Patent Grant
7890545
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/802,304, entitled “Method and System for A Generic Data Model” by Miller et al., filed on Mar. 17, 2004; 10/803,133, entitled “Method and System for Querying an Applied Data Model” by Miller et al., filed on Mar. 17, 2004 and 10/802,178, entitled “Method and System for Discovering Relationships” by Miller et al., filed on Mar. 17, 2004. All applications cited within this paragraph are assigned to the current assignee hereof and are fully incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates in general to data modeling, and more particularly, to a reference model for modeling an arbitrarily complex enterprise architecture.
The world is comprised of a wide and varied assortment of environments and subsystems. Akin to the proverbial butterfly flapping its wings in China and causing a hurricane over Texas, miniscule changes to one part of an environment may have catastrophic ripple effects in a distant part of the same environment. To anticipate these effects, it is helpful to study the ramifications of a change before it occurs, and to study these ramifications it is useful to create a model of the environment. This model can then be used to discover the consequences of a change, and the combinatorial effects of multiple alterations to the environment. Additional benefits of such a model are rationalization of the technology portfolio, and assessment and management of various regulatory and business continuity risks.
However, because of the varied nature of their composition, many types of environments do not lend themselves to modeling. A microcosm of this problem occurs in many enterprise architectures. These enterprise architectures may be intended to have a wide variety of uses: disseminating information about goods and services offered through a site on the World Wide Web, achieving objectives related to a business concern, providing a programming infrastructure for development of software, or keeping track of sales and sales force information.
Consequently, these enterprise architectures grow organically, sewn together in a Frankenstinian manner from a variety of heterogeneous machines and applications. Predicting the effects of business initiatives process and organization, the interaction of application, infrastructure and data organization within an IT environment etc. on these enterprise architecture is almost an exercise in futility without some sort of model. However, modeling these types of enterprise architectures is a daunting prospect.
Typically, there are two approaches to creating models for these enterprise architectures. The first is to create a diagram or a spreadsheet based inventory of the items of interest. This approach is problematic, creating these models requires an in depth evaluation of an enterprise architecture and manual creation of the documents, and whole document retention systems must be kept in place to version and store the documents associated with these types of models. Additionally, changes to the enterprise architecture wreak havoc on these models. The effects from these changes must be manually traced through each of the diagrams, which are not only particularly prone to errors, but time consuming as well. Other problems with storing these models in documents include that there may be a large number of users who need to be able to access and modify these documents, and documents of this type don't lend themselves to concurrent modification, and that it is very difficult to cross-reference information across these documents.
The second approach, equally problematic, is to store items of interest within an enterprise architecture in a relational database. Models created with these relational database tables, however, are particularly susceptible to changes in the enterprise architecture itself. Adding layers, applications, dependencies, projects, geographical locations etc. to an enterprise architecture may require changes to the table schema implementing the model, which may in turn may entail revising all the SQL statements used to implement the database.
Thus, a need exists for methods and systems for a data model which can model an arbitrarily complex enterprise architecture, and which is easily extensible to allow the representation of any desired logical or physical entity and the associations and dependencies between these entities.
Systems and methods for a reference model for the modeling of an enterprise architecture are disclosed. These systems and methods may provide a reference model composed of a logically structured taxonomy of component types, relationship types and property types with which to create a data model. In addition, the cardinality of the relationships between the component types may be defined as a constraint on the model. The reference model may be based on logical or physical groupings or associations of entities within an enterprise architecture and provide the ability to capture the state of any enterprise architecture, represent this enterprise architecture, and dynamically accommodate changes to the environment with a minimum of impact on the model of the environment, the underlying data structures themselves or the way these data structures are stored and represented.
In one embodiment, the enterprise architecture is segmented into a set of domains, a set of component types is defined for each domain and a set of relationship types is defined.
In another embodiment, each set of component types comprises subtypes of a generic component.
In yet another embodiment, each set of component types comprises a domain component which is a subtype of the generic component and a parent of the other component types in the set.
In still another embodiment, the set of component types contains an abstract component type.
In other embodiments, the domain component is associated with properties characteristic of the domain.
In still other embodiments, the domains are determined based on empirical analysis of the enterprise architecture.
In yet other embodiments, the set of domains comprises process, initiative, organization, application, location, infrastructure, data and policy.
