The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for controlling trim position of trimmable propulsion devices with respect to a transom of a marine vessel.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,298,824, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a control system for a fuel injected engine provides an engine control unit that receives signals from a throttle handle that is manually manipulated by an operator of a marine vessel. The engine control unit also measures engine speed and various other parameters, such as manifold absolute pressure, temperature, barometric pressure, and throttle position. The engine control unit controls the timing of fuel injectors and the injection system and also controls the position of a throttle plate. No direct connection is provided between a manually manipulated throttle handle and the throttle plate. All operating parameters are either calculated as a function of ambient conditions or determined by selecting parameters from matrices which allow the engine control unit to set the operating parameters as a function of engine speed and torque demand, as represented by the position of the throttle handle.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,404, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a Hall effect rotational position sensor is mounted on a pivotable member of a marine propulsion system and a rotatable portion of the rotational position sensor is attached to a drive structure of the marine propulsion system. Relative movement between the pivotable member, such as a gimbal ring, and the drive structure, such as the outboard drive portion of the marine propulsion system, cause relative movement between the rotatable and stationary portions of the rotational position sensor. As a result, signals can be provided which are representative of the angular position between the drive structure and the pivotable member.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,156,709, incorporated by reference herein, discloses the calibration procedure allows an upward maximum limit of tilt to be automatically determined and stored as an operator rotates a marine propulsion device relative to a marine vessel with a particular indication present. That indication can be a grounded circuit point which informs a microprocessor that at calibration procedure is occurring in relation to an upward trim limit. When the ground wire is removed or disconnected from the circuit point, the microprocessor knows that the calibration process is complete. During the rotation of the outboard motor or marine propulsion device in an upward direction, both the angular position of the outboard motor and the direction of change of a signal from a trim sensor are stored.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,416,456, incorporated by reference herein, discloses an automatic trim control system changes the trim angle of a marine propulsion device as a function of the speed of the marine vessel relative to the water in which it is operated. The changing of the trim angle occurs between first and second speed magnitudes which operate as minimum and maximum speed thresholds.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,762,022, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a system and method is provided for efficiently changing controlled engine speed of a marine internal combustion engine in a marine propulsion system for propelling a marine vessel. The system responds to the operator changing the operator-selected engine speed, from a first-selected engine speed to a second-selected engine speed, by predicting throttle position needed to provide the second-selected engine speed, and providing a feed forward signal moving the throttle to the predicted throttle position, without waiting for a slower responding PID controller and/or overshoot thereof, and concomitant instability or oscillation, and then uses the engine speed control system including any PID controller to maintain engine speed at the second-selected engine speed.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,011,982, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a support system for an outboard motor provides a restricted member that is attached to a bottom portion of the outboard motor and a restricting member that is attached to a support structure that is, in turn, attached to a transom of a marine vessel. The restricted member is prevented from moving in a starboard or port direction by a magnitude greater than a preselected magnitude that is defined by a gap between restricting and restricted surfaces that move into contact with each other when forces on the outboard motor cause a lower portion of the outboard motor to move by a magnitude greater than a predefined limit in either the port or starboard directions. Preselected gaps between restricting and restricted surfaces are sized to allow nominal vibration at low operating speeds of the outboard motor while restricting excessive lateral movement during operation at high speed.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,457,820, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a method is provided by controlling the operation of a marine vessel subject to porpoising. The method includes sensing an operational characteristic of the marine vessel which is indicative of porpoising of the marine vessel, and responding to the sensing of the operational characteristic with a response that is representative of the operational characteristic of the marine vessel as being indicative of the porpoising of the marine vessel.
Unpublished U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/684,952, filed Apr. 13, 2015, and assigned to the Applicant of the present application, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a method for setting an engine speed of an internal combustion engine in a marine propulsion device to an engine speed setpoint includes receiving an operator demand from an input device and learning an adapted maximum engine speed. An engine speed setpoint is calculated by scaling the adapted maximum engine speed relative to the operator demand. The method includes predicting a position of a throttle valve of the engine that is needed to achieve the engine speed setpoint, and determining a feed forward signal that will move the throttle valve to the predicted position. A marine propulsion system has an electronic control unit that learns the adapted maximum engine speed, calculates the engine speed setpoint by scaling the adapted maximum engine speed relative to the operator demand, predicts the position of the throttle valve, and determines the feed forward signal that will move the throttle valve to the predicted position.
Unpublished U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/873,803, filed Oct. 2, 2015, and assigned to the Applicant of the present application, incorporated by reference herein, discloses systems and methods disclosed herein control position of a trimmable drive unit with respect to a marine vessel. A controller determines a target trim position as a function of vessel or engine speed. An actual trim position is measured and compared to the target trim position. The controller sends a control signal to a trim actuator to trim the drive unit toward the target trim position if the actual trim position is not equal to the target trim position and if at least one of the following is true: a defined dwell time has elapsed since a previous control signal was sent to the trim actuator to trim the drive unit; a given number of previous control signals has not been exceeded in an attempt to achieve the target trim position; and a difference between the target trim position and the actual trim position is outside of a given deadband.
Unpublished U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/003,326, filed Jan. 21, 2016, and assigned to the Applicant of the present application, incorporated by reference herein, discloses a method for controlling a trim system on a marine vessel includes receiving an actual trim position of a trimmable marine device at a controller and determining a trim position error by comparing the actual trim position to a target trim position with the controller. The method also includes determining an acceleration rate of the marine vessel. In response to determining that the trim position error exceeds a first error threshold and the magnitude of the acceleration rate exceeds a given rate threshold, the controller commands the marine device to the target trim position. In response to determining that the trim position error exceeds the first error threshold and the acceleration rate does not exceed the given rate threshold, the controller commands the marine device to a setpoint trim position that is different from the target trim position. An associated system is also disclosed.
Unpublished U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/003,335, filed Jan. 21, 2016, and assigned to the Applicant of the present application, which is incorporated by reference herein, discloses a method for controlling a trim system on a marine vessel includes receiving an actual trim position of a trimmable marine device at a controller and determining a magnitude of a trim position error by comparing the actual trim position to a target trim position with the controller. The method also includes determining a magnitude of an acceleration rate of the marine vessel. The controller determines the activation time of a trim actuator coupled to and rotating the marine device with respect to the marine vessel based on the magnitude of the trim position error and the magnitude of the acceleration rate. The controller then sends a control signal to activate the trim actuator to rotate the marine device toward the target trim position. The method includes discontinuing the control signal once the activation time expires to deactivate the trim actuator. A corresponding system is also disclosed.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In one embodiment, a method of controlling trim position of a propulsion device includes receiving a current engine speed and a current trim position of the propulsion device, and then detecting at least a threshold increase in engine speed or at least a threshold drop in engine load on the propulsion device. A reduced trim position is then determined based on the current trim position, and a trim actuator is operated to move the propulsion device to the reduced trim position.
One embodiment of a system for controlling trim position of a propulsion device on a marine vessel includes a trim actuator configured to adjust a trim position of the propulsion device and a controller that controls the trim actuator. The controller is configured to receive a current engine speed and a current trim position of the trim actuator, and to detect a threshold increase in engine speed or a threshold drop in engine load on the propulsion device. The controller is further configured to determine a reduced trim position based on the current trim position, and to operate the trim actuator to move the propulsion device to the reduced trim position.
The present disclosure is described with reference to the following Figures. The same numbers are used throughout the Figures to reference like features and like components.
In the present description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed.
The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for controlling a trim actuator on a marine vessel so as to control a relative position of a propulsion device mounted to the transom of a marine vessel. Those skilled in the art of marine vessel propulsion and control are familiar with many different ways in which the trim angle of a propulsion device, such as an outboard motor or stern drive, can be varied to change the handling or fuel efficiency of the vessel. For example, many manual trim control systems are known to those skilled in the art. In typical operation, the operator of a marine vessel can change the trim angle of an associated outboard motor as the velocity of the vessel changes. This is done to maintain an appropriate angle of the vessel with respect to the water as it achieves a planing speed and as it increases its velocity over the water while on plane. The operator inputs a command to change the trim angle for example by using a keypad, button, or similar input device with “trim up” and “trim down” input choices (e.g., see
The systems of the present disclosure may be capable of carrying out automatic trim (auto-trim) methods, in which the propulsion device is automatically trimmed up or down with respect to its current position, depending on a desired attitude of the marine vessel with respect to vessel speed. Auto-trim systems perform trim operations automatically, as a function of vessel speed, without requiring intervention by the operator of the marine vessel. The automatic change in trim angle of the trimmable propulsion device 10 enhances the operation of the marine vessel as it achieves planing speed and as it further increases its velocity over the water while on plane. For example, trimming the propulsion device 10 can affect a direction of thrust of a propeller with respect to a vessel transom, as well as affect vessel roll and pitch.
The trim position of the propulsion device 10 is actuated by a trim actuator 16. In one example, the trim actuator is a hydraulic piston-cylinder assembly in fluid communication with a hydraulic pump-motor combination, although the principles of some of the below examples could apply equally to electric linear actuators, pneumatic actuators, or other types of trim devices. The trim actuator may be actuated between an extended position and a retracted position by provision of hydraulic fluid, electrical power, pneumatic fluid, etc. The extension and retraction of the trim actuator can be used to rotate a trimmable propulsion device up and down with respect to a marine vessel to which it is coupled.
During cornering at high speeds, the marine vessel 14 rolls toward the port side 11 or starboard side 12 (depending on the direction of the turn). When in a very trimmed out position, the propulsion device(s) 10 on the turning marine vessel 14 tends to come out of the water, known as prop venting or blow out. Through experimentation and research in the relevant field, the present inventor has recognized that the problems and issues relating to prop venting, such as may occur in a steep turn, can be lessened and alleviated by changing the trim position of the propulsion device 10, such as by a control method that detects the occurrence of blowout and promptly reduces the trim position of the propulsion device as the vessel turns. The inventor has further recognized that current auto-trim systems and methods are insufficient because their response to prop venting and blow out is delayed, requiring a measured loss of speed before trimming down the propulsion device 10. The detection of speed loss can be delayed further due to filtering of the GPS signal and waiting on the minimum time between corrections, resulting in allowance of extended periods of prop venting or blow out, causing significant loss of speed, uneven propulsion, and even damage to the propulsion device 10. To address this problem, the inventor developed the disclosed method and system to immediately detect the occurrence of prop venting or blowout based on a change in engine speed or engine load, and then to automatically move the propulsion device to a reduced trim position.
With reference to
When a prop venting or blowout event occurs, the load on the propulsion device 10 suddenly decreases, as the propeller experiences reduced or no resistance from the water. Depending on the configuration of the propulsion device, the sudden decrease in load may cause either a sudden spike in engine speed or a sudden change in throttle valve 52 position. In a system where operator demand to the engine 60 (such as from a throttle lever 68) is associated with throttle position, the engine speed will spike as a result of the sudden decrease in engine load when the propeller vents or blows out. Since the operator demand is tied to position of the throttle valve 52, the throttle valve 52 position remains constant at a given throttle lever 68 position and the engine speed varies in response to changing conditions. Thus, in such a configuration, monitoring of engine speed can provide good detection of prop venting or blowout events.
However, in other embodiments where operator demand (such as from a throttle lever 68) is correlated to a particular engine speed, the engine speed will remain constant at the demanded value, even under sudden decreases in engine load, and instead the position of the throttle valve is varied to maintain that demanded engine speed. Examples of such systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,298,824, 8,762,022, and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/684,952, which are incorporated herein above. In such systems, the decrease in engine load requires less throttle to maintain a constant speed, resulting in lower manifold pressure (MAP) and intake mass flow rate (MAF). Accordingly, information regarding a sudden decrease in engine load can be gleaned from the MAF sensor 56, as a decrease in airflow through the intake manifold will occur as an immediate response to the throttle closing in response to the sudden decrease in load. Likewise, the sudden decrease in engine load will be reflected as a decrease in manifold pressure sensed by the MAP sensor 57, because the air pressure in the intake manifold 55 will decrease as the throttle valve 52 is closed in response to the sudden decrease in load.
As described above, the present inventor has recognized that the trim position of the propulsion device 10 on a marine vessel can be automatically controlled at high speeds to stop a prop venting or blowout event. Namely, upon detection of prop venting or blowout, such as by detecting a sudden increase in engine speed or a sudden decrease in engine load, the system 1 for controlling trim position determines a reduced trim position and operates the trim actuator to move the propulsion device to the reduced trim position. In other words, the propulsion device 10 is be trimmed in (or trimmed down, or trim decreased) from the current trim position in order to move the propeller further down underneath the surface of the water.
Referring to
One example of a hydraulic trim actuator 16 is shown in
In this way, the trim actuator 16 can position the propulsion device 10 at different angles with respect to the transom 9. These may be a neutral (level) trim position, in which the propulsion device 10 is in more or less of a vertical position; a trimmed in (trimmed down) position; or a trimmed out (trimmed up) position. A trimmed out position, as shown in
The controller 38 may define the trim position by reference to a vertical line V. When the centerline CL of the propulsion device 10 is parallel to the vertical line V, the controller 38 may consider this to be zero trim. Trim position can be quantified as a value P with respect to the vertical line V, which represents the angle or comparative position between the centerline CL of the propulsion device 10 and the vertical line V. This value P can be expressed as an angle, a percentage of a total angle to which the propulsion device 10 can be trimmed, a scalar value, a polar coordinate, or any other appropriate unit. For purposes of the description provided herein below, the angle P will be expressed as a percentage of total allowable trim angle, which can be measured from vertical, from a fully trimmed out position, or from a fully trimmed in position.
In some examples, the controller 38 may be a computing system that includes a processing system, storage system, software, and input/output (I/O) interfaces for communicating with devices such as those shown in
The storage system (e.g., memory 48) can comprise any storage media readable by the processing system and capable of storing software. The storage system can include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. The storage system can be implemented as a single storage device or across multiple storage devices or sub-systems. The storage system can further include additional elements, such as a control circuitry capable of communicating with the processing system. Non-limiting examples of storage media include random access memory, read only memory, magnetic discs, optical discs, flash memory, virtual memory, and non-virtual memory, magnetic sets, magnetic tape, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and that may be accessed by a processing system. The storage media can be a non-transitory or a transitory storage media.
In this example, the controller 38 communicates with one or more components of the system 1 via a communication link 50, which can be a wired or wireless link. The controller 38 is capable of monitoring and controlling one or more operational characteristics of the system 1 and its various subsystems by sending and receiving control signals via the communication link 50. In one example, the communication link 50 is a controller area network (CAN) bus, but other types of links could be used. It should be noted that the extent of connections of the communication link 50 shown herein is for schematic purposes only, and the communication link 50 in fact provides communication between the controller 38 and each of the sensors, devices, etc. described herein, although not every connection is shown in the drawing for purposes of clarity.
As mentioned, the controller 38 receives inputs from several different sensors and/or input devices aboard or coupled to the marine vessel 14. For example, the controller 38 receives a steering input from steering input device(s), such as a joystick and/or a steering wheel 54. Alternatively or additionally, steering input may be provided by an automatic steering control system, associated with the marine vessel 14, such as a heading or waypoint control system. The controller 38 may also be provided with an input from a vessel speed sensor 69. The vessel speed sensor 69 may be, for example, a pressure-type sensor, such as pitot tube 69a, a paddle wheel type sensor 69b, or any other speed sensor appropriate for sensing the actual speed of the marine vessel. Alternatively or additionally, the vessel speed may instead be determined based on readings from a GPS device 69c, which calculates speed by determining how far the vessel 14 has traveled in a given amount of time. A trim position sensor 62 may also be provided for sensing an actual position of the trim actuator 16, for example, by measuring a relative position between two parts associated with the trim actuator 16. The trim position sensor 62 may be any type of sensor known to those having ordinary skill in the art, for example a Hall effect sensor or a potentiometer, such as examples provided and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,404 incorporated herein by reference.
Other inputs to the system 1 can come from operator input devices such as a throttle lever 68, a keypad 70, and a touchscreen 64. In addition to speed control input, the throttle lever 68 allows the operator of the marine vessel to choose to operate the vessel in neutral, forward, or reverse, as is known. The keypad 70 can be used to initiate or exit any number of control or operation modes (such as auto-trim mode), or to make selections while operating within one of the selected modes. In one example, the keypad 70 comprises an interface having a “trim up” button 70a, a “trim down” button 70b, and an “auto-trim on/resume” button 70c, which can be utilized by a user to control the trim position of the propulsion device 10. For example, the trim buttons 70a and 70b may provide user input to control the propulsion device to the same trim position. The touchscreen 64 can also be used to initiate or exit any number of control or operation modes (such as trim up, trim down, or auto-trim mode), and in that case the inputs can be buttons in the traditional sense or selectable screen icons. The touchscreen 64 can also display information about the system 1 to the operator of the vessel 14, such as engine speed, vessel speed, trim angle, trim operating mode, vessel acceleration rate, etc. Additionally, the touchscreen 64 may replace the keypad 70, providing the trim buttons 70a-70b.
The trim position of the propulsion device is generally increased as the vessel speed increases and thus the propulsion device 10 is generally trimmed out (applying positive trim) at high speeds when the marine vessel is on plane. In the depicted example, the current trim position 72 is the value on the trim position curve 71 at the current speed 77. In the depicted relationship the trim position increases generally proportionally with the speed between the lower speed threshold 76 and the upper speed threshold 78. The propulsion device 10 is movable to a maximum positive trim position 74 (or maximum trim out position). In the graph, zero trim represents the vertical position when the propulsion device 10 is in line with vertical line V (
Step 108 determines whether at least a threshold increase in engine speed has been detected that indicates that prop venting or blowout is occurring. In various embodiments, the threshold engine speed value may be a calculated value or a predetermined fixed value. For example, the threshold increase in engine speed may be a percentage increase amount or may be a fixed value. To provide just one example, a relevant threshold increase in engine speed that might be indicative of prop venting or blowout in some marine vessels could be in the range of 250 RPM to 2000 RPM, or more, depending on the previous reading in respect to the engine's rated speed. If the threshold in engine speed is not detected at step 108, then the method returns to step 102 where it receives and assesses a subsequent engine speed measurement. If the threshold increase in engine speed is detected at step 108, then instructions may be executed at step 110 to determine whether the increase in engine speed is sustained for at least a predetermined period of time. For example, subsequently received engine speed values may be compared to the previous engine speed or a filtered engine speed value used in the above-described step 108 to determine whether the threshold increase detected at step 108 has been sustained or was just a momentary increase. Checking whether the increased engine speed is sustained avoids over adjustment of trim based on momentary or erroneous current engine speed measurements. Further, verifying that the increase is sustained differentiates a true prop venting or blowout events from other events where a sudden decrease in load may occur, such as wave hopping. The value of the predetermined period for sustaining the engine speed increase may also vary based on configuration of the marine vessel 14 and/or propulsion device 10; however, in one exemplary embodiment, an appropriate predetermined period for step 110 may be in the range of 1 to 5 seconds. If the increase in engine speed is not sustained, then the system returns to step 102 to assess a subsequent engine speed value. If the speed increase is sustained for the predetermined period, then a reduced trim position is determined at step 112. The trim actuator 16 is then controlled at step 114 to move the propulsion device 10 to the reduced trim position, which should alleviate or eliminate the detected prop venting or blowout.
The reduced trim position is determined based on the current trim position, such as the value received at step 102, and speed, which may be vessel speed and/or engine speed. The reduced trim position may be a calibrated value that is likely to alleviate the prop venting and/or blowout event at a given vessel speed or engine speed and current trim position, but otherwise minimizes the amount that the trim is adjusted. For example, the calibrated value may account for how the particular marine vessel 14 and propulsion device 10 configuration behaves at a given speed, such as how it corners and how it responds to trim changes. For example, the reduced trim position may be determined by accessing a lookup table containing trim reduction values based on current trim position and vessel speed or engine speed. Alternatively, the reduced trim position may be a predetermined trim reduction amount. For example, the trim position of the propulsion device may be continually reduced by the predetermined trim amount until the propeller hooks back up with the water, e.g., until the engine load increases to an expected value. In still other embodiments, the trim reduction amount may be a calculated value, such as a percentage of the current trim position.
If the current load indicator is less than the previous engine load indicator or filtered load indicator value by at least the threshold amount at step 107, then instructions are executed at step 109 to determine whether the drop in engine load is sustained for at least a predetermined period of time. If the relevant threshold drop in engine load is not detected, or the drop in engine load is not sustained, then the system returns to step 103 and assesses a subsequent engine load indicator. If the drop in engine load is sustained, then a reduced trim position is determined at step 112, such as by utilizing one of the exemplary lookup tables provided in
In various embodiments, the propulsion device 10 may be held at the reduced trim position for a period of time, after which the propulsion device may be returned to its original trim position before the venting or blow out occurred. Alternatively or additionally, trim control may be turned back over to the speed-based auto trim control module. The handoff between the reduced trim position and original trim position control module, either from being manually trimmed or automatically trimmed, could take place after a calibrated time has expired, or after an increase in vessel speed measured by speed sensor 69 is detected again, indicating that the propeller is no longer in a blow-out or venting condition.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. Certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have features or structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent features or structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3777694 | Best | Dec 1973 | A |
3999502 | Mayer | Dec 1976 | A |
4050359 | Mayer | Sep 1977 | A |
4318699 | Wenstadt et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4490120 | Hundertmark | Dec 1984 | A |
4565528 | Nakase | Jan 1986 | A |
4718872 | Olson et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4749926 | Ontolchik | Jun 1988 | A |
4762079 | Takeuchi | Aug 1988 | A |
4776818 | Cahoon et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4824407 | Torigai et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4836810 | Entringer | Jun 1989 | A |
4861292 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4872857 | Newman et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4898563 | Torigai et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4908766 | Takeuchi | Mar 1990 | A |
4931025 | Torigai et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939660 | Newman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4940434 | Kiesling | Jul 1990 | A |
4957457 | Probst et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5080064 | Buslepp et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5113780 | Bennett et al. | May 1992 | A |
5142473 | Davis | Aug 1992 | A |
5171172 | Heaton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5263432 | Davis | Nov 1993 | A |
5352137 | Iwai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366393 | Uenage et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5385110 | Bennett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5474012 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474013 | Wittmaier | Dec 1995 | A |
5507672 | Imaeda | Apr 1996 | A |
5540174 | Kishi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5647780 | Hosoi | Jul 1997 | A |
5683275 | Nanami | Nov 1997 | A |
5707263 | Eick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5832860 | Lexau | Nov 1998 | A |
5836851 | Ruman | Nov 1998 | A |
5848582 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5879209 | Jones | Mar 1999 | A |
6007391 | Eilert | Dec 1999 | A |
6009371 | Kobayashi | Dec 1999 | A |
6095077 | DeAgro | Aug 2000 | A |
6152102 | Ruman | Nov 2000 | A |
6167830 | Pilger | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6273771 | Buckley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280269 | Gaynor | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298824 | Suhre | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322404 | Magee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354237 | Gaynor et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425370 | Kramer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458003 | Krueger | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6561016 | Suhre et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583728 | Staerzl | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587765 | Graham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6701890 | Suhre et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6733350 | Lida et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745715 | Shen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757606 | Gonring | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6997763 | Kaji | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7143363 | Gaynor et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7156709 | Staerzl et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7163000 | Ishida et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188581 | Davis et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7311058 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7347753 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7357120 | Kaji | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7389165 | Kaji | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416456 | Gonring et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7462082 | Kishibata et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473149 | Mizokawa | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7524219 | Torrangs et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7543544 | Yap | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556547 | Kaji | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7617026 | Gee et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7641525 | Morvillo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7917283 | Kado | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7942711 | Swan | May 2011 | B1 |
7972243 | Kado et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7976354 | Kubota et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8011982 | Baier et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8113892 | Gable et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8145370 | Borrett | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8216007 | Moore | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8261682 | DeVito | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8340847 | Sako et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8376791 | Chiecchi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376793 | Chiecchi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388390 | Kuriyagawa et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428799 | Cansiani et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444446 | Kuriyagawa et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457820 | Gonring | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8480445 | Morvillo | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8583300 | Oehlgrien et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8622777 | McNalley et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8631753 | Morvillo | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8740658 | Kuriyagawa | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762022 | Arbuckle et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8807059 | Samples et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8855890 | Egle et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8858278 | Morvillo | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9039468 | Arbuckle et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9052717 | Walser et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9145839 | Andrasko | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156536 | Arbuckle et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9248898 | Kirchhoff et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9278740 | Andrasko et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9290252 | Tuchscherer | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9381989 | Poirier | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9567052 | Torrangs et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9643698 | Andrasko | May 2017 | B1 |
9695764 | Christiansen | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9751605 | Anschuetz | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9764810 | Andrasko | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9944375 | Martin | Apr 2018 | B1 |
20020086593 | Shidara et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030000500 | Chatfield | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013359 | Suganuma et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027468 | Into | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054704 | Kanno | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030082963 | Motose | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120360 | Yasui et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040069271 | Kanno et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069272 | Allen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040193338 | Kaji | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050245147 | Takada et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060047406 | Chatfield et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060166573 | Vetta et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070089654 | Bradley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089660 | Bradley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080051979 | Yasui et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080133075 | St-Pierre | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080280511 | Kado | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090117788 | Kaji | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171520 | Kaji | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100191397 | Nose et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110202258 | Fukushima et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217886 | Kuriyagawa | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110217888 | Kuriyagawa | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263167 | Chiechhi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110297462 | Grajkowski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120135649 | Morvillo | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191275 | Clever et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130312651 | Gai | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130340667 | Morvillo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140209007 | Morvillo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224166 | Morvillo | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140295717 | Kuriyagawa et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160068247 | Morvillo | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2368791 | Jan 2013 | EP |
61-108098 | May 1986 | JP |
2002-308582 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-120395 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2007-191138 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2011-0183902 | Sep 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application 2017-136367 dated Nov. 28, 2017. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application 2017-136252 dated Nov. 14, 2017. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application 2017-136422 dated Nov. 14, 2017. |
Andrasko et al., “Systems and Methods for Providing Notification Regarding Trim Angle of a Marine Propulsion Device”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,200, filed Dec. 17, 2014. |
Andrasko et al., “System and Method for Controlling Attitude of a Marine Vessel Having Trim Tabs”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/472,565, filed Aug. 29, 2014. |
Andrasko et al., “Systems and Methods for Controlling Movement of Drive Units on a Marine Vessel”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,762, filed Feb. 11, 2014. |
Mercury Marine, 90-8M0081623 JPO Owners Manual—Auto Trim Portion, Section 2—On the Water, May 2013, p. 21. |
Mercury Marine, 90-8M0076286 JPO Service Manual—Auto Trim Portion, Theory of Operation, Jul. 2013, p. 2A-5. |
Andrasko et al., “Systems and Methods for Automatically Controlling Attitude of a Marine Vessel with Trim Devices”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/873,803, filed Oct. 2, 2015. |
Anscheutz, “System and Method for Trimming a Trimmable Marine Device with Respect to a Marine Vessel”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/003,326, filed Jan. 21, 2016. |
Anscheutz, “System and Method for Trimming a Trimmable Marine Device with Respect to a Marine Vessel”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/003,335, filed Jan. 21, 2016. |
O'Brien et al., “Systems and Methods for Setting Engine Speed Relative to Operator Demand”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,952, filed Apr. 13, 2015. |
Mercury Marine, SmartCraft Manual, p. 21, 2013. |
Mercury Marine, SmartCraft Manual, p. 2A-5, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,591, filed Feb. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,767, filed Feb. 11, 2014. |
Newport, Motion Control Coordinate System, www.newport.com, pp. 7-2 through 7-25, website visited Nov. 18, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/284,795, filed May 22, 2014. |
Dengel et al., “Trim Control Systems and Methods for Marine Vessels”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,591, filed Feb. 19, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180050780 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |