The present invention is generally related to hardware accelerated graphics computer systems.
Recent advances in computer performance have enabled graphic systems to provide more realistic graphical images using personal computers, home video game computers, handheld devices, and the like. In such graphic systems, a number of procedures are executed to “render” or draw graphic primitives to the screen of the system. A “graphic primitive” is a basic component of a graphic picture, such as a point, line, polygon, or the like. Rendered images are formed with combinations of these graphic primitives. Many procedures may be utilized to perform 3-D graphics rendering.
Specialized graphics processing units (e.g., GPUs, etc.) have been developed to optimize the computations required in executing the graphics rendering procedures. The GPUs are configured for high-speed operation and typically incorporate one or more rendering pipelines. Each pipeline includes a number of hardware-based functional units that are optimized for high-speed execution of graphics instructions/data, where the instructions/data are fed into the front end of the pipeline and the computed results emerge at the back end of the pipeline. The hardware-based functional units, cache memories, firmware, and the like, of the GPU are optimized to operate on the low-level graphics primitives (e.g., comprising “points”, “lines”, “triangles”, etc.) and produce real-time rendered 3-D images.
The real-time rendered 3-D images are generated using raster display technology. Raster display technology is widely used in computer graphics systems, and generally refers to the mechanism by which the grid of multiple pixels comprising an image are influenced by the graphics primitives. For each primitive, a typical rasterization system generally steps from pixel to pixel and determines whether or not to “render,” or write a given pixel into a frame buffer or pixel map, as per the contribution of the primitive. This, in turn, determines how to write the data to the display buffer representing each pixel.
Once the primitives are rasterized into their constituent pixels, these pixels are then processed in pipeline stages subsequent to the rasterization stage where the rendering operations are performed. Generally, these rendering operations assign a color to each of the pixels of a display in accordance with the degree of coverage of the primitives comprising a scene. The per pixel color is also determined in accordance with texture map information that is assigned to the primitives, lighting information, and the like.
A problem exists however with the ability of prior art 3-D rendering architectures to scale to handle the increasingly complex 3-D scenes of today's applications. Computer screens now commonly have screen resolutions of 1920×1200 pixels or larger. Traditional methods of increasing 3-D rendering performance, such as, for example, increasing clock speed, have negative side effects such as increasing power consumption and increasing the heat produced by the GPU integrated circuit die. Other methods for increasing performance, such as incorporating large numbers of parallel execution units for parallel execution of GPU operations have negative side effects such as increasing integrated circuit die size, decreasing yield of the GPU manufacturing process, increasing power requirements, and the like.
Thus, a need exists for a rasterization process that can scale as graphics application needs require and provide added performance without incurring penalties such as increased power consumption and/or reduced fabrication yield.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for deferred coverage mask generation in a raster stage of a graphics processor. Embodiments of the present invention implement a rasterization process that can scale as graphics application needs require and provide added performance without incurring penalties such as increased silicon die area, power consumption and/or reduced fabrication yield.
In one embodiment the present invention is implemented as a method for deferred coverage mask generation in a raster stage of a graphics processor. The method includes receiving a graphics primitive (e.g., triangle polygon) for rasterization in a raster stage of the graphics processor (e.g., GPU) and performing a bounding box test on the graphics primitive to define a bounding rectangle. A combined coverage mask is then generated after the completion of the bounding box test. The combined coverage mask indicates a plurality of pixels that are covered by the graphics primitive (e.g., those pixels that have at least some coverage from the graphics primitive). The combined coverage mask is divided into a plurality of sub-portions. In one embodiment, the sub-portions are allocated to a plurality of raster components for parallel rasterization to determine sub-pixel coverage for, the sub-portions.
In one embodiment, the bounding box test performed on the graphics primitive includes performing a scissors rectangle test, a viewpoint rectangle test, and a screen rectangle test. In one embodiment, a window clipping test on the graphics primitive and a depth cull test on the graphics primitive can be further performed prior to the generation of the combined coverage mask. Each of these tests comprise operations performed using rectangle constructs (e.g., as opposed to, for example, bit masks).
In one embodiment, a polygon stippling operation is performed on the graphics primitive prior to the generating of the combined coverage mask. Similarly, a window ID test can be performed on the graphics primitive prior to the generating of the combined coverage mask.
