The subject matter disclosed herein relates to detecting impact forces on aircraft, and in particular to detecting landing gear impact on aircraft.
Aircraft such as, for example, rotary wing aircraft and fixed wing aircraft use a variety of sensors to provide feedback to aircraft control systems. Detecting when a force, such as weight, is applied to the landing assemblies or other portions of an aircraft provides useful feedback to aircraft systems. Previous systems used sensors located on each landing assembly to determine whether weight was applied to a landing assembly. The use of these sensors increased the weight and complexity of the aircraft, and had limited fidelity in sensing actual weight applied to a landing assembly.
According to one aspect of the invention, a method for sensing a force applied to an aircraft includes defining a first velocity vector as a function of a first velocity due to a rotation motion of the aircraft, defining a second velocity vector as a function of a second velocity due to the rotation motion of the aircraft, defining an instant axis of rotation of the aircraft as a function of the first velocity vector and the second velocity vector, determining whether a force has been exerted on a first portion of the aircraft, and outputting an indication that a force has been exerted on the first portion of the aircraft responsive to determining that the force has been exerted on the first portion of the aircraft.
According to another aspect of the invention, a system for sensing a force applied to an aircraft includes a first sensor, a second sensor, and a processor operative to define a first velocity vector as a function of a first velocity due to a rotation motion of the aircraft, define a second velocity vector as a function of a second velocity due to the rotation motion of the aircraft, define an instant axis of rotation of the aircraft as a function of the first velocity vector and the second velocity vector, determine whether a force has been exerted on a first portion of the aircraft, and output an indication that a force has been exerted on the first portion of the aircraft responsive to determining that the force has been exerted on the first portion of the aircraft.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The detailed description explains embodiments of the invention, together with advantages and features, by way of example with reference to the drawings.
MRN:={(|{right arrow over (ω)}|>α)&({dot over ({right arrow over (ω)}|>β} (1)
The processor 102 resets the aircraft velocities and accelerations values as follows:
Thereafter the initialization routine outputs velocities and accelerations due to the rotation motion of the aircraft only ({right arrow over (v)}roti and {right arrow over (v)}roti) where:
The initialization routine determines whether the acceleration norm due to the rotation motion of the aircraft exceed the acceleration norm threshold value (γ) to output an enabling signal (Enable) to enable the landing detection process, as follows:
if {(MRN is true)&({right arrow over (α)}roti|>γ)}, then: Enable=1 (4)
In block 304 the processor 102 receives sensor coordinates (Pisensor) 303, which includes locations of the sensors, and performs Euler-Axis routine that determines an instant axis of rotation of the aircraft defined as the intersection line of two non-parallel planes as illustrated in
Paxis(s)=Paxis+{right arrow over (u)}axis·s (5)
In a three dimensional space, plane Δ is defined by a point P and a normal vector {right arrow over (n)}. Two planes Δ1 and Δ2 are not parallel if their normal vectors {right arrow over (n)}1 and {right arrow over (n)}2 are not parallel; this is equivalent to the cross product norm condition (CPN), where CPN=|{right arrow over (n)}1×{right arrow over (n)}2|≧μ>>0. To determine the axis of rotation directional unit vector {right arrow over (u)}axis; the best two non parallel velocity vectors are selected by maximizing CPN, where:
CPN=max{|{right arrow over (v)}rot1×{right arrow over (v)}rot2|,{right arrow over (v)}rot1×{right arrow over (v)}rot3|,|{right arrow over (v)}rot2×{right arrow over (v)}rot3|} (6)
In vector space, the axis of rotation directional unit vector is given by:
To simplify the example, CPN==|{right arrow over (v)}rot1×{right arrow over (v)}rot2|, thus selecting sensor_1 and sensor_2 for the detection process.
To determine the intersection line, axis of rotation, a specific point is found on the line, that is, to find a point Paxis that lies in both planes Δ1 and Δ2, thereby solving implicit equations of Δ1 and Δ2 for Paxis:
Δ1:{right arrow over (v)}rot1·(Paxis−Psensor1)=0
Δ2:{right arrow over (v)}rot2·(Paxis−Psensor2)=0 (8)
Equivalently solving for three coordinates Paxis
Where d1 and d2 are known constants given by:
For a robust solution of Equation 9, a direct linear equation algorithm is used. First a largest absolute coordinate value, noted δ, of {right arrow over (u)}axis given by equation 7, is selected by:
δ=max{absolute(uaxis
Depending of the value of 6 from equation 11, the corresponding coordinate of Paxis is set to zero. Solving for the two other coordinates, the equation 9 gives the general solution for Paxis expressed as:
In block 306, the axis-distances routine receives gear coordinates 305 that include locations of the gears Pkgear 101, 103, 105 (of
λaxis-geark=|(Pgeark−Paxis)×{right arrow over (u)}axis|; K=1,2,3 (13)
λcg=|Paxis×{right arrow over (u)}axis| (14)
In block 308, the detection logic determines if the distance from the axis of rotation to a given gear is the minimum of the axis-distances values and is less than a gear-axis-distance threshold value defined as a gear-cylinder-diameter λcylinder 307 and the distance from the axis of rotation to center of gravity of the aircraft exceeds the gear-axis-distance threshold value then the detection logic identifies the landing gear as center-of-rotation. The detection logic outputs a weight on wheel (force on wheel) signal 310 indicating contact:
With: WOW=1→left gear; WOW=2→right gear; WOW=3→foward gear.
The gear WoW signal 310 in
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3499500 | Harding | Mar 1970 | A |
4638437 | Cleary et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4815678 | Gawne | Mar 1989 | A |
4980835 | Lawrence et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5167385 | Hafner | Dec 1992 | A |
5446666 | Bauer | Aug 1995 | A |
5826833 | Evans et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5927646 | Sandy et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6052069 | Silder, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6189836 | Gold et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6259379 | Paterson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
7093795 | Lindahl et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7471997 | Tezuka | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7742846 | Fanciullo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20040078170 | Di Marzio | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20080114506 | Davis et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119967 | Long et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080215198 | Richards | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100288878 | Bennett | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110203391 | Knoop et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120095802 | Wilberding et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120253652 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |