The present disclosure relates, generally, to power converters for converting direct current (DC) power to alternating current (AC) power and, more particularly, to devices, systems, and methods for converting DC power to AC power suitable for supplying energy to an AC grid and/or an AC load.
Power inverters convert a DC power to an AC power. For example, some power inverters are configured to convert the DC power to an AC power suitable for supplying energy to an AC grid and, in some cases, an AC load coupled to the AC grid. One particular application for such power inverters is the conversion of DC power generated by an alternative energy source, such as photovoltaic cells (“PV cells” or “solar cells”), fuel cells, DC wind turbine, DC water turbine, and other DC power sources, to a single-phase AC power for delivery to the AC grid at the grid frequency.
In photovoltaic applications, the power delivered by each photovoltaic cell may vary in magnitude over time due to temporal variations in operating conditions including changes in sunlight intensity, angle of incidence of sunlight, ambient temperature and other factors. As such, photovoltaic cells have an operating point at which the values of the current and voltage of the cell result in an ideal or “maximum” power output. This “maximum power point” (“MPP”) is a function of environmental variables, including light intensity and temperature. Inverters for photovoltaic systems may include some form of maximum power point tracking (“MPPT”) as a mechanism of identifying and tracking the maximum power point (“MPP”) and adjusting the inverter to exploit the full power capacity of the cell at the MPP.
Additionally, in a typical photovoltaic power system, an inverter may be associated with one or more solar cell panels. For example, some systems include strings of solar cell panels that deliver a relatively high, combined voltage (e.g., nominal 450 V) to a single, large inverter. Alternatively, in other systems such as a distributed photovoltaic power system, an inverter may be associated with each solar cell panel. In such systems, the solar cell panels are typically small, relatively low voltage (e.g., 25 V). The inverter may be placed in close proximity to the associated solar cell panel to increase the conversion efficiency of the overall system.
Typical photovoltaic inverters include an inverter circuit for converting DC power to AC power and a controller for controlling the functionality of the inverter circuit. Some inverter circuits include an input stage and an output stage. Typical inverter controllers are embodied as single stage controllers. That is, a single inverter controller controls both the input stage and the output stage of the inverter circuit.
According to one aspect, a method for controlling a multi-stage inverter for converting direct current (DC) power from a DC source to alternating current (AC) power may include controlling operation of an input converter of the multi-stage inverter with a input controller and controlling operation of an output converter of the multi-stage inverter with an output controller that is separate and galvanically isolated from the input controller. The method may also include transmitting data signals between the input controller and the output controller over a DC bus of the multi-stage inverter.
In some embodiments, controlling operation of the input converter may include controlling the input converter to draw a maximum amount of power from a photovoltaic (PV) module. Additionally, controlling operation of the input converter may include sensing a magnitude of a current output and a voltage output of the DC source. In such embodiments, the method may include generating a current command signal based on the magnitude of the current output and the voltage output of the DC source. Additionally, in some embodiments, the method may include sensing a magnitude of a bus voltage of a DC bus electrically connected between input converter and the output converter. In such embodiments, the method may further include generating a plurality of switching signals for an inverter circuit of the input controller based on the magnitude of the current output, the voltage output, and the bus voltage.
In some embodiments, the method may also include controlling the operation of the input converter with the input controller to convert an input DC waveform to an output DC waveform, supplying the output DC waveform to a DC bus, and controlling the operation of the output converter with the output controller to converter the output DC waveform to an AC waveform. Additionally, the method may include supplying power to the input controller from the DC source.
Additionally, in some embodiments, the method may controlling the operation of the output converter to convert a DC waveform to an AC waveform suitable for delivery to an AC grid and supplying power to the output converter from the AC grid. The method may also include sensing a magnitude of a bus voltage of a DC bus electrically connected between input converter and the output converter and generating a plurality of switching signals for an inverter circuit of the output controller based on the magnitude of the bus voltage and an average power bus voltage value. Additionally, the method may include transmitting data from the output controller to a remote device over an AC power line.
According to another aspect, an inverter for converting direct current (DC) power from a DC source to alternating current (AC) power may include an input converter, and output converter, and input controller, and an output controller. The input converter may be electrically coupled to a power bus and configured to convert an input DC waveform to a bus waveform supplied to the power bus based on a first plurality of switching signals. The output converter may be electrically coupled to the power bus and configured to convert the bus waveform to an output AC waveform based on a second plurality of switching signals. The input controller may be electrically coupled to the input converter and may include (i) first sensing circuitry to sense a magnitude of an output voltage of the DC source, a magnitude of an output current of the DC source, and a magnitude of a bus voltage of the power bus and (ii) a first control module configured to generate the first plurality of switching signals based on the magnitude of the output voltage, the output current, and the bus voltage. The output controller may be electrically coupled to the output converter and galvanically isolated from the input controller. The output controller may include (i) second sensing circuitry to sense a magnitude of the bus voltage of the power bus (ii) a second control module configured to generate the second plurality of switching signals based on the magnitude of the bus voltage and an average power bus voltage value.
In some embodiments, the input controller and output controller may include communication circuitry configured to communicate data between the input controller and output controller over the power bus. Additionally, in some embodiments, the input controller may include an internal power supply configured to generate power for the input controller based on a power signal received from the DC source. Additionally or alternatively, the output controller further comprises an internal power supply configured to generate power for the output controller based on a power signal received from an AC grid. The output controller may also include a power line communication circuit configured to communicate with a remote device over an AC power line in some embodiments.
According to a further aspect, a method for controlling a multi-stage inverter for converting direct current (DC) power from a DC source to alternating current (AC) power, the multi-stage inverter including a DC bus, may include controlling operation of an input converter of the multi-stage inverter electrically coupled to the DC bus with a input controller, controlling operation of an output converter of the multi-stage inverter electrically coupled to the DC bus with an output controller that is galvanically isolated from the input controller, and communicating data from the input controller to the output controller over the DC bus.
In some embodiments, the method may include modulating a bus voltage of the DC bus to communicate the data from the input controller to the output controller. Additionally, in some embodiments, the method may include transmitting data from output controller to a remote device over an AC power line.
a-7c are simplified schematics of embodiments of sensing circuits of the input controller of
a-18c are simplified schematics of embodiments of sensing circuits of the output controller of
While the concepts of the present disclosure are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific exemplary embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the concepts of the present disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
References in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to effect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
Some embodiments of the disclosure, or portions thereof, may be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. Embodiments of the disclosure may also be implemented as instructions stored on a tangible, machine-readable medium, which may be read and executed by one or more processors. A machine-readable medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computing device). For example, a machine-readable medium may include read only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; and others.
Referring now to
The inverter 106 is electrically connected to the DC source 104 and configured to convert a DC waveform generated by the DC source 104 to an AC waveform suitable for delivery to the AC grid 102 and, in some embodiments, loads coupled to the AC grid 102. The AC grid 102 may be embodied as, for example, a utility power grid that supplies utility AC power to residential and commercial users. Such utility power grids may be characterized as having an essentially sinusoidal bipolar voltage at a fixed grid frequency (e.g., f=ω/2π=50 Hz or 60 Hz).
As discussed above, in some embodiments, the DC source 104 may be embodied as one or more photovoltaic cells. In such embodiments, the DC source 104 and the inverter 106 may be associated with each other so as to embody an AC photovoltaic module (ACPV) 200 as illustrated in
Referring now to
Because the controllers 302, 322 are separated and isolated from each other as discussed above, the controllers 302, 322 may be incapable of direct communications between each other. That is, the controllers 302, 322 may be incapable of directly communicating from one controller 302, 322 to the other controller 302, 322 without the use of intervening devices or circuitry. However, in some embodiments as discussed below, the controllers 302, 322 may be configured to communicate with each over the power bus 310. For example, the input controller 332 may be configured to modulate data onto the waveform of the power bus 310, which is subsequently demodulated by the output controller 322.
Additionally, in some embodiments, the inverter 106 may include communication circuitry 324. The communication circuitry 324 may be communicatively coupled to the output controller 322 or may be incorporated therein in some embodiments. The output controller 322 may utilize the communication circuitry 324 to communicate with remote devices, such as remote controllers or servers. In one particular embodiment, the communication circuitry 324 is embodied as a power line communication circuit configured to communicate with remote devices over an AC power line, such as the AC power line interconnects coupled to the output of the output converter 320. However, in other embodiments, other communication technologies and/or protocols may be used. For example, in some embodiments, the communication circuitry 324 may be embodied as a wireless or wired communication circuit configured to communicate with remote devices utilizing one or more wireless or wired communication technologies and/or protocols such as Wi-Fi™, Zigbee®, ModBus®, WiMAX, Wireless USB, Bluetooth®, TCP/IP, USB, CAN-bus, HomePNA™, and/or other wired or wireless communication technology and/or protocol.
In use, the input converter 300 of the inverter 106 is configured to be electrically coupled to the DC source 104 to receive a DC waveform therefrom. The input converter 300 converts the DC waveform to a bus waveform, which in the illustrative embodiment is a DC waveform but may be an AC waveform in other embodiments. Similarly, the output converter 320 is configured to be electrically coupled to the AC grid 102 and convert the bus waveform (i.e., either a DC waveform or an AC waveform) to the output AC waveform at the grid frequency for delivery to the AC grid 102.
As discussed above, the input controller 302 is electrically coupled to the input converter 300 and configured to control the operation of the input converter 300 to convert the input DC waveform from the DC source 104 to a bus waveform (e.g., a DC bus waveform) at the power bus 310. To do so, the input controller 302 may provide a plurality of switching and/or control signals to various circuits of the input converter 300 as described in more detail below. Additionally, as discussed below, the input controller 302 may control the operation of the input converter 300 based on a maximum power point tracking (“MPPT”) algorithm or methodology.
The output controller 322 is electrically coupled to the output converter 320 and configured to control the operation of the output converter 320 to convert the bus waveform to the output AC waveform suitable for delivery to the AC grid 102. In the illustrative embodiment as discussed in more detail below, the output controller 322 is configured to use a pulse width modulation algorithm to control the output converter 320 such that the output AC waveform is pulse width modulated. To do so, the output controller 322 may provide a plurality of switching and/or control signals to various circuits of the output converter 320 as described in more detail below.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The inverter circuit 404 is illustratively embodied as a bridge circuit formed by a plurality of switches 510, 512, 514, 516. Each of the switches 510, 512, 514, 516 are configured to receive a corresponding control signal, qIC1, qIC2, qIC3, qIC4, from the input controller 302 to control operation of the inverter circuit 404. As discussed below, the input controller 302 uses PWM to control the switches 510, 512, 514, 516 at a relatively high switching frequency (e.g., at a frequency that is substantially higher than the AC grid frequency). As discussed above, the inverter circuit 404 converts the DC waveform from the DC source 104 to a first AC waveform based on the switching signals received from the input controller 302. In the illustrative embodiment, the inverter circuit 404 is embodied as a full-bridge circuit. However, in other embodiments, the inverter circuit 404 may utilize other circuit topologies such as a half-bridge circuit, a push-pull circuit, a flyback circuit, and/or other DC-DC converter circuits may be used in other embodiments. Additionally, although each of the switches 510, 512, 514, 516 is illustrated as MOSFET devices, other types of switches may be used in other embodiments.
