Method and system for coordinated data execution using a primary graphics processor and a secondary graphics processor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8749561
  • Patent Number
    8,749,561
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 14, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 10, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method and system for coordinated data execution in a computer system. The system includes a first graphics processor coupled to a first memory and a second graphics processor coupled to a second memory. A graphics bus is configured to couple the first graphics processor and the second graphics processor. The first graphics processor and the second graphics processor are configured for coordinated data execution via communication across the graphics bus.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the present invention pertains to digital electronic computer systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system for coordinating the operation of multiple graphics processor units within a computer system.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Digital computers are, being used today to perform a wide variety of tasks. A primary means for interfacing a computer system with its user is through its graphics display. The graphical depiction of data, through, for example, full motion video, detailed true color images, photorealistic 3-D modeling, and the like, has become a preferred mechanism for presenting complex data to the user. Increasing the performance and/or the realism of interactive three-dimensional images and scenes has become a primary driver for the increasing performance of newer computer systems.


Generally, a desktop computer system equipped to handle 3-D image data includes a specialized graphics processor unit, or GPU, in addition to the traditional CPU. The GPU includes specialized hardware configured to handle 3-D computer-generated objects. In a typical 3D computer generated object, the surfaces of the 3D object are described by data models. The GPU is configured to operate on these data models and their constituent “primitives” (usually mathematically described polygons and polyhedra) that define the shape of the object, the object attributes, and the connectivity and positioning data describing how the objects fit together. Generally, the component polygons and polyhedra connect at common edges defined in terms of common vertices and enclosed volumes. The hardware of the GPU processes the objects, implementing the calculations required to produce the realistic 3-D images. The GPU processing results in the polygons being texture mapped, Z-buffered, and shaded onto an array of pixels, creating the realistic 3D image.


In a typical graphics computer system, most of the processor intensive rendering computations are performed by the GPU included in the computer system. For example, the 3D object data models are “traversed” by a graphics driver software program (e.g., in response to user input) running on both the GPU and CPU of the computer system. Generally, the primitives describing the 3D object are processed by the CPU and sent to the GPU for rendering. For example, a 3D polyhedra model of an object is sent to the GPU as contiguous strips of polygons, comprising a graphics data stream (e.g., primitives, rendering commands, instructions, etc.). This graphics data stream provides the GPU with the information required to render the 3D object and the resulting scene. Such information includes, for example, specular highlighting, anti-aliasing, depth, transparency, and the like. Using this information, the GPU performs all the computational processing required to realistically render the 3D object. The hardware of the GPU is specially tuned to perform such processing quickly and efficiently in comparison to the CPU.


The performance of a typical graphics rendering process as implemented on a graphics computer system is highly dependent upon the performance of the underlying hardware. High performance graphics rendering requires high data transfer bandwidth to the memory storing the 3-D object data and the constituent primitives. Thus, typical prior art GPU subsystems (e.g., GPU equipped graphics cards) typically include a specialized high bandwidth local graphics memory for feeding the required data to the GPU.


A problem with the typical prior art GPU subsystems is the fact that the data transfer bandwidth to the system memory, or main memory, of a computer system is much less than the data transfer bandwidth to the local graphics memory. A GPU subsystem needs to communicate with system memory in order to exchange data with the CPU and interact with programs executing on the CPU. This communication occurs across a graphics bus, or the bus that connects the graphics subsystem to the CPU and system memory. For example, 3-D objects and their primitives need to be transferred from a program executing on the CPU and on system memory into the local graphics memory of the graphics subsystem for rendering. The low data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus acts as a bottleneck on overall graphics rendering performance.


The problem with respect to the low data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus constricts the flow of data in both directions. For example, the low data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus acts as a bottleneck for those applications where data needs to be read back from the graphics subsystem to the CPU. Such applications include, for example, post-transform applications where 3-D object data after transformation needs to be read back to the CPU for use by programs executing on the CPU. Thus, even though the CPU is designed to have a very high data transfer bandwidth to system memory, programs executing on the CPU and the system memory are constricted by the very much lower data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus, as for example, a real-time 3-D application waits for post-transform information from the graphics subsystem.


