This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/172,212, entitled DYNAMIC LOCATION-BASED MEDIA COLLECTION AGGREGATION, which was filed Jun. 29, 2011, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates to aggregating media collection catalogs of users.
Today, applications such as Apple® iTunes® enable users to share their media collections over a Local Area Network (LAN). However, these applications have significant shortcomings in that they are restricted by the network boundaries of the LAN. For example, once a user device is disconnected from the LAN, the media items stored by that user device are no longer accessible to the other user devices connected to the LAN. Likewise, the user device that has disconnected from the LAN no longer has access to the media items stored by the other user devices that are connected to the LAN. Thus, there is a need for a system and method for sharing media collections that are not limited by network boundaries.
The present disclosure relates to cloud-based systems and methods for aggregating media collections of users. In one embodiment, in order to generate an aggregate media collection catalog of a first user, a cloud-based media aggregation system identifies one or more second users that have an identifier that is the same as an identifier of the first user for purposes of media collection aggregation. The media aggregation system then aggregates media collection catalogs of the one or more second users with a media collection catalog of the first user to thereby provide an aggregate media collection catalog of the first user.
In another embodiment, in order to generate an aggregate media collection catalog of a first user, a cloud-based media aggregation system identifies one or more second users that have a same base network as the first user for purposes of media collection aggregation. In one embodiment, the base network is a Local Area Network (LAN). The media aggregation system then aggregates media collection catalogs of the one or more second users with a media collection catalog of the first user regardless of whether user devices of the first user and the one or more second users are connected to the base network to thereby provide an aggregate media collection catalog of the first user.
In one embodiment, after generating the aggregate media collection catalog of the first user, the media aggregation system stores the aggregate media collection catalog of the first user. In addition or alternatively, the media aggregation system sends the aggregate media collection catalog of the first user to the user device of the first user for utilization at the first user's user device. For example, the user device may play media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog, create a playlist of media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the first user to browse media items in the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the first user to select a media item from the aggregate media collection catalog for playback, enable the first user to create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the first user to purchase media items in the aggregate media collection catalog, and/or the like.
In another embodiment, a cloud-based media aggregation system determines that a first user and one or more second users are geographically proximate to one another. In response, the media aggregation system dynamically aggregates at least a portion of media collection catalogs of the one or more second users with a media collection catalog of the first user to provide an aggregate media collection catalog of the first user. The media aggregation system may control an extent of the aggregation based on pre-defined criteria. In one embodiment, the aggregate media collection catalog is stored. In addition or alternatively, the aggregate media collection catalog is sent to a user device of the first user for utilization by the user device of the first user. In one embodiment, the media collection catalogs of the one or more second users are retained in the aggregate media collection catalog of the first user at least temporarily after the first user and the one or more second users are no longer geographically proximate to one another.
In yet another embodiment, a cloud-based media aggregation system determines that a user device of a first user and user devices of one or more second users are connected to the same Local Area Network (LAN). In response, the media aggregation system dynamically aggregates at least a portion of media collection catalogs of the one or more second users with a media collection catalog of the first user to provide an aggregate media collection catalog of the first user. The media aggregation system may control an extent of the aggregation based on pre-defined criteria. In one embodiment, the aggregate media collection catalog is stored. In addition or alternatively, the aggregate media collection catalog is sent to a user device of the first user for utilization by the user device of the first user. In one embodiment, the media collection catalogs of the one or more second users are retained in the aggregate media collection catalog of the first user at least temporarily after the user device of the first user disconnects from the LAN.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
The present disclosure relates to cloud-based systems and methods for aggregating media collections of users. In one embodiment, in order to generate an aggregate media collection catalog of a first user, a cloud-based media aggregation system identifies one or more second users that have an identifier that is the same as an identifier of the first user for purposes of media collection aggregation. The media aggregation system then aggregates media collection catalogs of the one or more second users with a media collection catalog of the first user to thereby provide an aggregate media collection catalog of the first user. The common identifier of the first and the one or more second users may, as discussed below, be the identifier of the same base network identified for purposes of media collection aggregation. However, the common identifier of the first and second users is not limited thereto. Other types of identifiers may be used for media collection aggregation. For example, the common identifier of the first and second users may be an identifier used by the first and the one or more second users for a service such as, for example, the Apple iTunes® Store. Other types of identifiers will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this disclosure and such identifiers are considered within the scope of the present disclosure.
The CMAS 12 is implemented as a single server computer or as a number of server computers operating in a collective fashion for purposes of load sharing and/or redundancy. The CMAS 12 includes an aggregation function 20 and a user accounts repository 22. The aggregation function 20 is preferably, but not necessarily, implemented in software and executed by a controller (e.g., a Central Processing Unit (CPU)) of the server computer(s) implementing the CMAS 12. In general, the aggregation function 20 operates to manage the user accounts repository 22 and, as discussed below, aggregate media collections of the users 16.
The user accounts repository 22 generally operates to store a user account for each of the users 16. In one embodiment, the users 16 may be required to establish user accounts at the CMAS 12 via, for example, a registration process. Each user account preferably includes a local media collection catalog that includes a listing of media items in a local media collection stored by the user device 14 of the user 16. In addition, in some embodiments, the user 16 may have more than one user device in which case the user account of the user 16 may include a local media collection catalog for each of the user devices 14 of the user 16. Further, as discussed below, the user account of the user 16 also includes an aggregate media collection catalog for the user 16.
The user devices 14 may each be any type of user device having networking and media playback capabilities. For example, each of the user devices 14 may be a personal computer, a portable media player such as an Apple® iPod® media player, a mobile telecommunications device such as an Apple® iPhone®, a tablet computer such as an Apple® iPad® device, a set-top box, or the like. As illustrated, the user devices 14-1 through 14-N include media player functions 24-1 through 24-N (generally referred to herein collectively as media player functions 24 and individually as media player function 24) and local media collections 26-1 through 26-N (generally referred to herein collectively as local media collections 26 and individually as local media collection 26), respectively. In this exemplary embodiment, CMAS clients 28-1 through 28-N (generally referred to herein collectively as CMAS clients 28 and individually as CMAS client 28) are embedded within the media player functions 24-1 through 24-N, respectively.
For each of the user devices 14, the corresponding media player function 24 may be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination thereof and generally operates to provide playback of media items from the local media collection 26 and, as discussed below, media items from an aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 obtained from the CMAS 12. In this exemplary embodiment, the CMAS client 28 is embedded within the media player function 24. However, the present invention is not limited thereto. The CMAS client 28 may alternatively be implemented separately from the media player function 24. For example, the CMAS client 28 may be implemented as a plug-in for the media player function 24.
As discussed below, the CMAS client 28 generally operates to interact with the CMAS 12 to obtain and update an aggregate media collection catalog for the user 16. The aggregate media collection catalog generally includes an aggregate listing of media items in the local media collection 26 stored by the user device 14 of the user 16 and one of the following: (1) media items in one or more of the local media collections 26 stored by the user devices 14 of one or more other users 16 and (2) media items in aggregate media collection catalogs of one or more other users 16. In addition, if the user 16 has more than one user device 14, the aggregate listing of media items may also include media items in the local media collections 26 stored by each of the other user devices 14 of the user 16. The media player function 24 may then utilize the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. For example, the media player function 24 may play a media item from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to select a media item for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to purchase a media item in the aggregate media collection catalog, and/or the like.
The local media collection 26 includes a number of media items stored locally by the user device 14. These media items may include media items previously purchased by the user 16 from a remote media distribution service such as, for example, the Apple® iTunes® store. In addition or alternatively, the local media collection 26 may include media items imported from Compact Discs (CDs), Digital Video Discs (DVD), and/or the like. As used herein, a media item is an audio content item such as a song, audio book, or audio podcast; a video content item such as a movie, episode of a television program, or a video clip; or the like.
Before proceeding, it should be noted that while in the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
As discussed below in detail, the user devices 14-1 through 14-3 are registered with the CMAS 12. The CMAS clients 28-1 through 28-3 of the user devices 14-1 through 14-3 upload the local media collection catalogs for the local media collections 26-1 through 26-3 stored by the user devices 14-1 through 14-3 of the users 16-1 through 16-3 to the CMAS 12 where the local media collection catalogs are stored in the user accounts of the users 16-1 through 16-3. In addition, the LAN 32 is identified as a base network of the users 16-1 through 16-3. For example, in one embodiment, the user premises 30 is a home of the users 16-1 through 16-3, and the users 16-1 through 16-3 identify the LAN 32 as their base network. Alternatively, the CMAS 12 may automatically identify the base network of the users 16-1 through 16-3 by, for example, detecting that the user devices 14-1 through 14-3 of the users 16-1 through 16-3 are typically connected to the LAN 32.
The CMAS 12 aggregates the local media collection catalog for the user device 14-1 of the user 16-1 with the local media collection catalogs for the user devices 14-2 and 14-3 of the other users 16-2 and 16-3 having the same base network to provide the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-1. Likewise, the CMAS 12 aggregates the local media collection catalog for the user device 14-2 of the user 16-2 with the local media collection catalogs for the user devices 14-1 and 14-3 of the other users 16-1 and 16-3 having the same base network to provide the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-2. In addition, the CMAS 12 aggregates the local media collection catalog for the user device 14-3 of the user 16-3 with the local media collection catalogs for the user devices 14-1 and 14-2 of the other users 16-1 and 16-2 having the same base network to provide the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
Importantly, the CMAS 12 enables the users 16-1 through 16-3 to maintain their aggregate media collection catalogs even if the users 16-1 through 16-3 leave the user premises 30 and are no longer connected to the LAN 32. For example, as illustrated in
Continuing the example of
Once the users 16-3 and 16-4 are determined to be in geographic proximity to one another, the CMAS 12 aggregates at least a portion of a media collection catalog of the user 16-4 with the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. The media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is either the local media collection catalog for the user device 14-4 of the user 16-4 or the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-4. In this manner, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 is now an aggregate of the local media collection catalogs of the user devices 14-1 and 14-2 of the other users 16-1 and 16-2 having the same base network and at least a portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4.
An extent to which the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 may be controlled by the CMAS 12 based on one or more predefined criteria. The one or more predefined criteria may include, for example, an amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 have been or are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another, a location or type of location (e.g., a Point of Interest (POI) or a type of POI) at which the users 16-3 and 16-4 are located, a system-defined aggregation value, a user-configurable aggregation value, and/or the like. More specifically, the CMAS 12 may track the amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 remain in geographic proximity to one another. Initially, only a portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 may be aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. For example, only those media item entries from the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 that most closely match predefined media preferences of the user 16-3 may be aggregated. The predefined media preferences of the user 16-3 may be stored in the user account of the user 16-3 and obtained using any suitable technology (e.g., manually by the user 16-3 and/or based on an analysis of the local media collection catalog of the user device 14-3 of the user 16-3). Then, as the amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 are in geographic proximity to one another increases, more of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 may be aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
In addition or alternatively, the CMAS 12 may determine an amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another and then select all or a portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 to aggregate into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 based on the amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another. For example, if the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another for a short amount of time (e.g., less than 10 minutes), then the CMAS 12 may select a portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 that most closely matches predefined media preferences of the user 16-3 to aggregate into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. In contrast, if the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another for a long amount of time (e.g., greater than 1 hour), then the CMAS 12 may aggregate the entire media collection catalog of the user 16-4 into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
The CMAS 12 may use any appropriate technique for determining the amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another. For example, the CMAS 12 may maintain or otherwise have access to historical information regarding previous geographic locations of the users 16-3 and 16-4 with corresponding time stamps that define times at which the users 16-3 and 16-4 were at those previous geographic locations. Using this information, the CMAS 12 may determine whether the users 16-3 and 16-4 have previously been located at their current locations and, if so, the amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 have historically remained at their current location. As another example, the CMAS 12 may have access to electronic calendars of the users 16-3 and 16-4. If the users 16-3 and 16-4 are currently scheduled to participate in a meeting scheduled for one hour, then the CMAS 12 may determine that the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity for one hour. Again, the exemplary techniques for determining the amount of time that the users 16-3 and 16-4 are expected to be in geographic proximity discussed above are exemplary and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Other suitable techniques may be used.
The CMAS 12 may additionally or alternatively use a POI or POI type that corresponds to the geographic locations of the users 16-3 and 16-4 to control an extent to which the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. For instance, there may be system-defined or user-defined rules that control the extent to which the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. For example, the user 16-3 may configure a rule that states that if the user 16-3 is located at a movie theater, then only the portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 that most closely matches predefined media preferences of the user 16-3 is to be aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. In contrast, the user 16-3 may configure another rule that states that if the user 16-3 is located at a night club, then the entire media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is to be aggregated with the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
Lastly, the CMAS 12 may additionally or alternatively use a system-defined or user-configurable aggregation value to control the extent to which the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. For instance, if the aggregation value is set to a maximum value, then the entire media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. In contrast, if the aggregation value is set to a minimum value, then the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 is not aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 at all. For intermediate aggregation values, the aggregation value may control a degree to which the media item entries in the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 must match predefined media preferences of the user 16-3 before they are aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
At some point, the users 16-3 and 16-4 are no longer geographically proximate to one another. In the preferred embodiment, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 temporarily retains the portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 even after the users 16-3 and 16-4 are no longer geographically proximate to one another. For instance, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 temporarily retains the portion of the media collection catalog of the user 16-4 aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 for a predefined amount of time (e.g., 1 hour) after the users 16-3 and 16-4 are no longer geographically proximate to one another. In this manner, media collection catalogs of other users that are geographically proximate to the user 16-3, such as the user 16-4, are dynamically aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
Continuing the example of
At some point, the user 16-3 leaves the second user premises 36 such that the user device 14-3 is no longer connected to the LAN 38. In the preferred embodiment, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 temporarily retains the portion of the media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 even after the user 16-3 is no longer at the second user premises 36. For instance, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 temporarily retains the portion of the media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 for a predefined amount of time (e.g., 1 hour) after the user 16-3 has left the second user premises 36. In this manner, media collection catalogs of other users 16 at user premises other than the user premises 30 are dynamically aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3.
In addition to uploading the local media collection catalog, the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 sends a base network ID for the user 16 to the CMAS 12 (step 1008). The base network ID preferably identifies a LAN that is a base network of the user 16 for purposes of media collection aggregation. The base network of the user 16 may be manually selected by the user 16 or automatically detected by the CMAS client 28. For example, the CMAS client 28 may automatically select a LAN to which the user device 14 is connected at the time of registration and/or uploading the local media collection catalog as the base network of the user 16. As another example, the CMAS client 28 may select a LAN to which the user device 14 is most often connected as the base network of the user 16. The base network ID may be any information that identifies the LAN selected as the base network. For example, the base network ID may be a network ID of the LAN. In response to receiving the base network ID, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 stores the base network ID of the user 16 in the user account of the user 16 (step 1010).
Sometime thereafter, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 identifies other users 16 that have the same base network as the user 16 (step 1012). For example, the aggregation function 20 may query or otherwise search the user accounts repository 22 using the base network ID of the base network of the user 16 to identify other users 16 that have the same base network as the user 16. Then, the aggregation function 20 aggregates the local media collection catalogs of the user devices 14 of the other users 16 having the same base network as the user 16 with the local media collection catalog of the user device 14 of the user 16 to provide an aggregate media collection catalog for the user 16 (step 1014). Also, in step 1014, if the user 16 has more than one user device 14 with associated local media collections 26, the CMAS 12 may also aggregate the local media collection catalogs of the other user devices 14 of the user 16 into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. As discussed below, the aggregate media collection catalog preferably includes a primary list of unique media items among the aggregated media collection catalogs and, for each unique media item, a sub-list that contains each instance of the unique media item in the aggregated media collection catalog.
The aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 is stored in the user account of the user 16 and sent to the user device 14 of the user 16 (steps 1016 and 1018). Notably, the aggregate media collection catalog sent to the user device 14 is preferably the same aggregate media collection catalog stored for the user 16 (e.g., includes both primary list and sub-lists). However, in an alternative embodiment, the aggregate media collection catalog sent to the user device 14 is a simplified version of the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 stored by the CMAS 12. For instance, the version of the aggregate media collection catalog sent to the user device 14 may include only the primary list of unique media items or a simplified version of the primary list that generally lists the unique media items and indicates whether each unique media item is stored locally or remotely.
Lastly, the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 utilizes the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 1020). For instance, the CMAS client 28 may present the aggregate media collection catalog to the user 16, enable the user 16 to browse the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to select a media item for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically select media items for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically generate playlists using the media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to purchase a media item listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that is not already owned by the user 16, and/or the like. Notably, the aggregate media collection catalog is preferably presented to and utilized by the user 16 as one single consolidated, or united, media collection rather than several separate media collections.
With respect to obtaining media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog for playback, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are stored locally in the local media collection 26 of the user device 14 are obtained and played from local storage of the user device 14. In contrast, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are not stored locally in the local media collection 26 of the user device 14 are obtained from a remote source. The remote source may be another user device 14 from whose media collection catalog the media item originates, the CMAS 12, or a third-party media delivery service. Further, if the remote source is a source other than the CMAS 12, the user device 14 may obtain the media item from the remote source either directly using information (e.g., a URI) included in the aggregate media collection catalog or via the CMAS 12.
Notably, using the process of
Next, the aggregation function 20 obtains, or gets, a first media item entry from the media collection catalog for aggregation (step 2004). As discussed above, the media item entry includes information identifying the corresponding media item such as, for example, the GUID, title, or similar information identifying the media item. In addition, the media item entry may include information regarding a quality of the media item, a bitrate used to encode the media item, and an availability of the media item. Still further, the media item entry may include information identifying a source of the media item, such as information identifying the user device 14 on which the media item is stored or information identifying the corresponding user 16.
Next, the aggregation function 20 determines whether the media item identified by the media item entry already exists in the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 2006). In this embodiment, the aggregate media collection catalog is formed by a primary list including a media item entry for each unique media item in the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. In addition, the aggregate media collection catalog may include a sub-list for each media item entry in the primary list including an entry for each occurrence of the corresponding media item in the local media collection catalog of the user 16 and the media collection catalogs identified for aggregation. For example, if a particular media item is included in the local media collections of two different users 16, the corresponding sub-list in the aggregate media collection catalog will include two entries for the media item where one entry corresponds to the media item in the local media collection 26 of one of the two users 16 and the other entry corresponds to the media item in the local media collection 26 of the other of the two users 16.
If the media item identified by the media item entry is already included in the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16, the process proceeds to step 2010. Otherwise, the aggregation function 20 creates a media item entry in the primary list of the aggregate media collection catalog for the media item identified by the media item entry (step 2008). At this point, whether proceeding from step 2006 or 2008, a media item entry is created in the appropriate sub-list for the particular copy of the media item corresponding to the media item entry in the media collection catalog currently being processed (step 2010).
In this embodiment, the media item in the media collection catalog currently being processed is scored in order to determine which media item entry from the sub-list for the media item is to be referenced or included in the primary list for the aggregate media collection catalog (step 2012). More specifically, in one embodiment, the media item identified by the media item entry in the sub-list is scored based on quality, bitrate, availability, and/or the like. Then, based on the scores of the media item entries in the sub-list for the media item, the sub-list is sorted (step 2014). The media item entry in the sorted sub-list having the highest score is then used as the media item entry for the corresponding media item in the primary list for the aggregate media collection catalog.
The aggregation function 20 then determines whether there are more media item entries in the media collection catalog being processed for aggregation (step 2016). If so, the aggregation function 20 obtains, or gets, the next media item entry from the media collection catalog (step 2018) and returns to step 2006. The process is repeated until the last media item entry in the media collection catalog is processed. Once the last media item entry is processed, the aggregation function 20 determines whether there are more media collection catalogs to aggregate (step 2020). If so, the aggregation function 20 obtains, or gets, the next media collection catalog for aggregation (step 2022) and returns to step 2004. The process is repeated until the last media collection catalog identified for aggregation is processed to provide the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. Once the last media collection catalog is processed for aggregation, the process ends (step 2024).
Next, the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 sends device IDs of the other user devices 14 detected in step 3000 and/or user IDs of the users 16 of the other user devices 14 detected in step 3000 to the CMAS 12 (step 3002). The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 then aggregates at least a portion of the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the geographically proximate users 16 (i.e., the users 16 of the geographically proximate user devices 14) with the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16, thereby dynamically updating the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 3004). The aggregation function 20 may control an extent to which the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the geographically proximate users 16 are aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 based on one or more predefined criteria. The one or more predefined criteria may include, for example, an amount of time that the geographically proximate users 16 have been or are expected to be in geographic proximity to the user 16, a location or type of location (e.g., a POI or a type of POI) at which the users 16 are located, a system-defined aggregation value, a user-configurable aggregation value, and/or the like, as discussed above. Notably, media item entries for media items aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 that closely match predefined user preferences of the user 16 or are otherwise known to be of interest to the user 16 but that have seldom or never been available to the user 16 may be highlighted in the aggregate media collection catalog.
The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 stores the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 resulting from step 3004 and sends the aggregate media collection catalog to the user device 14 (steps 3006 and 3008). The CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 then utilizes the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 3010). For instance, the CMAS client 28 may present the aggregate media collection catalog to the user 16, enable the user 16 to browse the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to select a media item for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically select media items for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically generate playlists using the media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to purchase a media item listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that is not already owned by the user 16, and/or the like. Notably, the aggregate media collection catalog is preferably presented to and utilized by the user 16 as one single consolidated, or united, media collection rather than several separate media collections.
With respect to obtaining media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog for playback, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are stored locally in the local media collection 26 of the user device 14 are obtained and played from local storage of the user device 14. In contrast, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are not stored locally in the local media collection 26 of the user device 14 are obtained from a remote source. The remote source may be another user device 14 from whose media collection catalog the media item originates, the CMAS 12, or a third-party media delivery service. Further, if the remote source is a source other than the CMAS 12, the user device 14 may obtain the media item from the remote source either directly using information (e.g., a URI) included in the aggregate media collection catalog or via the CMAS 12.
In this embodiment, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 updates the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 over time to include more of the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the geographically proximate users 16 (step 3012). For example, the media items listed in the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the geographically proximate users 16 may be scored based on predefined media preferences of the user 16. Initially, only the media item entries for media items scored above a threshold value may be aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. Over time, the threshold value is decreased such that more and more of the media item entries from the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the geographically proximate users 16 are aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. As the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 is updated, updates to, or an updated version of, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 is sent to the user device 14 for utilization by the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 as described above (step 3014).
Sometime thereafter, the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 detects that one or more of the other user devices 14 detected in step 3000 are no longer geographically proximate to the user device 14 (step 3016). In response, the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 notifies the CMAS 12 that those user devices 14, or alternatively the users 16 of those user devices 14, are no longer geographically proximate to the user device 14 (step 3018). The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 then de-aggregates the local and/or aggregate media collection catalog(s) of the users 16 that are no longer geographically proximate to the user 16 from the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 3020). More specifically, the media item entries in the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 that are from the media collection catalogs being de-aggregated are removed from the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16. Notably, in one embodiment, personalized metadata (e.g., ratings of the corresponding media items by the user 16, playcounts of corresponding media items by the user 16, metadata defined for the corresponding media items by the user 16, and/or the like) may be retained. With respect to personalized metadata, the interested reader is directed to commonly owned and assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0070537, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING A PERSONALIZED UNIVERSAL CATALOG OF MEDIA ITEMS, which published on Mar. 18, 2010, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference for its teachings on personalized metadata.
In one embodiment, the de-aggregation is performed immediately in response to receiving the notification in step 3018. However, in the preferred embodiment, the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the one or more other users 16 are retained in the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 at least temporarily after the one or more other users 16 are no longer geographically proximate to the user device 14. For example, de-aggregation may be performed after a system-defined amount of time (e.g., 1 hour) has expired after receiving the notification in step 3018. In this manner, the user 16 retains access, at least temporarily, to media items listed in the media collection catalogs of the one or more other users 16 even after the one or more other users 16 are no longer geographically proximate to the user 16. After de-aggregation, an update to, or an updated version of, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 is sent to the user device 14 of the user 16 for utilization by the CMAS client 28 as described above (step 3022). Using the process of
The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 stores the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 resulting from step 4002 and sends the aggregate media collection catalog to the user device 14 (steps 4004 and 4006). The CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 then utilizes the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 4008). For instance, the CMAS client 28 may present the aggregate media collection catalog to the user 16, enable the user 16 to browse the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to select a media item for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically select media items for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically generate playlists using the media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16 to purchase a media item listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that is not already owned by the user 16, and/or the like. Notably, the aggregate media collection catalog is preferably presented to and utilized by the user 16 as one single consolidated, or united, media collection rather than several separate media collections.
With respect to obtaining media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog for playback, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are stored locally in the local media collection 26 of the user device 14 are obtained and played from local storage of the user device 14. In contrast, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are not stored locally in the local media collection 26 of the user device 14 are obtained from a remote source. The remote source may be another user device 14 from whose media collection catalog the media item originates, the CMAS 12, or a third-party media delivery service. Further, if the remote source is a source other than the CMAS 12, the user device 14 may obtain the media item from the remote source either directly using information (e.g., a URI) included in the aggregate media collection catalog or via the CMAS 12.
In this embodiment, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 updates the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 over time to include more of the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the geographically proximate users 16 as discussed above (step 4010). As the aggregated media collection catalog of the user 16 is updated, updates to, or an updated version of, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 is sent to the user device 14 for utilization by the CMAS client 28 of the user device 14 as described above (step 4012).
Sometime thereafter, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 detects that one or more of the other users 16 detected in step 4000 are no longer geographically proximate to the user 16 of the user device 14 (step 4014). The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 then de-aggregates the local and/or aggregate media collection catalog(s) of the one or more other users 16 that are no longer geographically proximate to the user 16 from the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 4016). Again, in one embodiment, the de-aggregation is performed immediately in response to detecting the one or more users 16 that are no longer geographically proximate to the user 16. However, in the preferred embodiment, de-aggregation is delayed such that the user 16 retains access to media items listed in the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the one or more other users 16 at least temporarily after the one or more other users 16 are no longer geographically proximate to the user 16. After de-aggregation, an update to, or an updated version of, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 is sent to the user device 14 of the user 16 for utilization by the CMAS client 28 as described above (step 4018). Using the process of
The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 then aggregates at least a portion of the local media collection catalogs of the user devices 14-5 through 14-7 and/or the aggregate media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3, thereby dynamically updating the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 (step 5006). The aggregation function 20 may control an extent to which the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs are aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 based on criteria such as, for example, an amount of time that the user device 14-3 of the user 16-3 (and optionally the user devices 14-5 through 14-7 of the users 16-5 through 16-7) have been or are expected to be connected to the LAN 38, a location or type of location (e.g., a POI or a type of POI) of the second user premises 36 at which the LAN 38 is located, a system-defined aggregation value, a user-configurable aggregation value, and/or the like, as discussed above. Notably, media item entries for media items aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 that closely match predefined user preferences of the user 16-3 or are otherwise known to be of interest to the user 16-3 but that have seldom or never been available to the user 16-3 may be highlighted in the aggregate media collection catalog.
The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 stores the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 resulting from step 5006 and sends the aggregate media collection catalog to the user device 14-3 (steps 5008 and 5010). The CMAS client 28-3 of the user device 14-3 then utilizes the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 (step 5012). For instance, the CMAS client 28-3 may present the aggregate media collection catalog to the user 16-3, enable the user 16-3 to browse the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16-3 to create a playlist of media items from the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16-3 to select a media item for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically select media items for playback from the aggregate media collection catalog, automatically generate playlists using the media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog, enable the user 16-3 to purchase a media item listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that is not already owned by the user 16-3, and/or the like. Notably, the aggregate media collection catalog is preferably presented to and utilized by the user 16-3 as one single consolidated, or united, media collection rather than several separate media collections.
With respect to obtaining media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog for playback, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are stored locally in the local media collection 26-3 of the user device 14-3 are obtained and played from local storage of the user device 14-3. In contrast, media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalog that are not stored locally in the local media collection 26-3 of the user device 14-3 are obtained from a remote source. The remote source may be another user device 14 from whose media collection catalog the media item originates, the CMAS 12, or a third-party media delivery service. Further, if the remote source is a source other than the CMAS 12, the user device 14-3 may obtain the media item from the remote source either directly using information (e.g., a URI) included in the aggregate media collection catalog or via the CMAS 12.
In this embodiment, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 updates the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 over time to include more of the local media collection catalogs of the user devices 14-5 through 14-7 and/or the aggregate media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 of the user devices 14-5 through 14-7 (step 5014). For example, the media items listed in the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 may be scored based on predefined media preferences of the user 16-3. Initially, only the media item entries for media items scored above a threshold value may be aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. Over time, the threshold value is decreased such that more and more of the media item entries from the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 are aggregated into the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. As the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 is updated, updates to, or an updated version of, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 is sent to the user device 14-3 for utilization by the CMAS client 28-3 of the user device 14-3 as described above (step 5016).
Sometime thereafter, the user device 14-3 disconnects from the LAN 38 (step 5018), and the CMAS client 28-3 of the user device 14-3 notifies the CMAS 12 (5020). The aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 then de-aggregates the local and/or aggregate media collection catalog(s) of the users 16-5 through 16-7 from the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 (step 5022). More specifically, the media item entries in the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 that are from the media collection catalogs being de-aggregated are removed from the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3. Notably, in one embodiment, personalized metadata (e.g., ratings of the corresponding media items by the user 16-3, playcounts of corresponding media items by the user 16-3, metadata defined for the corresponding media items by the user 16-3, and/or the like) may be retained, as discussed above.
In one embodiment, the de-aggregation is performed immediately in response to receiving the notification in step 5020. However, in the preferred embodiment, de-aggregation is delayed such that the user 16-3 retains access to the local and/or aggregate media collection catalogs of the users 16-5 through 16-7 at least temporarily after the user device 14-3 has disconnected from the LAN 38. Notably, when disconnected from the LAN 38, the user device 14-3 may be enabled to connect to the network 18 via, for example, a wireless cellular communications interface (e.g., a 3G or 4G wireless cellular communications interface). For example, de-aggregation may be performed after a system-defined amount of time (e.g., 1 hour) has expired after receiving the notification in step 5020. After de-aggregation, an update to, or an updated version of, the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16-3 is sent to the user device 14-3 of the user 16-3 for utilization by the CMAS client 28-3 as described above (step 5024). Using the process of
More specifically, a historical record of previous geographic locations of the users 16 may be maintained by the CMAS 12 or may otherwise be accessible to the CMAS 12. The historical record may define the previous geographic locations of the users 16 as well as dates and/or times at which the users 16 were at those previous geographic locations. Based on the historical record, the aggregation function 20 is enabled to predict future geographic locations of the users 16 and then determine when two or more of the users 16 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another in the future. Similarly, a historical record of previous LAN connections of the user devices 14 of the users 16 may be maintained by the CMAS 12 or may otherwise be accessible to the CMAS 12. This historical record may define LANs to which the user devices 14 of the users 16 have previously been connected as well as dates and/or times at which the user devices 14 were connected to those LANs. Using this information, the aggregation function 20 is enabled to predict future LAN connections of the user devices 14 of the users 16 and then determine when the user devices 14 of two or more of the users 16 are expected to be connected to the same LAN in the future.
In addition or alternatively, the aggregation function 20 may have access to route information for traveling routes currently being traveled by or planned to be traveled by the users 16. The route information may be obtained from, for example, separate navigation systems of the users 16 (e.g., personal navigation devices or in-vehicle navigation devices) or navigation components or features of the user devices 14. Using the route information, the aggregation function 20 is enabled to determine when two or more of the users 16 are expected to be in geographic proximity to one another.
In addition or alternatively, the aggregation function 20 may have access to calendar information from electronic calendars of the users 16 that defines events (e.g., meetings) scheduled for the users 16, dates and times for which the events are scheduled, and, in some embodiments, other users 16 to participate in the events and/or geographic locations at which the events are scheduled to occur. Using this calendar information, the aggregation function 20 can determine when two or more of the users 16 are scheduled to be in geographic proximity to one another in the future.
Next, the aggregation function 20 of the CMAS 12 predictively aggregates at least a portion of the local media collection catalogs of the user devices 14 of the one or more other users 16 or the aggregate media collection catalogs of the one or more other users 16 with the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 to provide a predictive aggregate media collection catalog for the user 16 (step 6002). Thereafter, the aggregation function 20 determines that the user 16 and the one or more other users 16 are geographically proximate to one another or that the user devices 14 of the user 16 and the one or more other users 16 are connected to the same LAN (step 6004). In response, the aggregation function 20 stores the predictive aggregate media collection catalog as the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 (step 6006) and sends the aggregate media collection catalog of the user 16 to the user device 14 of the user 16 (step 6008).
It should be noted that the systems and methods described herein have substantial opportunity for variation without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. For example, while the discussion above primarily focuses on the aggregation of local media collection catalogs of the users 16, the present disclosure is not limited thereto. In one alternative embodiment, some or all of the users 16 may have user media collections stored by a cloud-based media collection storage and possibly playback service. One such service is Amazon's Cloud Music player, which enables users to store their music collections in the cloud and then play their music from any user device having web access. If the media collections owned by the users 16 are stored by such a cloud-based service, the CMAS 12 may additionally or alternatively operate to aggregate corresponding media collection catalogs of the users 16 for the user media collections stored by the cloud-based service using the processes described herein. Further, the CMAS 12 may be integrated with a cloud-based media storage and playback service or may be separate from the cloud-based media storage and playback service. The media items listed in the aggregate media collection catalogs of the users 16 may then be accessible from the cloud-based service.
As another example, while dynamic media aggregation has been described herein with respect to
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/387,728, filed Sep. 29, 2010, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5001554 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5490284 | Itoh et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5544313 | Shachnai et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5818935 | Maa | Oct 1998 | A |
5835727 | Wong et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6160877 | Tatchell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6202056 | Nuttall | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6321224 | Beall et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349329 | Mackintosh et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6466980 | Lumelsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484165 | Beall et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6618593 | Drutman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633903 | Gould | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6681108 | Terry et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6714215 | Flora et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728760 | Fairchild et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748376 | Beall et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6820063 | England et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6886035 | Wolff | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6907458 | Tomassetti et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920281 | Agnibotri et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6953886 | Looney et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954790 | Forslow | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6987221 | Platt | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993532 | Platt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7024424 | Platt et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7103645 | Leighton et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113999 | Pestoni et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117266 | Fishman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136945 | Gibbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149977 | Zaner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7197490 | English | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197557 | Asar et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7206568 | Sudit | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7260198 | Scott et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269249 | Woodring | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280646 | Urban et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296031 | Platt et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7302253 | Moody et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310676 | Bourne | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313571 | Platt et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313814 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7333092 | Zadesky et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7363361 | Tewari et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373144 | Kirkpatrick et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7373644 | Aborn | May 2008 | B2 |
7409556 | Wu et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412325 | Tannenbaum et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7426537 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444413 | Saxena | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7483958 | Elabbady et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7546641 | Robert et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548934 | Platt et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7567721 | Alattar et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7636509 | Davis | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668939 | Encarnacion et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680814 | Mercer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680959 | Svendsen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684815 | Counts et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685210 | Plastina et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689510 | Lamkin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696427 | West et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702728 | Zaner et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7730216 | Issa et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7730527 | Charles et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747620 | Beaupre | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752265 | Svendsen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769894 | Matz | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779097 | Lamkin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792756 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840620 | Vignoli et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853712 | Amidon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7917557 | Shteyn et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8059646 | Svendsen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8224899 | Svendsen et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8285810 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285811 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8583671 | Martin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20010012303 | Gruse et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020029384 | Griggs | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020051540 | Glick et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069278 | Forslow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072326 | Qureshey et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030023578 | Durand et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032419 | Shibasaki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037157 | Pestoni et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030088677 | Yamamoto | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110510 | Gong et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130953 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135608 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167295 | Choo | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191946 | Auer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195808 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212804 | Hashemi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217163 | Lagerweij et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227478 | Chatfield | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040042599 | Zaner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040193902 | Vogler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050038876 | Chaudhuri | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050027 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060350 | Baum et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097595 | Lipsanen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131894 | Vuong | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149480 | Deshpande | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149508 | Deshpande | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154608 | Paulson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163300 | Kawakami et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177614 | Bourne | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185795 | Song et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198031 | Pezaris et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212767 | Marvit et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221841 | Piccionelli et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234735 | Williams | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240494 | Cue et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243979 | Starbuck et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251565 | Weel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251576 | Weel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256870 | Benco et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262246 | Menon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272413 | Bourne | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273848 | Charles et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004631 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029040 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042483 | Work et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060044466 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059096 | Dublish et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069998 | Artman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085419 | Rosen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087926 | Hwang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060143236 | Wu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156347 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159109 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161871 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167956 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179078 | McLean | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195515 | Beaupre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195902 | King et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212478 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218225 | Hee Voon et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218613 | Bushnell | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229058 | Rosenberg | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240856 | Counts et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242106 | Bank | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245367 | Jeffery et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265349 | Hicken | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265467 | Jang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287813 | Quigley | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025194 | Morse et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031109 | Tsuboi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033225 | Davis | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038647 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047519 | Bangor et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048713 | Plastina et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048714 | Plastina et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061416 | Gould | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083556 | Plastina et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070113081 | Camp | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121843 | Atazky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126859 | Choi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127423 | Ho | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130153 | Nachman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168544 | Sciammarella | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168554 | Dinger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180496 | Fransdonk | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192276 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196802 | Beletski et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201502 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206736 | Sprigg et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218980 | Pachnis et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220081 | Hyman | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234213 | Krikorian et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239778 | Gallagher | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244856 | Plastina et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244880 | Martin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255807 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266001 | Williams et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276826 | Chand et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281689 | Altman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282621 | Altman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282949 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297426 | Haveson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299681 | Plastina et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002022 | VanEpps | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005072 | Meek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005125 | Gaedeke | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005179 | Friedman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008252 | Xu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016205 | Svendsen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022003 | Alve | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033809 | Black et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040475 | Bosworth et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045189 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046976 | Zuckerberg | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051071 | Vishwanathan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052349 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052371 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059992 | Amidon et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066176 | Hamid | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080392 | Walsh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086261 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086431 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088698 | Patel et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091717 | Garbow et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092201 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095450 | Kirenko | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101604 | Kocher et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103907 | Maislos et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104122 | Hempleman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109888 | Ullah | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117295 | Ebrahimi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132175 | Loeb et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133441 | West et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133759 | Weel | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147711 | Spiegelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147798 | Paalasmaa et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148363 | Gilder et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154780 | Soukup et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154798 | Valz | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154967 | Heikes et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155057 | Khedouri et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080176511 | Tan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184317 | Khedouri et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186962 | Sinha | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189617 | Covell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205205 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208823 | Hicken | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209577 | Vrielink et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222188 | Watson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256032 | Vignoli et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259154 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281507 | Bergman | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080318560 | Reifman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005040 | Bourne | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012706 | Kim | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019156 | Mo et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037005 | Larsen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041311 | Hundley | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044278 | Lim | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055922 | Kotzin | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060467 | Grigsby et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063975 | Bull et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070334 | Callahan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070438 | Bartholomew | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077129 | Blose | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080635 | Altberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083117 | Svendsen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092237 | Chang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094317 | Venkitaraman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094330 | McQuaide, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094531 | Danieli et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138505 | Purdy | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157304 | Zhe et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164199 | Amidon et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164452 | Yogaratnam et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164600 | Issa et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165356 | Blum | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177654 | Beaupre et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180621 | Kratz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193338 | Fiatal | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196302 | Pastorino et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216859 | Dolling | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217352 | Shen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222392 | Martin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228774 | Matheny et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234909 | Strandell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249222 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254643 | Terheggen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256870 | Nakamura | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259539 | Dawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265218 | Amini et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265356 | Hyman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265417 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265418 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265426 | Svendsen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090307361 | Issa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326970 | Estrada et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328087 | Higgins et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015975 | Issa et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015976 | Issa et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023578 | Brant et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037752 | Hansson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049827 | Turner | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100066599 | Liu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070490 | Amidon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070537 | Amidon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071070 | Jawa et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082135 | Amidon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082488 | Evans et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094833 | Svendsen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094834 | Svendsen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094934 | Svendsen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094935 | Svendsen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107117 | Pearce et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114979 | Petersen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115553 | Van Flandern et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125410 | Hicks | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134647 | Orboubadian | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146091 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146135 | Evans et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169279 | Loi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186034 | Walker | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100197318 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100197319 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198818 | McLaughlin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198826 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198828 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198862 | Jennings et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198870 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198917 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227594 | De Vries | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232431 | Sebastian | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110004840 | Feinberg et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060994 | Maxwell et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066646 | Danado et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110145327 | Stewart | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208831 | Ho et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214124 | Ferris et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246572 | Kollenkark et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258560 | Mercuri et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264495 | Hailey et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110295727 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023430 | Amidon et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036494 | Gurumohan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120095962 | Goldman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113964 | Petersen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117110 | Amidon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117832 | Mueller | May 2012 | A1 |
20120259737 | Pousti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101115019 | Jan 2008 | CN |
1221816 | Jul 2002 | EP |
WO 2007069004 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007137626 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007140321 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009149437 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010030392 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010093275 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“3GPP,” Wikipedia, at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP>, as revised Mar. 27, 2008, printed Dec. 12, 2011, 1 page. |
“4G,” Wikipedia, at <htpp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki4G>, as revised Apr. 23, 2008, printed Dec. 12, 2011, 1 page. |
Abstract, Tanaka, K. et al., “A destination prediction method using driving contexts and trajectory for car navigation systems,” Proc. of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'09), Mar. 9-12, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 190-195, ACM, New York, New York, 2009, 3 pages. |
“A Music Revolution . . . SoundServer,” imerge, date unknown but obtained on or prior to Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages. |
Peer, Nir J., “AlwaySocial: Social Networking in the Real World,” at <http://www.cs.umd.edu/Grad/scholarlypapers/papers/NirPeer.pdf>, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 2008, 6 pages. |
Kevin C. Almeroth et al., “An Alternative Paradigm for Scalable On-Demand Applications: Evaluating and Deploying the Interactive Multimedia Jukebox,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 11, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1999, pp. 658-672, copyright 1999 IEEE, 15 pages. |
Dou, Yufeng et al., “An Approach to Analyzing Correlation between Songs/Artists Using iTMS Playlists,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce vol. 1 (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06), vol. 1, pp. 951-956, 2005, 6 pages. |
“Apple—iTunes—What is iTunes?—A player, a store, and more,” at <http://www.apple.com/itunes/whatis/>, printed Aug. 11, 2009, 2 pages. |
“BlueCastWiFi,” <http://www.bluecasting.com/prodserv.html>. |
“Celtius XDM Server,” copyright 2007, Celtius Ltd., originally found at <http://www.celtius.com/s.asp?p=494>, found at Internet Archive, dated Oct. 9, 2007, printed Apr. 28, 2011, 2 pages.r. |
Feng-Cheng Chang et al., “Combined Encryption and Watermarking Approaches for Scalable Multimedia Coding,” PCM 2004, LNCS 3333, 2004, Springer-Verlang Berlin Heidelberg 2004, 8 pages. |
Shin, S., Combined Scheme of Encryption and Watermarking in H.264/Scalable Video Coding (SVC), in New Directions in Intelligent Interactive Multimedia, vol. 142 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 351-361, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Sep. 9, 2008, 3 pages. |
“Content-Based Access Control,” author unknown but likely Hart, M., Johnson, R., and Stent, A. in 2006, found on webpage of Michael Hart, PhD candidate at Stony Brook University of Stony Brook, NY, at <http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/%7Emhart/cbac.pdf>, found Apr. 13, 2009, 11 pages. |
Kasenna, “Deploying Network-Based PVR Services,” Sep. 2004, copyright 2004, Kasenna, Inc., found at <http://www.kasenna.com/downloads/white—papers/Kasenna—NPVR—TimelessTV—White—Paper.pdf>, pp. 1-12. |
Kincaid, Jason, “Dial Plus Fetches Information as You Talk,” Apr. 18, 2008, at <http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/dial-plus-fetches-information-as-you-talk/>, printed Nov. 17, 2011, 2 pages. |
“DialPlus—P2P,” at <http://www.dialplus.net/productp2p.html>, copyright 2008, Dialplus, Inc., printed Apr. 24, 2008, 1 page. |
“Digital rights management,” at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital—rights—management>, includes information dating back to 1998, page last modified Apr. 16, 2011, printed Apr. 21, 2011, 21 pages. |
Raivio, Yrjo et al., “Digital Rights Management in the Mobile Environment,” ICE-B International Conference on E-Business, Aug. 7-10, 2006, Setubal, Portugal, pp. 182-185. |
“DNS Service Discovery (DNS-SD),” at <http://www.dns-sd.org/>, printed May 18, 2010, 4 pages. |
“Exclusive: Windows Mobile 7 to Focus on Touch and Motion Gestures,” posted by Nathan Weinberg, Windows Mobile, Jan. 6, 2008, InsideMicrosoft—part of the Blog News Channel, originally found at <http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/archives/2008/01/06/exclusive-windows-mobile-7-to-focus-on-touc h-and-motion-gestures/>, obtained from Internet Archive, printed Apr. 8, 2011, 34 pages. |
Muster, Richard T., Captain, USAF, “Exploitation of Geographic Information Systems for Vehicular Destination Prediction,” Masters Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Graduate School of Engineering and Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Mar. 2009, found at <http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA499514>, 205 pages. |
“Firefly Media Server :: Home Page,” at <http://www.fireflymediaserver.org/>, printed Feb. 3, 2009, 1 page. |
“FLUTE—File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport,” Oct. 2004, copyright 2004, The Internet Society, at <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3926>, printed Apr. 19, 2011, 36 pages. |
Quercia, D. and Capra, L., “FriendSensing: Recommending Friends Using Mobile Phones,” In Proceedings of RecSys '09, Oct. 23-25, 2009, New York, New York, found at <http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/16835/1/16835.pdf>, 8 pages. |
Pering, T. et al. “Gesture Connect: Facilitating Tangible Interaction With a Flick of the Wrist,” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI) 2007, Feb. 15-17, 2007 Baton Rouge, Louisiana, ACM, New York, New York, originally found at <http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/yanokwa/papers/anokwa—gestureconnect.pdf>, obtained from the Internet Archive, 4 pages. |
“How to Share Files in Windows XP,” at <http://compnetworking.about.com/od/windo...>, from Internet Archive dated Mar. 31, 2006, printed Feb. 26, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Infrared Data Association Releases IrDA Global Market Report 2007,” Infrared Data Association, 2007, at <http://www.irda.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=17>, printed Apr. 8, 2011, 1 page. |
“IPv6,” Wikipedia, at http://en.wikiPedie.org/wiki/IPv6>, includes information that dates back to the early 1980s, page last modified Apr. 18, 2011, printed Apr. 21, 2011, 16 pages. |
Meola, R., “IR Communication: Beyond Cell Phones and PDAs,” Nov. 13, 2006, Dr. Dobb's, at <http://drdobbs.com/mobility/194300336>, printed Apr. 8, 2011, 3 pages. |
“Libox—About us,” at http://www.libox.com/about/>, from the Internet Archive, dated Oct. 26, 2009, copyright 2009, Libox, printed Apr. 19, 2012, 1 page. |
“LimeWire User Manual,” copyright 2000-2005, limewire, 24 pages. |
“LinkedIn: Relationships Matter,” at <http://www.linkedin.com/>, date unknown but website dates back to at least 2003, copyright 2009, LinkedIn Corportaion, printed Jan. 22, 2009, 1 page. |
Chen, Brian X., “LinkedIn iPhone App Gets Revamped UI,” Dec. 30, 2009, found at <http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/linkedin-iphone-app- gets-revamped-ui/>, printed Nov. 1, 2011, 2 pages. |
Shanahan, Kevin P. and Freedman, Michael J., “Locality Prediction for Oblivious Clients,” In Proc. of the International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), Feb. 24-25, 2005, Ithaca, New York, found at <http://cs.brown.edu/courses/cs296-2/papers/netmap.pdf>, 6 pages. |
Ripeanu et al., “Mapping the Gnutella Network: Properties of Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems and Implications for System Design,” IEEE Internet Computing Journal, 6(1), 2002, 12 pages. |
“Microsoft Windows XP tutorial free. Unit 4 Windows Explorer,” at <http://www.teacherclick.com/winxp/t—4—1.htm>, copyright Nov. 2005, aulaClic, printed Feb. 26, 2012, 4 pages. |
Pietilainen, A-K et al., “MobiClique: Middleware for Mobile Social Networking,” In Proceedings of WOSN '09, Aug. 17, 2009, Barcelona, Spain, found at <http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2009/workshops/wosn/papers/p49.pdf>, 6 pages. |
“Multicast,” Wikipedia, at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast>, includes information that dates back to 2005, page last modified Mar. 26, 2011, printed Apr. 21, 2011, 5 pages. |
Wu et al., “Next Generation Mobile Multimedia Communications: Media Codec and Media Transport Perspectives,” China Communications, Oct. 2006, 15 pages. |
“Our Company | mSpot,” at <http://www.mspotcorporate.com/>, from the Internet Archive, dated May 14, 2010, copyright 2010, mSpot, Incorporated, printed Apr. 19, 2012, 3 pages. |
Wiegand, T. et al., “Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003, IEEE, pp. 560-576, 17 pages. |
Tallberg, Mathias, “P2P-Based Roaming Between Home WLAN Hotspots,” from <http://whitepaper.techworld.com/wireless-networking-wlan-wi-fi/4587/p2p-based-roaming-between-home-wlan-hotspots/>, Mar. 1, 2007, 6 pages. |
Ratiu, Florin, “People You May Know—Facebook,” at http://ja-jp.facebook.com/blog.php?post=15610312130>, posted May 1, 2008, printed Oct. 3, 2011, 4 pages. |
Krumm, J. and Horvitz, E., “Predestination: Inferring Destinations from Partial Trajectories,” UbiComp 2006, Sep. 17-21, 2006, Orange County, California, 18 pages. |
Hsiang-Chew Huang et al., “Progressive Watermarking Techniques Using Genetic Algorithms,” Circuits Systems Signal Processing, vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 671-687, Oct. 24, 2007. |
“RTP, Real-time Transport Protocol,” at <http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/rtp.htm>, copyright 1998-2011, Network Sorcery, Inc., printed Apr. 19, 2011, 13 pages. |
Zahariadis, Theodore et al., “Scalable Content Delivery Over P2P Convergent Networks,” 12th IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, (ISCE 2008), Vilamoura, Portugal, Apr. 14-16, 2008, 4 pages. |
Dapeng Wu et al., “Scalable Video Coding and Transport over Broad-Band Wireless Networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 6-20, Jan. 2001. |
“Skype official website—free download and free calls and internet calls,” at <http://www.skype.com/>, date unknown but website dates back to at least 2003, copyright 2009, Skype Limited, printed Jan. 22, 2009, 1 page. |
Meerwald, P. and Uhl, A., “Toward robust watermarking of scalable video,” In Proceedings of SPIE, Security, Forensics, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents X, San Jose, California, Jan. 27-31, 2008, vol. 6819, published Mar. 18, 2008, SPIE, 12 pages. |
Abstract, Alvarez-Garcia, J.A. at al., “Trip destination prediction based on past GPS log using a Hidden Markov Model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, Issue 12, Dec. 2010, Elsevier Ltd, pp. 8166-8171, available online Jun. 2, 2010, 3 pages. |
Oliver, Mark, “Tutorial; The H.264 Scalable Video Codec (SVC),” EE Times, Mar. 10, 2008, at <http://www.eetimes.com/design/signal-processing-dsp/4017613/Tutorial-The-H-264-Scalable-Video-Codec-SVC->, printed May 25, 2011, 7 pages. |
Hua, K.A. et al., “Video Delivery Technologies for Large-Scale Deployment of Multimedia Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 1439-1451, 13 pages. |
“Welcome to Facebook!—Facebook,” at http://www.facebook.com/, copyright 2008, Facebook, printed Jan. 9, 2008, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120117146 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61387728 | Sep 2010 | US |