The illustrative transformer 406 includes a primary winding 520 electrically coupled to the inverter circuit 404 and a secondary winding 522 electrically coupled to the rectifier circuit 408. The transformer 406 provides galvanic isolation between the primary side converter circuitry (including DC source 104) and the secondary side circuitry (including power bus 310), as well as between the controllers 302, 322. The turns ratio of the transformer 406 may also provide voltage and current transformation between the first AC waveform at the primary winding 520 and the second AC waveform at the secondary winding 522.
The rectifier circuit 408 is electrically coupled to the secondary winding 522 of the transformer 406 and is configured to convert the second AC waveform supplied by the transformer 406 to a DC bus waveform supplied to the power bus 310. In the illustrative embodiment, the rectifier 408 is embodied as a full-bridge rectifier formed from a plurality of diodes 530, 532, 534, 536. Again, in other embodiments, other circuit topologies may be used in the rectifier circuit 408.
The power bus 310 is also shown in
Referring now to
The input controller 302 includes power circuitry 600, input sense circuitry 602, processing circuit 604, and memory 606. The input controller 302 includes an internal power supply embodied as the power circuitry 600. The power circuitry 600 provides power to the input controller 302 from the DC source 104. The power circuitry 600 may be embodied as any type of power supply circuitry. In the illustrative embodiment, the power circuitry 600 is embodied as a switching power supply powered by the DC source 104. For example, in one particular embodiment, the power circuitry 600 is embodied as step-down or “buck” DC-DC converter that receives power from the DC source 104 and generates the operating power for the various circuitry of the input controller 302. However, in other embodiments, other power supply circuits may be used such as, for example, a single-ended primary inductor converter (SEPIC). Of course, on initial power up, the input controller 302 may not be able to regulate its own power supply. As such, the power circuitry 600 may also include a start-up circuit to provide power from a linear regulator until the input controller 302 is fully “awake” and able to regulate its own power.
The input sense circuitry 602 includes a plurality of sensing circuits to sense various current and voltages of the inverter 106. In the illustrative embodiment, the input sense circuitry 602 is configured to sense the output voltage of the DC source 104, the output current of the DC source 104, and the voltage of the power bus 310. Of course, due to the isolation between the input converter 300 and the output converter 320, the sense circuitry 602 cannot directly sense or measure the voltage of the power bus 310. As such, the sense circuitry 602 is configured to sense indirectly the voltage of the power bus 310. Illustrative embodiments of the various sense circuits are illustrated in
A current sense circuit 710 for sensing the output current of the DC source 104 is illustrated in
A bus voltage sense circuit 720 for indirectly sensing the voltage of the power bus 310 is illustrated in
Referring back
The processing circuitry 604 includes a plurality of control modules, which may be embodied as firmware or software programs, discrete hardware circuitry, and/or a combination of hardware and software stored in, for example, the memory 606. In the illustrative embodiment, the processing circuitry 604 includes an internal power supply control module 610, an input switching frequency/communication module 612, an MPPT control module 614, and an input converter control module 616. Of course, it should be appreciated that additional or other modules, functionality, and features may be included in the processing circuitry 604 depending on the particular implementation.
The internal power supply control module 610 controls the functionality of the power circuitry 600, which provides power to the input controller 302. For example, in embodiments in which the power circuitry 600 is embodied as a switching power supply, the power supply control module 610 generates the switching signals for such switching power supply.
As discussed above, the input controller 302 and the output controller 322 may communicate with each other over the power bus 310 in some embodiments. In such embodiments, the input switching frequency/communication module 612 controls the switching frequency of the input converter 300 to modulate the voltage across the transformer 406, which is subsequently carried across the power bus 310 to the output controller 322. Typically, the voltage across the transformer 406 has an average value with some small variations. However, by further modulating the voltage across the transformer 406, data can be communicated from the input controller 302 to the output controller 322. Such data may include, for example, the output voltage, current, and/or power of the DC power source 104, voltages and currents of components of the input converter 300, error signals, and/or other data from the input controller 302 or the input converter 300. In such embodiments, the use of direct communication (e.g., via a digital isolation channel) between the input controller 302 and the output controller 322 is not needed. One illustrative method for communicating across an isolation barrier is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/832,199, entitled “Method for Communicating Across an Isolation Barrier in Power Converters,” by Patrick Chapman, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Further, it should be appreciated that in other embodiments, the communication module 612 may be embodied as a wireless communication device configured to communicate with a corresponding communication module of the output controller 322. In such embodiments, the communication module 612 may utilize any suitable wireless communication technology such as, for example, Wi-Fi™, Zigbee®, WiMAX, Wireless USB, Bluetooth®, and/or other wireless communication technology and/or protocol.
The MPPT module 614 provides maximum power point tracking of the DC power source 104. Specifically, the MPPT module 614 monitors the power output of the DC power source 104 (e.g., a PV module) and generates a current command based on an MPPT algorithm. For example, as discussed above, photovoltaic cells have an operating point at which the values of the current and voltage of the cell result in an ideal or “maximum” power output, which is a function of environmental variables, including light intensity and temperature. As such, the MPPT module 614 attempts to maximize the power output of the DC source 104 during most operating conditions. Of course, it should be appreciated that under some operating conditions, such as at start-up or shut-down or during a rapid change in available sunlight, the MPPT module 614 and/or inverter 106 may actively or passively extract less than the maximum power from the DC source 104.
The input converter control module 616 controls the inverter circuit 404 and performs various voltage checks to ensure proper operation of the inverter 106. To do so, the input converter control module 616 generates a duty cycle command signal and a switching period command signal, which are loaded into associated pulse width modulation (PWM) circuitry to generate the switching signals that are supplied to the input inverter circuit 404. Additionally, as discussed in more detail below in regard to
Referring now to
In block 804, the input controller 302 generates internal power supply control signals to the power circuitry 600. To do so, the input controller 302 may execute a method 900 for controlling the power supply circuitry 600 as shown in
D—GD=V—GD_star/v—PV_sense
wherein D_GD is the requested duty cycle, V_GD_star is the gate-drive voltage command, and v_PV_sense is the sensed output voltage of the DC power source 104. Additionally, in some embodiments, the duty cycle, D_GD, may also include a feedback term to improve the control of the duty cycle. After the requested duty cycle has been calculated, the duty cycle and switching period are loaded into the power supply PWM timers to generate the switching signals for the power supply circuitry 600.
Referring back to
Referring back to
In block 1106, a sample count is incremented and, in block 1108, it is determined whether the sample count is equal to a predetermined threshold. If so, the method 1100 advances to block 1110 in which it is determined whether the currently calculated average power, P_avg, is less than the most previously calculated average power, P_avg_prev. If so, the method 1100 advances to block 1112 in which a requested change in the MPP current command, delta_i, is set to the negative value of the current requested change in MPP current command value. However, if the calculated average power, P_avg, is not less than the most previously calculated average power, P_avg_prev, the method 1100 advances to block 114 in which it is determined whether the calculated average power, P_avg, is greater than a predetermined maximum average power, P_max. If so, the method 1100 advances to block 1116 in which the requested change in MPP current command, delta_i, is set to the negative value of the absolute value of the current change in MPP current command value. Subsequently, in block 1118, the MPP current command, i_MPP, is set. Illustratively, the current command, i_MPP, is set to the sum of the current i_MPP value and the change in the current command value, delta_i. In block 1120, the sample count is reset to zero. Additionally, in block 1122 the previous average power variable, P_avg_prev, is set to the currently calculated average power, P_avg. In this way, the method 1100 determines a current command value, i_MPP, to achieve the maximum or near maximum power output of the DC source 104.
Referring back to
i_in_star=i—MPP*(v—PV_sense−v—PV_min)/(v—MPP_min−v—PV_min)
wherein i_in_star is the current command, i_MPP is the MPP current command, v_PV_sense is the sensed voltage of the DC source 104, v_PV_min is the minimum DC source 104 voltage threshold, and v_MPP_min is the minimum MPP voltage threshold. Additionally, the MPP current command is set to zero in block 1208 after calculation of the current command, i_in_star.
In block 1210, it is determined whether the sensed bus voltage of the power bus 310 is outside a predetermined bus voltage maximum, v_bus_max, and bus voltage minimum, v_bus_min. If not, an inverter enable variable, input_enable, is set to TRUE in block 1212. However, if the sensed bus voltage falls outside the predetermined thresholds, the method 1200 advances to block 1214 in which the input enable variable, input_enable, is set to FALSE. Subsequently, in block 1216, it is determined whether the input converter has been enabled or disabled based on the state of the input enable variable, input_enable. If the input enable variable has been set to FALSE, the inverter is turned off in block 1218 by setting the requested duty cycle, d, to zero in block 1218. Additionally, a previous current error variable, i_in_error_prev, is set to zero in block 1218. However, if the input enable variable has been set to TRUE, the method 1200 advances to block 1210 in which the current command error, i_in_error, and the requested duty cycle, d, are set. The current command error, i_in_error is set to the difference of the current command, i_in_star, and the sensed output current of the DC source 104, i_in_sense. Additionally, the duty cycle is calculated according to the following algorithm:
d=K—p*(i_in_error−i_in_error_prev)+K—i*(i_in_error+i_in_error_prev)*T—s/2+d_prev
in which K_p and K_i are gain constants, i_in_error is the current command error, i_in_error_prev is the previous-most current command error, T_s is the switching period, and d_prev is the previous-most calculated duty cycle.
After the duty cycle, d, has been set in block 1220, the method 1200 advances to block 1222 in which it is determined whether the requested duty cycle, d, is greater than a predetermined maximum duty cycle, d_max. If so, the method 1200 advances to block 1224 in which the duty cycle, d, is set to a the predetermined maximum duty cycle, d_max. In block 1226, it is determined whether the duty cycle, d, is less than a minimum duty cycle, d_min. If so, the method 1200 advances to block 1228 in which the duty cycle, d, is set to the minimum duty cycle, d_min. Subsequently, in block 1230, the previous duty cycle variable, d_prev, is set to the current requested duty cycle, d, and the previous current error variable, i_in_error_prev, is set to the current error, i_in_error.
Referring back to
The digital representation of the sensed voltage and current of the DC source 104, v_PV_sense and i_in_sense, are provided to the MPPT module 614 of the processing circuitry 604. As discussed above, the MPPT module 614 generates an MPP current command, i_MPP, based on the sensed voltage and current signals. The MPP current command, i_MPP, and the digital representations of the sensed voltage and current of the DC source 104, v_PV_sense and i_in_sense, and the sensed bus voltage of the power bus 310 are provided to the input converter control module 616 of the processing circuitry 604. As discussed above, the input converter control module 616 generates a duty cycle, d, a switching period, T_S, and a clock pulse width command, rec_width, which may be simply assigned by the processing circuitry 604. The command signals generated by the input converter control module 616 are provided to an input converter control PWM module 1304, which generates the switching signals, qIC1, qIC2, qIC3, qIC4, to the inverter circuit 404 and the switching signal, qIC5, to the active voltage clamp 402. Of course, as discussed above, the processing circuitry 604 may include additional or other modules in other embodiments based on, for example, the particular implementation.
Referring now to
Referring now to
One embodiment of the output converter 320 is illustrated in
The EMI filter 1502 is configured to filter the output voltage by reducing the conducted interference, reducing current ripple, and satisfying regulatory requirements. In the illustrative embodiment, the filter 1502 includes differential-mode inductors 1610, 1612 and a line filter capacitor 1614. The output converter 320 also includes an output current sense resistor 1616.
Referring now to
The output sense circuitry 1702 includes a plurality of sensing circuits to sense various current and voltages of the inverter 106. In the illustrative embodiment, the output sense circuitry 1702 is configured to sense the bus voltage of the power bus 310, the line voltages and current of the AC grid 102, and a temperature of the inverter 106. Illustrative embodiments of the various sense circuits are illustrated in
A current sense circuit 1820 for sensing the output current of the inverter 106 is illustrated in
Referring back
The processing circuitry 1704 includes a plurality of control modules, which may be embodied as firmware or software programs, discrete hardware circuitry including both digital and analog circuitry (e.g., comparators, operational amplifiers, etc.), and/or a combination of hardware and software stored in, for example, the memory 1706. In the illustrative embodiment, the processing circuitry 1704 includes a frequency calculation module 1710, an average output power module 1712, an RMS calculation module 1714, a phase-lock-loop (PLL) module 1716, a fault monitoring module 1718, a regulatory enforcement module 1720, an output converter control module 1722, a bus voltage controller module 1724, and a demodulation communication module 1726.
The frequency calculation module 1710 is configured to determine the frequency of the AC grid 102. To do so, the frequency calculation module 1710 may receive an output of the PLL module 1716, which is configured to lock onto the frequency of the AC grid 102. The average output power module 1712 and the RMS calculation module 1714 are configured to determine parameters of the output power of the inverter 106. Specifically, the average output power module 1712 determines the average output power of the inverter 106 and the RMS calculation module 1714 determines the RMS output power of the inverter 106 based on the sensed output voltage and current values of the inverter 106. The fault monitoring module 1718 monitors the operations of the inverter 106 for faults. For example, the fault monitoring module 1718 ensures that the parameters of the inverter 106 are within predefined thresholds. Additionally, the fault monitoring module 1718 may include island detection functionality, overheating detection (e.g., via use of the temperature sensor 1832), and/or the like.
The regulatory enforcement module 1720 ensures the inverter 106 is operating within the parameters defined by particular power regulatory guidelines. One embodiment of the regulatory enforcement module 1720 is illustrated in
Referring now back to
Referring back to
Referring back to
Certain embodiments of the present disclosure have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, any of a wide variety of known non-resonant and resonant switching power converter topologies may be used in place of the specific converter embodiments described herein. The unipolar input source may be a fuel cell or another kind of DC source. The inverter controller may comprise elements for regulatory and safety monitoring and control (e.g., circuits or processes for disabling the inverter in the event of AC grid fault or input source fault, islanding protection). Switches in power converters are shown to be MOSFETs and to comprise diodes across their terminals. It is understood that other types of switches may be used (e.g., bipolar transistors, IGBTs) and that diodes may be intrinsic to the semiconductor switch or may be discrete devices. Switches may also be provided with passive or active snubbers to prevent losses and/or to limit voltage or current stresses.
There is a plurality of advantages of the present disclosure arising from the various features of the apparatuses, circuits, and methods described herein. It will be noted that alternative embodiments of the apparatuses, circuits, and methods of the present disclosure may not include all of the features described yet still benefit from at least some of the advantages of such features. Those of ordinary skill in the art may readily devise their own implementations of the apparatuses, circuits, and methods that incorporate one or more of the features of the present disclosure and fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3670230 | Rooney et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
4114048 | Hull | Sep 1978 | A |
4217633 | Evans | Aug 1980 | A |
4277692 | Small | Jul 1981 | A |
4287465 | Godard et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4651265 | Stacey et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661758 | Whittaker | Apr 1987 | A |
4707774 | Kajita | Nov 1987 | A |
4709318 | Gephart et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4719550 | Powell et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4725740 | Nakata | Feb 1988 | A |
5041959 | Walker | Aug 1991 | A |
5148043 | Hirata et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160851 | McAndrews | Nov 1992 | A |
5191519 | Kawakami | Mar 1993 | A |
5309073 | Kaneko et al. | May 1994 | A |
5343380 | Champlin | Aug 1994 | A |
5473528 | Hirata | Dec 1995 | A |
5625539 | Nakata et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5668464 | Krein | Sep 1997 | A |
5684385 | Guyonneau et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5721481 | Narita et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5745356 | Tassitino | Apr 1998 | A |
5796182 | Martin | Aug 1998 | A |
5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5848101 | Taylor | Dec 1998 | A |
5886890 | Ishida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5929537 | Glennon | Jul 1999 | A |
5978236 | Faberman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982645 | Levran et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6046402 | More | Apr 2000 | A |
6154379 | Okita | Nov 2000 | A |
6157168 | Malik | Dec 2000 | A |
6180868 | Yoshino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201180 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201319 | Simonelli et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225708 | Furukawa | May 2001 | B1 |
6268559 | Yamawaki | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268735 | Craig et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285572 | Onizuka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291764 | Ishida et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311279 | Nguyen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6356471 | Fang | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369461 | Jungreis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381157 | Jensen | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6445089 | Okui | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462507 | Fisher | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6489755 | Boudreaux et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6563234 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563718 | Li et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6605881 | Takehara et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614132 | Hockney et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624533 | Swanson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657321 | Sinha | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700802 | Ulinski et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727602 | Olson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6750391 | Bower et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765315 | Hammerstrom | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770984 | Pai | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795322 | Aihara et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6838611 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847196 | Garabandic | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6881509 | Jungreis | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882063 | Droppo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6950323 | Achleitner | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7031176 | Kotsopoulos et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072195 | Xu | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091707 | Cutler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116114 | Kajita | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7193872 | Siri | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7233130 | Kay | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7289341 | Hesterman | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7319313 | Dickerson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324361 | Siri | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339287 | Jepsen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7365998 | Kumar | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7405494 | Tassitino, Jr. et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7420354 | Cutler | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432691 | Cutler | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7463500 | West | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479774 | Wai et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7502697 | Holmquist et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521914 | Dickerson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531993 | Udrea et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7551460 | Lalithambika et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577005 | Angerer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7592789 | Jain | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609040 | Jain | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7626834 | Chisenga et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638899 | Tracy et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646116 | Batarseh et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660139 | Garabandic | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667610 | Thompson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7710752 | West | May 2010 | B2 |
7733679 | Luger et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768155 | Fornage | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796412 | Fornage | Sep 2010 | B2 |
RE41965 | West | Nov 2010 | E |
7839022 | Wolfs | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855906 | Klodowski et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
RE42039 | West et al. | Jan 2011 | E |
7899632 | Fornage et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916505 | Fornage | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8085564 | Klodowski et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010043050 | Fisher | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020017822 | Umemura et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020196026 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050213272 | Kobayashi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050275386 | Jepsen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060067137 | Udrea | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083039 | Oliveira | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070040539 | Cutler | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040540 | Cutler | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070133241 | Mumtaz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070221267 | Fornage | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080055952 | Chisenga et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078436 | Nachamkin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106921 | Dickerson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080203397 | Amaratunga et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080266922 | Mumtaz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272279 | Thompson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283118 | Rotzoll et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285317 | Rotzoll | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080304296 | NadimpalliRaju et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000654 | Rotzoll et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020151 | Fornage | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090066357 | Fornage | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079383 | Fornage et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080226 | Fornage | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084426 | Fornage et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090086514 | Fornage et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097283 | Krein et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090147554 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090184695 | Mocarski | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090200994 | Fornage | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225574 | Fornage | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230782 | Fornage | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242272 | Little et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243587 | Fornage | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090244929 | Fornage | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090244939 | Fornage | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090244947 | Fornage | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296348 | Russell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100085035 | Fornage | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088052 | Yin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091532 | Fornage | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106438 | Fornage | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109597 | Steiner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118983 | Weber et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118985 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100139945 | Dargatz | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175338 | Garcia Cors | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176771 | Fieldhouse et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181830 | Fornage et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195357 | Fornage et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214808 | Rodriguez | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222933 | Smith et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236612 | Khajehoddin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263704 | Fornage et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100283325 | Marcianesi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309695 | Fornage | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327659 | Lisi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012429 | Fornage | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019444 | Dargatz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026281 | Chapman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110026282 | Chapman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043160 | Serban | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049990 | Amaratunga et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110051820 | Fornage | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058398 | Agbossou et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110130889 | Khajehoddin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2353422 | Mar 2004 | CA |
