1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to systems and methods of processing contaminated sands. More specifically, embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and methods for processing contaminated sands recovered from production waste pits. More specifically still, embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and methods for separating hydrocarbons and naturally occurring radioactive material and removing calcium scale and calcium carbonate from contaminated sands recovered from production waste pits.
2. Background Art
Oil-based sludges of various types and consistencies are commonly generated as waste streams during oil or other hydrocarbon production processes. These sludges arise during well tests and initial production, as a by-product waste stream of hydrocarbon production, and as tank bottom sediments. The basic components of sludges are hydrocarbon oils of various consistencies, water, and solids of an inorganic and organic nature. To dispose of the waste, sludge is often stored in open pits where it may be left for considerable time before being treated. The basic components of sludges are hydrocarbon oils of various consistencies, water, and solids of an inorganic and organic nature. Oil-based sludge typically refers to a complex water-in-oil emulsion stabilized by salts of organic compounds and fine solids. The oil phase contains a complex mixture of hydrocarbons of various consistencies including waxes and asphaltenes which may be solid or semi-solid at ambient temperature.
Produced water may also have been added to waste pits. Produced water often includes radioactive material and carbonate scale. These materials can leach into the sand surrounding the pit thereby contaminating the sand underlying the waste pits.
Currently, treatment of sludge is a major operational cost for producers. Sludge is collected, stored, and then disposed of in tanks or delivered to a sludge pit. One challenge of sludge treating systems is that the recovery of marketable oil from the sludge is generally not cost-effective and thus not commercially viable. Due to wide variability in sludge composition, different sludge processing systems may be needed to optimize the processing of sludge for recovering oil of sufficient quality in a cost efficient manner. The quality of oil is frequently characterized by its Basic Sediment and Water (BS&W) content, in vol. %. The current marketable BS&W of recovered oil is less than about 2 vol. %. Furthermore, it is desirable to treat pit sludge to reduce the risk of contamination of the surrounding pit area, in accordance with increasingly strict environmental regulations, as well as decrease the overall waste volume, and ultimately to permit pit closure.
Underlying the sludge in the open pit is often sand that is contaminated with hydrocarbons, calcium carbonate and naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM). To close a pit site, it is desirable to remove the contaminants from the sand and return the decontaminated sand to the pit.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a method for treating contaminated sand from a production waste pit. The method includes pre-treating the contaminated sand to remove at least a portion of the non-radioactive contaminates, washing the contaminated sand with a dissolver solution and water to remove naturally occurring radioactive material from the sand, recovering the dissolver solution from the sand, and collecting the treated sand.
In another aspect embodiments disclosed herein relate to a system for treating contaminated sand from a production waste pit. In one embodiment, the system includes a hopper within which the contaminated sand and heated water are slurried, a hydrocyclone receiving the slurried sand, an Elutriation column receiving the sand from the hydrocyclone and removing hydrocarbon from the sand, a calcium carbonate removal system receiving the sand from the Elutriation column, a reactor receiving the sand from the calcium carbonate removal system, wherein the sand and a dissolver solution are reacted within the reactor to remove naturally occurring radioactive material from the sand, a dissolver regeneration vessel within which the spent dissolver solution from the reactor and a brine are mixed, a dosing pump for adding acid to the dissolver regeneration vessel, a dosing pump for adding base to the dissolver regeneration vessel, and a separation tank for treating waste water from the hydrocyclone and dissolver regeneration vessel.
Other aspects and advantages of the claimed subject matter will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to systems and methods of processing contaminated sands. More specifically, embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and methods for processing contaminated sands recovered from production waste pits. More specifically still, embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and methods for separating hydrocarbons and naturally occurring radioactive material from contaminated sands recovered from production waste pits.
After treatment of an upper hydrocarbon layer of a production waste pit (not shown), underlying sand may be decontaminated. This layer of untreated contaminated sand may contain hydrocarbon, calcium carbonate and naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), all of which should be removed to produce cleaned sand to backfill and close the pit site.
It is advantageous to reuse the material used to remove the NORM from the sand. By recycling the material, less material is required to treat the sand underlying a pit and, therefore, the costs associated with treating the sand are reduced. Further, reuse of the NORM dissolver reduces the volume of NORM waste generated. It is further advantageous to treat and reuse the water used throughout the process so that additional fresh water is not constantly added to the system. In addition to lowering costs by reducing the amount of fresh water required to treat a pit, contaminated water is not released to the environment.
Referring to
The pre-treatment process removes some non-radioactive components from the contaminated sand before subjecting the sand to the NORM dissolution process. In some embodiments, pre-treatment may include removing a hydrocarbon component from the contaminated sand, removing a calcium carbonate component from the sand, or both. Referring to
Contaminated sand 20 will be excavated from the pits and discharged into a feed hopper 22. The feed hopper 22 may have a top grating (not shown) with a large diameter mesh to remove foreign objects or large particles prior to entering the process stream. Water 24 is pumped through a heat exchanger 26 to increase the water's 24 temperature. A centrifugal pump 28 may be used to discharge the water 24 into the heat exchanger 26. A second centrifugal pump 28′ may be included in the event that the first pump 28 is taken off line for maintenance or other reason. Other types of pumps may also be used to discharge the water 24 to the heat exchanger 26. In some embodiments, the temperature of the water 24 exiting the heat exchanger 26 is in the range of 60° to 95° C. In some embodiments, the temperature of the water 24 exiting the heat exchanger 26 is in the range of 75° to 85° C. In a preferred embodiment, the temperature of the water 24 exiting the heat exchanger 26 is approximately 80° C.
In circumstances where the concentration or quality of the hydrocarbon or the wettability of the sand particles 20 is such that hot water does not adequately remove the hydrocarbon from the sand 20, a chemical injection system (not shown) can be incorporated. In some embodiments, the chemical injection system may comprise a demulsifier and/or water wetting surfactant added to the sand 36 or the water 32.
A portion 32 of hot water passes through an eductor 34 or another type of mixing device, which is connected to the feed hopper 22. Where an eductor is used, the vacuum created by the wash water motive fluid 32 is sufficient to draw the contaminated sand 36 into the eductor 34. Another portion of wash water 38 is also injected into the hopper 22 to slurrify the untreated contaminated sand 20 for easier conveyance. The shear forces and chemical action are sufficient to separate the oil from the sand grains. The solution is then conveyed to a one or more hydrocyclones 40 where the solids and liquids are separated. The underflow 42 from the hydrocyclones 40 contains sand, NORM scale and any residual oil contamination. If additional hydrocarbon removal is required, in some embodiments the underflow 42 is discharged directly into Elutriation column 44. The sand particles settle through the Elutriation column 44 at the outer edge and a counter flow of a portion 46 of the hot wash water will further remove residual hydrocarbon from the particles. The water 46 is forced through a small diameter column resulting in a high upward flow at the centre of the column. At the column walls the flow rate is lower allowing the sand particles to settle. The wet, essentially hydrocarbon-free sand is conveyed via a screw conveyor 48 from the bottom of the Elutriation column 44 and enters the downstream acid-wash process 50. In an alternative embodiment, when additional hydrocarbon removal is not required, sand from the hydrocyclones 40 may be fed directly to a calcium carbonate removal stage 50 or 600 or to the NORM dissolution process 14. In another alternative embodiment to the Elutriation column, the sand from the hydrocyclones 40 may be rinsed by spraying (not shown) with water.
In one embodiment of the pre-treatment step, the sand 52 from the screw conveyor 48, having been cleaned of hydrocarbon, now can be treated to dissolve any calcium carbonate (calcite) present. In some embodiments, a screw conveyor 48 transfers the sand 52 into an acid wash reactor 54. This reactor has been filled with an acid solution via pump 56. The source of the acid solution could be fresh acid or acidic solutions collected from the NORM recycling process, described below. In some embodiments, the fresh acid is a solution of hydrochloric acid. But, other acids that react with calcite to form a water soluble salt may be used, including for example carboxylic acids and mineral acids. The amount of acid may chosen based on the amount of calcite present in sand and amount of fluid required to create a slurry with the sand. In some embodiments, the solution is approximately 25% by weight hydrochloric acid. The acid reacts with the calcium carbonate and is neutralized to form a calcium chloride brine solution. The carbon dioxide produced is vented from the acid wash reactor 54. The sand solution 58 from reactor 54 then passes over a screen 60, such as a shaker, and the cleaned sand 62 is collected. The liquid phase passing though screen 60 is collected in a catch tank 64 and pumped to a waste storage tank 66.
Referring now to
A separation tank 70 collects the overflow 72 from the hydrocyclones 40 and the overflow 74 from the Elutriation column 44. The oil and hydrocarbon phases separate under gravity in the separation tank 70. The oil phase 76 separated is pumped via a pump 78 to an oil storage tank 80 and the water phase 82 is recycled back via pumps 28, 28′ via line 83. Any settled solids 84 collected at the base of separation tank 70 are pumped to the waste water treatment process 18. Once the wash water becomes overly contaminated with oil or particles that cannot be removed and recycling the wash water becomes detrimental to the process efficiency, the wash water 85 is pumped from the separation tank 70 to the waste water treatment process 18 and a fresh batch of wash water is prepared.
Referring to
Exemplary chelating agents include polyaminocarboxylic acids, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA). In some embodiments, EDTA is the preferred chelating agent. The amount of chelating agent used may be based on the amount of NORM present in the contaminated sand and to reduce the amount of recycling of the dissolver that is necessary. Optionally, a converting agent may be combined with the chelating agent to assist with dissolving the NORM scale. The converting agent assists by converting barium sulphate on the surface of the sand particles to barium carbonate, which is more soluble than barium sulphate. This speeds up the overall dissolving of the NORM scale. One example of a suitable converting agents are carbonate salts (such as potassium carbonate). In some embodiments, the NORM dissolution process uses EDTA as the chelating agent and potassium carbonate as the converting agent.
Each dissolution reactor 90, 90′, 90″ may be charged via one or more common centrifugal pumps 92, 94 (shown on
The treated wet sand from the pre-treatment process 12 may be fed via a conveyance system into the dissolution reactors 90, 90′, 90″. In certain embodiments, the conveyance system is a pneumatic conveyance system 102, such as the ISO-PUMP™, available from M-I LLC of Houston, Tex. USA. Alternatively, the conveyance system may be an auger or other types of mechanical conveyers. In certain embodiments, the conveyance system will fill the dissolution reactors 90, 90′, 90″ over a period of about 1 hour per reactor tank. The fill time for each reactor 90, 90′, 90″ may be varied based upon the amount of sand being processed and the capacities of the pumps and blowers associated with pneumatic conveyance system 102. In some embodiments, each reactor 90, 90′, 90″ is charged with a ratio of up to and including 2:1 dissolver to sand. In some embodiments, each reactor 90, 90′, 90″ is charged with a ratio of more than 2:1 dissolver to sand. An agitator 104, 104′, 104″ located within each reaction vessel 90, 90′, 90″ helps to maintain uniform temperature distribution and mixes the dissolver and sand. Once the required mass of the wet sand has been discharged, the residence time in each reactor 90, 90′, 90″ can be recorded. The reaction time required will be determined by the level of NORM contamination and the sand particle size and will vary between batches. The reaction is the process of chelating the NORM to dissolve it, and the reaction time is the time required to dissolve the NORM. Throughout the reaction, the mixture may be continuously agitated and pumped to circulate through the reactor 90, 90′, 90″ and heat exchanger 100, 100′, 100″ to maintain the desired temperature set point range. The dissolution reactors 90, 90′, 90″ may be coated and pipelines may be lagged to reduce temperature loss during the reaction.
Once the reaction is complete, each reaction vessel 90, 90′, 90″ is discharged in series. The treated sand-dissolver mixture is pumped through a heat exchanger 106 to cool the mixture 108 to a mean temperature. This cooled mixture 108 flows through a solid/liquid separator 110 whereby the solids 112 are separated from the liquid phase 114 through a screen and the solid sand overflow 112 may be discharged over a secondary solid/liquid separator 116. The liquid phase 114 is collected in a catch tank 118 and recycled back to the reactors 90, 90′, 90″ via a pump 92. If the liquid phase 114 is saturated with NORM then the dissolver chemical 96 will be transferred to the recycling process 16. At the second solid/liquid separator 116 water from a water wash system 117 assists to remove any residual dissolver solution from the solids and an overflow of cleaned and decontaminated sand 120 is produced. The wash water underflow 122 from the liquid/solid separator 116 is collected in catch tank 124 and re-used for further wash cycles or returned to the water treatment process 18.
Referring to
Saturated spent dissolver is pumped from one reaction vessel 90, 90′, 90″ into a dissolver regeneration vessel 126. Acid 142 is dosed into the dissolver regeneration vessel 126 to precipitate the NORM, the chelant, and other solids leaving a liquid brine phase. In some embodiments, the acid brings the pH down below 1, so a strong acid is preferred. However, in other embodiments a pH at or above 1 may also be effective to precipitate the chelating agent in its acid form. Hydrochloric acid is the preferred acid, but other acids may also be used to lower the pH and precipitate the chelating agent.
The solid precipitate settles to the base of the dissolver regeneration vessel 126 after which the liquid brine phase is pumped out via a pump 128. The brine directed through a filter 136 to remove any suspended solids. Non-regenerative filters may be used to remove suspended solids. The brine may then be pumped into a storage tank 130. In some embodiments, the acidified brine 130 may be used in the pre-treatment process 12 (
Fresh water 138 may be pumped into the dissolver regeneration vessel 126 and a base 140 added. The base may be added via a metered pump 132. The base raises the pH and preferably utilizes an alkali metal hydroxide (such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide), carbonate (such as potassium carbonate), or bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the base is added to raise the pH to about 10-12. The solution is agitated to re-dissolve the chelant into solution. The NORM solid particles remain in suspension, but do not re-dissolve. The solution containing NORM solid particles is pumped through a two stage filtration system 134, the first filtration stage removing coarse NORM particles, and the second filtration stage removing finer NORM particles. Once all the NORM particles have been removed, the liquid phase 144 is returned to the dissolver regeneration vessel 126. Base 140 and water 138 is added to reconstitute the dissolver chemical such that it can now be re-used and re-fill the NORM dissolution reactor vessels 90, 90′, 90″.
Referring to
A baffle plate and overflow weir may direct the water into the second compartment of the tank 150 where the remaining flocs are removed. A series of baffle plates extending about ¾ of the tank width allows for more settling time, also a gap between the sloped bottom and the baffle plates allows solids to settle and flow towards the suction point for the feed pump 154 to separator 152. The separator 152 receives the flocs from three different suction points at the bottom of the settling tank 150 and the dewatered overflow from the separator 152 will discharge back to the settling tank 150 and make the separation process a closed loop. A small water compartment in the end corner of the tank 150 will receive the separator overflow as well as additional water from the settling tank to make up for any limited separator capacity. The clean water supply from this compartment will be pumped back to the various processes via a filter 156 and buffer tank 158.
Many of the embodiments disclosed herein have the advantage of 24 hour operation.
While the claimed subject matter has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the claimed subject matter as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the claimed subject matter should be limited only by the attached claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2011/000178 | Feb 2011 | GB | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61303024 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13578280 | US | |
Child | 13850197 | US |