A
5187100 Matzinger et al. Feb 1993 A
5192415 Yoshioka et al. Mar 1993 A
5243516 White Sep 1993 A
5250439 Musho et al. Oct 1993 A
5264103 Yoshioka et al. Nov 1993 A
5266179 Nankai et al. Nov 1993 A
5281395 Markart et al. Jan 1994 A
5286362 Hoenes et al. Feb 1994 A
5288636 Pollmann et al. Feb 1994 A
5296192 Carroll et al. Mar 1994 A
5304468 Phillips et al. Apr 1994 A
5306623 Kiser et al. Apr 1994 A
5344754 Zweig Sep 1994 A
5366609 White et al. Nov 1994 A
5379214 Arbuckle et al. Jan 1995 A
5384028 Ito Jan 1995 A
5385846 Kuhn et al. Jan 1995 A
5389215 Horiuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5395504 Saurer et al. Mar 1995 A
5413690 Kost et al. May 1995 A
5413764 Haar May 1995 A
5418142 Kiser et al. May 1995 A
5421189 Dussault Jun 1995 A
5424035 Hones et al. Jun 1995 A
5426032 Phillips et al. Jun 1995 A
5437999 Diebold et al. Aug 1995 A
5438271 White et al. Aug 1995 A
5439826 Kontorovich Aug 1995 A
5469846 Khan Nov 1995 A
5470533 Shindo et al. Nov 1995 A
5494638 Gullick Feb 1996 A
5508171 Walling et al. Apr 1996 A
5509410 Hill et al. Apr 1996 A
5515170 Matzinger et al. May 1996 A
5526120 Jina et al. Jun 1996 A
5547702 Gleisner Aug 1996 A
5552116 Yokota et al. Sep 1996 A
5554531 Zweig Sep 1996 A
5563042 Phillips et al. Oct 1996 A
5569608 Sommer Oct 1996 A
5575895 Ikeda et al. Nov 1996 A
5575930 Tetje-Girault et al. Nov 1996 A
5580794 Allen Dec 1996 A
5582697 Ikeda et al. Dec 1996 A
5597532 Connolly Jan 1997 A
5605837 Karimi et al. Feb 1997 A
5620579 Genshaw et al. Apr 1997 A
5620863 Tomasco et al. Apr 1997 A
5627075 Bateson May 1997 A
5628890 Carter et al. May 1997 A
5645798 Schreiber et al. Jul 1997 A
5650062 Ikeda et al. Jul 1997 A
5653863 Genshaw et al. Aug 1997 A
5656502 MacKay et al. Aug 1997 A
5658443 Yamamoto et al. Aug 1997 A
5665215 Bussmann et al. Sep 1997 A
5670031 Hintsche et al. Sep 1997 A
5677546 Yu Oct 1997 A
5682884 Hill et al. Nov 1997 A
5691486 Behringer et al. Nov 1997 A
5695623 Michel et al. Dec 1997 A
5698083 Glass Dec 1997 A
5708247 McAleer et al. Jan 1998 A
5720862 Hamamoto et al. Feb 1998 A
5723284 Ye Mar 1998 A
5727548 Hill et al. Mar 1998 A
5757666 Schreiber et al. May 1998 A
5762770 Pritchard et al. Jun 1998 A
5766789 James et al. Jun 1998 A
5780304 Matzinger et al. Jul 1998 A
5788833 Lewis et al. Aug 1998 A
5789255 Yu Aug 1998 A
5798031 Charlton et al. Aug 1998 A
5830341 Gilmartin Nov 1998 A
5843691 Douglas et al. Dec 1998 A
5846744 Athey et al. Dec 1998 A
5849174 Sanghera et al. Dec 1998 A
5856195 Charlton et al. Jan 1999 A
5869972 Birch et al. Feb 1999 A
5890489 Elden Apr 1999 A
5897522 Nitzan Apr 1999 A
5904898 Markart May 1999 A
5911872 Lewis et al. Jun 1999 A
5916156 Hildenbrand et al. Jun 1999 A
5921925 Cartmell et al. Jul 1999 A
5945341 Howard, III Aug 1999 A
5951836 McAleer et al. Sep 1999 A
5965380 Heller et al. Oct 1999 A
5968760 Phillips et al. Oct 1999 A
5989917 McAleer et al. Nov 1999 A
5997817 Crismore et al. Dec 1999 A
6004441 Fujiwara et al. Dec 1999 A
6036919 Thym et al. Mar 2000 A
6044285 Chaiken et al. Mar 2000 A
6071391 Gotoh et al. Jun 2000 A
6087182 Jeng et al. Jul 2000 A
6091975 Daddona et al. Jul 2000 A
6102872 Doneen et al. Aug 2000 A
6103033 Say et al. Aug 2000 A
6120676 Heller et al. Sep 2000 A
6121009 Heller et al. Sep 2000 A
6121050 Han Sep 2000 A
6129823 Hughes et al. Oct 2000 A
6134461 Say et al. Oct 2000 A
6143164 Heller et al. Nov 2000 A
6144869 Berner et al. Nov 2000 A
6150124 Riedel Nov 2000 A
6153069 Pottgen et al. Nov 2000 A
RE36991 Yamamoto et al. Dec 2000 E
6156173 Gotah et al. Dec 2000 A
6159745 Roberts et al. Dec 2000 A
6162611 Heller et al. Dec 2000 A
6162639 Douglas Dec 2000 A
6168957 Matzinger et al. Jan 2001 B1
6170318 Lewis Jan 2001 B1
6174420 Hodges et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175752 Say et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176988 Kessler Jan 2001 B1
6179979 Hodges et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180062 Naka et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193873 Ohara et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200773 Ouyang et al. Mar 2001 B1
6225078 Ikeda et al. May 2001 B1
6241862 McAleer et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251260 Heller et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258229 Winarta et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258254 Miyamoto et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259937 Schulman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268162 Phillips et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270637 Crismore et al. Aug 2001 B1
6271044 Ballerstadt et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277641 Yager Aug 2001 B1
6281006 Heller et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284125 Hodges et al. Sep 2001 B1
6284550 Carroll et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287451 Winarta et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287595 Loewy et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295506 Heinonen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299757 Feldman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300123 Vadgama et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300142 Andrewes et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309526 Fujiwara et al. Oct 2001 B1
6315951 Markart Nov 2001 B1
6316264 Corey et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325917 Maxwell et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329161 Heller et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335203 Patel et al. Jan 2002 B1
6338790 Feldman et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340428 Ikeda et al. Jan 2002 B1
6349230 Kawanaka Feb 2002 B1
6377894 Deweese et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377896 Sato et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379513 Chambers et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395227 Kiser et al. May 2002 B1
6413395 Bhullar et al. Jul 2002 B1
6413410 Hodges et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420128 Ouyang et al. Jul 2002 B1
6444115 Hodges et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447657 Bhullar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454921 Hodges et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458258 Taniike et al. Oct 2002 B2
6461496 Feldman et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475360 Hodges et al. Nov 2002 B1
6475372 Ohara et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484046 Say et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485923 Yani et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488827 Shartle Dec 2002 B1
6489133 Phillips et al. Dec 2002 B2
6491803 Shen et al. Dec 2002 B1
6491870 Patel et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501976 Sohrab Dec 2002 B1
6503381 Gotoh et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514718 Heller et al. Feb 2003 B2
6514769 Lee Feb 2003 B2
6521110 Hodges et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521182 Shartle et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525330 Paolini et al. Feb 2003 B2
6525549 Poellmann Feb 2003 B1
6526298 Khalil et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531040 Musho et al. Mar 2003 B2
6531322 Jurik et al. Mar 2003 B1
6540890 Bhullar et al. Apr 2003 B1
6540891 Stewart et al. Apr 2003 B1
6541266 Modzelewski et al. Apr 2003 B2
6544474 Douglas Apr 2003 B2
6549796 Schrab Apr 2003 B2
6551494 Heller et al. Apr 2003 B1
6555061 Leong et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558528 Matzinger May 2003 B1
6560471 Heller et al. May 2003 B1
6561989 Whitson May 2003 B2
6565509 Say et al. May 2003 B1
6565738 Henning et al. May 2003 B1
6571651 Hodges Jun 2003 B1
6572822 Jurik et al. Jun 2003 B2
6576101 Heller et al. Jun 2003 B1
6576117 Iketaki et al. Jun 2003 B1
6576416 Haviland et al. Jun 2003 B2
6576461 Heller et al. Jun 2003 B2
6579690 Bonnecaze et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591125 Buse et al. Jul 2003 B1
6592745 Feldman et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594514 Berner et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599406 Kawanaka et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599407 Taniike et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600997 Deweese et al. Jul 2003 B2
6605200 Mao et al. Aug 2003 B1
6605201 Mao et al. Aug 2003 B1
6607658 Heller et al. Aug 2003 B1
6616819 Liamos et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618603 Yaralli et al. Sep 2003 B2
6618934 Feldman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6627057 Bhullar et al. Sep 2003 B1
6632349 Hodges et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638415 Hodges et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638716 Heller et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645359 Bhullar et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654625 Say et al. Nov 2003 B1
6656702 Yugawa et al. Dec 2003 B1
6676995 Dick et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689411 Dick et al. Feb 2004 B2
6716620 Bashir et al. Apr 2004 B2
6719887 Hasegawa et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723371 Chih-Lui Apr 2004 B2
6743635 Neel et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746582 Heller et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749740 Liamos et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764581 Forrow et al. Jul 2004 B1
6776888 Yamamoto et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777243 Fukuoka et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787013 Chang et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800488 Khan et al. Oct 2004 B2
6814844 Bhullar et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818180 Douglas Nov 2004 B2
6821483 Phillips et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827829 Kawanaka et al. Dec 2004 B2
6830669 Miyazaki et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833110 Black Dec 2004 B2
6841389 Novikov et al. Jan 2005 B2
6856125 Kermani Feb 2005 B2
6860978 Yamanishi et al. Mar 2005 B2
6863800 Karinka Mar 2005 B2
6881322 Tokunaga et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881550 Phillips et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881551 Heller Apr 2005 B2
7022218 Taniike et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041206 Gephart et al. May 2006 B2
20010042683 Musho et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010052470 Hodges et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010053535 Bashir et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010054319 Heller et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055784 Noda et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020004196 Whitson Jan 2002 A1
20020019707 Cohen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020043471 Ikeda et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020044890 Black Apr 2002 A1
20020053523 Liamos et al. May 2002 A1
20020081588 De Lumley-woodyear et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082797 Deweese et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020084196 Liamos et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092612 Davies et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100685 Huang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020102739 Nomura et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112969 Hodges et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020125145 Ohara et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133064 Ueno et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020137200 Takahashi et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020137230 Nadaoka et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020139692 Tokunaga et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020148739 Liamos et al. Oct 2002 A2
