(1) Technical Field
This invention relates to electronic circuits, and more particularly to low dropout voltage regulator circuits.
(2) Background
A well-known type of voltage regulator circuit is a low-dropout (LDO) regulator, which is a DC linear voltage regulator which can operate with a very small input-output differential voltage and maintain a (substantially) constant output voltage Vout with respect to a varying input voltage Vin. Advantages of an LDO voltage regulator generally include a low minimum operating voltage and high efficiency operation.
In operation, one input of the error amplifier 102 monitors the fraction of Vout determined by the resistor ratio of R1 and R2. The second input to the differential amplifier is a reference voltage Vref from a stable voltage source (e.g., a bandgap reference). If the output voltage Vout varies too much relative to the reference voltage Vref, the drive to the gate of the FET 104 changes to maintain a constant output voltage regardless of voltage excursions at Vin (within the circuit specifications). Filter capacitors Cin and Cout may be provided at the input and the output of the LDO circuit 100, as is known in the art.
One aspect of the LDO circuit 100 shown in
Accordingly, there is thus a need for a low dropout voltage regulator circuit having lower power dissipation than conventional LDO regulator circuits. The present invention addresses this need.
The invention encompasses an adaptive low dropout voltage regulator circuit having low power dissipation, and a method of regulating voltage while maintaining low power dissipation.
In considering the usage of LDO regulators in practical circuits, it was realized that the output voltage Vout need not be constant, but only need be maintained between the circuit specification parameters Vout_min to Vout_max. Accordingly, power dissipation in an LDO circuit can be controlled and held to a low value in comparison to prior art LDO circuits by designing an LDO circuit that maintains a constant voltage difference between Vin and Vout; that is, ΔV=Vin−Vout is held approximately constant rather than being linearly variable as a function of Vin. Thus, the output voltage Vout essentially tracks the input voltage Vin with an offset equal to ΔV; Vout increases as Vin, but is kept between the Vout_min to Vout_max circuit specification limits. An LDO regulator circuit designed with this concept in mind may be thought of as adapting Vout to Vin within a constrained output voltage range that need not be constant.
In one embodiment, an input voltage Vin is coupled to a pass transistor, which typically is a FET or JFET or a device with comparable characteristics. The resistance of the pass transistor, and thus the amount of input voltage Vin passed across the pass transistor as an output voltage Vout, is determined by a control signal applied to a control gate of the pass transistor. The control gate of the pass transistor is coupled to an error amplifier, the inputs of which are coupled to an adaptive control. The adaptive control is coupled to Vin, Vout, and a reference voltage Vref from a stable voltage source.
The purpose of the adaptive control is to compute or generate ΔV, which is the difference between Vin and Vout, and compare ΔV to Vref. If ΔV (as opposed to Vout) varies too much relative to Vref, the drive to the control gate of the pass transistor changes to maintain an essentially constant ΔV regardless of voltage excursions at Vin, within circuit specifications. A variant of the LDO circuit allows ΔV to vary at high values of Vin to maintain Vout within circuit specifications.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The invention encompasses an adaptive low dropout voltage regulator circuit having low power dissipation, and a method of regulating voltage while maintaining low power dissipation.
In considering the usage of LDO regulators in practical circuits, it was realized that the output voltage Vout need not be constant (i.e., the output DC voltage does not need to be fixed), but only need be maintained between the circuit specification parameters Vout_min to Vout_max. Accordingly, power dissipation in an LDO circuit can be controlled and held to a low value in comparison to prior art LDO circuits by designing an LDO circuit that maintains a constant voltage difference between Vin and Vout; that is, ΔV=Vin−Vout is held approximately constant rather than being linearly variable as a function of Vin. Thus, the output voltage Vout essentially tracks the input voltage Vin with an offset equal to ΔV; Vout increases as Vin, but is kept between the Vout_min to Vout_max circuit specification limits. An LDO regulator circuit designed with this concept in mind may be thought of as adapting Vout to Vin within a constrained output voltage range that need not be constant.
The control gate of the pass transistor 302 is coupled to an error amplifier 304, the inputs of which are coupled to an adaptive control 306. The adaptive control is 306 coupled to Vin, Vout, and a reference voltage Vref from a stable voltage source (e.g., a bandgap reference). As in the prior art, filter capacitors (not shown) may be provided at the input and/or the output of the LDO circuit 300. All adaptive LDO circuit 300 components preferably are low power, and preferably much lower cumulatively than the power saved by the disclosed circuit.
The purpose of the adaptive control 306 is to compute or generate ΔV, which is the difference between Vin and Vout, and compare ΔV to Vref (Vref is the target value for ΔV). If the ΔV (as opposed to Vout) varies too much relative to Vref, the drive to the control gate of the pass transistor 302 changes to maintain an essentially constant ΔV regardless of voltage excursions at Vin, within circuit specifications (however, as noted in further detail below, a variant of the LDO circuit 300 allows ΔV to vary at high values of Vin to maintain Vout within circuit specifications).
As should be apparent from
In terms of control loop theory, the loop bandwidth of the adaptive LDO circuit 300 is set by the circuit parameters. In the preferred embodiment, the input is tracked inside the loop bandwidth (including DC), and energy outside the loop bandwidth is rejected. Thus, the LDO circuit 300 tracks input voltage within the loop bandwidth (preferred is narrow bandwidth tracking primarily DC) while regulating and rejecting input noise/ripple voltages at frequencies above the loop bandwidth (i.e., the circuit behaves like a low pass filter). Note that this is in contrast to prior art LDO circuits, which behave like high pass filters. If rejection of low frequency energy is desired (e.g., ripple rejection), an averaging circuit or a low pass filter such as an RC filter may be inserted in the input sensing line. This will prevent the loop from tracking the input inside the bandwidth of the RC filter, thus rejecting the energy in that bandwidth. The output will still track the input with a ΔV offset, but will track only (moving) average changes, not rapid (near instantaneous) changes.
In either of the circuits of
In either of the embodiments shown in
Using a digital adaptive control provides additional flexibility to the circuit, such as by allowing taking into account a measured temperature of the LDO circuit 300 and/or the ambient temperature, and letting the power dissipation increase if the excess heat can be tolerated in view of such measurements.
Referring again to
As an example of the advantages of the invention over the prior art for particular embodiments, consider a circuit specification requiring the following values: Vin_min=5.1V, Vin_max=5.6V; Vout_min=4.8V, Vout_max=5.3V. Assuming a 0.2V dropout LDO pass transistor and 100 mA load current, then the following results are typical:
Prior art circuit:
For an embodiment of the adaptive LDO in accordance with the present invention:
Thus, an embodiment of the present invention can achieve more than a factor of two improvement in power dissipation at Vin_max, saving 40 mW in the above example (70 mW for the prior art circuit versus 30 mW for the example embodiment of the present invention). Of note, the savings scales up with current: for example, with a 1 A load, the saving is 400 mW, which is particularly significant for integrated circuit embodiments of the invention. Quite importantly, the prior art circuit will consume more power for any excursion of Vin above Vin_min, while the adaptive LDO of the present invention stays at minimum power dissipation for most values of Vin, rising only as Vin approaches fairly closely to Vin_max (if the circuit is designed to allow ΔV to vary at higher input voltages, as described above).
The invention also encompasses several methods of regulating voltage while maintaining low power dissipation. In one embodiment, the method includes:
In another embodiment, the method of regulating voltage includes:
In still another embodiment, the method of regulating voltage includes:
These methods may further include filtering the voltage input before determining ΔV in order to track only moving average changes to the voltage input, as noted with respect to the circuit description above.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. It is to be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, some of the steps described above may be order independent, and thus can be performed in an order different from that described. It is to be understood that the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the following claims, and that other embodiments are within the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/947,521, filed on Jul. 22, 2013. The above stated application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5680035 | Haim | Oct 1997 | A |
6531851 | Lenk | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6661214 | Hann | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20010030530 | Marty | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20060273771 | van Ettinger | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20100156364 | Cho | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120013396 | Morino | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160085252 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13947521 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 14947612 | US |