Patent Grant
7613661
The present invention relates to mail processing systems and the printing of postal indicia, and in particular to a method and system for preventing fraud by detecting possible duplicate printing of postal indicia based upon the number of pixels used in printing postal indicia.
Mail processing systems, such as, for example, a mailing machine, often include different modules that automate the processes of producing mail pieces. The typical mailing machine includes a variety of different modules or sub-systems, each of which performs a different task on the mail piece. The mail piece is conveyed downstream utilizing a transport mechanism, such as rollers or a belt, to each of the modules. Such modules could include, for example, a singulating module for separating a stack of mail pieces such that the mail pieces are conveyed one at a time along the transport path, a stripping/moistening module for stripping open the flap of an envelope and wetting and sealing the glued flap of an envelope, a weighing module for weighing the mail piece, and a metering/printing module for storing postage amounts and applying evidence of postage either directly to the mail piece or to a tape to be applied to the mail piece. The mailing machine is controlled by a central processing unit that executes software stored in memory provided in the mailing machine. The exact configuration of the mailing machine is, of course, particular to the needs of the user.
The metering/printing modules of many current mailing machines utilize ink jet printing technology to print evidence of postage, such as postal indicia. Generally, an ink jet printer includes one or more arrays of nozzles (sometimes referred to as orifices), a supply of ink, a plurality of ejection elements (for example, expanding vapor bubble elements or piezoelectric transducer elements) corresponding to the nozzles and suitable driver and control electronics for controlling the ejection elements. Typically, the one or more arrays of nozzles and the ejection elements along with their associated components are referred to as a print head. It is the activation of the ejection elements that causes drops of ink to be expelled from the nozzles. The ink ejected in this manner forms drops which travel along a flight path until they reach a print medium such as a sheet of paper, an envelope or the like. Once they reach the print medium, the drops dry and collectively form a printed image, such as a Digital Postage Mark (DPM). Typically, the ejection elements are selectively activated (energized) or not activated (not energized) to expel or not expel, respectively, drops of ink as relative movement is provided between the print head and the print medium so that a predetermined or desired print image is achieved.
The postal services of many countries around the world permit and/or require the printing of DPMa that include two dimensional barcodes. DPMs typically include a number of information items in human readable and/or machine readable form, such as, and without limitation, the paid postage amount, the date and time the indicium was generated, the identification number of the postage meter used to generate the indicium, the ascending register value, a postal service symbol, the class of service desired for the mailpiece, the addressee ZIP code and/or address, and the sender's name and/or address. For example, the United States Postal Service has implemented a program known as the Information Based Indicia Program (IBIP) which permits a user to generate a postage indicium for sending a mailpiece (e.g., letter, package, etc.) that includes a human readable portion and a machine readable portion in the form of a two dimensional barcode, such as, without limitation, a Data Matrix symbol.
As is known, a two dimensional barcode, such as a Data Matrix symbol, typically consists of a number of data regions having nominally square modules arranged in an array, wherein each module generally represents one bit of data. For a black on white Data Matrix symbol, for instance, a darkened (i.e., filled) module represents a binary “one” and a light (e.g., empty) module represents a binary “zero.” Each darkened module typically consists of multiple printed pixels. For example, a darkened module may consist of 25 pixels arranged in a 5×5 pixel pattern. In a mailing machine where ink jet printing is used, each drop of ink is a pixel. The data regions in a two dimensional barcode are usually surrounded by a finder pattern which, in turn, is surrounded by a quiet zone border. In addition, multiple data regions may be separated by an alignment pattern.
The two dimensional barcodes employed in many DPMs, such as the Data Matrix symbol in an IBIP indicium, also include encrypted information, such as the postage amount and other postal data relating to the mailpiece and the postage meter that printed the indicium (usually referred to as a digital token or a digital signature), that may be used by the particular postal service in question to authenticate the indicia after the mailpieces have been placed into the mail stream for delivery. However, the improvement of photocopying, printing and scanning equipment over time has made it easier to commit fraud by copying and reusing postal indicia. Thus, there is a need for a system and method for preventing fraudulent duplication and reuse of DPMs that are printed using ink-j et printing technologies.
The present invention, in one embodiment, provides a method of preventing fraud by detecting possible duplicate printing of postal indicia by a mail processing system. The method includes receiving image data for printing a current postal indicium, and determining from the image data a number of pixels, e.g., the number of ink drops in the case of ink jet printing, that will be printed in a defined zone of the current postal indicium. The method further includes obtaining stored pixel count data that includes a plurality of stored pixel counts. Each of the stored pixel counts represents the number of pixels that were printed in the defined zone of one or more prior postal indicia previously printed by the mail processing system. The method then includes determining whether the number of pixels equals any one of the stored pixel counts, initiating one or more fraud prevention actions if it is determined that the number of pixels equals any one of the stored pixel counts, and printing the current postal indicium based upon the image data if it is determined that the number of pixels does not equal any one of the stored pixel counts. Preferably, the method further includes updating the stored pixel count data to include the number of pixels if it is determined that the number of pixels does not equal any one of the stored pixel counts.
The one or more fraud prevention actions may include, without limitation, preventing further printing of indicia by the mail processing system, and/or causing the mail processing system to provide a message indicating possible fraud to a third party such as a post or a party administering the purchase and use of postage funds.
The current postal indicium and each prior postal indicium may include a two dimensional barcode. In such case, the defined zone may include a portion of or all of the two dimensional barcode. In addition, the defined zone may include at least a portion of a human readable portion of the current postal indicium and each prior postal indicium. Furthermore, the defined zone may change, such as, for example, after each time the mail processing system is powered up, after a predetermined time period has expired, after a predetermined number of indicia have been printed, or after a predetermined number of maintenance operations have been performed. In one particular embodiment, the defined zone at each power up session is determined based upon a characteristic of the mail processing system, such as, without limitation, the current value of the ascending register of the mail processing system. The image data, in another particular embodiment, includes data for printing the number of pixels in at least one of human readable and encoded human readable form.
The present invention, in another embodiment, relates to a mail processing system capable of detecting possible duplicate printing of postal indicia that includes a printer, such as a an ink jet printer, a processor, such as a print head controller, in electronic communication with the printer, and a memory. The memory stores one or more routines executable by the processor and the stored pixel count data as described above. The one or more routines include instructions for implanting one or more of the various embodiments of the method described above.
Therefore, it should now be apparent that the invention substantially achieves all the above aspects and advantages. Additional aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. Moreover, the aspects and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
Referring to
The base unit 12 further includes a horizontal feed deck 30 that extends substantially from the input end 14 to the output end 16. A plurality of nudger rollers 32 are suitably mounted under the feed deck 30 and project upwardly through openings in the feed deck so that the periphery of the rollers 32 is slightly above the upper surface of the feed deck 30 and can exert a forward feeding force on a succession of mail pieces placed in the input end 14. A vertical wall 34 defines a mail piece stacking location from which the mail pieces are fed by the nudger rollers 32 along the feed deck 30 and into a transport mechanism (not shown) that transports the mail pieces in a downstream path of travel, as indicated by arrow A, through one or more modules, such as, for example, a separator module and moistening/sealing module. Each of these modules is located generally in the area indicated by reference numeral 36. The mail pieces are then passed to a metering/printing module (including print head controller 44 and ink jet print head 46 shown in
As described elsewhere herein, many postal services around the world provide for the use of Digital Postage Marks that include two dimensional barcodes having various types of information included therein, including encrypted information that may be used for later authentication of the DPM printed on the mailpiece. The mail processing system 10 described above may be used to print such DPMs using the print head controller 44 and the ink jet print head 46. As will be appreciated, the barcode information for each DPM that is printed will be different due to the nature and inherent variability of the data elements included in the barcode (e.g., the postage value, ascending register value, and addressee information) and due to the randomness that is included in the generation of the encrypted information that is included in the barcode, typically in the form of a digital signature. Thus, the number of and position of the darkened (e.g., black) and light (e.g., white) modules of each two dimensional barcode forming a part of a printed DPM will be different. In addition, it is common practice to dither the number of pixels in the module of a two dimensional barcode such that the number of pixels used in each darkened module is variable throughout the barcode, based on the adjacency of the dark module to a light module. Typically, this dithering is performed along the direction of the media movement to optimize several characteristics of the quality of the printed image such as print growth on the media and the control of misty spots.
Thus, due to the variability of the information included in the barcodes and/or the dithering, if employed, each barcode generated as part of a DPM by the mail processing system 10 will employ or include a different number of pixels (relative to the other barcodes generated by the mail processing system 10). Furthermore, because each pixel corresponds to a drop of ink emitted by the print head 46, each DPM will have a different ink drop count. As described in greater detail below, this ink drop count variability is used to detect and prevent duplicate printing and/or use of DPMs in the mail processing system 10.
Referring to
Next, at step 110, the drop count data for the defined zone of a predetermined number of DPM printed before the current DPM (e.g., without limitation, the last ten DPMs printed before the current DPM) is obtained from storage. At step 115, a determination is made as to whether the drop count determined at step 105 is equal to any of the drop counts obtained from storage in step 110. If the answer at step 115 is yes, then that is an indication of possible duplication fraud due to the fact that it is highly unlikely that the defined zones of any of the DPMs in question (especially if the zones include at least a portion of the barcode) will include the exact same number of ink drops. As a result, if the answer at step 115 is yes, then, at step 120, one or more fraud prevention actions are initiated. Such actions may include, without limitation, shutting down or locking out the mail processing system 10 and/or sending an electronic message to the party that administers the use of the mail processing system 10 and/or the purchase of postal funds for the mail processing system 10.
If the answer at step 115 is no, meaning that no drop count match was detected, then, at step 125, the DPM is printed. Specifically, the print head controller 44, based on the image data it received, sends appropriately timed firing pulses to the print head 46 to cause the print head 46 to print the DPM onto a mailpiece or a label to be applied to a mailpiece. Next, at step 130, the stored drop count data is updated to include the drop count data for the DPM just printed. Preferably, step 130 involves adding the drop count data for the DPM just printed and deleting the drop count data for the “oldest” DPM being stored (i.e., the DPM having the earliest time of printing of the stored DPMs).
In an alternative embodiment, the image data received in step 100 and printed in step 125 may include data for printing, in human readable or encoded human readable form (e.g., as part of the printed barcode), the drop count data for the defined zone of the DPM. As will be appreciated, the printed drop count data may later be used by a third party, such as a postal service, when examining a batch of mailpieces to determine wither duplication fraud may have been committed. Specifically, when examining a batch of mailpieces processed by a system such as the mail processing system 10, if the third party sees duplicate drop count numbers, that party will be alerted to possible fraud and can therefore take appropriate action.
According to still another alternative embodiment, the defined zone used in the method shown in
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated above, it should be understood that these are exemplary of the invention and are not to be considered as limiting. Additions, deletions, substitutions, and other modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be considered as limited by the foregoing description but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5999921 | Arsenault et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6058190 | Cordery et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6318856 | Sansone | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6361164 | Sansone | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6442276 | Doljack | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6549640 | Sansone et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6688742 | Sansone | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6782116 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6839693 | Cordery et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 20020087494 | Herbert | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20030120922 | Sun et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20050091170 | Nambudiri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2005059753 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080033891 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
