The invention relates to a system for stamping a part from a blank of material. More particularly, the invention relates to a system and method for detecting abnormalities in the part stamped by a die using forces measured during stamping operations and comparing them with a profile of forces for a properly stamped part.
Stamping operations are done using a die. The die includes an upper die and a lower die, also referenced herein as a slide press and a die cushion respectively. A sheet of material, also referenced in the art as a blank, is placed between the slide and die cushion and the slide and die cushion are pressed against each other so as to form the blank into a desired part.
The part may then be visually inspected to ensure that no abnormalities existed during stamping operations. As visual inspection may be time consuming and subject to human error, systems have been put in place to make the inspection automated.
For instance, it is known to use the displacement of the press with respect to stamping operations to determine whether or not any flaws occurred during stamping operations. Other methods include measuring compressive and tensile forces on the production part. However, these methods do not take into account the work and force peaks which are transmitted during the stamping operation and thus will not determine the type of the flaw that has occurred. Further, such methods and systems do not provide the type of defect present in the stamped part.
Accordingly, it remains desirable to have a system which not only detects whether or not the part is defective but will also provide the type of flaw that occurred thus allowing for operators and management to reconfigure stamping operations to eliminate the flaw. For example, if it is detected that the machine has produced parts which have wrinkles, then the forming characteristics of the forces with respect to time may direct the user as to where in the forming process the wrinkles have been formed.
The present invention provides a system and method for detecting a defective part and the type of defect formed during stamping operations. The system and method will not only detect the defect but also the nature of the defect and the time at which the defect occurred during stamping operations. Such information is useful not only in quality control but also in isolating a problem which may exist in stamping operations and thus eliminating time for isolating such problems and correcting them.
The method includes the step of establishing a profile. The profile includes characteristics of forces of a properly stamped part. Such characteristics include peak forces applied by the die with respect to a particular point in time during stamping operations. Stamping operations as used herein refers to the process by which die parts are moved together to press a blank and are released from each other so as to free the blank for use in manufacturing.
The method further includes the step of measuring the forces of the stamped blank of material and comparing the force characteristics of each of the stamped blanks of material with the profile of the properly stamped part. The profile may further include defective profiles, the defective profile being a profile of an improperly formed part having a particular defect. The defective profiles may include force characteristics for a part formed with a wrinkle, or a split. The existence of the wrinkle or split may be analyzed to determine the root cause of the defect. This root cause may be recorded as part of the defective profile. For instance, a wrinkle may be formed for numerous reasons; however, a particular reason may have a unique force characteristic. Once the root cause is determined, the identified root cause is then associated with that particular wrinkle.
The force characteristics of various defects, to include the location of the defect within the part may be recorded and used to for a respective defective profile. Thus, operators overseeing stamping operations may be able to not only identify that the part is defective but the location and nature of the defect. Further, the die operators may be able to easily recognize the root cause of the defect and take corrective measures to minimize manufacturing loss.
A system for controlling the quality of a stamped part from a blank of material is also provided. The system includes a die having a slide press and a cushion press. A sensor is mounted to the die and is operable to detect the forces applied to the blank of material. A database having a profile including characteristics of forces of a properly stamped part is used to compare the forces measured during stamping operations.
The profile may further include defective profiles. Each of the defective profiles having characteristics of forces which identify the nature of the defect. A processor is in communication with the sensor. The processor compares the forces detected during the stamping of a part and labels the part defective when the detected forces deviate from the profile of the properly stamped part. The processor may further search the database for a defective profile which matches the detected profile so as to identify the nature of the defect.
Referring to
With reference first to
The surfaces of the slide press 22 and cushion press 24 are configured to form a predetermined part 12 from a blank. With reference first to
With reference now to
A database 34 having a profile 20 of characteristic forces of a properly stamped part 12 may be used to compare forces detected during the stamping of a part 12 to determine the existence of a defect. The profile 20 may be formed through the manufacture of a desired part 12. Specifically, the force characteristics of the part 12 may be collected and compared so as to create the profile 20. Thus the profile 20 may be a historical record of stamped parts 12 which were formed properly. The profile 20 may include force characteristics for both the slide press 22 and the cushion press 24.
As used herein, force characteristics relates to the amount of force measured with respect to time, displacement of respective slide and cushion presses with respect to time, and the amount of work done with respect to time. Thus, not only does the profile 20 include the amount of force, but a point along time in which the force was experienced, how much work was done to stamp the part 12, and the whether the slide and cushion presses were in proper position throughout the stamping operation.
The profile 20 may further include defective profiles 36. The defective profiles 36 are force characteristics or force characteristics of a particular defect. Thus as parts 12 are stamped, particular defects are recorded. The force characteristics of those defects may be stored in the database 34 as a defective profile 36. For instance, if a part 12 is stamped with a wrinkle or a tear, the force characteristics of the defective part 12 is recorded and stored as a defective profile 36.
The processor 32 is in communication with the sensors 18. The processor 32 compares the forces detected during the stamping of the part 12 and compares those forces with the profile 20 of a properly stamped part 12. If the profile 20 matches the detected forces, then the part 12 is identified as being properly formed. If the detected forces do not match the profile 20, then the part 12 is labeled as defective. In cases where a part 12 is labeled defective, the processor 32 further searches the database 34 to determine if the detected forces match any one of the defective profiles 36. Detected forces corresponding to a defective profile 36 is then used to identify the nature of the defect. The processor 32 may further compare other aspects of the stamping operation to the profile 20, to include the work done on the part 12 and the position of the slide and cushion presses with respect to time.
The system 10 further includes an encoder 38. The encoder 38 may be disposed on either the slide press 22 or the die cushion 24. The encoder 38 is operable to detect the position of the respective slide or cushion press 22, 24 during stamping operations. [there seems to be more to the use of the encoder 38, in the slides you mentioned how the encoder 38 was necessary, please explain why]
With reference now to
As shown, there are peak forces which occur during stamping operations respectively labeled A, B and C. Peak forces indicated by references A and B show the peak forces applied by the slide press 22, whereas peak force labeled C is the peak force applied by the cushion press 24. These force characteristics indicate characteristics which are acceptable for a properly formed part 12.
The profiles 20 further include the work done by the respective slide and cushion presses as indicated in the lined portion shown in
With reference now to
With reference to
The profile 20 includes peak forces of the slide and cushion presses with respect to time and as stated below, the work performed by both the slide and the cushion presses. However, the profile 20 may also take into account various inputs such as the position of the slide and cushion presses during the stamping operations with respect to time and whether or not oil was placed on the presses or the blank. Other inputs may further include the temperature of the die 16 or the slide and cushion presses or the temperature of the blank for that matter. Thus, a profile 20 of force characteristics for a properly stamped part 12 having a thin film of oil, or without oil may be recorded and used to detect defective parts 12.
Thus the profile 20 may be one of many that the user may select based upon the part 12 being stamped, the material used in the blank, and the temperature of the die 16, or whether or not a film of oil was used. The measured forces are compared to the selected profile 20 to determine whether the stamping process produced an abnormal or defective part 12.
With reference now to
As the presses are pressed towards one another, the forces exerted by the presses are measured by the sensors 18. The forces are measured throughout the stamping operation of a respective die 16, which is until the presses are displaced from each other. The blank of material 14 is fed downstream the line through each of the dies 16. In the instant case three other die 16 presses are shown downstream the initial die 16. Each die 16 press will have a profile 20 that is characteristic for the work that the die 16 is to do on the blank of material 14. Thus the system 10 may be operable to detect a defective part 12 in any of the die 16 forming processes.
Not only is the system 10 capable of detecting a defect, the system 10 may be operable to detect the nature of the defect if a defective profile 36 matches a force characteristic of a formed part 12. The system 10 may further include an automatic shut-off 40 operable to cease operations of the die 16. The automatic shut-off may be actuated when the detected forces deviate from the profile 20 of the properly stamped part 12. With reference to
An indication as to the nature of the defect may be provided wherein the detected forces match one of the defective profiles 36 stored in the database 34. The existence of the wrinkle or tear may be analyzed to determine the root cause of the defect. This root cause may be recorded as part 12 of the defective profile 36. For instance, a wrinkle may be formed for numerous reasons; however, a particular reason may have a unique force characteristic. Once the root cause is determined, the identified root cause is then associated with that particular wrinkle. Identification of the root cause may reduce manufacturing loss by allowing the operator to go right to the source of the error as opposed to trouble shooting the entire system 10.
With reference now to
The method 100 further includes the step of measuring the forces of a stamped blank of material 14 and comparing the stress characteristics of each of the stamped blank of material 14 with the profile 20 of the properly stamped part 12 at 108. The method 100 proceeds to step 110 where any of the stamped blank material is labeled as being a defective part 12 where the forces deviate from the profile 20 of the properly stamped part 12. The profile 20 may take into consideration the force of the slide and cushion presses and may include establishing a force parameter wherein stamped materials having slide and cushion press 22, 24 forces outside of the side force parameter are labeled as defective.
The method 100 may include using other inputs to further define a profile 20. For instance, the method 100 may include the use of the speed of the die 16 operation, the temperature of the die 16, or the existence of a film of oil on the blank of the material to establish the profile 20. Thus, a profile 20 for a properly formed part 12 at 100° Fahrenheit may have different force characteristics than that same part 12 properly formed at 80° Fahrenheit. Likewise, a profile 20 may have different force and force characteristics for the same part 12 where one part 12 is made with a film of oil and the other is not.
The method 100 may further include the step of establishing a defective profile 36 at. The defective profile 36 may be established by recording the forces exerted by the slide and cushion press 22, 24 in the formation of a defect in a particular part 12. For instance, the formation of a wrinkle in a part 12 may leave a unique force characteristic. The force characteristics of each of the stamped part 12 may be compared with the defective profiles 36, and the nature of the defect may be provided as shown at step 112.
The method 100 may further include the step of recording the root cause and associating the root cause with the defective profile 36 at 106. The root cause of the defect may be analyzed by die 16 operators. Thus the method 100 not only identifies a defect, but also provides the nature of the defect and the root cause.
In view of the teaching presented herein, it is to be understood that numerous modifications and variations of the present invention will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. Likewise, the foregoing is illustrative of specific embodiments of the invention but is not meant to be a limitation upon the practice thereof. It is the following claims, including all equivalents, which define the scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/041,857 filed on Mar. 7, 2011, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13041857 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14571845 | US |