Method and system for automated technical support for computers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6560726
  • Patent Number
    6,560,726
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 19, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 6, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method and system for integrated support for solving problems with personal computer systems comprises monitoring operating system functionality to determine if a computer system failure exists, to identify the computer system failure and to provide a solution of the computer system failure. A robust user interface, including a simple-to-use user button interface, supports single touch user input to indicate a computer system problem or question. Watchdog timers compare the time of hardware and operating system functionality, such as boot sequence operation, against predetermined time periods to determine whether or not a computer failure exists. A computer system failure is determined if a watchdog timer expires upon completion of a predetermined time period without being cleared. A hardware problem is identified on initial boot if the watchdog timer is not cleared by an operating system service routine. An operating system hang-up is determined if a watchdog timer is not cleared by an application run in association with the operating system. If a computer failure is detected, a service mode is initiated with a service mode operating system to allow in-depth analysis and problem resolution. Service mode operation is also monitored to detect problems.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This patent application relates in general to the field of computing devices, and more particularly to a method and system for automating support for computers.




BACKGROUND




Personal computer systems have become increasingly common in businesses and households. Although the term “personal computer” implies a generic device, personal computers generally have a wide diversity of hardware and software components. For instance, different personal computers may have processors and buses of different speeds, hard drive and RAM memories of different sizes, and peripheral devices interfaced with different types of interface cards, such as audio devices. Further, a large array of manufacturers produce computer components so that in a given personal computer even components having substantially similar operating characteristics may have important differences based on each component's manufacturer specification.




With respect to software, generally all personal computers have a common need for an operating system that coordinates the operation of hardware components. However, each individual personal computer may have one of many possible operating systems. For instance, Microsoft products have evolved from its original Disk Operating System (“DOS”) to Windows systems, including Windows 3.1, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows CE and Windows NT. In addition to these Microsoft operating systems other types of operating systems are available, such as different versions of Unix, including Linux.




In addition to this wide diversity of operating systems, personal computers may operate a large number of different types of software applications. A given software application may interact in different manners with different operating systems. Thus, even with substantially similar hardware components, personal computers having different software may operate in substantially different manners.




Computer users can experience difficulties in system operation for many reasons. Lack of knowledge, hardware faults, software incompatibilities, and many other causes can lead to problems for the computer user. Given the wide range of hardware and software available (which implies an even greater range of hardware/software combinations that a user can experience), it is difficult to determine if the computer has a problem.




This situation is further complicated by the fact that personal computers do not have good mechanisms to automatically determine if the hardware/software system is having a problem. While certain operating systems contain code that help sense some types of problems with specific pieces of hardware, such mechanisms may be insufficiently uniform for determining if the operating system has a problem. Indeed, a common symptom of an operating system problem is a failure to boot, in which case the OS cannot be counted on to help. Another common symptom of an operating system problem is a hang, in which case the operating system becomes unresponsive to the keyboard and mouse for a wide variety of possible causes. It should be noted that this type of problem can be caused by pieces of software which have been installed on top of the operating system, such as an application or driver, or some incompatibility between pieces of software that have been loaded. A system that was operational may stop functioning at some later point due to software incompatibilities.




Another issue is the lack of a uniform mechanism for the user to invoke assistance. If the user has a question or the system has a problem, or at least the user perceives a problem, there is currently no uniform mechanism to get the system to attempt to provide assistance to the user. Although there are various types of help available to the user, they rely on one or more working input devices, such as a mouse and/or a keyboard, and a sufficient level of user knowledge to be able to navigate to one of a variety of information sources on the system and on a global information source such as the internet.




SUMMARY




Therefore, a need has arisen for a method and system for identifying and resolving personal computer system problems which is accessible through a uniform mechanism regardless of the functional state of the operating system and other software.




A further need exists for a method and system which detects when an operating system has failed to boot and can take appropriate corrective actions.




A further need exists for a method and system which can detect when an operating system hangs and can then take appropriate actions.




A further need exists for a standard mechanism which can be invoked to attempt to resolve operating system failure to boot and operating system hang conditions.




In accordance with the present disclosure, a method and system is provided that substantially eliminates or reduces disadvantages and problems associated with previously developed methods and systems for resolving computer system problems. A monitoring system detects problems with a computer system and aides in identifying and resolving the problems. The current level of functionality of the computer system is determined, and technical support is provided for the computer system in accordance with the functionality of the computer system.




