Patent Grant
7725079
The present invention relates to the field of communications, and more specifically to improving signal fidelity in a communication system by compensating for interference that occurs between two or more communication channels.
Radios used in wireless communications systems generally receive small signals and transmit large signals. There are many sources of noise in a modern wireless communication system. They include the transmitter and possibly multiple transmitters for devices with multiple radios operating simultaneously. Insufficient isolation between transmitter and receiver, crosstalk from unwanted sources, broadband noise from digital buses such as those traveling from a processor to a display device, and side lobes of these and other signals can all contribute to the interfering noise in the system. Representative types of interference may be generally characterized as electromagnetic interference (EMI) or insufficient isolation. In EMI, the interference is a radiated electromagnetic wave that is coupled into the receiver. When components have insufficient isolation, interfering signals or noise may couple through electrical components, air, or printed circuit board (PCB) traces.
Since wireless communication systems transmit and receive electromagnetic (EM) signals to communicate data, EMI can be a significant concern. Examples of such systems include mobile phones, wireless e-mail services, pager services, wireless data networks (e.g. networks conforming to IEEE standards 802.11a/b/g/n), satellite links, terrestrial microwave, wireless peripheral links (e.g. Bluetooth) cable television, broadcast television, and global position systems (GPSs). Receivers within wireless communication devices may undesirably receive interfering signals along with the intended radio signal. The radio signal that was intended to be received can be termed the “victim” signal. The signal that imposes the interference can be termed the “aggressor” or “aggressing” signal. Thus, EMI often degrades the signal fidelity of the victim signal and impairs radio reception quality. Exemplary sources of interference can include, among others, other radio circuits within the device itself, high-speed buses carrying data within the device itself, signals coupling from other circuits within the device due to poor isolation, and EMI originating outside the device. Even when the communication bands of the victim and aggressor do not directly overlap one another, out-of-band aggressor signals may corrupt the victim signal, particularly if the aggressor signal is significantly more intense than the victim signal.
EMI may become problematic when two or more radio services are operated on the same device, such as a mobile phone handset with multiple bands or services. In this situation, the transmitted signal for a first radio service may interfere with the received signal for a second radio service. Such interference can occur even when two or more services utilize different frequency bands as a result of the transmitted power of the first signal being significantly larger than the received power of the second signal. Detrimental interference also may occur when insufficient suppression of sideband signals causes energy leakage from one RF system into a second RF system. Consequently, even a small fraction of the first, transmitted signal can leak into the second, received signal to cause an interference problem.
In addition to EMI arising from an alternate wireless service, EMI may arise from high-speed circuitry in close proximity to the receiver. In mobile phones, for example, a high-speed bus may carry display data from a processor to a high-resolution display. In many cases, increasing the resolution of the display is desirable from a product feature perspective. However, the faster bus data rates associated with increased display resolution typically generate a higher level of radiated EMI, thereby degrading the victim signal of the mobile phone. High-speed buses may include buses carrying high digital data rates, buses with signals that switch rapidly, or buses with signals that switch frequently. That is, very fast rise and fall times of bus signals may be as significant as the actual amount of data throughput.
With respect to the digital systems within wireless devices, a device designer may seek to increase the data rate or bandwidth of each lane, conductor, or channel. The designer might seek increased bandwidth to support higher display resolution, higher display update rates, higher camera resolutions, increased digital memory, integration of handheld computer features, integration of music and video functionalities, etc. A faster data rate may also result from designing a bus with a reduced number of data, address, or control lanes. Reducing bus lanes typically involves increasing the data rate on the remaining lanes to support the existing aggregate throughput. Thus, improvements in displays, cameras, and other subsystems can increase EMI and degrade the performance of the radio receiver in a mobile phone system.
The impact of EMI can increase when high-speed circuitry is routed in close proximity to a radio receiver. In particular, a high-speed signal can cause the emission of EMI. When such a high-speed signal is routed in close proximity to a radio receiver, the receiver can undesirably receive the interference along with the radio signal that is intended for reception.
High-speed buses emitting interference can take multiple forms. For instance, in the mobile phone application described above, the bus carrying the display data is often embodied as a flex cable. A flex cable may also be referred to as a flex circuit or a ribbon cable. A flex cable typically comprises a plurality of conductive traces or channels (typically copper conductors) embedded, laminated, or printed on or in a flexible molding structure such as a plastic or polymer film or some other dielectric or insulating material.
A third source of EMI can be circuits or circuit elements located in close proximity to a victim channel or radio. Like the signals on the high-speed buses, signals flowing through a circuit or circuit component can emit EMI. Representative examples of circuits that can emit a problematic level of EMI include voltage controlled oscillators (VCOs), phased-lock loops (PLLs), switch-mode circuits, amplifiers, and other active or passive circuits or circuit components.
Furthermore, a designer may wish to improve the radio reception of a wireless system, for example to facilitate reception of weak radio signals in a mobile phone application. In other words, improving reception of low-power signals or noisy signals provides another motivation to reduce or to otherwise address interference or crosstalk. A weak radio signal might have less intensity than the noise level of the EMI, for example. Thus, reducing EMI may facilitate reception of weaker radio signals or enable operating a mobile phone or other radio in a noisy environment.
Conventional passive filters are often not effective in contending with EMI. In such instances, an active canceller can help mitigate the interference. One technique for actively canceling signal interference involves sampling the aggressor signal and processing the acquired sample to generate an emulation of the interference, in the form of a simulated or emulated interference signal. A canceller circuit subtracts the emulated interference signal from the received victim signal, which has been corrupted by the interference, to yield a compensated or corrected signal with reduced interference.
Conventional technologies for sampling the aggressor signal are frequently inadequate. Distortion or error associated with sampling the aggressor signal can lead to a diminished match between the interference and the emulation of the interference. One technique for obtaining a sample of the aggressor signal is to directly tap the aggressor line. However, the resulting loss of power on the transmitted aggressor line is detrimental in many applications, such as in hand-held radios, cell phones, or handset applications. Directly tapping into the aggressor line can also adversely impact system modularity.
The interference sampling system should generally be situated in close proximity to the source or sources of interference. This configuration helps the sampling system obtain samples of the interference signals while avoiding sampling the radio signal. Inadvertent sampling of the radio signal could result in the canceller circuit removing the victim radio signal from the compensated signal, thereby degrading the compensated signal. In other words, conventional technologies for obtaining an interference sample often impose awkward or unwieldy constraints on the location of the sampling elements.
For handset applications, the sampling system should generally be compatible with the handset architecture and its compact configuration. Radio handsets, such as mobile phones, typically contain numerous components that design engineers may struggle to integrate using conventional design technologies. Strict placement requirements of conventional interference sampling systems frequently increase system design complexity. In other words, conventional interference sampling systems often fail to offer an adequate level of design flexibility as a result of positioning constraints.
Another shortcoming of most conventional technologies for active EMI cancellation involves inadequate management of power consumption. An active EMI cancellation system may consume an undesirably high level of electrical power that can shorten battery life in handset applications. That is, conventional EMI cancellation technology, when applied in a cellular telephone or other portable device, often draws too much power from the battery or other energy source of the portable device. Consumers typically view extended battery life as a desirable feature for a portable wireless communication product. Thus, reducing power consumption to extend usage time between battery recharges is often a priority to design engineers.
To address these representative deficiencies in the art, what is needed is an improved capability for addressing, correcting, or canceling signal interference in communication systems. A need exists for a compact system for sampling an aggressor signal and/or associated interference in a communication system, such as a cellular device. A further need exists for an interference sampling system that affords an engineer design modularity or flexibility. Another need exists in the art for a means to control the gain and phase of the canceling signal with active EMI cancellers. There is a further need for such gain and phase compensation to be continuously adaptive in nature to address any time-varying changes in the aggressor signal or any changes in the manner in which the aggressor signal couples to the victim signal. There is another need in the art for active EMI canceller control loops that avoid interference with the desired receive signal or that avoid adding extra noise to the received signal. Yet another need exists for a system that reduces or suppresses signal interference while managing power consumption. A capability addressing one or more of these needs would support operating compact communication systems at high data rates and/or with improved signal fidelity.
The present invention supports compensating for signal interference, such as EMI or crosstalk, occurring between two or more communication channels or between two or more communication elements in a communication system. Compensating for interference can improve signal quality or enhance communication bandwidth or information carrying capability.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method or system can apply active noise cancellation to mitigate, suppress, reduce, cancel, or otherwise address interference, such as EMI. Active noise cancellation can involve simulating, mimicking, or emulating undesirable interference, thereby generating an emulated interference signal resembling the actual interference that the aggressor signal has imposed on the victim signal. Subtracting the emulated interference from the victim signal can result in the emulated interference and the actual interference canceling or negating one another. In other words, a noise cancellation system can address interference by creating simulated interference and applying, typically via subtraction, that simulated interference to a signal or channel that suffers from actual interference. Generating the emulated interference and/or applying emulated interference to the victim signal can comprise matching one or more signal parameters of the emulated interference with one or more corresponding signal parameters of the actual interference. The systems, devices, operations, or methods through which the interference cancellation system generates the emulated interference can be referred to as an emulation channel.
The interference cancellation system can control, manipulate, adjust, or optimize various parameters of the emulation channel, such as gain, amplification, phase, delay, filtering variables, center frequency, pole-zero locations, etc. The interference cancellation system can vary one or more of these parameters in a manner that seeks to minimize the energy, or to control some other attribute, of the residual interference that remains on the victim signal after cancellation. Moreover, the interference cancellation system can comprise a feedback control loop, or some circuit, that updates or dynamically adjusts the emulation parameters based on feedback from or monitoring of the victim signal. The dynamic adjustments can provide interference suppression while compensating for fluctuations in the communication system, the operating environment, the aggressor signal, or some other operating factor or condition. A control circuit that implements the dynamic adjustments can have at least two modes of operation. In a first mode, the control circuit can adjust a first signal parameter, such as amplitude or gain. In a second mode, the control circuit can adjust a second signal parameter, such as phase or delay.
The discussion of interference cancellation presented in this summary is for illustrative purposes only. Various aspects of the present invention may be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the disclosed embodiments and by reference to the drawings and any claims that may follow. Moreover, other aspects, systems, methods, features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such aspects, systems, methods, features, advantages, and objects are to be included within this description, are to be within the scope of the present invention, and are to be protected by any accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the invention can be better understood with reference to the above drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Moreover, in the drawings, reference numerals designate corresponding, but not necessarily identical, parts throughout the different views.
The present invention supports compensating for signal interference, such as EMI or crosstalk, occurring between two or more communication channels or between two or more communication elements in a communication system. Compensating for interference can improve signal quality or enhance communication bandwidth or information carrying capability. A communication channel may comprise a transmission line, a printed circuit board (PCB) trace, a flex circuit trace, an electrical conductor, a waveguide, a bus, a communication antenna, a medium that provides a signal path, or an active or passive circuit or circuit element such as a filter, oscillator, diode, VCO, PLL, amplifier, digital or mixed signal integrated circuit. Thus, a channel can comprise a global system for mobile communications (GSM) device, a processor, a detector, a source, a diode, an inductor, an integrated circuit, a connector, a circuit trace, or a digital signal processing (DSP) chip, to name only a few possibilities.
Moreover, exemplary embodiment of the present invention can support canceling, correcting, addressing, or compensating for interference, EMI, or crosstalk associated with one or more communication paths in a communication system, such as a high-speed digital data communication system in a portable radio or a cellular telephone. An interference sensor can obtain a signal representation or a sample of an interference signal or a communication signal that imposes interference or of the interference. The interference sensor can be integrated into a structure, such as a flex cable or a circuit board, that supports or comprises at least one conductor that imposes or receives the interference. In an exemplary embodiment, the interference sensor can be a dedicated conductor or circuit trace that is near an aggressor conductor, a victim conductor, or an EM field associated with the EMI. The sensor can be coupled to an interference compensation circuit. The interference compensation circuit can have at least two modes of operation. In the first mode, the circuit can actively generate or output a correction signal. In the second mode, the circuit can withhold generating or outputting the correction signal, thereby conserving power and may also avoid inadvertently degrading the signal-to-noise ratio of the involved communication signals.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a sensor can be disposed in the proximity of one or both channels. From this position, the sensor can obtain a sample or a representation of the interference or of the aggressor signal, which produced, induced, generated, or otherwise caused the interference. The sensor can comprise a sensing or sampling channel that obtains the sample. As an aggressor channel transmits communication signals, such as digital data or analog information, producing interference on a victim channel, the sensing channel can sample the aggressing communication signals and/or the interference. The sensing channel can be, for example, a conductor dedicated to obtaining a representation of the aggressing signal or the interference. Such a sensing conductor can be near a conductor carrying aggressing signals, near a conductor carrying victim signals, or in an EM field associated with the aggressing channel and/or the victim channel. The sensing conductor can be physically separated from the aggressing conductor while coupling to the aggressing conductor via an inductive field, a magnetic field, an electrical field, and/or an EM field. That is, the sensing conductor can obtain a sample of the aggressor signal without necessarily physically contacting or directly touching the aggressor conductor, for example.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a circuit that cancels, corrects, or compensates for or otherwise addresses communication interference can have at least two modes of operation. The interference compensation circuit could be coupled to the sensor, for example. In the first mode, the interference compensation circuit can generate, produce, or provide a signal that, when applied to a communication signal, reduces interference associated with that communication signal. In the second mode, the interference compensation circuit can refrain from producing or outputting the interference correction signal. The second mode can be viewed as a standby, idle, passive, sleep, or power-saving mode. Operating the interference compensation circuit in the second mode can offer a reduced level of power consumption.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method or system can cancel EMI by matching the amplitude, phase, or delay of an emulated aggressor signal to the actual aggressor signal incurred by the victim. The method can be based on an analog control loop that minimizes the energy of the residual or cancelled aggressor signal. In other words, the gain and phase compensation of the emulation path may be adjusted to minimize the energy in the remaining aggressor signal after cancellation.
As an alternative to manipulating emulation parameters to drive down the energy of the interference signal, the parameters can be adjusted based on a data rate or a bit error rate. That data rate or bit error rate can be the data rate or the bit error rate of the received victim signal, for example. In one exemplary embodiment, the parameters are controlled according to signal integrity or reception strength. For example, the number of reception “bars” on a cellular telephone can provide control feedback.
