Method and system for colloid exchange therapy

Abstract
The present invention relates to a method and system for using a hemofilter to treat IMRD, hepatic failure, exogenous intoxication and other conditions associated with toxins in a patient's blood. One treatment includes the use of a very large pore hemofilter to remove target complex molecules and/or target molecules from a patient's blood and to infuse a replacement fluid into the patient's blood to maintain a prescribed albumin concentration in the patient's blood.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Discussed herein are three subjects. First, devices and procedures for the therapeutic manipulation of target receptor molecules, target complex molecules, and target molecules in immune mediator related disease, and hepatic failure, and exogenous intoxication. Second, selected physiologic roles of albumin in health, immune mediator related disease, hepatic failure and exogenous intoxication, in particular effects of oncotic pressure and binding of physiologic or pathologic molecules. Third, the physiologic roles of soluble receptor and carrier molecules with respect to pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators (“IM”) in particular and toxins in general.




Medical Blood Filtration




Treatment of certain diseases by filtration of blood is well established medical practice. Dialysis, using dialysis filters, which remove molecules with molecular weights up to 5,000 to 10,000 Dalton, is used to treat chronic and some acute renal failure. Conventional hemofiltration, discussed below, is used to treat acute renal failure, and in some cases, chronic renal failure. Plasmapheresis, using plasma filters or centrifuge techniques which remove molecules with molecular weights of 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 Dalton or more, is used to treat diseases associated with high molecular weight pathologic immunoglobulins or immune complexes, (e.g., multiple myeloma, lupus vasculitis, etc.).




Conventional hemofilters are well known medical devices commonly used to filter the blood of a patient with acute renal failure, and in some-cases, chronic renal failure. The hemofilter may be used either for convective or dialytic depuration of blood. Many hemofilters are on the market with various characteristics. However, conventionally they all share one major characteristic, which is a nominal or effective molecular weight cutoff of less than 69,000 Dalton—the molecular weight of albumin. Conventional hemofilters are generally designed to minimize or avoid sieving of albumin. The reason is that the removal of albumin in the application of renal failure treatment is of no benefit, and would be a deleterious side effect, because the oncotic pressure of plasma would be reduced and edema promoted. Albumin could be replaced, but would add cost and risk with no therapeutic benefit. Therefore, conventional hemofilters are designed to avoid sieving of albumin.




Plasmapheresis has the objective of sieving all plasma proteins, especially all classes of immunoglobulins and immune complexes. This requires a molecular weight cutoff of from 1 million to 5 million Dalton, or more. Plasmapheresis membranes are designed to reject only cellular elements of blood, and are the most extreme of the blood filtration techniques designed to produce an acellular filtrate.




Physiology of Albumin and Soluble Receptor and Carrier Molecules




Serum albumin serves a number of vital functions, two of these are its oncotic function and its chemical binding and transport of both physiologic and pathologic molecules. Albumin provides 80% of the oncotic pressure of plasma. This oncotic pressure keeps plasma water within the blood-vascular space, preserving the plasma water component of the blood volume, and preventing tissue edema by drawing tissue fluid back into the plasma from tissue. Albumin normally is present in human plasma at a concentration of about 3.5 to 5.0 gm/100 ml. If albumin concentration declines, typically to a concentration of <2.5 gm/100 ml, then oncotic pressure drops below its critical level, and edema fluid accumulates in tissues, body cavities (e.g., ascites, pleural effusion), and in air spaces in the lung (e.g., pulmonary edema). This accumulation of edema fluid may result in vital organ dysfunction, increased susceptibility to infection, and hyper-coagulable states.




Thus, depletion of albumin molecules to the extent that oncotic pressure is excessively reduced is to be avoided.




The chemical binding and transport functions of albumin are numerous. In most cases, potentially biologically active molecules in the blood circulation only have their biologic effects when they are free in suspension or solution in the plasma water. In this free state, the molecule is able to interact with its receptor(s) to bring about biologic effects. Such biologic actions may be agonistic or antagonistic. Binding of a potentially biologically active molecule to albumin or other carrier or soluble receptor molecule usually inactivates the molecule by preventing combination with its tissue receptor. In some instances, the binding functions are part of normal physiologic process. For example when albumin binds calcium or magnesium ions, it is a dynamic process that helps to preserve the proper concentration of ionized calcium in the plasma water. If ionized calcium drops, calcium is released from albumin to restore normal plasma water ionized calcium. In other instances, the binding function of albumin and other receptor molecules protects against disease causing molecules by participating in their inactivation and detoxification.