Thus, what is required is a solution capable of overcoming the limitations imposed by the limited data transfer bandwidth of a graphics bus of a computer system. What is required is a solution that eliminates the bottleneck imposed by the much smaller data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus in comparison to the data transfer bandwidth of the GPU to local graphics memory and the CPU to system memory. The present invention provides a novel solution to the above requirements.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention provided a method and system for coordinated data execution using a primary graphics processor and a secondary graphics processor. Embodiments of the present invention overcome the limitations imposed by the limited data transfer bandwidth of a graphics bus of a computer system. Additionally, embodiments of the present invention eliminate the bottleneck imposed by the much smaller data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus in comparison to the data transfer bandwidth of the GPU to local memory and the CPU to system memory (e.g., a non-transitory computer readable information store)


In one embodiment, the present invention is implemented as a graphics computer system configured to implement a coordinated data execution process using two graphics processors. In this embodiment, the system includes a first graphics processor coupled to a first memory and a second graphics processor coupled to a second memory. A graphics bus is configured to couple the first graphics processor and the second graphics processor. The first graphics processor and the second graphics processor are configured for coordinated data execution via communication across the graphics bus.


In one embodiment, the first memory comprises a local graphics memory and the second memory comprises a system memory. The first graphics processor can be detachably coupled to the graphics bus by a connector. The second graphics processor can be integrated with a memory controller for the system memory. The first and second graphics processors function together in a coordinated manner to minimize the amount of data that is required to be transferred across the graphics bus.


In one embodiment, the first graphics processor is a detachable GPU equipped graphics card configured to perform those graphics operations that are most suited to the very high data transfer bandwidth between the first graphics processor and local graphics memory. The second graphics processor is an integrated graphics processor (e.g., an iGPU) within a Northbridge configured to perform those graphics operations that are most suited to the very high data transfer bandwidth between the second graphics processor and system memory.


In this manner, the coordinated operation of the first graphics processor and the second graphics processor reduces the amount of data required for transfer across the graphics bus, and thereby overcomes the limitations imposed by the limited data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 shows a basic system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows a more detailed system including a memory controller in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows an integrated graphics processor system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 shows a diagram depicting the software interaction of a coordinated GPU execution process of a system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 shows a diagram of a system including a card-mounted GPU in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows a flow chart of the steps of a coordinated graphics rendering process in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.


Embodiments of the present invention provided a method and system for coordinated data execution using a primary graphics processor and a secondary graphics processor. Embodiments of the present invention overcome the limitations imposed by the limited data transfer bandwidth of a graphics bus of a computer system. Additionally, embodiments of the present invention eliminate the bottleneck imposed by the much smaller data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus in comparison to the data transfer bandwidth of the GPU to local graphics memory and the CPU to system memory. Embodiments of the present invention and their benefits are further described below.



FIG. 1 through FIG. 3 show example configurations of computer systems in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 1, FIG. 1 shows a system 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 1 depicts a basic configuration of a system for implementing coordinated data execution using a first graphics processor 130 and a second graphics processor 120. As depicted in FIG. 1, system 100 includes a CPU 110 and a memory 125 coupled to the graphics processor 120 and a memory 135 coupled to the graphics processor 130.


The graphics processors 120-130 communicate with each other across a graphics bus 115 to facilitate the coordinated processing. The system 100 embodiment performs graphics processing to support applications executing on the CPU 110. To implement the graphics processing, the processing workload is shared between the graphics processor 120 and the graphics processor 130. The graphics processing implemented on each of the graphics processors 120-130 is coordinated in order to minimize the impact of the limited data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus 115. The graphics processing can be shared between the graphics processors in order to exploit any parallelism, or concurrent execution properties, which may be present in an application.


The system 100 embodiment shows the memory 125 and the memory 135 for the graphics processors 120-130 respectively. In the present embodiment, the data transfer bandwidth of the busses between the graphics processor 120 and the memory 125 and between the graphics processor 130 and the memory 135 is much greater than the data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus 115.



FIG. 2 shows a system 200 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 depicts a more detailed configuration of a system for implementing coordinated data execution using a first graphics processor 230 and a second graphics processor 220. As depicted in FIG. 2, system 200 includes a CPU 210 and a memory 225 coupled to the GPU (graphics processor unit) 220 via a memory controller 211.


In the system 200 embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the first memory comprises a local graphics memory 235 and the second memory comprises a system memory 225. A memory controller 211 provides the interconnection between the system memory 225, the CPU 210, and the GPU 220 through the busses 212-214. A graphics bus 215 provides the interconnection between the GPU 220, the system memory 225, and the CPU 210. A local graphics memory 235 is directly coupled to the GPU 230 via a local bus 231. The rendered 3-D images are sent to a coupled display 240 for display to the user.


As with the system 100 embodiment of FIG. 1, the graphics processors 220-230 communicate with each other across the graphics bus 215 to facilitate the coordinated processing. The system 200 embodiment performs coordinated graphics processing, wherein the workload between the graphics processor 220 and the graphics processor 230 is shared in order to minimize the impact of the lower data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus 215.


In this embodiment, the GPU 220 accesses the system memory 225 through the memory controller 211. The busses 212-214 are optimized high-speed busses configured to provide high data transfer bandwidth to the system memory 225. The GPU 230 accesses the local graphics memory 235 through an even higher performance local bus 231. The local bus 231 typically provides even greater data transfer bandwidth than the busses 212-214. In comparison, the graphics bus 215 is much slower than the local graphics bus 231 (e.g., an order of magnitude slower) and the busses 212-214.



FIG. 3 shows a system 300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 depicts a configuration of a system for implementing coordinated data execution wherein a second GPU 320 is integrated directly within the integrated circuit comprising a memory controller 311.


In this embodiment, the GPU 320 is integrated within the memory controller 311 and communicates with the system memory 325 across a system bus 313. The CPU communicates with the memory controller via a “front-side” bus 312. The memory controller 311 provides the communication pathway to the system memory 325 via the system bus 313.


As in the system 200 embodiment of FIG. 2, the busses 312-313 are high-speed busses. The GPU 330 communicates with a graphics memory 235 via a high-speed local bus 331 and the display 340 receives rendered graphics data from GPU 330 for display to the user. The graphics bus 315 is much slower than the local graphics bus 331 and the busses 312-313.


As with the system 200 embodiment of FIG. 2, the GPUs 320-330 communicate with each other across the graphics bus 315 to facilitate the coordinated processing. The system 300 embodiment performs coordinated graphics processing, wherein the workload between the graphics processor 320 and the graphics processor 330 is shared in order to minimize the impact of the lower data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus 315.



FIG. 4 shows a diagram depicting the software interaction of a coordinated GPU execution process of a system 400 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 4, a software application 450 is shown interacting with a graphics driver 460 as both of them execute within a CPU environment 410. The graphics driver 460 coordinates and dispatches the execution of the graphics processing by communicating with the GPU 420 and the GPU 430.


Referring still to FIG. 4, the system 400 embodiment shows the decisions the graphics driver 460 makes with regard to sharing the graphics processing load between the GPU 420 and the GPU 430. The system 400 embodiment shows an integrated GPU (iGPU) 420, similar to the integrated GPU 320 shown in FIG. 3. However, it should be noted that the system 400 embodiment is applicable to non-integrated GPUs, such as, the GPU 220 shown in FIG. 2. Accordingly, to aid the reader's understanding, the term primary GPU can be used to refer to the GPU coupled to a local graphics memory via a highly optimized, high-performance local bus (e.g., local bus 331 of FIG. 3) and the term secondary GPU can be used to refer to the GPU coupled to system memory.


In the system 400 embodiment, the graphics driver 460 splits the graphics processing workload in order to implement coordinated data execution using the primary graphics processor, in this case the GPU 430, and the secondary graphics processor, in this case the integrated GPU (iGPU) 420. The GPU 430 connects to a system memory controller across a graphics bus. The system memory controller is typically referred to as a Northbridge. The graphics bus is typically an industry standard AGP (accelerated graphics port) bus. The GPU 430 also communicates with the CPU 410, and thus the graphics driver 460 and the application 450, via the graphics bus. This is shown as the low bandwidth connections 415a and 415b. The GPU 430 is equipped for very high bandwidth communication with its local graphics memory 435, in the manner described above.


In the system 400 embodiment, the secondary graphics processor is integrated with the system memory controller on the same die, shown as iGPU 420. The iGPU 420 and GPU 430 communicate across the low bandwidth graphics bus, shown as the connection 415a. The iGPU 420 has a much faster access to system memory 425 in comparison to the GPU 430. This is due to the fact that the GPU 430 must transit the low bandwidth connection 415a of the graphics bus in order to access system memory 425.


In executing applications such as the application 450, (e.g., graphics rendering applications), the graphics driver 460 minimizes the penalties imposed by the low bandwidth connections 415a and 415b by coordinating the operation of the iGPU 420 and the GPU 430. In the present embodiment, graphics processing is apportioned between the iGPU 420 and the GPU 430 in order to best utilize their respective access speeds to the system memory 425 and local graphics memory 435, and in order to minimize the impact of the low bandwidth connections 415a-b to the GPU 430 (e.g., across the graphics bus). Additionally, communications bandwidth with the CPU 410 is much greater for the iGPU 420 (integrated in the memory controller) in comparison to the GPU 430.


The GPU 430 is typically a card-mounted GPU connected to an AGP slot of the graphics bus. The iGPU 420 is typically a more limited graphics processor integrated into the Northbridge chip. Such a configuration is shown in FIG. 5 below. The graphics driver software 460 is configured to implement load sharing between the GPU 430 and the iGPU 420 depending upon the type of data execution.


The iGPU 420 is well-suited for data execution of operations that occur in the first part of a graphics pipeline. Such operations include: transform, lighting, occlusion culling, back face culling, view frustrum culling, clipping, and the like. These operations reduce the amount of data required for transfer across the limited bandwidth of the graphics bus (e.g., low bandwidth connections 415a-b) to the GPU 430.


The iGPU 420 is also well-suited for pre-processing data operations which best utilize high communications bandwidth with system memory and/or the CPU 410 (e.g., high bandwidth connection 412), such as: texture map reordering, texture compression, decryption and/or decoding of video (e.g., MPEG-2, MPEG-4, etc.), and certain vertex shader operations.


The iGPU 420 can be used to process commands from a processing thread that is different from the thread the GPU 430 is processing. For example, the iGPU 420 can render text for a word processor, while the GPU 430 renders 3D images to a different window. In this manner, the parallelism provided by the separate iGPU 420 can be exploited by software applications (e.g., application 450).


The GPU 430 is well-suited for the traditional graphics rendering operations which require extremely high communications bandwidth with the local graphics memory 435 (e.g., anti-aliasing, etc.), or those graphics rendering operations which occur later in a graphics rendering pipeline (e.g., lighting, bump mapping, texture mapping, and the like). As described above, the local graphics bus between a GPU and its local graphics memory is a highly specialized, highly optimized bus. Such busses (e.g., local bus 331 shown in FIG. 3) can be 256 bits wide and can have more than 19 GB/sec of data transfer bandwidth.


It should be noted that the iGPU 420 can be a much smaller graphics processor than the GPU 430. For example, the iGPU 420 can be implemented as a relatively simple unit of hardware logic (e.g., a single shader unit) designed to function in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention (e.g., by reducing the amount of data required to be transferred across the graphics bus).


It should also be noted that the iGPU can be configured to use a portion of the system memory 425 as its dedicated local memory. For example, the graphics driver software 460, in conjunction with the memory management software of an operating system, will reserve a portion of system memory 425 for its own use as a local graphics memory.



FIG. 5 shows a diagram of a system 500 including a card mounted GPU in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5, a GPU 530 and its graphics memory 535 are mounted on a graphics card 537 and coupled to the graphics bus 515 of computer system 500 via a connector 536.


System 500 is substantially similar to system 400 of FIG. 4. System 500, however, explicitly shows the GPU 530 being card mounted and coupled to the graphics bus 515 via a detachable connector 536. In the present embodiment, the graphics card 537 is adapted to connect into an AGP slot-type connector 536. The graphics card 537 also connects to a display 540 (e.g., flat panel display, CRT display, etc.). In this embodiment, the graphics bus 515 is in accordance with a version of the AGP specification (AGP 4x, AGP 8x, etc.).


The iGPU 520 is integrated into a Northbridge memory controller chip 511, which connects to the CPU 510 and system memory 525. A “Southbridge” chip 560 connects to the Northbridge 511 and provides connectivity to the expansion busses 565. A plurality of optional peripheral devices 571-575 are connected to system 500 via the expansion busses 565 as shown.



FIG. 6 shows a flow chart of the steps of a process 600 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As depicted in FIG. 6, process 600 shows the operating steps of a coordinated graphics execution process as implemented on a iGPU-GPU equipped computer system (e.g., system 500 of FIG. 5).


Process 600 begins in step 601 where a 3-D graphics application is executed. The 3-D graphics application is primarily instantiated in system memory (e.g., system memory 525) and executes on the CPU (e.g., CPU 510). The graphics rendering operations of the application are handled through a graphics driver via the driver's API (application programming interface).


In step 602, the graphics operations are sent from the application to the graphics driver. The graphics operations are then divided into a first set of operations and a second set of operations. In the present embodiment, the first set of operations comprises those operations which occur earlier in a graphics rendering pipeline. As described above, such operations include, for example, transform, lighting, occlusion culling, back face culling, view frustrum culling, clipping, and the like. The first set of operations can also include certain pre-processing data operations which best utilize high communications bandwidth with system memory and/or the CPU. The second set of operations comprises those operations which occur later in a graphics rendering pipeline, such as, for example, anti-aliasing, lighting, bump mapping, and the like.


In step 603, the first set of graphics operations are sent to the secondary iGPU 520. In step 604 the second set of graphics operations are sent to the primary GPU 530. Then in step 605, the operation of the iGPU 520 and the GPU 530 is coordinated via communication across the graphics bus (e.g., graphics bus 515). As described above, the division of work between the primary and secondary GPUs minimizes the amount of data required to be transferred across the low bandwidth graphics bus 515.