In this manner, embodiments of the present invention consolidate those operations which can reduce the scope of the pixel coverage (e.g., reduce the number of pixels turned on by the combined coverage mask) and implement such operations prior to the generation of the combined coverage mask. This increases the efficiency by reducing the number of components in which a coverage mask, or portions thereof, needs to be re-created, stored, and/or transmitted. The increased efficiency enables the rasterization process to readily scale in performance while minimizing penalties such as increased silicon die area, power consumption and/or reduced fabrication yield.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.
Notation and Nomenclature:
Some portions of the detailed descriptions, which follow, are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “accessing” or “executing” or “storing” or “rendering” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system (e.g., computer system 100 of
Computer System Platform:
System 100 can be implemented as, for example, a desktop computer system or server computer system having a powerful general-purpose CPU 101 coupled to a dedicated graphics rendering GPU 110. In such an embodiment, components can be, included that add peripheral buses, specialized audio/video components, IO devices, and the like. Similarly, system 100 can be implemented as a handheld device (e.g., cellphone, etc.) or a set-top video game console device such as, for example, the Xbox®, available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., or the PlayStation3®, available from Sony Computer Entertainment Corporation of Tokyo, Japan. System 100 can also be implemented as a “system on a chip”, where the electronics (e.g., the components 101, 115, 110, 114, and the like) of a computing device are wholly contained within a single integrated circuit die. Examples include a hand-held instrument with a display, a car navigation system, a portable entertainment system, and the like.
Embodiments of the present invention implement a method and system for deferred coverage mask generation in a raster stage of a graphics processor. The method includes receiving a graphics primitive for rasterization in a raster stage of a graphics processor and performing a bounding box test on the graphics primitive to define a bounding rectangle for the graphics primitive. A combined coverage mask is then generated after the completion of the bounding box test. The combined coverage mask indicates a plurality of pixels that are covered by the graphics primitive. The combined coverage mask is divided into a plurality of sub-portions. The sub-portions are allocated to a plurality of raster components to determine sub-pixel coverage for the sub-portions. Embodiments of the present invention and their advantages are further described below.
In one embodiment, as depicted in
Thus, as depicted in
Referring still to
Additional details regarding boustrophedonic pattern rasterization can be found in US Patent Application “A GPU HAVING RASTER COMPONENTS CONFIGURED FOR USING NESTED BOUSTROPHEDONIC PATTERNS TO TRAVERSE SCREEN AREAS” by Franklin C. Crow et al., Ser. No. 11/304,904, filed on Dec. 15, 2005, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
It should be noted that although embodiments of the present invention are described in the context of boustrophedonic rasterization, other types of rasterization patterns can be used. For example, the algorithms and GPU stages described herein for rasterizing tile groups can be readily applied to traditional left-to-right, line-by-line rasterization patterns.
As described above, the line 321 shows a boustrophedonic pattern of traversal, where the raster unit visits all pixels on a 2D area of the triangle 301 by scanning along one axis as each pass moves farther along on the orthogonal axis. In the
As described above, in one embodiment, the first level rasterization generates a tile (e.g., tile 401) comprising a set of pixels related to the graphics primitive (e.g., a tile that has at least some coverage with respect to the primitive). Generally, the first level rasterization is intended to quickly determine which pixels of the screen area relate to a given graphics primitive. Accordingly, relatively large groups of pixels (e.g., tiles) are examined at a time in order to quickly find those pixels that relate to the primitive. The process can be compared to a reconnaissance, whereby the coarse raster unit quickly scans a screen area and finds tiles that cover the triangle 301. Thus the pixels that relate to the triangle 301 can be discovered much more quickly than the traditional prior art process which utilizes a single level of rasterization and examines much smaller numbers of pixels at a time, in a more fine-grained manner.
In the
The window ID component 506 examines the tiles identified by the coarse raster component 503 and functions by turning off/on those pixels that are associated with a given window of interest. Such a window could comprise, for example, one of several windows on a computer screen as displayed by one or more applications, were each window is associated with a designated window identifier (e.g., window ID) as described in, for example, the OpenGL specification.
The window ID component 506 compiles per pixel information into a coverage mask which defines whether the individual pixels of the tile are on/off. The window ID component 506 further operates by generating a combined coverage mask which further incorporates the information from the depth cull component 505 with respect to which pixels of the tile are turned on/off.
In one embodiment, the window ID component 506 can determine which sub-portions of a tile identified by the coarse raster unit are turned off and can discard those sub-portions. This reduces the amount of work that must be performed by the fine raster component 504. For example, in a case where the coarse raster component 503 works with tiles comprising 1024 pixels (e.g., a 32×32 block of pixels), the tile can be subdivided into, for example, 16 sub-portions of 64 pixels each (e.g., 8×8 blocks of pixels). Those sub-portions having all of their constituent pixels turned off as indicated by the combined coverage mask can be completely discarded. Those sub-portions having at least some coverage are passed on to the fine raster component 504. The functionality of the window ID component 506 is further described in
Once the related tiles are identified by the coarse raster component 503, and those sub-portions of the tile that are turned off are discarded by the window ID component 506, the fine raster component 504 examines each of the sub-portions and individually identifies the pixels that are covered by the primitive. Hence, in such an embodiment, the coarse raster component 503 rapidly searches a grid of pixels by using tiles, and the fine raster component 504 uses the information generated by the coarse raster component 503 and implements fine granularity rasterization by individually identifying pixels covered by the primitive. In one embodiment, the fine raster component 504 can implement subpixel coverage by examining subpixel sample points within each pixel.
Referring still to
In one embodiment, the hardware comprising the raster unit 502 is optimized for operations on a per clock basis. For example, to provide high throughput and thereby maintain high rendering frame rates, the coarse raster component 503 and the fine raster component 504 comprise hardware designed to implement the first level rasterization and the second level rasterization on a per-clock cycle basis. The raster unit 502 can be implemented such that the first level rasterization is implemented in the coarse raster component 503 that “stamps out” tiles covering a given primitive within a single clock cycle. Subsequently, the rasterization at the second level can be implemented in the fine raster component 504 that stamps out the covered pixels of a tile in a single clock cycle.
In one embodiment, the first level rasterization is performed by the coarse rasterization component 503 and the related sub-portions are output for rasterization at a second-level at the fine raster component 504. In this manner, embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for a rasterization process that can scale as graphics application needs require and provide added performance without incurring penalties such as increased power consumption and/or reduced fabrication yield.
Additional descriptions regarding parallel fine rasterization can be found in the commonly assigned United States Patent Application “a method for PARALLEL FINE RASTERIZATION in a raster stage of a graphics pipeline” by Walt Steiner, et al., filed on Jun. 23, 2006, Ser. No. 11/474,027, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Generally, as described above, one of the major functions of the raster unit 502 is to identify which pixels are covered by given primitive and which pixels are not. In addition to determining which pixels are covered, an additional function of the raster unit 502 is to identify which pixels of a given tile are to be turned off regardless of coverage. This information is contained in a coverage mask, which generally comprises a data structure where each pixel is represented by a bit. For example, a 1024 pixel tile as described above would have a corresponding coverage mask of at least 1024 bits. The bits each indicate whether their corresponding pixels (or sample points) are on or off.
In one embodiment, the information regarding coverage by a graphics primitive and whether or not, regardless of coverage, a given pixel of a tile is on/off is compiled into a combined coverage mask that is generated in the window ID component 506. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the generation of this combined coverage mask is delayed until the various tests and evaluations that go into determining the on-off status of the pixels are performed.
Generation of the combined coverage mask is subsequent to coarse rasterization, a number of bounding box tests, depth culling, window ID, and stipple operations. Each of the above operations typically function by turning off pixels (e.g., “killing pixels”) which would otherwise be turned on due to their coverage by the graphics primitive. The concentration of a number of these pixel killing functions within the window ID unit 506 provides a number of advantages.
For example, by deferring the generation of the combined coverage mask until the window ID component 506, the raster unit 502 can implement a more efficient hardware algorithm. The raster unit 502 is not required to send as many coverage mask. bits down its pipeline from, for example, the coarse raster component 503, the Z cull component 505, and the like. In comparison to prior art, a typical prior art implementation would have to send at least 1024 bits (e.g., for a 32×32 tile) through all of these components to a window ID component. In contrast, in the
Referring now to process 700 of
In step 702, using the tile determined by the coarse raster component 503, a bounding box test is performed on the graphics primitive. In one embodiment, the bounding box test generates a bounding box rectangle that is superimposed on the graphics primitive. The bounding box rectangle incorporates a scissors rectangle test, a viewport rectangle test, and a screen rectangle test. All of these rectangles are combined to produce a bounding box mask, which is usually a rectangle, and which is used to turn off those bits that are outside the bounding box mask.
In step 703, a depth cull test is performed on the graphics primitive. The depth cull test is performed by a depth cull unit. As described above, the Z cull component 505 examines the tiles and culls the pixels comprising those portions of the graphics primitive that are covered by or are otherwise included in other graphics primitives. Such portions will ultimately not be displayed and should not be further processed. This information is transmitted to the window ID unit 506 for incorporation into the combined coverage mask.
In step 704, a window clipping test is performed on the graphics primitive. The window clipping tests generally comprise using a number of window rectangles that generate windows for applications on a display screen to turn off pixels that are outside of a given window or are covered by a given window. The window clipping test can be inclusive (e.g., pixels inside any of window rectangles are turned on) or exclusive (e.g., pixels inside any of the window rectangles are turned off).
In step 705, a polygon stipple operation is performed on the graphics primitive. The polygon stipple operation typically involves the use of a polygon stipple mask, where a user specified pattern is mapped onto the primitive being rendered. The pattern indicates which pixels should be turned off/on.
In step 706, a window ID test is performed on the graphics primitive. Window ID information is specified at the per pixel level. For each pixel of the combined coverage mask, a corresponding window ID number is associated therewith (e.g., 8 bit window ID, or the like). In one embodiment, the window ID function with regard to the use of the window ID number is in accordance with the OpenGL specification.
In step 707, the results of the operations from steps 702-706 are used to generate a combined coverage mask that reflects of the results of the above operations. Subsequently, in step 708, the tile is divided into a plurality of sub-portions and each of these the sub-portions are allocated to the fine raster component 504. In one embodiment, an array of fine raster components are used (e.g., array 604) and the resulting sub-portions are allocated among the fine raster components of the array for parallel fine rasterization.
In this manner, the deferral of the generation of the combined coverage mask and the concentration of a number of pixel killing functions into the window ID unit 506 provides a number of advantages. As described above, the raster unit 502 can implement a more efficient hardware algorithm by not sending as many coverage mask bits down its pipeline. Additionally, the window ID unit 506 can eliminate a number of sub-portions which are completely turned off prior to the point where individual sub-portions are allocated to the parallel fine raster components. Thus if an entire tile sub-portion is “killed” by the combination of pixel kill functions, it need not be allocated. This results in a further savings in the number of bits that need to be transmitted. Additionally, this saves the expense of replicating the window ID functionality in a number of different fine raster components. Performing the window ID functionality in a single component prior to dispatching multiple sub-portions to respective multiple fine raster components yields a much more efficient raster architecture.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4620217 | Songer | Oct 1986 | A |
4648045 | Demetrescu | Mar 1987 | A |
4667308 | Hayes et al. | May 1987 | A |
4700319 | Steiner | Oct 1987 | A |
4862392 | Steiner | Aug 1989 | A |
4901224 | Ewert | Feb 1990 | A |
5185856 | Alcorn et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5268995 | Diefendorff et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5270687 | Killebrew, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
5285323 | Hetherington et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5357604 | San et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5392393 | Deering | Feb 1995 | A |
5487022 | Simpson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488687 | Rich | Jan 1996 | A |
5491496 | Tomiyasu | Feb 1996 | A |
5557298 | Yang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577213 | Avery et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579473 | Schlapp et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579476 | Cheng et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581721 | Wada et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600584 | Schlafly | Feb 1997 | A |
5604824 | Chui et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613050 | Hochmuth et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5655132 | Watson | Aug 1997 | A |
5701444 | Baldwin | Dec 1997 | A |
5748202 | Nakatsuka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764228 | Baldwin | Jun 1998 | A |
5777628 | Buck-Gengler | Jul 1998 | A |
5808617 | Kenworthy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818456 | Cosman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831640 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844569 | Eisler et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850572 | Dierke | Dec 1998 | A |
5864342 | Kajiya et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5941940 | Prasad et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5977977 | Kajiya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995121 | Alcorn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002410 | Battle | Dec 1999 | A |
6118452 | Gannett | Sep 2000 | A |
6166743 | Tanaka | Dec 2000 | A |
6173366 | Thayer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6222550 | Rosman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229553 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259460 | Gossett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259461 | Brown | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288730 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313846 | Fenney et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333744 | Kirk et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351806 | Wyland | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353439 | Lindholm et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6407740 | Chan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411130 | Parikh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411301 | Parikh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417851 | Lindholm et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466222 | Kao et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496537 | Kranawetter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516032 | Heirich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525737 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526430 | Hung et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542971 | Reed | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557022 | Sih et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597363 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604188 | Coon et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624818 | Mantor et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636214 | Leather et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636221 | Morein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636223 | Morein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6664958 | Leather et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670955 | Morein | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693643 | Trivedi et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717577 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731288 | Parsons et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734861 | Van Dyke et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745390 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6778181 | Kilgariff et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6806886 | Zatz | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819331 | Shih et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839828 | Gschwind et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6879328 | Deering | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912695 | Ernst et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924808 | Kurihara et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947053 | Malka et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6980209 | Donham et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980222 | Marion et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999100 | Leather et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7034828 | Drebin et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042462 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7145566 | Karlov | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158141 | Chung et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187383 | Kent | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7257814 | Melvin et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7280112 | Hutchins | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7298375 | Hutchins | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7450120 | Hakura et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7477260 | Nordquist | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7659909 | Hutchins | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7710427 | Hutchins et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7928990 | Jiao et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941645 | Riach et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7969446 | Hutchins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020105519 | Lindholm et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126126 | Baldwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129223 | Takayama et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020169942 | Sugimoto | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030115233 | Hou et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030189565 | Lindholm et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040012597 | Zatz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012599 | Laws | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012600 | Deering et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024260 | Winkler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078504 | Law et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100474 | Demers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114813 | Boliek et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119710 | Piazza et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126035 | Kyo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040130552 | Duluk et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040246260 | Kim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050122330 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134588 | Aila et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135433 | Chang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162436 | Van Hook et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050223195 | Kawaguchi | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231506 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237337 | Leather et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050280655 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007234 | Hutchins et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028469 | Engel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060152519 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155964 | Totsuka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177122 | Yasue | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060288195 | Ma et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070279408 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285427 | Morein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1954338 | May 2004 | CN |
101091203 | May 2004 | CN |
1665165 | May 2004 | EP |
1745434 | May 2004 | EP |
1771824 | May 2004 | EP |
62080785 | Apr 1987 | JP |
05150979 | Jun 1993 | JP |
11053187 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000047872 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2002073330 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002171401 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2004199222 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2006196004 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008161169 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2005112592 | May 2004 | WO |
2006007127 | May 2004 | WO |
2005114582 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005114646 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action Dated Mar. 6, 2008: U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Sep. 26, 2008: U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Final Office Action Dated Apr. 22, 2009: U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Dec. 29, 2009: U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Final Office Action Dated Sep. 7, 2009: U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Apr. 22, 2011: U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 30, 2007: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Final Office Action Dated Nov. 6, 2007: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 16, 2008: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 12, 2009: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Final Office Action Dated Jun. 5, 2009: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 8, 2010: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Final Office Action Dated Sep. 7, 2010: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Apr. 26, 2011: U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Hutchins et al, Patent Application Entitled “A Unified Data Fetch Graphics Processing System and Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986, filed May 14, 2004. |