Another major function of albumin is its role in detoxification, in which it binds endogenous or exogenous toxins. In this role, albumin acts both to detoxify the toxin by binding and therefore inactivating it, and also as a carrier molecule, transporting the toxic molecule to the liver for chemical transformation (detoxification) and excretion, or to the kidney for excretion. Endogenous toxins arise from a great many pathologic bodily processes. During sepsis and septic shock, inflammatory mediators (“IM”) are produced in excess. At the site of local tissue injury or infection, IM serve the vital immune functions of removal and healing of injured or dead tissue, or resisting or destroying infecting organisms. When IM become excessive and spill over into the general circulation, they may become toxic to the body causing the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, with complicating multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and multiorgan system failure. These IM are carried in the plasma bound to albumin, bound to other receptor molecules, or free in plasma water. Binding by albumin and other receptor molecules moderates and ablates the effects of circulating IM. When the binding capacity is exceeded, the circulating IM become much more toxic and the moderating effects of albumin-carrier molecule binding are exceeded.




Other diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, pemphigoid vulgaris, multiple sclerosis, lupus, graft versus host disease and similar conditions, are similarly caused by excess circulating IM. These conditions generally result from an autoimmune process in which IM, either physiologic or pathologic, are dysfunctionally produced and are therefore toxic in any amount, or produced in dysfunctionally large and toxic quantities. Sepsis-septic shock and the autoimmune diseases, each resulting from dysfunctional and/or dysfunctionally abundant IM, may be referred to in aggregate as Inflammatory Mediator Related Disease (“IMRD”).




Liver failure is a complex disorder with an intricate pathophysiology and diverse effects on many vital organs. It is characterized by the accumulation in the body of many toxins that arise from body metabolic processes, which, under normal conditions, are quickly detoxified and eliminated by the liver, but which, in liver failure, accumulate in the body. The pathologic effects of liver failure are varied and include bleeding (failure of liver to produce clotting factors), infection (failure of liver to remove organisms translocated from the gut into the portal circulation), and the accumulation, as noted above, of various liver failure toxic substances which have been only partially characterized. The lethal effect of these liver failure toxic substances is hepatic coma with progressive cerebral edema and eventual brain stem herniation and death. Liver failure toxic substances are extensively bound by albumin. While several supportive therapies are in use to reduce these toxic substances and ameliorate the effects of hepatic failure, none have shown a clear or consistent benefit.




Exogenous toxin exposures such as suicide attempts, accidental toxin ingestions and environmental (industrial, agricultural, etc.) toxin exposures are of great diversity. The majority of these exogenous toxins are bound to albumin and other tissues, thus excretion by natural means (kidney elimination) or artificial means (dialysis) is severely limited. Therapy for nearly all these intoxications is supportive only. In most intoxications, which are mild or moderate, simple supportive care and allowing the body's own detoxification mechanisms time to work, is satisfactory. However, in severe intoxications, particularly with more dangerous chemicals (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, aspirin, etc) removal by some extracorporeal means would be desirable. However, current methods are not adequate to overcome binding of exogenous toxins to albumin or tissue and remove them from the body.




Not all carrier molecules inhibit the function of the bound molecule; in some cases, biologic activity of the bound molecule is enhanced by binding to a carrier molecule. For example, lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin) stimulation of cyotkine production is enhanced by low levels of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP). LBP is an acute phase carrier protein made by the liver.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with teachings of the present invention, a method and system for a new type of hemofiltration referred to as very large pore hemofiltration (“VLPH”) is provided. Very large pore hemofiltration includes sustained removal of albumin and similar large receptor molecules and carrier molecules for the purpose of removing both bound and unbound pathologic molecules or toxins. U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,418 teaches the use of a hemofilter with a nominal molecular weight cutoff of 100 to 150 kiloDalton (1,000 Daltons=1 kiloDalton) for the treatment of sepsis, septic shock, and other conditions. The purpose of the filter in the '418 patent is to remove circulating IM. A 100-kiloDalton hemofilter may initially sieve small amounts of albumin, but even if it does, albumin sieving quickly becomes negligible due to membrane polarization soon after the procedure begins.




Membrane polarization is well recognized in filtration process of blood and consists of the accumulation of a protein layer or “cake” on the membrane surface which characteristically reduces its sieving capacity (e.g., effective molecular weight cutoff) by 30 to 50%. The application of the 100 kD filter accepts the possibility of minor albumin sieving as a side effect of its therapeutic application. Therefore, a very large pore hemofiltration membrane suitable for the therapy of the present invention often requires a nominal molecular weight cutoff of >100 kD. Hemofilters with a nominal molecular weight cutoff ≦100 kiloDalton are generally not capable of sustained effective removal of albumin, and large receptor and carrier molecules, especially when target molecules are bound to them.




VLPH is distinct from plasmapheresis in the following critical ways. First, VLPH seeks sieving of proteins such as albumin, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 75 (molecular weight=75,000 Dalton), and similar soluble receptor and carrier molecules for the reasons stated above. VLPH specifically avoids removal of significant amounts of immunoglobulins and similar large molecules because removal of these molecules is associated with a marked increase in the risk of opportunistic infection.




Inflammatory mediator related disease (“IMRD”), liver failure, exogenous intoxication, and other conditions associated with toxins circulating in the blood are similar in that each is a severe pathologic process, often acutely life threatening, and in need of urgent or emergent therapy. Therefore, VLPH should generally be most effective when initial high volumes of ultrafiltrate are removed (exchanged for replacement fluid) for limited periods of time. Thus, the present invention will often be most effective at initial adult patient ultrafiltration rates of from 2-5 liters/hour, or even up to 15 to 20 liters/hour or more, and for initial treatment times ranging from about 4-10 hours, but generally not more than 24 hours at a time. Conventional hemofiltration produces ultrafiltration rates of about 1-2 liters/hour and is used on a continuous basis over a few to several days.




Devices and procedures, incorporating teachings of the present invention, fulfill longstanding needs for an effective therapy to treat IMRD, liver failure, exogenous toxin exposure and other conditions associated with toxins in the blood by removing target molecules and target complex molecules from a patient's blood. Such devices and procedures may be generally described as plasma colloid exchange therapy (PCET).











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A more complete and thorough understanding of the present invention and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram showing one example of a very large pore hemofiltration system incorporating teachings of the present invention; and





FIG. 2

is a block diagram showing one example of a method for treating a wide variety of conditions associated with inflammatory mediators and bound or unbound toxins in a patient's blood in accordance with teachings of the present invention using a hemofiltration system, replacement fluid for ultrafiltrate discarded from the hemofiltration system and an optional ultrafiltrate recycling device.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Preferred embodiments of the invention and its advantages are best understood by reference to

FIGS. 1 and 2

.




For purposes of this patent application, albumin, receptor molecules, and carrier molecules will be referred to collectively as “target receptor molecules”. A wide variety of naturally occurring receptor molecules and carrier molecules may be satisfactorily used with this invention. Also, receptor molecules and carrier molecules may be designed and artificially created to bind with specific target molecules or general classes of target molecules. The term “clean target receptor molecule” refers to a receptor molecule or a carrier molecule which is not contaminated with or bound with a target molecule. The term “clean albumin” refers to albumin which is not contaminated with or bound with a target molecule.




For purposes of this patent application, albumin with bound IM and/or toxins, receptor molecules with bound IM and/or toxin, and carrier molecules with bound IM and/or toxin, will be referred to collectively as “target complex molecules”. For purposes of this patent application, unbound IM, and unbound toxin (whether endogenous or exogenous) will be referred to collectively as “target molecules.” Endogenous toxins include but are not limited to IM, liver failure related toxins, and metabolites of certain exogenous toxins. Exogenous toxins include chemicals such as medicine taken in excess, industrial and/or agricultural chemical exposures, and the like.




Various embodiments of the present invention include a process, method, and system to treat IMRD, to treat hepatic failure and coma, to treat exogenous intoxication, and/or to treat other conditions associated with bound and unbound toxins in a patient's blood including target molecules and target complex molecules.




One example of a very large pore hemofiltration (VLPH) system incorporating teachings of the present invention is shown in FIG.


1


. System


90


may be used to treat mammals such as patient


100


. System


90


may include a very large pore hemofilter


102


, blood lines


101


,


103


,


105


,


107


and ultrafiltrate lines


112


,


127


and


121


, source


150


of replacement fluid and optional ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


. System


90


represents only one example of an extracorporeal blood circuit which may be used to treat patients in accordance with teachings of the present invention. For example, ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


may not be included in some systems used to treat a patient using hemofilter


102


. For other systems, ultrafiltrate may flow directly from hemofilter


102


to waste reservoir


119


.




Very large pore hemofilter


102


receives a stream of blood from patient or mammal


100


and removes ultrafiltrate from the stream of blood and thereby creates a stream of filtered blood and a stream of ultrafiltrate flowing through tubing


112


. The filtered blood is preferably returned to patient


100


. All or portions of the ultrafiltrate may be discarded to waste reservoir


119


. Alternatively, all or portions of the ultrafiltrate may be cleaned and returned to patient


100


.




Very large pore hemofilter


102


preferably sieves the ultrafiltrate from the blood stream. The ultrafiltrate will typically include a fraction of plasma water, electrolytes, peptides, proteins, target receptor molecules, target complex molecules, and target molecules. The sieved target molecules, target receptor molecules, and target complex molecules generally have a molecular size smaller than the nominal or effective pore size of the VLPH membrane (not expressly shown).




Very large pore hemofilter


102


is preferably formed from one or more biocompatible materials. In particular, very large pore hemofilter


102


may include a membrane disposed within case


102




a


. The membrane may be formed from the group of biocompatible materials (e.g., polysulfone, polyacrylonitrile, polymethylmethacrylate, polyvinyl-alcohol, polyamide, polycarbonate, etc.) and biocompatible cellulose derivatives. The case may be formed from polycarbonate or some other suitable biocompatible material. The VLPH membrane will generally remove albumin from the patient's blood. Depletion of albumin below acceptable levels will occur unless plasma colloid replacement fluid (described below) is provided in accordance with teachings of the present invention.




Various types of membranes may be used. Examples of such membranes include either a parallel plate or hollow fiber format. The membrane material may be any biocompatible material, typically polysulfone, polyacrylonitrile, polymethylmethacrylate, polyvinyl-alcohol, polyamide, polycarbonate, cellulose derivatives, and the like. The effective molecular weight cutoff will allow for effective sieving of target receptor molecules, target complex molecules, and target molecules, even after the membrane has undergone membrane polarization. The purpose of the membrane is to efficiently remove target receptor molecules, target complex molecules, and target molecules, as well as associated plasma water and associated solutes. The size and other sieving characteristics of albumin or other target receptor molecules may change when bound with various target molecules.




For the embodiment represented by system


90


, first tubing


101


interfaces with patient


100


and blood pump


104


. Blood pump


104


controls the flow of blood from patient


100


. Blood exits from blood pump


104


through second tubing


103


and flows to hemofilter


102


. Hemofilter


102


further interfaces with third tubing


105


and ultrafiltrate tubing


112


. Filtered blood exiting hemofilter


102


through third tubing


105


flows to three-way joint


125


and fourth tubing


107


where it returns to patient


100


.




Ultrafiltrate removed from the blood stream supplied by blood pump


104


to hemofilter


102


may flow through ultrafiltrate tubing


112


to three-way joint or three way valve


110


where the ultrafiltrate stream is discarded. Ultrafiltrate entering three-way joint


110


may be discarded through ultrafiltrate tubing


127


, ultrafiltrate pump


106




b


, and discard ultrafiltrate tubing


121


to waste reservoir


119


.




For some applications, ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


may be coupled with ultrafiltrate tubing


112


by tubing


172


and tubing


174


. Ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


may include an adsorptive filter or other device operable to form clean ultrafiltrate by removing target molecules and target complex molecules from the ultrafiltrate. Control valve


176


may be disposed in ultrafiltrate tubing


112


between the respective junctions with tubing


172


and tubing


174


. One or more control valves


178


and


180


may also be disposed in tubings


172


and


174


between ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


and ultrafiltrate tubing


112


. For some treatment therapies, control valve


176


may be opened and control valves


178


and/or


180


closed so that all of the ultrafiltrate stream will flow from hemofilter


102


through tubing


112


to three-way joint


110


to waste reservoir


119


. For other treatment therapies, control valve


176


may be closed and control valves


178


and


180


opened to direct the ultrafiltrate stream from hemofilter


102


through ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


.




All or a selected portion of clean ultrafiltrate from ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


entering three-way joint


110


may be directed to ultrafiltrate return pump


106




a


and return ultrafiltrate tubing


129


. The clean ultrafiltrate may flow through three-way joint


125


and tubing


107


to patient


100


along with the filtered blood stream. All or selected portions of clean ultrafiltrate may be directed from three-way joint


110


to waste reservoir


119


.




