The present invention relates to techniques for printing digital images and, more particularly, to techniques for communicating between a remote printer having communication capabilities and a server.
The Internet, and in particular the World Wide Web (the “Web”), is increasingly being used to store and exchange information and to perform commercial transactions. Although the Web was originally only capable of storing and displaying textual information, the Web may now be used to store, display, and exchange a wide variety of textual, graphical, and audiovisual information such as digital images and full-motion video.
Digital photography, for example, is becoming increasingly popular, spurred in large part by the advent of low-cost, high-quality digital cameras. An increasing number of web sites allow users to upload digital photographs and other digital images to the Web, whereby such images may subsequently be viewed, shared, edited, and printed on conventional printers using computers connected to the Web using conventional Internet connections.
To print a digital image from the Web, a user must typically use a conventional desktop or laptop computer to establish a Web connection using a conventional modem or other network connection device. The user must then locate the digital image (such as a digital photograph) to be printed or complete a transaction that produces an image (such as a ticket) to be printed. The user must then typically download the located image from the Web site to the computer. To print the image, the user must typically issue a “print” command to the Web browser or other software executing on the computer.
Such a process can be cumbersome for the user and may restrict the range of circumstances in which the user may print digital images from the Web. For example, the conventional method described above involves several discrete steps, each of which must be initiated by the user: locating the desired image, downloading the image to a host computer, and issuing a print command to print the image.
Locating the desired image may be difficult if the user does not know or remember the precise Web address of the image to be printed. Even if the user does remember, for example the address of the home page of the Web site on which the image is stored, it may be necessary for the user to perform several steps to navigate a Web browser to the precise image to be downloaded.
If the image to be printed cannot be printed directly from the Web page on which it is stored, it may be necessary for the user to download the image to the host computer. This may require the user to perform several steps, such as selecting the image, providing a filename for the image, and selecting a location on a local storage device (such as a hard disk drive) on which the image is to be stored.
Printing the image may also be problematic. For example, if the image has been downloaded to a local storage device, the user may have to locate the image on the storage device and open the image file using imaging software before issuing a print command. The print command may fail for a variety of reasons, such as a faulty connection between the host computer and the printer or the absence of an appropriate printer driver on the host computer. After printing the image, the user typically must manually delete the downloaded image file from the local storage device.
In particular, it may be difficult and/or time consuming for a user to print images that are generated as a result of a non-Web transaction. Consider, for example, a user who purchases a ticket (such as a concert ticket or airline ticket) over the telephone. If such a transaction generates a ticket that is accessible over the Web for printing, the conventional system described above would require the user to connect the host computer to the Web, locate the image of the ticket using a Web browser, and print the image. Such a process requires the user to engage in a significant amount of post-transaction activity and may be particularly difficult for those users who have chosen to conduct the transaction (e.g., purchase the ticket) over the telephone because they are not familiar with using computers in general or the Web in particular. Users who are unable to print the resulting ticket may become dissatisfied with the associated service and fail to become repeat customers.
It should therefore be apparent that the process of printing images from the Web using a conventional computer connected to a conventional printer can be a tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone process.
Furthermore, the requirement that the printer be connected to a host computer has a variety of disadvantages. For example, a mobile computer user who desires the ability to print images from a variety of locations (such as at home and at the office) must have access to a Web-connected computer in each such location. Using the techniques described above, even a small mobile printer must be connected to a computer to print images from the Web. As a result, a user who wishes to print such remote images may be required to travel with both a printer and a laptop computer, or may be limited to printing images from locations at which a Web-connected desktop computer is available. The requirement that the printer be connected to a computer therefore limits the mobility of the user and limits the range of locations from which images may be remotely printed.
What is needed, therefore, are improved techniques for downloading and printing digital images.
In concurrently filed application Ser. No. 10/191,161, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing Output from Remotely Located Digital Files Using a Remote Printer (Attorney Docket No. 8531), techniques are disclosed for coupling a printer to a communications network (such as a Plain Old Telephone Service network or wireless voice or data networks), downloading printing information (such as a digital image) to the printer over the communications network, and using the printer to print output based on the printing information. The printer includes a network communications device, such as a modem, that enables the printer to connect directly to the communications network. The printing information may be downloaded to the printer in any of a variety of ways. For example, the printer may establish a connection to a printing server that serves the printing information. A connection between the printer and the printing server may be established, for example, by using the printer to place a telephone call to the printing server over a Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network. The printer may then download the printing information over the POTS network and print the image specified by the printing information.
Data communications over telephone and wireless connections can be unreliable. There is a need for a protocol for communicating between the printer and the printing server that ensures reliable communication and allows the transmission of information that restart at the point of interruption if interrupted.
It is an object of this invention to provide one embodiment of a protocol for communicating between the printer and the printing server that ensures reliable communication.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a protocol that allows the printing of documents with multiple pages and provides error checking.
It is also an object of this invention to provide a protocol that enables the communicating of the state of previous prints between the printer and the server and to provide secure access to this information.
The objects set forth above as well as further and other objects and advantages of the present invention are achieved by the embodiments of the invention described hereinbelow.
In order to enable downloading to a mobile printer data items from a server, a method comprising the steps of establishing communication connection end points (“sockets”), communicating with the server, where the communication includes sending a request for authentication to the server, receiving an authentication response, requesting print data portions from the server, receiving the requested print data portions, and notifying the server after each print data portion has been validated and printed is disclosed. The method also includes the step of terminating their communication connection when a printing session ends or if the time between commands received from the printer exceeds a constant timeout period or if an error occurs. In the authentication process, the server receives the characteristics of the mobile printer and the characteristics are compared to a database at the server thereby enabling the server to identify printing preferences. Knowledge of the printer characteristics and the printing preferences enables the preparing of documents to be printed at a specific mobile printer and the processing the documents to achieve optimum quality prints. If the printer is not registered (not found in the database), the remote printer will be registered automatically during authentication. In addition, as part of the authentication process, the printer transmits information to the server that allows the determining of print completion failures. Following this determination of print completion failures, the server can provide the mobile printer with the previously attempted print data and the printer can re-attempt printing. In the process of requesting print data portions from the server, the printer can request a partial print data portion. Requesting and receiving partial print data portions, renders the printer-server connection robust against noisy transmission and transmission interruption. Robustness against transmission errors is further enhanced by the use of security indicators. A security indicator is calculated at the server for each data portion and communicated to the remote printer along with the data portion. At the printer, the security indicator is calculated again and compared to the one received from the server. The security indicator can be a cyclic redundancy code (CRC), a digital signature such as that calculated by means of the MD5 message digest algorithm or just a known number (a so called Magic number) or a combination of the these. (A Magic number is a known, fixed number that is used to verify that the data stream is synchronized at the send/receive ends and that the data to follow is as expected.)
The above-described method constitutes a printer-server protocol and is implemented in a computer readable code. The computer readable code is embodied in a computer usable memory. Both the server and the printer include computer usable memories in which the computer readable code that implements the protocol is embodied.
The use of the printer server protocol of this invention obviates the need for a printer driver and enables the operation of the printer without a companion computer. Thus, the remote printer with communication capabilities can be connected to a network, and connected through the network to the server. The printer can be used anywhere, can be connected to a wireless phone or to a telephone network (POTS network) and data downloaded and printed.
To enable the remote operation of the printer (without a companion computer), complete two-way communication between the printer and the server is needed. The invention disclosed herein enables complete two-way communication between output devices and servers and supports the ability to continue transmission of data if the transmission was previously interrupted.
Although the printer is described herein as a device for printing images, it should be appreciated that more generally the term “printer” is used herein to refer to any device for receiving input and producing hard or soft copy output. Such input/output may include not only static images but also an audiovisual stream (which may include an audio stream, a video stream, or any combination thereof). It should therefore be appreciated that the term “image” (when referring, for example, to stored images and a printed image) may refer not only to a static image, but to any of the kinds of information that the printer may receive and output. The printer may, for example, be a CD drive (such as a CD-ROM, CD-R, or CD-RW drive), DVD player, or MP3 player that includes a network communications device and performs the other functions of the printer that are described herein.
For a better understanding of the present invention, together with other and further objects thereof, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and detailed description and its scope will be pointed out in the appended claims.
Data received at server 10, as shown in
A method that enables downloading, to the printer 30, data items from the server 10 is shown in
It should be apparent that a printing session can involve printing multiple documents.
