1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to fibre channel systems, and more particularly, to detecting congestion and oversubscription in fibre channel switches.
2. Background of the Invention
Fibre channel is a set of American National Standard Institute (ANSI) standards, which provide a serial transmission protocol for storage and network protocols such as HIPPI, SCSI, IP, ATM and others. Fibre channel provides an input/output interface to meet the requirements of both channel and network users.
Fibre channel supports three different topologies: point-to-point, arbitrated loop and fibre channel fabric. The point-to-point topology attaches two devices directly. The arbitrated loop topology attaches devices in a loop. The fibre channel fabric topology attaches host systems directly to a fabric, which are then connected to multiple devices. The fibre channel fabric topology allows several media types to be interconnected.
Fibre channel is a closed system that relies on multiple ports to exchange information on attributes and characteristics to determine if the ports can operate together. If the ports can work together, they define the criteria under which they communicate.
In fibre channel, a path is established between two nodes where the path's primary task is to transport data from one point to another at high speed with low latency, performing only simple error detection in hardware.
Fibre channel fabric devices include a node port or “N_Port” that manages fabric connections. The N_port establishes a connection to a fabric element (e.g., a switch) having a fabric port or F_port. Fabric elements include the intelligence to handle routing, error detection, recovery, and similar management functions.
A fibre channel switch is a multi-port device where each port manages a simple point-to-point connection between itself and its attached system. Each port can be attached to a server, peripheral, I/O (input/output) subsystem, bridge, hub, router, or even another switch. A switch receives messages from one port and automatically routes it to another port. Multiple calls or data transfers happen concurrently through the multi-port fibre channel switch.
Fibre channel switches use memory buffers to hold frames received and sent across a network. Associated with these buffers are credits, which are the number of frames a Fibre Channel port can transmit without overflowing the receive buffers at the other end of the link. Receiving an R_RDY primitive signal increases the credit, and sending a frame decreases the credit. The initial amount of credit is negotiated by two ends of the link during login. Credit counts can be implemented on a transmit port by starting at zero and counting up to the maximum, or by starting at the maximum and counting down to zero.
When using large networks, bottlenecks may occur that could reduce the performance of a network. Fibre Channel networks use flow control to make sure that for every transmitted frame there is a receive buffer at the other end of the link.
Congestion on a Fibre Channel network will prevent ports from transmitting frames while waiting for flow control signals (the R_RDY primitive signal in Fibre Channel).
In a Fabric with multiple switches, congestion may occur if more traffic is being routed through an E-port than it can handle. The use of frame counts or byte counts is not sufficient to detect congestion.
Often a fibre channel switch is coupled between devices that use varying data rates to transfer data. The mismatch in the data transfer rates can result in inefficient use of the overall bandwidth. An illustration of this problem is shown in
Host 203 can send data at 2 G to target 213 that can receive data at 1 G. Since target 213 receives data at a lower rate that can overfill the receive buffers in switch 209 resulting in congestion.
As data rates increase (for example, from 1 G to 10 G), Fibre Channel networks will need efficient congestion and over subscription detection techniques. Therefore, what is required is a process and system that efficiently detects congestion and over subscription.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method for detecting congestion in a transmit side of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The method includes, updating a counter if a frame cannot be transmitted from a transmit side of a switch due to lack of credit; comparing the counter value to a threshold value; and triggering a threshold event if the counter value varies from the threshold value.
In another aspect, a method for detecting congestion on a receive segment of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The method includes, comparing a counter value to a threshold value, if a receive buffer is full; and triggering a threshold event if the counter value varies from the threshold value.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for detecting congestion in a transmit segment of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The method includes, determining if credit is available for transmitting a frame; triggering an event based on a duration that the frame waits for transmission; and notifying a processor based on such event. A first counter value is compared to a threshold value to trigger the event.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for detecting congestion at a receive segment of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The method includes, determining if a receive buffer has been full for a certain duration; and triggering an event if the duration varies from a threshold value.
In yet another aspect, a system for detecting congestion in a fibre channel switch element is provided. The system includes, a first counter that counts a duration for which a frame waits for transmission, and the duration is compared to a threshold value to detect congestion. The threshold value may be programmed by firmware used by the fibre channel switch element and if the first counter value is greater than the threshold value, an event is triggered.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a system for detecting congestion at a receive segment of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The system includes, a receive buffer log that indicates how quickly frames are moving through the receive segment. The system also includes, a first counter that is incremented when a receive buffer is full and if the counter value varies from a threshold value, an event is generated; and a register that maintains count for frames that are routed to another switch element.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a system for determining over-subscription in a transmit segment of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The system includes a first register that maintains information regarding a rate at which a source port can transfer data; a first counter that counts entries corresponding to a number of frames to be transmitted at a given time; and a second register that determines an over-subscription rate.
In yet another aspect of the present, a method for determining over-subscription in a transmit port of a fibre channel switch element is provided. The method includes, determining an over-subscription value based on a source port's data rate, a transmit port's data rate and an entry corresponding to a number of frames that are to be transmitted from the transmit port at a given time; and notifying a processor of the over-subscription rate if the over-subscription value is different from a threshold value.
This brief summary has been provided so that the nature of the invention may be understood quickly. A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof concerning the attached drawings.
The foregoing features and other features of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings of a preferred embodiment. In the drawings, the same components have the same reference numerals. The illustrated embodiment is intended to illustrate, but not to limit the invention. The drawings include the following Figures:
FIGS. 1E-1/1E-2 (jointly referred to as
FIGS. 3A/3B (jointly referred to as
FIGS. 4A/4B (jointly referred to as
Definitions:
The following definitions are provided as they are typically (but not exclusively) used in the fibre channel environment, implementing the various adaptive aspects of the present invention.
“E-Port”: A fabric expansion port that attaches to another Interconnect port to create an Inter-Switch Link.
“F_Port”: A port to which non-loop N_Ports are attached to a fabric and does not include FL_ports.
“Fibre channel ANSI Standard”: The standard (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) describes the physical interface, transmission and signaling protocol of a high performance serial link for support of other high level protocols associated with IPI, SCSI, IP, ATM and others.
“FC-1”: Fibre channel transmission protocol, which includes serial encoding, decoding and error control.
“FC-2”: Fibre channel signaling protocol that includes frame structure and byte sequences.
“FC-3”: Defines a set of fibre channel services that are common across plural ports of a node.
“FC-4”: Provides mapping between lower levels of fibre channel, IPI and SCSI command sets, HIPPI data framing, IP and other upper level protocols.
“Fabric”: A system which interconnects various ports attached to it and is capable of routing fibre channel frames by using destination identifiers provided in FC-2 frame headers.
“Fabric Topology”: This is a topology where a device is directly attached to a fibre channel fabric that uses destination identifiers embedded in frame headers to route frames through a fibre channel fabric to a desired destination.
“FL_Port”: A L_Port that is able to perform the function of a F_Port, attached via a link to one or more NL_Ports in an Arbitrated Loop topology.
“Inter-Switch Link”: A Link directly connecting the E_port of one switch to the E_port of another switch.
“Port”: A general reference to N. Sub.--Port or F.Sub.--Port.
“L_Port”: A port that contains Arbitrated Loop functions associated with the Arbitrated Loop topology.
“N_Port”: A direct fabric attached port.
“NL_Port”: A L_Port that can perform the function of a N_Port.
“Over subscription”: is defined herein as data arriving at a Fibre Channel transmit port faster than the port can transmit it. It is noteworthy that the over subscribed transmit port itself may not be congested and may be sending at its full data rate. But an over subscribed transmit port will cause congestion at the ports that are sending frames routed to the oversubscribed port.
“Switch”: A fabric element conforming to the Fibre Channel Switch standards.
“VL”: Virtual Lane: A portion of the data path between a source and destination port.
Fibre Channel System:
To facilitate an understanding of the preferred embodiment, the general architecture and operation of a fibre channel system will be described. The specific architecture and operation of the preferred embodiment will then be described with reference to the general architecture of the fibre channel system.
The devices of
The fabric element of the present invention is presently implemented as a single CMOS ASIC, and for this reason the term “fabric element” and ASIC are used interchangeably to refer to the preferred embodiments in this specification. Although
ASIC 20 has 20 ports numbered in
For illustration purposes only, all GL ports are drawn on the same side of ASIC 20 in
Each port GL0-GL19 has transmit and receive connections to switch crossbar 50. One connection is through receive buffer 52, which functions to receive and temporarily hold a frame during a routing operation. The other connection is through a transmit buffer 54.
Switch crossbar 50 includes a number of switch crossbars for handling specific types of data and data flow control information. For illustration purposes only, switch crossbar 50 is shown as a single crossbar. Switch crossbar 50 is a connectionless crossbar (packet switch) of known conventional design, sized to connect 21×21 paths. This is to accommodate 20 GL ports plus a port for connection to a fabric controller, which may be external to ASIC 20.
In the preferred embodiments of switch chassis described herein, the fabric controller is a firmware-programmed microprocessor, also referred to as the input/out processor (“IOP”). IOP 66 is shown in
Control register 62 receives and holds control information from IOP 66, so that IOP 66 can change characteristics or operating configuration of ASIC 20 by placing certain control words in register 62. IOP 66 can read status of ASIC 20 by monitoring various codes that are placed in status register 64 by monitoring circuits (not shown).
Each GL port has an optical-electric converter, designated as OE0-OE19 connected with its SERDES through serial lines, for providing fibre optic input/output connections, as is well known in the high performance switch design. The converters connect to switch channels C0-C19. It is noteworthy that the ports can connect through copper paths or other means instead of optical-electric converters.
