The present invention relates to a method and a system for controlled shutdown of wind turbines. In particular, the present invention relates to a method and a system adapted to avoid backlashing of wind turbine gearboxes, drive train oscillations and similar unwanted effects.
Wind turbine generator torque loads of today are typically implemented as passive resistors having fixed torque curves. If such resistive dump loads are applied as loads to a generator, wear and tear of the resistors and unnecessarily load on the wind turbine drive train often occur.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,605,488 discloses in general terms how to use dump loads for reducing backlashing in wind turbine gearboxes. Apparently, the amount of power being dissipated in dump loads in U.S. Pat. No. 7,605,488 is controlled by varying the degree of which the dump load is active, cf. for example column 3, line 10. Here it is explicitely specified that “ . . . the dump load 5 is partly or fully activated . . . ”. Thus, the amount of power being dissipated is varied by adjusting the capacity of the dump load.
It is a disadvantage of the system suggested in U.S. Pat. No. 7,605,448 that the capacity of the dump load can only be varied in discrete steps. This incremental change (increase or decrease) of the dump load capacity may accidentally induce events that may create load inversions in the gearbox.
It may be seen as an object of embodiments of the present invention to provide a method and a system that allow controlled shutdown of wind turbines so as to avoid backlashing of wind turbine gearboxes, drive train oscillations etc.
It may be seen as a further object of embodiments of the present invention to benefit from the controllability of a generator side converter to ensure controlled shutdown of wind turbines without introducing gearbox backlashing, drive train oscillations etc.
The above-mentioned objects are complied with by providing, in a first aspect, a method for shutting down a wind turbine comprising
the method comprising the step of operating the generator side converter as a generator load in a manner so that the drive train torque has a constant direction during shutdown of the wind turbine.
The method according to the present invention is preferably applicable to full-scale wind turbine facilities where all the power generated by the power generator is passed through the power converter. The drive may optionally comprise a gearbox.
According to the first aspect of the present invention, if load inversion in the wind turbine gearbox is detected the generator side converter may be applied as a load to the generator. The load of the generator side converter may be applied in accordance with a power reference derived from a generator torque-speed curve.
If the load provided by the generator side converter is insufficient to maintain a drive train torque of a constant direction the method further comprises the step of dissipating or storing a controlled amount of excess power in the power dissipation or power storage device in a manner so that the drive train torque has a constant direction during shutdown of the wind turbine. Thus, if the load produced by the generator side converter is insufficient, the power dissipation or power storage device is activated and power is provided thereto in a manner controlled manner by the generator side converter. This may beneficially allow the power dissipation or power storage device to remove excess power from the system in a controlled manner without requiring complex controls, independent of the generator side converter controller, to regulate amounts of power passed to the power dissipation or power storage device.
The power dissipation or power storage device may include devices such as resistors, batteries, capacitors etc.
It is a general advantageous of the present invention that it facilitates a faster wind turbine shutdown. Moreover, it is more gentle to the wind turbine drive train. These advantages are achieved by having an active control scheme instead of a traditional passive control scheme. Moreover, the controlled shutdown of wind turbines may be performed with a partial functional power converter and in situations involving a grid fault.
In a second aspect the present invention relates to a wind turbine comprising
wherein the generator side converter is adapted to be applied as a generator load in a manner so that the drive train torque has a constant direction during shutdown of the wind turbine.
Again, the load of the generator side converter may be applied in accordance with a power reference derived from a generator torque-speed curve.
Preferably, the wind turbine according to the second aspect is a full-scale wind turbine where all the power generated by the power generator is passed through the power converter. The drive train may optionally comprise a gearbox.
The power dissipation or power storage device may include devices such as resistors, batteries, capacitors etc.
The load of the generator side converter alone may be sufficient to maintain a constant drive train torque direction. If so the power dissipation or power storage device may be activated and thus receive an amount of excess power as controlled, at least partially, by the generator side converter so that the drive train torque has a constant direction during shutdown of the wind turbine.
The present invention will now be explained in further details with reference to the following figures, wherein
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been disclosed by way of examples. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
In its most general aspect the present invention relates to a method and a system for controlled shutdown, also called rundown, of wind turbines. By controlled shutdown is meant that wind turbines can be closed down without introducing backlashing and other load inversion events in the drive train in general, and in wind turbine gearboxes in particular. By implementing the present invention wear and tear due to unnecessary loads on the drive train can be significantly reduced.
Referring now to
A power converter 5 comprising a generator side converter 6 and a grid side converter 7 is provided as well. The generator and grid side converters 6, 7 are separated by an intermediate DC circuit being operatively connected to a DC chopper 8. The DC chopper illustrated in
Generated AC power is fed to an associated AC grid 12 through a three-phase circuit breaker 10 and a grid transformer 11. The grid transformer 11 brings the converter voltage up to an appropriate grid voltage level.
In case of, for example, a sudden grid collapse and/or a grid side converter failure the drive train typically starts oscillating before the control system manages to shutdown the wind turbine. An oscillating drive train may induce uncontrollable backlashing in the wind turbine gearbox. However, if a constant direction of the drive train torque can be maintained during grid/grid side converter failure gearbox backlashing can be avoided.
According to the present invention the generator side converter 6 acts as an active, and thereby controllable, generator load during grid/grid side converter failure. Thus, by actively controlling the generator side converter 6 drive train oscillations and associated drive train load inversions may be avoided. If the generator power during shutdown exceeds the capacity of the generator side converter the DC chopper is activated and excess power is dissipated or stored therein.
Two different types of controlled shutdown sequences are illustrated in
During normal operation a wind turbine is controlled by an outer power control loop where the amount of active power (P) and the amount of reactive power (Q) fed into the grid are used as feedback parameters. During ShutDown Sequences 1 and 2 this outer P and Q power loop is disabled. Instead a torque vs. generator speed curve is introduced for controlling the generator side converter 6.
As depicted in
Referring now to the ShutDown Sequence 1 branch of
In the ShutDown Sequence 2 branch of
The common RunDown mode sequence offers a gentle shutdown sequence that aims to protect the gearbox against backlashing during the speed ramp down by applying a positive torque to the drive train. When a RunDown mode request is received, the converter system changes state to “RunDown” while the RunDown mode is active. During the RunDown mode the generator is kept connected and controlled until the rotor speed becomes close to a lower speed limit. In this way, no negative torque, and thereby gearbox backlashing, is generated during speed reduction until zero power speed, where the generator is disconnected from the grid.
Before initiating the RunDown mode the actual power reference from outer power loop is set as a maximum power limit during the RunDown mode. Thus, the actual power reference is stored and applied to limit a maximum power reference during RunDown mode.
As previously mentioned the outer power loop is disabled meaning that the normal power reference to the generator side converter is no longer available. Instead the generator side converter is controlled by a new power reference derived from for example a torque-speed curve, i.e. torque vs. generator speed curve. An example of a torque-speed curve approximated by 11 points is shown in
It should be noted that the new power reference for the generator side converter may be derived from a polynomial equation as well.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011 70683 | Dec 2011 | DK | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK2012/050454 | 12/7/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/083139 | 6/13/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5798631 | Spee et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
7095128 | Canini et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7605488 | Rebsdorf | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20020105189 | Mikhail | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20070246943 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070279815 | Li et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080296897 | Kovach et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090008938 | Erdman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100040468 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110140438 | Delmerico et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120056424 | Holstein et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004007461 | Sep 2005 | DE |
1863162 | Dec 2007 | EP |
0076055 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2010148062 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/DK2012/050454, Nov. 7, 2013. |
Danish Search Report for PA 2011 70683, Jun. 22, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140339829 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61568659 | Dec 2011 | US |