20020157948 Liamos et al. Oct 2002 A2
20020164822 Takahashi et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020168290 Yuzhakov et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170823 Housefield et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020175087 Hodges et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177788 Hodges et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020179440 Tokunaga et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020179442 Miyazaki et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020185385 Charlton Dec 2002 A1
20020189941 Katsuki Dec 2002 A1
20030000834 Yoshioka et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030004403 Drinan et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024811 Davies et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032875 Taniike et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030042137 Mao et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030042150 Ryu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046811 Chang et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030073152 Phillips et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073153 Phillips et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088166 Say et al. May 2003 A1
20030094383 Kermani May 2003 A1
20030097981 Dick et al. May 2003 A1
20030098233 Kermani et al. May 2003 A1
20030099773 Dick et al. May 2003 A1
20030100030 Nadaoka et al. May 2003 A1
20030102213 Gotoh et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030106809 Kermani et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030109798 Kermani Jun 2003 A1
20030132110 Hasegawa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030143113 Yuzhakov et al. Jul 2003 A2
20030146110 Karinka et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030146436 Parker et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030150724 Kawanaka et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030155237 Surridge et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159944 Pottgen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159945 Miyazaki et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030164293 Hodges et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175841 Watanabe et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175946 Tokunaga et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030176183 Drucker et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180183 Fukuoka et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185705 Otake Oct 2003 A1
20030187338 Say et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030188427 Say et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199744 Buse et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199893 Boecker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030201194 Heller et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203498 Neel et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203503 Fukuoka et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217918 Davies et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040005721 Tanike et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040016642 Miyazaki et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040020777 Miyamoto et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040067166 Karinka et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040094432 Neel et al. May 2004 A1
20040094433 Neel et al. May 2004 A1
20040096928 Hasegawa et al. May 2004 A1
20040099540 Neel et al. May 2004 A1
20040104131 Neel et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040106941 Roe et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127818 Roe et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040127819 Roe et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040182703 Bell et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040206625 Bhullar et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040251131 Ueno et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050013731 Burke et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050016844 Burke et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050019212 Bhullar et al. Jan 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (177)
Number Date Country
1 467 496 May 2003 CN
102 22 428 Dec 2002 DE
0 057 110 Aug 1982 EP
0 127 958 Dec 1984 EP
0 034 049 Jan 1985 EP
0 164 180 Dec 1985 EP
0 170 375 Feb 1986 EP
0 171 148 Feb 1986 EP
0 186 286 Jul 1986 EP
0 230 472 Aug 1987 EP
0 255 291 Feb 1988 EP
0 267 724 May 1988 EP
0 287 883 Oct 1988 EP
0 359 831 Mar 1990 EP
0 383 322 Aug 1990 EP
0 471 986 Feb 1992 EP
0 537 761 Apr 1993 EP
0 546 536 Jun 1993 EP
0 732 406 Sep 1996 EP
0 736 607 Oct 1996 EP
0 740 786 Nov 1996 EP
0 837 320 Apr 1998 EP
0 840 122 May 1998 EP
0 851 224 Jul 1998 EP
0 873 514 Oct 1998 EP
0 876 506 Nov 1998 EP
0 882 226 Dec 1998 EP
0 887 421 Dec 1998 EP
0 958 495 Nov 1999 EP
0 964 059 Dec 1999 EP
0 967 480 Dec 1999 EP
0 987 544 Mar 2000 EP
1 009 850 Jun 2000 EP
1 024 358 Aug 2000 EP
1 074 832 Feb 2001 EP
1 102 991 May 2001 EP
1 119 637 Aug 2001 EP
1 129 211 Sep 2001 EP
1 130 390 Sep 2001 EP
1 152 239 Nov 2001 EP
1 156 324 Nov 2001 EP
1 225 448 Jul 2002 EP
1 235 069 Aug 2002 EP
1 236 995 Sep 2002 EP
1 256 798 Nov 2002 EP
1 260 589 Nov 2002 EP
1 275 732 Jan 2003 EP
1 281 955 Feb 2003 EP
1 288 654 Mar 2003 EP
1 308 720 May 2003 EP
1 312 919 May 2003 EP
1 316 367 Jun 2003 EP
1 318 396 Jun 2003 EP
1 324 025 Jul 2003 EP
1 327 881 Jul 2003 EP
1 352 611 Oct 2003 EP
1 352 969 Oct 2003 EP
1 369 684 Dec 2003 EP
1 369 687 Dec 2003 EP
1 391 716 Feb 2004 EP
1 394 535 Mar 2004 EP
1 431 758 Jun 2004 EP
2365123 Feb 2002 GB
63128252 May 1988 JP
1291153 Nov 1989 JP
05-312761 Nov 1993 JP
09-189675 Jul 1997 JP
10 307119 Nov 1998 JP
11 337514 Dec 1999 JP
2004-20465 Jan 2004 JP
WO 8607632 Dec 1986 WO
WO 8909397 Oct 1989 WO
WO 9222669 Dec 1992 WO
WO 9416095 Jul 1994 WO
WO 9428414 Dec 1994 WO
WO 9429705 Dec 1994 WO
WO 9522597 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9607908 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9615454 May 1996 WO
WO 9633403 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9702487 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9729847 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9730344 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9734140 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9739343 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9745719 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9830904 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9835225 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9855853 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9905516 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9913099 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9913100 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9930152 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9932881 Jul 1999 WO
WO 9939627 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9945387 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9951974 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9958709 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9964620 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0010007 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0018294 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0020626 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0026638 May 2000 WO
WO 0028068 May 2000 WO
WO 0033063 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0033072 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0033074 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0042422 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0060340 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0062047 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0073778 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073785 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0078992 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0125775 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0125776 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0133216 May 2001 WO
WO 0136953 May 2001 WO
WO 0140788 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0146457 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0157238 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0157239 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0157510 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0167099 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0171328 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0171329 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0172220 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173109 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173114 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173124 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173419 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173420 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0175438 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0184133 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0200112 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0208750 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0208753 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0210728 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0214535 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0222855 Mar 2002 WO
WO 0232559 Apr 2002 WO
WO 0249507 Jun 2002 WO
WO 0250609 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02054055 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02057767 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02057768 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02057781 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02058537 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02067768 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02070734 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02071044 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02078512 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02078533 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02086483 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02097418 Dec 2002 WO
WO 02103343 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03005015 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03012422 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03014740 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03014741 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03029804 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03032411 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03042679 May 2003 WO
WO 03042680 May 2003 WO
WO 03043945 May 2003 WO
WO 03044511 May 2003 WO
WO 03048756 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03056345 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03060154 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03067252 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03069304 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03083469 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03085372 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03091717 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004005908 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004034053 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004113901 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2004113902 Dec 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090162532 A1 Jun 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60480397 Jun 2003 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10871966 Jun 2004 US
Child 12361830 US