FIG. 1E-1/1E-2 (jointly referred to as
Control port module 62A includes control buffers 62B and 62D for transmit and receive sides, respectively. Module 62A also includes a PCI interface module 62C that allows interface with IOP 66 via a PCI bus 66A.
XG_Port (for example 74B) includes RPORT 72 with RBUF 71 similar to RPORT 69 and RBUF 69A and a TBUF and TPORT similar to TBUF 70A and TPORT 70. Protocol module 73 interfaces with SERDES to handle protocol based functionality.
GL Port:
Receive Segment of GL Port:
Frames enter through link 301 and SERDES 302 converts data into 10-bit parallel data to fibre channel characters, which are then sent to receive pipe (“Rpipe” or “Rpipe1” or “Rpipe2”) 303A via a de-multiplexer (DEMUX) 303. Rpipe 303A includes, parity module 305 and decoder 304. Decoder 304 decodes 10B data to 8B and parity module 305 adds a parity bit. Rpipe 303A also performs various Fibre Channel standard functions such as detecting a start of frame (SOF), end-of frame (EOF), Idles, R_RDYs (fibre channel standard primitive) and the like, which are not described since they are standard functions.
Rpipe 303A connects to smoothing FIFO (SMF) module 306 that performs smoothing functions to accommodate clock frequency variations between remote transmitting and local receiving devices.
Frames received by RPORT 310 are stored in receive buffer (RBUF) 69A, (except for certain Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (AL) frames). Path 309 shows the frame entry path, and all frames entering path 309 are written to RBUF 69A as opposed to the AL path 308.
Cyclic redundancy code (CRC) module 313 further processes frames that enter GL port 300 by checking CRC and processing errors according to FC_PH rules. The frames are subsequently passed to RBUF 69A where they are steered to an appropriate output link. RBUF 69A is a link receive buffer and can hold multiple frames.
Reading from and writing to RBUF 69A are controlled by RBUF read control logic (“RRD”) 319 and RBUF write control logic (“RWT”) 307, respectively. RWT 307 specifies which empty RBUF 69A slot will be written into when a frame arrives through the data link via multiplexer 313B, CRC generate module 313A and EF (external proprietary format) module 314. EF module 314 encodes proprietary (i.e. non-standard) format frames to standard Fibre Channel 8B codes. Mux 313B receives input from Rx Spoof module 314A, which encodes frames to a proprietary format (if enabled). RWT 307 controls RBUF 69A write addresses and provide the slot number to tag writer (“TWT”) 317.
RRD 319 processes frame transfer requests from RBUF 69A. Frames may be read out in any order and multiple destinations may get copies of the frames.
Steering state machine (SSM) 316 receives frames and determines the destination for forwarding the frame. SSM 316 produces a destination mask, where there is one bit for each destination. Any bit set to a certain value, for example, 1, specifies a legal destination, and there can be multiple bits set, if there are multiple destinations for the same frame (multicast or broadcast).
SSM 316 makes this determination using information from alias cache 315, steering registers 316A, control register 326 values and frame contents. IOP 66 writes all tables so that correct exit path is selected for the intended destination port addresses.
The destination mask from SSM 316 is sent to TWT 317 and a RBUF tag register (RTAG) 318. TWT 317 writes tags to all destinations specified in the destination mask from SSM 316. Each tag identifies its corresponding frame by containing an RBUF 69A slot number where the frame resides, and an indication that the tag is valid.
Each slot in RBUF 69A has an associated set of tags, which are used to control the availability of the slot. The primary tags are a copy of the destination mask generated by SSM 316. As each destination receives a copy of the frame, the destination mask in RTAG 318 is cleared. When all the mask bits are cleared, it indicates that all destinations have received a copy of the frame and that the corresponding frame slot in RBUF 69A is empty and available for a new frame.
RTAG 318 also has frame content information that is passed to a requesting destination to pre-condition the destination for the frame transfer. These tags are transferred to the destination via a read multiplexer (RMUX) (not shown).
Transmit Segment of GL Port:
Transmit segment (“TPORT”) 312 performs various transmit functions. Transmit tag register (TTAG) 330 provides a list of all frames that are to be transmitted. Tag Writer 317 or common segment 311 write TTAG 330 information. The frames are provided to arbitration module (“transmit arbiter” (“TARB”)) 331, which is then free to choose which source to process and which frame from that source to be processed next.
TTAG 330 includes a collection of buffers (for example, buffers based on a first-in first out (“FIFO”) scheme) for each frame source. TTAG 330 writes a tag for a source and TARB 331 then reads the tag. For any given source, there are as many entries in TTAG 330 as there are credits in RBUF 69A.
