The present invention is related to restricting the use of a mobile communication device by an operator of a vehicle, and in particular, to restricting operator use of mobile services such as texting, watching videos, and playing games while, e.g., driving an automobile.
Mobile cellular phones have become the preferred communication device for most people around the world. They offer convenience, ease of use, communication flexibility, and extensive coverage almost anywhere a person places or receives a call. Manufacturers of mobile phones (also referred to as mobiles or cell phones) have diversified their products to add color, style, and the ability to accessorize such phones as a fashion statement. The power of communicating from anywhere, along with these personalizations, has made cell phones as indispensible as the automobile for most Americans.
In fact, the dependence on cell phones has changed the way most people communicate. Almost 20% of U.S. households have dropped their wired landline service and rely exclusively on their cell phone. People engage in cell phone conversations from restaurants, at the mall, at the airport, and while traveling between locations. It is this later situation of use while traveling that has received a great deal of attention over the past few years—more particularly, driving while talking on a cell phone. Sadly, many people are killed every year as a result of someone driving while talking on a cell phone (or trying to dial a number on a cell phone), becoming distracted, and causing an accident.
Some studies have found that just listening on a cell phone while driving is significantly distracting to the human brain, and can cause the driver to make driving errors similar to those that can occur while under the influence of alcohol. In fact, in one study at Carnegie-Mellon University, the part of the brain associated with driving had a 37% decrease in brain function while a person was listening to a conversation and trying to understand the topics discussed and formulate response questions. This serious drop in cognitive awareness occurred regardless of whether the test subjects were using hand-held or hands-free mobile devices.
To reduce automobile accidents, over 50 countries around the world have enacted laws which limit or ban cell phone use while driving. In the United States, 21 states have banned cell phone voice use by novice (typically teen) drivers and 5 have banned use for all drivers unless a hands-free device is used, Laws are also on the books in 17 states to ban all cell phone use by school bus drivers.
As risky and dangerous as cell phone voice use is, the exploding popularity of text messaging (also known as texting) in the past few years, has made texting while driving (TWD) an even greater risk. A recent poll found that over 46% of teenage drivers admitted to texting while driving, with the actual rate probably higher than that. Because texting obviously involves the visual attention of the user's eyes to read a message and type in a message, the degree of distraction is far greater. Local and national news outlets have sadly reported a steady stream of fatal accidents where the cause was texting while driving. As a result, many state legislatures have banned or are discussing bans of TWD. Fourteen states in the U.S. will have TWD bans for all drivers at all times in effect by the end of 2009, with 10 states banning texting for novice (typically teen) drivers. Most states make these primary offenses.
While legislation is a good and necessary step to influence safe driving behavior and reduce accidents, it is not sufficient to prevent, or really restrict, the incidents of distracted and dangerous driving while using a mobile device. Too many people continue to drive dangerously despite existing laws and the known dangers. What is needed is a technical solution to reliably restrict mobile device services in situations that could cause danger to the user or other people. Further, the solution needs to make it difficult to circumvent or break the solution itself. With the type of mobile devices expanding (cell phones, smart phones, Personal Digital Assistants {PDAs}, wireless computers, mobile digital TVs, etc.), and new wireless technologies emerging (cellular, WLAN, WiMAX, Whitespace, mobile DTV, etc.), and the types of mobile services diversifying (voice, text, video, Internet, games, etc.) the need for a technical solution is even greater.
In an attempt to solve the risks of TWD, a variety of technologies have emerged, or been proposed. One such technology, provided by a company Textecution, www.textecution.com, provides an application for Android phones wherein the technology disables the entire texting function when it determines the mobile phone is moving at more than 10 miles per hour (mph), which is based on the GPS (Global Positioning System) capability built-in to the phone. Another technology, identified by the name Key2SafeDriving, http://safedrivingsystems.com, uses a specially design key with a casing (also known as a fob) that surrounds the key. When the key is flipped or slid open the fob sends a Bluetooth wireless signal to the phone to disable the entire mobile phone. Similarly, a solution by ObdEdge, http://www.cellcontrol.com, uses a module attached to a vehicle to send a Bluetooth signal directly to a mobile phone indicating that the car is moving, and in turn, software on the phone disables the phone.
A primary disadvantage of the above-identified technologies is that each relies on software within the mobile phone to disable the entire phone or a specific service on the phone. The software in these technologies has to be implemented for each specific mobile phone model, and therefore isn't easily available on all phones. In addition, recent malware attacks on mobile devices by hackers and organized criminals have proven that software on mobile devices can be easily compromised. Such technologies that rely on software, within the phone itself, to disable the phone, are vulnerable to misuse. Further, some of these technologies rely on wireless Bluetooth signals from a module in the vehicle to the mobile phone, which creates another point of vulnerability. For example, a user could block the Bluetooth signal from reaching the phone, and in turn, the phone would never receive the instruction to turn itself off.
Another disadvantage of these technologies is that they tend to take an overly broad approach to solving the problems of talking while driving, and/or texting while driving. These technologies are designed to detect motion of the mobile (typically a speed above 5-10 miles per hour), and then typically disable the entire mobile phone. They do not distinguish whether the user of the mobile is in the driver's seat of a vehicle, or in the passenger seat, or the back seat, or a seat on a bus or train. As a result they typically incorporate an over-ride to allow the user to bypass the blocking feature when they are a passenger. It is obvious that this creates a significant limitation to blocking in that the user can disable the block when they desire to text and drive. That is, such technologies do not have a position detection mechanism, to operate in conjunction with a controller for activating/deactivating service (e.g., texting) provided by a mobile, for determining where a mobile is located within a moving vehicle and then determining whether a service provided by the mobile should be disabled or enabled.
Consequently, a need exists for a method and system which detects operation of a vehicle, and controls specific services on one or more mobile phones (more generally, “mobile communication devices” or “wireless communication devices”), wherein the use of such services, while driving, can sufficiently distract a driver due to, e.g., the driver viewing and/or composing one or more non-driving related communications via the mobile communication device so that there is a significant decrease in driving safety. In particular, a need exists for a reliable network-based solution that monitors vehicle and mobile device status, and provides information regarding such statuses, along with subscriber service settings, to a network-based service provider to thereby control the services provided by the mobile communication device. Such a network-based method and system can provide advantages over other arrangements which exclusively rely on software in the mobile communication device (which could be compromised) and/or on a wireless Bluetooth connection directly to the device.
Furthermore, a need exists for a method and system which: (i) detects the physical position of one or more mobile communication devices within the vehicle, (ii) determines whether one or more of those devices are within a restricted zone (e.g., the driver's seat) of the vehicle, (iii) relays information regarding such a device within such a restricted zone to a network-based database and server where alerts or reports can be generated to the subscriber, and/or the restricted zone information may be relayed to the service provider of the mobile device and in turn the service provider may enable or disable one or more services on the mobile device.
The following acronyms are used in the following discussion and are provided here for reference:
Disclosed herein is a method and system for detecting, monitoring and/or controlling one or more of mobile services for a mobile communication device (also referred to herein as a Controllable Mobile Device or CMD), and in particular, when the device is being used and the vehicle, operated by the user of the device, is moving. The present method and system (also referred to as a “mobile services control system” herein) determines whether the vehicle is being operated by a user that may also have access to a mobile communication device which, if used concurrently while the vehicle is in operation, may lead to unsafe operation of the vehicle. If the mobile services control system determines that a vehicle operator has potentially unsafe access to a mobile communication device, the mobile services control system may restrict operator access to one or more services that would otherwise be available to the operator via the mobile communication device.
In at least some embodiments of the mobile services control system, the position of a mobile communication device within the vehicle is determined, and in particular, whether the mobile communication device (also referred to as merely a “mobile device” herein) is within a restricted zone of the vehicle, which may include, but is not limited to, the driver's seat, areas near the driver's seat, other locations within the vehicle, or in some cases, the entire vehicle occupant enclosure. The present mobile services control system may be utilized to restrict mobile communication device access over any of a plurality of wireless communication standards, protocols or wireless interfaces (including CDMA, WCDMA, TDMA, UMTS, GSM, GPRS, OFDMA, WiMAX, FLO TV, Mobile DTV, WLAN, and Bluetooth technologies), and may be provided across multiple wireless network service providers. The present mobile services control system may be used to restrict access to mobile communication device services (e.g., texting, voice calls, games, videos, Internet access, online books, etc.) on a plurality of mobile communication devices available within a single vehicle occupant enclosure. The ability of embodiments of the mobile services control system to control access to services on one or more mobiles (e.g., within a vehicle occupant enclosure) may be substantially facilitated by centralizing or concentrating information related to subscribers to the mobile services control system, wherein “subscribers” as used herein, unless explicitly indicated otherwise, refers to persons or entities that contract for the user services provided by the mobile services control system (e.g., for restricting user access to certain mobile services). The information that may be centralized or concentrated by the mobile services control system include, e.g., subscriber related data for identifying: mobile(s) and/or mobile user(s) and/or vehicle(s) to which access to certain services on mobiles are to be restricted. In particular, in at least one embodiment, such centralization or concentration of subscriber information may be provided and maintained independently of most wireless service providers. For example, such centralization or concentration of subscriber information may be maintained and accessed via an Internet website, wherein such subscriber information may be accessed from a data management system which, in addition to identifying the subscribers, contains operational information about the mobile communication devices to be controlled by the mobile services control system, and the subscriber vehicles and also configurable service control parameters for allowing, e.g., subscribers to configure the mobile services control system to meet their individual needs and/or circumstances. In particular, the mobile services control system provides a mechanism for transmitting data detected during operation of vehicles to the centralized data management system for determining any restrictions on mobile services to be activated or deactivated. The present mobile services control system may also provide support for the correlation of data from the one or more detectors and/or sensors within the vehicle and the mobile communication device, with usage data from the service provider of the mobile communication device. The correlated data may be used for, but is not limited to, reporting on the use of mobile services while the vehicle is moving, sending notification messages and/or alerts, and/or real-time control (enable/disable) of mobile services on the mobile communication device. Accordingly, embodiments of the mobile services control system described herein provide one or more of the following features:
This Summary section is neither intended to be, nor should be, construed as being representative of the full extent and scope of the present disclosure. Additional benefits, features and embodiments of the present disclosure are set forth in the attached figures and in the description hereinbelow, and as described by the claims. Accordingly, it should be understood that this Summary section may not contain all of the aspects and embodiments claimed herein.
Additionally, the disclosure herein is not meant to be limiting or restrictive in any manner. Moreover, the present disclosure is intended to provide an understanding to those of ordinary skill in the art of one or more representative embodiments supporting the claims. Thus, it is important that the claims be regarded as having a scope including constructions of various features of the present disclosure insofar as they do not depart from the scope of the methods and apparatuses consistent with the present disclosure (including the originally filed claims). Moreover, the present disclosure is intended to encompass and include obvious improvements and modifications of the present disclosure.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the present disclosure, reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawing(s), and specific language will be used to describe the same.
Appearances of the phrases an “embodiment,” an “example,” or similar language in this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment, to different embodiments, or to one or more of the figures. The features, functions, and the like described herein are considered to be able to be combined in whole or in part one with another as the claims and/or art may direct, either directly or indirectly, implicitly or explicitly.
Functional units described in this specification may be labeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize their structural features. A module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like. Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of programmable or executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function, Components of a module need not necessarily be physically located together, but may, e.g., comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose for the module.
A module and/or a program of executable code may be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, data or input for the execution of such modules may be identified and illustrated herein as being an encoding of the modules, or being within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure.
The various system components and/or modules discussed herein may include one or more of the following: a host server or other computing systems including a processor for processing digital data; a memory coupled to the processor for storing digital data; an input digitizer coupled to the processor for inputting digital data; an application program stored in one or more machine data memories and accessible by the processor for directing processing of digital data by the processor; a display device coupled to the processor and memory for displaying information derived from digital data processed by the processor; and a plurality of databases or data management systems.
The present disclosure may be described herein in terms of functional block components, screen shots, user interaction descriptions, optional selections, various processing steps, and the like. It should be appreciated that such descriptions may be realized by any number of hardware and/or software components configured to perform the functions described. Accordingly, to implement such descriptions, various integrated circuit components, e.g., memory elements, processing elements, logic elements, look-up tables, and the like may be used, which may carry out a variety of functions under the control of one or more microprocessors or other control devices. Similarly, the software elements of the present disclosure may be implemented with any programming or scripting language such as C, C++, Java, COBOL, assembler, PERL, Visual Basic, SQL Stored Procedures, AJAX, extensible markup language (XML), Flex, Flash, with the various algorithms being implemented with any combination of data structures, objects, processes, routines or other programming elements. Further, it should be noted that embodiments in the present disclosure may employ any number of conventional techniques for data transmission, signaling, data processing, network control, and the like as one skilled in the art will understand. Embodiments of the present disclosure may also include detection or prevention of security issues using various techniques. Additionally, many of the functional units and/or modules herein may be described as being “in communication” with other functional units and/or modules. Being “in communication” refers to any manner and/or way in which functional units and/or modules, such as, but not limited to, computers, laptop computers, PDAs, modules, and other types of hardware and/or software, may be in communication with each other. Some non-limiting examples include communicating, sending, and/or receiving data and metadata via: a network, a wireless network, software, instructions, circuitry, phone lines, Internet lines, satellite signals, electric signals, electrical and magnetic fields and/or pulses, and/or so forth.
Communication among the parties in accordance with the present disclosure may be accomplished through any suitable communication channels, such as, for example, a telephone network, an extranet, an intranet, Internet, point of interaction device (point of sale device, personal digital assistant, cellular phone, kiosk, etc.), online communications, off-line communications, wireless communications, transponder communications, local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), networked or linked devices and/or the like. Moreover, although the invention may be implemented with TCP/IP communications protocols, embodiments of the disclosure may also be implemented using IPX, Appletalk, IP-6, NetBIOS, OSI or any number of existing or future protocols. Specific information related to the protocols, standards, and application software utilized in connection with the Internet is generally known to those skilled in the art and, as such, need not be detailed herein. See, for example, DILIP NAIK, INTERNET STANDARDS AND PROTOCOLS (1998); JAVA 2 COMPLETE, various authors, (Sybex 1999); DEBORAH RAY AND ERIC RAY, MASTERING HTML 4.0 (1997); and LOSHIN, TCP/IP CLEARLY EXPLAINED (1997), the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
As used herein, “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “is,” “are,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional unrecited elements or method steps unless explicitly stated otherwise.
In order to more fully appreciate the present disclosure and to provide additional related features, the following references are incorporated therein by reference in their entirety:
The Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 provides the user of the CMD with communication services (e.g., voice, text messaging, email, Internet access, gaming, video, and other services) via a wireless connection 50 through a wireless network 45 from a Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130 (e.g., a cellular or WiMAX wireless carrier). The MDSP 130 is operational to enable or disable services provided to each CMD 25 and records each instance a user uses a service in a mobile usage database 135.
In addition to the plurality of services available through a Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25, the CMD may also provide a unique identification capability which can be detected over-the-air from one or more position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 (three are shown in
In one embodiment of the mobile services control system 10, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 is operational to send data, via wireless signal 65, to a wireless network 60 (which may or may not be identical to the network 45), and subsequently to Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 also included as part of the system 10 in at least some embodiments thereof. The VSP 100 may be provided by a network/service operator (wireless carrier) which (via the wireless network 60) provides a mobile (wireless) data connection to a plurality of VDSs 30 in a plurality of vehicles 15. Alternatively, the VSP 100 may not be operated by the wireless carrier operating the network 60, and instead is, e.g., operated by an entity that operates the mobile services control system 10. The VDS 30 may physically be located in various positions within the vehicle 15, including, but not limited to, entirely within the vehicle occupant enclosure 20 (e.g., under the dashboard), or entirely outside of the vehicle occupant enclosure 20 (e.g., in the engine or trunk compartments), or partially within and partially outside the vehicle occupant enclosure 20 (e.g., with the VDS base unit 35 under the dashboard and the one or more detectors/sensors 37, 38, and 39 located elsewhere in the vehicle 15).
The vehicle plus mobile detected information (as also described in (c) of the Summary section hereinabove) is transmitted over wireless connection 65 (i.e., to a wireless base station 70), and such information may include position information indicative of whether the Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 is within a restricted zone for the vehicle 15, or outside of the restricted zone, wherein such a restricted zone may be a geospatial envelop (2-dimensional or 3-dimensional) within the vehicle occupant enclosure 20 that is particularly associated with where an occupant would be positioned for operating the vehicle. The vehicle plus mobile detected information may further include detailed information describing a more precise position of the CMD 25 within such a restricted zone. The position information may be defined in a 3-dimensional spatial grid of x, y, and z coordinate offsets from a reference point, which might be a point adjacent to or in the base unit 35 of the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 with optional resolutions in inches or centimeters, etc, or the position information may be provided as a one dimensional distance from, e.g., the detector and/or sensor 37 located near the driver's seat (more generally, the operator's position). Further, the data transmitted via connection 65 may include vehicle state information as to whether the vehicle 15 is moving and the operational status of the VDS 30 itself. In one embodiment, all of the data may be transmitted over the wireless connection 65 to the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 in a real-time, near-continuous stream of information.
Alternately and/or optionally, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may store the vehicle status information related to each restricted zone, each CMD 25 position, and other data in local non-volatile memory within the VDS for later forwarding to the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 via the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100. The VSP 100 may provide multiple network access methods by which the VDS 30 may forward the stored data. In one embodiment, when the VDS 30 enters receive/transmit range of VSP's 100 network 60, the VDS may be operational to transmit the stored data to wireless network base station 70 via wireless signal 65. In another embodiment, the VSP 100 may provide access to the VDS 30 through a data network 90. For example a wireless connection and signaling between the VSP 100 and the VDS 30 may be tunneled through an Internet data connection (e.g., TCP/IP) wherein the data network 90 is used to communicate data to the Mobile Services Control System 10, e.g., when the vehicle 15 resides at the premises 85 as shown in
Alternately and/or optionally, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may be configured and operable to transmit the vehicle plus mobile detected information and other data directly to the Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 via an over-the-air connection 40. In this configuration both the CMD 25 and the VDS 30 include vehicle wireless network interfaces, such as, for example a WLAN/Wi-Fi, femtocell or picocell wireless, Bluetooth, Wireless USB, or some similar connection. In this configuration, control software on the CMD 25 may determine what action to take on specific services or applications operating on the CMD, such actions may include, but is not limited to: disabling a specific service, a set of services, or all services on the CMD; enabling a specific service, a set of services, or all services on the CMD; or enabling a specific service, a set of services, or all services on the CMD but also delivering a warning to the user via a CMD user interface. In one embodiment, the vehicle operational status, restricted zone, position, and other data transmitted directly to the CMD 25 via an over-the-air connection 40, may operate directly with a specially constructed battery on the CMD, which in turn disables the entire CMD. The special battery (not shown) may be constructed in the same shape, size, and form of a standard battery for the CMD with the addition of internal digital logic which controls the flow of power from the battery to the CMD wherein the digital logic receives the vehicle operational status, restricted zone, position, and other data transmitted via over-the-air connection 40 and decides whether to enable or disable the flow of power to the CMD.
Returning to
The Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 may be operational to deliver the vehicle plus mobile detected information to the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 for storage in the Safe Driving Database 110, also included in the mobile services control system 10. The SDRS 105 may be provided by the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100, the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130, or a third party service provider as one skilled in the art will understand. The SDRS 105 may store the vehicle plus mobile detected information in a data management system 110, also denoted herein as the Safe Driving Database 110, which may be considered as a component of the system 10 in at least some embodiments. Note that the Safe Driving Database 110 may also contain, but is not limited to, information identifying each subscriber subscribing to the services provided by the mobile services control system 10, registration information identifying the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 for a specific vehicle managed/owned by the subscriber, registration information identifying one or more mobile devices 25 for this subscriber, customizable service control settings (e.g., allowed or restricted services, time-of-day controls, report options, etc.), and information that describes subscribers to the SDRS 105 (e.g., name, address, etc.). Subscribers subscribing to the services provided by the mobile services control system 10 include, for example, parents who register a vehicle 15 for a teenage child and equip it with the VDS 30 to disable use of the teen's CMDs 25 within that vehicle. Note that other entities may access the subscriber data within the Safe Driving Database 110. These other entities may include, for example, one or more Mobile Device Service Providers (MDSP) 130 which provide mobile wireless services (e.g., voice, text messaging, email, Internet access, gaming, etc.) to, e.g., a teenager's CMD 25. Note that in at least some embodiment of the mobile services control system 10, such providers 130 are not part of the system 10, but instead, are necessary for the operation of the system 10.
In addition, the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 may be operational to provide user interfaces, such as, for example, Internet web-based interfaces 115 for users (e.g., subscribers to the services provided by the mobile services control system 10) to configure data monitoring and service control settings for the one or more vehicles 15 and one or more CMDs 25 such users manage. The service control settings may define which mobile services (e.g., voice, text messaging, email, Internet access, gaming, etc.) to allow and which to disable under which conditions (e.g., when the vehicle is moving), Alternately and/or optionally service control settings may be provided as part of the Service Decision System 125 (
In one embodiment, the Safe Driving Database 110 (and/or the SDRS 105) may be hosted in a network, such as, any location or network site connected to the Internet and independently operated from the VSP 100 and/or MDSP 130. Alternatively, the Safe Driving Database 110 (and/or the SDRS 105) may be hosted at a location or network site administered by a network-based VSP 100, or by a network-based MDSP 130, wherein the Safe Driving Database 110 (and/or the SDRS 105) may be operated by the VSP 100, the MDSP 130, or by a third-party. As such, the Safe Driving Database 110 may operate as a national database monitoring and managing all registered vehicles 15 with multiple mobile service providers 130 that are able to access the Safe Driving Database 110. Alternately, the Safe Driving Database 110 may be operated by an independent “third party” company (e.g., a software or insurance company) for a specific set of subscribers, and/or within a specified geographic region, or the Safe Driving Database may be managed and operated by the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 or the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130.
In one embodiment, the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 may be implemented as two or more modules, where one or more of those modules is hosted on a subscriber's computing platform, such as, for example, a home personal computer, a subscriber's mobile device, or some similar platform, and with one or more other modules hosted in a service provider 130 network. This arrangement allows distributed report and control management from a remote subscriber computer. In yet another embodiment, all modules of the SDRS 105 may be located on a subscriber computing platform.
In one embodiment, the registrations of one or more CMDs 25 are associated in the SDRS 105 with the registration of the VDS 30 for a specific vehicle 15. The mobile services control system 10 may simply be operable to control services (enable or disable) on the one or more registered CMDs 25 whenever motion is detected by the VDS 30 in the associated vehicle 15, or alternately stated, the system 10 does not detect the presence or position of a CMD 25 within the registered vehicle 15, and instead assumes that services on the one or more registered CMDs 25 should be disabled whenever the vehicle 15 is in motion. With this configuration of mobile services control system 10, there may be situations where the subscriber to the mobile control services system 10 knows that the user of CMD 25 (e.g., their teenaged child, or their employee) will not be using the associated vehicle 15 (registered through the vehicle's VDS 30) on a particular day, or during a particular time. In such situations, the vehicle 15 may be used by another person and may be moving while the subscriber knows the registered CMD 25 is not in the vehicle 15. A similar situation may arise when the subscriber and user are one in the same person and that person drops their vehicle 15 off at an auto repair shop for work during the day and takes their registered CMD 25 with them. Throughout that day the vehicle 15 may be driven by repair shop personnel, but the CMD 25 is with the subscriber/user where it is desirable to allow full use of the CMD 25 services.
Alternately and/or optionally, the mobile services control system 10 may be operational to provide an override function to the subscriber or user of the mobile services control system 10 which allows the subscriber or user to temporarily override the control of services on the CMD 25 by selecting an option via a user interface 115 (e.g., an Internet web interface, a mobile device interface, some other computer interface, etc.), or via an option displayed on the CMD 25. Alternately and/or optionally, the override may be initiated by the user of the CMD 25 by sending a simple text message or voice message to a specified number designated by the Service Decision System 125, or alternately, the Safe Driving Registration System 105 to receive override messages, such message initiating the override for a specific amount of time specified by the user of the CMD 25 via the message. In such a case, the Service Decision System 125 or alternately the Safe Driving Registration System 105 may send an email or voice or text alert to the subscriber of the mobile services control system 10 that may also include information of the times that the associated vehicle 15 was in motion in relation to the time of the override. These text alerts then provide a method for the subscriber to change the configuration of the mobile services control system 10 to disallow user of CMD 25 to self-generate override messages if this feature is being abused. Alternately and/or optionally, in one embodiment, when: (i) the VSP 100 and MDSP 130 are operated by the same business entity, and wireless networks 45 and 60 are one in the same network (or substantially so), or (ii) the VSP 100 and MDSP 130 are different business entities but are sharing information to support increased operability of the Mobile Services Control System 10, then in either case, information related to the location of the base stations in wireless communication with the CMD 25 and VDS 30 (e.g., base stations 70 and 55 in
In one embodiment of the mobile services control system 10, the Services Decision System 125 may be operational to receive the vehicle plus mobile detected information (e.g., vehicle operational status, CMD position information, restricted zone data, etc.) and service control settings (e.g., subscriber service selections, subscriber preferences, service provider options, etc.) to determine for each managed communication service whether to enable or disable the service. The vehicle plus mobile detected information may be received by the Service Decision System 125 periodically at set intervals or in a real-time near-continuous stream of data. A high level flowchart of the processing performed by the Service Decision System 125 is described hereinbelow, and illustrated in
In one embodiment, the Service Decision System 125 may be operational to connect with the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130 to receive the vehicle plus mobile detected information from the MDSP via the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 from the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 where the vehicle plus mobile detected information is stored in the Safe Driving Database 110. Data is transmitted to and from between the MDSP 130 and VSP 100 via a direct connection 145 when a compatible data format and signaling interfaces exist, or alternately/optionally via Service Provider Interworking function 140 when some type of data format or signaling conversion is necessary. The vehicle plus mobile detected information may be transmitted based on service provider access parameters by periodic polling and “pull” requests from the MDSP 130 to the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS), or based on event-driven “push” transmissions from the SDRS 105 to the MDSP 130. In one embodiment, this vehicle plus mobile detected information is transmitted in a real-time data stream to allow real-time control of the plurality of services on each CMD 25 as it is moved in and out of the restricted zone in the vehicle occupant enclosure 20. In this later configuration, the Service Decision System 125 forwards the determinations it makes (e.g., to enable or disable a specific service) on to the MDSP 130 which, in turn, may enable or disable one or more of the services on the CMD 25. Further, in this configuration, the Service Decision System 125 may be physically hosted by the MDSP 130 in the MDSP's network, or hosted by a third party service provider, which may, or may not, be the same service provider hosting the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 and/or Safe Driving Database 110.
Alternately and/or optionally, the Service Decision System 125 may be operational to connect directly via communications path 120 to the SDRS 105 to receive the vehicle plus mobile detected information from the SDRS 105 without transiting the VSP 100 and MDSP 130. In this configuration, data may still be transmitted between the SDRS 105 and Service Decision System 125 using a polling (“pull”), or event-driven (“push”) method, or real-time near continuous stream. In this configuration, the Service Decision System 125 forwards the determinations it makes to enable or disable a CMD 25 specific service to the SDRS 105 which sets an enable/disable flag for each such service in the SDRS, which the MDSP 130 is then operational to query that flag via a “pull” request or “push” notification. Further, in this configuration, the Service Decision System 125 may be physically hosted by the same service provider hosting the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 and/or Safe Driving Database 110, or possibly by a third party service provider.
The Service Decision System 125 also provides a user interface 115 (e.g., a computer software interface, an Internet web interface, a mobile device interface, or some other user interface) for subscribers to view and manage their service control settings, for administrators of the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130 to manage operational settings, and/or for administrators of the SDRS 105 to manage operational parameters.
Disclosed in
The implementation of the Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 may include an operating system 210 and a plurality of services/applications 205, including, but not limited to, voice, text messaging, video, Internet access, games, and other types of service. The term “service” in the present context, includes interactive mobile communication services, display or output only services, and input only services. The CMD 25 may also include a vehicle wireless network interface 215 which supports a typical wireless local area network (WLAN), for example, Wi-Fi, or some other wireless local network capability, like, for example, femtocell or picocell wireless, Bluetooth, Wireless USB, etc. The vehicle wireless network 215 may be configured for wireless connection to the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30, or other wireless devices in proximity to the CMD 25. In addition, as a mobile device, the CMD 25 also provides a service provider wireless network interface 220 which connects the CMD 25 to the Mobile Device's Service Provider (MDSP) 130 (i.e., wireless network 45), shown in
The Vehicle Detection System 30 (VDS) may be operational to detect a Controllable Mobile Device 25 (CMD) through the Mobile Device Air Identifier 200 (
Alternately, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 and CMD 25 may be operational to use another over-the-air identification and position detection technology other than RFID, such as, using acoustic methods such as ultrasound, using optical technologies such as InfraRed (IR), or other similar technologies for determining the position of the CMD relative to the VDS.
The Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 may further be operational to support control software 225 (
Disclosed in
As disclosed in
Disclosed in
Alternately and/or optionally, the vehicle motion sensor 305 may report the vehicle is in operation to the SDRS 105 based on a combination of current movement or recent movement (e.g., within the past 2-4 minutes, or some configurable amount of time). If the detect traffic option (as determined in step 440) is set in the vehicle motion sensor 305, then the logical combination would prevent intermittent use of CMD 25 services during traffic stoplights, or in stop-and-go congested traffic whereby the vehicle motion sensor 305 would continuously report the vehicle 15 is in operation until it is no longer moving. Recent motion is calculated (step 445) by continually updating a time variable each time the vehicle motion sensor 305 determines that the vehicle is in motion 415 as the difference between the current time and the vehicle last moved time. If the vehicle speed (as determined in step 405) is below the threshold (step 410) and the detect traffic option (as determined in step 440) is on, and the vehicle 15 has not moved recently, then the vehicle motion sensor 305 reports to the VDS detection engine 300 that the vehicle is not in operation in step 435. Otherwise, if the vehicle 15 has moved recently then the vehicle motion sensor 305 reports the vehicle is in operation in step 455.
The vehicle motion sensor 305 may report the raw data including vehicle speed, engine power state, the vehicle last moved time, and the detect traffic option to the SDRS 105 via the VSP 100 where the SDRS 105 would be operational to provide the vehicle motion sensor logic to determine whether brief traffic stops or congested traffic constitute that the vehicle is in operation, or not. Alternately and/or optionally, the vehicle motion sensor 305 may only report state changes to the SDRS 105 (e.g., the vehicle 15 is in operation, or the vehicle is not in operation), or the vehicle motion sensor may regularly and periodically report (e.g., every minute, or every few seconds, a real-time stream, or some such appropriate interval) the current status to the SDRS 105. Alternately and/or optionally, the Service Decision System 125 may provide the vehicle motion sensor logic with the raw data transmitted from the VDS 30 to the Service Decision System via the SDRS 105.
Returning to
The Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may also include a detection engine 300 (e.g., a hardware/software configuration of computational equipment) which determines whether a detected Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 is within a restricted zone while the vehicle 15. In one embodiment the detection engine 300 is in communication with one or more of a plurality of position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 to receive real-time position information about one or more Controllable Mobile Devices 25. The detection engine 300 also receives motion sensing information from the vehicle motion sensor 305 and possibly engine powered on/off information from the vehicle 15. If the vehicle motion sensor 305 uses an accelerometer to provide motion sensing information, the detection engine 300 may be operational to discern vibrations associated with vehicle motion from other motions caused by other sources such as wind, or movement within the vehicle 15.
In one embodiment, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may receive motion sensing information from the CMD 25, via the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP), 130 which may include, but is not limited to, a GPS capability built-in to the CMD, or motion determination by the MDSP wireless network, such as, for example, triangulation of signals between multiple cellular radio frequency towers, or other means available in the MDSP to determine motion of the CMD. In one variation of this embodiment, the motion sensing information is determined by the MDSP 130 and relayed via the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 over wireless connection 65 to the VDS 30, where the MDSP and VSP may be the same network service provider. In another variation, the motion sensing information may be relayed by the MDSP 130 back to the CMD 25 via wireless connection 50 and then transmitted by the vehicle wireless network 215 on the CMD to the vehicle wireless network 310 on the VDS.
The detection engine 300 further may be operational to provide the ability to define a “restricted zone” within the vehicle wherein CMDs 25 are detected and possibly services on the Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) are disabled. In one embodiment, such a restricted zone is configurable by the person who installs the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 or possibly by the subscriber. The detection engine 300 of the VDS 30 may provide a wired configuration port 330, such as, for example a serial port, a USB port, or similar interface technology, to allow a computational device, such as, for example, a personal computer, a notebook computer, a PDA, or even a mobile phone, to connect to the detection engine and provide a user interface 340 for configuring the restricted zone. The user interface (UI) may be graphical, or numerical, or some such appropriate UI. The connection between the detection engine 300 and the computational device may be wired or a wireless connection, and it may use the vehicle wireless network interface 310, for example a Wi-Fi connection. Alternately and/or optionally, the detection engine 300 may provide a default restricted zone.
The Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may further be operational to provide a Detection System Air Identifier 325. In one embodiment the Detection System Air IDentifier 325 includes a Radio Frequency IDentifier (RFID) transponder or tag. The one or more position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 may be operational to read the Detection System Air IDentifier to verify that the Detection System Air IDentifier is readable, thereby deducing that the VDS base unit 35 (
Alternately and/or optionally, the VDS 30 may be operational to detect and identify a Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 via one or more wireless signals from the CMD 25. This includes, but is not limited to, detection and identification via the local area vehicle wireless network capability 310 in the VDS 30 and corresponding local area wireless network capability 215 in the CMD 25 over wireless connection 40 wherein the presence of a specific CMD 25 may be detected and identified. Alternately and/or optionally, the VDS 30 may be operational to receive and connect with the wireless network signal 50 (e.g., the cellular or some such similar technology) from the CMD 25 intended for the MDSP 130 service provider through the MDSP's wireless network 45 wherein the VDS 30 may be operational to have the necessary encryption codes and wireless signaling technology to read the wireless network signal 50 and through that signal identify the specific CMD 25.
The VDS base unit 35 configuration of the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may include the detection engine, 300 vehicle motion sensor 305, Detection System Air IDentifier 325, vehicle wireless network 310, and service provider wireless network 315 components or functions. The VDS base unit 35 may also include one of the position detectors 37, 38, 39.
As described above, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may yet be operational to provide one or more position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39. In one embodiment, each position detector 37, 38, 39 includes a Radio Frequency IDentifier (RFID) reader. Each such RFID reader transmits a signal 380 wirelessly which any of the RFID tags in the area pick-up and in turn each tag transmits it's ID number, and possibly other data, back to the reader. Passive tags use the signal from such a reader to generate enough power for the tag to transmit the response. The VDS 30 may provide one or more RFID readers as position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39. A configuration of one reader could be placed in the dashboard area of a vehicle and provide approximately a circular detection area as the restricted zone. In this implementation the single position detector 37 (one RFID reader) may be implemented in the same component (a single “pod”) along with all of the other VDS functions described above. Alternately, or in addition to, the single position detector 37, could be implemented in a separate physical component from the other base unit VDS 35 functions.
Additional position detectors and/or sensors 38, 39, for example, a total of three detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 placed at appropriate distances from one another, may allow the detection engine 300 of Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 to triangulate the exact position of a CMD 25, by comparing relative response signal strengths, and thereby determine whether it is within a restricted zone. The triangulation logic employs standard algorithms to calculate a more accurate position of the CMD 25. In one embodiment, the VDS 30 may use one or two detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 to determine the approximate position of the CMD 25 by also detecting the relative strength of the RFID signals with respect to the known location of the detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39, and thereby approximate whether the CMD is within the restricted zone. The VDS 30 may support more than three position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 depending on the position accuracy needed and the size of the vehicle.
Each position detector 37, 38, 39 may be connected to the VDS base unit 35 by a wired connection 345, 350, 355 for transmitting detected information to the detection engine 300 along with providing power to each of the remote position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39. Alternately, each position detector may provide it's own vehicle wireless network interface, such as, for example, Wi-Fi, to transmit data wirelessly 345, 350, 355 to and from the VDS base unit 35. Wireless position detectors and/or sensors 37, 38, 39 may receive power from some other source, such as, for example, batteries, solar power, wireless power, wind power through vehicle movement, or other power sources.
Further, each position detector 37, 38, 39 may also be configured with a Position Detector Air Identifier 360, 370, 375, such as, for example, an integrated RFID tag, within the detector which is configured to respond to the queries of other detectors and/or sensors (e.g., RFID readers). At the same time, each position detector is configured to ignore it's own Position Detector Air Identifier.
The Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may additionally be operational to detect wireless signal 380 from one or more Controllable Mobile Devices 25 in parallel within the restricted zone and to process that data through the detection engine 300 and to transmit that data to the VPS 100 via the service provider wireless network 315 interface in an interleaved, virtually simultaneous fashion.
In one embodiment, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may use other technology methods to detect the position of one or more CMDs 25 within a restricted zone. These include, but are not limited to, detecting the strength of an electromagnetic signal from the CMD 25, such as, for example, a radio frequency signal, which may emanate from the Bluetooth or Wi-Fi capability on the mobile device, or from the cellular signal of the mobile device, or from a different electromagnetic signal source on the CMD 25.
In a further embodiment, the detection engine 300 of the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may compare the absolute position of the Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 to the absolute position of the VDS base unit 35 to determine if the CMD is within the relative boundary of the restricted zone. In this configuration, the absolute position of the CMD 25 may be determined by multiple methods, including, but not limited to, the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130 using the signal strength from its wireless network base stations 55 to triangulate the position of the CMD, or by a GPS location capability built-in to the CMD 25 in operation with a GPS network and the MDSP 130. Further, in this configuration, the absolute position of the VDS 30 may be determined by multiple methods, including, but not limited to, the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 using the signal strength from its wireless network base stations 70 to triangulate the position of the VDS 30, or by a GPS location capability built-in to the VDS 30 in operation with a GPS network and the VSP 100. Both the MDSP and the VSP, or the GPS network, are operational to transmit the determined absolute position, probably stated in geographical coordinates, to the VSP via wireless network connection 65 where the detection engine compares the absolute positions of the CMD 25 and VDS 30 with the relative boundary of the restricted zone.
In yet another embodiment, the Vehicle Detection System (VDS) 30 may detect a CMD 25 through conduction of an electrostatic charge by the user holding the mobile device and touching the steering wheel, or similar part of the vehicle in the driver's seat, thereby creating an electrostatic connection leading to the deduction that the driver user is holding the mobile device within the restricted zone.
Disclosed in
The safe driving engine 500 is also operational to transmit information from the Safe Driving Database 110 to the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130 via the Vehicle Service Provider (VSP) 100 through various land based and wireless based communication networks and/or to receive information from the MDSP 130 which may include, for example, usage data for specific mobile services. With mobile usage data, the safe driving engine 500 may correlate that data with vehicle operational data and, possibly CMD 25 restricted zone position data, and/or perform other calculations on the data.
Disclosed in
Alternately and/or optionally, the Service Decision System 125 may be in direct communication 120 with the Safe Driving Registration System (SDRS) 105 to receive the vehicle plus mobile detected information.
The service decision engine 600 may also be operational to receive input service control settings 605 which may include, but are not limited to, parameters defined by state or local laws, parameters set by the Mobile Device Service Provider (MDSP) 130, parameters set by individual subscribers for all users of CMDs 25 for the subscriber, and/or individual users within a group managed by the subscriber. The service control settings 605 may include, but are not limited to, parameters that define which service the service decision engine 600 controls for which users (e.g., voice calls, text messaging, video calls or messaging, Internet access, games, etc.); how those services are controlled (e.g., disable the service when the vehicle is operational, disable the service when the Controllable Mobile Device (CMD) 25 is within the restricted zone, enable the service when the CMD moves outside of the restricted zone, enable the service when the CMD is within the restricted zone but send a warning or reminder message to the CMD, as well as other possible control scenarios); what time frames some services may be enabled or disabled, as well as other control preferences.
Further, the service control settings 605 may be stored and managed in operations with the service decision engine of the Service Decision System 125, or in direct operation with the SDRS 105.
Disclosed in
In one embodiment, the service directive is transmitted in a real-time or near-continuous stream to the MDSP 130 or SDRS 105, or alternately could be stored and forwarded in some other timing arrangement.
Alternately, the Service Decision System 125 and service decision engine 600 may be provided in any other suitable component of the mobile service control system 10, including, but not limited to, the mobile device control software 225 of the CMD 25 (as illustrated in
Disclosed in
Referring again to
Disclosed herein is another embodiment of the mobile services control system 10 that is well suited for vehicles 15 that are primarily operated by a single driver-operator, or driven or operated by multiple driver-operators who are scheduled so that at any particular time, the driver-operator of a corresponding vehicle 15 is known with high confidence (e.g., commercial drivers of vehicles such as trucks and taxi cabs, operators of public transportation such as buses or trains, and drivers of government vehicles). Since such a driver-operator of a vehicle 15 is often the primary user of a unique CMD 25 or unique CMD's, knowledge of the motion of the vehicle 15 in conjunction with knowledge of the operator of that vehicle (perhaps at a specific time) in conjunction with knowledge of a unique identifier of the operator's CMD 25 (such as a cell phone number of the CMD(s), or Mobile Device Air Identifier of the CMD(s)), enables the Mobile Services Control System 10 to provide notifications to appropriate wireless carrier network equipment for activating and/or deactivating CMD services (e.g., texting, etc.). In particular, such activation and/or deactivation may be substantially solely dependent upon a determination of whether the vehicle 15 is moving. In this embodiment, the Safe Driving Registration System 105 (
Referencing
The present disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. Further, the description herein is not intended to limit the present disclosure to the form disclosed herein. Consequently, variation and modification commiserate with the above teachings, within the skill and knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present disclosure. The present disclosure is further intended to explain the best mode presently known of practicing the invention as recited in the claims, and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the present disclosure, or other embodiments derived therefrom, e.g., with the various modifications required by their particular application or uses of the present disclosure.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/833,265 filed Jun. 6, 2022, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/236,436 filed Dec. 29, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/233,784 filed Aug. 10, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,172,070, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/336,282 filed Jul. 21, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,451,447, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/386,643 filed Jun. 7, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,787,936, which is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/042793 having an international filing date of Jul. 21, 2010, which designated the United States, which PCT application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/227,404 filed Jul. 21, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/267,064 filed Dec. 6, 2009, the entire disclosure of each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4297539 | Fairbanks | Oct 1981 | A |
4908611 | Iino | Mar 1990 | A |
5146407 | Motohashi | Sep 1992 | A |
5148153 | Haymond | Sep 1992 | A |
5191312 | Altmann et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5504482 | Schreder | Apr 1996 | A |
5515364 | Fague | May 1996 | A |
5519410 | Smalanskas et al. | May 1996 | A |
5541572 | Okamoto et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548764 | Duley et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548800 | Olds et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5649316 | Prudhomme et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5749052 | Hidem et al. | May 1998 | A |
5815407 | Huffman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5842124 | Kenagy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852775 | Hidary | Dec 1998 | A |
5862476 | Hasegawa | Jan 1999 | A |
5864757 | Parker | Jan 1999 | A |
5887258 | Lemozit et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890067 | Chang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5949345 | Beckert et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963550 | Hirata et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991749 | Morrill, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023232 | Eitzenberger | Feb 2000 | A |
6028537 | Suman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6085096 | Nakamura | Jul 2000 | A |
6088586 | Haverty | Jul 2000 | A |
6122486 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122682 | Andrews | Sep 2000 | A |
6131045 | Iwata | Oct 2000 | A |
6134447 | Havinis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154172 | Piccionelli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6198927 | Wright et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208866 | Rouhollahzadeh et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222458 | Harris | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225897 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230017 | Andersson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233448 | Alperovich et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256503 | Stephens | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256558 | Sugiura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262657 | Okuda et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263190 | Mamori et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285868 | Ladue | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298131 | Veschi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298306 | Suarez et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301484 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311078 | Hardouin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314282 | Weber et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343212 | Weber et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343213 | Steer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353778 | Brown | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356812 | Cragun | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389287 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393301 | Oda | May 2002 | B1 |
6418309 | Moon et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421544 | Sawada | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438385 | Heinonen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456822 | Gofman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459891 | Whinnett et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496703 | da Silva | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496709 | Murray | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526275 | Calvert | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542730 | Hosain | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546257 | Stewart | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556810 | Suzuki | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6580973 | Leman et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594483 | Nykanen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598034 | Kloth | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600975 | Moriguchi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6643517 | Steer | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647257 | Owensby | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647269 | Hendrey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650894 | Berstis et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678516 | Nordman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687497 | Parvulescu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687506 | Girod | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690940 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701158 | Moreth | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714519 | Luzzatti et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721542 | Anttila et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728542 | Meda | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731925 | Naboulsi | May 2004 | B2 |
6771946 | Oyaski | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807435 | Yamashita | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816731 | Maruyama | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6819928 | Hokao | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832093 | Ranta | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847822 | Dennison et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6885869 | Raith | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6922571 | Kinoshita | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925105 | Partyka | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934547 | Suzuki | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6961561 | Himmel et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973333 | O'Neil | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978136 | Jenniges et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7003525 | Horvitz et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006793 | Himmel et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015831 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035828 | Ketonen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039425 | Mazawa et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7064656 | Belcher et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072753 | Eberle et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7107058 | Inoguchi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110749 | Zellner et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116992 | Tsunehara et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7123874 | Brennan | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7149627 | Ockerse et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181228 | Boesch | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181229 | Singh et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187953 | Bauchot et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206615 | Ochi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7242946 | Kokkonen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260390 | Skinner et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269627 | Knauerhase | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7319696 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330895 | Horvitz | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343148 | O'Neil | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349782 | Churchill et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359713 | Tiwari | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7359714 | Parupudi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369845 | Keohane et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7394791 | Proctor, Jr. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7395046 | Hossain et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400891 | Aaron | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403785 | Daniels et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430724 | Othmer | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437752 | Heard et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7471929 | Fujioka et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474264 | Bolduc et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477135 | Belcher et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505784 | Barbera | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7619507 | Santos et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640101 | Pair et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7734315 | Rathus et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738831 | Nath et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7813741 | Hendrey et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7856203 | Lipovski | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876205 | Catten et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7903029 | Dupray | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7979057 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8000689 | Featherstone et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8045976 | Kiddie et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8103292 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8131205 | Rosen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160560 | Geyer et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8224353 | Wright et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8285308 | Wright et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8359005 | Smith et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8471706 | Schuster et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8527013 | Guba et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560161 | Kator et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8604920 | Armitage et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8761821 | Tibbitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8787936 | Tibbitts et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9098859 | Moinuddin et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9386447 | Tibbitts et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9451447 | Tibbitts et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9615213 | Tibbitts et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9854426 | Wang et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
RE47216 | Brown et al. | Jan 2019 | E |
10172070 | Tibbitts et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10440451 | Balakrishnan et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10506091 | Tibbitts et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
11021164 | Tibbitts et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11082758 | Balakrishnan et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20010050614 | Yang | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020032510 | Turnbull et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039896 | Brown | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020041240 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049069 | Johnson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065112 | Endoh et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020128000 | Do | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168981 | Meda | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198004 | Heie et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198005 | Hilton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030129995 | Niwa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137408 | Breiner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030143988 | Jamadagni | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040092253 | Simonds et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093155 | Simonds et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100368 | Lobaza et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040132467 | Hull et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153362 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156333 | Bush | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040198332 | Lundsgaard | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203766 | Jenniges et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203900 | Cedervall et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236475 | Chowdhary | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243292 | Roy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040248589 | Gwon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251745 | Baruque et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253963 | Park et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037760 | Maruyama | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070298 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096026 | Chitrapu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119002 | Bauchot et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153680 | Yoshioka et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170850 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171650 | Basir et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050179519 | Kawamura et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184860 | Taruki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050255874 | Stewart-Baxter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261011 | Scott | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264404 | Franczyk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040640 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046765 | Kogure | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052919 | Hong et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061988 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060099940 | Pfleging et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099959 | Staton et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099969 | Staton et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104297 | Buyukkoc et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116807 | Hijikata | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136131 | Dugan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136291 | Morita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148490 | Bates et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060211412 | Vance | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217130 | Rowitch et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229058 | Rosenberg | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246918 | Fok et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293842 | Casino | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016643 | Boss et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070072616 | Irani | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082678 | Himmelstein | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088823 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070174612 | Urban | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070257815 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271234 | Ravikiran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287420 | Kirke | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287474 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288127 | Haq | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080061988 | Mock et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064446 | Camp et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075056 | Thome | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080139183 | Keohane et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183388 | Goodrich | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080214211 | Lipovski | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215209 | Ikeda et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080252487 | McClellan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255888 | Berkobin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268769 | Brown et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275604 | Perry et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294302 | Basir | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294690 | McClellan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002147 | Bloebaum et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090004968 | Miyake | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029675 | Steinmetz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082951 | Graessley | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085728 | Catten et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090085744 | Sellin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098855 | Fernandez et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090111422 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090157307 | Krumm et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163243 | Barbera | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177336 | McClellan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090224931 | Dietz et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090309787 | Gildea | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100033133 | Vetter | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100033312 | Chauncey et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100033333 | Victor et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069018 | Simmons et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087984 | Joseph | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131304 | Collopy et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100204877 | Schwartz | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207787 | Catten et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210254 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216509 | Riemer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233959 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238009 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250021 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279647 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299017 | Hansen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100323657 | Barnard et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009107 | Guba et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021234 | Tibbitts et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110065456 | Brennan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077028 | Wilkes, III et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110092159 | Park et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110117903 | Bradley | May 2011 | A1 |
20110151842 | Olincy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151852 | Olincy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166936 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110195699 | Tadayon et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213628 | Peak et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231628 | Gelter et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263240 | Featherstone et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110294520 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120015690 | Miao | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120058750 | Olincy et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058755 | Olincy et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058756 | Olincy et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071151 | Abramson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072243 | Collins et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074770 | Lee | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089423 | Tamir et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101855 | Collins et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120108219 | Kiddie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109692 | Collins et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123806 | Schumann, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129545 | Hodis et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120214463 | Smith et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215594 | Gravelle | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226413 | Chen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120231779 | Rathus et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244883 | Tibbitts et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120264409 | Geyer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268235 | Farhan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120323690 | Michael | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130017816 | Talty et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019262 | Bhatia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023229 | Messerly | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035117 | Litkouhi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130084847 | Tibbitts et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130150004 | Rosen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130217331 | Manente | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225092 | Chalmers et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238365 | Nepomuceno | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130302758 | Wright | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316311 | England | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332007 | Louboutin | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344856 | Silver et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140095305 | Armitage et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140113619 | Tibbitts et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142805 | Frye | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142989 | Grosso | May 2014 | A1 |
20140236695 | Shvarts et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140266789 | Matus | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272847 | Grimes et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302834 | Jones | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140306799 | Ricci | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140322676 | Raman | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364108 | Tibbitts et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372017 | Armitage | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150017972 | Osann, Jr. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150054639 | Rosen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150081404 | Basir | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081605 | Im et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150106289 | Basir et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120336 | Grokop et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160021238 | Abramson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160086285 | Jordan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160171521 | Ramirez et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160309018 | Tibbitts et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160353355 | Tibbitts et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170104865 | Skelton | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170127255 | Archer et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170203767 | Tibbitts et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170310445 | Kalligudd | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180013873 | Farrell et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180124233 | Abramson et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190045048 | Li et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0955210 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0940051 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1931109 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2344971 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2362020 | Nov 2001 | GB |
H07245782 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H10200961 | Jul 1998 | JP |
H10256979 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H10294970 | Nov 1998 | JP |
H114190 | Jan 1999 | JP |
H1188954 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000349895 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2006304034 | Nov 2006 | JP |
20010097024 | Nov 2001 | KR |
9834412 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9955102 | Oct 1999 | WO |
2006070253 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2008109477 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advisement of Agreement to Arbitrate Claims and Stay Proceedings filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Jun. 22, 2016, 2 pages. |
Agreement to Arbitrate Claims filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Aug. 3, 2016, 4 pages. |
Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Respondent's Counterclaims dated Aug. 25, 2016, 4 PWs. |
Answer and Counterclaim dated Aug. 5, 2016, 6 pages. |
Answer of Katasi LLC's filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1: 12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 8, 2013, 3 pages. |
Civil Case Cover Sheet for initial Pleading of Complaint, Counterclaim, Cross-Claim or Third Patty Complaint filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Mar. 8, 2016, 2 pages. |
Civil Cover Sheet filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1: 16-cv-439 on Feb. 24, 2016, 2 pages. |
Civil Cover Sheet filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Dec. 19, 2012, 1 page. |
Complaint, filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Mar. 8, 2016, 21 pages. |
Complaint filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:16-CV-439 on Feb. 24, 2016, 21 pages. |
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Jury Demand filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Dec. 19, 2012,20 pages. |
Court's Inquiry Regarding Agreement to Arbitrate issued in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on. Aug. 2, 2016, 1 page. |
Defendant Katasi, LLC's Corporate Disclosure Statement filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Apr. 18, 2013, 2 pages. |
Defendant Obdedge, LLC Cellcontrol's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint with Proposed Order filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 9, 2013, 3 pages. |
Defendant Obdedge, LLC, d/b/a Cellcontrol's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint with Proposed Order filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 23, 2013, 3 pages. |
Defendant Obdedge, LLC's Notice of Related Cases filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Apr. 18, 2013, 2 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 20765664.6, dated Sep. 30, 2022, 11 pages. |
Fetter J.G., et al., Digital Cellular Telephone Interaction with implantable Cardioverter—Defibrillators, JACC, Mar. 1998, vol. 31 (3), pp. 623-628. |
Hahn R. W., et al., “The Economics of Regulating Cellular Phones in Vehicles,” Working paper from AEI-Brookings Joint. Center for Regulatory Studies, Oct. 1999, pp. 1-44. |
International Preliminary Report on Patenability for Application No. PCT/US11/57357 dated Mar. 6, 2014, 16 pages. |
International Preliminary' Report on Patentability for international (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/042793, dated Feb. 2, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in international Application No. PCT/US2020/021017, dated Jun. 9, 2020. 9 pages. |
International Search Report for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCTUS2010/042793, dated Sep. 10, 2010. |
International Search report in International Application No. PCT/US2001/029618, dated Feb. 13, 2002, 2 pages. |
Joint Motion to Vacate and Re-set Date for Scheduling Conference and Date for Filing of Proposed Scheduling Order with Proposed Order filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 24, 2013, 5 pages. |
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 31, 2013, 17 pages. |
Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint Pursuant to D.C. Colo.LCiVR 6.1 (A) filed in U.S. District. Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Mar. 26, 2013, 2 pages. |
Madden S., Telematics in Auto Insurance, Cambridge Mobile Telematics, 2019, pp. 1-35. |
Mayhew D.M, Multi-Rate Sensor Fusion for GPS Navigation Using Kalman Filtering, Thesis, May 1999, pp. 1-125. |
Microstrain, DVRT Microminiature Displacement Sensors Little Sensors, Big ideas, Version 10.04b, 2000, 1 page. |
Minute Order Granting Joint Motion to Vacate and Re-set Date for Scheduling Conference and Date for Filing of Proposed Scheduling Order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 28, 2013, 1 page. |
Minute Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1: 12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Apr. 22, 2013, 1 page. |
Minute Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on May 10, 2013, 1 page. |
Minute Order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Apr. 22, 2013, 1 page. |
Minute Order re: Preliminary Scheduling Conference issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Jan. 2, 2013, 9 pages. |
Minute Order Resetting Scheduling Conference issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Mar. 12. 2013,1 page. |
Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings with Proposed Order filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on May 3, 2016, 6 pages. |
Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado , Case No. 1 16-cV-439 on Mar. 7, 2016, 1 page. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,698, dated Nov. 22, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,077, dated Feb. 11, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,077, dated Oct. 31, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/386,643, dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,748, dated Mar. 1, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,698, dated May 16, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/336,282, dated May 11, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,500, dated Sep. 25. 2018. |
Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim dated Jul. 15, 2016, 19 pages. |
Notice of Entry of Appearance of Jeff Massey Au filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:16-cv-439 on Feb. 24, 2016, 2 pages. |
Notice of Entry of Appearance of Yiu Au filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:16-cv-439 on Feb. 24, 2016, 1 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,698, dated Jul. 28, 2015. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,077, dated May 3, 2012. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/386,643, dated Apr. 12, 2013. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,748, dated Dec. 23, 2013. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,748, dated Dec. 26, 2014. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,748, dated Jul. 24, 2015. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,698, dated Dec. 4, 2015. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/336,282, dated Sep. 28, 2015. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,500, dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,500, dated Jul. 11, 2016. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,500, dated Jul. 17, 2017. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,500, dated Mar. 27, 2018. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,286, dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,286, dated Jan. 20, 2017. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,286, dated Jun. 15, 2018. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,286, dated Oct. 11, 2017. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,784, dated Apr. 20, 2017. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,784, dated Dec. 18, 2017. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/477,536, dated Aug. 27, 2018. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/477,536, dated Dec. 8, 2017. |
Order Granting Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration issued, in District Court; Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Jun. 18, 2016, 2 pages. |
Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond issued in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on May 4, 2016, 1 page. |
Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration issued in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on May 23, 2016,4 pages. |
Order re: Court's Review of Advisement of Agreement to Arbitrate Claims and Stay Proceedings issued in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Jun. 23, 2016, 3 pages. |
Order to Show Cause Issued by United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1: 16-cv-439 on Feb. 26, 2016, 3 pages. |
Plaintiff Aegis Mobility, inc.s Corporate Disclosure Statement filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1 12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM on Dec. 19, 2012, 1 page. |
Plaintiffs Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration with Proposed Order filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Jun. 15, 2016, 4 pages. |
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Dec. 20, 2012, 3 pages. |
Report on the Filing or Determination, of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM. on Dec. 19, 2012, 1 page. |
Return of Service of Summons, Civil Case, Cover Sheet, Complaint, and Exhibit A on Joe Breaux of Defendant Obdedge, LLC on Apr. 4, 2016, filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Apr. 14, 2016, 1 page. |
Summons in a Civil Action issued to Katasi, LLC in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Dec. 19, 2012, 1 page. |
Summons in a Civil Action issued to obdEDGE, LLC in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Dec. 19, 2012, 2 pages. |
Summons to Obdedge, LLC d/b/a Cellcontrol filed in United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:16-cv-439 on Feb. 24, 2016, 2 pages. |
Summons to Obdedge, LLC d/b/a Cellcontrol issued by District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on Mar. 8, 2016, 2 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,077, dated Dec. 2, 2012. |
Tibbitts., et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/386,643, filed Jan. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/104,171, filed Oct. 9, 2008, Curry et al. |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Apr. 18, 2013, 5 pages. |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint with Proposed Order filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 1:12-CV-03306-PAB-KLM, on Apr. 18, 2013, 5 pages. |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration with Proposed Order filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on May 20, 2016,4 pages. |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond with Proposed Order filed in District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2016CV30261 on May 3, 2016, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,698, filed Dec. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,784, filed Aug. 10, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/104,171, inventor Curry, filed Oct. 9, 2008. |
Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/042793, dated Sep. 10, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230113971 A1 | Apr 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61267064 | Dec 2009 | US | |
61227404 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17833265 | Jun 2022 | US |
Child | 18080260 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16236436 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 17833265 | US | |
Parent | 15233784 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 16236436 | US | |
Parent | 14336282 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15233784 | US | |
Parent | 13386643 | US | |
Child | 14336282 | US |