Pumps may be used for pumping a substance, such as a slurry or a fluid (gas or liquid) through a channel from a starting point towards an end point. In this sense, many different kinds of pumps are known.
A distinction may be made between positive and non-positive displacement pumps. Positive displacement pumps produce substantially the same flow at a given speed (RPM, revolutions per minute) no matter what the discharge pressure. Irrespective of the flow resistance in the channel in which they discharge, they will provide the same volumetric flow at given RPM.
On the other hand, non-positive displacement pumps are known, e.g. velocity pumps. In velocity pumps, kinetic energy is added to the fluid by increasing the flow velocity. This increase in energy is converted to an increased pressure and/or an increased flow at the exit of the pump. These pumps do not have a constant discharge (“volume rate of flow” or “volumetric rate of flow”, expressed e.g. in m3/s, or ft3/s) for a given pump speed. Different types of velocity pumps are known, such as e.g. centrifugal pumps, axial pumps and mixed-flow pumps.
The pumps may be driven by a suitable motor operationally connected with it. The control of the motor (and thereby the control of the pump) may be regulated e.g. in terms of a voltage or in terms of its speed (RPM). However, the discharge (volumetric rate of flow) of velocity pumps will depend not only on their drive speed, but also on the flow resistance of the channel in which they discharge.
Advantages related to velocity pumps are that they may be more reliable and generally less costly than positive displacement pumps. A disadvantage related to the use of a velocity pump is that maintaining a specific discharge can be more complicated to achieve. For example, if the channel in which the pump discharges gets clogged, or undergoes other changes, the pump setpoint (voltage or RPM) would need to be changed in order to maintain a constant flow. In applications wherein the discharge is critical, regular calibration of the pump may need to be carried out.
The process of calibration may generally be an iterative process based on trial and error. A first pump setpoint (voltage or RPM) is chosen which may be based e.g. on previous experience with the pump. The volume rate of flow in the channel may then determined. Based on the achieved volume rate of flow, the setpoint may be changed, e.g. the RPMs of the pump may be increased or decreased. After determining the volume rate of flow at the second setpoint, the setpoint may be changed once again, and so on, until the pump setpoint is found that delivers the required volume rate of flow within determined boundaries. This process may be cumbersome, especially in applications wherein the calibration needs to carried out frequently.
In methods and systems according to the examples of the present invention, the above-mentioned problem can be resolved or reduced.
Particular examples of the present invention will be described in the following by way of non-limiting examples, with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
The pump control 35 may further be configured to send control signals 62 to the motor of the pump. These control signals may be e.g. in the form of a voltage or a speed (revolutions per minute RPM) to be applied to the motor. In response to these control signals, the pump setpoint (point of operation) may be changed or kept constant, i.e. the flow may be decreased or increased or maintained constant. The pump in this example may be a velocity pump, such as e.g. a centrifugal pump.
A flow sensor 45 may be arranged within channel 40 to determine the actual fluid flow through the channel. The measured flow may be sent as a feedback signal to the pump control 35. In an example, a repository 38 comprising performance curves of the pump may be provided. The performance curves may be stored as mathematical functions describing them. Also, a single mathematical function describing all performance curves (a pump performance surface) may be used.
The pump control 35 may consult the repository to obtain the performance curves. Based on the measured flow and these performance curves, the pump control may determine the setpoint of the pump for delivering a desired rate of flow. Examples of how to determine this setpoint will be described later with reference to the other figures. This setpoint may be sent in the form of a suitable control signal 62 to pump 30.
In an alternative example, schematically illustrated in
A further difference with respect to the previous example is that the repository 38 comprising performance curves of the pump is stored in a memory of the pump control 35.
Pump systems according to these examples may be incorporated in printing apparatus. One possible application of such a pump system is in a laser printing apparatus. For each individual colour (black, cyan, magenta, yellow), a pump that transfer ink from the ink tank to the Binary Ink Developer (BID) may be provided. Another possible application in a printing apparatus is a pump providing a cleaning fluid towards the Photo Imaging Plate (PIP) in order to clean and cool the PIP.
In both these applications, a predefined exact and constant amount of flow is generally required. A positive displacement pump may thus seem a logical choice for the pump. However, positive displacement pumps may be relatively costly and less reliable than e.g. centrifugal pumps. Additionally, for certain substances, such as e.g. ink composed of particles in a fluid, positive displacement pumps may not be suitable.
The use of a velocity pump (centrifugal or other) means that the volume flow provided by the pump is not automatically determined by the pump setpoint. The volume flow may thus need to be checked regularly. The channels from the ink tanks to the BID may e.g. get clogged, which could reduce the flow through the channel even though the pump works at the same setpoint.
A new pump setpoint may be determined e.g. on a daily basis. According to prior art solutions, this process may be an iterative process based on trial and error. A first pump setpoint (voltage or RPM) is chosen which may be based on previous experience with the pump. The volume rate of flow in the channel may then be determined. Based on the achieved volume rate of flow, the setpoint may be changed, e.g. the RPMs of the pump may be increased or decreased. After determining the volume rate of flow at the second setpoint, the setpoint may be changed once again, and so on, until the pump setpoint is found that delivers the required volume rate of flow within determined boundaries. This process may be cumbersome.
Improvements to this process according to several examples will be explained with reference to the following figures.
The performance curves, also sometimes referred to as “characteristic curves” may be obtained empirically, through standardized tests. Alternatively, they may be deduced from the pump data sheet supplied by the pump manufacturer. The performance curves show the relation between the pressure at the pump's exit and the flow rate for a given setpoint. The pressure at the pump's exit may be expressed in units of pressure or in meters of “pump head”.
