This invention relates to the control of a wind turbine to reduce nacelle vibration.
Wind turbines as known in the art comprise a tower supporting a nacelle and a rotor with a number of pitch-adjustable rotor blades. Such wind turbines are prone to vibrations since they comprise a large mass positioned at the end of a slender tower. For this reason, a key requirement for controlling the vibrational behaviour of such wind turbines is to prevent any exciting rotor forces, produced from imbalances in the rotor, from resonating with the natural bending frequencies of the tower. Preventing any critical exciting rotor forces from coinciding with the natural bending frequencies of the tower imposes frequency constraints on the design of wind turbines.
It is against this background that the invention has been devised.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of controlling a wind turbine comprising a tower supporting a rotor comprising a plurality of pitch-adjustable rotor blades, the method comprising: obtaining a movement signal indicative of a vibrational movement of the tower; determining an actuator signal based on the movement signal, the actuator signal being determined to produce a desired force to counteract the vibrational movement of the tower; determining a pitch reference offset signal for each one of the plurality of pitch-adjustable rotor blades based on the actuator signal: applying an integration of the pitch reference offset signals; determining modified pitch reference offset signals based on the integrated pitch reference offset signals; and, determining a pitch signal for each one of the plurality of pitch-adjustable rotor blades based on the modified pitch reference offset signals, the pitch signals being arranged to adjust the pitch-adjustable rotor blades to provide the force that counteracts the vibrational movement of the tower.
Preferably, the method further comprising applying an adjustment gain to the pitch reference offset signals and determining the modified pitch reference offset signals based on the integrated pitch reference offset signals and the gain adjusted pitch reference offset signals.
Preferably, the method further comprises obtaining a velocity signal based on the movement signal, the velocity signal indicative of a velocity of the top of the tower during the vibrational movement of the tower; determining a second signal based on the velocity signal; applying an adjustment gain to the second signal; and, determining the actuator signal based on the gain adjusted first signal and the gain adjusted second signal.
Preferably, the method further comprises obtaining a position signal based on the movement signal, the position signal indicative of a position of the top of the tower during the vibrational movement of the tower; determining a first signal based on the position signal; applying an adjustment gain to the first signal; and, determining the actuator signal based on the gain adjusted first signal.
Preferably, the movement signal comprises an acceleration signal, and the method further comprises obtaining the velocity signal as an estimated velocity signal by applying a first integration of the acceleration signal; and, obtaining the position signal as an estimated position signal by applying a second integration of the velocity signal.
Preferably, the actuator signal is determined in a non-rotating reference frame, and the method further comprises transforming the actuator signal from the non-rotating reference frame to a rotating reference frame to determine the pitch reference offset signals.
Preferably, the method further comprises determining a collective pitch reference signal for the pitch-adjustable rotor blades, the collective pitch reference signal being determined based on a rotor speed, wherein the pitch signals are determined based on a combined signal of the modified pitch reference offset signals and the collective pitch reference signal.
Preferably, the collective pitch reference is determined by feedback control based on minimising a speed error between the rotor speed and a reference rotor speed.
Preferably, the method further comprises determining an excitation frequency affecting the tower, wherein the adjustment gain is defined by a separation between the excitation frequency and a tower vibration frequency.
Preferably, the adjustment gain further comprises a gain scheduling term, the gain scheduling term being dependent on an operational point of the wind turbine.
Preferably, the direction of the vibrational movement of the tower is a lateral direction or a torsional direction.
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a controller for a wind turbine control system comprising a processor and a memory module, wherein the memory module comprises a set of program code instructions which when executed by the processor implement a method according to the first aspect of the invention.
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a wind turbine comprising a tower supporting a rotor comprising a plurality of pitch-adjustable rotor blades and a controller according to the second aspect of the invention.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided a computer program product downloadable from a communication network and/or stored on a machine readable medium comprising program code instructions for implementing a method according to the first aspect of the invention.
The above and other aspects of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the drawings, like features are denoted by like reference signs.
With reference to
The generator 26 and the power converter system 28 may, as an example, be based on a full-scale converter (FSC) architecture or a doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) architecture, although other architectures would be known to the skilled person.
In the illustrated embodiment, the power output of the power converter system 28 is transmitted to a load 30, which may be an electrical grid. The skilled person would be aware that different power conversion and transmission options exist.
The wind turbine 10 further comprises a control means 32 that is operable to monitor the operation of the wind turbine 10 and to issue commands thereto to achieve a set of control objectives. The control means 32 is shown in
The control means 32 comprises a processor 34 configured to execute instructions that are stored in and read from a memory module 36 and/or an external data store that forms part of an external network 38. Measurement data may also be stored in the memory module 36, and recalled in order to execute processes according to the instructions being carried out by the processor 34.
Instructions and data may also be received from external controllers or sensors that form part of the external network 38, and recorded data and/or alerts may be issued over the external network 38 to be stored/displayed at an external source for analysis and remote monitoring.
In addition, the processor 34 is in communication with a plurality of sensors 40 that are disposed within the wind turbine 10. For example, as shown in
The control means 32 of the wind turbine 10 also includes at least one control unit 50.
Four control units are shown in the configuration shown in
A network 58 forms a central connection between each of the modules (according to a suitable protocol), allowing the relevant commands and data to be exchanged between each of the modules accordingly. However, it will be appreciated that suitable cabling may be provided to interconnect the units. It will also be appreciated that the wind turbine 10 could include more control units 50, and that
A principal function of the control means 32 is to control power generation of the wind turbine 10 so that it optimises power production under current ambient wind conditions and in accordance with demanded power generation by a transmission grid operator. However, in addition to its main power control tasks, the control means 32 may be operable to perform a suite of safety and diagnostic monitoring functions, and carry out corrective action, if necessary. In the embodiments of the invention, one of these functions is to prevent any exciting forces of the rotor 16 from resonating with the bending frequencies of the tower 12. A rotor can experience exciting forces with its rotational frequency from asymmetries or imbalances in the rotor. For example, asymmetries in the rotor may come about due to geometric errors in or misalignment of the rotor blades, giving rise to aerodynamic asymmetries. Any mass imbalances in the rotor 16 will also give rise to exciting rotor forces.
In general, due to the vibrational coupling between the rotor 16 and the tower 12, such exciting rotor forces can bring about at least two vibrational modes in the tower 12, one in a lateral direction and another in a torsional direction. A third vibrational mode can give rise to a vibration in the fore-aft directions. A vibration in a lateral direction is sometimes referred to as a side-side vibration. Aspects of this vibration is schematically illustrated in
In practice, lateral and torsional vibrations are not distinct vibrational modes. That is to say, a lateral vibration may also cause a torsional vibration, and vice versa.
In an embodiment of the invention, the exciting forces experienced by the rotor 16 are compensated for, generally speaking, by determining pitch signals for individually adjusting the pitch of the pitch-adjustable rotor blades 18 to provide a force that dampens the movement of the nacelle 14, and so the tower 12. The cyclic pitch control unit 57 is configured to carry out this function and generally provides a closed-loop system in which the motion of the tower 12 is fed back to the pitch signals for determining the individual pitch settings. The blade pitch angle control unit 52 then applies the resulting pitch signals to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades 18.
The LVRT-pitch control block determines an actuator signal (θP) which is transformed in a transformation unit (TP) to pitch reference offset signals (θ1, θ2, θ3) for each of the rotor blades 18 so that resulting pitch signals (θA, θB, θC) can be applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades 18 individually. The pitch reference offset signals (θ1, θ2, θ3) are modified in a pitch reference offset control block (PRO) to obtain modified pitch reference offset signals (θmod1, θmod2, θmod3). Each individual pitch signal (θA, θB, θC) is based on the modified pitch reference offset signals (θmod1, θmod2, θmod3), and thereby on a combined signal of the collective pitch reference (θcol) and the first signal, or a combined signal of the collective pitch reference (θcol) and the first signal and the second signal as determined by the LTVR-pitch block.
The LTVR-pitch block determines a signal representing a desired force or torque in the direction of the movement of the nacelle 14. The transformation is to obtain resulting pitch contributions (θ1, θ2, θ3) for each of the pitch-adjustable rotor blades 18.
The transformation (TP) may be based on a multi-blade coordinate transformation of the Coleman transformation or Fourier coordinate transformation type, which is arranged to take a signal in a non-rotating reference frame, that is, the actuator signal (θP), and transform it to a resulting signal in the rotating frame, the pitch reference offset signals (θ1, θ2, θ3).
As an addition or as an alternative, the lateral tower vibration may also be reduced by using the power as actuator (LTVR-power), where a power actuation signal for reducing lateral tower vibrations by use of the power reference is being determined based on the first signal and optionally the second signal.
The LVRT-power control block determine a power reference offset (Poffset) to be combined with the power reference (P) to provide a resulting power reference signal (Pset). The resulting power reference signal (Pset) is determined based on a combined signal of the power reference (P) and the actuator signal (Poffset), and thereby on the first signal, or a combined signal of the power reference (P) and the first signal and the second signal. The resulting power reference signal (Pset) is applied to the electrical generator 26. Embodiments of the first and second signals are illustrated in
As an addition or as an alternative, also the torsional tower vibration may also be reduced by using the pitch as actuator (LTVR-torsion), where pitch actuation signals for reducing torsion tower vibrations is being determined based on the first signal and optionally the second signal.
The LVRT-torsion control block determines an actuator signal (θT) which is transformed in a transformation unit (TT) to pitch reference offset signals (θT1, θT2, θT3) for each of the rotor blades 18 so that resulting pitch signals (θA, θB, θC) can be applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades 18 individually. The pitch reference offset signals (θT1, θT2, θT3) are modified in the pitch reference offset control block (PRO) to obtain modified pitch reference offset signals (θmodT1, θmodT2, θmodT3). Each individual blade actuation signal (θA, θB, θC) being based on the modified pitch reference offset signals (θmodT1, θmodT2, θmodT3), and thereby on a combined signal of the collective pitch reference (θcol) and the first signal, or a combined signal of the collective pitch reference (θcol) and the first signal and the second signal as determined by the LTVR-torsion block. Embodiments of the first and second signals are illustrated in
The LTVR-torsion block corresponds to the LTVR-pitch block, and the transformation (TT) is similar to the transformation (TP), except that the specific implementation is made for torsional movement.
Moreover, vibration reduction in the fore-aft direction may also be target by imposing a vibration reduction pitch offset signal onto the collective pitch reference (θcol). This pitch offset signal may be determined in a fore-aft vibration reduction block (FAVR), to provide a reduction of the vibration, or damping of the nacelle movement, in the fore-aft direction.
The collective pitch reference (θcol) is determined by a speed controller in view of the rotor speed and optionally also further sensor values, referred to in
In
The acceleration signal (a) may be used as a raw signal however, typically the signal is pre-processed, as indicated by “PP” in the figure. Such pre-processing may be the application of an anti-aliasing filter to remove any high frequency content that is not needed for further use. Other filters, including other band-pass filters, may be applied during the pre-processing.
The acceleration signal (a), or the pre-processed version of the signal, is further processed by the application of a series of filters. In the illustrated embodiment, an estimated position signal (x or x′), indicative of a positon of the top of the tower 12 in the relevant direction is obtained by applying in series a first integration (F1) of the acceleration signal to obtain an estimated velocity signal (v or v′), and a second integration (F2) of the estimated velocity signal to obtain the estimated position signal (x or x′). In this case, the estimated velocity signal (v or v′) is indicative of a velocity of the top of the tower 12 during the vibrational movement of the tower 12. In general, any suitable filters which integrate the input signal can be applied. In an embodiment, the first and second integrations may be implemented as leaky integrators. The leaky integrators can be implemented as 1st order low pass filters tuned with a break frequency below the 1st for-aft mode frequency, the frequency being the system frequency comprising the tower 12, rotor 16, nacelle 14, and, optionally, also a foundation.
The first signal to the actuator capable of reducing the nacelle 14 vibration in the relevant direction (pitch or power) may be determined as the estimated position signal (x) multiplied with a first gain (G1).
In an embodiment, the speed signal indicative of a speed of a movement of the top of the tower 12 in the relevant direction may be obtained as the estimated velocity signal (v) which results after the first integration (F1).
The second signal may be determined as the estimated velocity signal (v) multiplied with a second gain (G2).
In this embodiment, the resulting signal is sum of the first (position) and second (velocity) signals. As described, the invention may in an embodiment implemented using the first signal only. In such an embodiment, this may be obtained by setting the second gain (G2) to zero.
In a further embodiment, also illustrated in
The adjustment gain is applied to the first signal (G1), and optionally the second signal (G2), in order to gain adjust the first signal, and optionally the second signal, prior to applying the pitch signals (θA, θB, θC) to an actuator of the wind turbine 10 capable of reducing nacelle 14 vibration in the direction of the movement of the nacelle 14. In this regard, the tower vibration frequency of a tower vibration eigenmode or a first natural bending frequency is determined, and a rotor frequency corresponding to the rotor speed is determined. Based on these values, the adjustment gain is determined by a separation between the rotor frequency and tower vibration frequency.
The adjustment gains (G1, G2) are set to zero for rotor frequencies below and above predetermined thresholds below and above the 1st eigenmode respectively. The adjustment gains (G1, G2) then increase as the rotor frequencies cross the thresholds and approach the 1st eigenmode. In this embodiment, the increasing adjustment gain may be a piecewise linear function. However, this function may be defined in accordance with any function with a functional dependency upon the rotor speed which express that the adjustment gains (G1, G2) are determined by a separation between the excitation frequency and tower vibration frequency.
In embodiments, the separation between the excitation frequency and tower vibration frequency is based on a difference between the excitation frequency and tower vibration frequency or on a ratio between the excitation frequency and tower vibration frequency.
In an embodiment, the adjustment gains (G1, G2) may be gain scheduled by including into the adjustment gain a gain scheduling term being dependent upon an operational point of the wind turbine 10. For example, the gain adjustment term may be multiplied by a factor which increases with increasing acceleration in the lateral direction.
The impact of any asymmetries and/or mass imbalances in the rotor 16 can be represented as an external force disturbance (dX) acting on the top of the tower 12 as the rotor 16 rotates. The amplitude and phase of the disturbance (dX) are determined from the magnitude of the asymmetries and mass imbalances. Assuming that the speed or frequency (ωr) of the rotor 16 is constant, the disturbance (dX) appears as a sinusoidal 1P disturbance. That is to say, the frequency of excitation of the rotor 16 due to the disturbance occurs once per revolution of the rotor 16.
The response of the cyclic pitch control unit 57 to any asymmetries and/or mass imbalances in the rotor 16 can be evaluated as a transfer function from the disturbance (dX), as an input, to the velocity (vX) of the top of the tower 12 at the frequency (ωr) of the rotor 16, as an output. Considering the transfer function as a sensitivity function, a performance metric can be formulated as follows:
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention has been described by way of example only, and that a variety of alternative approaches may be adopted without departing from the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PA 2018 70303 | May 2018 | DK | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK2019/050146 | 5/8/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/219137 | 11/21/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11215163 | Caponetti | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20080206051 | Wakasa | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100111693 | Wilson | May 2010 | A1 |
20130230396 | Wakasa et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20160356266 | Koerber | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160377057 | Caponetti et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180017042 | Baun et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201470481 | Aug 2015 | DK |
2963283 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2019042515 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019219137 | Nov 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Danish Patent and Trademark Office Search Report for Application No. PA 2018 70303 dated Feb. 27, 2019. |
Danish Patent and Trademark Office 1st Technical Examination for Application No. PA 2018 70303 dated Mar. 1, 2019. |
PCT International Search Report for Application PCT/US2019/050146 dated Dec. 8, 2019. |
Van Solingen E et al: “Control Design for a two-bladed downwind teeterless damped free-yaw wind turbine,” Mechatronics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, GB, vol. 36, May 8, 2016, pp. 77-96. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/DK2019/050146 dated Dec. 8, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210207584 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |