Patent Grant
8635903
This disclosure relates generally to systems for compacting earth material. More specifically, a method and system is disclosed for compaction that more accurately determines the level of compaction using at least two different compaction measurement systems.
Construction projects such as road building projects require extensive and often costly procedures to ensure that the final product (e.g., road) meets requirements such as proper smoothness, elevation, load bearing capacity, etc. Often earth material at a worksite must be redistributed and one or more compactor machines employed to successively compact material until the desired level of compaction is achieved.
Worksites usually contain varying topology and soil composition. Moreover, different regions of a worksite might have varying compaction requirements. Systems to measure the state of compaction of a region of a worksite are known in the art. Despite the existence of automated or semi-automated methods of measuring the compaction state of a region of a worksite, there is a need for more accurate measurement methods. For example, different methods of measuring the compaction of a region have varying levels of accuracy at varying depths below the ground. Therefore, it is desirable for a system to optimally utilize data from multiple different compaction measurement systems, and to display the resulting data in a way that is meaningful for a machine operator and/or an automated compaction control system.
The present disclosure is directed to overcoming or mitigating one or more of the problems set forth above.
In one aspect, a method of compaction measurement including a step of determining data indicative of the compaction state of a first portion of a material region over a first depth range with a first compaction measurement system. A step of determining data indicative of the compaction state of a second portion of the material region over a second depth range with a second compaction measurement system, and wherein the second depth range is deeper than the first depth range, is also included. The method further includes a step of displaying data indicative of the compaction state of the first portion of the material region over a first display range. The method also includes a step of displaying data indicative of the compaction state of second portion of the material region over a second display range.
In another aspect, a system for measuring compaction, including a first compaction measurement system for determining the compaction state of a first portion of a material region over a first depth range. Also included is a second compaction measurement system for determining the compaction state of a second portion of the material region over a second depth range. Also included is at least one electronic control module operably connected to the first compaction measurement system and the second compaction measurement system. A display system operably connected to the electronic control module and configured to displaying data indicative of the compaction state of the first portion of the material region over a first display range and the compaction state of the second portion of the material region over a second display range is also included.
In another aspect, A machine including a compactor having a frame and a compacting element coupled with the frame. Also included is a first compaction measurement system for determining the compaction state of a first portion of a material region over a first depth range. Also included is a second compaction measurement system for determining the compaction state of a second portion of a material region over a second depth range. Also included is at least one electronic control module operably connected to the first compaction measurement system and the second compaction measurement system. Also included is a display system operably connected to the at least one electronic control module and configured to display output from the first compaction measurement system and the second compaction measurement system.
A communication device 20 may be mounted on compactor 10 for sending and/or receiving signals. Signals can relate to characteristics such as the position, operating mode, or other aspects of compactor 10. Communication device 20 may also receive signals relating to characteristics of the worksite, or control signals to operate compactor 10 within the work area. Communication device 20 may also be employed to send data from compactor 10 relating to a compaction state of a material region at a worksite, for example, the data generated by one or more compaction measurement systems on compactor 10, as discussed in more detail below.
Compactor 10 also includes an electronic control module 26 for receiving and sending signals relating to the operation and control of machine, as further described herein. For example, electronic control module 26 may receive signals from a first compaction measurement system 22 and a second compaction measurement system 24, as well as a sensor, via communication lines 28. Electronic control module 26 also optionally sends and receives signals related to other aspects of operation of the machine, such as signals to motors, pumps, or communications devices on compactor 10. Further, although electronic control module 26 is represented as a signal component on compactor 10 in
First compaction measurement system 22 may include one or more sensors or electronic equipment configured to gather data directly or indirectly indicative of a compaction response of a material region with which compactor 10 is interacting. For example, first compaction measurement system 22 may be configured to provide a signal indicative of the compaction state of a material region by measuring the rolling resistance of compactor 10 as it passes over a material region. Compaction measurement techniques by this method are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,188,942, incorporated herein by reference (“the '942 patent”). The '942 patent discloses a method and system of determining compaction performance of a material by calculating the compactive energy delivered to the material, for example, as a function of the known compaction width, the lift thickness of the material, and the rolling resistance of the compactor. Thus, first compaction measurement system 22 may comprise one or more sensors and electronic systems configured to provide a measurement of compaction performance from compactive energy calculations. As described in the '942 patent, sensors such as a ground speed sensor, inclinometer, and torque sensors may be utilized to determine compaction performance.
Compactor 10 is also equipped with a second compaction measurement system 24. Second compaction measurement system 24 may be one of the compaction measurement systems discussed above, or an alternate method for measuring compaction. For example, second compaction measurement system 24 may be composed of an accelerometer to measure movement of the drum of a compactor, such as drum 14 of compactor 10 in
Alternatively, first compaction system 22 or second compaction measurement system 24 may be other measurement device, such as a nuclear density gauge or a deflectometer. The present disclosure appropriately covers other known means of measuring compaction of a material beyond the exemplary methods discussed in detail herein.
Alternatively, however, the different compaction measurement systems may measure differing, but overlapping, depths of material region 204. Returning to
Alternatively, the electronic control module may average the data when one a plurality of compaction systems returns data at the same depth below ground. In another alternative, the electronic control module may compute a weighted average, weighting the data from one of the plurality of compaction measurement systems more heavily if, at that particular depth, there is reason to believe that one of the compaction measurement systems may provide more accurate data than another compaction measurement system.
Display screen 300 optionally shows compactor 10, including the present position of compactor 10, to orient the operator to the material region at the worksite being displayed. Display screen 300 also shows at least two different compaction depth regions, represented by depth region 304 and depth region 306. For each depth region displayed, a visual indication is provided to show the level of compaction of the depth region. For example, depth region 304 may be represented on display screen 300 in the color blue, with darker shades of blue indicating that the material in depth region 304 is more compacted, and lighter shades of blue indicating that the material in depth region 304 is less compacted. Depth region 306 may then be represented in the color red, with darker shades of red indicating that the material in depth region 306 is more compacted, and lighter shades of read indicating that the material in depth region 306 is less compacted. In this fashion, the operator can see the level of compaction at two different depth ranges on a single display screen, with data gathered from two different compaction measurement systems.
Variations of the display system above may also be used. For example, different shading or other graphics may be used in place of colors, both to show the level of compaction and to separate between two or more different depth regions. Different colors may also be used to signify compaction performance, such as green to indicate that a material region is sufficiently compacted, or red to indicate that a material region is not sufficiently compacted. Likewise, the colors or other graphics may indicate the quantitatively measured levels of compaction, or alternatively may indicate the relative level of compaction compared to a target level of compaction for the material region.
In addition, display screen 300 need not show two or more discrete depth regions on the display. In other words, compactor 10 may be equipped with a plurality of compaction measurement systems, but the measurements from these systems may be combined in such a way as to seamlessly display the overall level of compaction of a depth region to the operator, without the operator realizing that the display screen has aggregated data from more than one compaction measurement system. Thus display screen 300 may be configured to show just a single depth region that displays aggregated measurements from the plurality of compaction measurement systems. In addition, display screen 300 need not display all of the possible data gathered by the compaction measurement systems. That is, if display screen 300 shows two different display depth on screen for a region of material, these display ranges need not exactly correspond with the depth ranges for which each compaction measurement system is able to gather data.
The present disclosure provides an advantageous system and method for accurately determining the compaction response of various portions of a material region on a worksite. The system and method allow an operator to get an accurate indication of the compaction response of one or more materials at varying depths, in a manner that is easily synthesized so that the operator (or an automated control system) can take appropriate action to ensure that the various portions of the material region are properly and efficiently compacted. The system draws on the relative strengths of two different compaction measurement systems that may have different degrees of accuracy in measuring the state of compaction at different depths of material within the region.
Other embodiments, features, aspects, and principles of the disclosed examples will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be implemented in various environments and systems.
The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/289,114, filed Dec. 22, 2009, which is fully incorporated herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3599543 | Kerridge | Aug 1971 | A |
| 4979197 | Troxler et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5177415 | Quibel et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5420589 | Wells et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5493494 | Henderson | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5835053 | Davis | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6061618 | Hale et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6188942 | Corcoran et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6431790 | Anderegg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6460006 | Corcoran | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6536553 | Scanlon | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6577141 | Gandrud | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 7239150 | Troxler et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7669458 | Commuri et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 8190338 | Commuri | May 2012 | B2 |
| 20040035207 | Hamblen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050150278 | Troxler et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060096354 | Commuri et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070150147 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276602 | Anderegg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20090126953 | Anderegg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100172696 | Commuri | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110302998 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61289114 | Dec 2009 | US |