Processing System and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986, filed May 14, 2004. |
Hutchins et al, Patent Application Entitled “An Early Kill Removal Graphics Processing System and Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662, filed May 14, 2004. |
Processing System and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662, filed May 14, 2004. |
Pixar, Inc.; PhotoRealistic RenderMan 3.9 Shading Language Extensions, Sep. 1999. |
PCT Notificaiton of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration. PCT/US05/17032; Applicant NVIDA Corporation; Mail Date Nov. 9, 2005. |
PCT Notificaiton of Transmittal of The International Search Report or the Declaration. PCT/US05/17526; Applicant Hutchins, Edward A; Mail Date Jan. 17, 2006. |
PCT Notificaiton of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration. PCT/US05/17031; Applicant NVIDA Corporation; Mail Date Feb. 9, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 3, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Final Office Action Dated Jan. 31, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Oct. 19, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Final Office Action Dated Jul. 27, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 14, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Final Office Action Dated Sep. 22, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 1, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Final Office Action Dated Jan. 12, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
“Sideband” http://www.encylopedia.com/html/s1/sideband.asp. |
Final Office Action Dated Feb. 15, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Sep. 27, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Dec. 23, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Final Office Action Dated Aug. 11, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 3, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Final Office Action Dated Jan. 11, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jul. 17, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Final Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Aug. 21, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Final Office Action Dated Jun. 4, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Oct. 27, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Final Office Action Dated May 9, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Dec. 30, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 29, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Final Office Action Dated Nov. 26, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jun. 17, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 9, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Final Office Action Dated Sep. 22, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 9, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Final Office Action Dated Sep. 28, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 9, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 23, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Dec. 16, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Final Office Action Dated Jul. 26, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 20, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Final Office Action Dated Nov. 29, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 15, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 13, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Aug. 21, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jun. 11, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Final Office Action Dated Feb. 1, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 4, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 29, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Battle, J., Patent Application Entitled “Arbitrary Size Texture Palettes for Use in Graphics Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664, filed May 14, 2004. |
Hutchins et al, Patent Application Entitled “A Single Thread Graphics Processing System and Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192, filed May 14, 2004. |
Wolfe A, et al., “A Superscalar 3D graphics engine”, MICRO-32. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture. Haifa, Israel, Nov. 16-18, 1999; (1250EP). |
Zaharieva-Stoyanova E I: “Data-flow analysis in superscalar computer architecture execution,” Tellecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 2003 (1250EP). |
Non-Final OA Mailed on Aug. 3, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Final Office Action Mailed on Apr. 20, 2012; Appl. No. 1086208. |
Non-Final OA Mailed on Sep. 10, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,208. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Jul. 5, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Oct. 10, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,201. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Jan. 16, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Apr. 25, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Aug. 1, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Oct. 9, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,986. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Nov. 21, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Feb. 27, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Jun. 19, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,664. |
Final Office Action Mailed Dec. 30, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Aug. 28, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/845,662. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Dec. 1, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Mar. 15, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Jul. 12, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Oct. 22, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,192. |
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Mar. 16, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,732. |
Final Office Action Mailed Nov. 2, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,732. |
Non-Final Office Action Mailed May 10, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,732. |
Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 10, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,732. |
The Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia, definition for cache; http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cache; retrieved Aug. 17, 2012. |
“Interleaved Memory.” Dec. 26, 2002. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/interleaved—memory.html. |
Pirazzi, Chris. “Fields, F1/F2, Interleave, Field Dominance and More.” Nov. 4, 2001. http://lurkertech.com/lg/dominance.html. |
Hennessy, et al., Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Interface, 1997, Section 6.5. |
Moller, et al.; Real-Time Rendering, 2nd ed., 2002, A K Peteres Ltd., pp. 92-99, 2002. |
Hollasch; IEEE Standard 754 Floating Point Numbers; http://steve.hollasch.net/cgindex/coding/ieeefloat.html; dated Feb. 24, 2005; retrieved Oct. 21, 2010. |
Microsoft; (Complete) Tutorial to Understand IEEE Floating-Point Errors; http://support.microsoft.com/kb/42980; dated Aug. 16, 2005; retrieved Oct. 21, 2010. |
FOA Apr. 22, 2013. |
NOA Feb. 13, 2013. |
NOA Jan. 30, 2013. |
NOA Mar. 1, 2013. |
FOA Mar. 27, 2013. |
OA Apr. 22, 2013. |
OA Sep. 21, 2010. |
FOA Feb. 14, 2011. |
FOA Jun. 22, 2011. |
OA Mar. 27, 2012. |
FOA Jul. 18, 2012. |
Examiner's Answer Jan. 11, 2013. |