The invention relates to a method and a system for acquisition of seismic data. The method and system may include installation of sensors placed in non-vertical wellbores resulting in vertically separated detectors to record upgoing and downgoing acoustic waves. The method and system may include deghosting.
Land seismic data acquisition and processing may be used to generate a profile of the geophysical structure under the surface of the earth. Those trained in the field can use the profile to predict the presence or absence of hydrocarbon accumulations or other geological features. Thus, a high-resolution profile, without error, is frequently preferred over a profile of low-resolution or having a larger margin of error.
Traditionally, a land seismic survey involves the use of seismic sensors and a seismic source. The sensors (e.g., geophones, hydrophones, accelerometers, etc.) are connected to each other and then deployed on or below the surface of the earth. The seismic source is activated and generates seismic waves which propagate through the subsurface until they are reflected and/or refracted by various heterogeneities in the subsurface. The reflected and/or refracted waves propagate to the seismic sensors, where they are recorded. The recorded seismic waves may be used, among other things, for seismic monitoring of producing oil fields if the seismic surveys are repeated over time.
Seismic repeatability, a measure of the fidelity with which a seismic survey is repeated and therefore of its ultimate resolution of changes with time, may be improved when sources and sensors are buried. However, such configuration results in a part of the wave field being reflected in a manner that provides noise. For example, an upwardly directed wave may be transmitted through the weathering layer and reflected at the surface of the earth before observation by the sensor. These surface reflected waves, often called “ghosts,” are affected by the near surface variations and can change over time. The presence of surface reflected waves that fluctuate in time due to temperature and moisture variation in the near-surface may interfere with observations of waves coming from the reservoir or other formations of interest thereby preventing accurate measurement of small reservoir variations.
Techniques for “deghosting” the observations have been developed for both marine and land-based observations. Deghosting sometimes involves placement of vertically spaced sensor arrays (e.g., sensor pairs). By comparing the timing at which various waves are detected at the sensor arrays, it can be determined which of the signals are ghosts and which contains useful seismic data. On land, a wellbore is drilled for each vertically-spaced sensor array. The drilling of a vertical hole for each receiver station with a set of vertically separated receivers per receiver station results in a large drilling effort with high costs and a large environmental imprint.
In one aspect there is provided a method and a system comprising a sensor in a first wellbore segment in a formation and providing a sensor in a second wellbore segment in the formation. The first wellbore segment and the second wellbore segment are separated by a (non-zero) distance and at least one of these wellbore segments is non-vertical. Preferably both the first wellbore segment and the second wellbore segment are non-vertical. The sensor in the first wellbore segment and the sensor in the second wellbore segment intersect a vertical line in the formation. The method may further include observing upgoing acoustic waves or downgoing acoustic waves with the sensors and separating the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from a total wavefield. The system may further include a readout system for observing the upgoing acoustic waves or downgoing acoustic waves with the sensors, and a computer processor adapted to separate the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from the total wavefield.
The figures are schematic only, and not drawn to scale. Identical reference numbers used in different figures correspond to similar components, elements, or features.
As compared with traditional methods, the methods described herein allow for the replacement of the numerous vertical wellbores with corresponding imaginary vertical wellbores. Essentially, sensors at varying depths approximately intersect a vertical line through the formation. Such configuration may reduce the environmental impact of the numerous vertical wellbores and also provide a cost savings in drilling of the wellbores. Additionally, the methods described herein may provide cost savings with respect to the configuration of the communications lines between the various sensors and the corresponding collection point of data observed by such sensors.
Referring now to the drawings,
Each of the wellbore segments in the first set 12 has at least one sensor 16 therein, and each of the wellbore segments in the second set 14 has at least one sensor 18 therein. The sensors may be placed in the wellbore segments according to known methods, but the placement of the sensors may be selected based on the teachings of this disclosure. As illustrated in
Pairs of sensors (whether point sensors or channels in distributed acoustic sensors) consisting of one sensor 16a in one first wellbore segment 12 and one sensor 18a in one second wellbore segment 14, intersect a vertical line 17 in the formation. The sensors may be aligned such that an observation can be made from the first set 12 and from the second set 14 at points within a predetermined proximity of one another. As illustrated in
Referring now to
The source 22 may be located within a wellbore, which may suitably be one of wellbores that comprises the first or second wellbore segment.
The method may include observing upgoing acoustic waves and/or downgoing acoustic waves with the sensors, and separating the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from a total wavefield. The method may further include generating deghosted data from the separated upgoing and downgoing acoustic waves. For example, a substantially deghosted scattered acoustic wavefield in a spectral domain may be created. Further, the substantially deghosted scattered acoustic wavefield may be transformed to a space-time domain, using known methods, such as described in U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0103606 to Fokkema et al. and U.S. Patent Publication 2014/0092708 to Cotton et al. which are both hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Said deghosted data may correct or otherwise filter waves created with interference from the surface of the earth 28. A computer processor 8 may be provided to receive data representing the observed upgoing or downgoing waves as observed by the sensors and to separate the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from the total wave field.
In a variation, the source 22 may not be one that is activated to transmit waves but may instead be a passive or natural source such as micro-seismic. Similarly, the source 22 may not be separate from the sensors and the wellbores but may be a virtual source, such as is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,706,211; 6,747,915; and 7,046,581, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The pairing of sensors in the first and second wellbore segments allows for a vertical sensor alignment (illustrated by line 17 in
Suitably, the first wellbore segment is comprised in one wellbore of the first set of wellbores whereby the second wellbore segment is comprised in one wellbore of the second set of wellbores. It will be understood that the first set of wellbores and the second set of wellbores may each consist of one or more wellbores. It will be understood that the wellbore(s) in the second set of wellbores may be separate from the wellbore(s) in the first set of wellbores in the sense that these wellbores never cross each other within the subsurface formation (i.e. they are fully separated from each other by the formation).
Referring now to
Nonetheless, the invention can be embodied using two non-vertical wellbore segments which do not both lie within a single vertical plane. This configuration can yield one point of vertical alignment if the non-vertical wellbore segments are not parallel to one another and the wellbore segments are separated from each other by a distance. More points of vertical alignment can be achieved by increasing the number of wellbores. Assuming each wellbore has one wellbore segment in which the sensors are configured and assuming there M straight wellbore sections in the first set of wellbores and N straight wellbore sections in the second set of wellbores, then mathematically, the number of points of vertical alignment can advantageously exceed the number of wellbores if the condition M+N>4 is met, wherein both M and N are natural numbers greater than one.
Alternatively, an entire line of vertically aligned points can be achieved if both wellbore segments are non-vertical and both lie within a single vertical plane and are separated from each other by a distance.
While
Referring now to
In addition to the configurations indicated above, other spiral, grid, slanted grid, or other configurations may be used to geometrically optimize spacing and provide maximum illumination and/or minimum borehole length. For example, where the receiver ghost is varying slowly in the horizontal direction, the wellbores may have variations in vertical depth, either slanted boreholes, sinusoidally shaped boreholes in a vertical plane or helically shaped boreholes. In any event, by combining measurements from adjacent sensors located at different depths, it may be possible to obtain an estimate of the receiver ghost.
As illustrated, sensors 16 and 18 are only present in locations where an intersection 30 is expected. However, it should be noted that additional sensors may be included, particularly when using distributed acoustic sensors, such that additional measurements may be taken, providing potentially enhanced data. For example, observations may be taken at very short intervals, such as every 4 meters or even shorter along a borehole.
Additional variations may be included without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. For example, while first and second sets of wellbores are illustrated, similar advantages may be attained using only first and second wellbore segments. Thus, a method may include providing a sensor in a first wellbore segment and providing a sensor in a second wellbore segment before observing acoustic waves with the sensors. In such method, the two sensors may both be part of a distributed acoustic or other sensor or they may be separate sensing apparatus. The observed acoustic waves may include upgoing acoustic waves and/or downgoing acoustic waves and the method may involve separating the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from a total wavefield. Likewise, acoustic waves may be replaced with other wave types, including shear or elastic waves. As with the wellbore sets described above, the first and second well segments may be separated by a distance and the segments may be non-parallel to one another. Such segments could be located within a single wellbore, e.g., when the configuration of that wellbore would allow for the wellbore segments to otherwise provide the characteristics described above (e.g. non-vertical and/or non-parallel, and separated by a distance). Notably, for such a configuration, segments in a wellbore are deemed parallel if those segments both lie along a line or in a vertical plane. Alternatively, such segments could be located in separate wellbores, each of which is part of a set of wellbores as described above.
The term “horizontal” as used herein is not intended to mean strictly orthogonal to a vertical orientation but is meant to include many different non-vertical wellbores. Specifically, “horizontal” should include all wellbores more than 45 degrees deviated from vertical, as well as wellbores having a horizontal reach that is substantially larger than the vertical reach. For example, slanted wells may be deemed horizontal wells.
The term “wellbore” as used herein is not intended to be limited to boreholes that perform the function of a well such as producing fluids from the formation such as water and/or mineral hydrocarbon fluids. Rather, wellbore is used as pars pro toto intended to include any type of borehole drilled within the formation.
It is believed that various advantages may flow from the designs of the current disclosure. For example, the use of distributed acoustic sensors, including helically wound cable, may allow for a significantly reduced number of communication lines as compared with present methods which require at least one communication line running from each vertical wellbore (i.e., one communication line for every sensor-pair location). The designs disclosed above may allow for a reduction in communication lines as compared to conventional methods. Additionally, when using distributed acoustic sensing, fewer sensors may be used. Another potential advantage is fewer wellbores being drilled. In the presently disclosed methods, the intersections provide data similar to what might be attained in a vertical well, but with fewer wells. As indicated in one example above, 7 wells in the first set and 7 wells in the second set provides 49 intersections or points whereby sensors are placed in a stacked configuration. To attain similar data with vertical wells would require the drilling of 49 wells, instead of only 14. Since each well has a surface footprint, the environmental benefits from the reduction in the number of wellbores are clear.
In summary, the method disclosed herein may include providing a sensor in a first wellbore segment, providing a sensor in a second wellbore segment, observing upgoing acoustic waves and/or downgoing acoustic waves with the sensors, and separating the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from a total wavefield. The first wellbore segment and the second wellbore segment may be separated by a distance. At least one of the wellbore segments may be non-vertical and/or the first wellbore segment may not be parallel to the second wellbore segment. The first wellbore segment may be part of a first set of wellbores and the second wellbore segment may be part of a second set of wellbores. The separated upgoing and downgoing acoustic waves may be used to generate deghosted data.
Certain embodiments of the method disclosed herein are optionally summarized in the following clauses:
Clause 1: a method comprising:
providing a sensor in a first wellbore segment;
providing a sensor in a second wellbore segment; and
observing upgoing acoustic waves or downgoing acoustic waves with the sensors; and
separating the upgoing acoustic waves and/or the downgoing acoustic waves from a total wave field;
wherein the first wellbore segment and the second wellbore segment are separated by a distance; and
wherein the first wellbore segment is not parallel to the second wellbore segment and/or
wherein at least one of the wellbore segments is non-vertical.
Clause 2: the method of Clause 1, wherein the first wellbore segment is part of a first set of wellbores, wherein the second wellbore segment is part of a second set of wellbores.
Clause 3: the method of Clause 1, comprising generating deghosted data from the separated upgoing and downgoing acoustic waves.
Clause 4: the method of Clause 3, wherein generating deghosted data comprises generating a substantially deghosted scattered acoustic wavefield.
Clause 5: the method of Clause 1, further comprising, before observing, activating a source configured to transmit acoustic waves into a formation of interest, wherein the upgoing acoustic waves and the downgoing acoustic waves originate at the source.
Clause 6: the method of Clause 5, wherein the source is a virtual source.
Clause 7: the method of Clause 1, wherein each sensor comprises a distributed acoustic sensor.
Clause 8: the method of Clause 7, wherein each sensor is helically wound in a cable disposed in the corresponding wellbore segment.
Clause 9: the method of Clause 1, wherein the first wellbore segment and the second wellbore segment are substantially horizontal.
Clause 10: the method of Clause 2, wherein the first set of wellbores comprises 4 wellbores and wherein the second set of wellbores comprises 3 wellbores.
Clause 11: the method of Clause 2, wherein the first set of wellbores comprises 7 wellbores and wherein the second set of wellbores comprises 7 wellbores.
Clause 12: the method of Clause 2, wherein the first set of wellbores are substantially parallel to one another and wherein the second set of wellbores are substantially parallel to one another.
Clause 13: the method of Clause 1, wherein each of the wellbore segments are nonlinear.
Clause 14: the method of Clause 1, wherein at least one of the wellbore segments comprises a sinusoidal or helical shape.
Clause 15: the method of Clause 1 or Clause 13, wherein the first wellbore segment and the second wellbore segment are located within a single wellbore.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that many modifications and variations are possible in terms of the disclosed embodiments, configurations, materials, and methods without departing from their scope. Accordingly, the scope of the claims and their functional equivalents should not be limited by the particular examples described and illustrated, as these are merely representative in nature and elements described separately may be optionally combined.
The present application is a National Stage (§ 371) application of PCT/US2015/049451, filed Sep. 10, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/050,564, filed Sep. 15, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/049451 | 9/10/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/044060 | 3/24/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6065538 | Reimers | May 2000 | A |
6643590 | Wiggins | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6747915 | Calvert | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7046581 | Calvert | May 2006 | B2 |
7120541 | Wang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7706211 | Bakulin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8681583 | Kratz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9354341 | Beasley | May 2016 | B2 |
9494461 | Hornman | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9880047 | Martin | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20020103606 | Fokkema et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20060221768 | Hall et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262645 | Van Baaren | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070195643 | Bakulin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20120024051 | Lopez et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130201792 | Douma | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140092708 | Cotton et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140257705 | Levin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140345388 | Den Boer et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20170212256 | Friedly | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/049451, dated Dec. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170285204 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62050564 | Sep 2014 | US |