In some embodiments, the set of relationship types comprises intradomain and interdomain
These, and other, aspects of the invention will be better appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and the accompanying drawings. The following description, while indicating various embodiments of the invention and numerous specific details thereof, is given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many substitutions, modifications, additions or rearrangements may be made within the scope of the invention, and the invention includes all such substitutions, modifications, additions or rearrangements.
The drawings accompanying and forming part of this specification are included to depict certain aspects of the invention. A clearer impression of the invention, and of the components and operation of systems provided with the invention, will become more readily apparent by referring to the exemplary, and therefore nonlimiting, embodiments illustrated in the drawings, wherein identical reference numerals designate the same components. Note that the features illustrated in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The invention and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the nonlimiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well known starting materials, processing techniques, components and equipment are omitted so as not to unnecessarily obscure the invention in detail. Skilled artisans should understand, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while disclosing preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation. Various substitutions, modifications, additions or rearrangements within the scope of the underlying inventive concept(s) will become apparent to those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure.
Reference is now made in detail to the exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts (elements).
A few terms are defined or clarified to aid in an understanding of the terms as used throughout the specification. The term “component” is intended to mean a representation of any definable, logical or physical entity. A component may have a group of properties. In an IT environment, an entity may be any portion of the environment desired to be represented, including hardware, such as a server or database, applications which may reside on one or more actual machines, virtual data repositories, firmware and the like. Many levels of abstraction are possible. For example, a network may be represented as a component, a subnetwork of that network may be represented as a component, a server on the subnetwork may also be represented as a component, an application running across that server and other servers may also be represented as a component, a table within that application may be represented as a component, etc.
The term “relationship” is intended to mean a representation of an association or dependency between two or more components. This association may be based on the property values of the components.
The term “set”, when used in the mathematical sense as in “a set of” is intended to mean a collection of zero or more elements.
The term “check” is intended to mean a determination whether a relationship is valid, or a determination regarding the value or validity of a property of a component. Checks may be associated with components or relationships. In some cases a check is a piece of software which may be associated with a relationship or component. A check may have an output event, such as an email or notification.
The term “property” is intended to mean a characteristic associated with a component or a relationship. This property may have a name and a value associated with it, and components of the same type may have different values for the same property.
The term “type” is intended to mean a category of a relationship or a component. All relationships or components of the same type will have the same properties, though each instance of a component or a relationship may have different values for those properties. For example, a component type named “ComputerType” may be defined, having the properties of “RAM” and “OSType”. Each instance of component type “ComputerType” will have the properties “RAM” and “OSType”, however in one instance the value of “RAM” may be 4 megabytes, while in another instance the value of “RAM” may be 8 megabytes.
The term “data model” is intended to mean a model for representing anything in the physical world, coupled with logic pertaining to that representation.
The term “reference model” is a structure or taxonomy of component types, relationship types, the cardinality constraints of those relationships or property types for use in modeling a particular environment to which the reference data model pertains.
The term “domain” refers to a grouping. This grouping may be according to any criteria, including a physical, logical or operational association. These groups may be abstract types with a set of common characteristics.
The term “subtype” is intended to mean a specialization of a particular type of component or relationship. For example, a component type “computer” may be defined with certain properties. A more specialized version of the “computer” type may be represented as a subtype of “computer” called “server computer”. The subtype “server computer” will inherit all the properties of its parent type “computer”. A subtype is also a type; consequently subtypes may themselves be parents of subtypes.
The term “enterprise architecture” is intended to mean the elements of an enterprise, the design of these elements, their relationships and how they support the objectives of that enterprise.
Before discussing embodiments of the present invention, a non-limiting, simple IT environment used in depicting embodiments and examples is briefly described. After reading this specification, skilled artisans will appreciate that many other more complicated environments may be utilized with embodiments of the present invention.
IT environment 100 may further contain database server application 120 and web server application 130. Database server application 120 and web server application 130 may have certain attributes 122, 132 which pertain to their particular implementation. For example, each may utilize certain storage resources, have a certain filesystem structure, require a certain operating environment, and have a certain footprint. Other attributes will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Each of these software applications 120, 130 may be executing on server computer 110. Additionally each of the computers in
Attention is now directed to methods and systems for a reference model for the modeling of an enterprise architecture, and how this reference model may be utilized to represent an arbitrarily complex enterprise architecture. These systems and methods may provide a reference model composed of a logically structured taxonomy of component types, relationship types and property types with which to create a data model. An enterprise architecture may then be modeled utilizing component types, components, relationship types, relationships and properties based on this reference data model. The reference model (and structures instantiated from the reference model) may be based on logical or physical groupings or associations and provide the ability to capture the state of any enterprise architecture, represent this enterprise architecture, and dynamically accommodate changes to the environment with a minimum of impact on the model of the environment, the underlying data structures themselves or the way these data structures are stored and represented. Though various simple example environments will be used to demonstrate the power and flexibility of the reference data model, after reading this disclosure it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that a reference data model of this type may be utilized to model any arbitrarily complex enterprise architecture.
In an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the computer-executable instructions may be lines of assembly code or compiled C++, Java, or other language code. Other architectures may be used. Additionally, a computer program or its software components with such code may be embodied in more than one data processing system readable medium in more than one computer.
Turning now to
Property field 240 may be used to represent the attributes or characteristics of the physical or logical entity represented by component 200, or with which component 200 is associated.
Property field 240 may be associated with one or more properties, a property may consist of a property name which may be associated with a value. This value in turn may correspond to an attribute of the physical or logical entity represented by component 200. A property may be a string, boolean, decimal number, date/time, or an enumerated type, which describes the category of values a particular property may have. In one embodiment, a property may in turn be a data structure which has a name, a description, and a value. This data structure may then be given values based on an attribute of the entity represented by component 200.
Component 200 may also be related to a set of checks 250. A check may be a piece of logic which performs operations based on a certain set of conditions. These operations may consist of checking on the status of certain relationships associated with the component 200 (as described below), checking the status of certain properties 240, and other operations which will be readily apparent. These pieces of logic may be configured to operate automatically at certain time intervals, or may be applied at any point according to a variety of different triggering conditions which will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this disclosure.
Referring briefly back to
Similarly, component 200 may represent database server 120; name field 220 may be set to “DB1”, description 230 may be set to “database server application”, property field 240 may contain three properties “OSType”, “Footprint”, and “Listen Port”, which may be assigned the values corresponding to attributes 122 of database server 120, “Solaris”, “12 MB” and “2100” respectively. As can be seen, component 200 may represent any entity, whether logical or physical equally well.
Turning now to
Returning for a moment to
However, as can be readily imagined, instantiation and definition of components and relationships for a complex environment may be a manually intensive process. To alleviate these concerns, in one embodiment, a typing system is included to allow the ability to define a hierarchy of component and relationship types which may serve as templates to instantiate components or relationships of these different types.
A hierarchy 400 of component types 410, 420, 430 is depicted in
Generic component type 410 may have a set of fields as described above. These fields may include a name and description 412, a set of properties 414, and a set of checks 416. A generic component may be instantiated from generic component type 410, and used to represent an atomic entity. For example, in order to represent server computer 110, a user may instantiate component 200 from generic component type 410, name component 200, define the list of properties pertinent to server computer 110, give these properties values based on the attributes of server computer 110, define checks pertinent to server computer 110, etc. In this manner, component 200 can be created which represents server 110 accurately. However, representing a complex environment in this manner becomes labor intensive, as a component to represent each atomic entity within the environment may have to be created manually.
To remedy this problem, more specific component types may be defined which serve as templates to instantiate components which represent specific entities in an environment. For example, a computer component type 420 may be defined to serve as a template for components which represent computers. This computer component type 420 may contain properties 424 or checks 426 which are designed to represent a generic computer. A property within the set of properties 424 may contain a name and enumerated type corresponding to the values which that property may have. As expressed above, a property within the set of properties 424 may itself be a data structure; in this case a property may contain a name and a reference to a data structure. Examples of property names and their corresponding enumerated types are depicted in properties 424 of computer component type 420. Properties 424 and checks 426 will be common to all components instantiated from computer component type 420; in other words, all components instantiated from computer component type 420 will contain properties 424 and checks 426 of computer component type 420. This computer component type 420 may be used to instantiate component 200 to represent a computer in an environment, this component's 200 properties can then be assigned values based on the attributes of the computer which component 200 is intended to represent.
Returning now to
In some embodiments, a component subtype may be defined with respect to a parent component type. This component subtype represents a specialized subgroup of the respective parent component type. A component instantiated from a component subtype may inherit all the properties and checks corresponding to its respective parent component type. Consequently, when component 200 is instantiated from a component subtype, component 200 contains all the properties and checks contained in the definition of the component subtype plus all the properties and checks contained in the definition of the parent component type.
For example, computer component type 420 may be defined to serve as a template for components which represent computers. This computer component type 420 will contain checks 426 or properties 424 which correspond to a generic computer, and will be common to all components instantiated from computer type 420. A server computer component subtype 430 may be defined with respect to parent computer component type 420. This definition may include only properties 434 and checks 436 specific to server computer component subtype 430. Consequently, when a component is instantiated from server computer component subtype 430 this component will contain all the properties 424, 434 and checks 426, 436 contained in both the parent computer component type 420 and the server computer component subtype 430. For example, if component 200 were instantiated from server computer component subtype 430, component 200 would contain the properties named “OSType”, “RAM”, and “CPU” contained in parent computer component type 420, and the property “FreeStorage” contained in server computer component subtype 430. These properties may then be assigned values.
It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art the recursive nature of this type/subtype correlation and the inheritance characteristics that accompany these correlations. For example, a subtype may be the parent type of a second subtype. In addition to containing the checks and properties defined in the second subtype, a component instantiated from the second subtype will contain the checks and properties defined in both the first subtype and the original parent. The power and flexibility of such a system will also be apparent, a component hierarchy specifically tailored to any environment can be defined from a generic component type.
As described above, relationships are used in tandem with components to model arbitrary systems and environments by representing an association or dependencies between two components. As will be readily apparent, the same reasoning that applies to components with respect to a hierarchy of types may be applied equally well to relationships. Manual instantiation of relationships may be time consuming if the representation of many dependencies or associations is necessary. Consequently, types and subtypes corresponding to a particular category of these dependencies or associations may also be defined for relationships, and relationships instantiated from these defined types and subtypes. Each relationship type may also have cardinality, such that a relationship instantiated from this relationship type may only represent an association or dependency between two particular component types or subtypes. For example, a “runs on” relationship type may be defined to exist between one component of type “application” and one component of type “server”.
All principles described with respect to types and subtypes in the context of components are equally applicable to relationships, including the principle of inheritance.
In one embodiment, a relationship may have cardinality, such that a relationship may only represent an association or dependency between particular types or particular number of components. For example, a “runs on” relationship type may be defined to only exist between one component of type “application” and one component of type “server”.
Moving on to
Database server 120 executes on server computer 110. To represent this association, relationship 640 may be named “runs on”, FirstComponentID field 360 of relationship 740 may be linked to component 620 representing database server 120, while SecondComponentID 370 may be linked with component 610 corresponding to server computer 110, and properties of relationship 640 may be defined accordingly. In this manner, the fact that database server 120 executes on server computer 110 may be modeled by relationship 640. Likewise, the fact that web server 130 also executes on server computer 110 may also be modeled. Relationship 650, also of type “runs on”, may be instantiated, given properties, and associated with components 610, 630 representing web server 130 and server computer 110 using FirstComponentID field 360 and SecondComponentID field 370. This type of data model allows changes to an environment to be accommodated with a minimum of disturbance to the model of that environment. In particular embodiments, a blueprint may be used to contain the entire representation 600 of the IT environment.
Suppose that the IT environment depicted in
Often times while modeling a particular environment logical divisions, layers or domains become apparent within that environment. These divisions or domains, which may become apparent through theoretical or empirical analysis, provide rational basis for a conceptual separation of various portions of a particular environment and therefore may serve as a solid foundation for constructing a reference model for that environment. A reference model may be defined by identifying a set of domains which suitably encompass the physical or logical entities of an environment. Components or component types with characteristic properties may be defined to represent each of these domains. Within these domains, hierarchies of component types and relationship types may then be defined which are designed to adequately represent the components and relationships of an arbitrary environment. This reference model can then be conveniently used to model multiple discrete instances of a type of environment, while still allowing the reference model to be extensible in response to any quirks, perturbations, or variations in a particular environment, without altering the underlying schema.
One glaring example of the usefulness of such approach occurs in the realm of enterprise architecture.
Initiative domain 910 may consist of component type and relationship type definitions that are intended to be used to instantiate components that represent business initiatives or objectives. Component types and subtypes belonging to initiative domain 910 may be instrumental in modeling projects in enterprise architecture 990 down to the individual task level.
In one embodiment, “initiative domain” component 1040 is defined from generic component type 1050, in turn “goal” component type 1010, “project” component type 1020, and “task” component type 1030 are defined from parent “initiative domain” component type 1040. “Consists of” relationship type 1014 may be defined between “project” component type 1020 and “task” component type 1030 to represent a connection between a project in enterprise architecture 990 and the various tasks that may comprise that project. “Supported by” relationship type 1012 may be defined between “project” component type 1020 and “goal” component type 1010 to represent the connection between projects and goals related to that project that usually manifest in an enterprise architecture. Relationship types 1012, 1014 may also be defined between component types 1010, 1020, 1020, 1040 and 1050 in initiative domain 910 and component types 1330, 1420 belonging to other domains. For example, an “affects” relationship type 1016 may be defined between “project” component type 1020 in initiative domain 910 and “application” component type 1420 belonging to application domain 940, while a “supported by” relationship type 1018 may defined between “goal” component type 1010 in initiative domain 910 and “process” component type 1330 in process domain 940. Other embodiments of component types and relationship types associated with initiative domain are explained more fully in Appendix A.
Suppose, now, that a project within enterprise architecture 990 is to release a product. This product release project is composed of a number of tasks associated with the product release including a build and a first customer shipment. The target date for the build is Sep. 7, 2004 and the target date for the first customer shipment and the product release is Mar. 7, 2005.
Relationships 1130, 1170 may be instantiated from “consists of” relationship type 1014, indicating that project component 1120 depends on “task” components 1130, 1170 representing the separate tasks of a build and a first customer shipment. “Project” component 1120 may be tied to “goal” components 1140, 1150 by “supports” relationships 1160, 1170, indicating that the project of a product release is supported by the goal dates of Sep. 7, 2004 and Mar. 7, 2005.
Returning for a moment to
A hierarchy of component types and relationship types associated with process domain 930 is represented in
Moving on,
Looking now at
It is important to note that a reference model of the type depicted in
An embodiment of a hierarchy of component types and relationship types that may be associated with policy domain 980 is represented in
Note that not all of the domains, components, component types, relationships, relationship types, properties, or property types are necessary, that domains, components, component types, relationships, relationship types, properties, or property types may be added in addition to those illustrated. Additionally, the order in which each of the activities is listed is not necessarily the order in which they are performed. After reading this specification, a person of ordinary skill in the art will be capable of determining which domains, components, component types, relationships, relationship types, properties, or property types and orderings best suit any particular objective. For example, domains such as time and finance may be added to the domains described above.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of invention.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any component(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or component of any or all the claims.
This Appendix depicts an exemplary embodiment of a reference model for use in modeling arbitrarily complex enterprise architectures. In this Appendix, the properties and property categories for a component type are shown in a table. Only the non-inherited properties are shown. The table looks like this:
In this Appendix, relationship types are defined for each component type in a table following the property definitions. The relationship table will appear with a header as follows:
The Relationship Type identifies the name of a valid relationship type.
The Label identifies the direction-sensitive phrase that describes how this component type is related to the Target Component Type. Note that the same relationship has a different Label when viewed from the Target Component Type.
The TargetComponentTypes refers to the valid destination of the relationship. Unless otherwise stated, the relationship may be associated with all subtypes of the specified Target Component Type.
In the following two tables, a relationship, of type Runs On, is declared to be valid between a Module and a Server.
Module Relationship Types
Server Relationship Types
When looking at a Server within TBS during presentation time, the user will be presented with the text:
However, when looking at a Module during presentation time, the user will be presented with the text:
The example reference model is engineered for modeling entities found within an enterprise IT environment. 8 major domains of entities may be utilized:
Collectively, these domains encompass a whole corporate IT environment. Within each domain, the TRM provides further classification by identifying a hierarchy of types, and the relationships between them.
The reference model also provides the means by which cross-domain relationships can be represented. This is arguably one of the most important aspects of the TRM. It is through these cross-domain associations that alignments between IT operational resources and strategic initiatives can be formed.
Component Types
Generic Component
The Generic Component type is an abstract component type from which all types may be derived. Each component type in the model is ultimately a descendant of this type and therefore inherits the properties defined in the Generic Component.
Generally, no component of this type should ever be created. Instead, choose one of the component types identified within one of the domains.
Initiative Domain
The Initiative Domain is the abstract base for component types representing the entities that describe business initiatives. The component types in this domain are used to model projects down to the task level.
Goal
Goal is a subtype of Initiative Domain.
This component type describes a goal or an objective.
Project
Project is a subtype of Initiative Domain.
The Project component type is used to represent a project.
Task
Task is a subtype of Initiative Domain.
Describes an element of work that is part of a Project.
Organization Domain
The Organization Domain is the abstract base for component types representing the entities that describe the people and organizations that a business is constructed of.
Enterprise
Enterprise is a subtype of Organization Domain.