TARB 331 is activated anytime there are one or more valid frame tags in TTAG 330. TARB 331 preconditions its controls for a frame and then waits for the frame to be written into TBUF 70A. After the transfer is complete, TARB 331 may request another frame from the same source or choose to service another source.
TBUF 70A is the path to the link transmitter. Typically, frames don't land in TBUF 70A in their entirety. Mostly, frames simply pass through TBUF 70A to reach output pins, if there is a clear path.
Switch Mux 332 is also provided to receive output from crossbar 50. Switch Mux 332 receives input from plural RBUFs (shown as RBUF 00 to RBUF 19), and input from CPORT 62A shown as CBUF 1 frame/status. TARB 331 determines the frame source that is selected and the selected source provides the appropriate slot number. The output from Switch Mux 332 is sent to ALUT 323 for S_ID spoofing and the result is fed into TBUF Tags 333.
TMUX (“TxMux”) 339 chooses which data path to connect to the transmitter. The sources are: primitive sequences specified by IOP 66 via control registers 326 (shown as primitive 339A), and signals as specified by Transmit state machine (“TSM”) 346, frames following the loop path, or steered frames exiting the fabric via TBUF 70A.
TSM 346 chooses the data to be sent to the link transmitter, and enforces all fibre Channel rules for transmission. TSM 346 receives requests to transmit from loop state machine 320, TBUF 70A (shown as TARB request 346A) and from various other IOP 66 functions via control registers 326 (shown as IBUF Request 345A). TSM 346 also handles all credit management functions, so that Fibre Channel connectionless frames are transmitted only when there is link credit to do so.
Loop state machine (“LPSM”) 320 controls transmit and receive functions when GL_Port is in a loop mode. LPSM 320 operates to support loop functions as specified by FC-AL-2.
IOP buffer (“IBUF”) 345 provides IOP 66 the means for transmitting frames for special purposes.
Frame multiplexor (“Frame Mux” or “Mux”) 336 chooses the frame source, while logic (TX spoof 334) converts D_ID and S_ID from public to private addresses. Frame Mux 336 receives input from Tx Spoof module 334, TBUF tags 333, and Mux 335 to select a frame source for transmission.
EF module 338 encodes proprietary (i.e. non-standard) format frames to standard Fibre Channel 8B codes and CRC module 337 generates CRC data for the outgoing frames.
Modules 340-343 put a selected transmission source into proper format for transmission on an output link 344. Parity 340 checks for parity errors, when frames are encoded from 8B to 10B by encoder 341, marking frames “invalid”, according to Fibre Channel rules, if there was a parity error. Phase FIFO 342A receives frames from encode module 341 and the frame is selected by Mux 342 and passed to SERDES 343. SERDES 343 converts parallel transmission data to serial before passing the data to the link media. SERDES 343 may be internal or external to ASIC 20.
Common Segment of GL Port:
As discussed above, ASIC 20 include common segment 311 comprising of various modules. LPSM 320 has been described above and controls the general behavior of TPORT 312 and RPORT 310.
A loop look up table (“LLUT”) 322 and an address look up table (“ALUT”) 323 is used for private loop proxy addressing and hard zoning managed by firmware.
Common segment 311 also includes control register 326 that controls bits associated with a GL_Port, status register 324 that contains status bits that can be used to trigger interrupts, and interrupt mask register 325 that contains masks to determine the status bits that will generate an interrupt to IOP 66. Common segment 311 also includes AL control and status register 328 and statistics register 327 that provide accounting information for FC management information base (“MIB”).
Output from status register 324 may be used to generate a Fp Peek function. This allows a status register 324 bit to be viewed and sent to the CPORT.
Output from control register 326, statistics register 327 and register 328 (as well as 328A for an X_Port, shown in
Output from Interrupt register 325 and status register 324 is sent to logic 335 to generate a port interrupt signal (FP Port Interrupt).
BIST module 321 is used for conducting embedded memory testing.
XG Port
RPORT 310A can receive frames from links (or lanes) 301A-301D and transmit frames to lanes 344A-344D. Each link has a SERDES (302A-302D), a de-skew module, a decode module (303B-303E) and parity module (304A-304D). Each lane also has a smoothing FIFO (SMF) module 305A-305D that performs smoothing functions to accommodate clock frequency variations. Parity errors are checked by module 403, while CRC errors are checked by module 404.
RPORT 310A uses a virtual lane (“VL”) cache 402 that stores plural vector values that are used for virtual lane assignment. In one aspect of the present invention, VL Cache 402 may have 32 entries and two vectors per entry. IOP 66 is able to read or write VL cache 402 entries during frame traffic. State machine 401 controls credit that is received. On the transmit side, credit state machine 347 controls frame transmission based on credit availability. State machine 347 interfaces with credit counters 328A.