More specifically, a state machine monitors operating system functionality to detect computer system failures. A watchdog timer is initiated substantially simultaneous with computer system boot and cleared at a predetermined point of the computer system boot sequence. A computer system failure is determined to exist if the watchdog timer remains uncleared after a predetermined time period. For instance, the watchdog timer is cleared with an operating system service routine before expiration of the predetermined time period, thus indicating that the operating system has booted through the service routine point of the boot sequence within the predetermined time period. Failure to clear the watchdog timer with the service routine indicates failure of the boot process through the boot sequence point at which the service routine is called.




In one embodiment, a user initiates operating system monitoring by pressing a service button to indicate a problem with the computer system. The pressing of the service button initiates support functions, such as the initiation of a service application; this allows testing of the computer system by the monitoring system. Alternatively or in addition to the initiating of the watchdog timer associated with monitoring the boot through calling of the operating system, the service button initiates another watchdog timer that acts as a hang detection timer. If the service button is pressed during computer system boot, the hang detection timer is initiated at a predetermined point of the computer system boot sequence, such as after a user provides log in information, and is cleared upon initiation of the service application. An operating system hang-up error is identified if the hang detection timer remains uncleared after a predetermined hang detection time.




In one embodiment, detection of a computer failure results in a reboot of the computer system to a service mode. The service mode boots up a service mode operating system to enable analysis of the computer system even if the computer system's primary operating system has failed. Initiation of a service mode boot also starts a watchdog timer. The watchdog timer is cleared at a predetermined point of the service mode operating system boot sequence. A computer system failure is determined to exist if the watchdog timer remains uncleared after a predetermined time period. If the service mode boot was initiated by a previous user press of the service button and ensuing fault detection, then a service mode hang detection timer monitors the service mode operating system boot sequence to detect any hang-up of the service mode operating system.




The present invention provides many important technical advantages. One important technical advantage is integrated support for detecting problems associated with computer systems. Monitoring a computer system boot sequence for hardware or operating system failure enables automation of problem detection and support for resolving the problems. Further, detection of an operating system failure allows analysis and correction of the computer system problem through use of the service mode operating system.




Another important technical advantage is the automatic confirmation that a problem exists with a computer system. Indication that the monitoring system has detected a problem provides, as a minimum, confirmation to technical support staff with reduced dependence on the verbal description of the computer system user. Problem confirmation limits the number of basic items that technical support staff need to check over the course of a telephone call. Further, if the monitoring system does not detect a problem, then technical support staff can limit the number of problems needing investigation. For instance, failure to detect a problem with the monitoring system indicates that the hardware and operating system have booted in a normal manner, and the system is capable of initiating the service application.




Another important technical advantage is the identification of the problem associated with the computer system. For instance, monitoring of the computer system boot allows identification of problems as associated with hardware or with the operating system, or alternatively may indicate proper hardware and operating system functionality that indicates user or application related difficulties. If operating system software is the problem, use of a service mode operating system supports full analysis to further identify and analyze the problem. For instance, if the main operating system is inoperable, then the service mode operating system supports computer system operation and allows operation of the computer system for automatic analysis and correction of the problem with the main operating system.




Another important technical advantage is a robust user interface that is simple and uncomplicated to use. For instance, a user with a question or problem simply pushes a single service button. Pressing the service button generates an interrupt directly into the chip set to, for instance, initiate a service application with hang detection monitoring. The direct interface of the service button to the chip set enhances reliability and simplicity. For instance, the user's input to the service button does not have to rely on the operation of computer components, such as a keyboard or mouse. Further, once the service button is pressed, the computer system may perform an indepth analysis of potential problems, even when the operating system has failed, by using the service mode operating system to run computer components.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A more complete understanding of the present invention and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:





FIG. 1

depicts a block diagram of a computer system monitored by an operating system monitor state machine;





FIG. 2

depicts a flow diagram of operating system monitoring during and after a normal mode boot; and





FIG. 3

depicts a flow diagram of operating system monitoring during and after a service mode boot.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Preferred embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the FIGURES, like numeral being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.




A healthy operating system monitors hardware and software operations on a computer system. At times, the operating system detects difficulties or problems with the computer system and provides notice of the difficulties or problems to the computer system user. Help systems generally associated with the operating system can help to resolve difficulties or problems either automatically or through user interaction, such as asking questions. However, when the operating system itself has a problem or there are software incompatibilities, it is difficult for the operating system to address those problems. Frequently, the operating system either shuts down or hangs up without providing further notice of the problem to the computer system user.




To improve computer system problem detection, identification and resolution, a monitoring system associated with the computer system's BIOS monitors operating system functionality. The monitoring system detects operating system boot failures and various types of operating system hang-ups. Once a problem is detected, remedial action is automatically taken to recover a failed computer system using a uniform mechanism that takes advantage of operational aspects of the computer system. For instance, a single push of a service button provides an interrupt to the computer system chip set for automatically invoking the highest available level of user assistance as determined by computer system health and state. The service button may be pressed by a user while the computer system is in POST, booting, in service mode or in normal mode. When the service button is pressed, the BIOS sets a bit in a CMOS register and generates an interrupt. State-sensitive interrupt handler code in BIOS takes appropriate action based upon the state of computer system as represented by certain CMOS bits.




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, a block diagram depicts a computer system


10


having an operating system


12


interfaced with hardware components


14


through a basic input output system (“BIOS”)


16


. Hardware components


14


include conventional personal computer system hardware components such as a processor, modem, audio card, video card, and storage devices, including a hard drive, floppy drives, ROM and RAM. On initial power-up or upon initiation of a re-boot, BIOS


16


directs a boot sequence, including a power on self test (“POST”) and calling of the operating system. Within hardware


14


resides one or more timers


18


and


19


, such as a conventional watchdog timers.




BIOS


16


boots computer system


10


on power up in a conventional manner. A monitor state machine


20


monitors the boot process by comparing state transitions through the boot sequence against expected results. Monitor state machine


20


, for instance, communicates with timer


18


to compare the expected time for a predetermined transition from a first point of the boot sequence to a second point against elapsed time for the sequence. If timer


18


expires uncleared, then a problem has been detected based upon the timer's expiration. If BIOS


16


successfully boots computer system


10


to bring operating system


12


on line, then a service routine of operating system


12


clears timer


18


to prevent an indication of a problem.




If monitor state machine


20


detects a problem with computer system


10


, BIOS


16


may direct a number of different responses. For instance, BIOS


16


may call up a service mode operating system with service protocol


22


. The service mode operating system may, for instance, be a simplified version of operating system


12


, such as the Windows' Safe mode for Windows 98. The service mode operating system may include a modem driver so that the computer system can contact an analysis server through the Internet to upload user symptoms, system configuration and state information, as well as to run automated analysis software and diagnosis. BIOS


16


also may illuminate service lights


24


to indicate detection of a problem, with a different configuration of lights indicating the identity of one or more specific problems. A computer user may then provide the illuminated light information to technical support to help analyze and solve the problem. Alternatively, technical support may obtain system information from the analysis server.




Computer system


10


includes a service button


26


available for a computer user to press. Service button


26


provides a robust user interface that enables a user to initiate the problem detection and identification process. Service button


26


generates an interrupt into the computer system chip set to, for instance, initiate a service application. Monitor state machine


20


detects pressing of the service button and launches the service application or monitors the system behavior to detect computer system problems.




In addition to monitoring the boot sequence through the calling of operating system


12


, monitor state machine


20


may monitor the functioning of operating system


12


with a hang detection timer


19


. If the service button has been pressed during boot, hang detection timer


19


is initiated during the boot sequence, for instance, by a user login, and cleared by an application run after completion of the calling up and booting of operating system


12


or service mode operating system


22


. If the application does not clear hang detection timer


19


within a predetermined period of time, monitoring state machine


20


determines that an operating system hang-up has occurred. BIOS


16


then recognizes an operating system problem and attempts a service mode boot or indicates a probable hardware failure through service lights


24


.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a flow diagram depicts steps for support automation for operating system monitoring of a normal boot mode. At step


50


, a normal computer boot is initiated. For instance, the user of computer system


10


may apply power or may have instructed the operating system to reboot the system. At step


52


a hang detection watchdog timer is initiated. The booting of the operating system and the activity of the timer proceed in parallel within the system. The watchdog timer counts down. If it reaches zero before steps


58


and


60


are completed (i.e., when a service routine runs late in the boot process and clears the timer), then step


54


is achieved, and the system is rebooted into service mode in step


56


.