The pressure (P) of the pump performance surface is a function of the volume flow (Q) and the setpoint (V or RPM). In the following, the voltage will be taken as a setpoint, but it should be understood that the same reasoning could be held if speed (RPM) were chosen.
In some cases, the pressure may be linearly dependent on the voltage. If this is not the case, the performance surface may usually be very well approximated by assuming this linearity in the operational range. Thus: P(Q,V)=f(Q)+a.V+b, wherein f(Q) is the function expressing the relation between pressure and volume flow, and a and b are constants of the linear relation between the voltage and the pressure.
An infinite number of performance curves for an infinite number of setpoints may exist. All performance curves together may form a pump performance surface such as the one shown in
In the example illustrated in
Assume that a desired flow rate of approximately 7.5 lpm. This desired flow rate is identified in
By measuring the actual flow through the channel, the actual flow rate identified in
Lines 11, 12 and 13, in
Once the flow resistance is known, the required voltage for achieving the desired volume flow (i.e. flow at point D) can be determined without the need for any iterative process. As illustrated in
In this particular example, if the flow resistance of the channel, h, were known, the pressure needed to deliver the desired flow rate could be determined by P′=h.Q′2, wherein P′ is the required pressure and Q′ is the desired flow rate. And if the required pressure were known, the function f would need to be inverted to find the required setpoint: f1 (Q′, P′)=V′, wherein V′ is the required setpoint. In the particular example shown the required voltage can be calculated as follows:
Compared to the prior art, wherein the determination of the required setpoint is an iterative process of educated guessing, the solution according to the present example is much quicker and can be fully automated. As discussed before, these kinds of pumps may be found e.g. in components of printing apparatus wherein providing a very specific flow is critical. In these cases, the above calibration process may be carried out e.g. once a day. Every day, time can be saved in the calibration process compared with prior art methods.
However, velocity pumps such as centrifugal pumps may be found in many different applications. Whenever providing a specific flow is important, and thus whenever regular calibration is desirable, the method according to this example can be particularly beneficial.
If the relationship between pressure and flow is not linear, the equation above for determining the required setpoint may change, but the principle described before will not.
In another example, the function P=f(Q) expressing the relation between pressure and volume flow may not be linear. If linear interpolation is sufficiently accurate between performance curves, then the equation: P(Q,V)=f(Q)+a.V+b is still the same. Also The equation describing the relation between the flow and flow resistance does not change: P=h.Q2. Solving the equations, the setpoint V′ required to achieve a desired flow Q′ becomes:
wherein Q is the flow measured at the first setpoint.
The channels' flow resistance may be determined only implicitly, i.e. it is not necessary to first explicitly determine the channel's flow resistance and then determine the required pump setpoint based on this flow resistance. Rather, the mathematical equation describing the relation between the flow resistance, pressure and the flow through the channel may be implicitly used in solving the mathematical equation giving the required setpoint, in a manner similar to what was shown in the previous examples.
In some examples, the pump performance curves may be delivered by the pump manufacturer in the form of a pump datasheet. Such a method is schematically illustrated in
In the example of
Based on the pump performance curves (or on the pump performance surface), the channel's flow resistance can be determined. If the channel flow resistance is known, the required setpoint to deliver a desired volume flow may be easily determined. Also, in this case, the flow resistance of the channel need not be determined explicitly.
The pump control may incorporate a computing apparatus having a memory comprising computer readable instructions for carrying out the above process.
In an example, a computer program product may be provided, adapted for putting the explained methods into practice. The program may be in the form of source code, object code, a code intermediate source and object code such as in partially compiled form, or in any other form suitable for use in the implementation of the methods. The carrier may be any entity or device capable of carrying the program.
For example, the carrier may comprise a storage medium, such as a ROM, for example a CD ROM or a semiconductor ROM, or a magnetic recording medium, for example a floppy disc or hard disk. Further, the carrier may be a transmissible carrier such as an electrical or optical signal, which may be conveyed via electrical or optical cable or by radio or other means.
Although only a number of particular embodiments and examples of the invention have been disclosed herein, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof are possible. Furthermore, the present invention covers all possible combinations of the particular embodiments described. Thus, the scope of the present invention should not be limited by particular embodiments, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3524978 | Iwata et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3722545 | Furlani | Mar 1973 | A |
4108574 | Bartley et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4467258 | Leuthen | Aug 1984 | A |
4678404 | Lorett et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5107441 | Decker | Apr 1992 | A |
5213477 | Watanabe et al. | May 1993 | A |
5240380 | Mabe | Aug 1993 | A |
5307288 | Haines | Apr 1994 | A |
5497664 | Jorritsma | Mar 1996 | A |
5601413 | Langley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5815175 | Seikel | Sep 1998 | A |
6325093 | Ooshima | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330525 | Hays et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346196 | Watson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6517178 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6676383 | Schob | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7516641 | Lewis | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7861740 | Phallen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20050025628 | Jones | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070078703 | Shipley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070166169 | Venkatachari et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings and Pipe. Stamford, CT: Crane, 2013. N. pag. Print. TP-410. pp. i-vii, 5-1-5-5, 6-4-6-7 and A-30. |
ITT Goulds Pumps. Aqua Force Pressure Boostng Sizing Guide. Jun. 2007. Technical guide. |
Johnson Controls. Fluid Flow in Piping Systems. Sep. 1989. Engineering Bulletin H110. 507 E. Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI 53201. |
Johnson Controls. Components of Hydronic Systems. Jun. 1989. Engineering Bulletin H111. 507 E. Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI 53201. |
http://www.levitronix.com/application-notes-809.html?file=tl_files/images/fluidhandling/Documents/Application%20Notes%20New/Key%20Words/Flow%20Control/Spray%20Tool%20Applications.pdf; Feb. 17, 2009. Spray Tool Applications. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140030113 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |