1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method for referencing consumer preference data and merchandise and service “popularity” according to human physical and emotional characteristics, traits and personal preferences. In essence an animate, or “HUMAN” cataloging and method/system for researching and locating purchasable items and preference data, rather than an inanimate one. This system and method would preferably be Internet based, presented as a special Internet address and destination, comprising a “search engine,” or searching means based on “searcher” or Internet user supplied human trait and preference data parameters.
2. Description of the Related Art
Current “e commerce” or computer based electronically transacted business options, and related inventions thereof, are limited in scope typically with regard to the indexing and cataloging of merchandise and services. Further, “search engines” familiar to Internet users, are limited often to search results based on correlation between words or phrases submitted by the user, relative to those assigned to Internet accessible sites and data banks.
In a society of individuals who make many decisions based on dynamics of personal competition and success, and interpersonal comparison, the need for a searching means to reference information based on traits and preferences of other individuals, and groups of individuals, would clearly be valuable and of interest to many. The most compelling lure of entertainment and advertising, is information about other individuals that might be considered “private” or personal, whether they be celebrities or not. Television programs and advertising that is “revealing,” especially those focused to the negative feelings and occurrences of others, are remarkably successful: “Rubber-necking” on a highway also demonstrates the public's often macabre fascination with the plight or misfortune of others. The same can be said with the public's fascination with the success of others, mostly relative to their own circumstances and personal esteem.
The means to search personal preference and “feelings” data of actual individuals, would allow the Internet user new options in discovering the behavioral and purchasing preferences of individuals similar to themselves, or similar to a person or “type” of person relevant to the user: Those of romantic interest to an internet user/searcher, and those who the Internet user may be competitive with, are two examples of searching parameter bases that may be relevant to a particular individual searching via such newly available means. Further, peripheral areas of interest may be discovered by users as they discover selected personal data about their designated “types” of people-leading Internet searchers to revelations steered by the options displayed by such a system and searching means.
For Internet advertising, the relevance of being able to target user determined and defined micro-demographics is invaluable. A searcher who has defined their own dynamics demographically, in order to accomplish their search, could receive selected advertisements in editorially prepared formats, to maintain the highest degree of personal relevance and potential interest, unlike the generally poorly focused myriad of solicitations broadcast to millions of Internet users and mail box holders.
To date, all demographic specific devises on the Internet are geared to “sampling” and looking at the Internet users from the data-seekers' vantage point. The present invention addresses the interest and need of the Internet user to personally discover discreet demographic preference and behavioral data relative to their own personal objectives and interests: An active demographic specific vehicle from the consumers' point of view, instead of a passive one where their activity and data is sampled and they are categorized and solicited according to the interpretation and interests of unseen others—typically larger Internet based firms and advertisers.
The present invention relates to a system and method for referencing consumer preference data and merchandise and service “popularity” according to human physical and emotional characteristics, traits and personal preferences. In essence an animate, or “HUMAN” cataloging and method/system for researching and locating purchasable items and preference data, rather than an inanimate one. This system and method would preferably be Internet based, presented as a special Internet address and destination, comprising a “search engine,” or searching means based on “searcher” or Internet user supplied human trait and preference data parameters.
The present invention provides options for “users” or “searchers,” (those using the database,) to reference and compare other personal traits and feedback from “members” (those having supplied the core data to the database,) allowing the database to serve as a source of information for decision-making and correlation related to matters beyond the purchase of products and services: In essence, a “people” based Internet SEARCH ENGINE rather than a “things,” brand category or typical word-correlating search engine.
In placing the control in the hands of the Internet searcher, the intrigue and interest in the options provided by the search engine grows. The very demographic specific information that advertisers seek, is the same sort of information that individuals wish to know about each other.
Further, the present invention in providing such discreet targeting research means for Internet users, Internet advertisers are reciprocally empowered with new consumer targeting means, based on remarkably discreet demographic groupings based on consumer determined parameters. In building such a special database and search engine, advertisers are further advantaged editorially, as database information relevant to their brand or industry can form the basis of “search relevant” factoids, which are in fact paid flash advertisements relayed when the factoid information is deemed relevant to the searchers' information quest.
Accordingly, a system and method for accessing actual human personal preference and opinion data, whose unique demographic parameters are defined by an individual Internet user is provided. The system includes a computer linked to a specialized database which allows individual Internet users to supply and access human personal preference data according to trait and preference variable data input to the system.
The system contains a data correlating program which provides data sorting parameters that are defined by selected degrees of human trait and preference variables. Further, data pertaining to any one of these trait and preference variables may be assigned special program value, should special importance of the selected data be indicated by those who access the database. Variables not provided by the system to the Internet user are preferably provided by the user as keyed-in, or otherwise subjectively supplied data that may be included in data correlation and reports for that user. Users, or those accessing the database for customized data results from the overall database, may, in turn, supply information to the database, or build a data profile, should they indicate that the data they seek pertains to individuals similar to themselves. The data they seek and supply pertains to their personal traits and personal preferences, including feelings, opinions, issues and purchasing or commercial preferences.
With the system and method of the present invention, users may refine their demographic of choice within a search, by way of system provided options deemed to be standard options provided to users at selected points within a search. Users may also refine their search by re-entering the demographic related trait and preference data, preferably by re-accessing Internet site screens already accessed within the same search, for input of revised demographic parameter data.
Further, the present system and method allows advertisers to target their information (products and services) with extreme specificity to users, as the users themselves are defining the areas of demographic interest. Advertisements may occur as editorial comments with Internet links, pertinent to data in the database specific to a products' or services' sampling results. These “factoids” may be calculated and relayed specifically to a single user who has met subjective system user relevance criteria to receive selected advertising data results. Further, focus group data, or consumer preference sampling may be accomplished with immediacy and unrivaled relevance, as only users and members of selected relevance to the data solicitation might be contacted. In other words, discreet trait and preference specific groups of individuals that would be virtually impossible to locate and sample with typical focus group approaches are able to be located by the present system and method.
Some important aspects and benefits of the present invention, include that it provides:
Revenue potential of Internet based resources involving the technology of the present invention would likely be derived from options including:
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there are shown in the drawings several forms which are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
Please note that in the foregoing description, the term “database”, when described as performing a function or correlation, includes computing means which manage the database. The computing means includes a database and a database management system which receives, sorts, compiles and stores the individual personal trait and preference data in the database into searchable records.
The system and method of the present invention provides the individual Internet user and searcher, (“user”) the option of entering or identifying variables, including human traits, and other variables/aspects familiar to the “human condition,” in searching for information of personal relevance. For instance, an Internet “shopper” might have curiosity about particular preferences or shopping data of other “single women, gay, 18 to 24 years of age, “active” in demeanor, who is a DEMOCRAT politically, earning over $100,000 per year and who has a very “optimistic” outlook or attitude.” This inquiry would be entered by way of a series of keyed in or “site provided” variable options (for example, by a pull-down menu such as that shown in
The intent of the Internet visitor may be determined when initiating interaction with sites based on the present invention (
Variable options not provided to the user pre-set, as in via “pull down screens,” could selectively be keyed-in by the user for selective inclusion in the “search” should this keyed-in, or otherwise supplied data variable be understood and usable by the database searching and correlation means. This “manually input” word or phrase recognition option would allow for ever-more discreet searches, allowing for correlation and similarity with members within the database to become very specific. Perhaps more importantly, when those users who are searching the database for personally relevant, human interest information about a specific type of person (though they may not be using the database to shop or purchase), may be presented during the search with a myriad of advertising and purchasing options relevant to that user's search and demographic(s) of interest, thereby providing commercial value to those SEARCHERS/database-users who are not directly “shopping”.