Typically, the boot sequence tests hardware and initiates operating system boot within a predictable time period. Upon completion of the hardware testing, such as the POST test, and initiation of the operating system boot, an instruction is sent from an operating system service routine to clear the watchdog timer at step


58


. If the watchdog timer is cleared at step


60


, a normal boot is indicated. If the watchdog timer is not cleared and counts down to zero, the process proceeds to step


56


for rebooting into service mode with the service mode operating system. In one embodiment, additional normal boots may be automatically repeated before proceeding to the service mode boot sequence. In summary, if the watchdog timer remains uncleared after a predetermined period of time then it is known that the computer system did not boot through the point of the boot sequence at which the service routine clears the watchdog timer. Thus, the problem with the computer system may be identified to a certain degree based upon the boot sequence that was or was not completed.




Step


58


indicates that an operating system service routine is run at a predefined point in the latter part of the computer boot process. At step


60


, the watchdog timer is cleared with the operating system service routine before expiration of the watchdog timer predetermined time period. If step


60


is reached, then the computer hardware and software tested and run up to initiation of the predefined point of the operating system boot sequence should generally be operational. Once this determination is made, at step


62


a user is provided an opportunity to login.




At step


64


, a determination is made of whether the service button


26


was pressed during the OS boot process, as opposed to a normal boot in which the service button was not pressed. If the determination is no, the process proceeds to step


70


for initiation of normal computer system operation.




If at step


64


it is determined that pressing of the service button occurred during boot, then at step


66


, a service application is initiated and at step


72


a hang detection timer is initiated for monitoring of an operating system hang-up. Hang detection monitoring uses hang detection timer


19


or another timer to test whether the operating system completes its service application launch within a predetermined period of time. The hang detection timer is initiated at step


72


and then cleared by an application running on the computer system after the application completes a predetermined portion of its loading and startup sequence at step


68


. Thus, at step


68


a determination is made of whether the application loading and startup sequence is normal. If yes, the application running on the computer system clears the hang detection timer and the process proceeds to step


70


for initiation of support applications. If the hang detection timer remains uncleared for a predetermined period of time, then at step


74


a determination is made that the service application has failed to clear timer


19


. This may indicate that the operating system has hung; at a minimum, it is incapable of starting the service application normally. At step


74


, upon detection of expiration of the hang detection timer, the system is rebooted into normal mode (step


50


) or service mode (step


76


), dependent upon a definable number of unsuccessful attempts to reboot into normal mode (step


75


).




If a user presses the service button while the computer is in normal operation, such as at step


70


of

FIG. 2

, or at anytime other than boot of the computer, then the system proceeds to step


78


to test the operating system for a hang-up. A service application is initiated at


66


and the hang detection timer is initiated at step


72


. If the service application clears the timer at step


68


, then the computer system proceeds to normal operation at step


70


. If the timer expires at step


74


, then an operating system hang-up is detected and the system attempts to reboot to normal mode (at step


75


) until a specifiable number of normal reboot failures have occurred, at which point the system reboots to service mode at step


76


. This allows a determination of operating system functionality without a need for a complete reboot. Further, if the timer expires at step


74


, trouble shooting is possible with the service mode even though the normal operating system is not functional.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, service mode is initiated at step


80


with a service mode boot sequence. At step


82


, a service mode watchdog timer is initiated. As above, this watchdog timer counts down toward zero in parallel with the loading of the (in this case, service mode) operating system. If the watchdog timer reaches zero (step


84


) before it is cleared late in the service mode boot process (steps


88


and


90


), then the service mode boot has failed and this is indicated by setting the LEDs to indicate hardware failure (step


86


). A hardware problem is probable since neither the main operating system nor the service mode operating system were able to bring the computer to an operational state.




At step


88


, a service mode operating system routine is run at a predefined point in the later part of the boot process. If the service routine runs at step


88


, then at step


90


the routine clears the timer to indicate that the service mode operating system is functional. At step


92


, computer system boot is completed with the service mode operating system.




At step


94


, a determination is made of whether the service button was pressed during the normal mode or service mode boot. The state of button pressed during boot is stored across reboot attempts that fail. If yes, then the service application is launched and a system hang detection test proceeds with initiation of the operating system hang detection timer at step


104


. Again, the counting down of the hang detection timer occurs in parallel with the loading and startup of the service mode recovery application at step


96


. If this succeeds, it will run code to clear the hang detection time at step


98


. At this point, the service mode operating system is known to be at least functional enough to start the service mode application. At step


100


, service support applications are initiated such as those useful for analyzing software problems. The computer system is operating in service mode and is available for troubleshooting.




At step


106


, if the watchdog timer counts down to zero (i.e., expires) prior to being cleared by the service application, then at step


108


the service mode operating system has been shown to be incapable of loading and starting the service application within the preset time period. At this point, a hang of the service mode operating system has been detected, and the process ends with indication of a probable hardware problem on lights associated with the computer system at step


108


.




At step


102


, if the service button was pressed while the computer is in service mode operation, then the system proceeds to steps


104


and


96


in parallel to test the service mode operating system for a hang-up. A service application is initiated at step


96


and the hang detection timer is initiated at step


104


If the service application clears the timer at step


98


, then the computer system proceeds to service mode operation at step


100


to allow initiation of service mode recovery applications that allow analysis of the computer system failure and corrective action. If the timer expires at step


106


, then an operating system hang-up is detected and the system indicates a probable hardware failure at step


108


. This allows a determination of service mode operating system functionality without a need for a complete reboot.




The following case examples will further clarify the operation of the monitoring system. If the monitoring system finds no hardware or operating system faults, then the computer user may seek a resolution of the problem or question through local help on the computer system or by connecting with help over the internet using the computer system. Local and remote internet-based help will resolve the majority of computer problems or questions.




Another helpful case example is a non-fatal hardware failure, such as a CD-ROM or audio speaker card failure. The monitoring system should indicate that no failure has occurred with the operating system, and the user may contact technical support to have new hardware sent. Some types of non-fatal hardware failures will limit the options available for obtaining help. For instance, the computer system will operate without a modem or network interface card (“NIC”). However, failure of this hardware will limit the computer system's ability to interact over the Internet to obtain help. In part, modem failure may be addressed by entering the service mode. For instance, if modem failure is associated with modem configuration or ISP dial instructions, then a service mode modem configuration may support an Internet-based problem solution.




In another case example, if the normal mode operating system is not operational, will not boot or is otherwise unstable, a modem connection may be established with the service mode operating system. The Internet connection through the service mode allows direct system analysis of the operating system to automatically support operating system problem resolution and operating system restoration. For instance, a new operating system or relevant parts of the operating system may be loaded over the Internet to replace the faulty operating system. If the automatic problem resolution fails to resolve the problem, then the user may call technical support and identify the problem based on the displayed light configuration.




As one additional case example, the computer system may have a fatal flaw that prevents operation in both the normal and the service modes. For instance, the computer system may be set up incorrectly or may have a fatal hardware fault, such as a motherboard, hard drive or power supply fault. In such instances, an explanatory chart provided with the computer system will provide the problem associated with display light configurations, and simple instructions for the user to follow. The user may then use this information to contact technical support and obtain replacement hardware.




The problem identification and resolution system described herein may be provided as a build-to-order component of the computer system. For instance, less sophisticated users may order their computer system with single-button push problem resolution, whereas more experienced users may order computer systems with standard configurations. Alternatively, computer system buyer's may order only portions of the system, such as a timer associated with just main operating system monitoring that does not include the ability to automatically call up a service mode operating system.




Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for monitoring a computer system boot, the method comprising:initiating a computer system boot, including initiating a BIOS and a first operating system; initiating a timer; clearing the timer if a predetermined point of the computer system boot sequence occurs; determining that a computer system failure exists if the timer remains uncleared after a predetermined time period using a monitoring state machine associated with the BIOS; initiating a service mode operating system operable to identify the computer system failure; said determining step further comprises identifying one or more computer system problems associated with the predetermined point of the computer system boot sequence; and said predetermined point of the boot sequence comprises initiation of the first operating system boot, the computer system problem comprising a hardware fault.
  • 2. A method for testing for failure of a computer system, comprising:initiating a computer system boot with a BIOS and a first operating system; initiating a timer; clearing the timer with an application run by the first operating system; determining a computer system failure has occurred if the timer remains uncleared after a predetermined time period; initiating a re-boot using a service mode operating system if a computer system failure is determined, the service mode operating system operable to identify the computer system failure; initiating a second timer; clearing the second timer with an application run by the computer system upon substantial completion of the re-boot with the service mode operating system; and determining a service mode operating system failure if the timer remains uncleared after a predetermined time period.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the computer system failure comprises a failure of the first operating system and wherein the timer is cleared by a service application associated with the first operating system.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the service mode operating system comprises Windows Safe mode.
  • 5. A computer system comprising:a processor having at least one timer; a BIOS for booting the computer system; a first operating system for supporting computer system operations; a monitoring state machine associated with the BIOS and in communication with the processor, the monitoring state machine operable to detect operating system failure by comparing elapsed time for an operating system function associated with the first operating system against a predetermined time period, the elapsed time measured with the timer; and the monitoring state machine operable to initiate a service mode operating system, the service mode operating system operable to identify the detected operating system failure.
  • 6. The system of claim 5 wherein the operating system function comprises calling an application upon substantial completion of a computer system boot.
  • 7. The system of claim 5 wherein the monitoring state machine initiates timing with the timer upon user login to the computer system.
  • 8. The system of claim 5 wherein the operating system function comprises calling a service routine during computer system boot.
  • 9. The system of claim 8 wherein the monitoring state machine initiates timing with the timer upon the application of power to the computer system.
  • 10. The system of claim 5 further comprising service lights in communication with the BIOS, the service lights for indicating identification of problems detected on the computer system.
  • 11. The system of claim 5 further comprising a service button for interrupting the processor and initiating the timer.
US Referenced Citations (163)
Number Name Date Kind
4253178 Kolaczia Feb 1981 A
4356545 West Oct 1982 A
4438458 Munscher Mar 1984 A
4491914 Sujaku Jan 1985 A
4627060 Huang et al. Dec 1986 A
4635187 Baron et al. Jan 1987 A
4788658 Hanebuth Nov 1988 A
4809280 Shonaka Feb 1989 A
4916699 Ohashi Apr 1990 A
4964077 Eisen et al. Oct 1990 A
5010551 Goldsmith et al. Apr 1991 A
5017030 Crews May 1991 A
5060135 Levine et al. Oct 1991 A
5196993 Herron et al. Mar 1993 A
5214695 Arnold et al. May 1993 A
5224024 Tu et al. Jun 1993 A
5228655 Garcia et al. Jul 1993 A
5276805 Hamaguchi Jan 1994 A
5287448 Nicol et al. Feb 1994 A
5287505 Calvert et al. Feb 1994 A
5325521 Koyama et al. Jun 1994 A
5346410 Moore, Jr. Sep 1994 A
5348408 Gelardi et al. Sep 1994 A
5353240 Mallory et al. Oct 1994 A
5355357 Yamamori et al. Oct 1994 A
5356099 Sereboff Oct 1994 A
5367667 Wahlquist et al. Nov 1994 A
5374018 Daneshvar Dec 1994 A
5375800 Wilcox et al. Dec 1994 A
5381526 Ellson Jan 1995 A
5388032 Gill et al. Feb 1995 A
5390324 Burckhartt et al. Feb 1995 A
5392095 Siegel Feb 1995 A
5398333 Schieve et al. Mar 1995 A
5410447 Miyagawa et al. Apr 1995 A
5422751 Lewis et al. Jun 1995 A
5423605 Liu Jun 1995 A
5432927 Grote et al. Jul 1995 A
5443237 Stadtmauer Aug 1995 A
5450576 Kennedy Sep 1995 A
5454080 Fasig et al. Sep 1995 A
5455933 Schieve et al. Oct 1995 A
5471674 Stewart et al. Nov 1995 A
5483437 Tang Jan 1996 A
5503484 Louis Apr 1996 A
5513319 Finch et al. Apr 1996 A
5522572 Copeland et al. Jun 1996 A
5526180 Rausnitz Jun 1996 A
5530847 Schieve et al. Jun 1996 A
5537585 Blickenstaff et al. Jul 1996 A
5537618 Boulton et al. Jul 1996 A
5547154 Kirchoff et al. Aug 1996 A
5547272 Paterson et al. Aug 1996 A
5564054 Bramnick et al. Oct 1996 A
5592362 Ohgami et al. Jan 1997 A
5596481 Liu et al. Jan 1997 A
5596482 Horikoshi Jan 1997 A
5627964 Reynolds et al. May 1997 A
5649200 Leblang Jul 1997 A
5668992 Hammer et al. Sep 1997 A
5678002 Fawcett et al. Oct 1997 A
5680640 Ofek et al. Oct 1997 A
5689253 Hargreaves et al. Nov 1997 A
5689706 Rao et al. Nov 1997 A
5694293 Seto et al. Dec 1997 A
5708776 Kikinis Jan 1998 A
5708812 Van Dyke et al. Jan 1998 A
5724224 Howell et al. Mar 1998 A
5727163 Bezos Mar 1998 A
5732268 Bizzarri Mar 1998 A
5748877 Dollahite et al. May 1998 A
5759644 Stanley Jun 1998 A
5768370 Maatta et al. Jun 1998 A
5775822 Cheng Jul 1998 A
5778372 Cordell et al. Jul 1998 A
5790796 Sadowsky Aug 1998 A
5796579 Nakajima et al. Aug 1998 A
5797281 Fox Aug 1998 A
5803416 Hanson et al. Sep 1998 A
5805882 Cooper et al. Sep 1998 A
5809248 Vidovic Sep 1998 A
5809511 Peake Sep 1998 A
5818635 Hohn et al. Oct 1998 A
5819274 Jackson, Jr. Oct 1998 A
5825355 Palmer et al. Oct 1998 A
5825506 Bednar et al. Oct 1998 A
5826839 Chen Oct 1998 A
5832522 Blickenstaff et al. Nov 1998 A
5835344 Alexander Nov 1998 A
5845136 Babcock Dec 1998 A
5852545 Pan-Ratzlaff Dec 1998 A
5854828 Kocis et al. Dec 1998 A
5860001 Cromer et al. Jan 1999 A
5860002 Huang Jan 1999 A
5860012 Luu Jan 1999 A
5861884 Fujioka Jan 1999 A
5881236 Dickey Mar 1999 A
5884073 Dent Mar 1999 A
5894571 O'Connor Apr 1999 A
5904327 Cheng May 1999 A
5905632 Seto et al. May 1999 A
5906506 Chang et al. May 1999 A
5909544 Anderson, II et al. Jun 1999 A
5939694 Holcomb et al. Aug 1999 A
5953533 Fink et al. Sep 1999 A
5955797 Kim Sep 1999 A
5960189 Stupek, Jr. et al. Sep 1999 A
5960204 Yinger et al. Sep 1999 A
5960411 Hartman et al. Sep 1999 A
5963743 Amberg et al. Oct 1999 A
5974546 Anderson Oct 1999 A
5978911 Knox et al. Nov 1999 A
5983369 Bakoglu et al. Nov 1999 A
5991543 Amberg et al. Nov 1999 A
5995757 Amberg et al. Nov 1999 A
6006344 Bell, Jr. Dec 1999 A
6012154 Poisner Jan 2000 A
6014744 McKaughan et al. Jan 2000 A
6023267 Chapuis et al. Feb 2000 A
6029257 Palmer Feb 2000 A
6029258 Ahmad Feb 2000 A
6032157 Tamano et al. Feb 2000 A
6034869 Lin Mar 2000 A
6038597 Van Wyngarden Mar 2000 A
6047261 Siefert Apr 2000 A
6048454 Howell et al. Apr 2000 A
6049342 Nielsen et al. Apr 2000 A
6050833 Danzyger et al. Apr 2000 A
6056136 Taber et al. May 2000 A
6061788 Reynaud et al. May 2000 A
6061810 Potter May 2000 A
6065136 Kuwabara May 2000 A
6104874 Branson et al. Aug 2000 A
6108697 Raymond et al. Aug 2000 A
6112320 Dien Aug 2000 A
6113050 Rush Sep 2000 A
6166729 Acosta et al. Dec 2000 A
6167383 Henson Dec 2000 A
6167532 Wisecup Dec 2000 A
6170065 Kobata et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182212 Atkins et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182275 Beelitz et al. Jan 2001 B1
6199204 Donohue Mar 2001 B1
6202207 Donohue Mar 2001 B1
6226412 Schwab May 2001 B1
6236901 Goss May 2001 B1
6247126 Beelitz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256620 Jawahar et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263215 Patton et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272484 Martin et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279109 Brundridge Aug 2001 B1
6279125 Klein Aug 2001 B1
6279156 Amberg et al. Aug 2001 B1
6298443 Colligan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6298457 Rachlin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6331936 Hom et al. Dec 2001 B1
6356977 Ofek et al. Mar 2002 B2
6367035 White Apr 2002 B1
6385737 Benignus et al. May 2002 B1
6393586 Sloan et al. May 2002 B1
6449735 Edwards et al. Sep 2002 B1
6487464 Martinez et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505298 Cerbini et al. Jan 2003 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
2065939 Jul 1981 GB
2329266 Mar 1999 GB
2356271 May 2001 GB
WO 9300628 Jan 1993 WO
WO 9408289 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9709676 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9818086 Apr 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
Wilson et al. “Knowledge based interface to manufacturing computer system”, ACM pp 1183-1189, 1988.
Green, “Component based software development: implications for documentation”, ACM pp 159-164, 1999.
Hall et al., “A cooperative approach to support software deployment using software dock”, ACM ICSE pp 174-183, 1999.
Great Britain Search and Examination Report 0019866.3, Mar. 12, 2001.
Pending Patent Application Ser. No. 09/236,862: Alan E. Beelitz, Richard D. Amberg; “Recoverable Software Installation Process and Apparatus for a Computer System”; Dell USA, L.P., filed Jan. 25, 1999.
“HP builds in Net button,” at Internet <http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-202-316545.html>, printed Oct. 18, 1999.
Exploring Windows NT “ZD Journals” at Internet >http://www.zdjournals.com/9802.ewn9821.html<, printed Oct. 18, 1999.
“Packard Bell PCs provide state-of-the-art technology and complete user support” at <http://www.gadgetguru.com.html>, printed Oct. 18, 1999.
PCWorld News “Compaq Debuts Home PCs” at Internet >http://www2.pcworld.com.html<, printed Oct. 18, 1999.
Compaq Computer Corporation, Press Release, “New PCs Offer Equipment, Colour and Personality; Compaq's Presario Range Opened Up for Customisation” at Internet >http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/000719/compaq_new.html<, printed Jul. 24, 2000.
Compaq Computer Corporation, “Home and Home Office Computing, My Style” at internet >wysiwyg://3/http://athome.compaq.com/showroom/static/splash.asp<, printed Jul. 18, 2000.
Epson, “Epson Stylus Color 74i It makes a Colorful Case for Being Your iMac Printer” at Internet >http://www.epson.com/printer/inkjet/sty740i.html<, printed Jul. 24, 2000.
Radio Shack, advertisement, p. 2, Aug. 20, 2000.
CNET.com, “IBM to Get Colorful with New Notebooks” at Internet >http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-296049.html?tag=st.con.1fd2<, printed Oct. 6, 1999.
3Com, “Palm Computer, News and Promotions” at Internet >http://www.palm.com/pr/holidaydebut.html<, printed Oct. 5, 1999.
@Backup Company, “@Backup Company Information Page” at Internet, http://security.atbackup.com/VID101.3.819255.0/Company.htm, Printed Jun. 15, 1999.
@Backup Company, “@Backup Company Frequently Asked Questions” at Internet, http://security.atbackup.com/VID101.3.819255.0/FAQ.asp, Printed Jun. 15, 1999.
@Backup Company, “Frequently Asked Questions: Technical” at Internet, http://security.atbackup.com/VID101.3.819255.0/Tech.asp, Printed Jun. 15, 1999.
@Backup Company, “Are You Protected” at Internet, http://security.atbackup.com/VID101.3.819255.0/Main.asp, Printed Jun. 15, 1999.
Pending Patent Application: Jeffrey N. Sloan, Tim Sullivan, David S. Springer, “Method and Apparatus for Diagnosing and Conveying an Identification Code in Post on a Non-Booting Personal Computer”; Dell USA, L.P.