Method and system for controlling the duty cycle of a clock signal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6781419
  • Patent Number
    6,781,419
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 13, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A system for controlling the duty cycle of a clock signal. The system includes a duty cycle adjustment circuit that receives an input clock signal and generates an output clock signal. The duty cycle adjustment circuit charges a capacitor when the input clock signal has a first logic level and discharges the capacitor with the input clock signal has a second logic level. The rates of charge and discharge are controlled by first and second control signals. When the capacitor has been charged to a first transition level, the output clock signal transitions to a first logic level, and when the capacitor has been discharged to a second transition level, the output clock signal transitions to a second logic level. The first and second control signals are supplied by a feedback circuit, which is implemented using an integrator circuit that receives the output clock signal and generates a feedback signal indicative of the duty cycle of the output clock signal. A transconductance amplifier compares the feedback signal to a reference voltage, and generates first and second currents corresponding thereto. These currents are converted to the first and second control signals by a control circuit, which includes a current mirror. The control circuit provides good immunity from power supply fluctuations.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates to clock signal circuits, and more particularly to a method and system for controlling the duty cycle of an output clock signal independently of the duty cycle of an input clock signal.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Clock signals are commonly used for a variety of purposes in digital systems, such as memory devices. For example, in a synchronous dynamic random access memory (“SDRAM”), a clock signal is used to determine the time at which control, data and address signals applied to the SDRAM are considered valid. The control, data and address signals are then latched into the SDRAM responsive to a transition of the clock signal.




In some cases, the duty cycle of the clock signal is not critical. For example, if the clock signal is used to latch a memory control signal once for each period of the clock signal, the control signal will be latched at the proper time regardless of whether the clock signal has a 50% duty cycle. However, controlling the duty cycle is critical in other applications. For example, in “double data rate” DRAMs, control, data and/or address signals are latched on each transition of the clock signal, i.e., on both the rising and falling edges of the clock signals. If the clock signal does not have a 50% duty cycle, the latching of the signals will not be symmetrical, and the clock signal may therefore fail to properly latch the signals.




The duty cycle of a clock signal can become skewed, i.e., vary from a 50% duty cycle, for a variety of reasons. For example, the clock signal may be coupled through a switching circuit that changes state when the clock signal has a predetermined voltage relative to the power supply voltage. In such case, power supply noise can momentarily increase or decrease the supply voltage, thereby altering the time at which the clock signal transitions. The duty of the clock signal can then vary from cycle-to-cycle. In other cases, the components used in a circuit having a symmetrical topography do not have the same electrical characteristics, thus causing them to operate differently. For example, a first transistor used in the circuit may have a resistance or threshold voltage that is different from the resistance or threshold voltage of a second transistor used in the circuit. In such cases, the duty cycle will be constant from cycle-to-cycle, but the duty cycle will vary from 50%.




There is therefore a need for a system and method for controlling the duty cycle of a clock signal in a manner that is not affected by variations in power supply voltage or electrical characteristics of circuit components, so that a clock signal having a duty cycle of 50% or some other value can be generated.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A method and system for generating an output clock signal having a controllable duty cycle from an input clock signal in accordance with the invention includes a duty cycle corrector circuit coupled to a duty cycle indicating circuit through a control circuit. The duty cycle corrector circuit is structured to transition the output clock signal to a first logic level responsive to a first transition of the input clock signal after a first delay that corresponds to a first control signal. The duty cycle corrector circuit is also structured to further transition the output clock signal to a second logic level that is different from the first logic level responsive to a second transition of the input clock signal that is different from the first transition of the input clock signal after a second delay that corresponds to a second control signal. The duty cycle indicating circuit is coupled to receive the output clock signal, and it generates a duty cycle feedback signal corresponding to the duty cycle of the output clock signal. The control circuit is structured to generate the first and second control signals as a function of the duty cycle feedback signal so that the first and second delays are selected to cause the output clock signal to have a predetermined duty cycle.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a block diagram of a system for controlling the duty cycle of a clock signal according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic of a duty cycle adjusting circuit according to an embodiment of the invention that is used in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

are timing diagrams showing the waveforms present in the duty cycle adjusting circuit of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

is a schematic of an integrator circuit according to an embodiment of the invention that is used in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 5

is a schematic of a transconductance amplifier according to an embodiment of the invention that is used in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 6

is a schematic of a current mirror circuit according to an embodiment of the invention that is used in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 7

is a block diagram of an embodiment of a synchronous dynamic random access memory containing a system for controlling the duty cycle of a clock signal in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 8

is a block diagram of a computer system using the SDRAM of

FIG. 7

including the duty cycle correction system of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of a system


10


for controlling the duty cycle of a clock signal in accordance with the invention is illustrated in FIG.


1


. The system


10


includes a duty cycle adjustment circuit


12


that receives a clock signal CLK-IN and outputs a corresponding duty cycle adjusted output signal CLK-OUT. The adjustment circuit


12


also receives a pair of control signals V


P


, V


N


from a control circuit


14


. As explained in greater detail below, the control signals V


P


, V


N


control the duration that the CLK-OUT signal is at two respective logic levels in order to control the duty cycle of the output signal CLK-OUT.




The control circuit


14


generates the control signals V


P


, V


N


responsive to a pair of output signals I


1


, I


2


from a transconductance amplifier


16


. The current of the output signals I


1


, I


2


produced by the transconductance amplifier is a function of the difference between a reference voltage V


REF


and the magnitude of a feedback signal V


F


from the output of an integrator


18


. As explained in greater detail below, the feedback signal V


F


from the integrator


18


is a function of the percent of time that the output signal CLK-OUT is at each of two logic levels, i.e., the duty cycle. An increase in the duty cycle, i.e., the time the output signal CLK-OUT is at a first logic level relative to the time that it is at a second logic level, causes the magnitude of the feedback signal V


F


to increase. Conversely, a decrease in the duty cycle causes the magnitude of the feedback signal V


F


to decrease.




The overall operation of the system


12


of

FIG. 1

will now be explained. The duty cycle adjustment circuit


12


outputs the CLK-OUT signal responsive to the CLK-IN signal. The integrator


18


receives the CLK-OUT signal and outputs the feedback signal V


F


as a function of the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal. The transconductance amplifier


16


generates the output signals I


1


, I


2


in a manner causing that the sum of the current of output signals I


1


, I


2


to be constant. However, the difference between current of output signals I


1


, I


2


is a function of the difference between the magnitude of the feedback signal V


F


and the magnitude of the reference voltage V


REF


. As mentioned above, the output signals I


1


, I


2


cause the control circuit


14


to output corresponding control signals V


P


, V


N


, which control the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT output signal. As explained in greater detail below, the system


10


is substantially insensitive to variations in the magnitude of its power supply voltages, thus making the system less susceptible to noise jitter.




Although, the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal will generally be controlled so that it is substantially 50%, it will be understood that the system


10


is capable of setting the duty cycle to other values simply by varying the ratio Ip/In, as explained below with respect to

FIG. 4

magnitude of the reference voltage V


REF


. The system


10


will automatically adjust the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal so that the magnitude of the feedback signal V


F


from the integrator


18


approximately equals the magnitude of the reference voltage V


REF


.




One embodiment of the duty cycle adjustment circuit


12


of

FIG. 1

is shown in FIG.


2


. The adjustment circuit


12


includes a series of two PMOS transistors


20


,


22


and two NMOS transistors


30


,


32


coupled between a supply voltage V


CC


and ground. The gates of one of the PMOS transistors


20


and one of the NMOS transistors


30


are coupled to each other to receive the CLK-IN signal. As a result, the PMOS transistor


20


and the NMOS transistor


30


essentially function together as an inverter so that an output node


38


is coupled to ground when the CLK-IN signal is high and is coupled to the supply voltage V


CC


when the CLK-IN signal is low.




The impedance between the supply voltage V


CC


and the output node


38


is controlled by adjusting the level of the control signal V


P


applied to the gate of the PMOS transistor


22


. Similarly, the impedance between the output node


38


and ground is controlled by adjusting the level of the control signal V


N


applied to the gate of the NMOS transistor


32


.




The output node


38


is coupled to a capacitor


40


and to an input of an inverter


42


. Therefore, when the PMOS transistor


20


is turned ON responsive to the CLK-IN signal being low, the capacitor


40


charges through the PMOS transistors


20


,


22


. Similarly, when the NMOS transistor


30


is turned ON responsive to the CLK-IN signal being high, the capacitor


40


discharges through the NMOS transistors


30


,


32


. The rate at which the capacitor


40


is charged and discharged is determined by the magnitude of the control signals V


P


and V


N


, respectively. When the capacitor


40


has been charged to a high transition voltage of the inverter


42


, the output of the inverter transitions low. When the capacitor


40


has been discharged to a low transition voltage of the inverter


42


, the output of the inverter transitions high. The output of the inverter


42


is coupled through a second inverter


44


, which functions as a buffer, to generate the output signal CLK-OUT.




The duty cycle adjustment circuit


12


also includes a positive feedback PMOS transistor


46


and a positive feedback NMOS transistor


48


. When the capacitor


40


has been discharged to the low transition voltage, the output of the inverter


42


transitions high, thereby turning ON the NMOS transistor


48


. The ON impedance of the transistor


48


is substantially lower than the impedance of the NMOS transistor


32


. As a result, turning the transistor


48


ON causes a substantial decrease in the impedance between the output node


38


and ground, thereby quickly discharging the capacitor


40


. Similarly, when the capacitor


40


has been charged to the high transition voltage, the output of the inverter


42


transitions low, thereby turning ON the PMOS transistor


46


. The ON impedance of the transistor


46


is substantially lower than the impedance of the PMOS transistor


22


. As a result, turning the transistor


46


ON causes a substantial decrease in the impedance between the supply voltage V


CC


and the output node


38


, thereby quickly charging the capacitor


40


. The positive feedback transistors


46


,


48


ensure that the capacitor


40


is always charged from ground potential each time the CLK-IN transitions low, and is always discharged from ground potential each time the CLK-IN transitions high. The resulting repeatability of the charge and discharge cycles ensures that the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal is accurately controlled by the control signals V


P


and V


N


.




The operation of the duty cycle adjustment circuit


12


will now be summarized with reference to the timing diagram of FIG.


3


. As shown therein, the CLK-IN signal has a duty cycle that is substantially greater than 50%. When the CLK-IN signal transitions high at time 815 ns, the NMOS transistor


30


turns ON, thereby discharging the capacitor


40


through the NMOS transistors


30


,


32


. At time 832 ns, when the voltage V


C


on the capacitor


40


has been discharged to the lower transition voltage of the inverter


42


, the output of the inverter


42


transitions high, thereby causing the CLK-OUT signal to transition low, as shown in FIG.


3


. The low-to-high transition of the inverter


42


output also turns ON the NMOS positive feedback transistor


48


, thereby quickly discharging the capacitor


40


. As a result, the voltage V


C


on the capacitor


40


reaches ground potential and is maintained there well before the CLK-IN signal transitions low at time 850 ns.




When the CLK-IN signal transitions low at time 850 ns, the PMOS transistor


20


turns ON, thereby charging the capacitor


40


through the PMOS transistors


20


,


22


. At time 857 ns, when the voltage V


C


on the capacitor


40


has been charged to the higher transition voltage of the inverter


42


, the output of the inverter


42


transitions low, thereby causing the CLK-OUT signal to transition high. The PMOS positive feedback transistor


46


is also turned ON at this time, thereby quickly charging the capacitor


40


. As a result, the voltage V


C


on the capacitor


40


reaches the supply voltage V


CC


and is maintained there until the CLK-IN signal transitions high at time 865 ns.




Notice that the capacitor


40


is discharged at a rate that is substantially slower than the rate at which the capacitor


40


is charged. As a result, the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal is maintained at 50%. The charge and discharge rates are adjusted in this manner by the magnitudes of the control voltages V


P


and V


N


, which control the impedance of the transistors


22


,


32


, respectively. As explained above, the negative feedback of the system


10


automatically adjusts the magnitudes of the V


P


and V


N


signals in this manner.




One embodiment of the integrator


18


is shown in FIG.


4


. The integrator


18


includes an inverter


50


formed by a PMOS transistor


52


coupled in series with an NMOS transistor


54


, with the gates of the transistors


52


,


54


coupled to each other. The transistors


50


,


52


are coupled in series with a current source


56


and a current sink


58


between a supply voltage V


CC


and ground. An output node


60


of the inverter


50


is coupled to a capacitor


62


to supply the feedback voltage V


F


.




In operation, when the CLK-OUT signal is low, the NMOS transistor


54


is turned OFF and the PMOS transistor


52


is turned ON to couple the current source


56


to the capacitor


62


. The capacitor


62


is then charged linearly toward V


CC


. When the CLK-OUT signal is high, the PMOS transistor


52


is turned OFF and the NMOS transistor


54


is turned ON to couple the capacitor


62


to the current sink


58


. The capacitor


62


is then discharged linearly toward ground. If the currents Ip and In are equal, then V


F


will be constant only if the duty cycle is 50%. If the duty cycle is other than 50%, the signal V


F


will charge to adjust the voltages V


P


, V


N


(

FIG. 2

) until the duty cycle is 50%. Although one embodiment of the integrator


18


is shown in

FIG. 4

, will be understood that a variety of integrator designs, both linear in the non-linear, as well as other circuits may be used to provide a voltage indicative of the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal.




One embodiment of the transconductance amplifier


16


is shown in FIG.


5


. The transconductance amplifier


16


includes a pair of NMOS transistors


70


,


72


that have their drains connected to each other and to ground through a constant current sink


74


, which draws a constant current I


C


. The gate of the transistor


70


is coupled to receive the reference voltage V


REF


while the gate of the other transistor


72


is coupled to the integrator


18


(

FIGS. 1 and 4

) to receive the feedback voltage V


F


. Since the current sink


74


draws a constant current I


C


, the sum of the currents through the transistors


70


,


72


is constant. The transistors


72


thus passes a current I


1


while the transistor


70


passes a current I


C


−I


1


.




In operation, when the feedback voltage V


F


increases relative to the reference voltage V


REF


, the current I


1


passing through the transistors


72


increases while the current I


C


−I


1


passing through the transistors


70


decreases. Conversely, when the feedback voltage V


F


decreases relative to the reference voltage V


REF


, the current I


1


passing through the transistors


72


decreases while the current I


C


−I


1


passing through the transistors


70


increases. Since the magnitude of the feedback voltage V


F


is inversely proportional to the duty cycle, the magnitude of the current I


1


is inversely proportional to the duty cycle.




One embodiment of the control circuit


14


(

FIG. 1

) is illustrated in FIG.


6


. The control circuit


14


includes a first branch


80


and a second branch


82


. The first branch


80


includes a single PMOS transistor


86


having its source connected to the supply voltage V


CC


and its gate and drain coupled to each other and to the drain of the NMOS transistor


72


(

FIG. 5

) and the gate of the NMOS transistor


22


(FIG.


2


). The PMOS transistor


86


is thus connected as a diode so that the current I


1


flowing through the transistor is directly proportional (but not necessarily linearly proportional) to the voltage across the transistor


86


. As a result, the voltage V


P


is inversely proportional to the current I


1


. Since the current I


1


is inversely proportional to the duty cycle, the magnitude of the voltage V


P


is directly proportional to the duty cycle.




As the duty cycle increases, the increased magnitude of the voltage V


P


decreases the current charging the capacitor


40


(

FIG. 2

) thereby causing the input to the inverter


42


to increase to a voltage above the high transition voltage of the inverter


42


a later point in time. As a result, the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal is decreased. Conversely, as the duty cycle decreases, the decreased magnitude of the voltage V


P


increases the current charging the capacitor


40


(

FIG. 2

) thereby causing the input to the inverter


42


to increase to a voltage above the high transition voltage of the inverter


42


an earlier point in time. As a result, the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal is increased.




The second branch


82


includes a pair of PMOS transistors


90


,


92


having their gates coupled to each other and to the drain of the transistor


90


. The drain of the transistor


90


is also coupled to the drain of the NMOS transistor


70


(FIG.


5


). The transistors


90


,


92


operate as a current mirror in which the current I


C


−I


1


through the transistor


90


sets the source-to-drain voltage and the source-to-gate voltages of the transistor


90


. However, since the gate of the transistor


90


is also coupled to the gate of the transistor


92


, the current I


C


−I


1


also sets the source-to-gate voltage of the transistor


92


. Because both transistors


90


,


92


have the same source-to-gate voltage, the current through the transistor


92


is the same as the current through the transistor


90


, ie. I


C


−I


1


.




The current flowing through the transistor


92


passes through an NMOS transistor


96


, which has its gate and drain interconnected to form a diode. The voltage V


N


is thus proportional to the current I


C


−I


1


. Since the current I


1


is inversely proportional to the duty cycle, the current I


C


−I


1


through the transistor


92


is directly proportional to the duty cycle. Therefore, the magnitude of the voltage V


N


is directly (but not necessarily linearly) proportional to the duty cycle. As the duty cycle increases, the increased magnitude of the voltage V


N


increases the current discharging the capacitor


40


(

FIG. 2

) thereby causing the input to the inverter


42


to decrease to a voltage below the low transition voltage of the inverter


42


an earlier point in time. As a result, the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal is decreased. Conversely, as the duty cycle decreases, the decreased magnitude of the voltage V


N


decreases the current discharging the capacitor


40


(

FIG. 2

) thereby causing the input to the inverter


42


to decrease to a voltage below the low transition voltage of the inverter


42


a later point in time. As a result, the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal is increased.




In summary, an increase in the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal causes the integrator


18


(

FIG. 4

) to reduce the magnitude of the feedback voltage V


F


. The reduced magnitude of the feedback voltage V


F


causes the transconductance amplifier


16


(

FIG. 5

) to reduce the current I


1


and increase the current I


C


−I


1


. The reduced current I


1


causes the magnitude of the voltage V


P


to increase, and the increased current I


C


−I


1


causes the magnitude of the voltage V


N


to increase. With reference to

FIG. 2

, the increased magnitude of the voltages V


P


, V


N


decrease the charge rate and increase the discharge rate of the capacitor


40


. As a result, the percentage of time that the capacitor


40


remains discharged to a voltage below the high transition voltage of the inverter


42


increases. The duty cycle of the signal CLK-OUT is thus decreased.




A decrease in the duty cycle of the CLK-OUT signal causes the integrator


18


(

FIG. 4

) to increase the magnitude of the feedback voltage V


F


. The increased magnitude of the feedback voltage V


F


causes the transconductance amplifier


16


(

FIG. 5

) to increase the current I


1


and decrease the current I


C


−I


1


, thereby causing the magnitude of the voltages V


P


and V


N


to decrease. The increased magnitude of the voltages V


P


, V


N


increase the charge rate and decrease the discharge rate of the capacitor


40


. As a result, the percentage of time that the capacitor


40


remains charged to a voltage above the low transition voltage of the inverter


42


increases. The duty cycle of the signal CLK-OUT is thus increased.




An advantageous property of the control circuit


14


operating combination with the duty cycle adjustment circuit


12


is its good immunity from variations in the power supply voltage V


CC


or ground potential. With reference to

FIGS. 2 and 4

, the magnitude of the control signal V


P


is equal to the power supply voltage V


CC


less the threshold voltage of the transistor


86


. Although, as explained above, the threshold voltage is a function of the current I


1


, variations in the supply voltage V


CC


are coupled to directly to the gate of the PMOS transistor


22


(FIG.


2


). However, when the transistor


20


is turned ON, the voltage on the source at the transistor


22


is equal to the supply voltage V


CC


. Therefore, the voltages on both the gate and the source of the transistor


22


vary with the supply voltage V


CC


so that the source-to-gate voltage of the transistor


22


is constant despite variations in the supply voltage V


CC


. Similarly, variations in the supply voltage V


CC


are coupled to the gates of the transistors


90


,


92


. However, since the voltage on the source of the transistor


92


also varies with V


CC


, the source-to-gate of voltage of the transistor


92


is insensitive to variations in the supply voltage V


CC


. The current flowing through the transistor


96


is thus constant despite variations in the supply voltage V


CC


.




During the discharge of the capacitor, variations in the ground potential are more critical than variations in the supply voltage V


CC


because variations in ground potential may affect the rate at which the capacitor


40


is discharged. However, variations in ground potential are coupled to the control voltage V


N


in the same manner that variations in the supply voltage V


CC


are coupled to the control signal V


P


. Since the source of the NMOS transistor


32


is also at ground potential, the source-to-gate voltage of the transistor


32


is constant despite variations in ground potential. As a result, the charge and discharge rates of the capacitor


40


are insensitive to variations in the supply voltages, i.e., V


CC


and ground.




Although the duty cycle correction system


10


may be used in a variety of devices, it is shown in

FIG. 7

as part of a synchronous dynamic random access memory


110


(“SDRAM”). The SDRAM


110


includes a control logic circuit


114


, an address decoder


116


, and a read/write circuit


118


, all of which are coupled to a memory array


120


. As is well known in the art, the address decoder


116


receives an address over an address


1


bus


22


and provides a decoded address to the memory array


120


to select an individual memory cell in the memory array. The read/write circuit


118


operates to receive data over a data bus


124


and provide that data to the memory array


120


during a write operation, and to provide data from the memory array to the data bus during a read operation.




The SDRAM


110


performs data transfer operations under control of the control logic circuit


114


which receives data transfer commands, including read or write commands, over a control bus


126


. In response to these data transfer commands, the control logic circuit


114


executes each of the steps required to perform a read or write data transfer operation. The SDRAM


110


also receives a CLK to control the timing of various operations. The CLK signal may have a duty cycle that varies from a desired value, such as 50%. As a result, the CLK is applied to the duty cycle correction system


18


to generate the CLK-ADJ signal. The control logic circuit


114


executes each of the requisite steps synchronously, with the timing of each step being established relative to a rising edge of the adjusted clock signal CLK-ADJ. A clock enable signal CKE enables the clocking of the control logic circuit


114


by the adjusted clock signal CLK-ADJ.





FIG. 8

shows a computer system


200


containing the SDRAM


110


of

FIG. 7

using the duty cycle correction system


18


of FIG.


1


. The computer system


200


includes a processor


202


for performing various computing functions, such as executing specific software to perform specific calculations or tasks. The processor


202


includes a processor bus


204


that normally includes an address bus, a control bus, and a data bus. In addition, the computer system


200


includes one or more input devices


214


, such as a keyboard or a mouse, coupled to the processor


202


to allow an operator to interface with the computer system


200


. Typically, the computer system


200


also includes one or more output devices


216


coupled to the processor


202


, such output devices typically being a printer or a video terminal. One or more data storage devices


218


are also typically coupled to the processor


202


to allow the processor


202


to store data in or retrieve data from internal or external storage media (not shown). Examples of typical storage devices


218


include hard and floppy disks, tape cassettes, and compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs). The processor


202


is also typically coupled to cache memory


226


, which is usually static random access memory (“SRAM”) and to the SDRAM


110


through a memory controller


230


. The memory controller


230


normally includes a control bus


236


and an address bus


238


that are coupled to the SDRAM


110


. A data bus


240


may be coupled to the processor bus


204


either directly (as shown), through the memory controller


230


, or by some other means.




From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the functions performed by the components shown in

FIG. 1

may be combined so that they are performed by a fewer number of components or expanded so that they are performed by a greater number of components. Additionally, a variety of circuits may be used in place of the circuits shown in FIGS.


2


and


4


-


6


. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A duty cycle corrector circuit, comprising:a first switch having a control input coupled to receive an input clock signal, the first switch being closed responsive to a first logic level of the input clock signal; a second switch having a control input coupled to receive the input clock signal, the second switch being closed responsive to a second logic level of the input clock signal; a first current regulating device coupled in series with the first switch between a first supply voltage and an output node, the first current regulating device having a control input coupled to receive a first control signal; a second current regulating device coupled in series with the second switch between the output node and a second supply voltage; the second current regulating device having a control input coupled to receive a second control signal; a capacitor coupled to the output node; a level detector coupled to the output node, the level detector setting an output clock signal to a first logic level responsive to the voltage on the capacitor being greater than a first transition voltage and setting the output clock signal to a second logic level responsive to the voltage on the capacitor being less than a second transition voltage; a third switch coupled in parallel with the first current regulating device, the third switch being structured to close responsive to the voltage on the capacitor being charged to at least the first transition voltage; and a fourth switch coupled in parallel with the second current regulating device, the fourth switch being structured to close responsive to the voltage on the capacitor being discharged to at least the second transition voltage.
  • 2. The duty cycle corrector circuit of claim 1 wherein the first and second current regulating devices comprise respective first and second transistors having their gates coupled to receive the first and second control signals, respectively.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/654,226, filed Aug. 30, 2000 is now a U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,178.

US Referenced Citations (20)
Number Name Date Kind
5179298 Hirano et al. Jan 1993 A
5621360 Huang Apr 1997 A
5812619 Runaldue Sep 1998 A
6011732 Harrison et al. Jan 2000 A
6060922 Chow et al. May 2000 A
6084452 Drost et al. Jul 2000 A
6119242 Harrison Sep 2000 A
6125157 Donnelly et al. Sep 2000 A
6198322 Yoshimura Mar 2001 B1
6320438 Arcus Nov 2001 B1
6340904 Manning Jan 2002 B1
6420920 Huber et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424178 Harrison Jul 2002 B1
6445644 Sher Sep 2002 B2
6469555 Lau et al. Oct 2002 B1
6486713 Wright et al. Nov 2002 B2
6504409 Laletin Jan 2003 B1
6522160 Zivanovic Feb 2003 B1
6526109 Chang et al. Feb 2003 B1
6539072 Donnelly et al. Mar 2003 B1