Users may refine their demographic of choice within a search, by way of system provided options deemed to be standard options to provide to users at selected points within a search (
A computer and program (
Incentives could clearly be provided to members (
Objectives of the present invention are to provide new, discreet personal comparison means, and to provide new sources of purchasing/consumer information, by providing a forum for users to “relate” and identify with other specific types of people and consumers. Commercially, the present invention provides a “personal shopper” which is preferably unique to every user, as the personal shopper is a single, unique member of the site, or site-presented conglomeration of members fitting profiles deemed related to a user's data input and search parameters. Further, advertising may be targeted with relevance to both users/searchers, and advertisers (
In being able to reference human trait and personality variables, people who the user/shopper may want to emulate, or not emulate, may be referenced for instance; people similar to the user may also be sampled, allowing individuals to compare learn and compare to those who may share their circumstances (
Advertisers may target their information with extreme specificity to users, as the users themselves are defining the areas of demographic interest. Advertisements may occur as editorial comments, pertinent to data in the database specific to a products' or services' sampling results. These “factoids” may be calculated and relayed specifically to a single user who has met subjective system user relevance criteria to receive selected advertising data results.
Further, focus group data, or consumer preference sampling may be accomplished with immediacy and unrivaled relevance, as only users and members of selected relevance to the data solicitation might be contacted (
The present invention provides a new level of Internet options and service, based more on a “thinking” model than a “factual” model, where absolutes are not what is sought by users but information found between who the user is (or the “type” of person they are shopping or researching about,) and who those profiled in the database are, and what and how they choose in the context of how they feel, look and behave. This invention is a “human search engine” of the Internet, and a database that allows the user, or SEARCHER, to search human preferences and feedback, based on human traits and parameter options. Further, this invention provides the internet user the proactive control over sampling, instead of the familiar approach of the Internet world to passively sample Internet users based on their general activity on the web, such as what sites they visit frequently, etc. This is a slow and inefficient means to learn from users who are able to proactively provide discreet data about themselves, by seeking discreet data for their personal needs and reference. This is the function of the present invention.
In a preferred configuration, the “micro-demographic” of the USER or searcher, is first determined through a trait-based selection process, (
Typical shopping means on the Internet currently include searches by product or service type, searches by brand name, and personal shopper assistance from a “helper” that is not necessarily defined by the user, unlike the present invention. By sharing preferences, opinions and personal observations about self and others in the context of purchasable items and general human interest information, a venue not only for newly informed purchasing is created, but a forum for support, gift ideas, self-improvement and broader awareness of others among other results is also created. For instance, an overweight person embodying certain specific insecurities and physical circumstances, might find new ideas of what to wear to address appearance concerns by referencing people with similar circumstances, and their recommendations, observations and preferences.
That same person might learn how other similar “overweight people” deal with people who react negatively to “overweight” people; or how “thin” people feel about their own appearances, and the appearances of people the consider to be “overweight.” Further, a new business woman with specific physical and emotional traits, unsure of what to wear on the job might find her best recommendations from business women whose feedback and selections educate her to ways to advantage her in the new circumstance, from those who have already experienced it. And, a young woman wondering whether to date a certain man can reference personal feedback from both women like herself and men she deems to be similar to her potential date, for broader awareness of both perspectives in decision making; whether data is product and service related, or simply selected personal and emotional feedback.
Perhaps more importantly, that person may have entered in to a search with “weight issues” on their mind initially, and ended up focusing on people who share a common travel interest, as an exciting range of featured preferences and opinions of members, or profiles, may be revelations that steer a user in to new areas of interest, increasing commercial versatility and reach of the invention for advertisers.
A vital aspect of the invention is the fact that the “MEMBERS” or those people who have belong to the database of the present invention, having willingly, directly and proactively supplied data about themselves to the database. By prompting SEARCHERS to “join,” discreetly or with incentives, or with the requirement to answer selected relevant questions in order to further use the database, or to go to a deeper level in the database (such as to review long form, written feedback from members,) the database of the present invention can be virtually “self feeding” for information. Further, as the SEARCHER or user is seeking true information, it is unlikely they will lie or deceive in supplying data to the database, as their mind-set, or “mode” will be truthful and to think to supply deceptive data while searching what they anticipate is true data, is unlikely.
The additional option of still images and video (
On selecting a single member to review, including long-form feedback available (
Options in reviewing response data, specific to products and services for instance, may include a correlation of both product “types” and brands and/or styles within the selected micro-demographic identified by a user. For instance, within the trait data a user has input, 50 members constitute the top 1% of members most closely related to the user's selections. The user is interested in seeing what cars his selected micro-demographic prefers (
The database is referenced by the site in response to the user's search, and the search result provided to the user confirms that 10 of the 50 members in the 1% correlation group prefer SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES; on requesting brand preference, the user is supplied with the information that 5 of those 10, or half, prefer the FORD EXPLORER, 2 of those 5 own a FORD EXPLORER, and 4 of the 10 prefer the color BLACK in a SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE. In another search, a user may determine that he wants to use the top 100 members closest to his search parameters: of these members, the user is curious what watches the group owns; the site search of the database determines that the user-selected micro-demographic includes 92 members that own watches, of them the top brand is ROLEX, of which 24% of the demographic owns, 35% of that 24% (who own Rolex's) own a PRESIDENTIAL model in Gold. In a more general search regarding watches, the user also learns that his uniquely created demographic prefers SPORT watches (52%) over any other category “type” of watch. “Long form data” review of a selected member (due to interest in her photo,) within the trait-group reveals to the searcher that this member of special interest to him/her is feels that “people with gold watches are often unfaithful to their spouses.”
Such multi-leveled searches may be configured according to percentage of respondents meeting a selected degree of correlation with a user's input search data, (FIG. 17,) or a selected number of members coming closest to matching said user's data, or “bin” of members built by a user from his own personal criteria (unrelated to database means for correlation.) The means and options for correlation and member micro-demographic selection by a site referencing the database, or by a user, is virtually infinite, much the way the entire database of the internet may be referenced and cross-referenced in a multitude of ways, by way of search engines that approach the task in a variety of different ways.
The consumer preference data collected by this site would be of considerable value to many, as the discreet categories of traits and personal profile aspects could be as narrow as desired by those operating site(s) and venues utilizing the options provided by this invention. Far more detailed than just age and “who bought what where” data, the present invention takes demographic data to an entirely new level. Specific, relevant questions may selectively be “purchased” by firms needing feedback from the unique preference and/or trait-based demographics provided by databases of the present invention.
The present invention could further involve data to be provided based on sub “categories” determined directly by users/shoppers, by way of a key-in means, allowing for unlimited options to be relayed from users, for selected processing and categorizing based on correlation between data related to trait and human aspect categories offered directly by users, not having been yet made available as a “pull down” or on-screen icon option. A demographic might even be identified by user's by requesting members who identified a new sub-category manually, that had not been presented within supplied (pull down menu) options, for instance (
Further, the present invention could provide options including selected processing of the data from users/shoppers, including the option of people (specifically provided to review the database,) reviewing and categorizing data from respondents according to parameters relevant to the site needs, or venue needs, to define selected data-groupings of member feedback. In other words, human involvement in reviewing more complex data from members might provide additional sectors of information within the database that might not have been categorized or included as they may have required human interpretation to be placed subjectively in to a searchable bin, or data category.
A virtually infinite number of “micro-demographics” can be created and made available for users to reference, with selected “narrowness of focus” in pin pointing groups and types of people; it is possible that no two users may ever identify the same demographic in a search.
One very important aspect of the present invention is that application options based on this invention might allow for direct shopping, or items actually purchased by way of site(s) featuring options created by this invention, or such site(s) might refer users/shoppers to other sites via links, once preferences have been identified that have a corresponding site for more information and in some cases sites for transacting purchases of items displayed in accordance with searches by trait conducted by way of the method and system of the present invention. Links back to a site such as one(s) created based on the present art, could be made from vendors including in links from such site(s) based on this art, increasing the user base and providing a research and information service to consumers made available by the links from other sites. Listing brands as options and suggestions in both searcher and member pull-down screen options, (
The present invention may provide a selectively “pure” database that in no way is biased toward any selected options or brands, or the database may allow for all possible selections, but provide greater visibility and promotion of selected brands within user selected categories. Naturally, should the scenario be the latter, keyed-in options that may not be a brand that is specially featured, may provide search options listing brands or options that were not within site-supplied names; in this scenario, such a brand or name could be listed in the results, showing the degree of correlation; though, the inclusion of a link to that brand or supplier's own site, or the provision of direct shopping means of their items, or inclusion within pull down menus (due to a brand or name's popularity with members,) is at the option of the database owner (
The options of the present invention could be featured as the primary and independent searching means in selected site(s) involving the methods or system herein, though they could also be incorporated as aspects of a conventional, existing or familiar e-commerce site, providing additional referencing latitude to the shopping and/or utilization of said site(s.) Thus, shopping could be done by product in the familiar ways, such as by product category, and by way of the special trait and human profiling and characteristics the user selected/created micro-demographic referencing method of the present invention provides.
The application of sites that access a database based on the present invention also includes a myriad of options. For instance, a publishing company that owns several magazine titles, may have such a site. In this scenario, promotions within their magazines might draw consumers to the site, to become members and to provide core data to the database; those new members might receive selectively large incentives, whether gifts or winning potential, based on the amount of data input, meaning that selectively a member who supplies a photo or video of himself would qualify for more reward. Such a publisher might provide SELECTED brands or clients within pull down screen (site presented) options to users, as the owner of the site would have control over the categories of trait and preference data members and users receive as prompts from the site.
Further, the brands listed within commercially based options and pull-down menus, might include brands that are paying to be listed, or brands that are qualifying to be listed as determined by the publisher. Meaning, the value of controlling such a database for a firm such as a publishing company, includes the ability to provide incentives to advertisers (or selected companies,) to be included in lists that would make their brand, product or service a visible option to members and users, increasing the likelihood of their brand and product being listed and referenced in searches by users.
Further, selected brands meeting criteria determined by the publisher in this case, (or owner of the database in a broader sense,) may have their brand or name listed in bold and featuring a direct LINK to their own site, meaning that the site based on the present invention could potentially draw clients and buyers directly to selected brands' information and/or e-commerce sites, at the user's option. Further, members and/or users who input selections specific to brands meeting criteria of the database owner, may be prompted to allow for materials or other solicitations to be sent to them by selected brands, or product/service providers. Whether cooped with a publisher, a separate conventional search engine, or other property including e-commerce sites, configurations of the present invention for Internet application are many.
Enormously valuable ADVERTISING means are created that transcend existing Internet advertising options, as the present invention targets the messages with not only demographic specificity, but content and topic relevance to each individual user, or searcher. The option of search-relevant FACTOIDS which includes advertising as an aspect of a statistic from the database relevant to the searcher, relevance being a option determined by the database configuration, could provide new interest around advertising messages—each message seemingly personally created and recalled for each searcher/user. These advertising options and values are demonstrated in an example SEARCH in the SCREEN diagrams enclosed. Beyond the ability to target searchers, the ability to connect with members by posting and email means, are powerful:
This area of SERVICE to users and advertisers involves uniquely targeted EMAIL (
Message postings could appear in unique combinations, by topic or member relevance, as a searcher/user accesses boards. Should a searcher find a preference based topic to be the priority, the potential of posting or reviewing boards related to the topic from the entire database membership is an example of versatility in searching the preferred configuration of sites based on the present invention should embody. Naturally handpicked members could be sent messages selectively, as a function of a closed e-mail system within a service site involving the database of the present invention. Advertisers included based on their demographic desires and selectively by their relevance to a given search, may email and post to their “dream demographics,” and likely have their advertising received by the audience with interest and willingness to read and “link.” This, because the interest level and relevance to that member was predetermined to be above a selected level, or threshold, by parameters selectively determined as the construct of the database's categorization.
Further disclosure is included in the following presentation style “snapshot” of the invention as used in a configuration, called “SHOP BY PROFILE”, including a series of screen examples that demonstrate some of the options a SEARCHER might encounter while searching for preference information about a selected “type” of people who he/she has defined by selected trait variables, input by the SEARCHER. The SCREEN diagrams, which demonstrate an application of the present invention, are described in the following, in a scenario that encounters and details many of the options for configuration based on the system and method of the present invention, including the versatility and value of the searchable database options, and the advertising and revenue potential of an Internet site configured from aspects of the present invention.
The nature of the present invention is such that one skilled in the art of writing computer executable code (software), will be able to implement the described functions using one or a combination of popular computer programming languages such as “C++”, Visual Basic, Java or HTML and/or web application development environments. As discussed above, one of the functions performed by the system is operation as a web site.
A web site typically communicates with web browsers using the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) to send and receive data including hypertext mark-up language (HTML) web page data and executable JAVA Applets. Of course, any known data transfer protocol and web site configuration/definition language can be used to implement the present system as shown in the accompanying figures.
Although the present invention is described by way of example herein in terms of a web based system using web browsers and a site processors, the system is not limited to that particular configuration. It is contemplated that the system can be arranged such that user terminals can communicate with, and display data received from the system using any known communication and display method, for example, using a non-Internet browser WINDOWS viewer coupled with local area network protocol such as Internetwork Packet Exchange (IPX).
As shown in
Although shown as a single communication network, communication network 145 can be comprised of multiple interconnected networks, for example the Internet. As such, communication network 145 can be any communication network, but is typically the Internet or some other global computer network. Communications between the elements of the present system can be implemented using any known arrangements for accessing the communication network 145, such as dial-up serial line interface protocol/point-to-point protocol (SLIP/PPP), Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), dedicated leased-line services, broadband (cable) access, frame relay, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL), asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) or other access techniques.
The user terminals 120 have the ability to send and receive data across communication network 145, and the ability to display the received data on a display device using appropriate communication software such as an Internet web browser. By way of example, terminal 120 may be a personal computer such as an INTEL PENTIUM-based computer or an APPLE MACINTOSH computer, but is not limited to such. Other such terminals which can communicate using a global computer network such as palm top computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs) and mass-marketed Internet access devices, i.e., WEB TV, can be used.
Accordingly the user terminals 120 provide access to the site processor 110 for the purpose of accessing the electronic architecture (database and database management system) of the present invention. The system software which controls the above-described functions relies primarily on the one or more site processors 110. Site processors 110 typically communicate with network 145 across a permanent i.e., unswitched, communication link. Permanent connectivity ensures that access to server 110 is always available to terminals 120.
Site processors 110 can be any appropriately sized computing platform, the storage, processing and other functional capacities of which are determined based on expected user activity and data storage requirements. For example, site processors 110 can be server-type personal computers, mini-computers such as UNIX-based servers, and even mainframe computers.
Supply processors 130 are preferably owned and maintained by the entities of supplying goods and services for marketing. Supply processors 130 are preferably used for receiving demographics, marketing and sales data from site processors 110 and for providing corporate, product and service and other relevant information to site processors 110, terminals 120 and LIVE SHOW processors 140. Further, orders for goods and services placed by users via user/player terminal 120 can be accepted directly from user terminals 120 or via site processors 110.
As shown in
The various components of site processor 110 need not be physically contained within the same chassis or even be located in a single location. For example, the database on storage device 190 may be located at a site which is remote from the remaining elements of site processor 110, and may even be connected to CPU 150 across communication network 145 via network interface 180.
Terminals 120 and supply processors 130 are preferably comprised of the same or subset of the functional components described with respect to the site processors 110. Of course, the functional components of these devices are sized to accommodate capacities appropriate for their usage. For example, terminals 120 may include more sophisticated displays and display driving hardware than the other elements, but may contain a smaller storage device, and less powerful CPU 150 than the other components. Also, supplier processor 130 may contain a more powerful CPU 150 than site processor 110, especially in the case where supplier processor 130 is implemented by a large corporation with a sophisticated Internet presence.
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/808,538, filed Mar. 14, 2001, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/756,581, filed Jan. 8, 2001, now abandoned, which is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/175,093, filed Jan. 7, 2000, 60/176,440, filed Jan. 14, 2000, 60/189,060, filed Mar. 14, 2000, 60/212,663, filed Jun. 20, 2000, and 60/226,672, filed Aug. 22, 2000, the entire contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5041972 | Frost | Aug 1991 | A |
5661516 | Carles | Aug 1997 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5724424 | Gifford | Mar 1998 | A |
5754939 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784095 | Robbins et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794210 | Goldhaber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5848397 | Marsh et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852775 | Hidary | Dec 1998 | A |
5855515 | Pease et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5956691 | Powers | Sep 1999 | A |
5974398 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6020884 | MacNaughton et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6052122 | Sutcliffe et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6105001 | Masi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112186 | Bergh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6175831 | Weinreich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193610 | Junkin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216133 | Masthoff | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236975 | Boe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236978 | Tuzhilin | May 2001 | B1 |
6269361 | Davis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288717 | Dunkle | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321221 | Bieganski | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324566 | Himmel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338094 | Scott et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351736 | Weisberg | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6411949 | Schaffer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6466918 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480785 | Joerg et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487539 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6519629 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527557 | Lemay et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6546545 | Honarvar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601037 | Kolls | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604086 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606605 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609103 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609120 | Honarvar et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615183 | Kolls | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625581 | Perkowski | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629080 | Kolls | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6681369 | Meunier et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684197 | Kolls | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6757661 | Blaser et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792411 | Massey, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807532 | Kolls | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6871186 | Tuzhilin et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873965 | Feldman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886000 | Aggarwal et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6901406 | Nabe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6925468 | Bobbitt et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6930676 | De Haan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947976 | Devitt et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952741 | Bartlett et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6968315 | Nakisa | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970844 | Bierenbaum | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973439 | Wilk | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976439 | Uchida | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999987 | Billingsley et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003546 | Cheah | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006979 | Samra et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7014469 | Nocera et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031651 | McCormick et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043531 | Seibel et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054831 | Koenig | May 2006 | B2 |
7054900 | Goldston | May 2006 | B1 |
7082427 | Seibel et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085820 | Nickerson et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7095426 | Childress | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7120629 | Seibel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7158986 | Oliver et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7231608 | Fano et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236969 | Skillen et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7318224 | Honarvar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321233 | Strid et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330850 | Seibel et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7337127 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7356541 | Doughty | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7398219 | Wolfe | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7430514 | Childress et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7451094 | Royall, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7475032 | Patnode et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7603331 | Tuzhilin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7752326 | Smit | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8005896 | Cheah | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8103611 | Tuzhilin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8150913 | Cheah | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010013009 | Greening et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032115 | Goldstein | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010042002 | Koopersmith | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056374 | Joao | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020059379 | Harvey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065894 | Dalal et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030023489 | McGuire et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030061215 | Messina | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030142664 | Gerszberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040128624 | Arellano et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133471 | Pisaris-Henderson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040215514 | Quinlan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261127 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050125354 | Pisaris-Henderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060026067 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070073581 | Kempe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093258 | Steenstra et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118420 | Jung et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130002 | Moran et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070208610 | Pisaris-Henderson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239537 | Protheroe et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080033815 | Choi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033826 | Maislos et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090012841 | Saft et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018918 | Moneypenny et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030774 | Rothschild et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030775 | Vieri | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030972 | Rogers | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043648 | Mahdian et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055249 | Lieberman | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063283 | Kusumoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063284 | Turpin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067599 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076899 | Gbodimowo | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076902 | Grinsted et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20110087693 | Boyce | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002357397 | Jul 2003 | AU |
2003293160 | Nov 2003 | AU |
2004533020 | Oct 2004 | JP |
WO 02104005 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03058531 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004021152 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004051418 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005043341 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60175093 | Jan 2000 | US | |
60176440 | Jan 2000 | US | |
60189060 | Mar 2000 | US | |
60212663 | Jun 2000 | US | |
60226672 | Aug 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09808538 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 12777070 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09756581 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 09808538 | US |