The present invention pertains to communications and networking. More particularly, the invention relates to the usage of resources in networking devices.
Wide-area networking systems serviced by ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) have multiple nodes that are interconnected by high-speed data links. Each network has a plurality of nodes, which may each contain switching devices that regulate data traffic to user equipment. User equipment may be connected to the nodes.
Each node has a controller device and switch, which facilitate the calls through the node. The controller has processing, memory, and other resources to interpret, forward, and process messages and initiate other messages as appropriate, while the switch ordinarily handles the physical routing of messages among nodes and user terminals.
In a redundant high-availability private network-to-network interface (“PNNI”) routing protocol implementation, a redundant pair of controllers is used in the case of controller failure. Thus, each node has two controllers, one primary and one secondary. In order to ensure proper functioning, it is desirable to perform maintenance and testing on the links.
What is disclosed is a method and system for a graceful reroute of connections on a link. According to one embodiment, in a digital communications network, a method comprises blocking new connections from being established over a link. Existing connections are rerouted around the link; and the link is taken out of service.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows below.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitations in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which:
What is disclosed is a method and system for the graceful reroute of connections on a link. According to one embodiment, in a digital communications network, a method comprises blocking new connections from being established over a link. Existing connections are rerouted around the link; and the link is taken out of service. The present techniques provide a single command that gracefully reroutes all traffic (data) off of a given link such that maintenance or diagnostics may be performed on that link. A single command may be used to initiate the rerouting with a trace message rather than manually rerouting.
Nodes 120-150 may be interconnected by links (also called trunks), such as links 110, 160, 170, 180, 190. The link may be a high speed data line such as a T3, E3, or OC3 line. Links 110, 160, 170, 180, 190 may also be virtual links spanning multiple nodes, however the user will only see the end nodes. A virtual path for data transmission between one node and another is called a connection. For example, connection 181, although passing through Node B 130, is a virtual path for data transmission between Node A 120 and Node D 150. There may be thousands of connections carried on each link.
Link maintenance device 220 allows for the locking and graceful rerouting of connections off a link. The embedded processor 250 controls the various operations and elements of the switch 200.
A data storage device 327 such as a magnetic disk or optical disc and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer architecture 300 for storing information and instructions.
At processing block 420, device 220 blocks new connections from being established across the link, which it controls. In one embodiment, the connections are blocked by setting a standard PNNI parameter, called availCR (available cell rate) equal to 0. By setting availCR=0, the node advertises that the available cell rate is zero, such that the link is not available for new connections to be established. This causes the PNNI Topology State Element (PTSE) to be broadcast throughout the network, also known as flooding. The PTSE is a data block that tells other nodes what resources are available across the link. Device 220 waits for this “flooding” to be absorbed by other nodes in network 100. Thus, in the example above, no new connections are allowed across link 180. However, the connections already established and operating on link 180 must be removed.
At processing block 430, enhanced rerouting is performed on the established connections by communicating to surrounding nodes that a reroute of connections should be initiated. Rerouting establishes a new virtual path through the network for the existing connection over the link. Block 430 will be described below in greater detail in conjunction with
At processing block 460, device 220 sends a notification that all connections have been removed from the link. The notification may be in the form of a confirmation signal to a user via CLI 115, SNMP trap, or similar event. The process ends at block 470.
These connections are processed at a throttled rate of K connections per second. The rate K may be specified by the use when the LMD is initiated. The rate K may be any rate which allows for hitless operation, that is the service outage caused by process 400 is less than 200 mSec.
At processing block 510 a trace message (standard PNNI signaling) is sent across both ends of the link that will be serviced. The trace command is sent to each connection's master node, that is the node that established the connection for the first time and the only node that may initiate a reroute for that connection. The standard PNNI trace command includes a proprietary field which may be coded to include instructions for a master node to reroute its connections. The trace command may be used because it is routed to the end-points of each connection.
Thus, at processing block 520, upon receiving the trace message, a master node may initiate the rerouting of any connections it established over the link that will be serviced. At any time during the reroute process, a user may adjust the reroute rate “K” to a desired rate. At processing block 530, device 220 waits “L” seconds for the connections to reroute. If the calls are rerouted before L seconds lapse, then the process stops at block 540.
In one embodiment, link maintenance device 220 may be used to throttle back connections on a link to make more bandwidth available, without removing all connections from the link.
The link maintenance device 220, is always available for use, however, periods of low network activity is best for performing maintenance on a link.
In one embodiment, the link maintenance device 220 works in networks, in which other nodes do not have such a device, as well. Not all nodes in the network are required to support the Link Maintenance Function in order for the function to be used on a node that does support the function.
The maintenance device 220 minimizes connection outages, without:
disrupting service, including data loss or downed time;
manually rerouting connections;
back-logging normal provisioning (the establishment of new connections);
establishing new messaging, since only existing PNNI commands are used, and
establishing new inter-node mechanisms.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawing are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5781529 | Liang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5854899 | Callon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5933412 | Choudhury et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6070192 | Holt et al. | May 2000 | A |
6111881 | Soncodi | Aug 2000 | A |
6115753 | Joens | Sep 2000 | A |
6141325 | Gerstel | Oct 2000 | A |
6154444 | Masuo et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167025 | Hsing et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6262984 | Rochberger | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272107 | Rochberger et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272139 | Soncodi | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301267 | Ben-Ami | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304549 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6389128 | Stademann | May 2002 | B1 |
6434612 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6487204 | Dacier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496941 | Segal et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529498 | Cheng | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535481 | Andersson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6594235 | Rochberger et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614757 | Rochberger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6614762 | Illiadis et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633544 | Rexford et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654361 | Dommety et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6687230 | Furutono et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6735176 | So | May 2004 | B1 |
6744734 | Iliadis et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20040202112 | McAllister et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |