The present invention relates generally to computer systems and more particularly to the manufacturing of computer systems.
Traditional computer manufacturing processes such as those illustrated in
Software services exist that are written to the particular standards, such as the Intel PXE standard. These services provide a way for a known MAC address to be bound to an image based on tables that are set up in advance of the boot event. Alternatively, the service can be configured such that all machines of a given architecture get the same boot image. However, this does not provide a way to specify what image a particular SUT gets when the MAC address is unknown until runtime. In addition, there is no mechanism for selecting an image from a set of images based on where an SUT is within the process.
In addition, there are many “server dense” architectures such as the BladeCenter system manufactured by IBM Corporation. In such an architecture a single SUT includes up to 14 separate processing units therein. Typically, each of the processing units requires different operating system configurations. There is no simple solution to specify images for each of the different processing units.
Competitors, particularly those that do small volumes, may choose to handle manufacturing requirements manually using highly-trained operators. However, the lack of automation would reduce quality due to human error. A high-volume manufacturer will find a manual process unacceptable.
Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for overcoming the above-identified problem. The present invention addresses such a need.
A computer manufacturing system is disclosed. The computer manufacturing system comprises a system under test (SUT), the SUT including a network adapter and a boot loader for loading the appropriate operating system. The SUT further includes a station for receiving customer orders for the SUT, the station including a sequencer. The sequencer obtains a boot selection file for the SUT from a directory. The SUT further retrieves and parses the boot selection file to obtain the operating system image to load and boot until the SUT is configured with the appropriate data.
A system and method in accordance with the present invention provides a means for a computer being manufactured (hereinafter called a system under test, or SUT) to boot an operating system without the need for any local media. In addition, it allows the SUT to boot any one of several operating systems as required, depending on the tools being run during that portion of the process. The system in accordance with the present invention allows the operating system to be specified as an attribute of a manufacturing operation. The system in accordance with the present invention can switch between operating systems as required by the operations to be performed as specified by the appropriate personnel.
The present invention relates generally to computer systems and more particularly to the manufacturing of computer systems. The following description is presented to enable one or ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
In a method and system in accordance with the present invention, prior to a manufacturing run, all necessary boot images are created and put on the manufacturing server. During run-time, a system and method in accordance with the present invention identifies the system under test (SUT) architecture, assigns an IP address, and loads the operating system through the SUT's network adapter. The manufacturing server is responsible for IP address assignment as well as providing the boot selection file to the SUT. A significant amount of the system capability in accordance with the present invention, resides in the pre-boot code. This pre-boot code runs on the SUT and is responsible for.
1. Ensuring that the networking software is loaded
2. Identifying the particular SUT
3. Changing the configured SUT identification into an entry in the SUT-specific directory.
4. Requesting the boot selection file based upon the SUT-specific identification
5. Boot-strapping the specified operating system based on the contents of the boot selection file
The operating system boot image required for each portion of the manufacturing process is specified as part of the product process definition. This definition is stored in the SUT-specific directory on the manufacturing server. Just prior to engaging the system in accordance with the present invention, the boot selection file on the server is updated, again in the SUT-specific directory. The SUT is then re-booted. The pre-boot code on the SUT will then retrieve and parse the boot selection file to obtain the operating system image to load and boot. This can be repeated as necessary throughout the process of configuring the SUT with the appropriate information.
To describe the features of the present invention in more detail, refer now to the following description along with the accompanying figures.
The station 200 performs the in-process binding. The station 200 also launches the sequencer 202 based on the process definition file in the MTSN directory for a given SUT. Commands are executed on the station 200 for controlling the power cycler or for providing service processor communication. The station 200 is preferably LINUX-based and includes a sequencer 202 that allows for identifying of each SUT. Referring back to
Next, the sequencer 202 runs a command to modify the boot selection file for the SUT, via step 404. Then the sequencer 202 provides a re-boot command to restart the SUT 300, via step 406. Thereafter, the pre-boot code of the boot loader 304 in the SUT 300 is activated.
The boot loader 204 detects that the communication software (i.e. internet protocol stack) the SUT 300, is loaded, via step 408. Then the SUT 300 captures a MAC address from the network adapter 302, via step 410. Next, the boot loader 304 uses the MAC address to look up the MTSN in the sequencer 202, via step 412. Then, the boot loader 304 issues a command to retrieve the boot selection file based upon the MTSN, via step 414. The boot loader 304 then boot-straps the operating system specified in the boot selection file from the network, via step 416. Finally, the sequencer 202 issues the first command to run under a specified operating system, via step 418.
Accordingly, a system and method in accordance with the present invention allows for multiple operating systems to be provided to an SUT as an attribute of the manufacturing process. Accordingly, a particular operating system can be provided on SUT for one part of the manufacturing while another operating system can be provided on the SUT for another part of the manufacturing process.
The system and method in accordance with the present invention addresses the manufacturing requirements of the emerging Itanium-based products, as well as the emerging “server-dense” solutions. There is currently no industry manufacturing solution for these products.
1. No broad Requirement for Local Media.
2. Support for multiple operating systems
3. Support for Multiple Architectures
In addition to dynamic operating system selection, the system in accordance with the present invention also provides architecture flexibility.
Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4868875 | Goatman | Sep 1989 | A |
5136705 | Stubbs et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5901289 | Leonard et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948101 | David et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6285967 | Rajan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327706 | Amberg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349341 | Likes | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351769 | King et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370641 | Maia | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6473857 | Panas et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477486 | Ram et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499115 | Wiedeman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6557128 | Turnquist | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560706 | Carbajal et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6615406 | Amberg et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651093 | Wiedeman et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654347 | Wiedeman et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6718373 | Bearden et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721762 | Levine et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6807665 | Evans et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826710 | Merkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6859925 | Lin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6910064 | Astarabadi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6973564 | Merkin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000231 | Gold | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7039682 | Baitinger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047403 | Lin | May 2006 | B2 |
7062645 | Kroening | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085921 | Frye, Jr. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093124 | Girard | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20020162059 | McNeely et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188514 | Kritt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028629 | Amro et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046529 | Loison et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030208712 | Louden et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040199758 | Meaney et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050055688 | Barajas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066015 | Dandekar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050198629 | Vishwanath | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050108512 A1 | May 2005 | US |