An Enterprise is comprised of all the establishments that operate under the ownership or control of a single organization.
Manufacturer
Manufacturer is a subtype of Enterprise.
A Manufacturer is an organization that produces and supports software and or hardware products.
Business Unit
Business Unit is a subtype of Organization Domain.
A Business Unit describes a business area or organization within a larger corporate entity.
Group
Group is a subtype of Organization Domain.
The Group component type is used to represent a group of people.
Person
Person is a subtype of Group. That is, a person is a group of one.
Use this component type to represent a person.
Privilege
Privilege is a subtype of Organization Domain.
The Privilege component type is used to describe a particular authorization given to a person.
Role
Role is a subtype of Organization Domain.
The Role component type is used to describe a particular set of responsibilities, privileges, or functions assigned to a person.
Skill
Skill is a subtype of Organization Domain.
The Skill component type is used to describe a particular ability possessed by a person.
Process Domain
The Process Domain is the abstract base for component types representing the entities that can be used to represent business processes.
Process
Process is a subtype of Process Domain.
This component type is used to represent processes.
Process Step
Process Step is a subtype of Process Domain.
A Process Step component type is used to represent a step in a process.
Process Decision
Process Decision is a subtype of Process Step.
A Process Decision component type is used to represent a condition for determining the next action in a process.
Application Domain
The Application Domain is the abstract base type for component types representing the entities that are used to classify software assets.
Deployed Instance
Deployed Instance is a subtype of Application Domain.
Deployed Instance is an abstract base type for types that are deployed (e.g. installed software).
Application
Application is a subtype of Deployed Instance.
Application is a logical grouping of one or more instances of executable software that fulfill a set of requirements.
Database
Database is a subtype of Deployed Instance.
A Database component type is used to represent a physical data store that serves one or more applications. This subtype has been deprecated.
Data Warehouse
Data Warehouse is a subtype of Database.
The Data Warehouse component type is used to represent the physical data store used as a Data Warehouse. This subtype has been deprecated.
Module
Module is a subtype of Deployed Instance.
A Module component type is used to describe an instance of installed software that implements single or multiple functional capabilities.
Commercial Module
Commercial Module is a subtype of Module.
A Commercial Module component type is used to describe an instance of an installed commercial software
Software Server
Commercial Software Server is a subtype of Commercial Module.
A Commercial Software Server component type is used to describe a network-addressable module that runs on a physical server. Various subtypes of software servers include database servers, application servers, web servers, etc.
Application Server
Application Server is a subtype of Software Server.
The Application Server component type is used to represent the Application Server class of Software Servers. Examples of Application Servers include WebLogic and Web Sphere.
Web Server
Web Server is a subtype of Software Server.
The Web Server component type is used to represent the Web Server class of Software Servers. Examples of Web Servers include IIS and Apache.
File Server
File Server is a subtype of Software Server.
The File Server component type is used to represent the File Server class of Software Servers.
Database Server
Database Server is a subtype of Software Server.
The Database Server component type is used to represent the Database Server class of Software Servers. Examples of Database Servers include Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server.
Custom Module
Custom Module is a subtype of Module.
A Custom Module component type is used to describe an instance of a custom written software-based component that is used as a part of an Application.
Software Product
Software Product is a subtype of Application Domain.
It describes a particular kind of software (e.g. a software product) that is either offered commercially or custom developed. This subtype is not intended to represent a particular deployment of the software product, but rather represents the product in general as a class (e.g. Microsoft produces Word where Word is an instance of the type Software Product.)
Software Product Version
Software Product Version is a subtype of Application Domain.
A Software Product Version represents a particular version of a kind of Software Product (e.g. a version of a software product) that is either offered commercially or custom developed. This subtype is not intended to represent a particular deployment of the software product, but rather represents the product version in general as a class (e.g. Microsoft produces Word 2000 where Word 2000 is an instance of the type Software Product Version.)
Software Patch
Software Patch is a subtype of Application Domain.
It describes a modification to software that corrects an error or weakness. This subtype is not intended to represent a specific deployment of the software patch,
Infrastructure Domain
The Infrastructure Domain is the abstract base type for component types representing the portion of the IT environment dedicated to infrastructure assets such as physical hardware.
Hardware Product
Hardware Product is a subtype of the Hardware Domain.
Hardware Product describes a particular kind of hardware that is either offered commercially or custom developed. This subtype is not intended to represent a particular deployment of the hardware product, but rather represents the product as a class (e.g. Dell produces the Latitude C600 where Latitude C600 is an instance of the subtype Hardware Product.)
Hardware
Hardware is a subtype of Infrastructure Domain.
The Hardware Subtype represents the physical deployed instance of a hardware product.
Cabinet
Cabinet is a subtype of Hardware.
Use the Cabinet component type to represent server cabinets.
Computing Hardware
Computing Hardware is a subtype of Hardware.
The Computing Hardware component type represents a class of components that is based on computing capabilities.
Network Device
Network Device is a subtype of Computing Hardware.
Use the Network Device component type to describe a device that is directly connected to a network.
Storage Device
Storage Device is a subtype Network Device.
Use the Storage Device component type to represent a stand-alone device that stores data.
Disk Array
Disk Array is a subtype of Storage Device.
Use the Disk Array component type to describe a storage device that stores data on disk drives.
Backup Device
Backup Device is a subtype of Storage Device.
Use the Backup Device component type to describe a storage device that uses removable media to archive data.
Tape Backup
Tape Backup is a subtype of Backup Device.
Use the Tape Backup component type to describe a backup device that stores data onto a tape for archival.
Firewall
Firewall is a subtype of Network Device.
Use the Firewall component type to describe a network device that provides filtered network access.
Load Balancer
Load Balancer is a subtype of Network Device.
Use the Load Balancer component type to describe a network device that provides load-balancing services.
Router
Router is a subtype of Network Device.
Use the Router component type to describe a network device that connects one or more networks.
Switch
Switch is a subtype of Network Device.
Use the Switch component type to describe a network device that manages one or more networks and/or network data types.
SAN Switch
SAN Switch is a subtype of Switch.
Use the SAN Switch component type to describe a device that manages a set of SANs.
Computer
Computer is a subtype of Computing Hardware.
Use the Computer component type to describe a general-purpose computing device.
Server
Server is a subtype of Computer.
Use the Server component type to describe a computing device that hosts one more software services.
Mainframe
Mainframe is a subtype of Server.
Use the Mainframe component type to represent a legacy computing device that hosts many software services.
Desktop
Desktop is a subtype of Computer.
A Desktop component type is used to describe a computing device that performs work for an individual and is typically installed in a fixed location.
Laptop
Laptop is a subtype of Computer.
A Laptop component type is used to describe a computing device that performs work for an individual and is typically considered to be portable. It contains a display device and keyboard in an integrated unit.
Network
Network is a subtype of Infrastructure Domain.
Use the Network component type to describe a set of devices that enable communication via TCP/IP, NetBios, or other network protocol.
SAN
SAN is a subtype of Network.
Use the SAN component type to describe a storage area network.
Network Interface
Network Interface is a subtype of Infrastructure Domain.
A Network Interface is used to represent the physical connection point onto a network. A likely subtype of Network Interface would be a Network Interface Card, or NIC.
Location Domain
The location Domain is the abstract base type for component types representing the place where components are located.
Location
Location is a subtype of Location Domain.
Use the Location component type to describe a physical location with an address.
Data Center
Data Center is a subtype of Location.
Use the Data Center component type to describe a building where computing devices are physically located.
Geography
Geography is a subtype of Location Domain.
Use the Geography component type to describe general properties applicable to both Regions and Countries.
Region
Region is a subtype of Geography.
Use the Region component type to represent a geographic region containing one or more states or countries.
Country
Country is a subtype of Geography.
Use the Country component type to represent a geographic country.
Data Domain
The component types that are descendants of the Data Domain are used to describe any entity that represents an information asset of the enterprise.
Datastore
Datastore is a subtype of Data Domain.
Describes the logical media on which information assets are stored.
Database
Database is a subtype of Datastore.
A Database component type is used to represent a physical data store that serves one or more applications.
Data Warehouse
Data Warehouse is a subtype of Database.
The Data Warehouse component type is used to represent a subject-oriented, integrated, time-variant, non-volatile store of data collected from other systems that becomes the foundation for decision support and data analysis.
VSAM
VSAM is a subtype of Datastore.
A VSAM component type is used to represent an IBM VSAM data store that serves one or more applications.
Partitioned Dataset
Partitioned Dataset a subtype of Datastore.
A Partitioned Dataset component type is used to represent an IBM PDS data store that serves one or more applications.
File
File is a subtype of Datastore.
A File component type is used to represent a physical data store that represents a single sequential file.
QSAM
QSAM is a subtype of File.
A QSAM component type is used to represent a physical data store that represents a single QSAM sequential file.
XML File
XML File is a subtype of File.
A XML File component type is used to represent a physical data store that represents a single sequential file containing XML data.
Record Oriented File
Record Oriented File is a subtype of File.
A Record Oriented File component type is used to represent a physical data store that represents a single sequential file containing records with fields.
Data Object
Data Object is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Data Object component type is used to represent a data elements of a database.
Table
Table is a subtype of Data Object.
The Table component type is used to represent a named set of rows in a database.
View
View is a subtype of Data Object.
The View component type is used to represent a named set of rows in a database.
Stored Procedure
A Stored Procedure is a subtype of Data Object.
The Stored Procedure component type is used to represent function or procedure stored in a schema
Trigger
A Trigger is a subtype of Data Object.
The Trigger component type is used to represent a named rule in a schema
Index
An Index is a subtype of Data Object.
The Index component type is used to represent a cross references into a table or a views in a schema
Synonym
A Synonym is a subtype of Data Object.
The Synonym component type is used to alias data objects in a schema
Type
A Type is a subtype of Data Object.
The Type component type is used to represent classes of data in a schema
Oracle Data Object
Oracle Data Object is a subtype of Data Object.
An Oracle Data Object component type is used to represent a data objects specific to Oracle databases
SQL Server Data Object
SQL Server Data Object is a subtype of Data Object.
A SQL Server Data Object component type is used to represent a data objects specific to Microsoft SQL Server databases
DB2 Server Data Object
DB2 Data Object is a subtype of Data Object.
A DB2 Data Object component type is used to represent a data objects specific to Microsoft SQL Server databases
Schema
Schema is a subtype of Data Domain.
A schema component type is used to represent a named group of data.
Data Grant
Data Grant is a subtype of Data Domain.
A data grant component type is used to represent the authorization to execute a given operation n a Data Object.
Data Role
Data Role is a subtype of Data Domain.
A data role component type is used to represent a named user (person or program) who accesses data.
Data Login
Data Login is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Data Login component type is used to represent the name used to gain access to data.
Tablespace
Tablespace is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Tablespace component type is used to represent a logical group of data files.
Column
Column is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Column component type is used to represent columns in a relational database.
Record
Record is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Record component type is used to represent records in a Record Oriented File.
Field
Field is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Field component type is used to represent records in a Record Oriented File.
Constraint
Constraint is a subtype of Data Domain.
A Constraint component type is used to represent the named rule that identifies sets of valid data values.
Unique Key Constraint
Unique Key Constraint is a subtype of Constraint.
A Unique Key Constraint component type is used to represent the named rule that identifies sets of valid data values.
Primary Key Constraint
Primary Key Constraint is a subtype of Constraint.
A Primary Key Constraint component type is used to represent the named rule that identifies sets of valid data values.
Foreign Key Constraint
Foreign Key Constraint is a subtype of Constraint.
A Foreign Key Constraint component type is used to represent the named rule that identifies sets of valid data values.
Check Constraint
Check Constraint is a subtype of Constraint.
A Check Constraint component type is used to represent the named rule that identifies sets of valid data values.
Set of Values
Set of Values is a subtype of Constraint.
A Set of Values component type is used to represent the set of valid data values. It is recommended that subtypes be created from this subtype to define specifics of the set of valid values that apply.
Policy Domain
The component types within the Policy Domain are used to describe the plans, principles, obligations, agreements, contracts, and requirements which guide the management of the enterprise.
Property Types
Custom property types may be created to be utilized with the reference model. For example:
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5572732 | Fant et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 6226792 | Goiffon | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6442557 | Buteau et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6509898 | Chi | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6529909 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6611838 | Ignat et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6662188 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7124180 | Ranous | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7428546 | Nori et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7698683 | Miller | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 20030088551 | Tong | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110253 | Anuszczyk | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177481 | Amaru | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187826 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208367 | Aizenbud-Reshef et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212640 | Andresen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002818 | Kulp | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049509 | Keller | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073655 | Kan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111513 | Shen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225791 | Keskar et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260706 | Anonsen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050033762 | Kasravi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138039 | Hagen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203920 | Deng | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060106796 | Venkataraman | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136437 | Yamasaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167927 | Edelstein | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195460 | Nori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212487 | Kennis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277022 | Pulfer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294148 | Brunet | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070192415 | Pak | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282916 | Albahari et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20100169380 | Miller | Jul 2010 | A1 |