The rate of blood flowing through blood pump


104


and the total amount of blood circulated through hemofilter


102


will depend on the condition of patient


100


, the molecular weight cutoff of the associated hemofilter membrane, the body size of patient


100


, and other requirements for effective treatment of the patient. The amount of blood, the blood flow rate and the duration of treatment are preferably determined on a case by case basis after factoring the weight, the age and the nature and severity of illness of patient


100


. Often, blood flow rates may range from one hundred to two hundred milliliters/minute. Typically, total ultrafiltrate flow rate may range between one to nine liters per hour of which from zero to nine liters per hour may be discarded. The discard rate will be determined by the fluid balance requirements of patient


100


and the need for fluid removal. All clean ultrafiltrate not discarded may be returned to patient


100


. The use of replacement fluid will be discussed later in more detail.




The composition of the material making up the blood pump, ultrafiltrate pumps, replacement fluid reservoir, tubing, ultrafiltrate tubing and ultrafiltrate recycling device is preferably a biocompatible material, such as polyvinylchloride, but not limited to this material. The tubing may be flexible and have dimensions complementary with associated hemofilter connections, ultrafiltrate recycling device connections, replacement fluid reservoir connection, joints, stop cocks, or pump heads.




Ultrafiltrate waste pump


106




b


may be used to pump a portion or all of the ultrafiltrate to waste reservoir


119


. Ultrafiltrate return pump


106




a


may be used to pump a portion or all of the recycled or clean ultrafiltrate back to patient


100


. Ultrafiltrate return pump


106




a


may also be used to infuse replacement fluid into patient


100


. Tubing


107


transfers filtered blood along with replacement fluid and/or recycled ultrafiltrate or clean ultrafiltrate (if recycling is being done) to patient


100


. Tubing


129


transfers recycled or clean ultrafiltrate and replacement fluid from the ultrafiltrate return pump


106




a


. The various pumps are all optional so long as sufficient blood circuit pressure and flow are provided. Use of ultrafiltrate recycling device


170


, and apportionment of ultrafiltrate to recycling and return to patient


100


or to waste reservoir


119


is operator dependent.




Examples of Very Large Pore Hemofiltration and Plasma Colloid Exchange Therapy




For use in IMRD, liver failure, exogenous intoxications and other conditions associated with toxins in the blood, the present invention teaches a very large pore hemofilter with a membrane capable of sieving a significant amount of target molecules, target receptor molecules, and target complex molecules over a significant portion of the therapy time. The very large pore hemofilter will typically have a sieving capacity sufficient to provide for an appropriately rapid exchange of target complex molecules that are circulating in plasma, and removing target molecules located in tissues.




Now referring to

FIG. 2

, a flow diagram showing one method for determining hemofiltration treatment dosage according to teachings of the present invention is provided. The treatment method includes determining the medical condition of patient


100


at step


202


and molecular weight cutoff for hemofilter


102


at step


204


. In one embodiment, a hemofilter may be used based on the nominal molecular weight cutoff, or another specific expression of the molecules that are sievable by the associated membrane. A hemofilter may also be selected based on membrane surface area and membrane material.




The method further includes determining patient


100


's body size


206


. Determining body size may include measuring the body surface area, weight, mass, or lean body mass of patient


100


. Alternatively, measuring body size may include using other unambiguous, commonly used measure to account for patient


100


's body size. The ultrafiltrate dosage is then calculated using subject body size and the hemofilter molecular weight cutoff. In one embodiment the dosage will stipulate filter blood flow/unit body size/unit time. Body size may be stated as surface area, body weight, body mass, lean body mass or any other unambiguous measure. Time may be measured in minutes, hours, or another suitable measure.




The dose of ultrafiltrate volume remove from patient


100


may be indexed to body size and time. Specifically, the volume of ultrafiltrate per unit of body size per unit time may be determined. Volume of ultrafiltrate may be stated in liters, milliliters, or another suitable volume measure. Body size may be stated in kilograms, square meters of body surface area, kilograms of lean body mass or another suitable measure.




Blood is then withdrawn at step


210


from patient


100


according to the expected rate of removal of ultrafiltrate from the blood stream and the selected dosage of ultrafiltrate removal and pumped to hemofilter


102


at step


212


. Ultrafiltration of the blood using hemofilter


102


occurs at step


214


. Filtered blood is preferably returned to patient


100


at step


216


. Often treatment will be accomplished by continuous flow of blood, filtered blood and ultrafiltrate. However, periodic or intermittent hemofiltration may also be conducted in accordance with teachings of the present invention depending upon the patient's condition.




Fluid sieved from the blood by hemofilter


102


then enters an ultrafiltrate stream at step


218


. The ultrafiltrate stream removed by hemofilter


102


may be measured to ensure that the selected dosage of ultrafiltrate is removed. If the volume of the blood entering the hemofilter is not in accord with the selected dosage of ultrafiltrate removal, the volume of blood removed and pumped to the hemofilter


102


may be selectively increased or decreased to produce the selected dosage of ultrafiltrate removal. All or a selected portion of the ultrafiltrate may be directed into the waste stream at step


220


, where it is ultimately discarded at step


222


.




Optional step


270


may also be included to recycle or clean the ultrafiltrate. Replacement fluid may be added at step


272


to the cleaned or recycled ultrafiltrate. The clean ultrafiltrate may be returned to the ultrafiltrate stream at step


224


or may be discarded at step


220


.




The result of dose quantification and selection will be to assure equally intense hemofiltration-ultrafiltration treatment is provided to each subject receiving any given dose, regardless of body size. Dose will allow comparison of therapeutic regimens, duration, and hemofilters with respect to effectiveness, side effects, and costs.




Removal or exchange of target molecules, target receptor molecules, and target complex molecules depends on a number of variables. These variables include duration of therapy, membrane sieving coefficients for target molecules, target receptor molecules, and target complex molecules, and filter blood and ultrafiltrate flow rates, among others. Short duration (but intense) therapy can rapidly remove target molecules, target receptor molecules, and target complex molecules from plasma, but may leave insufficient time for target molecules, target receptor molecules, and target complex molecules to move from tissue sites into plasma, thus limiting the total body reduction of target molecules. Longer treatment times will allow for movement of target molecules from tissues, but, if sieving coefficient is excessively high, then plasma colloid replacement fluid would not be efficiently used. Filter blood and ultrafiltrate flow will also materially affect efficiency of treatment. Appropriate treatment duration will depend on the nature of the pathophysiologic condition to be treated, its severity, and other relevant clinical factors as assessed by a physician. Thus, the combinations of treatment duration, sieving coefficient, and filter blood and ultrafiltrate flow will vary.




A sieving coefficient approaching (or even exceeding) 1.0 for target complex molecules (or other target molecules) may often provide the most efficient removal of target molecules, and in certain circumstances will be most desirable. Sieving coefficients for target complex molecules (and target molecules) above 0.5 will also be reasonably effective. Lower sieving coefficients (between about 0.05 and 0.5) may provide sufficiently effective sieving under certain treatment circumstances. Sieving coefficients that are too low either initially or after membrane polarization are considered inadequate for VLPH.




The sieving characteristics of membrane pores depends not only on the nominal pore size, but also on the physical, chemical, and electrical characteristics of the material from which it is made and the particular manufacturing technique used to produce the membrane. As a result, the sieving coefficient for albumin and other target receptor molecules, and target molecules, may vary among membranes with the same nominal pore size. However, the nominal molecular weight cutoff to provide adequate sieving of target receptor molecules, target complex molecules, and target molecules, is expected to be approximately 150,000 to 500,000 Dalton. Very large pore hemofilter


102


will typically have pores with a molecular weight cutoff substantially less than that of plasmapheresis filters, so that no significant amount of immunoglobulins and similar large molecules will be sieved from the blood.




A 150-500 kD very large pore hemofilter may be used to accomplish plasma colloid exchange therapy (PCET) in accordance with teachings of the present invention. The very large pore hemofilter may filter patient blood with post filter blood returning to patient


100


and ultrafiltrate containing plasma water, target complex molecules, target receptor molecules, and target molecules, discarded to waste reservoir


119


at step


222


. Alternatively, all or portions of the ultrafiltrate may be cleaned and recycled back to patient


100


at steps


270


,


224


and


226


. Sieving albumin and other target complex molecules, should have the intended effect of rapidly reducing target molecules, but will also rapidly deplete plasma albumin and other target receptor molecules. Therefore, an infusion into the patient of plasma colloid replacement fluid (see below) will be administered in sufficient quantity to accomplish two goals. First, to maintain a serum albumin sufficient to preserve adequate plasma oncotic pressure. Second, to provide fresh albumin and/or other target receptor molecules, with binding sites unoccupied by IM and/or toxins, which can attract target molecules from tissue spaces and tissue binding sites, and subsequently clear target molecules through the very large pore hemofilter.




The continuous exchange of fresh albumin and other target receptor molecules, with its broad distribution through the circulation, should allow intravascular binding kinetics favorable to the removal of target molecules from tissue sites. The dwell time of fresh albumin and/or other target receptor molecules in the body should allow saturation of the target receptor molecules, and make for efficient use of target receptor molecules. In this manner, removal of target molecules from blood and tissue can be accomplished in IMRD, liver failure, exogenous intoxication, and other conditions associated with toxins in the blood.




As with all hemofiltration procedures, a replacement fluid will be needed. Current replacement fluids are often crystalloid only, consisting of pharmaceutical grade, balanced salt solutions. The present invention teaches a plasma colloid replacement fluid (“PCRF”) which includes pharmaceutical grade balanced salt solution containing albumin and/or other target receptor molecules and/or other physiologic molecules in a sufficient concentration to adequately replenish ongoing losses. For example, the concentration of albumin could range from 0.5 gm/100 ml to 10.0 gm/100 ml and would be operator determined. The concentration of other target receptor molecules would be operator determined. Whether to include specific target receptor molecules, the selection and amounts of target receptor molecules, are operator dependent.




PCRF will be used as all or part of the replacement fluid in the plasma colloid exchange therapy. PCRF may be added to the blood circulation at any point, but preferably in the post dilution mode in the very large pore hemofilter circuit. For example see step


250


in FIG.


2


. The plasma colloid exchange therapy may be used in a single pass mode, with discard of filtrate, and infusion of PCRF. Alternatively, plasma colloid exchange therapy may be done in a filtrate recycling mode (See step


272


) with recycling of filtrate through a recycling system so that all or part of the ultrafiltrate may be returned to the mammal. PCRF may also be infused during the recycling.




For the embodiment of the present invention as shown in

FIG. 1

, system


90


includes replacement fluid source


150


. Plasma colloid replacement fluid may be supplied by replacement fluid source


150


. For the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, replacement fluid source


150


includes fluid reservoir


152


, tubing


154


and control valve


156


. Various types of intravenous bags or other containers may be used as reservoir


152


.




For this particular embodiment, tubing


154


is coupled with tubing


129


between ultrafiltrate pump


106




a


and three-way joint


110


. Reservoir


152


preferably includes at least one port which may be coupled with tubing


154


to supply PCRF from reservoir


152


to tubing


129


. Control valve


156


may be used to regulate the flow rate of PCRF in accordance with teachings of the present invention. Additional PCRF may also be added to reservoir


152


using this same port or another port (not expressly shown).




For some applications replacement fluid source


150


may be generally described as a replacement fluid kit. Multiple replacement fluid kits may be maintained in the vicinity of hemofilter


102


. For example, each replacement fluid kit may include a respective reservoir


152


filled with different types of PCRF. An appropriate connector (not expressly shown) may also be provided to allow quickly engaging and disengaging reservoir


152


with tubing


154


. For other applications, tubing


154


may be provided as part of each replacement fluid kit. An appropriate connection (not expressly shown) may be provided to couple tubing


154


with tubing


129


or with other portions of the extra corporeal blood circuit associated with hemofilter


102


.




Although the present invention has been described with respect to a specific preferred embodiment thereof, various changes and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art and it is intended that the present invention encompass such changes and modifications fall within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for removing target molecules and target complex molecules from a patient's blood, comprising:circulating a stream of the patient's blood through a very large pore hemofilter having a nominal molecular weight cutoff greater than approximately 150,000 Daltons to sieve target molecules and target complex molecules from the blood stream and the nominal molecular weight cutoff less than approximately 1,000,000 Daltons to avoid removal of significant amounts of immunoglobulins to prevent increasing the risk of opportunistic infection; removing an ultrafiltrate containing the target molecules and target complex molecules from the blood stream using the hemofilter; replacing the ultrafiltrate removed from the blood stream with a replacement fluid having clean target receptor molecules; providing sufficient clean albumin to maintain adequate plasma oncotic pressure; and providing the clean albumin and clean target receptor molecules to attract additional inflammatory mediators and toxins from tissue spaces and tissue binding sites in a patient.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising infusion of the replacement fluid directly into the patient.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising infusion of the replacement fluid into a blood flow circuit associated with the hemofilter.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising infusion of the replacement fluid directly into the patient and into a blood flow circuit associated with the hemofilter.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein target molecules comprise toxins unbound and bound to albumin in the blood.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 where target molecules comprise tumor necrosis factor in the blood.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein target complex molecules comprise receptor and carrier molecules in the blood.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein target complex molecules comprise immune complexes in the blood.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of previously filed provisional application Ser. No. 60/204,398, filed on May 16, 2000 and provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/230,106, filed on Sep. 5, 2000, both provisional applications having the title of METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COLLOID EXCHANGE THERAPY. The present invention relates generally to systems, methods, and devices used for hemofiltration. More specifically, the present invention relates to very large pore hemofiltration (“VLPH”) for treating liver failure, for treating exogenous toxin exposures, and for treating inflammatory mediator-related diseases (“IMRD”) including sepsis and septic shock, which include systemic inflammatory response syndrome (“SIRS”), multiorgan system dysfunction syndrome (“MODS”), multiorgan system failure (“MOSF”),and compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (“CARS”), and for treating other conditions associated with toxin circulating in a patient's blood.

US Referenced Citations (40)
Number Name Date Kind
2682268 Ryan et al. Jun 1954 A
4000072 Sato et al. Dec 1976 A
4172071 De Maeyer et al. Oct 1979 A
4248736 Fuchigami et al. Feb 1981 A
4313831 Lehmann et al. Feb 1982 A
4362155 Skurkovich Dec 1982 A
4402940 Nose et al. Sep 1983 A
4581141 Ash Apr 1986 A
4614513 Bensinger Sep 1986 A
4618343 Polaschegg Oct 1986 A
4787974 Ambrus et al. Nov 1988 A
4844810 Richalley et al. Jul 1989 A
4872983 Dimantoglou et al. Oct 1989 A
4874522 Okamoto et al. Oct 1989 A
4897189 Greenwood et al. Jan 1990 A
4900720 Kotitschke Feb 1990 A
5211850 Shettigar et al. May 1993 A
5286449 Kuroda et al. Feb 1994 A
5450516 Pasquali et al. Sep 1995 A
5523096 Okarma et al. Jun 1996 A
5536412 Ash Jul 1996 A
5571418 Lee et al. Nov 1996 A
5683584 Wenthold et al. Nov 1997 A
5744042 Stange et al. Apr 1998 A
5762798 Wenthold et al. Jun 1998 A
5851394 Shibata et al. Dec 1998 A
5855782 Falkenhagen et al. Jan 1999 A
5858238 McRea et al. Jan 1999 A
5919369 Ash Jul 1999 A
5919444 Norman, Jr. Jul 1999 A
5931802 Yoshida et al. Aug 1999 A
5945337 Brown Aug 1999 A
6008199 Grinnell et al. Dec 1999 A
6022477 Luo et al. Feb 2000 A
6039946 Strahilevitz Mar 2000 A
6042784 Wamsiedler et al. Mar 2000 A
6156734 Grinnell et al. Dec 2000 A
6193681 Davidner et al. Feb 2001 B1
6287516 Matson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6497675 Davankov Dec 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0 098 392 Jun 1983 EP
0 787 500 Aug 1997 EP
9504559 Feb 1995 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
International Search Report PCT/US02/23603 5 pages, Mailed Apr. 15, 2003.
Konstantin et al. “Artificial Liver” from. Artificial Organs vol. 16 Issue pp. 235-242 Blackwell Publications Inc. Boston MA 1992 International Society for Artificial Organs, 1992.
“Hemodiafiltration in Two Chambers Without Replacement Fluid: A Clinical Study” by C. Sanz-Moreno and J. Botella Artificial Organs vol. 19 No. 5 1995.
International Search Report for PCT/US/99/15426, Jan. 20, 2000.
Seiichi Mochzuki et al.'s, “Dextran transport through asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes; Comparison with hydrodynamic models”, Journal of Membrane Science, 68 (1992) pp. 21-41.
PCT Search Report from PCT/US03/07784, Mailed Jul. 17, 2003.
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60/230106 Sep 2000 US
60/204398 May 2000 US