This invention relates generally to power conversion and more particularly to a method and system for converting an alternating current to Ethernet in-line power.
Alternating current is the standard for power sources. However, many electrical and electronic devices require direct current power supplies. To address this need, power conversion is performed. Power conversion often involves both converting an alternating current source to a direct current as well as scaling the magnitude of the signal to an appropriate level.
Ethernet devices, such as Ethernet switches, computers, and other devices generally require a 48 volt direct current signal. In addition, this signal is often current-limited to meet Ethernet standards. Some Ethernet devices can accommodate in-line power, meaning an associated Ethernet switch provides power in conjunction with the providing of data to the Ethernet device. Other Ethernet devices, often referred to as legacy devices, do not accommodate such in-line power, and utilize separate power sources.
Conventionally, in Ethernet applications, power conversion involves two power conversion stages. The first is often referred to as a power factor correction stage in which an 85 to 265 Vrms alternating current signal is converted to a constant 400 volt direct current signal. The second stage provides isolation from the alternating current line and converts the 400 volt direct current signal to an output voltage of 48 volts DC. An in-line power detection circuit adds a third stage for Ethernet applications involving both legacy and in-line power compatible devices. The use of three stages to convert from an available alternating current signal to an Ethernet in-line power signal often requires too much equipment volume, is inefficient, and is costly.
According to one embodiment, a method for converting alternating current voltage signals to Ethernet in-line power includes converting an alternating current voltage signal to an approximate direct current voltage signal, adding at least one odd harmonic of the approximate direct current voltage signal to produce a compensated direct current voltage signal, and conditioning the compensated direct current voltage signal to produce an Ethernet in-line power signal.
Some embodiments of the invention provide numerous technical advantages. Some embodiments may benefit from some, none, or all of these advantages. According to one embodiment, a power converter is provided that requires less space, is less costly, and more efficient than traditional power converters. This may result in increased cost savings in the underlying device as well as smaller device size. Further, because of the reduced size, other components of the device may be made larger, resulting in additional cost savings.
Other technical advantages may be readily ascertained by one of skill in the art.
Reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numbers represent like parts, in which:
Embodiments of the invention are best understood by referring to
Conventionally, power conversion from alternating current to Ethernet in-line power involves multiple power conversion stages. As used herein, a power conversion stage includes at least one of each of the following components: a switch, such as a field effect transistor, and a controller. Some stages may also include an input filter, an output filter, and a magnetic device, such as an inductor or a transformer. The use of multiple stages to convert alternating current to Ethernet in-line power can use too much equipment volume, may be inefficient, and may be costly. These problems are exacerbated when a detection stage is added to detect the presence of a legacy or in-line power device. Such a stage would often add a third stage to the power conversion. With only a single stage of power conversion, multiple powered devices require multiple power converters, resulting in port to port isolation at no additional cost.
According to the teachings of the invention, a single stage power converter is provided that converts AC power to Ethernet in-line power, which may include a detection portion, all in one stage. Such a power converter requires less space and is less costly than conventional systems, in one embodiment. This is primarily attributable to the removal of many of the components that are conventionally required for each power conversion stage. The teachings of the invention recognize that removal of such conventional structure from the various power conversion stages would result in a waveform of undesired characteristics, without compensation. In particular, the teachings of the invention recognize that extraordinarily large input and output filters would be required, in one embodiment, to produce a desirable waveform. The teachings of the invention recognize that an intermediate waveform may be modified through predistortion compensation, thus reducing the need for extraordinarily large input and output filters. In one particular embodiment, an intermediate waveform is compensated by adding third and fifth harmonics to reduce the size of valleys that occur in the waveform. By performing such predistortion compensation, the input and output filters of the power converter may take on an economical form. Example embodiments are described below in conjunction with
Power converter 10 includes a rectifier 12, an input filter 14, a predistortion compensation and per port conditioning block 20, a controller 18, and a phase detector 22. In one embodiment, forty-eight predistortion compensation and per port conditioning blocks 20 are provided for each power converter 10. This corresponds to forty-eight ports per Ethernet switch; however any suitable number of per port conditioning blocks may be utilized. Further, in one embodiment, one predistortion compensation and per port conditioning block 20 is provided for each connected power device 24.
Rectifier 12 receives an alternating current as its input and produces a rectified signal at node 28, which is the input to input filter 14. Example waveforms at nodes 26 and 28 are illustrated in
Per port conditioning and predistortion compensation 20 addresses correcting valleys 36 by adding harmonics to waveform 30 to result in the waveform at node 32. Any suitable addition of waveforms may be utilized to result in a desired waveform 32; however, in one embodiment a plurality of odd harmonics are utilized. Odd harmonics are utilized because, theoretically, a square waveform may be produced exactly based upon an infinite number of odd harmonics and a rectified square wave is a flat line. In the present example, the rectified third and fifth harmonic of waveform 28 is added to result in waveform 32. Also illustrated in
As described in greater detail below in conjunction with
Thus, according to the teachings of the invention, a single stage power conversion from alternating current to in-line Ethernet power may be effected. According to the described embodiment, a predistortion compensator is utilized to address deficiencies in the waveform that would otherwise require too costly filtering. Some embodiments of such an approach result in power converters that are less costly and require less space than conventional counterparts.
Thus, power conversion may occur through using predistortion compensation in combination with other components to create distortions in the power waveform that allow the use of fewer components and stages than conventional power conversion by making more effective use of the input and output filters. In some embodiments this can be achieved with input and output filters that are not too costly. As a parallel task, a controller, such as controller 18, may monitor the output current or voltage to detect presence of an inline power device, a legacy device, short circuit, or open circuit. Controller 18 may force the setpoint input 48 of pulse width modulator 162 (
In one embodiment, predistortion compensation spreads the energy in power signal 28 across many harmonics. This reduces the energy in the fundamental frequency component, moving the energy to higher frequency components, which are much easier to filter.
If controller 18 detects an in-line power device, it outputs predistortion compensation signal 48 to the setpoint input of pulse width modulator 162 of predistortion compensation and per port conditioning block 20 (
Measuring the output voltage at node 178 by detector 172 and current through switch 164 determines the impedance of load 170. The impedance of load 170 indicates if an in-line power device or a legacy device or legacy device is connected to port 34. Legacy devices have a relatively small input resistance such as 150 ohms, whereas in-line power devices have a relatively large input signature resistance such as 25 Kilohms. Controller 18 enables power at the output by applying a predistorted compensation signal over line 48 to the setpoint input of pulse width modulator 162. If a zero volt signal is applied to setpoint input 48 of pulse width modulator 162, the power to load 170 is turned off, preventing damage to a legacy device.
Although some embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4131767 | Weinstein | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4161719 | Parikh et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4232199 | Boatwright et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4397020 | Howson | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4532626 | Flores et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4599494 | Welty | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4626954 | Damiano et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4710949 | Ahuja | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4723267 | Jones et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4875223 | Curtis | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4969179 | Kanare et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5029201 | Bindels | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5034948 | Mizutani et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5056131 | Kanare et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| RE33900 | Howson | Apr 1992 | E |
| 5199049 | Wilson | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5223806 | Curtis et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5285144 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5311518 | Takato et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5321372 | Smith | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5406260 | Cummings et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5541957 | Lau | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5574748 | Vander Mey et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5612580 | Janonis et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5655077 | Jones et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659542 | Bell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5671354 | Ito et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5684950 | Dare et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5796185 | Takata et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799040 | Lau | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5802042 | Natarajan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815665 | Teper et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5918016 | Brewer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5944824 | He | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947773 | Karam | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5991885 | Chang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994998 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6011910 | Chau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021496 | Dutcher et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6047376 | Hosoe | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6092196 | Reiche | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6115468 | De Nicolo | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6134666 | De Nicolo | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140911 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141227 | Sheikh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6218930 | Katzenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6295356 | De Nicolo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6308240 | De Nicolo | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310781 | Karam | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6347949 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6348874 | Cole et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6535983 | McCormack et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6541878 | Diab | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6678176 | Lumsden | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6704213 | Steimer | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6762675 | Cafiero et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6804351 | Karam | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 20020063584 | Molenda et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180592 | Gromov | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20040002319 | Lin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040156496 | Karam | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040164619 | Parker et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050276023 | Zansky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 9953408 | Oct 1999 | WO |