Thus, embodiments of the present invention provided a method and system for coordinated data execution using a primary graphics processor and a secondary graphics processor. Embodiments of the present invention overcome the limitations imposed by the limited data transfer bandwidth of a graphics bus of a computer system. Additionally, embodiments of the present invention eliminate the bottleneck imposed by the much smaller data transfer bandwidth of the graphics bus in comparison to the data transfer bandwidth of the GPU to local graphics memory and the CPU to system memory.


The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A system for coordinated data execution in a computer system, comprising: a primary graphics processor coupled to a local graphics memory;an integrated graphics processor coupled to a system memory;a graphics bus coupling the primary graphics processor and the integrated graphics processor, wherein the primary graphics processor and the integrated graphics processor are configured for coordinated data execution via communication across the graphics bus and for selectively allocating a first portion of graphics processing operations to the primary graphics processor and a second portion of graphics processing operations to the secondary graphics processor for execution to render a 3-D display, and wherein the integrated graphics processor is allocated transform and lighting operations, and wherein the secondary graphics processor utilizes a high communications bandwidth with system memory to implement texture map reordering, texture compression, decryption and decoding of video.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the integrated graphics processor is integrated into a North bridge of the computer system.
  • 3. The system of claim 2 wherein the integrated graphics processor is configured to use a portion of system memory for dedicated local memory.
  • 4. The system of claim 2 wherein the primary graphics processor is detachably coupled to the graphics bus by a connector.
  • 5. The system of claim 2 wherein the primary graphics processor is configured to communicate with the local graphics memory via a high speed local bus and the integrated graphics processor is configured to communicate with the system memory via a high speed system memory bus, wherein the primary graphics processor communicates with the integrated graphics processor via a low speed graphics bus.
  • 6. The system of claim 2 wherein the integrated graphics processor is configured to perform graphics processing operations that occur in a first portion of a graphics rendering pipeline.
  • 7. The system of claim 2 wherein the primary graphics processor is configured to perform graphics processing operations that occur in a second portion of a graphics rendering pipeline.
  • 8. The system of claim 2 wherein the primary graphics processor is configured to process commands from a thread that is different from a thread being processed by the integrated graphics processor.
  • 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the integrated graphics processor comprises at least one shader unit.
  • 10. A dual GPU (graphics processor unit) system for coordinated graphics data execution, comprising: a first GPU capable of performing independent graphics processing coupled to a local graphics memory;a second GPU capable of performing independent graphics processing coupled to a system memory, the second GPU integrated with a memory controller;a graphics bus coupling the first GPU and the second GPU, wherein the first GPU and the second GPU are configured for coordinated parallel data execution via communication across the graphics bus, and wherein the coordinated parallel data execution is selectively allocating a first portion of graphics operations to the first GPU and a second portion of graphics operations to the second GPU to render a 3-D display, wherein the second GPU is allocated transform and lighting operations, and wherein the secondary graphics processor utilizes a high communications bandwidth with system memory to implement texture map reordering, texture compression, decryption and decoding of video.
  • 11. The system of claim 10 wherein the second GPU is integrated with a North bridge of the computer system.
  • 12. The system of claim 11 wherein the North bridge is coupled to the system memory via a system bus and the North bridge is coupled to a CPU via a front-side bus.
  • 13. The system of claim 10 wherein the first GPU is a graphics card mounted GPU and the graphics card is detachably coupled to the graphics bus by a connector.
  • 14. The system of claim 10 wherein the graphics bus is in accordance with a version of an AGP standard.
  • 15. The system of claim 10 wherein the first GPU includes a plurality of shader units and is configured to perform graphics processing operations that occur in a second portion of a graphics rendering pipeline.
  • 16. The system of claim 15 wherein the graphics operations that occur in the second portion of the graphics pipeline includes anti-aliasing, bump mapping, or texture mapping.
  • 17. The system of claim 10 wherein the second GPU is configured to perform graphics processing operations that occur in a first portion of a graphics rendering pipeline.
  • 18. The system of claim 17 wherein the graphics operations that occur in the first portion of the pipeline includes back face culling, occlusion culling, view frustrum culling, transform, or lighting.
  • 19. The system of claim 10 wherein the second GPU is configured to perform pre-processing operations in conjunction with a CPU.
  • 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the pre-processing operations includes texture map reordering, texture compression, or video decoding.
  • 21. A method for coordinated data execution using a primary graphics processor and a secondary graphics processor, comprising: executing a graphics application;executing a graphics driver for interfacing with the graphics application;dividing graphics operations from the application into a first set of operations and a second set of operations;processing the first set of operations using a primary graphics processor; andprocessing the second set of operations using a secondary graphics processor, wherein the secondary graphics processor is integrated with a North bridge of the computer system, and wherein the primary graphics processor and the secondary graphics processor are coupled via a graphics bus for coordinated data execution by the primary graphics processor and the secondary graphics processor executing graphics commands cooperatively and in parallel to render a 3-D display, and wherein the secondary graphics processor is allocated transform and lighting graphics processing, and wherein the secondary graphics processor utilizes a high communications bandwidth with system memory to implement texture map reordering, texture compression, decryption and decoding of video.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the primary graphics processor is coupled to a local graphics memory and the secondary graphics processor is configured to use a portion of a system memory for a dedicated local graphics memory.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein the secondary graphics processor communicates with a CPU of the computer system via a front side bus.
  • 24. The method of claim 22 wherein the primary graphics processor is detachably coupled to the graphics bus by a connector.
  • 25. The method of claim 22 further comprising: performing graphics processing operations that occur in a first portion of a graphics rendering pipeline by using the secondary graphics processor, wherein the graphics operations that occur in the first portion of the pipeline includes back face culling, occlusion culling, view frustrum culling, transform, or lighting.
  • 26. The method of claim 22 further comprising: performing graphics processing operations that occur in a second portion of a graphics rendering pipeline by using the primary graphics processor, wherein the graphics operations that occur in the second portion of the graphics pipeline includes anti-aliasing, bump mapping, or texture mapping.
  • 27. The method of claim 21 wherein the primary graphics processor is configured to process commands from a thread that is different from a thread being processed by the secondary graphics processor.
  • 28. A non-transitory computer readable information store for implementing a method for coordinated data execution using a primary graphics processor and a secondary graphics processor, the information store having computer readable code which when executed by a computer system cause the computer system to implement a method comprising: executing a graphics application;executing a graphics driver for interfacing with the graphics application;dividing graphics operations from the application into a first set of operations and a second set of operations as determined by the graphics driver;processing the first set of operations using a primary graphics processor; andprocessing the second set of operations using a secondary graphics processor, wherein the secondary graphics processor is integrated into a North bridge of the computer system, and wherein the primary graphics processor and the secondary graphics processor are coupled via a graphics bus for coordinated graphics processing execution by the primary graphics processor and the secondary graphics processor executing graphics commands cooperatively and in parallel to render a 3-D display, and wherein the primary graphics processor and the secondary graphics processor are each capable of performing independent graphics processing, and wherein the primary graphics processor performs graphics processing operations that occur in a second portion of a graphics rendering pipeline and the secondary graphics processor performs graphics processing operations that occur in a first portion of the graphics rendering pipeline, said first portion including transform and lighting operations, and wherein the secondary graphics processor utilizes a high communications bandwidth with system memory to implement texture map reordering, texture compression, decryption and decoding of video.
  • 29. The non-transitory computer readable information store of claim 28 wherein the primary graphics processor is coupled to a local graphics memory and the secondary graphics processor is configured to use a portion of a system memory as a dedicated local graphics memory.
  • 30. The non-transitory computer readable information store of claim 29 wherein the graphics bus is an AGP graphics bus.
  • 31. The non-transitory computer readable information store of claim 29 wherein the primary graphics processor is detachably coupled to the graphics bus by a connector.
  • 32. The non-transitory computer readable information store of claim 28 wherein the graphics processing operations that occur in the first portion of the pipeline includes back face culling, occlusion culling, view frustrum culling, transform, or lighting.
  • 33. The non-transitory computer readable information store of claim 28 wherein the graphics processing operations that occur in the second portion of the graphics pipeline includes anti-aliasing, bump mapping, or texture mapping.
  • 34. The non-transitory computer readable information store of claim 28 wherein the primary graphics processor is configured to process commands from a thread that is different from a thread being processed by the secondary graphics processor.
US Referenced Citations (146)
Number Name Date Kind
4603400 Daniels Jul 1986 A
4955066 Notenboom Sep 1990 A
5016001 Minagawa et al. May 1991 A
5321510 Childers et al. Jun 1994 A
5371847 Hargrove Dec 1994 A
5461679 Normile et al. Oct 1995 A
5517612 Dwin et al. May 1996 A
5687334 Davis et al. Nov 1997 A
5712995 Cohn Jan 1998 A
5768164 Hollon, Jr. Jun 1998 A
5781199 Oniki et al. Jul 1998 A
5841435 Dauerer et al. Nov 1998 A
5878264 Ebrahim Mar 1999 A
5900913 Tults May 1999 A
5917502 Kirkland et al. Jun 1999 A
5923307 Hogle, IV Jul 1999 A
5978042 Vaske et al. Nov 1999 A
6008809 Brooks Dec 1999 A
6018340 Butler et al. Jan 2000 A
6025853 Baldwin Feb 2000 A
6075531 DeStefano Jun 2000 A
6078339 Meinerth et al. Jun 2000 A
6191758 Lee Feb 2001 B1
6208273 Dye et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226237 Chan et al. May 2001 B1
6259460 Gossett et al. Jul 2001 B1
6337747 Rosenthal Jan 2002 B1
6359624 Kunimatsu Mar 2002 B1
6388671 Yoshizawa et al. May 2002 B1
6473086 Morein et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480198 Kang Nov 2002 B2
6483502 Fujiwara Nov 2002 B2
6498721 Kim Dec 2002 B1
6557065 Peleg et al. Apr 2003 B1
6600500 Yamamoto Jul 2003 B1
6628243 Lyons et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630943 Nason et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654826 Cho et al. Nov 2003 B1
6657632 Emmot et al. Dec 2003 B2
6724403 Santoro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6753878 Heirich et al. Jun 2004 B1
6774912 Ahmed et al. Aug 2004 B1
6784855 Matthews et al. Aug 2004 B2
6816977 Brakmo et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832269 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6832355 Duperrouzel et al. Dec 2004 B1
6956542 Okuley et al. Oct 2005 B2
7007070 Hickman Feb 2006 B1
7010755 Anderson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7030837 Vong et al. Apr 2006 B1
7034776 Love Apr 2006 B1
7124360 Drenttel et al. Oct 2006 B1
7129909 Dong et al. Oct 2006 B1
7212174 Johnston et al. May 2007 B2
7269797 Bertocci et al. Sep 2007 B1
7359998 Chan et al. Apr 2008 B2
7486279 Wong et al. Feb 2009 B2
7509444 Chiu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7552391 Evans et al. Jun 2009 B2
7558884 Fuller et al. Jul 2009 B2
7612783 Koduri et al. Nov 2009 B2
8176155 Yang et al. May 2012 B2
20010028366 Ohki et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020087225 Howard Jul 2002 A1
20020129288 Loh et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140627 Ohki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163513 Tsuji Nov 2002 A1
20020182980 Van Rompay Dec 2002 A1
20020186257 Cadiz et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030016205 Kawabata et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025689 Kim Feb 2003 A1
20030041206 Dickie Feb 2003 A1
20030065934 Angelo et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088800 Cai May 2003 A1
20030090508 Keohane et al. May 2003 A1
20030126335 Silvester Jul 2003 A1
20030188144 Du et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030189597 Anderson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195950 Huang et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030197739 Bauer Oct 2003 A1
20030200435 England et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030222876 Giemborek et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001069 Snyder et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019724 Singleton et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040027315 Senda et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040080482 Magendanz et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040085328 Maruyama et al. May 2004 A1
20040184523 Dawson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040222978 Bear et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040224638 Fadell et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225901 Bear et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225907 Jain et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040235532 Matthews et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040268004 Oakley Dec 2004 A1
20050025071 Miyake et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050059346 Gupta et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050064911 Chen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050066209 Kee et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050073515 Kee et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050076088 Kee et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050076256 Fleck et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050097506 Heumesser May 2005 A1
20050140566 Kim et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050182980 Sutardja Aug 2005 A1
20050240538 Ranganathan Oct 2005 A1
20050262302 Fuller et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060001595 Aoki Jan 2006 A1
20060007051 Bear et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060085760 Anderson et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095617 Hung May 2006 A1
20060119537 Vong et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060119538 Vong et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060119602 Fisher et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125784 Jang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129855 Rhoten et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060130075 Rhoten et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060150230 Chung et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060164324 Polivy et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060232494 Lund et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250320 Fuller et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267857 Zhang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267987 Litchmanov Nov 2006 A1
20060267992 Kelley et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282855 Margulis Dec 2006 A1
20070046562 Polivy et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070052615 Van Dongen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067655 Shuster Mar 2007 A1
20070079030 Okuley et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070083785 Sutardja Apr 2007 A1
20070103383 Sposato et al. May 2007 A1
20070195007 Bear et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070273699 Sasaki et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080130543 Singh et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155478 Stross Jun 2008 A1
20080172626 Wu Jul 2008 A1
20080297433 Heller et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080320321 Sutardja Dec 2008 A1
20090021450 Heller et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031329 Kim Jan 2009 A1
20090059496 Lee Mar 2009 A1
20090160865 Grossman Jun 2009 A1
20090172450 Wong et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193243 Ely Jul 2009 A1
20100010653 Bear et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100033433 Utz et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100033916 Douglas et al. Feb 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2005026918 Mar 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (24)
Entry
Nerheim-Wolfe, R. Overview of Aliasing in Computer Graphics. 1993. 1993 ACM SIGGRAPH Education Slide Set. http://www.siggraph.org/education/materials/HyperGraph/aliasing/alias0.htm.
Breitfelder, K.; Messina, D. The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms. 2000. IEEE Press. Seventh Edition, p. 144, 1037.
“Front side bus.” http://www.answers.com/topic/front-side-bus.
“AGP—Accelerated Graphics Port.” http://www.sysopt.com/agp.html.
“Usage: NVIDIA GeForce 6800—PCIe x16”, Dell, archived Jan. 15th, 2006 by archive.org, Downloaded Jun. 29, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20060115050119/http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/video/P82192/en/usage.htm.
“Graphics: Intel® 82852/82855 Graphics Controller Family”, Intel, Archived Nov. 2, 2006 by archive.org, Downloaded Jun. 30, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20061103045644/http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/inte1852gm/sb/CS-009064.htm?.
“Epson: EMP Monitor V4.10 Operation Guide”, by Seiko Epson Corp., 2006, http://support.epson.ru/products/manuals/100396/Manual/EMPMonitor.pdf.
“The Java Tutorial: How to Use Combo Boxes”, Archived Mar. 5, 2006 by archive.org, Downloaded Jun. 30, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20050305000852/http://www-mips.unice.fr/Doc/Java/Tutorial/uiswing/components/combobox.html.
“System Management Bus (SMBus) Specification,” Version 2.0, Aug. 3, 2000; pp. 1-59.
Handtops.com, “FlipStart PC in Detail” pp. 1-4, downloaded from the internet o Sep. 20, 2005 from http://www.handtops.com/show/news/5.
Microsoft Corporation, “Microsoft Windows Hardware Showcase”, dated Apr. 28, 2005; pp. 1-5; downloaded from the internet on Sep. 15, 2005, from http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/winhec/hwshowcase05.mspx.
Paul Thurrot's SuperSite for Windows, “WinHEC 2004 Longhorn Prototypes Gallery”, dated May 10, 2004, pp. 1-4, downloaded from the internet on Sep. 15, 2005 from http://www.sinwupersite.com/showcase.loghorn—winhc—proto.asp.
PCWorld.com, “Microsoft Pitches Display for Laptop Lids” dated Feb. 10, 2005, pp. 1-2, downloaded from the Internet on Mar. 8, 2006 from http://www.pcworld.com/resources/article/aid/119644.asp.
Vulcan Inc., “Connectivity FAQ”, p. 1, downloaded from the internet on Sep. 20, 2005 from http://www.flipstartpc.com/faq—connectivity.asp.
Vulcan, Inc., “Product Features:LID Module”, p. 1, downloaded from the Internet on Sep. 19, 2005 from http://www.flipstartpc.com/aboutproduct—features—lidmodule.asp.
Vulcan, Inc., “Product Features: Size and performanc”, p. 1; downloaded from the internet on Sep. 20, 2005 from http://www.flipstartpc.com/aboutproduct—features—sizeandpowerasp.
Vulcan, Inc., “Software FAQ”, p. 1, downloaded from the internet on Sep. 20, 2005 from http://www.flipstartpc.com/faq—software.asp.
Andrew Fuller; “Auxiliary Display Platform in Longhorn”; Microsoft Corporation; The Microsoft Hardware Engineering Conference Apr. 25-27, 2005; slides 1-29.
Compaq et al.; “Universal Serial Bus Specification”; Apr. 27, 2000; Revision 2.0; chapters 1-4 and 10.
“Epson; EMP Monitor V4, 10 Operation Guide”, by Seiko Epson Corp., 2006 http://support.epson.ru/products/manuals/100396/Manual/EMPMonitor.pdf.
“Graphics: Intel 82852/82855 Graphics Controller Family”, Intel, Archived November 2, 206 by Archive.Org, Downloaded Jun. 30, 2011, http://Web.Archive.Org/Web/20061103045644/http:// Support.Epson.Ru/Products/Manuals/100396/Manual/Empmonitor.Pdf.
“Virtual Network Computing”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vnc, Downloaded Circa: Dec. 18, 2008, pp. 1-4.
“The Java Tutorial: How to Use Combo Boxes”, Archived Mar. 5, 2006 by archive.org, Downloaded Jun. 30, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20050305000852/http://www.mips.unice.fr/Doc/Java/Tutorial/uiswing/components/combobox.html.
“Usage: Nvidia Geforce 6800-PCIE X16”, Dell, Archived Jan. 15, 2006 by Archive.org, Downloaded Jun. 29, 2011, http://Web.Archive.org/Web/20060115050119/http://SUPPOT.Dell.com/Support/Edocs/Video/P82192/En/Usage.htm.