2655007 | Aug 2010 | CA |
2693737 | Aug 2010 | CA |
20012131 | Mar 2001 | DE |
1794799 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1803161 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1837985 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2419968 | May 2006 | GB |
2421847 | Jul 2006 | GB |
2439648 | Jan 2008 | GB |
2434490 | Apr 2009 | GB |
2454389 | May 2009 | GB |
2455753 | Jun 2009 | GB |
2455755 | Jun 2009 | GB |
1021582 | Apr 2004 | NL |
1021591 | Apr 2004 | NL |
WO 2004008619 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004100348 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004100348 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006048688 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007080429 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2009081205 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009081205 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009134756 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kutkut, “PV Energy Conversion and System Integration,” Florida Energy Systems Consortium, 2009, 24 pages. |
Kwon et al., “High-efficiency Module-integrated Photovoltaic Power Conditioning System,” IET Power Electronics, doi: 10.1049/iet-pel. 2008.0023, 2008. |
Lohner et al., “A New Panel-integratable Inverter Concept for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE ISIE '96, vol. 2, pp. 827-831, 1996. |
Martins et al., “Analysis of Utility Interactive Photovoltaic Generation System Using a Single Power Static Inverter,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 1719-1722, 2000. |
Martins et al., “Interconnection of a Photovoltaic Panels Array to a Single-Phase Utility Line From a Static Conversion System,” Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf., pp. 1207-1211, 2000. |
Martens et al., “Usage of the Solar Energy from the Photovoltaic Panels for the Generation of Electrical Energy,” The 21st International Telecommunication Energy Conference, 6 pages, 1999. |
Matsui et al, “A New Maximum Photovoltaic Power Tracking Control Scheme Based on Power Equilibrium at DC Link,” Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Thirty-Fourth IAS Annual Meeting, vol. 2, pp. 804-809, 1999. |
Meinhardt et al., “Miniaturised ‘low profile’ Module Integrated Converter for Photovoltaic Applications with Integrated Magnetic Components,” IEEE APEC '99, vol. 1, pp. 305-311, 1999. |
Meza et al., “Boost-Buck Inverter Variable Structure Control for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1318-1321, 2005. |
Midya et al., “Dual Switched Mode Power Converter,” 15th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 1, pp. 155-158, Mar. 1989. |
Midya et al., “Sensorless Current Mode Control—An Observer-Based Technique for DC-DC Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 522-526, Jul. 2001. |
Nikraz et al., “Digital Control of a Voltage Source Inverter in Photovoltaic Applications,” 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 3266-3271, 2004. |
Oldenkamp et al., “AC Modules: Past, Present and Future, Workshop Installing the Solar Solution,” Jan. 1998, Hatfield, UK, 6 pages. |
Pajic et al., “Unity Power Factor Compensation for Burst Modulated Loads,” IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, vol. 2, pp. 1274-1277, 2003. |
Ramos et al., “A Fixed-Frequency Quasi-Sliding Control Algorithm: Application to Power Inverters Design by Means of FPGA Implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 344-355, Jan. 2003. |
Rodriguez et al., “Analytic Solution to the Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Problem,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 2054-2060, Sep. 2007. |
Rodriguez et al., “Dynamic Stability of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems,” Power Engineering Society General Meeting, vol. 2, pp. 2193-2199, 2004. |
Rodriguez et al., “Long-Lifetime Power Inverter for Photovoltaic AC Modules,” IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 2593-2601, Jul. 2008. |
Ropp et al., “Determining the Relative Effectiveness of Islanding Detection Methods Using Phase Criteria and Nondetection Zones,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 290-296, Sep. 2000. |
Russell et al., “SunSine300 AC Module, Annual Report Jul. 25, 1995-Dec. 31, 1996,” NREL/SR-520-23432, UC Category 1280, 1997, 31 pages. |
Schmidt et al., “Control of an Optimized Converter for Modular Solar Power Generation,” 20th International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, vol. 1, pp. 479-484, 1994. |
Schutten et al., “Characteristics of Load Resonant Converters Operated in a High-Power Factor Mode,” IEEE, Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 5-16, 1991. |
Sen et al., “A New DC-TO-AC Inverter With Dynamic Robust Performance,” 1998 IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Global Connectivity in Energy, Computer, Communication and Control, vol. 2, pp. 387-390, 1998. |
Shimizu et al., “Flyback-Type Single-Phase Utility Interactive Inverter with Power Pulsation Decoupling on the DC Input for an AC Photovoltaic Module System,” IEEE, Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 1264-1272, Sep. 2006. |
Singh et al., “Comparison of PI, VSC and Energy Balance Controller for Single Phase Active Filter Control,” 1998 IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Global Connectivity in Energy, Computer, Communication and Control, vol. 2, pp. 607-614, 1998. |
Strong et al., “Development of Standardized, Low-Cost AC PV Systems—Phase I Annual Report,” NREL/SR-520-23002, Jun. 1997, 18 pages. |
Strong et al., “Development of Standardized, Low-Cost AC PV Systems—Final Technical Report,” NREL/SR-520-26084, Feb. 1999, 27 pages. |
Sung et al., “Novel Concept of a PV Power Generation System Adding the Function of Shunt Active Filter,” 2002 Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia Pacific, vol. 3, pp. 1658-1663, 2002. |
Takahashi et al., “Development of Long Life Three Phase Uninterruptible Power Supply Using Flywheel Energy Storage Unit,” Proc. Int'l. Conf. Power Electronics, vol. 1, pp. 559-564, 1996. |
Takahashi et al., “Electrolytic Capacitor-Less PWM Inverter”, in Proceedings of the IPEC '90, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 131-138, Apr. 2-6, 1990. |
Thomas et al., “Design and Performance of Active Power Filters,” IEEE IAS Magazine, 9 pages, 1998. |
Tian, “Solar-Based Single-Stage High-Efficiency Grid-Connected Inverter,” Masters Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 83 pages, 2005. |
Vezzini et al., “Potential for Optimisation of DC-DC Converters for Renewable Energy by use of High Bandgap Diodes,” 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 5, 3836-3842, 2004. |
Wada et al., “Reduction Methods of Conducted EMI Noise on Parallel Operation for AC Module Inverters,” 2007 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 3016-3021, Jun. 2007. |
Wu et al., “A Single-Phase Inverter System for PV Power Injection and Active Power Filtering With Nonlinear Inductor Consideration,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 1075-1083, 2005. |
Wu, et al., “A 1φ 3W Grid-Connection PV Power Inverter with APF Based on Nonlinear Programming and FZPD Algorithm,” Eighteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, APEC '03, vol. 1, pp. 546-5552, 2003. |
Wu, et al., “A 1φ 3W Grid-Connection PV Power Inverter with Partial Active Power Filter,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 635-646, Apr. 2003. |
Wu, et al., “PV Power Injection and Active Power Filtering With Amplitude-Clamping and Amplitude-Scaling Algorithms,” IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 731-741, 2007. |
Xue et al., “Topologies of Single-Phase Inverters for Small Distributed Power Generators: An Overview,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 1305-1314, 2004. |
Ando et al., “Development of Single Phase UPS Having AC Chopper and Active Filter Ability,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 10.1109/ICIT.2006.372445, pp. 1498-1503, 2006. |
Biel et al., “Sliding-Mode Control Design of a Boost-Buck Switching Converter for AC Signal Generation,” vol. 51, issue 8, pp. 1539-1551, 2004. |
Biel et al., “Sliding-Mode Control of a Single-Phase AC/DC/AC Converter,” Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1., pp. 903-907, Dec. 2001. |
Bose et al., “Electrolytic Capacitor Elimination in Power Electronic System by High Frequency Filter,” Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, vol. 1, pp. 869-878, 1991. |
Bower et al., “Innovative PV Micro-inverter Topology Eliminates Electrolytic Capacitors for Longer Lifetime,” Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, vol. 2, pp. 2038-2041, May 2006. |
Bower, “The AC PV Building Block-Ultimate Plug-n-Play That Brings Photovoltaics Directly to the Customer,” Proceedings of the National Center for Photovoltaics (NCPV) and Solar Program Review Meeting, pp. 311-314, May 2003. |
Brekken et al., “Utility-Connected Power Converter for Maximizing Power Transfer From a Photovoltaic Source While Drawing Ripple-Free Current,” 2002 IEEE 33rd Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1518-1522, 2002. |
Brekken, “Utility-Connected Power Converter for Maximizing Power Transfer From a Photovoltaic Source,” Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota, Jun. 2002, 56 pages. |
Bush, “UK Solar Firm Discloses Novel Inverter Topology,” ElectronicsWeekly.com. Apr. 2011, last accessed Aug. 30, 2011 at http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2011/04/26/50953/UK-solar-firm-discloses-novel-inverter-topology.htm. |
Chang et al., “The Impact of Switching Strategies on Power Quality for Integral Cycle Controllers,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 1073-1078, Jul. 2003. |
Chisenga, “Development of a Low Power Photovoltaic Inverter for Connection to the Utility Grid,” PhD Thesis, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, 173 pages, 2007. |
Di Napoli et al., “Multiple-Input DC-DC Power Converter for Power-Flow Management in Hybrid Vehicles,” Conference Rec. IEEE Industrial Applications Soc. Annual Meeting, pp. 1578-1585, 2002. |
Edelmoser, “Improved 2kw Solar Inverter With Wide Input Voltage Range,” IEEE 10th Mediterranean Conference, MEIeCon 2000, vol. 2, pp. 810-813, 2000. |
Enphase Energy, “Application Note: Multi-Tenant Design Guidelines,” rev. 1, 5 pages, 2008. |
Enphase Energy, “Enphase Field Wiring Diagram—M190 & M210 Microinverters—240v, Single Phase,” Drawing No. 144-00001, rev. 6, 1 page, 2009. |
Enphase Energy, “Enphase Micro-Inverter Technical Data,” Doc. No. 142-00004, rev. 2, 2 pages, 2008. |
Esram et al., “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 439-449, Jun. 2007. |
Henze et al., “A Novel AC Module with High-Voltage Panels in CIS Technology,” 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, ISBN 3-936338-24-8, 8 pages, Sep. 2008. |
Hu et al., “Efficiency Improvement of Grid-tied Inverters at Low Input Power Using Pulse Skipping Control Strategy,” Twenty-Fifth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 627-633, Feb. 2010. |
Hung et al., “Analysis and Implementation of a Delay-compensated Deadbeat Current Controller for Solar Inverters,” IEEE Proceedings—Circuits, Devices and Systems, pp. 279-286, 2001. |
Itoh et al., “Ripple Current Reduction of a Fuel Cell for a Single-Phase Isolated Converter using a DC Active Filter with a Center Tap,” Twenty-Fourth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, APEC '09, pp. 1813-1818, 2009. |
Jantsch et al., “AC PV Module Inverters With Full Sine Wave Burst Operation Mode for Improved Efficiency of Grid Connected Systems at Low Irradiance,” Proceedings of the 14th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 5 pages, 1997. |
Jeong et al., “An Improved Method for Anti-Islanding by Reactive Power Control,” pp. 965-970, 2005. |
Jung et al., “A Feedback Linearizing Control Scheme for a PWM Converter-Inverter Having a Very Small DC-Link Capacitor,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 35., issue 5, pp. 1124-1131, 1999. |
Jung et al., “High-frequency DC Link Inverter For Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 1410-1413, 2002. |
Kern, “SunSine300: Manufacture of an AC Photovoltaic Module, Final Report, Phases I & II, Jul. 25, 1995-Jun. 30, 1998,” NREL/SR-520-26085, 1999, 32 pages. |
Khajehoddin et al., “A Nonlinear Approach to Control Instantaneous Power for Single-phased Grid-connected Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp. 2206-2212, 2009. |
Khajehoddin et al., “A Novel Topology and Control Strategy for Maximum Power Point Trackers and Multi-string Grid-connected PV Inverters,” Applied Power Electronics Conference, APEC08, pp. 173-178, 2008. |
Khajehoddin et al., “A Robust Power Decoupler and Maximum Power Point Tracker Topology for a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System,” IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, PESC08, pp. 66-69, 2008. |
Km et al., “New Control Scheme for AC-DC-AC Converter Without DC Link Electrolytic Capacitor,” 24th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, PESC '93 Record., pp. 300-306, 1993. |
Kitano et al., “Power Sensor-less MPPT Control Scheme Utilizing Power Balance at DC Link—System Design to Ensure Stability and Response,” The 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 2, pp. 1309-1314, 2001. |
Kjaer et al., “A Novel Single-Stage Inverter for the AC-module with Reduced Low-Frequency Ripple Penetration,” EPE 2003, ISBN 90-75815-07-7, 10 pages, 2003. |
Kjaer et al., “A Review of Single-phase Grid-connected Inverters for Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Trans on Power Electronics, vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1292-1306, 2005. |
Kjaer et al., “Design Optimization of a Single Phase Inverter for Photovoltaic Applications,” IEEE 34th Annual Power Electronics Specialist Conference, PESC '03, vol. 3, pp. 1183-1190, 2003. |
Kjaer et al., “Power Inverter Topologies for Photovoltaic Modules—A Review,” Conf. record of the 37th Industry Applications Conference, vol. 2, pp. 782-788, 2002. |
Kjaer, “Design and Control of an Inverter for Photovoltaic Applications,” PhD Thesis, Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology, 236 pages, 2005. |
Kjaer, “Selection of Topologies for the PHOTOENERGY™ Project,” Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology, 37 pages, 2002. |
Kotsopoulos et al., “A Predictive Control Scheme for DC Voltage and AC Current in Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Inverters with Minimum DC Link Capacitance,” The 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 3, pp. 1994-1999, 2001. |
Kotsopoulos et al., “Predictive DC Voltage Control of Single-Phase PV Inverters with Small DC Link Capacitance,” 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, vol. 2, pp. 793-797, 2003. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/035392, dated Jul. 24, 2012, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110261601 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |