The present invention relates generally to the field of electronic commerce, and more specifically to a method and system for facilitating an electronic commerce transaction.
More and more Internet users are realizing the ease and convenience of buying and selling online by way of person-to-person online trading pioneered by eBay Inc., the assignee of the present invention. As a result, collectors, hobbyists, small dealers, unique item seekers, bargain hunters, and other consumers, are able to buy and sell millions of items at various online shopping sites.
The success of an online shopping site depends upon its ability to provide an enjoyable shopping experience and an easy-to-use environment in which buyers and sellers can conduct business efficiently. Current online shopping sites have certain limitations in the manner in which they present information to users. With reference to
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method to facilitate a transaction by a network-based transaction facility. In one embodiment, the method includes receiving a request from a buyer accessing the network-based transaction facility to view offerings that are offered for sale via the network-based transaction facility. The method further includes responding to the request by retrieving information concerning a plurality of offerings, wherein the plurality of offerings include a first offering of a first transaction type and a second offering of a second transaction type. Further, the method includes integrating information concerning the first and second offerings into a commingled list and causing the display of the commingled list to the buyer.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
A method and system automatically to support multiple transaction types, and to display seller-specific transactions of various transaction types in an integrated, commingled listing are described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.
For the purposes of the present specification, the term “transaction” shall be taken to include any communications between two or more entities and shall be construed to include commercial transactions including sale and purchase transactions, auctions and the like. The term “offering” shall be taken to include any products, services or goods that are made available for purchase, or offered for sale. While an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is discussed below with reference to “items”, it will be appreciated that the present invention is not so limited.
The transaction facility 10, in an exemplary embodiment, includes one or more of a number of types of front-end servers that each include at least one Dynamic Link Library (DLL) to provide certain functionality. Page servers 12 deliver web pages (e.g., markup language documents), picture servers 14 dynamically deliver images to be displayed within Web pages, listing servers 16 facilitate category-based browsing of offerings, search servers 20 that handle search requests to the facility 10 and facilitate keyword-based browsing of offerings, and CGI or ISAPI servers 18 provide an intelligent interface to the back-end of facility 10. E-mail servers 21 provide, inter alia, automated e-mail communications to users of the facility 10.
The page servers 12, picture servers 14, CGI/ISAPI servers 18, search servers 20, e-mail servers 21 and database engine server 22 may individually, or in combination, act as a communication engine to facilitate communications between, for example, the client machine 32 and the network-based transaction facility 10. In addition, the page servers 12, picture servers 14, CGI/ISAPI servers 18, search servers 20, e-mail servers 21 and database engine server 22 may individually, or in combination, act as a transaction engine to facilitate transactions between, for example, the client machine 32 and the network-based transaction facility 10. Furthermore, the page servers 12, picture servers 14, CGI/ISAPI servers 18, search servers 20, e-mail servers 21 and database engine server 22 may individually, or in combination, act as a display engine to facilitate the display of items between, for example, the client machine 32 and the network-based transaction facility 10.
The back-end servers include a database engine server 22, a search index server 24 and a credit card database server 26, each of which maintains and facilitates access to a respective database.
The Network-based transaction facility 10 may be accessed by a client program 30, such as a browser (e.g., the Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on a client machine 32 and accesses the facility 10 via a network such as, for example, the Internet 34. Other examples of networks that a client may utilize to access the transaction facility 10 include a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) network.
The database 23 may, in one embodiment, be implemented as a relational database, and includes a number of tables having entries, or records, that are linked by indices and keys. In an alternative embodiment, the database 23 may be implemented as collection of objects in an object-oriented database.
Central to the database 23 is a user table 40, which contains a record for each user of the transaction facility 10. A user may operate as a seller, buyer, or both, within the transaction facility 10. The database 23 also includes items tables 42 that may be linked to the user table 40. The items tables 42 may include a seller items table 44 and a bidder items table 46. A user record in the user table 40 may be linked to multiple items that are being, or have been, auctioned or otherwise offered for sale via the facility 10. A link indicates whether the user is a seller or a bidder (or buyer) with respect to items for which records exist within the items tables 42.
The database 23 also includes one or more category tables 47. Each record within the category table 47 describes a respective category. In one embodiment, a specific category table 47 describes multiple, hierarchical category structures, and includes multiple category records, each of which describes the context of a particular category within the one of the multiple hierarchical category structures. For example, the category table 47 may describe a number of real, or actual, categories to which item records, within the items tables 42, may be linked.
The database 23 also includes a note table 48 populated with note records that may be linked to one or more item records within the items tables 42 and/or to one or more user records within the user table 40. Each note record within the table 48 may include, inter alia, a comment, description, history or other information pertaining to an item being auction via the transaction facility 10, or to a user of the transaction facility 10.
A number of other tables are also shown to be linked to the user table 40, namely a user past aliases table 50, a feedback table 52, a feedback details table 53, a bids table 54, an accounts table 56, an account balances table 58 and a transaction record table 60.
The plurality of items includes a first offering of a first transaction type and a second offering of a second transaction type. The first transaction type implements a first price setting process and the second transaction type implements a second price setting process. At least one of the first and second price-setting processes includes a fixed price-setting process, an auction price-setting process, and a hybrid auction/fixed price-setting process.
The fixed price-setting process provides items with a price that does not change after listing, and which allows buyers to purchase quantities of the item instead of going through an auction process. The initial quantity of a fixed-priced item can be one or more. The auction price-setting process allows multiple users (e.g., Buyers) to bid on items for a fixed period of time after which the user with the highest bid may buy the item at a submitted bid price. The hybrid auction/fixed price setting process allows a Buyer to purchase an item at a fixed price before an initial bid can be placed on an item. Buy It Now items (BIN) are items in an auction that have a quantity of one, but also have both an initial bid amount and a BIN amount. Before any bids are placed on an item, a buyer can go through the BIN process to immediately end the auction and win the item by agreeing to pay the BIN price. If a buyer bids on the auction, the item converts to a normal auction and no longer has a BIN price or allows a BIN process.
Returning now specifically to the flow chart, at block 71, the network-based transaction facility 10 receives a buyer's request to view the items in a seller's virtual store.
The Seller's virtual store may consist of multiple items of multiple transaction types (e.g. fixed price-setting process, auction price-setting process, or hybrid auction/fixed price setting process). The Seller's virtual store items are items listed by virtual store owner (e.g., Seller).
Returning now specifically to the flow chart, at block 72, responsive to the Buyer selecting a Seller's virtual store, a look-up is performed within the database 23, and specifically on the items table 42, to obtain a title and other details (e.g. transaction type, price) regarding one or more items that are available at the Seller's virtual store selected by the Buyer. The items which are offered at the Seller's virtual store may be of multiple transaction types.
After locating an item, at block 72 the item is retrieved. Retrieving the item includes retrieving additional information (e.g. title, description, price, end of auction time, thumbnail image, number of bids, applicable icons) associated with the item. As the items of multiple transaction types are retrieved, at block 74 they are integrated into a commingled list. The list is known as a commingled list because the items may be of multiple transaction types. At block 75, a determination is made as to whether the end of the items table 42 in the database 23 has been reached. Following a negative determination at decision block 75, the method 70 loops back to block 72 and the search of the items table 42 in the database 23 for items being offered by the Seller's virtual store continues.
On the other hand, following a positive determination at decision block 75, the method proceeds to block 76, where a commingled list is displayed for the buyer on a user graphical interface. Referring briefly back to
The Buyer may reduce the number of items in the commingled list by requesting that only items which meet a certain search criteria are to be displayed. Also, the Buyer may request to display only those items in the commingled list, which meet a specific transaction type (e.g. Auction Items, Fixed Price Items). Furthermore, the Buyer may sort the commingled list (e.g. according to price). The exemplary interface 900 illustrated in
At block 111, the network based auction facility 10 accepts a search criteria from a buyer, where the Buyer is attempting to search for items which meet a specific search criteria in a specific Seller' virtual store. At interface 900, the search criteria are entered at a “Search” portion 904. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, at block 112, the items table 42 of the Stores database 23 is searched for items in the Specific Seller's virtual store that meet the search criteria provided by the buyer. The keywords would be used to search the Seller's virtual store by item title or item description. Items located in the Items table 42 of the Database 23 which belong to the Seller are further inspected to determine if they meet the search criteria entered by the Buyer. At block 113, the search returns a list of all items offered by the Seller's virtual store and displays the items at the Buyer's interface.
At block 121, the network based auction facility 10 receives a buyer's request to view the items in a seller's virtual store. At block 122, as described above by the method 70 with reference to
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, at block 123, a Buyer may select “View Auction Items” 906 or “View Buy It Now Items” 907 to view only those items in the commingled list that meet a specific transaction type (e.g. Auction Items, Fixed-Price Items). In the exemplary method, at block 124, if the Buyer selects “View Auction Items” a lookup of the items table 42 in the database 23 is performed and all auction items offered at the Seller's store are displayed for the Buyer. The Buyer may select “View All Items” to return to the commingled list of all items displayed at the interface 900 of
In the exemplary method, at block 125, if the Buyer selects “View Buy It Now Items” 907, a lookup of the items table 42 in the database 23 is performed and all fixed price items and auction items which have a fixed-price option before bidding has begun on the item will be displayed for the Buyer in a commingled list. If the item is only being offered at a fixed-price there will be no end time listed. However, if the item is an item that becomes an auction item after a first bid is entered, it will have an end time listed.
At block 151, the network based auction facility 10 receives a buyer's request to view the items in a seller's virtual store. At block 152, as described above by the method 70 with reference to
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, at block 153, a Buyer may select a sort criteria (e.g. Price, Bids, End Time). At block 154, the commingled list will be displayed according to the sort criteria selected.
The above-described embodiment of the present invention assumes a central network-based auction facility 10 that maintains a central database 23 of users and offerings. It will however be appreciated that the present invention may also be applied to a peer-to-peer trading system implemented as applications executing on distributed computer systems that communicate via a network. In this case, the methods 70, 110, 120, and 150 discussed above with reference to 4, 8, 9, and 12 may be executed, for example, by an application program residing on a computer system of a seller.
Further, while the exemplary embodiment of the present invention has been discussed within the context of the network-based auction facility 10, the teachings of the present invention may be implemented within any network-based transaction system whereby transactions for the purchase and/or sale of an offering are concluded between two or more parties
The computer system 300 includes a processor 302, a main memory 304 and a static memory 306, which communicate with each other via a bus 308. The computer system 300 may further include a video display unit 310 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 300 also includes an alpha-numeric input device 312 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 314 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 316, a signal generation device 318 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 320.
The disk drive unit 316 includes a machine-readable medium 322 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 324 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 324 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 304 AND/OR within the processor 302. The software 324 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 320. For the purposes of this specification, the term “machine-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to included, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals.
Thus, a method and system automatically to remind parties to a network-based transaction to comply with obligations established under a transaction agreement have been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/023,583, filed Dec. 14, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,428,996, which is related to and claims the priority benefit of provisional application for patent U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/297,665, filed Jun. 11, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4864516 | Gaither et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5666524 | Kunkel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905974 | Fraser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924072 | Havens | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5974412 | Hazlehurst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987440 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6023683 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Mori et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061448 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6104815 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119137 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6178408 | Copple et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192407 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243691 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6415320 | Hess et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466918 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466919 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6587838 | Esposito et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6934690 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7212996 | Carnahan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7373317 | Kopelman et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7428505 | Levy et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
8428996 | Grove et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010021924 | Ohno | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020026369 | Miller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020082932 | Chinnappan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020184059 | Offutt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20070255702 | Orme et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080046336 | Mosleh | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100070486 | Punaganti et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100306205 | Sun et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2253543 | Mar 1997 | CA |
2658635 | Aug 1991 | FR |
11-007452 | Jan 1999 | JP |
20000054343 | Sep 2000 | KR |
9300266 | Sep 1994 | NL |
WO-9215174 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO-9517711 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9607149 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO-9634356 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9737315 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9963461 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0025218 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0188796 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-02101625 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-2010141473 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997 , Response filed Apr. 1, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 25, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583 , Appeal Brief filed Aug. 21, 2012”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Advisory Action mailed May 23, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Sep. 7, 2011”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 29, 2007”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2007”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2011”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 28, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 26, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed May 28, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Aug. 3, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Response filed Jan. 28, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 28, 2009”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Response filed Jan. 29, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 29, 2007”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Response filed Jul. 16, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2009”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Response filed Aug. 9, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2007”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Response filed Nov. 8, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2010”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Response filed Dec. 15, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/023,583, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 21, 2006”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997 , Response filed Jan. 19, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997 , Response filed Jun. 13, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 13, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2011”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 13, 2012”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 28, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Response filed Jul. 28, 2011 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 28, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, First Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2007”, with English translation, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2009”, with English translation, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2007”, with English translation, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Response filed Feb. 3, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Response filed Feb. 16, 2007”, with English translation of claims, 20 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Response filed Feb. 22, 2008”, with English translation of claims, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02811759.X, Response filed May 14, 2009”, with English translation of claims, 15 pgs. |
“eDeal Marketplace Internet Site”, eDeal Services Corp. Edeal Auctions-InterActive Classifieds, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://finditseek.at.edeal.com/>, (Retrieved Jul. 12, 2002), 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02706286.8, Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2010”, 5 Pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02706286.8, Response filed May 10, 2011 to Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2010”, 25 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10783927.6, Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10783927.6, Response filed Jun. 8, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02706286.8, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed May 25, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US02/04600, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed May 3, 2003”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US02/04600, International Search Report mailed Oct. 2, 2002”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US10/036907, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 28, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/036907 Search Report mailed Jul. 28, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/036907, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Dec. 15, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“InterShopZone, The Online Interactive Marketplace Internet Site”, Auctionweiser Enterprises, Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: Http://www.Auctionweister.com/auction/index.asp>, (Retrieved Jul. 12, 2002), 7 pgs. |
“Introduction for online shopping: a shopping on Internet for first time (written in Japanese language)”, Mobile i, Softbank Publishing K.K., 6 (6), (Jun. 1, 2000), 10 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-504306, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2008”, with partial English translation, 5 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-504306, Office Action mailed Jan. 15, 2008”, with partial English translation, 10 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-504306, Preliminary Amendment mailed Jan. 11, 2006”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-504306, Response filed Jul. 15, 2008”, with English translation of claims, 24 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-312199, Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2011”, Partial English translation., 6 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-312199, Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2011”, with Partial English translation., 4 pgs. |
“Korean Application No. 2007-7029722, Trial Decision dated Mar. 16, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 29, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 8 Pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Notice of Allowance mailed May 1, 2012”, With English translation, 3 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Office Action mailed Feb. 15, 2012”, With English Translation, 14 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2009”, with English translation, 9 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Office Action Response filed Jul. 29, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Response filed Apr. 16, 2012 to Office Action mailed Feb. 24, 2012”, with English translation of claims, 22 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Response filed Dec. 14, 2009”, 55 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2009-7007814, Supplementary Appeal Brief filed Sep. 21, 2011”, with English translation, 17 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2003-7016152 Trial Decision mailed Jul. 8, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2003-7016152, Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2007”, with English translation of claims, 6 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2003-7016152, Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2003-7016152, Response filed Apr. 16, 2007”, with English translation 24 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2008”, with English translation 16 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Office Action mailed Mar. 17, 2009”, with English translation 16 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2009”, with English translation 10 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Response filed Apr. 16, 2009”, 22 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Response filed Oct. 31, 2008”, 33 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Response filed Nov. 19, 2009”, with English translation of claims, 25 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2007-7029722, Supplemental Appeal Brief filed Mar. 19, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“Onsale Joins Fray as Online Shopping Picks Up Speed: Internet Booms”, Computer Reseller News, CMP Publications, Inc., USA, (Jun. 5, 1995), 1 pg. |
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online; Unique Internet retail service debuts with week-long charity auction for the Computer Museum in Boston”, Business Wire, Dialog Web. 0489267 BW0022, (May 24, 1995), 3 pgs. |
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (Jan. 1995), 83-84. |
Business Wire, “Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thorny HR Problem”, Business Wire, (Dec. 14, 1998), 1-2. |
Clemons, E., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities”, Proceedings of ICIS 91: 12th International Conference on Information Systems, (Dec. 16-18, 1991), 53-63. |
Graham, Ian, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe”, Electronic Markets. vol. 8, No. 2, (1998), 29-32. |
Hammouda, et al., “Efficient Phrase-Based Document Indexing for Web Document Oustering in”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Oct. 2004, vol. 16, No. 10, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://watnow.uwaterloo.calpublhammouda/hammouda-ieee-tkde-oct04.pdf>, (Oct. 2004), pp. 1279-1296. |
Hauser, R., “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 39(3), (Mar. 1996), 363-366. |
Hess, C. M, et al., “Computerized Loan Organization System: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), (Sep. 1994), 251-275. |
Jiro, M., et al., “Thorough guide for Net auction: Yahoo! Auction, eBay Japan (written in Japanese language)”, 1st Edition, Sotechsha (Publisher), (Jun. 1, 2000), 39-41. |
Klein, Stefan, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 3-6. |
Lee, H. G, “Electronic brokerage and electronic auction: the impact of IT on market structures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, (1996), 397-406. |
Lee, Ho Geun, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme, Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 24-28. |
Malone, T., et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, No. 6, (Jun. 1987), 484-497. |
Mardesich, Jodi, “Site Offers Clearance for End-of-Life Products—Onsale Takes Auction Gavel Electronic”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 8, 1996), 2 pps. |
Massimb, Marcel, “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity”, Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), (Jan./Feb. 1994), 39-50. |
Meade, J., “Visual 360: A Performance Appraisal System That's ‘Fun’”, HR Magazine, Society for Human Resource Management., (Jul. 1999), 3 pgs. |
Neo, B. S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems; vol. 1(5), (Dec. 1992), 278-288. |
Nobuhiro, S., “What site is influential as a portal (Japanese w/ partial English translation)”, Nikkei Computer, Nikkei Business Publication Inc. (Publisher), 454, (Oct. 12, 1998), 98-99. |
Post, D. L, et al., “Application of auctions as a pricing mechanism for the interchange of electric power”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), (Aug. 1995), 1580-1584. |
Preist, Chris, et al., “Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction”, International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, (1998), 11-18. |
Reck, M., “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System”, The Journal of Systems and Software, 1993, Elsevier Science Publishing, USA, (1993), 245-252. |
Reck, Martin, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 17-23. |
Resnick, Paul, “Reputation systems”, Communications of the ACM, 43(12), (Dec. 2000), 45-48. |
Rockoff, T. E, et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 5(4), (Jan. 1, 1995), 10-16. |
Schmid, B. F, “The Development of Electronic Commerce”, EM—Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, (Oct. 1993), 2 pgs. |
Siegmann, Ken, “Nowhere to go but up”, PC Week; vol. 12(42), Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, (Oct. 23, 1995), 1-3. |
Takehiko, O., et al., “How to receive benefits in Auction: Yahoo! Auction—50 hints for sales and auctions”, Ascii Net J, Ascii Corp. (Publisher), 5, (Dec. 22, 2000), 2 pgs. |
Tjostheim, Ingvar, et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web”, Norwegian Computing Center (NR), [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.nr.no/˜ingvar/enter98.html>, (Accessed Feb. 21, 2005), 1-10. |
Turban, Efraim, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment”, Focus Theme, EM—Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 7-11. |
Van Heck, E., et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry”, Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, (1996), 6 pgs. |
Warbelow, A, et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”, Harvard Business School Case/Study, HBVR#9-190-001, USA, (Jul. 1989), 1-16. |
Zwass, V., “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, (Fall 1996), 3-23. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 2, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997 , Response filed Sep. 17, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Advisory Action mailed Dec. 20, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Amendment filed Dec. 23, 2013”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,997, Response filed Dec. 2, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 2, 2013”, 16 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130018756 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60297665 | Jun 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10023583 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 13621092 | US |