In one exemplary embodiment, an inter-integrated circuit (I2C) bus or a serial peripheral interface (SPI) bus can be used for adaptation of the cancellation system. Thus, the emulation parameters can be varied based on information transmitted over an I2C bus or an SPI bus.
The gain and phase of the emulation channel are two parameters that may be controlled in a cancellation device. The emulation channel may also control delay or other emulation filter parameters. The control loop can work to minimize the energy of the residual aggressor after cancellation. This method of control is scalable to control a varying number of emulation channel parameters. The gain and phase of the emulation channel are exemplary parameters that can be controlled. Other parameters that might be controlled are delay and emulation filter parameters, such as center frequency or pole-zero locations.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a high-impedance tap can directly monitor a victim channel that is subject to detrimental interference. Accordingly, the tap can provide feedback to an interference cancellation device, or a controller thereof. In one exemplary embodiment, a single set of RF components support two or more signal sampling operations. Such dual-use may be advantageous in that offsets between multiple sets of RF components or multiple sampling points can be eliminated, thereby reducing calibration requirements. Employing a single RF path may also significantly reduce power consumption. In one exemplary embodiment, a scalable method can control the gain, phase, and other emulation channel parameters as required.
Turning to discuss each of the drawings presented in
Referring now to
Increasing the data rate or bandwidth of each lane, conductor, or channel of the display and camera busses 110 and 120 is often desirable. This desire may be motivated by a need to support higher display/camera resolution, which entails faster throughput commensurate with increasing the number of image pixels. This desire may also be motivated by a desire to reduce the number of data lanes in the buses 110 and 120, thereby involving an increase in the data rate on the remaining lanes, or bus lines, to support the existing aggregate throughput. Thus, improvements in the display 140 or camera system 145 (e.g. higher resolution or condensed communication bus) can degrade the performance of the radio receiver 105 in the mobile phone system 100.
Furthermore, improving reception of low-power signals or noisy signals provides another motivation to reduce or to otherwise address interference 150 or crosstalk. A weak radio signal might have less intensity than the noise level of the EMI 150, for example. Thus, it is desired to reduce the EMI 150 to facilitate reception of weaker radio signals or to enable operating a mobile phone or other radio in a noisy environment.
The communication system 100 comprises an interference compensation or correcting circuit 130, depicted in the exemplary form of an integrated circuit 130. The interference compensation circuit 130 delivers an interference compensation signal into or onto a channel that is a recipient of interference, to cancel, mitigate, or otherwise compensate for the received interference. The interference compensation signal is derived or produced from a sample of an aggressor communication signal that is propagating on another channel, generating the incurred interference or crosstalk.
The interference compensation circuit 130 can be coupled between the source 110 and 120 of the interference 150 and the victim device 105 that suffers from the interference 150. In this configuration, the interference compensation circuit 130 can sample or receive a portion of the signal that is causing the interference and can compose the interference compensation signal for application to the victim device 105 that is impacted by the unwanted interference 150. In other words, the interference compensation circuit 130 can couple to the channels 110, 120 that are causing the interference 150, can generate an interference compensation signal, and can apply the interference compensation signal to the recipient 105 of the interference to provide interference cancellation, compensation, or correction.
A battery, not shown on
The interference compensation circuit 130 can generate the interference compensation signal via a model of the interference effect. The model can generate the interference compensation signal in the form of a signal that estimates, approximates, emulates, or resembles the interference signal. The interference compensation signal can have a waveform or shape that matches the actual interference signal. A setting or adjustment that adjusts the model, such as a set of modeling parameters, can define characteristics of this waveform.
The interference compensation circuit 130 receives the signal that is representative of the aggressor signal (or alternatively of the interference itself) from a sensor 115, 125 that is adjacent one or both of the EMI producing data busses 110, 120. In an exemplary embodiment, the sensors 115, 125 comprise conductors, associated with one or both of the data bus channels 110, 120. The sensors 115, 125 are dedicated to obtaining a sample of the aggressor signal. For example, the data bus 110 can have a plurality of conductors that transmit data between the camera 145 and the DSP chip 135 and at least one other conductor that senses, sniffs, or samples the aggressor signal, or an associated EM or EMI field, rather than carrying data for direct receipt. Moreover, one of the data bus conductors can function as a sensor during a time interval when that specific conductor is not purposefully conveying data.
In an exemplary embodiment, the sensors 115, 125 are integrated into a common structure to which the conductors of the data bus 110, 120 adhere or are attached. For example, the sensor 115, 125 can be attached to, or part of, a flex cable. In one exemplary embodiment, the sensor 115, 125 comprises a conductive trace deposited on the flex cable. In one exemplary embodiment, the sensors 115, 125 couple to the communication signals propagating on the data buses 110, 120 via the EM field of those signals. For example, the coupling may be via induction rather than through a direct connection. Thus, the sensors 115, 125 can be isolated from the aggressor channel below a threshold frequency and coupled to the aggressor channel above a threshold frequency. Moreover, the sensors 115, 125 can be isolated from the aggressor channel below a threshold voltage and coupled to the aggressor channel above a threshold voltage.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the sensors 115, 125 comprises an interference sampler located in close proximity to an interference source. In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the interference compensation circuit 130 samples its reference signal from a conductor that is in the vicinity of a victim antenna. In yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the interference sensor 115, 125 comprises a sampling mechanism embedded as a lane within the bus path 110, 120 of the interference source. For example, the sampling mechanism can comprise an additional conductive line running parallel to the other data lines in a flex cable, or in a rigid printed circuit board. Embedding the sampling mechanism can provide compact size, design flexibility, modularity, signal integrity, and minimal power draw from the sensed line, which are useful attributes for a successful sampling mechanism and EMI canceller or interference cancellation/compensation system.
Embedding or integrating the sensor 115, 125 or sampling mechanism in a unitary, monolithic, or integrated structure that comprises the bus path 110, 120 provides close proximity between the sensor 115, 125 and the interference source or sources. The resulting close proximity facilitates strong sampling of the interference relative to the radio signal.
Embedding or integrating the sensor 115, 125 with the bus path 110, 120 offers the system designer (and PCB board designer in particular) design flexibility. For example, the design engineer can be freed from the constraint of allocating board space near the interference source for the sampling mechanism, as would be required for an antenna implementation. The system designer can receive relief from the task of designing an antenna according to one or more specific reception requirements, such as a field pattern and a frequency range.
An integrated, or embedded, sensor solution based on dedicating a conductor 115, 125 of a multi-conductor bus 110, 120 to sensing can have an inherent capability to receive the EMI interference. The inherent receptivity can mirror the inherent emission properties of the other conductors that generate interference. In other words, since emission and reception are typically reciprocal phenomena, configuring the sensing conductor to have a form similar to the radiating conductor (aggressor) can provide inherent reception of the EMI frequencies of interest.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the embedded interference sensor 115, 125 can run, extend, or span the entire length of the data bus 110, 120 that has data lines emitting the aggressing EMI.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an interference sensing conductor 115 can extend a limited portion of the total span of the data bus 110, 120, thereby helping the data bus 110, 120 maintain a compact width. Another exemplary embodiment which can minimize the width of the data bus has the sampling mechanism 115, 125 crossing over or under the data lines 110, 120. The crossing can be a perpendicular crossing. The sensing conductor and the data conductors can form an obtuse angle or an acute angle, for example.
As illustrated in
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the embedded interference sensor 115 receives EMI interference not only from a primary element, such as its associated data bus 110, but also from other sources on the handset, such as the display 140, the camera 145, the DSP 135, etc. Thus, a single sensor 115 can sample multiple sources of interference to support correcting the interference from two or more sources via that single sensor and its associated interference compensation circuit 130.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the interference compensation circuit 130 samples its reference signal (i.e. the aggressor source) from a conducting element 115, 125 that receives radiated EMI 150. This sampling approach can sense the EMI 150 (or a filtered version thereof), or the aggressor signal in a non-intrusive manner. Specifically, the aggressor data line/source can remain essentially undisturbed physically. The data bus 110, 120 can function with little or no loss of power associated with the sensor 115, 125 that is coupled to thereto via inductive or capacitive coupling, typically without physical contact or direct electrical contact. That is, a dielectric material can separate the sensing conductor 115, 125 from the aggressor conductor, while providing inductive, capacitive, or EM coupling.
After sampling the reference signal, the interference compensation circuit 130 generates a compensation or cancellation signal which is adjusted in magnitude, phase, and delay such that it cancels a substantial portion of the interference signal coupled onto the victim antenna. In other words, the reference signal, which comprises the sample, is filtered and processed so it becomes a negative of the interference signal incurred by the received victim signal. The parameters of the magnitude, phase, and delay adjustment are variable and can be controlled to optimize cancellation performance.
Turning now to
In one exemplary embodiment, the sensor 115, 125 comprises a conductive trace deposited on the flex cable 200. The sensors 115, 125 can be formed into or integrated with the flex cable 200 at the time that the flex cable 200 is manufactured, for example as a step in a manufacturing process that involves lithography. The flex cable 200 can alternatively be adapted following its manufacture, for example by adhering the sensor to the flex cable 200. That is, a conventional flex cable can be acquired from a commercial vendor and processed to attach the sensor 115, 125 to that cable.
Turning now to
The interference compensation circuit 130 draws or obtains power or energy from the power supply 360, and its associated battery 365. As will be discussed in further detail below, the interference compensation circuit 130 can operate in a plurality of modes, each having a different level of consumption of battery energy.
The interference sensor 115 obtains a sample of the aggressor signal by, for example, coupling to the interfering field. The sampled interfering signal is fed through the compensation circuit 130 starting with the Variable Phase Adjuster 305. The phase adjuster may match, at the summation node 325, the phase of the emulated compensation signal with the phase of the interfering signal coupled onto the victim antenna 340. That is, the phase adjuster 305 places the phase of the compensation signal in phase with respect to the phase of the interference so that, when one is subtracted from the other, the compensation signal can cancel, or reduce, the interference. The cancellation can occur at the summation node 325 by subtracting the coupled signal onto the victim antenna 340 from the emulated signal generated by the interference compensation circuit 130 using the interfering signal as sampled at sensor 115.
In an alternative embodiment of the compensation circuit 130, the phase adjuster 305 can adjust the emulated signal phase to be 180 degrees out of phase with the interfering coupled signal. In that case, the summation node 325 adds the two signals rather than performing a subtraction.
In one exemplary embodiment, the phase shifter 305 comprises quadrature hybrids, and four silicon hyper-abrupt junction varactor diodes, along with various resistors, inductors and capacitors for biasing, pull-up, and signal conditioning. In another exemplary embodiment, the phase shifter 305 comprises an active circuit.
The optional emulation filter 315 can follow the variable phase shifter 305 in the cancellation path. The emulation filter 315 is typically a band pass (BP) filter that models the channel coupling and is also tunable in order to compensate for any drifts in channel center frequency.
In one exemplary embodiment, the emulation filter 315 comprises lumped elements and varactor diodes. The varactor diodes help change or control the center frequency of the emulation channel.
In one exemplary embodiment, the emulation filter 315 is a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter. The FIR filter can comprise taps and tap spacings that are extracted from or determined according to the coupling channel characteristics. In order to have robust cancellation for improved signal integrity of the communication system 100, the emulation filter 325 typically should match, in general, the coupling channel characteristics within the frequency band of interest.
The next stage of the cancellation path is the controllable delay adjuster 320, which may provide a match between the group delay of the coupled signal through the victim antenna 340 and the group delay of the emulated compensation signal at the summation node 325.
The output of the delay adjuster 320 feeds into the VGA 310. The VGA 310 can match the emulated signal amplitude to the amplitude of the interference signal at the summation node 325. Whereas the emulation filter 315 models the frequency characteristics (i.e. attenuation of frequencies relative to other frequencies) of the coupling channel, the VGA 310 applies a gain that is constant in magnitude across the frequency band of interest. Thus, the emulation filter 315 and the VGA 310 can function collaboratively to match the magnitude of the channel's coupling response on an absolute scale, rather than merely a relative scale.
The VGA 310 feeds the interference compensation signal to the summation node 325. In turn, the summation node 325 applies the compensation signal to the victim channel to negate, cancel, attenuate, or suppress the interference.
In one exemplary embodiment, the summation node 325 comprises a directional coupler. In an alternative exemplary embodiment, the summation node 325 comprises an active circuit such as a summer, which is typically a three-terminal device, or an output buffer, which is typically a two-terminal device.
For best performance, the summation node 325 should introduce essentially no mismatch to the victim antenna signal path. That is, the summation node 325 should ideally maintain characteristic impedance of the system 130. Nevertheless, in some situations, small or controlled levels of impedance mismatch can be tolerated. Avoiding impedance mismatch implies that the summation node 325 should have a high output impedance at the tap. Additionally, the summation node 325 should not add significant loss to the victim antenna receive path, as such loss can adversely affect receiver sensitivity. For illustrative purposes, this discussion of impedance matching references a system with a characteristic impedance of 50-ohms; however, exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be applied to systems with essentially any characteristic impedance.
While
The interference compensation circuit 130, which can be viewed as an EMI canceller, offers flexibility in that the cancellation or compensation parameters can be adjusted or controlled to optimize the match of the emulated coupling channel to the actual EMI coupling channel. More specifically, the controller 335 and its associated power detector 330 provide a feedback loop for dynamically adjusting the circuit elements 305, 310, 315, 320 in a manner that provides robust correction of interference. A discussion of exemplary embodiments of the interference compensation circuit 130 follows below with reference to
Turning now to
More specifically,
Turning now to
The spectra 520, and 620 characterize a 450 megabits-per-second (“Mbps”) (PRBS-31) interfering signal coupled onto a 2.1 GHz antenna that is in close proximity to a flex cable carrying the 450 Mbps signal. In the frequency band of interest 510, the compensation achieved approximately 12 dB of interference suppression.
Referring now to
In a handset application, operating the interference compensation circuit 130 in a power-saving mode can extend the operation time of a single battery charge, thereby enhancing the commercial attractiveness of the handset. Power reduction can be implemented or achieved without degrading interference compensation performance.
Conditions occur in wireless handset devices that provide an opportunity for reduced power consumption. In particular, many of the EMI sources are not always active and, therefore, are not always emitting interference. For situations in which the interference compensating circuit 130 and its associated controller 335 do not need to apply a compensation signal, the circuit 130 can transition to a sleep or stand-by mode of reduced power consumption. That is, rather than having one or more circuit elements receiving power while not producing an output or actively manipulating signals, power can be removed from those elements or from a selected set of circuit elements.
Thus, in one exemplary embodiment of the present patent invention, the system 100 experiences states in which operating certain components of the interference compensation circuit 130 is unnecessary. In such states, the controller 335 can place those components in a low-power or standby mode or can remove power entirely from those components. For example, when an EMI source is not active for a threshold amount of time, the interference compensation circuit 130 can transition to the standby mode. More specifically, when the bus 110 is not actively carrying data traffic, the interference compensation circuit 130 can switch to the standby mode to conserve battery power.
In one exemplary embodiment, the sensor 115 provides a signal that is indicative of whether the bus 110 is active. That is, the level, voltage, amplitude, or intensity of the signal that the sensor 115 output can provide an indication of whether the bus is actively transmitting aggressor signals.
When appropriate conditions are met, electrical power can be removed from the components 305, 310, 315, 320 that generate the emulated EMI signal. And, power can additionally or optionally be removed from some or all of the circuitry of the control module 335. However, components used to store the emulation characteristics or parameters, i.e. the emulation channel settings that match the coupling channel, can be kept active so as to immediately or quickly restore the interference compensation circuit's emulation channel to its last known state when the EMI source (e.g. the aggressor channel 110) is reactivated. In other words, the memory system of the controller 335 can retain power access to avoid loss of the parametric values stored in memory. Keeping the parametric values in memory facilitates rapid restoration to active cancellation upon reactivation of the EMI source. Thus, recalling the operational settings of the phase adjuster 305, the emulation filter 315, the delay adjuster 320, and the VGA 310 avoids the interference that would occur if the emulation was retrained from an arbitrary reset state following transition from standby mode to active mode.
Operating in the standby mode can comprise either full powering down one or more circuit components and/or operating in a state of reduced power usage. In some instances, the latter may be preferred in order to rapidly bring the component out of the standby state when the EMI source is reactivated.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a standby signal instructs or triggers the interference compensation circuit 130 to transition to its power-saving or standby state. The standby signal can also trigger the transition from the power-saving or standby state to an active state. A device transmitting the source of the EMI, or an associated power detector, can generate a signal indicating that it is actively transmitting data. For example, the DSP chip 135 that sends data to the display 140 in the mobile phone system 100 can output an binary signal or code to indicate that it not transmitting data and consequently emitting EMI.
As another example, the camera imaging sensor 145 that sends data to a the DSP chip 135 can output a binary signal or a digital code to indicate whether or not it is transmitting data that could produce EMI. As yet another example, a radio device that uses time-division multiplexing can provide the triggering standby signal. Such a radio device can be used in GSM or wideband code division multiple access (W-CDMA) applications, for example. In this situation, the radio may output a binary signal to mark the time divisions or intervals in which it is transmitting data. During those portions of the duplexing stage, the interference compensation should be active, as the transmitted signal can aggress a second radio device on a wireless handset.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention a power detector, such as the detector 330 but attached to the output of the sampler 115, examines the sampled EMI signal and generates the standby signal based on properties of the sampled EMI signal. For example, a standby state can be set if the detector 330 determines that power of the sampled EMI signal is below a given or predetermined threshold. Conversely, the interference compensation circuit 130 can be activated when the detected power moves above the threshold.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the standby state can be declared if the time-localized peak amplitude of the sampled EMI signal falls below a given threshold. One advantage of this embodiment is that its implementation does not typically require an extra pin on the device package to be fed a dedicated standby signal. Instead, the standby signal could be derived from an available pin already used for EMI cancellation.
In one exemplary embodiment, a transition between standby and active mode can occur in response to a change in the strength of a reception signal. For example, a circuit can become active when the number of reception “bars” on a cellular telephone reach a threshold level. In one exemplary embodiment, a transition can occur in response to a change in a data rate or a bit rate, for example.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, all the components 305, 310, 315, 320 of the emulation channel that are used to generate the emulated EMI signal from the sensor's sampled EMI source signal can be placed in the low-power standby state. In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, one or more of the following components are placed in standby mode in response to an occurrence of a standby condition: the phase adjuster 305, the BP channel emulation filter 315, the delay adjuster 320, and the VGA 310. Reducing power consumption of those devices components 305, 310, 315, 320 facilitates significant power savings when the EMI source is inactive.
The controller 335, which can also be referred to as a control module, can be inactive when the EMI source is inactive. With no source of EMI and an inactive controller 335, interference is not typically problematic. More specifically, no EMI occurs, and the emulation path is producing a zero emulation signal. In many circumstances, an improvement in interference performance can result from deactivating the emulation path when no source of EMI is active. If the emulation channel remains active when no EMI source is active, the emulation channel parameters may drift towards a set of values that poorly match the underlying EMI coupling channel. In this situation, activating the EMI source can result in poor tuning that causes the interference compensation circuit 130 to learn new, more effective parameters. In other words, when the interference compensation circuit 130 is inactive, an improperly tuned coupling channel can still produce a zero emulation signal since the sampled EMI source signal will be zero.
In one embodiment of the present invention, all of the components, or essentially all of the active components, of the control module can be placed in the standby state when the standby signal is asserted, thereby providing a high level of power savings.
In one exemplary alternative embodiment of the present invention, the register or memory elements used to store the controllable parameters in the emulation channel are fully powered, while the rest of the control module 335 is deactivated. This embodiment facilitates rapidly or immediately returning the emulation channel to its pre-standby state when the system exits the standby mode. In other words, once the system leaves standby mode, the interference compensation circuit 130 can resume cancellation from a previously-known and accurate channel model, rather than starting the cancellation from an arbitrary reset state. Resuming operation of the interference compensation circuit 130 from an arbitrary set of parameters may take an undesirably long period of time prior to convergence to an accurate channel model. During this learning time, EMI cancellation performance may be insufficient or inadequate.
Turning now to
At Step 705, a data transmitter, such as the camera 145 or the DSP chip 135 issues a standby signal that can comprise a digital code. The code carries the status of the transmitter, for example whether the transmitter is actively transmitting data or is in a passive state between two time periods of data transmission. In one embodiment, the code specifies whether the transmitter is preparing to actively transmit data or to change between operational states.
At Step 710, the controller 335 receives the standby signal and determines whether the transmitter is in an active state of transmitting data or a passive state. Decision Step 715 branches the flow of Process 700 to Step 725 if the standby signal indicates that the transmitter is active. If, on the other hand, the standby signal indicates that the transmitter is passive, then decision Step 720 follows Step 715.
At decision Step 720, the controller 335 determines whether the interference compensation circuit 130 is in an active mode or is otherwise in a passive mode. If the interference compensation circuit 130 is in an active mode, then Step 730 follows Step 720.
At Step 730, the controller 335 stores the current or present compensation parameters in memory and removes power from the emulation channel components 305, 310, 315, 320. This action places the interference compensation circuit 130 in a standby or power-saving mode. The stored compensation parameters typically comprise the settings of each of the adjustable components 305, 310, 315, 320 of the emulation channel.
If at decision Step 720, the controller 335 determines that the interference compensation circuit 130 is in the standby mode rather than the active mode, then Step 740 follows Step 720. At Step 740, the interference compensation circuit 130 remains in the standby mode.
If decision step 715 branches the flow of Process 700 to Step 725 rather than Step 720 (based on the standby signal indicating active data transmission), then at decision Step 725, the controller 335 determines whether the interference compensation circuit 130 is in active mode or standby mode.
If the interference compensation circuit 130 is in active mode, then Step 745 follows Step 725. At Step 745, the interference compensation circuit 130 remains in active mode.
If the controller 335 determines at decision Step 725 that the interference compensation circuit 130 is in standby mode rather than active mode, then Step 735 follows Step 725. At Step 735, the controller 335 recalls the current or last-used compensation parameters from memory and restores power to the powered-down components. Restoring power typically comprises initializing each of the adjustable components 305, 310, 315, 320 of the emulation channel with the parametric settings recalled from memory.
Step 750 follows execution of either of Steps 735 or 745. At Step 750, the interference compensation circuit 130 generates an estimate of the interference based on processing the aggressor sample, which the sensor 115 obtained. As discussed above with reference to
At Step 755, the interference compensation circuit 130 applies the interference estimate to the victim channel to cancel, suppress, or correct the interference occurring thereon.
Following execution of any of Steps 730, 740, and 755, Process 700 loops back to and executes Step 705 as discussed above. Execution of Process 700 continues following the loop iteration.
Referring now to
As illustrated, a tap of the aggressor signal 850 is provided to the emulation channel 810 which acts upon the aggressor signal to mimic the aggressor signal that was coupled onto the victim signal. In coupling to the victim signal, the aggressor signal may have suffered one or more of phase shift, amplitude loss, and frequency selective coupling, for example. The stages 315, 310, 305 within the emulation channel 810 represent these coupling effects. Thus, the stages 315, 310, 305 process the signal from the aggressor tap 850 to create a signal that matches the aggressor signal, as coupled into the victim signal.
To generate the emulated interference signal, the emulation channel 810 comprises mechanisms such as the primary emulation filter 315, a VGA 310, and a variable phase adjuster 305. In the illustrated embodiment, the primary emulation filter 315 is a fixed filter that serves as a coarse-scale model of the coupling channel. The channel modeling is then refined by the variable gain 310 and phase adjust 305 stages to fine-tune the match to the actual coupling channel. The emulated coupling signal generated by the emulation channel 810 may then be subtracted from the corrupted victim signal at the summation node 325. When the parameters of the emulation channel 810 have appropriate settings, the generated emulated aggressor signal should substantially equal the actual aggressor signal, which is incurred by the received victim. Thus, after the summation node 325, the aggressor should be substantially removed from the victim signal.
The phase control stage 335A determines the amount of phase adjustment in the phase adjuster 305 by generating an analog control signal αφ (alpha, sub phi). This control signal is fed into the phase adjuster 305 and directly determines the amount of phase adjustment applied in the emulation channel.
Similarly, the gain control stage 335B sets the amount of gain adjustment in the VGA 310 by generating an analog control signal αg (alpha, sub g). This control signal is fed into the VGA 310 and directly specifies the amount of gain adjustment applied in the emulation channel.
Referring now to
The emulated aggressor signal is split into a pair of emulated aggressor signals to which an additional phase adjustment or a temporal delay is applied. A phase of Δφ1 (delta sub phi one) is added to the first signal of the split pair via the phase shifter (or delay) 910A, thereby yielding an output signal that represents the emulation signal with total phase adjustment of φ0+Δφ1. Likewise a phase of Δφ2 (delta sub phi two) is added to the second of the split pair via phase shifter 910B to yield an output signal that represents the emulation signal with a total phase adjustment of φ0+Δφ2.
Like the input emulation signal, the corrupted victim signal is also split into a first and second corrupted victim signal. Summation node 920A subtracts the output of the first phase shifter 910A from the first of the split pair of the corrupted victim signal to yield the aggressor-cancelled victim signal using a phase adjustment of φ0+Δφ1. Summation node 920b subtracts the output of the second phase shifter 910b from the second of the split pair of the corrupted victim signal to yield the aggressor-cancelled victim signal using a phase adjustment of φ0+Δφ2.
The energy of each of the aggressor-cancelled victim signals is then obtained by application of a power-detecting device 930A, 930B followed by a low-pass filter (LPF) 940A, 940B to each of the signals.
The outputs of the LPFs 940A and 940B represent the energy of the aggressor-cancelled victim signals with extra phase adjustments of Δφ1 and Δφ2 (beyond the phase of φ0 applied in the emulation channel), respectively. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art having benefit of this disclosure, for each of the aggressor-cancelled victim signals, the energy of the aggressor-cancelled victim signal may equal the sum of (i) the energy of the victim signal alone plus (ii) the energy of the cancelled aggressor component. This decomposition holds because the aggressor and victim signal are statistically independent signals. This energy-decomposition property is relevant because the subtraction device 950, subtracts the pair of energy signals for the aggressor-cancelled victim signals.
Because both aggressor-cancelled victim signals share the same victim component, the energy contributions of the victim signal can nullify each other at the output of the subtraction node 950. In other words, it is equivalent to the victim signal being zero or not present. Thus, the output of the subtraction node 950 is the difference of the energies of the cancelled aggressor with an extra phase of Δφ1 and the cancelled aggressor with an extra phase of Δφ2. In other words, the output of the subtraction node 950 is equivalent to the mathematical derivative of the residual aggressor energy with respect to phase. In particular, it approximates the negative derivative around the phase value φ0+(Δφ1+Δφ2)/2.
By running the output of the subtraction node 950 through an integrating device 960, and using the integrated output as the value of αφ to directly control the value of φ0 in the phase adjuster 305, the system can converge to a state that results in the subtraction node 950 output being zero, or nearly zero. This state can correspond to the energy of the residual aggressor being minimized with respect to phase adjustment, and thus an optimum control value is achieved.
Referring now to
The emulated aggressor signal is split into a pair of emulated aggressor signals to which an additional gain or attenuation is applied. An additional gain of 1+Δg is applied to the first signal of the split pair via the amplifier 1010A to yield an output signal that represents the emulation signal with total gain of A0+A0Δg. Similarly, a gain of 1−Δg is applied to the second of the split pair via amplifier 1010B to yield an output signal that represents the emulation signal with a total gain of A0−A0Δg. The effect of amplifier 1010B may also be interpreted as attenuation since the gain factor 1−Δg is typically less than one.
Like the input emulation signal, the corrupted victim signal is also split into a first and second corrupted victim signal. Summation node 1020A subtracts the output of the first amplifier 1010A from the first of the split pair of the corrupted victim signal to yield the aggressor-cancelled victim signal using a gain of A0+A0Δg. Summation node 1020B subtracts the output of the second amplifier 1010B from the second of the split pair of the corrupted victim signal to yield the aggressor-cancelled victim signal using a gain of A0−A0Δg.
The energy of each of the aggressor-cancelled victim signals is then obtained by application of a power-detecting device 1030A, 1030B followed by a low-pass filter (LPF) 1040A, 1040B to each of the signals. The outputs of the LPFs 1040A and 1040B represent the energy of the aggressor-cancelled victim signals with extra gains of 1+Δg and 1−Δg (beyond the gain of A0 applied in the emulation channel), respectively. The subtraction device 1050, subtracts the pair of energy signals for the aggressor-cancelled victim signals. The output of the subtraction node 1050 is the difference of the energies of the cancelled aggressor with an extra gain of 1+Δg and the cancelled aggressor with an extra gain of 1−Δg. In other words, output of the subtraction node 1050 is equivalent to the mathematical derivative of the residual aggressor energy with respect to gain. In particular, it approximates the negative derivative around the gain value A0.
By running the output of the subtraction node 1050 through an integrating device 1060 and using the integrated output as the value of αg to directly control the value of A0 in the VGA 310, the system can converge to a state which results in the subtraction node 1050 output being zero or nearly zero. This state corresponds to the energy of the residual aggressor being substantially minimized with respect to gain adjustment. Thus, a substantially optimum control value may be achieved.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
Benefits from reducing circuit redundancy can include lower power consumption, reduced parasitic effects, and smaller circuit size. That is, a beneficial circuit can be realized by integrating the phase and gain control modules into a single control module 335C within the EMI cancellation device 130B. The combined module 335C takes a third input (beyond the corrupted received victim signal and emulated aggressor signal) to select the operational mode. In other words, the module 335 can be characterized as a controller that has two modes of operation, one for gain control and one for phase control.
A mode-selector signal serves as a switch, controlling whether the module 335C should adjust the gain or the phase of the emulation channel 810 at any given time. The control module 335C outputs both the gain control signal αg and the phase control signal αφ. In one mode, the control module 335C makes gain adjustments while holding phase constant. In the other mode, the control module 335C makes phase adjustments while holding gain constant. In an alternative embodiment, gain and phase may be concurrently adjusted.
Referring now to
When the mode selection input to the control module 335C specifies gain adjustment, the five switches 1210A-1210E are set as shown in
When the mode selection input to the control module 335C specifies phase adjustment, the five switches 1210A-1210E all change to the opposite state of that shown in
The mode selection input signal to the control module 335C can be obtained in a variety of ways. For example, a clock signal can be used as the model selection signal to periodically alternate between gain and phase adjustment according to a fixed interval. Another option is to use the derivative signal output from the summing node 950. For example, when the derivative value falls below a preset threshold, indicating that the current adjustment mode has reached a nearly optimum value, the mode selection signal can be toggled to change the mode of operation. This can be done on a continuing basis to constantly maintain substantially optimized gain and phase adjustments.
Thus, the control module 335C can switch between operational modes in response to an occurrence of a time event, a signal event, or a condition or conditional event. Moreover, the switch can occur automatically or based on a rule of operation, a signal change, feedback, a signal analysis result, a signal exceeding or meeting a predefined threshold, or an operational state. To name a few more examples, a mode change can occur on a recurring time basis or at a designated time or time interval.
In one exemplary embodiment, a transition between control modes can occur in response to a change in the strength of a reception signal. For example, a mode change can automatically occur when the number of reception “bars” on a cellular telephone reach a threshold level. In one exemplary embodiment, a transition can occur in response to a change in a data rate or a bit rate, for example.
Referring now to
The circuit 1300 comprises a power detector 1320 that can be an RMS detector or a peak power detector, for example. The power detector 1320 is followed by a switch 1330 that selects one of at least two sample-and-hold circuits 1340A, 1340B. The sample-and-hold circuits 1340A, 1340B feed a comparator or multiple comparators 1350. The outputs of the comparator 1350 goes to the control and timing circuit 1360. The control and timing circuit 1360 provides timing to the switch 1330, sample-and-hold circuits 1340, comparator(s) 1350, and other control circuits as needed. The control and timing circuit 1360 also controls the emulation channel 810 of the active wireless canceller. The emulation channel 810 acts upon a tap or sample of the aggressor signal 850 to attempt to mimic the aggressor signal that was coupled onto the victim signal as discussed above.
The interference compensation circuit 1300 can operate in two or more modes, one of which offers reduced power consumption relative to the other. In other words, in one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the circuit 1300 transitions to a power-saving mode upon occurrence of a trigger event. In that mode, power can be removed from one or more of the power detector 1320, the switching device 1330, the sample and hold circuits 1340A and 1340B, and the comparator 1350. The power detector 1320 and comparator 1350 are two leading contributors to power consumption, thus disconnecting their power supply can achieve significant power savings. The control and timing circuit 1360 typically comprises low-speed digital logic that consumes negligible power. Nonetheless, most of this circuit 1360 can be deactivated with the exception of the registers, which store the values of the emulation channel 810 parameters.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The system 1360 of
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In summary, a system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can comprise: a sensor that obtains a representative interference sample or a sample of an interfering signal; an emulation channel that processes the sampled interfering signal to generate an interference compensation signal; and a control loop for controlling the emulation channel. A system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can alternatively, or also, comprise a circuit that operates in two or more modes to cancel, correct, or compensate for interference imposed on one communication signal by another signal. The system can be applied to wireless communication devices, such as mobile phones, wireless base-stations, personal data assistants (PDAs), satellite or cable television components, computers, radar systems, wireless network elements, etc.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention is not limited to the described applications and that the embodiments discussed herein are illustrative and not restrictive. Furthermore, it should be understood that various other alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described here may be recognized by one skilled in the art upon review of this text and the appended figures. Such embodiments may be employed in practicing the invention. Thus, the scope of the present invention is intended to be limited only by the claims below.
This application claims the benefit of priority to and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 11/302,896, entitled “Method and System for Reducing Signal Interference, filed on Dec. 14, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,522,883 in the name of Gebara et al. U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 11/302,896 claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/635,817, entitled “Electromagnetic Interference Wireless Canceller,” filed on Dec. 14, 2004 in the name of Gebara et al. This application further claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/689,467, entitled “Automatic Gain and Phase Control for an Interference Cancellation Device,” filed on Jun. 10, 2005 in the name of Kim et al. This application further claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/696,905, entitled “Control Loop for Active Noise Canceller in Wireless Communication System,” filed on Jul. 6, 2005 in the name of Schmukler et al. This application further claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/719,055, entitled “Method and System for Embedded Detection of Electromagnetic Interference,” filed on Sep. 21, 2005 in the name of Stelliga et al. This application further claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/720,324, entitled “Method and System for Reducing Power Consumption in an Interference Cancellation Device of a Wireless System,” filed on Sep. 23, 2005 in the name of Stelliga et al. The entire contents of each of the above listed priority documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2632058 | Gray | Mar 1953 | A |
| 3445771 | Clapham et al. | May 1969 | A |
| 3571725 | Kaneko et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3599122 | Leuthoki | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3633108 | Kneuer | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3714437 | Kinsel | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3806915 | Higgins et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3977795 | Buschmann | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4201909 | Dogliotti et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4287756 | Gallagher | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4288872 | Tamburelli | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4349914 | Evans | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4363127 | Evans et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4386339 | Henry et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4387461 | Evans | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4393499 | Evans | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4410878 | Stach | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4464771 | Sorensen | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4470126 | Haque | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4475227 | Belfield | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4479266 | Eumurian et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4521883 | Roché | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4580263 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4584720 | Garrett | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4618941 | Linder et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4646173 | Kammeyer et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4651026 | Serfaty et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4688245 | Schenk | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4751497 | Torii | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4830493 | Giebeler | May 1989 | A |
| 4847521 | Huignard et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4864590 | Arnon et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4873700 | Wong | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4912726 | Iwamatsu et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4942593 | Whiteside et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4953041 | Huber | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4959535 | Garrett | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4978957 | Hotta et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5007106 | Kahn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5008957 | Klyono | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012475 | Campbell | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5067126 | Moore | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5072221 | Schmidt | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5111065 | Roberge | May 1992 | A |
| 5113278 | Degura et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5115450 | Arcuri | May 1992 | A |
| 5121411 | Fluharty | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5128790 | Heidemann et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5132639 | Blauvelt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5151698 | Pophillat | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5181034 | Takakura et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5181136 | Kavehrad et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5184131 | Ikeda | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5208833 | Erhart et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5222103 | Gross | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5223834 | Wang et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5225798 | Hunsinger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5237590 | Kazawa et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5243613 | Gysel et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5252930 | Blauvelt | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5282072 | Nazarathy et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5283679 | Wedding | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5291031 | MacDonald et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5293406 | Suzuki | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300930 | Burger et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5321543 | Huber | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5321710 | Cornish et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5327279 | Farina et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5343322 | Pirio et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5351148 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355240 | Prigent et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5361156 | Pidgeon | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371625 | Wedding et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5373384 | Hebert | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5376786 | MacDonald | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5382955 | Knierim | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387887 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5408485 | Ries | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5413047 | Evans et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416628 | Betti et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5418637 | Kuo | May 1995 | A |
| 5424680 | Nazarathy et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428643 | Razzell | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428831 | Monzello et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5436752 | Wedding | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5436756 | Knox et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5444864 | Smith | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450044 | Hulick | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5481389 | Pidgeon et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5481568 | Yada | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5483552 | Shimazaki et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5504633 | Van Den Enden | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510919 | Wedding | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5515196 | Kitajima et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5528710 | Burton et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5541955 | Jacobsmeyer | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5548253 | Durrant | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5557439 | Alexander et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5574743 | van der Poel et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5574978 | Talwar et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5589786 | Bella et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5604724 | Shiokawa | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5606734 | Bahu | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5612653 | Dodds et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617135 | Noda et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5621764 | Ushirokawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625360 | Garrity et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625722 | Froberg et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5644325 | King et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5648987 | Yang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5670871 | Man et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5675600 | Yamamoto | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5678198 | Lemson | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5689356 | Rainal | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5691978 | Kenworthy | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692011 | Nobakht et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5699022 | Tovar | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706008 | Huntley, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721315 | Evans et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5723176 | Keyworth et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751726 | Kim | May 1998 | A |
| 5754681 | Watanabe et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757763 | Green et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761243 | Russell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5764542 | Gaudette et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774505 | Baugh | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5783630 | Evans et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784032 | Johnston et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790595 | Benthin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5798854 | Blauvelt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801657 | Fowler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5802089 | Link | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812578 | Schemmann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825211 | Smith et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825257 | Klymyshyn et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825825 | Altmann et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828329 | Burns | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835848 | Bi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839105 | Ostendorf et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841841 | Dodds et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844436 | Altmann | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848139 | Grover | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850409 | Link | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850505 | Grover et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852389 | Kumar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859862 | Hikasa et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5861966 | Ortel | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5872468 | Dyke | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878390 | Kawai et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880870 | Sieben et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5883910 | Link | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887022 | Lee et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889759 | McGibney | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5896392 | Ono et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5912749 | Harstead et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920600 | Yamaoka et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923226 | Kakura et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942576 | Evans et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943380 | Marchesani et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943457 | Hayward et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949926 | Davies | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959032 | Evans et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959750 | Eskildsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965667 | Evans et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968198 | Hassan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978417 | Baker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5983178 | Naito et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985999 | Dominguez et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995565 | Tong et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999300 | Davies et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6002274 | Smith et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6002717 | Gaudet | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009424 | Lepage et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011952 | Dankberg et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021110 | McGibney | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028658 | Hamada et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031048 | Evans et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031866 | Oler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031874 | Chennakeshu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034996 | Herzberg | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6035080 | Henry et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041299 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052420 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6072364 | Jeckeln et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6072615 | Mamyshev | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078627 | Crayford | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084931 | Powell, II et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091782 | Harano | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093496 | Dominguez et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093773 | Evans et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6108474 | Eggleton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111477 | Klymyshyn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118563 | Boskovic et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6118567 | Alameh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6127480 | Dominguez et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140416 | Evans et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140858 | Dumont | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140972 | Johnston et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141127 | Boivin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141387 | Zhang | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6148428 | Welch et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151150 | Kikuchi | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154301 | Harvey | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163638 | Eggleton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169764 | Babanezhad | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6169912 | Zuckerman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181454 | Nagahori et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6191719 | Bult et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201916 | Eggleton et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208792 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211978 | Wojtunik | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212654 | Lou et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214914 | Evans et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6215812 | Young et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219633 | Lepage | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222861 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226112 | Denk et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236963 | Naito et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6259836 | Dodds | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6259847 | Lenz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268816 | Bult et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271690 | Hirano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6271944 | Schemmann et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281824 | Masuda | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285709 | Alelyunas et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288668 | Tsukamoto et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289055 | Knotz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289151 | Kazarinov et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295325 | Farrow et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6297678 | Gholami | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298459 | Tsukamoto | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304199 | Fang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311045 | Domokos | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6313713 | Ho et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314147 | Liang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6317247 | Yang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6317469 | Herbert | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6341023 | Puc | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6356374 | Farhan | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6388786 | Ono et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6411117 | Hatamian | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6421155 | Yano | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6445476 | Kahn et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6473131 | Neugebauer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6501792 | Webster | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6539204 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6560257 | DeSalvo et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6650189 | Romao | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6665348 | Feher | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665500 | Snawerdt | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6718138 | Sugawara | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6751587 | Thyssen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6816101 | Hietala et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6819166 | Choi et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6819943 | Dalal | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6920315 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6961019 | McConnell et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 7035361 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7050388 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7123676 | Gebara et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7149256 | Vrazel et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7173551 | Vrazel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7212580 | Hietala et | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7215721 | Hietala et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7307569 | Vrazel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 20010024542 | Aina et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020086640 | Belcher et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196508 | Wei et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002121 | Miyamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030007631 | Bolognesi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030008628 | Lindell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030030876 | Takei | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030053534 | Sivadas et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058976 | Ohta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030063354 | Davidson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067990 | Bryant | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040053578 | Grabon et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040105462 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114888 | Rich et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197103 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213354 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218756 | Tang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240678 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050069063 | Waltho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180520 | Kim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060146966 | Golanbari et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159002 | Kim et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178157 | Gebara et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291598 | Gebara et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070064923 | Schmukler et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070092265 | Vrazel et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171998 | Hietala et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253495 | Kim | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 527 966 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0 584 865 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 2 223 369 | Apr 1990 | GB |
| 2 306 066 | Apr 1997 | GB |
| 62082659 | Oct 1988 | JP |
| 1990000063162 | Nov 1991 | JP |
| 04187738 | Jul 1992 | JP |
| 08079186 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| WO 9945683 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 0141346 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 02067521 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 02082694 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02091600 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO 03071731 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03077423 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03092237 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004008782 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004045078 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004088857 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005018134 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005050896 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006065883 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070060059 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60635817 | Dec 2004 | US | |
| 60689467 | Jun 2005 | US | |
| 60696905 | Jul 2005 | US | |
| 60719055 | Sep 2005 | US | |
| 60720324 | Sep 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11302896 | Dec 2005 | US |
| Child | 11450543 | US |