For simplicity,
Authentication (steps 60 and 70,
Requesting (step 80,
If the printer determines there was a failure, the connection is terminated (step 110,
The print data portions downloaded from the server 10 can be compressed data or not compressed data. If they are compressed as downloaded, the print data portions must be uncompressed at the printer 30 before printing. Compression schemes used can be lossless such as arithmetic coding, Huffman coding or other forms of entropy coding, or lossy, such as transform coding (DCT, wavelet, for example). Compression schemes used can be standard, such as JPEG, or can be tailored to the application.
Additional verification of correct transmission is obtained by means of security indicators that are transmitted along with the data. Referring to
When a CRC or a digital signature such as that calculated by means of the MD5 message digest algorithm is used as a security indicator, and the response from the server 10 initiates the transfer of a new print data portion to the printer 30, if the header data returned is error-free, then the CRC value or a digital signature such as that calculated by means of the MD5 message digest algorithm returned from the server 10 should be saved. (As used hereinafter, CRC refers to CRC or a digital signature such as that calculated by means of the MD5 message digest algorithm.) This value represents the CRC of the entire print data portion. If errors then occur in transmission of the print data portion so that only partial data is received, this CRC is to be saved until the entire print data portion has been sent to the printer 30. This may require more than one call to the server 10. After the entire print data portion is received, the CRC value of the print data portion should be computed at the printer and compared to the saved CRC. If they differ, the print data portion must be discarded and the process repeated from the beginning. If the print data portion is being requested with offset greater than zero, then the CRC returned from the server only corresponds to the portion of the print data portion from the offset to the end of the print data portion.
A method for enabling the server 10 to provide data items to the printer 30 is shown in
The authentication process at the server 10 (step 535,
The response to a request from the printer 30 for print data portions to be downloaded (step 550,
Whether a partial data portion or an entire data portion is retrieved, the server 10 sends the partial data portion or the entire data portion to the printer 30 along with the identifying data for the document and identifying data for the print data portion, the security indicator of the data and the offset (step 795,
Compression schemes used can be standard, such as JPEG, or can be tailored to the application.
If a recoverable error occurs, the server 10 returns an error code to the printer 30 (step 795,
One embodiment of this invention, the printer 30 initiates a connection to the server 10 over a TCP/IP network. The connection is initiated via a telephone call. This requires the use of a serial line protocol such as Serial Line IP (SLIP) or Point to Point Protocol (PPP). After the printer makes the telephone call to the server and connects to the server 10, the printer 30 communicates to the server 10 through an API described here. These API calls communicate with the server through a socket interface over TCP/IP. The socket is open throughout a series of API calls during the time that the printer is communicating with the server over the telephone call.
The sequence of operations is as follows:
In this embodiment, the functions comprising the API functions are written in the C programming language, although it should be apparent that other programming languages could be used.
The principal API functions are described below.
API Functions
In the API functions to be described, the first word in the function name is the type of variable returned by the function. A void function does not return a variable. The output of the function is in one of the function arguments, which are typically an input structure and an output structure.
void openSocket
This function opens a socket connection to the server at a specific IP address or URL over a designated port. If phone is a non-null argument, the call will dial up the server. If the phone connection has already been made at the time of this call, phone should be set to null.
void closeSocket(int hangup)
Closes the socket. If hangup is non-zero the telephone connection is terminated.
Note that for these two functions a telephone call and hangup will normally occur,
Each of the following API calls gets a pointer to an input structure in which required fields are to be set before making the call and pointer to an output structure in which values are returned. (To avoid any confusion at the server, the structure should be completely zeroed out before setting the required values.) All the API calls must return even if communication with the server is interrupted. In that case, the computer language code implemented with the API call must be able to timeout and set a status code of TIMEOUT_ERROR into the returning server response argument status field.
Some API calls have an additional argument that is a pointer to a buffer. This is either a place to copy in bytes from the server or to copy out bytes to the server. The type of data being transferred is summarized in the following table.
The implementation of these functions will consist partially of code to read from an open socket or to write to the same socket. All functions operate as follows:
This function makes the initial call through the socket to the server and authenticate the printer.
For this call, as for others, fields in the returned server response structure that are not specified are to be ignored. Parameter cold is to be set to 1 if the printer was powered down and does not retain any previous image state information. This will cause the server to reset the “in-progress” flags of items to be downloaded to all equal false. In the case where the server has a partial download buffer from the previous connect or has not called the endOfPrint function for the last print, this call should be made with cold set to 0.
There are two possible states at the server:
In case 1) this call may return a status telling the printer to call a function out of the normal sequence. For example, diagnostic commands can be called to return data from the printer to the server or the printer can be directed to make a separate call download new printer parameters.
This call contacts the server and refreshes the still pending number of prints to download. It is possible that new content will have entered the user's server folder while the printer is connected and this call then allows the printer to keep current with the user's folder. The server will query the database each time this call is made.
This call is made to transfer all or part of the print data portion for the next or indicated print. Arguments next.docID and next.ID can both be set to zero or both to integers specifying the document ID and the print ID of the print data portion to be transferred. If both are zero, the server will transfer the next print data portion in the queue. (Note: Setting either next.ID or next.docID to zero, but not both is not allowed.)
This call supports the case where the printer may have previously downloaded part of a print data portion but then the connection between the printer and the server was broken. If transmission is broken, then the call is to set sizeReceived equal to the actual number of bytes read from the socket and out.status is to be reset to PARTIAL_DATA_SENT. If transmission is successful, the call is to set sizeReceived to equal print.size received from the server. If transmission is broken and the printer is not powered down, the printer knows the ID of the document and print and how much of the print data portion was transferred. The printer then makes this call by setting next.docID and next.ID to be the ID's of the interrupted print and an offset into the print data portion where the printer wants to resume the transfer. After a call to getNextPrint where not all print data portion bytes were received, the new print.offset for a subsequent call to getNextPrint should be the previous print.offset plus the returned value of sizeReceived.
Parameters last.docID and last.ID refer to the last print that was successfully transferred fully to the printer and that the printer still has the bitmap in memory. (Note: If the printer was powered down, this information will have been lost and both of these parameters must be set to zero.) If last.docID and Last.ID parameter are non-zero, the server determines if the print data portion to be downloaded represents the print right after print with ID equal to Last.ID within the same document specified by last.docID.
If offset is zero, then the call will allocate a buffer of size large enough to hold the print data and set buffer to point to this pointer. This will be the case if transmission of a picture is just beginning. If transmission had been interrupted and the printer wants to continue at some point in the byte stream, print.offset should be set to that offset and a pointer passed in pointing to the previously allocated buffer which will be of sufficient size to continue the download to the end of the print data portion.
CRC contains a CRC of the print data portion being transferred that was computed at the server. This CRC is of the portion of the print data portion being transmitted during the current call to the server. The printer function must compute a CRC of the received print data portion (consisting of a whole or portion of print data portion from offset to end) and compare to the transmitted CRC. If they differ, status must be reset to TRANSMISSION_ERROR and the function should return immediately.
This is an optional call that is used to improve the reliability of data transfer over slow connections. During the time that the printer is receiving a data portion from its input socket, the server has already written the entire data portion into its output socket and is waiting for another command from the printer. If the wait time exceeds a timeout period, the server must assume that there is a problem with the printer/server connection. In this case, the server closes the socket. To prevent this event from occurring in cases where the connection is slow, the printer can send a series of ping commands to the server. Each ping command received causes the server to reset a time variable to the current time. This variable is compared periodically to see if the timeout interval between commands from the printer has been exceeded. Hence, by sending ping commands, the printer informs the server that the connection is still open and functioning and that the server should not close the socket. This is shown in
This call is to be made after each print comes out of the printer. If the same print is directed to be printed multiple times, then this call is to be made multiple times, once for each physical print made. The server will update the database each time this call is made. The call to the server is timed to coincide with the actual physical printing so that the user cannot break the connection to the server after receiving the print but before endOfPrint is called and, henceforth, have the same content printed again.
Use of the API Functions
Printer Behavior
An embodiment of a sequence of API calls to be made by the printer and printer behavior, as a function of the values returned by making these calls, is shown in the following series of Figures.
For means of illustration, the following printer variables will be defined:
These variables are used to hold state during the time the printer is powered up. When the printer is powered down variables must be reset as follows:
LastDocID=0
LastID=0
nextDocID=0
nextID=0
offset=0
CRC=0
endPrintFailure=false
cold=1
The variables are to maintain their current values when the printer is both connected and disconnected from the server, as long as the printer is not powered down.
The diagram showing the overall flow of the printer is shown in
Server Behavior
To complete the description of the printer/server interface, an embodiment of the behavior of the server when responding to API commands sent by the printer has to be described.
Structures
In one embodiment, the first two structures are used to send/receive commands and parameters for many of the interactions between the printer and server through the socket connection. These structures are defined so that they will be a fixed, known length for all commands. This will allow the printer and server to read/write the structures as a single block of bytes of known size. It is assumed that sizeof(int) is 4 bytes integers have been used throughout. This is important since, in this embodiment, the server is implemented in the Java programming language and the Java code needs to read and write these data blocks correctly. Note that both structures begin with a fixed magic number that is known to both the printer and the server.
The following structure is used by the printer when sending commands to the server.
The following structure is used by the server to return status to the printer.
Security Enhancements
The following are two methods for enhancing the security and reliability of communications between the printer and the server.
In addition to these application-level security measures, there are measures that are provided by the software products that the printer and server are implemented with. The server can prevent denial of service attacks by setting a parameter that limits the size of a data block received at the server to a known, maximum size. Secondly, the printer will initially connect with a user name and password that is implemented below the application level software described herein. Third, serial line protocols used over modems such as PPP implement a Challenge Handshake protocol (CHAP), which is used to verify the identity of a client using a 3-way handshake scheme.
Printer and Server Implementations
The methods of this invention can be implemented by a printer system and a server system comprising means for implementing the functions described above. At least one processor and supporting memory at the printer and, similarly, at least one processor and supporting memory at the server can be used to implement the methods of this invention. Processors can be dedicated processors, or general purpose processors and supporting memory could be any computer accessible memory.
One additional advantage of the present invention is the reduction of loading of the memory at the server. For servers operating under TCP, when a connection closes, in order to block further connections, TIME_WAIT states are kept in the server memory (T. Faber, J. Touch, W. Yue, “The TIME_WAIT state in TCP and Its Effect on Busy Servers”, http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/infocomm99/infocomm99-web/). The present method reduces the memory loading by:
a) sending an endOfSession message to the server at the end of the printing session causing the server to close the socket at the server without responding to the printer, and,
b) closing the socket at the printer after sending the endOfSession message. This action eliminates the need for a server to maintain a TIME_WAIT state for each recently disconnected printer. This reduces server memory requirements and increases processing speed.
The complete two way communication between the printer and the server, which is described above, enables the remote operation of the printer (without a companion computer). The protocol disclosed above enables complete two-way communication between output devices and servers and ensures reliable communication by allowing the transmission of information to restart at the point of interruption, if interrupted.
In general, the techniques described above may be implemented, for example, in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. The techniques described above may be implemented in one or more computer programs executing on a programmable computer including a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including, for example, volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. Program code may be applied to data entered using the input device to perform the functions described and to generate output information. The output information may be applied to one or more output devices.
Although the above description refers to a specific embodiment, it should be apparent that other embodiments are within the scope of the invention. For example, rather than sending a notification to the server after every print, such notification could be sent after a number of prints. Other similar modifications are within the scope of the art.
Each computer program within the scope of the claims below may be implemented in any programming language, such as assembly language, machine language, a high-level procedural programming language, or an object-oriented programming language. The programming language may be a compiled or interpreted programming language.
Each computer program may be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied in a computer-accessible storage device for execution by a computer processor. Method steps of the invention may be performed by a computer processor executing a program tangibly embodied on a computer-readable medium to perform functions of the invention by operating on input and generating output.
Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CDROM, any other optical medium, punched cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read and/or write.
Elements and components described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions.
Although the invention has been described with respect to various embodiments, it should be realized this invention is also capable of a wide variety of further and other embodiments within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/191,606, filed Jul. 9, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,383,321, issued Jun. 3, 2008. This application is also related to the following commonly-owned patent applications, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. application Ser. No. 09/870,538, filed May 30, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Generating a Permanent Record of a Service Provided to a Mobile Device”; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/022,924, filed Dec. 18, 2001, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Printing Remote Images Using a Network-Enabled Printer”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,084, issued Dec. 15, 2005; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/024,068, filed Dec. 18, 2001, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing Output from Remotely Located Digital Files Using a Mobile Device and Output Device”, now abandoned and replaced by continuation application Ser. No. 11/150,948, filed Jun. 13, 2005; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/191,161, filed Jul. 9, 2002, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing Output from Remotely Located Digital Files Using a Remote Printer”, now abandoned; and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/191,892, filed Jul. 9, 2002, entitled “System for Remotely Rendering Content for Output by a Printer”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
661504 | Ehlman | Nov 1900 | A |
1251766 | Gindele | Jan 1918 | A |
1524508 | Cohen | Nov 1922 | A |
2590678 | Caim | Mar 1952 | A |
2854903 | Land et al. | Oct 1958 | A |
2930301 | Land et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3047387 | Land | Jul 1962 | A |
3079849 | Wareham | Mar 1963 | A |
3183809 | Nerwin | May 1965 | A |
3270653 | Bachelder | Sep 1966 | A |
3283683 | Land | Nov 1966 | A |
3314792 | Land | Apr 1967 | A |
3405619 | Land | Oct 1968 | A |
3455692 | Bachelder et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3631773 | Moodie | Jan 1972 | A |
3636845 | Harvey | Jan 1972 | A |
3643570 | Reid et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3673939 | Harvey | Jul 1972 | A |
3754917 | Harvey | Aug 1973 | A |
3767405 | Harvey | Oct 1973 | A |
3852781 | Erlichman | Dec 1974 | A |
3939781 | Adams | Feb 1976 | A |
4114166 | Driscoll et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4132471 | Svatek et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4172647 | Gold | Oct 1979 | A |
4200383 | Bendoni et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4212528 | Mason | Jul 1980 | A |
4248510 | Baker et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4291966 | Bendoni et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4370045 | Holmes | Jan 1983 | A |
4488794 | Dolgow et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4569578 | Stella et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4605608 | Bullitt | Aug 1986 | A |
4660951 | Reed et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4693576 | Chen | Sep 1987 | A |
4829524 | Yoshida | May 1989 | A |
4855769 | Slavitter et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4884088 | Mauchan | Nov 1989 | A |
4951073 | Slavitter | Aug 1990 | A |
4962398 | Sorg et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5001502 | Douglas | Mar 1991 | A |
5023636 | Douglas | Jun 1991 | A |
5040009 | Mizuno | Aug 1991 | A |
5049910 | Hsiung | Sep 1991 | A |
5073464 | Osawa et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5103249 | Keene | Apr 1992 | A |
5176224 | Spector | Jan 1993 | A |
5285894 | Kamata et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292612 | Polizzotto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5440366 | Reiss et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453804 | Norris et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5673190 | Kahleck et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694484 | Cottrell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757976 | Shu | May 1998 | A |
5768583 | Orzol et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787237 | Reilly | Jul 1998 | A |
5799219 | Moghadam et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806005 | Hull et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838999 | Norris | Nov 1998 | A |
5854882 | Wang | Dec 1998 | A |
5855007 | Jovicic et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859628 | Ross et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870633 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5894546 | Yoshida | Apr 1999 | A |
5973731 | Schwab | Oct 1999 | A |
5978559 | Quinion | Nov 1999 | A |
5991290 | Malik | Nov 1999 | A |
5995239 | Kagawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6032180 | Nishikawa | Feb 2000 | A |
6043898 | Jacobs | Mar 2000 | A |
6067532 | Gebb | May 2000 | A |
6072595 | Yoshiura et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076068 | DeLapa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6128415 | Hultgren, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134450 | Nordeman | Oct 2000 | A |
6166729 | Acosta et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167469 | Safai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6202096 | Williams et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215561 | Kakutani | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241673 | Williams | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275104 | Holter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298164 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314476 | Ohara | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351776 | O'Brien et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356356 | Miller, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381660 | Ito | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397261 | Eldridge et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453127 | Wood et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6473498 | Foth | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6526416 | Long | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553240 | Dervarics | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570640 | Garfinkle et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594032 | Hiroki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623527 | Hamzy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633635 | Kung et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636259 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657702 | Chui et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671063 | Iida | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674539 | Serra et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6715003 | Safai | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725051 | Fidler | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748569 | Brooke et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757900 | Burd et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785022 | Todaka | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785542 | Blight et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792577 | Kimoto | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795205 | Gacek | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795852 | Kleinrock et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804534 | Lai et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6823457 | Berstis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823526 | Howard et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831682 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847334 | Hayhurst et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856412 | Kaneko | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6892199 | Hong et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906810 | Senay et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6931432 | Yoshida | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931600 | Pittman | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938079 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6976084 | Pineau et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999111 | McIntyre et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006242 | Smith, II et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010695 | Mizuguchi | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039033 | Haller et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068846 | Yaguchi | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7092119 | Hinds et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103905 | Novak | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7142317 | Naito et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143141 | Morgan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7162691 | Chatterjee et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7206806 | Pineau | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210099 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7272390 | Adachi et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272788 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281034 | Eyal | Oct 2007 | B1 |
20010019964 | Shimizu | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010021664 | Kikinis | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024518 | Yaguchi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010042010 | Hassell | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052942 | MacCollum et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054066 | Spitzer | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020040332 | Maari et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042884 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049837 | Kato | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051197 | Minegishi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054345 | Tomida et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020060808 | Henderson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062397 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062406 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065101 | Picoult et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065873 | Ishizuka | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075510 | Martinez | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077974 | Ortiz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078160 | Kemp et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078343 | Rubin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078352 | Angwin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091527 | Shiau | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091738 | Rohrabaugh et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100802 | Sehr | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104099 | Novak | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113994 | Smith et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124059 | Takahashi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161856 | Pineau et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169002 | Imbrie et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169851 | Weathersby et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171857 | Hisatomi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174205 | Nakashima | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181010 | Pineau | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020181023 | Gorian et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184302 | Prueitt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184307 | Pineau | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184318 | Pineau | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184378 | Pineau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186404 | Gragg | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188673 | Gimson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002072 | Berkema et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004859 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005050 | Pineau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037076 | Bravery et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038963 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046268 | Hirabayashi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069780 | Hailwood et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081788 | Simpson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084016 | Norgaard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090707 | Simpson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093756 | Behzadi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105887 | Cox et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030107529 | Hayhurst et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115250 | Bernier et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140095 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149573 | Lynton | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184793 | Pineau | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040010540 | Puri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010567 | Moyer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019628 | Puri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040201613 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050010587 | Matsubayashi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024499 | Luciano et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050231761 | Pineau | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235202 | Chen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2657423 | Dec 1976 | DE |
0598513 | May 1994 | EP |
0738956 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 745 924 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 830 000 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0855835 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 862 104 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0872792 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0586903 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0930774 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1063597 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1075138 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1093288 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1100003 | May 2001 | EP |
1109113 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 117 271 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 132 839 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1176500 | Jan 2002 | EP |
2 775 406 | Feb 1998 | FR |
2287623 | Sep 1995 | GB |
2303478 | Feb 1997 | GB |
2347766 | Sep 2000 | GB |
63103220 | May 1988 | JP |
6486660 | Mar 1989 | JP |
1200865 | Aug 1989 | JP |
5244629 | Sep 1993 | JP |
10-069553 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10191453 | Jul 1998 | JP |
1166823 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-313107 | Nov 1999 | JP |
200053276 | Feb 2000 | JP |
200066866 | Mar 2000 | JP |
200099079 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-207145 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000222160 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-312260 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000339237 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001 076058 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001 103233 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001 118010 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001 167024 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001207145 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001236183 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001 249899 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-256161 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001245028 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001 285418 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001313913 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001344435 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002 056023 | Feb 2002 | JP |
9613814 | May 1966 | WO |
9530199 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9530199 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9819478 | May 1998 | WO |
0001138 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0048384 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0072499 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0103040 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0113307 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0116853 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0116853 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0120509 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0150446 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0173644 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0195267 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0201451 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0208926 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0209435 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02089463 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02098107 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 02098124 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03052580 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03052581 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03067496 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03079279 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006085 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004006155 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004006543 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080278751 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10191606 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 12105710 | US |