Also on the transmit side, modules 340-343 are used for each lane 344A-344D, i.e., each lane can have its own module 340-343. Parity module 340 checks for parity errors and encode module 341 encodes 8-bit data to 10 bit data. Mux 342B sends the 10-bit data to a smoothing (“TxSMF”) module 342 that handles clock variation on the transmit side. SERDES 343 then sends the data out to the link.
Congestion Detection:
In one aspect of the present invention, the following set of counters and status registers can be used to detect congestion, both at the transmit and receive side.
TPORT Congestion:
The following describes various registers/counters that are used to detect congestion at TPORT 312A:
“Transmit Wait Count Register”: This register increments each time a frame is available for transmission but cannot be transmitted due to lack of credit. This time interval may be the time needed to transmit, for example, one word (32 bits).
“Transmit Wait Count Rollover Event”: This status event is set when the transmit wait count register rolls over from its maximum value to zero. This can be set to cause an interrupt to IOP 66.
“Transmit wait Count Threshold Register”(
“Transmit Wait Count Threshold Counter”(
“Transmit Wait Count Threshold Event Status”: This event occurs when the transmit wait count threshold counter value exceeds a threshold value programmed in the transmit wait count threshold register (508). This denotes that frames have been waiting to transmit based on a threshold value. The event can be used to trigger an interrupt to IOP 66.
“Congestion count adjustment” (
Register 508 includes a threshold value that can be programmed by IOP 66 using the firmware (or hard coded). Register 508 output 512 and counter 507 output 511 is compared (by logic 509), and if the counter value (511) is greater than the threshold value (512) then the threshold wait count event is set, which results in an interrupt to IOP 66 (510).
To extend the range of values that can be compared without having to increase the number of bits for threshold count in module 508, compare module 509, and counter 507 include more bits than the threshold count. Then counter output 511 is shifted down by a programmable number of bits. For instance, if counter 507 is 2 bits longer than threshold count 508, then shifting counter output 511 is shifted down 1 or 2 bits, divides the counter output by 2 or 4, making the range available for the threshold count larger by a factor of 2 or 4, but losing precision in the lowest 1 or 2 bits of the counter.
The output of module 1003 is “ANDED” with the original signal by 1004 to provide the “adjusted count up” or “count down” output. The adjusted count rolls over when incremented past its maximum (depending on number of bits in count). The result is to change the rate of count up or count down, depending on the adjusted level value and the number of bits in the counter. If there are n bits in the counter, the rate of count signals is modified as follows:
C=r*(1−(a/2**n))
Where C is the effective count rate (rate of signals in
In step S600, frames (or signal to transmit frames) are received for transmission. In step S601, the process determines if credit is available to transmit the frame. If credit is available, then in step S603, the frame is sent and counter 507 is decremented or cleared.
If no credit is available, then in step S602, counter 507 is incremented.
In step S604, the process compares counter 507 value 511 to a threshold value 512 that can be programmed by firmware in register 508. If the counter value 511 is greater than threshold value 512, then in step S605, a wait count event is triggered. This can be an interrupt to IOP 66 and denotes congestion.
If counter value 511 is less than threshold value 512, then the process goes back to step S601.
RPORT Congestion:
The following describes various registers/counters that are used to detect congestion at RPORT 310A:
“Receive Buffer Full Status”: This status is set when all buffers (RBUF 69A) for a port are full.
If the credit mechanism per Fibre Channel standards is operative then TPORT 312A cannot transmit because of lack of credit. This status can be programmed by firmware to cause an interrupt for IOP 66.
“Receive Buffer Full Threshold Register” (
“Receive Buffer Full Threshold Counter” (
“Receive Buffer Full Threshold Event Status” (709): This event happens if the receive buffer full threshold counter value exceeds the programmed (or hard coded) receive buffer full threshold register value. This occurs if received frames cannot be moved to their destination for a certain period. This event can be used to generate an interrupt for IOP 66.
“Receive Buffer Log”: A buffer log can be kept in RBUF 69A. The log includes the upper 16 bits of the source and destination addresses (S_ID and D_ID) of the frames that are received in RBUF 69A, and the status indicating if data is valid. If the frames are forwarded rapidly, the log values will change quickly. However, due to congestion, if frames do not move quickly, then these values do not change rapidly. Sampling the log values provides a statistical sample of frame sources and destinations at a port. The log allows identifying the destination(s) that are congested. The log can be sent upstream to a device so that the upstream device can alter routing based on congestion.
“E-Port Frame In Count Register”: This register located in CPORT 311A, counts received frames that are routed to an E_Port to go to another switch. By comparing this register count to the overall received frame count at a port; the percentage of frames going to another switches, versus local destinations can be determined.
Register 706 can be programmed with a threshold value by firmware. Counter 705 generates a value 710 that is compared with register 706 threshold value 711. If counter value 710 is greater than threshold value 711, then a “receive buffer full” event is triggered (709). This can be used to generate an interrupt for IOP 66.
If the buffer is full, then in step S803, counter 705 is incremented.
In step S804, counter 705 value 710 is compared with threshold value 711. If the counter value 710 is greater than threshold value 711, then a threshold event is set in step S805, otherwise, the process goes back to step S801.
Based on the foregoing adaptive aspects of the present invention, one possible improvement would be to route traffic from A to C over link 3 or to add another link between switches B and C. These improvements are possible because the various counters and registers above can detect congestion in the links.
Over Subscription Detection:
The following describes various registers/counters that are used to detect over subscription at TPORT 312A. In one aspect, the register/counters are implemented in TTAG 330:
“Port Rate” register: This register includes the receive speed of the source port associated with that TTAG FIFO.
“Port TTAG Entry Count” counter: This counter provides the number of TTAG FIFO entries representing frames to be transmitted, currently in the TTAG FIFO for a source port.
“Calculate Over Subscription” Register: This register calculates the amount of over subscription by multiplying the port TTAG entry count by the source port rate, adding the result for all ports, then dividing the total by the transmit port's speed rate. If there are n source ports, and if Rx is the rate of source port x, Fx is the number of frames in the TTAG FIFO, and T is the transmit rate for the transmit port, then over subscription is provided by:
((R0*F0)+(R1*F1)+ . . . (R(n−1)*F(n−1)))/T
“Threshold” Value: This value is programmed by firmware and is compared to the calculated over subscription value. If the calculated over subscription value is greater than or equal to the threshold value, then the over subscription status is set. The status is used by firmware and may cause an interrupt for IOP 66.
If integer arithmetic is used, any result of the over subscription calculation between 1 and 2 may be rounded down to 1. To increase precision, the sum of the products of the port TTAG counts and rates can be shifted up by 2 or 3 bits (multiplying by 4 or 8) before the division by the transmit rate. Over subscription is determined by:
(((R0*F0)+(R1*F1)+ . . . (R(n−1)*F(n−1))*4)/T
The value selected from module 1104 takes the foregoing into account.
The raw values i.e., (R0*F0) . . . (R(n−1)*F(n−1)) are available to IOP 66 as status and used in the determination of which ports have how much over subscription.
It is noteworthy that the term “signal” as used in the foregoing description includes firmware/software commands.
In one aspect of the present invention, congestion can be detected in fibre channel switches and routing changes can be made to improve the overall performance of the networks.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, these embodiments are illustrative only and not limiting. Many other applications and embodiments of the present invention will be apparent in light of this disclosure and the following claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C.§ 119(e)(1) to the following provisional patent applications: Filed on Sep. 19, 2003, Ser. No. 60/503,812, entitled “Method and System for Fibre Channel Switches”; Filed on Jan. 21, 2004, Ser. No. 60/537,933 entitled “Method And System For Routing And Filtering Network Data Packets In Fibre Channel Systems”; Filed on Jul. 21, 2003, Ser. No. 60/488,757, entitled “Method and System for Selecting Virtual Lanes in Fibre Channel Switches”; Filed on Dec. 29, 2003, Ser. No. 60/532,965, entitled “Programmable Pseudo Virtual Lanes for Fibre Channel Systems”; Filed on Sep. 19, 2003, Ser. No. 60/504,038, entitled “Method and System for Reducing Latency and Congestion in Fibre Channel Switches”; Filed on Aug. 14, 2003, Ser. No. 60/495,212, entitled “Method and System for Detecting Congestion and Over Subscription in a Fibre channel Network” Filed on Aug. 14, 2003, Ser. No. 60/495,165, entitled “LUN Based Hard Zoning in Fibre Channel Switches”; Filed on Sep. 19, 2003, Ser. No. 60/503,809, entitled “Multi Speed Cut Through Operation in Fibre Channel Switches” Filed on Sep. 23, 2003, Ser. No. 60/505,381, entitled “Method and System for Improving bandwidth and reducing Idles in Fibre Channel Switches”; Filed on Sep. 23, 2003, Ser. No. 60/505,195, entitled “Method and System for Keeping a Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop Open During Frame Gaps”; Filed on Mar. 30, 2004, Ser. No. 60/557,613, entitled “Method and System for Congestion Control based on Optimum Bandwidth Allocation in a Fibre Channel Switch”; Filed on Sep. 23, 2003, Ser. No. 60/505,075, entitled “Method and System for Programmable Data Dependent Network Routing”; Filed on Sep. 19, 2003, Ser. No. 60/504,950, entitled “Method and System for Power Control of Fibre Channel Switches”; Filed on Dec. 29, 2003, Ser. No. 60/532,967, entitled “Method and System for Buffer to Buffer Credit recovery in Fibre Channel Systems Using Virtual and/or Pseudo Virtual Lane” Filed on Dec. 29, 2003, Ser. No. 60/532,966, entitled “Method And System For Using Extended Fabric Features With Fibre Channel Switch Elements” Filed on Mar. 4, 2004, Ser. No. 60/550,250, entitled “Method And System for Programmable Data Dependent Network Routing” Filed on May 7, 2004, Ser. No. 60/569,436, entitled “Method And System For Congestion Control In A Fibre Channel Switch” Filed on May 18, 2004, Ser. No. 60/572,197, entitled “Method and System for Configuring Fibre Channel Ports” and Filed on Dec. 29, 2003, Ser. No. 60/532,963 entitled “Method and System for Managing Traffic in Fibre Channel Switches”. The disclosure of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4081612 | Hafner | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4162375 | Schilichte | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4200929 | Davidjuk et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4258418 | Heath | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4344132 | Dixon et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4382159 | Bowditch | May 1983 | A |
| 4425640 | Philip et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4546468 | Christmas et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4569043 | Simmons et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4691296 | Struger | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4716561 | Angell et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4725835 | Schreiner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4821034 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4860193 | Bentley et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4964119 | Endo et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4980857 | Walter et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5025370 | Koegel et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5051742 | Hullett et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5090011 | Fukuta et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5115430 | Hahne et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5144622 | Takiyasu et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5258751 | DeLuca et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5260933 | Rouse | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5260935 | Turner | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5280483 | Kamoi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5291481 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5339311 | Turner | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5367520 | Cordell | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5390173 | Spinney et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5425022 | Clark et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5537400 | Diaz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5568165 | Kimura | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568167 | Galbi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5579443 | Tatematsu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5590125 | Acampora et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594672 | Hicks | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598541 | Malladi | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5610745 | Bennett | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623492 | Teraslinna | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5666483 | McClary | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677909 | Heide | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687172 | Cloonan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5701416 | Thorson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706279 | Teraslinna | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5732206 | Mendel | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5748612 | Stoevhase et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757771 | Li et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764927 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768271 | Seid et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768533 | Ran | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5784358 | Smith et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790545 | Holt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790840 | Bulka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5812525 | Teraslinna | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5818842 | Burwell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5821875 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822300 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825748 | Barkey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828475 | Bennett et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835752 | Chiang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5850386 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5892604 | Yamanaka et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894560 | Carmichael et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5925119 | Maroney | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5936442 | Liu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954796 | McCarty et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5974547 | Klimenko | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978359 | Caldara et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978379 | Chan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987028 | Yang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999528 | Chow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009226 | Tsuji et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011779 | Wills | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014383 | McCarty | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021128 | Hosoya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026092 | Abu-Amara et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031842 | Trevitt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6046979 | Bauman | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047323 | Krause | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055618 | Thorson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6061360 | Miller et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6081512 | Muller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6108738 | Chambers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108778 | LaBerge | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118776 | Berman | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6118791 | Fichou et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128292 | Kim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6134127 | Kirchberg | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144668 | Bass et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6147976 | Shand et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151644 | Wu | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158014 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160813 | Banks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6185203 | Berman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201787 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209089 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6229822 | Chow et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6230276 | Hayden | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240096 | Book | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6252891 | Perches | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253267 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6278708 | Von Hammerstein et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6286011 | Velamuri et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289002 | Henson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6301612 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307857 | Yokoyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308220 | Mathur | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311204 | Mills et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6324181 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6330236 | Ofek et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6333932 | Kobayasi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335935 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
| 6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6353612 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370605 | Chong | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6397360 | Bruns | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6401128 | Stai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6404749 | Falk | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411599 | Blanc et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411627 | Hullett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6418477 | Verma | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421342 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421711 | Blumenau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6424658 | Mathur | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6438628 | Messerly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449274 | Holden et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457090 | Young | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6467008 | Gentry, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470026 | Pearson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6509988 | Saito | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6522656 | Gridley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6532212 | Soloway et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6563796 | Saito | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570850 | Gutierrez et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570853 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6594231 | Byham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597691 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597777 | Ho | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606690 | Padovano | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6614796 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622206 | Kanamaru et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629161 | Matsuki et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6643298 | Brunheroto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6657962 | Barri et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6684209 | Ito et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6697359 | George | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697368 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697914 | Hospodor et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6718497 | Whitby-Strevens | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6738381 | Agnevik et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6744772 | Eneboe et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760302 | Ellinas et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6779083 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6807181 | Weschler | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6816492 | Turner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6816750 | Klaas | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6859435 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6865157 | Scott et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6886141 | Kunz et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6888831 | Hospodor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6901072 | Wong | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6904507 | Gil | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6922408 | Bloch et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6928470 | Hamlin | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934799 | Acharya et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6941357 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6941482 | Strong | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947393 | Hooper, III | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952659 | King et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6968463 | Pherson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6975627 | Parry et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6987768 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6988130 | Blumenau et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6988149 | Odenwald | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7000025 | Wilson | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7002926 | Eneboe et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7010607 | Bunton | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7024410 | Ito et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7031615 | Genrile | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7039070 | Kawakatsu | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7039870 | Takaoka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047326 | Crosbie et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7050392 | Valdevit | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051182 | Blumenau et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055068 | Riedl | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7061862 | Horiguchi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061871 | Sheldon et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076569 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7092374 | Gubbi | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7110394 | Chamdani et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7120728 | Krakirian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123306 | Goto et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124169 | Shimozono et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7150021 | Vajjhala et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7151778 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7171050 | Kim | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7185062 | Lolayekar et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7221650 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7187688 | Garmire et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7188364 | Volpano | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7190667 | Susnow et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194538 | Rabe et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7200108 | Beer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7200610 | Prawdiuk et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7209478 | Rojas et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7215680 | Mullendore et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7230929 | Betker et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7233985 | Hahn et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7245613 | Winkles et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7248580 | George et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 6785241 | Lu et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263593 | Honda et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266286 | Tanizawa et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7269168 | Roy et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7277431 | Walter et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7287063 | Baldwin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7269131 | Cashman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7292593 | Winkles et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7315511 | Morita et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327680 | Kloth | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7346707 | Erimli | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7352740 | Hammons et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7397788 | Mies et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7406034 | Cometto et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 20010011357 | Mori | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010022823 | Renaud | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010033552 | Barrack et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010038628 | Ofek et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043564 | Bloch et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047460 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020016838 | Geluc et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034178 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071387 | Horiguchi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103913 | Tawil et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104039 | DeRolf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118692 | Oberman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122428 | Fan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124124 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147560 | Devins et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147843 | Rao | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156918 | Valdevit et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159385 | Susnow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172195 | Pekkala et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174197 | Schimke et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020191602 | Woodring et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194294 | Blumenau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196773 | Berman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002503 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030002516 | Boock et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030016683 | George et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030021239 | Mullendore et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026267 | Oberman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026287 | Mullendore et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033487 | Pfister et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030035433 | Craddock et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046396 | Richter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030056000 | Mullendore et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030063567 | Dehart | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072316 | Niu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076788 | Grabauskas et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079019 | Lolayekar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084219 | Yao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030086377 | Berman | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091062 | Lay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093607 | Main et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103451 | Lutgen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112819 | Kofoed et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115355 | Cometto et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117961 | Chuah et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030118053 | Edsall et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120743 | Coatney et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120791 | Weber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120983 | Vieregge et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126223 | Jenne et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126242 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131105 | Czeiger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137941 | Kaushik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139900 | Robison | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172149 | Edsall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172239 | Swank | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174652 | Ebata | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174721 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174789 | Waschura et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179709 | Huff | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179748 | George et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179755 | Fraser | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189930 | Terrell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189935 | Warden et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191857 | Terell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195983 | Krause | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030198238 | Westby | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030218986 | DeSanti et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229808 | Heintz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236953 | Grieff et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013088 | Gregg | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013092 | Betker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013113 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013125 | Betker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015638 | Bryn | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024831 | Yang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040028038 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054776 | Klotz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054866 | Blumenau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040057389 | Klotz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064664 | Gil | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081186 | Warren et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081196 | Elliott | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081394 | Biren et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085955 | Walter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085974 | Mies et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085994 | Warren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092278 | Diepstraten et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100944 | Richmond et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109418 | Fedorkow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123181 | Moon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141518 | Milligan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141521 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151188 | Maveli et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153526 | Haun et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153914 | El-Batal | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174813 | Kasper et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202189 | Arndt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208201 | Otake | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267982 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050023656 | Leedy | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036499 | Dutt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036763 | Kato et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047334 | Paul et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073956 | Moores et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076113 | Klotz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088969 | Carlsen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108444 | Flauaus et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111845 | Nelson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117522 | Basavaiah et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177641 | Yamagami | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198523 | Shanbhag et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060013248 | Mujeeb et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034192 | Hurley et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034302 | Peterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047852 | Shah et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074927 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060107260 | Motta | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143300 | See et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184711 | Pettey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203725 | Paul et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274744 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070206502 | Martin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0649098 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0856969 | Jan 1998 | EP |
| WO-9836537 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO-0195566 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO03088050 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050030893 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60503812 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60537933 | Jan 2004 | US | |
| 60488757 | Jul 2003 | US | |
| 60532965 | Dec 2003 | US | |
| 60504038 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60495212 | Aug 2003 | US | |
| 60495165 | Aug 2003 | US | |
| 60503809 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60505381 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60505195 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60557613 | Mar 2004 | US | |
| 60505075 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60504950 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60532967 | Dec 2003 | US | |
| 60532966 | Dec 2003 | US | |
| 60550250 | Mar 2004 | US | |
| 60569436 | May 2004 | US | |
| 60572197 | May 2004 | US | |
| 60532963 | Dec 2003 | US |